@@ -9 +9 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="fre"/>
+<lsource xml:lang="fre">adieu</lsource>

daij, gg5

@@ -8,3 +8,4 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<lsource xml:lang="fre">adieu</lsource>
-<gloss>good-bye</gloss>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<lsource xml:lang="fre"/>
+<gloss>adieu</gloss>
+<gloss>goodbye</gloss>

Bulk addition of vi and vt from Meikyo
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Daij (both of them) specifically mention football.

daij
G n-grams:
シミュレーション	2216116
シュミレーション	460233
シミュレション	137

Added sense.
シミュレション isn't in my refs. Not at all common either. I think we can drop it.
Don't need the [comp] tag.

@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>シミュレション</reb>
@@ -18 +14,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
@@ -20,0 +17,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>simulation (of a foul)</gloss>
+<gloss>diving</gloss>
+<gloss>flopping</gloss>
+</sense>

スレーヴ	6005

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スレーヴ</reb>

daij, gg5
G n-grams:
スレイブ	15378
スレーブ	74134
スレイヴ	3655

Usually used in computing contexts.

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<reb>スレーブ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -7,3 +9,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>スレーブ</reb>
@@ -16 +16,7 @@
-<gloss>slave</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1127970">マスター・6</xref>
+<gloss>slave (device)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1445650">奴隷・1</xref>
+<gloss>slave (person)</gloss>

I don't think the x-ref to レトロスペクティブ is necessary.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -10,2 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2540400">レトロスペクティブ</xref>
@@ -13 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>retrospective</gloss>

daij, 新和英中辞典, prog, Luminous, JST, etc.

@@ -10,0 +10,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -11,1 +12,1 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>retro</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>nostalgic</gloss>
+<gloss>old-fashioned</gloss>

i don't see this in this reference or any other.  e.g. meikyo just says しばらく, and this can certainly refer to multiple days as well.  i think the vague gloss was better

daijs

better?

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>rest</gloss>
+<gloss>rest (esp. a whole day)</gloss>

GG5, etc.

I feel it should be another sense but no reference splits.

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>convalescence</gloss>

From a school's bulletin board:
「盲腸手術の為、大沼先生休養」

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>recuperation</gloss>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daijs, koj

Added sense. (苦渋味 shows up in quite a few 特許庁 examples on weblio).
Don't agree with "difficulty in understanding".

@@ -19,2 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>mortification</gloss>
-<gloss>difficulty in understanding</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>pain</gloss>
+<gloss>anguish</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +24,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>bitterness and astringency</gloss>
+</sense>

I made a similar comment on the 避寒地 entry a while back. I think we should at least drop "summer resort".

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>summer resort</gloss>

yeah, i agree.  the "summer ..." glosses are not ideal.  ubiquitous but they should perhaps be nuked

Tried to resist, but I think one or two more literal glosses are helpful. Summer resorts/retreats aren't necessarily places you 
go to cool down. 避暑地 on google images gives you pictures of mountains, rivers, and mountain rivers, while "summer resort" is 
hotels with pools. A "summer resort" is more often than not a place you go to enjoy the hot weather, not a place you go to escape 
the hot weather.

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1484640">避暑</xref>
+<gloss>place that is cool in the summer</gloss>
+<gloss>place one goes to escape the heat of summer</gloss>

eij

eij, gg5

that wording does not seem to appear in the ref, but gg5 does have just 'sanitation'

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>handling of sanitation</gloss>
+<gloss>hygiene control</gloss>
+<gloss>sanitation</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=衛生管理

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>handling of sanitation</gloss>

gg5

Clean-up.

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>paltry sum of money</gloss>
+<gloss>small change</gloss>
@@ -19,2 +21 @@
-<gloss>loose change</gloss>
-<gloss>small (paltry) sum (of money)</gloss>
+<gloss>pittance</gloss>
@@ -22 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>(mere) pittance</gloss>

daij

Added kanji, reading and [restr] tag.

@@ -6,0 +7,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>頰杖</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>面杖</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +15,2 @@
+<re_restr>頬杖</re_restr>
+<re_restr>頰杖</re_restr>
@@ -11,0 +20,6 @@
+<re_restr>頬杖</re_restr>
+<re_restr>頰杖</re_restr>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>つらづえ</reb>
@@ -15,0 +30 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1603430">頬杖をつく</xref>
@@ -18,0 +34 @@
+<stagr>ほおづえ</stagr>
@@ -20,2 +36,3 @@
-<gloss>bracing (in building)</gloss>
-<gloss>support</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2619910">方杖</xref>
+<gloss>brace (in construction)</gloss>
+<gloss>angle brace</gloss>

Koj (mentions it as 旧仮名.)

A correspondent found it in the words of an 演歌.

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ほほづえ</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

yes, gg5 suggests "to be submitted" rather than "submitted".  eij has "deliverable" which may be best since it doesn't indicate anything about if it has already been submitted

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>documents to be presented</gloss>
+<gloss>work to be submitted</gloss>
@@ -14,2 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>documents to be presented</gloss>
-<gloss>work to be submitted</gloss>

I think it's fine as it is. It often refers to things that haven't been submitted yet.

Maybe?

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>submitted document</gloss>
+<gloss>submitted work</gloss>

gg5, prog

Don't like "exhibit".

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>exhibit</gloss>
-<gloss>documents for submission</gloss>
+<gloss>documents to be presented</gloss>
+<gloss>work to be submitted</gloss>

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1146810">ローマ字・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1146810">ローマ字・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1146810">ローマ字・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1146810">ローマ字・1</xref>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1146810">ローマ字・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1146810">ローマ字・2</xref>

Entry created

Not obsc.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<lsource xml:lang="haw"/>

Entry created

I'm seeing some examples of both.

gg5: はしたの　fractional; odd 《sum》; fragmentary.
meikyo: [名][形動] ある数量を基準として計算・計量したときの過不足の数量。
daijr, daijs（ 名 ・形動 ）: 計算の結果、ちょうどきりのよい数量を基準にしたときに現れる過不足の数量。 (etc.)

i'm inclined to leave it.  there is evidence of adj-no = fractional at least, and most sources call it 形動

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

daij

Sense 1 isn't [adj-na].

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -23 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>loose change</gloss>
+<gloss>odd money</gloss>
+<gloss>small change</gloss>

koj, daij, meikyo

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>端た</keb>
@@ -12,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +22,1 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -23,0 +28,1 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

I'm also reluctant to include this

I don't think we should start including ~
すぎる entries just based on them being 
common. It's possible the "excessive" 
sense in the すぎる entry should be moved 
higher up, though.

重過ぎる	42554
重すぎる	83802

複合動詞 can be a bit difficult in deciding whether to lexicalize or not, as they can be very compositional. JJ dictionaries often ignore them, but JEs tend to have more as it can help learners. In general the criteria I have used have been 
(a) is it very common? If you look at the ranked list via http://www.edrdg.org/~jwb/compv/ you'll see that even the kokugos have the very common ones.
(b) is it at all idiomatic? In this case it's the "excessive" sense of 過ぎる which we have as #6. I could imagine a beginner puzzling over "pass through heavy", which is why I think it's worth listing.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>重すぎる</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1195970">過ぎる・すぎる・6</xref>

Is there anything special about this particular combination? We don't have 高すぎる, 暑すぎる, 難しすぎる, etc.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>special] exhibition</gloss>
+<gloss>special exhibition</gloss>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>special] exhibition</gloss>
+<gloss>themed exhibition</gloss>

ddjs

gg5

ddjs

a surprising absence

gg5, daij, koj
G n-grams:
箸立て	7686
はし立て	2617

?

Koj: ペサーニャ【Camilo Pessanha】
  ポルトガル象徴派の詩人。作風はヴェルレーヌに類する。(1867-1926)