OK. That's seems a reasonable approach.

I don't think vi on adverb entries is helpful in most cases. It doesn't tell you whether the word is used like a regular verb or just adjectivally as 〜した/〜している.
I wouldn't object to including it on entries where we lead with vs (like this one).

As I said, I don't mind  vi tag here. I'll close to trim the list, and reopen for a while.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

(only ムズムズ on that list is what we're specifically talking about here)
I don't think there's an innate rule that says a スル adv can't be vt, although I'm hard-pressed to come up with one that isn't. But くんくん for example has one を-して example on reverso (out of 7). 
But even if there is indeed such a rule, and all of these スル adv can only be vi, I would expect that only a minority of our users would be aware of that, so I think we should still mark them as vi.

lsrc tag no needed if we have the first sense.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">dual coat</lsource>

I agree.

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>dual coat (paint, finish, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>

The google results (esp. images) seem to be all about the double coating, actually?

I'm seeing a few cases where it seems to mean dual coating.

daijs: https://kotobank.jp/word/デュアルコート-576962

デュアルコート	60
リバーシブルコート	1551

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>dual coat</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1142270">リバーシブルコート</xref>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">dual coat</lsource>
+<gloss>reversible coat</gloss>

GG5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&chem;</field>

I'm OK with yoji on this entry but I wouldn't mind dropping it either. It's included in 新明解四字熟語辞典.
I don't think the second gloss is needed.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>era full of happiness and ideals</gloss>

Stray period.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>era full of happiness and ideals.</gloss>
+<gloss>era full of happiness and ideals</gloss>

https://www.edrdg.org/projects/yojijukugo.html

This one is in 3 of the 4 sources on the project page, as well as in the yoji.jitenon.jp site. I'll leave the tag there for now, but I think we need to have an agreed way of settling on the use of the tag. I'll raise an issue for it.

I will repeat what I've said many times before on this topic - what does [yoji] here tell us about this word except the very obvious, namely that it's written with 4 characters? In Japanese, anything that consists of 4 characters can be called a 四字熟語, but if we're going to use it a way that's the least bit meaningful to our users, we have to make a  more narrow selection. That's why I once suggested we instead call it [iyoji] for idiomatic 4-ji jukugo to make it clearer we shouldn't just slap it onto anything. Nobody else seemed to favor it and I agreed at the time it was probbly fine as [yoji] but as we keep having this argument as if we're lost sight of what the intended use of it was, I'm not sure that was really the right decision.

I'm also not a fan of the new gloss. Meikyo has 2 senses, btw.

https://yoji.jitenon.jp/yoji/299.html?getdata=黄金時代&search=contain

Maybe we should accept that ref?

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>era full of happiness and ideals.</gloss>

chuujiten

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>jail</gloss>
+<gloss>gaol</gloss>

Better wording

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>(received) present</gloss>
+<gloss>present (that one has received)</gloss>

Ngrams

Close to being "uk".

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>いただき物</keb>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>contents of a document, esp. a letter</gloss>
+<gloss>contents of a document (esp. of a letter)</gloss>

GG5

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>content of a piece of writing, especially a letter</gloss>
+<gloss>contents of a document, esp. a letter</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>content of a letter</gloss>
+<gloss>content of a piece of writing, especially a letter</gloss>

GG5, 中辞典

A bit tighter. Several EJs use this to gloss "calendar".

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>calendar making</gloss>
+<gloss>calendar</gloss>
+<gloss>calendar system</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

Entry created

I don't think it's obscure. Plenty of hits online for "柑橘類 アルベド".

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2153840">反射能・はんしゃのう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2153840">反射能</xref>
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2179560">中果皮・ちゅうかひ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2179560">中果皮</xref>
@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>mesocarp of a fruit</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>mesocarp</gloss>

daijs has that 2nd sense too, but I eonder if it should maybe be tagged as [obsc]

ＫＯＤ追加語彙
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albedo_(disambiguation)

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<field>&physics;</field>
@@ -11,0 +13,9 @@
+<gloss>reflectivity</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2179560">中果皮・ちゅうかひ</xref>
+<field>&bot;</field>
+<gloss>albedo</gloss>
+<gloss>mesocarp of a fruit</gloss>
+<gloss>pith</gloss>

「モノのなまえ辞典」 (ISBN: 9784591164211) pg. 13

Regarding the existing entry for アルベド, it also seems to mean 'pith' or 'medulla' (or 'mesocarp'). See also: 中果皮, 髄, etc.

Note further the similar word フルベド that I submitted.

@@ -9,0 +9,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2153840">反射能・はんしゃのう</xref>
+<field>&astron;</field>

GG5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&bot;</field>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>epicarp</gloss>

Entry created

Funny, that.

Didn't touch the x-ref. Old bug where the x-ref drops off if both entries have changes pending.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1249820">刑務所</xref>

goalって?
I can live without it.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>gaol</gloss>

Do we really need the dated "goal" spelling on a col entry?

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>gaol</gloss>

をでっぷりした  0

Hard to imagine this being transitive.

daij, gg5

Not a noun.
We don't include transitivity tags on adverbs, do we?

@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -10,4 +11,5 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
-<gloss>stoutness</gloss>
-<gloss>corpulence</gloss>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>with a lot of fat</gloss>
+<gloss>with a heavy build</gloss>
+<gloss>with a portly build</gloss>
+<gloss>with a stout build</gloss>

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

でっぷり	22245
でっぷりと	7286
でっぷりして	1431
でっぷりした	2597

The JEs use でっぷりした.

@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -10 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

Daijisen

@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -10 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>

GG5, etc.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&biochem;</field>

Entry created

There is no official dictionary in Australia, although Macquarie University Press would like you to think their one is.

Although there is a separate entry for ソースボート, this one should probably also reference 'sauce boat' in English too. (That is, in Australia, our official dictionary, the Macquarie Dictionary, doesn't have an entry for 'gravy boat', only 'sauce boat'.)

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>sauce boat</gloss>

I don't think we need to mention the curry.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>gravy boat (also used for curry, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>gravy boat</gloss>

グレイビーボート	127
グレービーボート	91
KOD: グレイビー･ボート 〔ソースなどを入れる舟型の食器〕 a gravy boat.

See merged/deleted 2853864.

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<reb>グレイビーボート</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>グレイビー・ボート</reb>
@@ -12 +18 @@
-<gloss>gravy boat</gloss>
+<gloss>gravy boat (also used for curry, etc.)</gloss>

I've looked at this a couple of times, but frankly without getting into a lot of detail, translating extensively from the kokugos, it's hard to add much more. I think it's better to leave this brief entry, and anyone wanting more can head off to special sources.

A specific piece of clothing? Or the entire thing?
A lot of these old entries leave a lot to be desired

@@ -15,5 +15,5 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2637310">女房装束・にょうぼうしょうぞく</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2590700">唐衣・からぎぬ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2594290">直衣・のうし</xref>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>Heian period court clothing</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2637310">女房装束</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2590700">唐衣</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2594290">直衣</xref>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Heian-period court clothing</gloss>

@@ -15,1 +15,5 @@
-<gloss>ancient kimono (from the Heian period onwards)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2637310">女房装束・にょうぼうしょうぞく</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2590700">唐衣・からぎぬ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2594290">直衣・のうし</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>Heian period court clothing</gloss>

daij

I agree with Marcus's suggestion to delete this entry and add 三鞭酒 as an ateji form to シャンパン. I'm not seeing any evidence that it's read さんべんしゅ when referring to champagne.

世界大百科事典 薬酒 entry
。蛤蚧酒はトカゲを漬け込んだもので，3種の動物の陽根をつけるという三鞭酒（サンピエンチユウ）などとともに，強精剤としての効果を信ずる人も多いという。

I 'm really not seeing a good case for splitting here. No source has さんべんしゅ. Several do have シャンパン (or rather, mention this kanji in their シャンパン entries) The rakuten/amazon listings aren't reliable. The drink referred to is an (at least in Japan) very obscure Chinese drink which doesn't seem to have anything to do with champagne, and is maybe actually read サンピエンチュウ. Now that we have rK, why not use it?

We've been thrashing this around for years. We settled on the two-entry approach in 2017, and I still think it's the cleanest. I'd like to keep さんべんしゅ there somewhere, which would make consolidation messy. I think the  しゃんぱん reading can go.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -9,3 +9,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>しゃんぱん</reb>
@@ -17 +15 @@
-<gloss>Champagne</gloss>
+<gloss>champagne</gloss>

That specifically is a Chinese product though, doesn't look to be related to actual CHampagne. (the listings don't mention シャンパン etc.)
I'd drop the reading or actually delete this entry and include it as a [rK,ateji] on the main シャンパン entry.

Yes, we should split on source language. I'll create a new entry.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>キーウ</reb>

https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=53786

キーウ is being used by the BBC's Japanese operation as it more closely matches Kyiv. "Kiev" is more the Soviet era name. Possibly the entry should be split.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キーウ</reb>

wiki

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<gloss>Kyiv</gloss>

We should have "song" in there.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>performed song</gloss>

Except that it's used for instrumental music as well. Songs involve voices. Either we have several glosses or one more general one.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>song being performed</gloss>
+<gloss>musical item being performed</gloss>

I think Robin's "song being performed" was better? " item on a concert program" seems overly specific to me and isn't a great match for the first refs posted.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>item on a concert program</gloss>
-<gloss>piece being performed</gloss>
+<gloss>song being performed</gloss>

This has hung around long enough. Maybe this.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<field>&music;</field>
+<gloss>item on a concert program</gloss>
@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>song being performed</gloss>

The sense we have here isn't a music term. It refers to songs/pieces on a set list/programme. Is there another sense?

We don't tag dialectal terms as col.

@@ -19,3 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2157980">戎さん・えべっさん</xref>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<s_inf>var. dialect forms</s_inf>
+<s_inf>dialectal</s_inf>
@@ -22,0 +21 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">god of fishing and commerce</gloss>

At the margin I think it's worth hanging onto these.

おいべっさん	1092
えびっさん	421
おべっさん	170
およべっさん	38
---
えべっさん	65076

Do we really need these forms? I think it's sufficient just to have えべっさん, which is far more common than the others.

Split from 2157980.

"lead pointer" appears to be the more common term.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>lead sharpener (for clutch pencil)</gloss>
-<gloss>lead pointer</gloss>
+<gloss>lead pointer (for a clutch pencil)</gloss>
+<gloss>lead sharpener</gloss>

芯削り	937

Got one around somewhere.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>lead sharpener (for clutch pencil)</gloss>

http://zokeifile.musabi.ac.jp/芯研器/
https://kubobun.com/shopping/drafting/51385dsbk.htm
https://yamadastationery.jp/2mm芯専用芯研器-/p/10000765/

No-one seems to want this.

バランスシート縮小	< 20
バランスシート	98779
縮小	2813046

Very A+B with a clear meaning. I think not.

https://jp.tradingview.com/chart/EURAUD/hOCLNoeg/

バランスシート縮小とは、各国中央銀行が金融緩和フェーズで購入した国債や社債などの資産を売却し、市場に流通するお金を減らすこと

Robin is probably right. I'm OK either way.

新メニュー	316841
新しいメニュー	48679

I let it in as 新+loanword is rather the exception. I think it could be handy to be able to confirm it's in use.

I don't think we need an entry for a very simple collocation like this, especially when 新しいルール is also common. "new rule" is not an idiom. Nor is it something people would do a reverse lookup for.

Interesting.

新ルール	53025
新しいルール	21100


新フライト	87
新しいフライト	385


新ファッション   	2439
新しいファッション	12446


新相手   	51
新しい相手	4693

A+b but あたらしい is usu. more common than 新-

班 is always people.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>dividing into groups (e.g. people)</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>dividing into groups (of people)</gloss>

班分け	13895
グループ分け	77655
チーム分け	25418

Fairly common to see this use of the 分け suffix. Probably worth having.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>dividing (people) into groups</gloss>
+<gloss>dividing into groups (e.g. people)</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/班分け

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バッグ・クロージャー</reb>

http://nlp.cis.unimelb.edu.au/jwb/clst/gaiseggloss.cgi?sent=�Хå����������㡼
バッグクロージャー	207

@@ -9,3 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>bread tag</gloss>
-<gloss>bread clip</gloss>
-<gloss>bread tab</gloss>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">bag closure</lsource>
+<gloss>bread bag clip</gloss>

「モノのなまえ辞典」 (ISBN: 9784591164211) pg. 16

Merged with  グレービーボート entry.

「モノのなまえ辞典」 (ISBN: 9784591164211) pg. 18

From 'gravy boat'.

The quote prsented says フルベド is Latin (prob "flavedo"), with no indication it's used in Japanese.

フルベド is not in references, gets 0 n-grams and is only in a handful of WWW pages, all of which seem false positives (e.g. "full bed". I don't think it has a case for inclusion.

「モノのなまえ辞典」 (ISBN: 9784591164211) pg. 13

Note the existing entry for 外果皮. In the quoted book, the following two sentences appear:
- 外側の皮は、日本語だと外果皮というんだ。
- ちなみにミカンなどの外側の皮はラテン語で「黄色いもの」という意味で、「フルベド」と呼ばれているよ。
So it would seem that 外果皮 and フルベド are equivalent, and are rendered 'exocarp' in English.

(Note further that 'epicarp' is a synonym for 'exocarp', and so should appear alongside 'exocarp' in both entries.)

daij

Not wasei:
https://plantix.net/en/library/plant-diseases/800080/sugar-spot
"The symptoms will appear after the banana harvest. Initially, small dark spots develop on the banana peel, which can enlarge over time. Brown spots can also be observed on fruit flesh."

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&q=banana+"sugar+spot"&btnG=

daij also don't call it wasei.

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>black spots that appear on a ripened banana</gloss>
+<gloss>sugar spot (on a banana)</gloss>
+<gloss>dark spot</gloss>
+<gloss>black spot</gloss>
+<gloss>brown spot</gloss>

「モノのなまえ辞典」 (ISBN: 9784591164211) pg. 22

From 'sugar spot'.

Plenty of business names contain colloquialisms. It's definitely an informal term.

https://www.google.com/maps/search/美腸/@35.6410186,139.2762892,10z/data=!3m1!4b1

Not sure if this is really [col], as it's used in business names.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

Not in refs but seems valid.

https://www.abc-cooking.co.jp/plus/feature/201601_labo/#:~:text=美腸とは腸,のバランスが重要です。

美腸	1823

gg5
https://www.towaprintinglab.com/project-12

Should treat it like other number entries, although it seems to be usually prenominal.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<pos>&num;</pos>

doee "four" work as the gloss for an adjective? Would it be better kept as [n]?

クアトロフォルマッジ	722
クアトロフォルマッジオ	136
クアトロチーズ	59

Maybe this?

@@ -11,3 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<lsource xml:lang="ita"/>
-<gloss>quatro</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<lsource xml:lang="ita">quatro</lsource>
+<gloss>four</gloss>

クアトロ	99205
クワトロ	93534

frequent in クアトロフォルマッジ etc. (saw it as "クアトロチーズ" on a package of snacks)

https://www.chojyu.com/column2020/column-details-211101.html
"「腸活」とは、腸内細菌の集まり、いわゆる腸内フローラのバランスを整えて、腸の働きを改善することを指します。"
https://mandahakko.com/column/knowledge006/
"腸活とは腸内フローラと呼ばれる腸内環境をバランスよくととのえることをいいます。"

I preferred Nicolas's gloss. 活 here doesn't refer to intestinal activity but rather the attempts/efforts to improve one's gut health.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>intestinal activity (e.g. stimulating gut flora)</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>trying to improve one's gut health</gloss>
+<gloss>maintaining a healthy gut</gloss>

What's wrong with the initial proposal? I think the meaning is clearer on that one.

I agree it's a bit 直訳 which is why I added the extra information. It's one of those oh-so-common Japanese euphemisms,

Not a fan of the new gloss. "Intestinal activity" sounds to me like bowel movements, changes in gut flora etc.

I think this is fine.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>cuatro</gloss>
+<gloss>cuatro (guitar)</gloss>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuatro_(instrument)

Could mention it's a variety of 4-stringed guitar.

フォルマッジオ	644
フォルマッジ	453
https://ameblo.jp/forma1234/entry-11796103845.html

Often in restaurant names, it seems.

Split from 1001200.

保証会社	87893
https://twitter.com/marguerite_site/status/1412994420085968898
【現状】アパマンから最後通告の手紙が来ました。
保証会社の審査を通らなければ住めなくなります。
家賃を払っているのになんでこんな目に遭わないといけないのでしょうか。

kagoshima/okinawa apparently

https://nlab.itmedia.co.jp/nl/articles/2007/17/news137.html

https://japanesedialects.com/kyushu-okinawa/kagoshima-dialect/dakarayo/

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1144805401

https://togetter.com/li/1100681
鹿児島人が県外でうっかり使ってしまう方言「だからよ」

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1584695">面・めん・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1584695">面・2</xref>
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1584695">面・めん・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1584695">面・3</xref>

GG5

Not sure that "esp" is valid.

@@ -12 +12,8 @@
-<gloss>mask, esp. animal or human face, for use in plays or by children</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1584695">面・めん・2</xref>
+<gloss>mask</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1584695">面・めん・3</xref>
+<field>&MA;</field>
+<gloss>striking the head (kendo)</gloss>

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/お面

More modern Romanization.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<gloss>Kyiv</gloss>

RP

Suzi

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&surname;</misc>