luminous, wisdom, daij
パッと	1,210,604	60.1%	
ぱっと	767,707	        38.1%	
パっと	36,564	        1.8%

I think sense 2 should have adverbial glosses.
I'm not seeing any vs examples for sense 1.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -17 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>quickly</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>swiftly</gloss>
@@ -23 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>alertly</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +27 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -27 +28,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -29,4 +30,6 @@
-<gloss>attractive</gloss>
-<gloss>distinguished</gloss>
-<gloss>showy</gloss>
-<gloss>catching</gloss>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>conspicuously</gloss>
+<gloss>prominently</gloss>
+<gloss>showily</gloss>
+<gloss>attractively</gloss>
+<gloss>impressively</gloss>

daijr ex: "ぱっと派手に繰り込もう
koj ex: "忘年会はぱっと派手にやろう"

Not always [vs].

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

gg5, prog, luminous

The JEs only have 〜する glosses.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -19 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -21,4 +21,3 @@
-<gloss>trembling</gloss>
-<gloss>getting nervous</gloss>
-<gloss>excited</gloss>
-<gloss>thrilled</gloss>
+<gloss>to be excited</gloss>
+<gloss>to be nervous</gloss>
+<gloss>to be thrilled</gloss>

ワックワク	3879

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ワックワク</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

トレーナー can't be wasei because it's a full English term already. It's not a Japanese construction. I've proposed an entry for 特用.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y"/>

Iwakoku says sense 02 is 日本での用法. Shinmeikai says 日本での特用.

We have quite a few entries (e.g. アフターケア, クイックモーション) where we have a lsrc tag on the second sense because it is wasei.
Until we have a better solution, we should probably keep the lsrc tag.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<lsource ls_wasei="y"/>

daij, koj
トレーナー	1,363,961	99.7%	
トレイナー	3,696	        0.3%	- not in my refs

lsrc tag not needed as it's not the first sense.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>trainer (someone who works with sports athletes)</gloss>
+<gloss>trainer (person who trains people or animals)</gloss>
@@ -17 +17,0 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">trainer</lsource>

OK, I'll split that off.

@@ -22,9 +21,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>まじ</stagr>
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2210140">まい</xref>
-<gloss>cannot</gloss>
-<gloss>should not</gloss>
-<gloss>will not</gloss>
-<gloss>must not</gloss>

[2] Should be split and have its tag changed from [aux-v] to [aux-adj,adj-shiku,arch].

@@ -19 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>serious (not capricious or flirtatious)</gloss>
+<gloss>serious</gloss>
+<gloss>not joking</gloss>
+<gloss>straight</gloss>

何が何でも	360532	70.1%
なにがなんでも	79864	15.5%
何がなんでも	69281	13.5%
なにが何でも	4289	0.8%

@@ -5,0 +6,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>何がなんでも</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>なにが何でも</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I agree. It's also the visible form in sankoku and daijirin.

"why" is redundant.
If we're keeping one kanji form visible, I think it should be 何故かと言うと.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>何故かいうと</keb>
+<keb>何故かと言うと</keb>
@@ -12 +12 @@
-<keb>何故かと言うと</keb>
+<keb>何故かいうと</keb>
@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>the reason is that ...</gloss>
@@ -22 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>the reason why is</gloss>

なぜかと言うと	55815	14.8%
何故かと言うと	38043	10.1%
なぜかというと	220108	58.3%
何故かというと	63769	16.9%

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>何故かいうと</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

google ngrams
なぜかというと	220108
なぜかと言うと	55815
何故かと言うと	38043

@@ -33 +33 @@
-<gloss>to do something over again</gloss>
+<gloss>to do over again</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 繰り返す　 │ 2,185,551 │ 93.8% │
│ くり返す　 │    61,581 │  2.6% │ - sK
│ 繰りかえす │     7,877 │  0.3% │ - sK
│ 繰返す　　 │    19,426 │  0.8% │ - sK
│ くりかえす │    55,968 │  2.4% │
├─ーーーーー─┼───────────┼───────┤
│ 繰り返し　 │ 7,939,586 │ 92.6% │
│ くり返し　 │   264,206 │  3.1% │
│ 繰りかえし │    20,255 │  0.2% │
│ 繰返し　　 │   147,654 │  1.7% │
│ くりかえし │   203,548 │  2.4% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Yes, plenty of を繰り返す examples there and elsewhere.

@@ -27,0 +27,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

It's also transitive. See the example sentences.

luminous

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>concurrently holding the position of</gloss>

[vt]: meikyo, sankoku, iwakoku, etc.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daijr, gg5
daijs: "また、その職務"

Not necessarily two posts. Aligning with 兼任.
Added sense.

@@ -17 +17,6 @@
-<gloss>holding two posts concurrently</gloss>
+<gloss>serving concurrently as</gloss>
+<gloss>holding the additional post of</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>additional post</gloss>

prog, luminous, daij

@@ -17,2 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>to help out of (trouble)</gloss>
-<gloss>to extricate</gloss>
+<gloss>to help (someone) out of trouble</gloss>
+<gloss>to rescue</gloss>
+<gloss>to save</gloss>

[vt]: koj

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 助け出す　 │ 33,046 │ 94.7% │
│ 助けだす　 │  1,424 │  4.1% │ - add, sK
│ 助だす　　 │    103 │  0.3% │
│ たすけ出す │     21 │  0.1% │
│ 助出す　　 │      0 │  0.0% │
│ たすけだす │    297 │  0.9% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>助けだす</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog, luminous

@@ -36,2 +36,4 @@
-<gloss>to finish</gloss>
-<gloss>to fulfill</gloss>
+<gloss>to achieve</gloss>
+<gloss>to complete</gloss>
+<gloss>to carry out</gloss>
+<gloss>to carry through</gloss>

〈成（し）／為（し）／なし／ナシ〉〈遂／と〉げ

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 成し遂げ │ 453,561 │ 91.5% │
│ なし遂げ │   9,170 │  1.8% │ - add, sK
│ 成しとげ │   4,389 │  0.9% │
│ 為し遂げ │   2,073 │  0.4% │
│ 成遂げ　 │     472 │  0.1% │ - add, sK (daijr, smk)
│ 為しとげ │     134 │  0.0% │
│ 為遂げ　 │      81 │  0.0% │
│ なしとげ │  26,046 │  5.3% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+<keb>なし遂げる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -15,0 +20,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>成遂げる</keb>

成し遂げる	144471	94.4%
成しとげる	1365	0.9%
為し遂げる	768	0.5% <- Daijs -  rK
なしとげる	6467	4.2%

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<keb>成しとげる</keb>
+<keb>為し遂げる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14 +15,2 @@
-<keb>為し遂げる</keb>
+<keb>成しとげる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

N-grams:
成し遂げる	144471
為し遂げる	768
成しとげる	1365

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>為し遂げる</keb>
+<keb>成しとげる</keb>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<keb>成しとげる</keb>
+<keb>為し遂げる</keb>

https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/otitis-media-middle-ear-infection-in-adults

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>middle-ear infection</gloss>

We no longer explain medical terms.

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>inflammation of the middle ear</gloss>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<field>&med;</field>
@@ -19 +20 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">inflammation of the middle ear</gloss>
+<gloss>inflammation of the middle ear</gloss>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>difficult to recover from illness</gloss>
+<gloss>difficult-to-recover-from illness</gloss>

GG5: 	a serious [an intractable] disease; a 「serious [bad] case.
中辞典: 〈不治の〉 an incurable disease; 〈難治の〉 an intractable disease; ┏a serious [an obstinate] case 《of malaria》.
ルミナス: (不治の病気) incurable disease; (命にかかわる) serious disease; (悪性の病気) malignant disease

I think there's just one sense. It's a fairly broad term.

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>serious disease</gloss>
+<gloss>intractable disease</gloss>
@@ -18,10 +19,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&med;</field>
-<gloss>an illness in which the cause and treatment is unknown</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&med;</field>
-<gloss>an illness in which the appropriate treatment requires long-term care</gloss>

1. 出典：デジタル大辞泉（小学館）
2. The entry above has a 補説 that also includes 3 bullet points from this source: https://www.pref.saitama.lg.jp/a0705/nanbyo/nanbyogaiyo.html

「難病」とは、2015年1月施行の「難病の患者に対する医療等に関する法律（難病法）」により1から3のとおり定義されています。ただし、がんや精神疾患、感染症、アレルギー疾患等、個別の施策体系があるものは含まれていません。

    発病の機構が明らかでない
    治療方法が確立していない希少な疾病である
    当該疾病にかかることにより長期にわたり療養を必要とすることとなるもの

The entry for "incurable" disease lead me to look it up in other monolingual dictionaries as "incurable" as a description or definition feels insufficient. It makes me believe it is a known disease that has no treatment or cure for it. 

I also included the tags [med] to denote it is related to medical terminology, I am not sure if this is appropriate.

@@ -16 +16,12 @@
-<gloss>incurable disease</gloss>
+<field>&med;</field>
+<gloss>difficult to recover from illness</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&med;</field>
+<gloss>an illness in which the cause and treatment is unknown</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&med;</field>
+<gloss>an illness in which the appropriate treatment requires long-term care</gloss>

gg5, reverso
発表会	2,519,065

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -12 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>recital (i.e. of music, by a pupil)</gloss>
+<gloss>(school) recital</gloss>
+<gloss>school concert</gloss>
+<gloss>class presentation</gloss>
@@ -16 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>presentation (e.g. product launch)</gloss>
+<gloss>presentation (for a new product, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>announcement event</gloss>
+<gloss>launch event</gloss>

I think this is sufficient.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>winning by decision (as opposed to knockout, disqualification, submission, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>winning by decision (in combat sports)</gloss>

More idiomatic.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>winning by points</gloss>
+<gloss>winning on points</gloss>

gg5 says "winning on points."
sankoku:
〘ボクシングなど〙決定的な勝敗がつかないとき、審判が優勢と認めたほうを勝ちとすること。（↔判定負け）

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decisions_in_combat_sports
>> In combat sports, a decision is a result of the fight or bout that does not end in a knockout, submission or other finish, in which the (usually) three judges' scorecards are consulted to determine the winner; a majority of judges must agree on a result.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>winning a decision</gloss>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>winning by decision (as opposed to knockout, disqualification, submission, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>winning by points</gloss>

goo

This gloss is wrong but I don't have a better one.

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo
飛び出す	657,303	97.3%	
飛びだす	9,042	1.3%	
飛出す	2,107	0.3%	
跳び出す	1,092	0.2%	
跳びだす	571	0.1%	
とび出す	5,482	0.8%

I'm not seeing "butt in" in my refs.
Although sense 4 takes を, it's still considered intransitive (like 出る in 部屋を出る).
Added sense.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +24,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>とび出す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -31,0 +40,3 @@
+<gloss>to leap out</gloss>
+<gloss>to fly out</gloss>
+<gloss>to run out</gloss>
@@ -33 +44 @@
-<gloss>to fly out</gloss>
+<gloss>to bolt out</gloss>
@@ -38,0 +50,2 @@
+<gloss>to emerge</gloss>
+<gloss>to come out</gloss>
@@ -44,0 +58,2 @@
+<gloss>to jut out</gloss>
+<gloss>to stick out</gloss>
@@ -49 +64,4 @@
-<gloss>to butt in</gloss>
+<s_inf>as ...を飛び出す</s_inf>
+<gloss>to leave (a company, one's hometown, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to run away (from home)</gloss>
+<gloss>to cut ties with</gloss>
@@ -53,4 +71,2 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>to run away (e.g. from home)</gloss>
-<gloss>to break away</gloss>
-<gloss>to cut ties with (e.g. workplace)</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to start flying</gloss>

GG5 sense 3.

大辞林 ⑥
大辞泉 ⑤

@@ -50,0 +51,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to run away (e.g. from home)</gloss>
+<gloss>to break away</gloss>
+<gloss>to cut ties with (e.g. workplace)</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1520620">頬っぺ</xref>

Quiet

頬っぺた	11900	5.6%  <- KOD JEs, my 5th ed Koj, etc.
頰っぺた	0	0.0%
頬っ辺	0	0.0% <- my old Daijirin, etc.
頰っ辺	0	0.0% <- the newer Daijisen
ほっぺた	199575	94.4%

When this kanji was added to the 常用漢字 the 頰 version was used - it had only recently come available via Unicode. 頬 had been around for years before then.
How are we going to handle the 頰 versions, which are still rather rare? I guess we have to make them [rK] and keep them visible.
BTW, I wrote an article about 頬/頰 some years ago: https://www.joyokanji.com/content/tale-two-kanji-or-perhaps-only-one-kanji

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Daijr

Kana-only gets 10 times the hits.
I'm tempted to put "oK" on the ones using 頰, but mirabile dictu it's 頰 that's been added to the 常用漢字; not 頬.

@@ -7,0 +7,9 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>頰っぺた</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>頬っ辺</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>頰っ辺</keb>
@@ -16,0 +25,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

daijr/s, smk, shinkoku

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 脈打つ │ 30,670 │ 96.4% │
│ 脈搏つ │     32 │  0.1% │
│ 脈うつ │  1,120 │  3.5% │
╰─ーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>脈搏つ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>脈うつ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

kenkyusha 新英和大辞典

I realised there was no "pulsate" entry.

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<gloss>to pulsate</gloss>

A couple of JEs use it in examples for that sense of 済ます. May as well staty.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1295030">済ます・3</xref>

なしで済ます	398	46.2%
無しで済ます	213	24.7%
無しですます	0	0.0%
なしですます	250	29.0%

Does this nees to b an entry?

Tanaka: 3 examples of 無しですます
G n-grams;
 なしで済ませ	656
 無しで済ませ	463
 無しですませ	　79

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>無しですます</keb>

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>なしで済ます</keb>
+</k_ele>

Maybe it's appropriate, but I wonder if [aux-v] is needed as well.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&cop;</pos>

Since だ is explicitly listed as an equivalence, a reader will likely subconsciously infer that it is a copula regardless of how well they are acquainted with the term, I will agree it is not strictly necessary.
However, I think it should be included for the sake of consistency rather than necessity: なり is ラ変, it is a 助動詞, and it is a copula; to not include all of them is arbitrary and undermines the purpose of the tag: if things will not have a tag when it applies, why have a tag at all?

No need to signal "arch" twice in a sense. I don't think [cop] is needed.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&cop;</pos>
@@ -16 +15 @@
-<s_inf>archaic equivalent of 〜だ、〜である</s_inf>
+<s_inf>equiv. of 〜だ、〜である</s_inf>

daijs, daijr

Adding copula tag to sense [1]. Changing notes as I do not think saying "affirmative" does much to paint clear picture of what it does by itself, nor do I think it is a term the reader can research and come back with the correct result. 
Minor changes to [2].

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&cop;</pos>
@@ -15 +16 @@
-<s_inf>affirmative; meaning 〜だ、〜である</s_inf>
+<s_inf>archaic equivalent of 〜だ、〜である</s_inf>
@@ -25 +26 @@
-<gloss>to be (location)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be (at a location)</gloss>

👍

gg5, prog, daij
駆け出す	38,398	94.5%	
駆けだす	1,324	3.3%	
駈け出す	433	1.1%	
駆出す	401	1.0%	
駈出す	71	0.2%

Splitting into senses.

@@ -10 +10,2 @@
-<keb>駆けだす</keb>
+<keb>駈け出す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13 +14,2 @@
-<keb>駈け出す</keb>
+<keb>駆けだす</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +19 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19,0 +23 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -29 +33,8 @@
-<gloss>to run off</gloss>
+<gloss>to run out</gloss>
+<gloss>to rush out</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to start running</gloss>
+<gloss>to begin to run</gloss>
@@ -31 +41,0 @@
-<gloss>to start running</gloss>

n-grams (for 〜した)

added 駆けだす

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<keb>駆出す</keb>
+<keb>駆けだす</keb>
@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>駆出す</keb>

daij

Not a noun.

@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -34 +32,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 確かな　 │ 2,087,868 │ 94.2% │
│ 確な　　 │    30,977 │  1.4% │
│ 慥かな　 │       148 │  0.0% │ - rK (daijr, meikyo, etc.)
│ たしかな │    96,426 │  4.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Rearranged the Tatoeba indices.

daij - 確 is io
gg5, prog, eij, etc. for gloss changes

not sure sense 1 and 2 really need to be split.  all waeis do so, some have more splitting

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -23 +24 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -25 +26 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>sure</gloss>
@@ -27 +28 @@
-<gloss>sure</gloss>
+<gloss>positive</gloss>
@@ -30,0 +32,12 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>reliable</gloss>
+<gloss>trustworthy</gloss>
+<gloss>safe</gloss>
+<gloss>sound</gloss>
+<gloss>firm</gloss>
+<gloss>accurate</gloss>
+<gloss>correct</gloss>
+<gloss>exact</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -32,2 +45,3 @@
-<gloss>if I'm not mistaken</gloss>
-<gloss>if I remember correctly</gloss>
+<gloss>If I'm not mistaken</gloss>
+<gloss>If I remember correctly</gloss>
+<gloss>If I remember rightly</gloss>

追っかける	67,427		
追っかけて	215,892		
追っかけた	13,210

Not common enough for spec1 or spec2. I suggest keeping the news/nf tags and moving them to 追っかける.

@@ -6 +6,2 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>nf06</ke_pri>
@@ -13 +14,2 @@
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>nf06</re_pri>
@@ -17,0 +20 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1608720">追いかける・1</xref>

No problem dropping it here.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 追っかけて │ 215,892 │ 89.9% │
│ 追っ掛けて │   4,989 │  2.1% │
│ 追ッかけて │      32 │  0.0% │
│ 追ッ掛けて │      24 │  0.0% │
│ おっかけて │  19,140 │  8.0% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

Are the [news] priority tags needed? The 掛 form seems to be a bit uncommon. Could be tagged [rK].

@@ -10,2 +9,0 @@
-<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf06</ke_pri>
@@ -15,2 +12,0 @@
-<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf06</re_pri>

OK.

Like this?

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,6 +12,0 @@
-<re_restr>二段ベッド</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>にだんベット</reb>
-<re_restr>二段ベット</re_restr>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

I think -ト should be hidden, that's what I've done for the other 20-ish entries with ベッド in them. Setting up restrictions for all of them seems like unnecessary work. Splitting all of them into 2 entries, as well.

In that case, I think it's useful to have the corresponding reading tagged as irregular as well.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

Probably best to revert to the old restrictions and keep it as the one entry.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<re_restr>二段ベッド</re_restr>
@@ -16 +17 @@
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+<re_restr>二段ベット</re_restr>

With にだんベット hidden, 二段ベット needs to be hidden as well. Otherwise the reading is wrong. If we want it to be visible, I think it should be a separate entry.

Aligning with Robin's edit on 判定勝ち

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>losing by decision (as opposed to knockout, disqualification, submission, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>losing by decision (in combat sports)</gloss>

Aligning with 判定勝ち・1478670

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>losing a decision (on points)</gloss>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>losing by decision (as opposed to knockout, disqualification, submission, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>losing on points</gloss>

gg5, prog
ひとかどの人物	2,125	76.4%	
一角の人物	524	18.8%	
一廉の人物	132	4.7%	
一かどの人物	0	0.0%

The JEs, sankoku and smk only have one sense.
The "one matter/field" sense appears to be obsolete.
Chujiten uses 一かど in its examples.

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>一かど</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -20,3 +24,5 @@
-<gloss>a cut above the rest</gloss>
-<gloss>superior</gloss>
-<gloss>something uncommon</gloss>
+<gloss>considerable</gloss>
+<gloss>decent</gloss>
+<gloss>respectable</gloss>
+<gloss>full-fledged</gloss>
+<gloss>fully fledged</gloss>
@@ -25 +31 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -27,2 +33,2 @@
-<gloss>respectable</gloss>
-<gloss>full-fledged</gloss>
+<gloss>suitably</gloss>
+<gloss>reasonably</gloss>
@@ -32 +38,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
+<gloss>one matter</gloss>
@@ -34,6 +40,0 @@
-<gloss>one matter</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>suitably</gloss>
-<gloss>reasonably</gloss>

@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

daijirin

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -23,2 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>respectable</gloss>
-<gloss>full-fledged</gloss>
@@ -30 +27,7 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>respectable</gloss>
+<gloss>full-fledged</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

GG5 has this as an example sentence, but it's not otherwise noteworthy.

There's already a similar priority sentence indexed to sense 01 of 司る.
  市長は市政を司る。| The mayor administers the affairs of the city.

I couldn't find any guidelines for deletion, but I feel like this entry is extraneous and self explanatory. It doesn't seem to be particularly special either and has no entries in other dictionaries.

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

I don't see a need for it.

7k in the ngrams

Not really needed, I don't think

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>established (certain) fact</gloss>
+<gloss>established fact</gloss>
+<gloss>certain fact</gloss>

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>negative prefix</gloss>

寄航地	625	1.2%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

GG5

existing entry 寄港 has alternate form 寄航, as confirmed by GG5. for 寄港地, GG5 does not explicitly mention the other form, 寄航地, which I encountered in a recent novel.. 

寄港地	49785
寄航地	625

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>寄航地</keb>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Extremely proeuctive prefix

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>

〈無／无〉に〈帰する／する／なる〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────╮
│ 無にする　 │ 18,806 │
│ 無になる　 │ 14,219 │
│ 無に帰する │  3,875 │
│ 无にする　 │      0 │
│ 无になる　 │      0 │
│ 无に帰する │      0 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Hard to justify....

I don't think either is needed. This is overly compositional. 一体何 is A+B.

I've suggested an entry for 一体何/いったい何. I that is accepted, this can prbably be dropped.

Looks like an example sentence to me.

Entry created

daijr: 古くは「くくもる」
I don't see a reference for 曇る here. Not even nikk has it. I think we should drop it.

The kokugos identify the voice or the sound as the subject of this verb ("声が…", "音が…").

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>曇る</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +6,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>くくもる</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
@@ -13,6 +13,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to mumble</gloss>
-<gloss>to mutter</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>to be mumbled</gloss>
+<gloss>to be muttered</gloss>

daij

in daijirin, くぐもる refers to 籠もる, which has as one meaning 'to be muffled'. in the book I'm reading, くぐもる is used to describe a voice that is 'muffled' by wearing a full protection suit.

@@ -16,0 +17,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be muffled</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

I think 曇った would be read くもった. That form is probably incorrect.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>曇った声</keb>

N-grams

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>曇った声</keb>

n-grams
くぐもった声	1322

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

Entry created

Daijirin also  has ひだたくみ as a reading.

飛〈騨／驒〉（の）〈匠／工／巧み／たくみ／タクミ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 飛騨の匠　　 │ 8,770 │ 88.5% │
│ 飛騨匠　　　 │   714 │  7.2% │ - add (daijr)
│ 飛騨の工　　 │   167 │  1.7% │
│ 飛騨工　　　 │   206 │  2.1% │ - add (daijr)
│ 飛騨のたくみ │    57 │  0.6% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -6,0 +7,9 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>飛騨匠</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>飛騨の工</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>飛騨工</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +19,5 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ひだたくみ</reb>
+<re_restr>飛騨匠</re_restr>
+<re_restr>飛騨工</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>historical system whereby the Hida region provided the central government 10 carpenters per village in place of taxes</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>system whereby the Hida region provided the central government 10 carpenters per village in place of taxes</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>historical system whereby the Hida region provided 10 carpenters per village the central government in place of taxes</gloss>
+<gloss>historical system whereby the Hida region provided the central government 10 carpenters per village in place of taxes</gloss>

Entry created

つまらない物ですが	2349	13.2%
詰まらない物ですが	54	0.3%
詰らない物ですが	0	0.0%
つまらないものですが	15350	86.5%

I don't think we ned to inckude rK forms for set phrases/longer expressions even if they're in a kokugo (not sure which form is in koj)

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I was going to suggest deleting this but it's in kojien surprisingly.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<misc>&pol;</misc>
+<misc>&hum;</misc>
@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>it's not much, but...</gloss>
+<gloss>it's not much, but ...</gloss>

@@ -20,2 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>It's not much, but...</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">phrase used when giving gifts</gloss>
+<s_inf>said when giving a gift</s_inf>
+<gloss>it's not much, but...</gloss>

@@ -19,1 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>"It's not much, but..." (phrase often used when giving gifts)</gloss>
+<misc>&pol;</misc>
+<gloss>It's not much, but...</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">phrase used when giving gifts</gloss>

Entry created

ますです体	0	0.0%
ますですたい	496	100.0%

first non jmdict spawn googit I get is actually あざますですたい(

Only a couple of non-dictionary hits for ますです体, but plenty for ますですたい. Clearly ですます体/です体 are the primary forms.

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

nobody use this word nor variation of ですます体.

Entry created

Thanks for the comments.
We could have extended discussions on where and how to represent morphology and etymology, but these comments are NOT the appropriate forum. Please feel free to raise an issue in the Github forum if you wish. 
https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Issues_Forum

This is strictly morphology that the reader can apply to their use of the language, for example: knowing it is made from ん and what ん derives from allows them to correctly predict the existence of ませぬ - or - if someone learns of ぬ through ません and learns from ぬ's entry its function/meaning and how it is morphologically added to other words, then they would be equipped to locate and understand every single instance of ぬ or ん they find from thereon, as well as to use it themselves. Is this not a benefit for the reader?
This is in line with the editorial policy that lists "where there is a derivational relationship between words that it is useful to highlight, e.g. between かっけー and 格好いい, or between オケる and 空オケ." as a cross-reference that can enhance the value of the entry; this is fundamentally the same as the given examples - and with ぬ being a productive morpheme, morphology notes and references would be even more useful.
Now, I do agree that it is not all etymology and/or morphology that should be added: here there is a positive impact for the learner's understanding and practice. Contrast this with something such as adding "changed over time from まゐらす to まらする, まする, culminating in ます" to the ます entry. The latter would be a truly useless historical etymology that does not help readers to understand what something means, how it comes to mean it, nor how to use it.


I understand that the dictionary is not here to teach morphology, but it is here to teach Japanese and morphology just cannot not be useful in such a highly agglutinative language - in fact, it is not only useful, it is required for its use: it is the necessity of morphology that led you to add "after the -masu stem of a verb" to this very entry, it is morphology that dictates we have separate verb classes and it is morphology that distinguishes verbs from adjectives and tells you how to use each. 
If we are ignoring any mention of etymological and/or morphological information and concern ourselves only with self-contained semantic/functional minimalism, we might as well remove: the left half of the note in this entry along with all 3 cross-references, the cross-reference to 格好いい in かっけー, as well as any other similarly substantiated note or reference in any and all entries. We could even remove the tags for 動詞 and 形容詞 and neatly bundle them under a category for 述語 since that is the all-encompassing superset. Nonetheless, I think you will agree that would make the dictionary less useful as it would lose much of its power to teach usage - which directly affects ability to teach identification and thus, comprehension - and completely lose any information about derivative connections, all because of morphology and etymology.

Do you believe that usage, identification, and relations are not something that a cross-linguistic dictionary should seek to teach? Is it not what the reader seeks to learn? If you do think so, then what does it seek to teach? Raw semantic correspondence? If you give yourself the bother to think about these questions, consider: Every time someone conjugates something, they are engaging with morphology. Every time you add an [adj] tag to something, you are teaching them about it.

Since we're not attempting to explain the etymology.

How would the cross-reference to ん be redundant? As it is, there is no way for one to know that the ん in ません is the negative ぬ・ん from simply looking at this entry.

I agree with Robin on the etymology, etc. The xref to ん is quite redundant.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2139720">ん・3</xref>

I agree.

I don't personally think this is needed either. I wouldn't mind seeing several of the othrt そうなんです etc. entries go either.

そうなんですけどねぇ	4217
そうなんですけどね	42058
そうなんですけど	178899
そうなんです	3609041  <- currently an entry
そうなんですか	715872  <- currently an entry
Reverso

The original was from EIjiro. Maybe the shorter and more common version is worth having.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>そうなんですけどねぇ</reb>
+<reb>そうなんですけど</reb>
@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<gloss>that's right, but ...</gloss>

Smells like an example sentence

Entry created

I don't think the extra part of the note is needed.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<s_inf>after the -nai stem of a verb; negates verbs in non-past tense</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after the -nai stem of a verb</s_inf>

A Consideration that occurred when editing the entry for させる, using -nai stem for the usage note in this verb will most likely lead the reader to incorrectly believe that it connects to する as しぬ, rather than せぬ.
Perhaps the term -nai stem for this entry should be replaced with 未然形, though that makes it ambiguous as　五段 have お and あ and サ変 have さ、し、せ and arguably しょ.
Maybe changing it to "after せ～ form of suru class verbs or -nai stem of other verbs; negates verbs in non-past tense" would address the issue?

daijs, daijr

Removing 2 as it should be its own entry: they have different meanings, conjugation paradigms and etymologies; added note to better describe function.

Questioning: Is the suffix tag on auxiliaries that formally connect a to verb stem and are never added after nouns/nominals necessary? 
Looking at the definition for 接尾語 in daijs,  meikyo and daijr, the defining characteristic of a 接尾語 seems to be whether or not they can be attached directly to 体言 or things applicable to them(such as the root of an adjective or adjectival verb). 
For example, the 助動詞 らしい is listed as connecting to the 終止形 of adjectives and verbs as well as to 体言 in both daijs and daijr, but the らしい registered as a 接尾語 says only「名詞・副詞，または形容動詞の語幹などに付いて...」(Note: quote is from daijr which does not nominally cite adjective roots but daijs does).
It is possible that a revision for the criteria for the suffix tag is in order.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<s_inf>after the -nai stem of a verb</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after the -nai stem of a verb; negates verbs in non-past tense</s_inf>
@@ -13,6 +12,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>indicates completion</gloss>

OK.

removing superfluous xref (rather than fixing it - it should 
be [3] if my edit to ん goes through)

@@ -11,3 +10,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2210320">ません</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2139720">ん・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2139720">ん・2</xref>

Indeed.

I agree. It's just なんで + よ.

Top 10 N-grams Lookup for なんでよっ (Frequency Order)
なんでよっ	1172	  
なんでよっぽど	248	  
なんでよっ	182	  
なんでよっ	133	  
なんでよって	116	  
なんでよって	104	  
なんでよっす	73	  
なんでよっぽどの	72	  
なんでよっすぃ	63	  
なんでよっちゃ	61	  
なんでよっちゃん	61	 

includinf it an sK can lead to misparsing

Not convinced this needs to be an entry.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>何でよ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -7,3 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>なんでよっ</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -12,4 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>Why?</gloss>
-<gloss>Why not?</gloss>
-<gloss>What for?</gloss>
-<gloss>What's wrong?</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>why?</gloss>
+<gloss>why not?</gloss>
+<gloss>what for?</gloss>
+<gloss>what's wrong?</gloss>

- zero n-grams for the version with the large つ
- this seems very A+B to me.
(I can't find a context where it could mean 'what's wrong' though)

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>なんでよつ</reb>
+<reb>なんでよ</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

@@ -5,0 +6,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ご機嫌如何ですか</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>御機嫌如何ですか</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12 +19,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

ご機嫌いかがですか	14186	61.2%
ごきげんいかがですか	6621	28.6%
御機嫌如何ですか	373	1.6%
ご機嫌如何ですか	1999	8.6%

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>How are you?</gloss>
+<gloss>how are you?</gloss>

Entry created

いかがお過ごしでしょうか is an entry.

Top 10 N-grams Lookup for いかがお過ごし (Frequency Order)
いかがお過ごし	633083	  
いかがお過ごしでしょ	329957	  
いかがお過ごしでしょう	327609	  
いかがお過ごしでしょうか	317990	  
いかがお過ごしです	205681	  
いかがお過ごしですか	202067	  
いかがお過ごしでし	53663	  
いかがお過ごしでした	52677	  
いかがお過ごしでしたか	38780	  
いかがお過ごしで	9484	  
いかがお過ごしだっ	7192

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>How are things with you?</gloss>
-<gloss>How are you doing?</gloss>
+<misc>&pol;</misc>
+<gloss>how are things with you?</gloss>
+<gloss>how are you doing?</gloss>

Eijiro, etc.

It's a conjunction in all the kokugos.
I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1188710">なぜかというと</xref>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<gloss>the reason is that ...</gloss>
@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>the reason why is</gloss>

Let's say [exp].

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

何となれば	9929	51.6%
なんとなれば	9320	48.4%

is conj right? 何故かというと is exp

スーパー大辞林

daijs daijr

True.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">auxiliary verb indicating the causative voice</gloss>
+<gloss>auxiliary verb indicating the causative voice</gloss>
@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">auxiliary verb indicating the granting of permission to do something</gloss>
+<gloss>auxiliary verb indicating the granting of permission to do something</gloss>
@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">auxiliary verb used as an honorific for others' actions</gloss>
+<gloss>auxiliary verb used as an honorific for others' actions</gloss>

This is not how we use [expl] - it's for explanatory _glosses_, not explanations of glosses.

I think this is OK.

daijs, daijr

Previous note had the following issues: 
1. Made no mention of せる connecting to サ変 nor of させる connecting to カ変 and to the original 未然形 of サ変.
2. Using the term imperfective form to refer to the 未然形 is not good idea as the same term is sometimes used to refer to verbs in the non-past form.
   I have tried to address both of the above issues by adding a mention to カ変 and changing the terminology to -nai stem where applicable.  However, I felt the need to try to specify the inflection for サ変 as -nai stem does not clearly indicate さ nor せ, and saying irrealis or 未然形 would leave it ambiguous between 2-4 options.

3. In "Senses 1-3 can be abbreviated as す" the "Senses 1-3" part can be removed as those are all senses in the entry. I have chosen to remove that altogether as this can be addressed with an entry for the abbreviation itself, similar to how it is done with ねー for ない.

4. The description of the させる・せる that means permission found in [2] is misleading as "having been granted" only applies to させられる, させてもらう, and their like: causative-passive or causative-benefactive constructions. This is a problem as the meaning of permission occurs even when せる・させる is by itself: 食べさせる can be someone physically forcing someone to eat, or it could just be someone giving someone food or allowing then to do so by some others means.
I have changed its definition accordingly and have also removed the note as keeping those examples without examples of せる・させる used in isolation may lead readers to believe that causative-passive/benefactive constructions are only causative constructions. I have also removed the [hum] tag as the permissive sense is not inherently humble and I imagine it was only there due to the aforementioned conflation of this meaning with causative-benefactive forms.

Minor changes: changed "causative" to "causative voice" so readers may more easily research the term if needed, and changed ～あら(さ)せられる to あら〜せられる as both options cannot exist simultaneously and I doubt that who wrote this intended the verb to be 荒らす.
 
Notes: Though せさせる for サ変 is all but gone from modern standard Japanese, the forms ぜさせる and ぜられる are still considered the grammatically correct forms for the derived ザ変 verbs; however, those forms are extremely rare as ずる verbs have been supplanted by their じる counterparts and are infrequent themselves, albeit not yet gone.
Aside from that, I opted to use サ変 and カ変 instead of "suru/kuru class" in order to slightly shorten the usage note.

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<s_inf>せる is for 五段 verbs, させる for 一段; follows the imperfective form of (v5) and (vs) verbs; senses 1-3 of せる are sometimes abbreviated as 〜す</s_inf>
-<gloss g_type="expl">auxiliary verb indicating the causative</gloss>
+<s_inf>～せる connects to -nai stem of 五段 verbs and to サ変 as さ～せる; ～させる connects to -nai stem of 一段 and カ変 verbs and to サ変 as せ～させる</s_inf>
+<gloss g_type="expl">auxiliary verb indicating the causative voice</gloss>
@@ -19,3 +19 @@
-<misc>&hum;</misc>
-<s_inf>usu. as 〜(さ)せてもらう, 〜(さ)せていただく, etc.</s_inf>
-<gloss g_type="expl">auxiliary verb indicating that one has been granted the permission to do something</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">auxiliary verb indicating the granting of permission to do something</gloss>
@@ -27 +25 @@
-<s_inf>as 〜(さ)せられる, 〜あら(さ)せられる, 〜(さ)せ給う, etc.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>as 〜(さ)せられる, あら〜せられる, 〜(さ)せ給う, etc.</s_inf>

OK.

smk: 何の苦労もないままにいきなり（厳しい）社会に出る様子。「苦労人だから、――出てきた若造とはわけが違う」

smk has a separate sense for the ぱっと in those yourei examples.
I think it's more or less covered by our sense 3.

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>suddenly (appearing, jumping out, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>suddenly (appearing, coming out, etc.)</gloss>

I can't really derive an edit from those comments from several days ago. Unless someone suggests something in detail, I'll just close this.

I'm not sure "jumping out" works that well (I guess it's from daijirin?)

daijisen and the jlogos dictionary (benesse) use the word 現れる, and daijisen's example is 「考えがぽっと浮かぶ」

here's another example where none of the senses really work:
バンドを解散してからソロでなかなか実績があがらず
芸能界もここまでかと言う時に
ぽっと出た、新人とのユニットの話
at first I thought it was similar to daijisen's example (if it modifies 話) but the more I think the more it seems to be a reference to ぽっと出 (if it modifies 新人)

I also tried scouring yourei.jp for more examples but the vast majority are senses 1 & 2. the remaining ones that seem to confirm my hypothesis are 東京に、ぽっと出たわたし / 田舎町からぽっと出てきた青年 / 九州の田舎からぽっと人形町の叔母の家に来て

there might be a fifth sense?

daijr, meikyo
ポッと	47,857	18.8%	
ぽっと	207,211	81.2%

I think only the last sense is vs.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>ポッと</reb>
+<reb>ぽっと</reb>
@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<reb>ぽっと</reb>
+<reb>ポッと</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -12 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -24 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -26 +24 @@
-<gloss>suddenly (coming, appearing)</gloss>
+<gloss>suddenly (appearing, jumping out, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -32,0 +31,2 @@
+<gloss>absentmindedly</gloss>
+<gloss>vacantly</gloss>

なんでやねん	233944	89.2%
何でやねん	28203	10.8%

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>何でやねん</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Probably.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<pos>&int;</pos>

Should this be [int]?

My younger grandson is very fond of "what the heck!".

This isn't exactly foul language. I think "what the hell?" conveys the tone well enough.

@@ -10,2 +10,3 @@
-<gloss>what the heck</gloss>
-<gloss>what are you going on about</gloss>
+<gloss>what the hell?</gloss>
+<gloss>what are you going on about?</gloss>
+<gloss>what the hell are you doing?</gloss>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>what the fuck</gloss>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2850980">アルゼンチン人</xref>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────╮
│ 亜人　 │ 24,544 │
│ アじん │      0 │ - drop
│ あじん │  5,798 │
╰─ーーー─┴────────╯

I get that the アじん reading was added due to the ateji nature of 亜 for the second and third senses. By that logic I think we'd want to split those senses into a separate entry. I say we just drop it; we don't have アこく as a reading in our entry for 亜国.

@@ -8,3 +7,0 @@
-<reb>アじん</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -14 +10,0 @@
-<stagr>あじん</stagr>

https://www.nikkeyshimbun.jp/2016/161012-71colonia.html
https://www.nikkeyshimbun.jp/2016/160914-61colonia.html

@@ -20,0 +21,6 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>Argentinian (person)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

I would question what the typical user is like, what they look for when using a dictionary, and whether the first two questions can be reliably answered at all.

Anyhow, disregard the morphology for a moment, I feel the functional aspects of the explanatory gloss and the [conj] tag were overlooked. There is nothing in the entry to suggest that ず is a conjunction, and not treating it as one will yield the wrong understanding of a phrase. 

The translation "Not doing" is a progressive negation while ず is a negation, a conjunction, and only progressive if the structure it is negating is. "Not" is a closer translation, but is still missing the conjunction part.
Going off of this entry as is, one could very well take a 食べず as "not eating" instead of "does not/will not eat and..."
Furthermore, with only an [aux-v] tag, a reader will most likely think this is the 連体形・終止形 dictionary form that ends a sentence or pre-modifies a noun. This is only worsened by ず ending with a -u, which is usually a characteristic of those forms.
That is not good as treating it as the dictionary form will analyse something such as「驚きもせず私達をながく見つめていた」with 驚きもせず as a premodifier for 私達. 

I tried to to address this with the notes on the 連用形, the tag and the explanatory gloss, I can see why all at once may seem superfluous but hold that at least one is required to solve the matter.
I will insist on the addition of the tag and the explanatory note, with the latter either as a complement or substitute for the translation as "not doing" does not do a good job of relaying what this word does. 
If nothing else, at least the tag should be kept since it is what the word is - but the note instead of or along with the translation could be immediately useful to anyone who does not know what a conjunction is.

As for morphology: it already occupies a place in many entries, notes like the -nai stem note here are morphological in nature and I can only imagine these are accepted while others are not as they allow identification through the morphology of the surrounding items. 
With that standard in mind, since the current entry runs into the suru class -nai stem problem of leaving a reader unable to identify せず and instead implicating しず, I propose changes to it in line with what was done to せる・させる.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -11,2 +12,3 @@
-<s_inf>after the -nai stem of a verb</s_inf>
-<gloss>not doing</gloss>
+<s_inf>connects to -nai stem of 五段, 一段 and カ変 verbs and to サ変 as せ～ず</s_inf>
+<gloss>not</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">negates a verb and continues onto next sentence</gloss>

I don't think the proposed revision is very useful to the typical user of this dictionary. There may be scope somewhere for detailed etymological and morphological information about these sorts of terms, but I don't think this is the place.
I'm reverting the entry to the 2016 original so that the comments remain visible. I'll reopen it for a while in case there is further discussion.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -14,11 +13,2 @@
-<s_inf>連用形 of ～ぬ acting as a conjunction</s_inf>
-<gloss g_type="expl">used to negate a verb and continue onto next sentence</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2441300">ぬ・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2441300">ぬ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2441300">ぬ</xref>
-<misc>&form;</misc>
-<s_inf>used at sentence end; old 終止形 of ～ぬ</s_inf>
-<gloss>not</gloss>
+<s_inf>after the -nai stem of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>not doing</gloss>

After some consideration, the translation on [1] should be changed as conjunctive ず is not properly represented by it: this ず conflates coordination and negation into a single morpheme, english has no such morpheme and thus lacks a direct translation. I have considered something such as "does/will not... and..." but that seemed confusing without an example sentence so I opted for an explanatory definition that is, hopefully, clear enough.

I realise I have forgotten to say why I have removed the notes on connection: I did so as I assume the notes will compel a reader to click the cross-reference to ぬ, leading them to learn that from there.

An additional idea that came to mind: this entry could be merged with ぬ by adding ず as a reading and adding this glossary to its, it would only need a few "as ～ず" or "as ～ぬ" to be added to the notes, the same could be done with ん. This practice could be applied to merge other entries that are variations of the same thing and with that trim down the number of individual entries with the benefit of consolidating currently scattered items under their corresponding set.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>not</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">used to negate a verb and continue onto next sentence</gloss>

The notes only do two things: tell you what it is and tell you what it does. Do you presuppose that a reader does not wish to know either or neither of these things?
Of course shoving 連用形 or "conjunction" in there will not automatically allow them to directly download information concerning those concepts unto their brain, I truly hope you did not think this to have been my intent. 
The terms are put there so that the reader may research them on their own, they can even be researched back with this dictionary if someone wishes to research through translation. Could you construct an argument against these points, so that we can have a productive discussion and make a better entry?
The information is not there to "cater to grammar nerds" as you so creatively put, it is there to teach the language: grammar plays an important part of second-language acquisition for many, especially adults, even more so when there is such a disparity between the structures of Japanese and several Indo-European languages. Did you learn Japanese without studying any form of grammar? I would doubt that unless you grew up using Japanese.

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2830785">国際連合教育科学文化機関・こくさいれんごうきょういくかがくぶんかきかん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2830785">国際連合教育科学文化機関</xref>
+<gloss>UNESCO</gloss>
@@ -11 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>UNESCO</gloss>

"n-pr" to "n" conversion.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<pos>&n-pr;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2830785">国際連合教育科学文化機関・こくさいれんごうきょういくかがくぶんかきかん</xref>

@@ -9,2 +9 @@
-<misc>&organization;</misc>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization</gloss>
@@ -12 +10,0 @@
-<gloss>United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization</gloss>

I know this word is already in enamdict but it appears so often in the news that I think should have an entry in the main dictionary as well.

I don't think there's a case for [adj-f]. The etymology is not really appropriate here.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -13 +12 @@
-<s_inf>attributive form of き, auxiliary verb indicating directly experienced or factual past; roughly equivalent to modern 〜た</s_inf>
+<s_inf>equiv. of modern 〜た</s_inf>

daijr, daijs, meikyo

Added [adj-f] as し is 連体形. Edited notes to include more information with the intent of avoiding potential confusion.

I would also like to include how it connects to verbs but き has irregular coupling methods to both サ変 and カ変 verbs that I fear would leave the entry too long and not including them might make it seem like it does not do so at all; Apologies if this is the wrong place to ask but has something such as a section that includes the inflection paradigms of irregular verbs as well as notes on more specific irregularities such as these ever been considered? Items that would benefit from this would be honorifics such as なさる and おっしゃる, as well as ます and defective helpers such as ぬ・ず and う・よう, and also archaisms such as べし・べき; pretty much anything with some irregularity, whether true or perceived, that the learner cannot foresee and consequently tends to struggle to identify.

@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<s_inf>literary form of 〜た</s_inf>
+<s_inf>attributive form of き, auxiliary verb indicating directly experienced or factual past; roughly equivalent to modern 〜た</s_inf>

I think an xref is enough.

@@ -8,0 +9,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2178970">選ばれし者・えらばれしもの</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2654250">た・1</xref>
@@ -10 +12 @@
-<s_inf>literary form of -た-, e.g. 選ばれし者</s_inf>
+<s_inf>literary form of 〜た</s_inf>

format based on ざる

I've proposed a new entry.

New entry, I think. We have separate entries for そんな and んな.

そんな馬鹿な	73610	37.7%
そんなばかな	25035	12.8%
そんなバカな	78806	40.3%
んな馬鹿な	4230	2.2%
んなばかな	2251	1.2%
んなバカな	11397	5.8%

https://lineup.toei-anim.co.jp/ja/tv/dragonz/episode/22/
第 22 話 んなバカな！ 土から生まれたサイバイマン - ドラゴンボールZ

New entry? or sK and sks here?

(only sense 2 I think)

sense 1 use vs sense 2:
"そんなバカな" 9 vs 3
"そんな馬鹿な"  4 vs 2
I don't think we have coverage to say that sense 2 is more commonly そんなバカな - it is, yes, but then again so is 
sense 1.

@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<s_inf>usu. そんなバカな</s_inf>

Reopen.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&pol;</misc>

いかがお過ごしでしょうか	318615	89.0%
如何お過ごしでしょうか	39463	11.0%

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>如何お過ごしでしょうか</keb>

gg5

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<gloss>how are you getting along?</gloss>
+<gloss>how have you been?</gloss>
+<gloss>how are you?</gloss>

いかがお過ごしですか	202471  <- entry since 2010
いかがお過ごしでしょうか	318615
Several Tanaka sentences

V common. Better have it too. I'll index the sentences to it.

Aligning.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>何でかというと</keb>
+<keb>何でかと言うと</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>何でかと言うと</keb>
+<keb>何でかというと</keb>
@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>the reason is that ...</gloss>
@@ -23 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>the reason why is</gloss>

なんでかと言うと	3597	12.0%
何でかというと	7559	25.3%
何でかと言うと	3595	12.0%
なんでかというと	15156	50.7%

@@ -4,0 +5,7 @@
+<keb>何でかというと</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>何でかと言うと</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

なんでかと言うと	3597
なんでかというと	15156
なぜかというと	220108
なぜかと言うと	55815

A friend's 6-year-old says this all the time.

Plenty of usages of ねこ吸い on twitter.

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ねこ吸い</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

The first one does but I don't mind dropping it.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>cat-sniffing</gloss>
+<gloss>cat sniffing</gloss>

https://www.petfinder.com/cats/living-with-your-cat/what-is-cat-huffing/
https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=55044#more-55044

Hyphen? Those sources don't use it.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>cat huffing</gloss>

https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/chinas-youth-obsessed-with-cat-sniffing
https://daoinsights.com/news/chinas-feline-friendly-consumers-turn-to-cat-sniffing-and-cloud-cat-petting/

For now, at least, I think it's slang.
Western news sites translate the very similar Chinese term "吸猫" as "cat-sniffing".

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>cat-sniffing</gloss>

FWIW, I heard it from a Japanese person in casual conversation.

Trimming. No need to repeat the "arch".

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<s_inf>auxiliary verb indicating directly experienced or factual past; roughly equivalent to modern 〜た</s_inf>
+<s_inf>equiv. of modern 〜た</s_inf>

daijr, daijs, meikyo

Proposing this for completion's sake, since し has its own entry.

OK. Marginal at best.

おひぃさん	120	0.8%
お日さん	8291	52.5%
おひさん	5681	36.0%
お陽さん	1690	10.7%

I don't think this is needed. An argument for a standard spelling おひさん could be made, 4hough.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1270570">お日様</xref>
@@ -10 +11 @@
-<gloss>Sun</gloss>
+<gloss>the Sun</gloss>

http://static.kansaibenkyou.net/node/313

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ かっこ付け │ 1,094 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────╯

When I counted a couple months ago, we had 45 entries in which all the kanji forms were hidden. Not anything new at this point.

I think it would be better to drop the form altogether than to have it in an entry with the wrong readings. These inconsistencies can be annoying when doing things like checking the database for typos or generating furigana.

I deliberately left that behind as an [sK] in the 格好つける entry.

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>かっこ付ける</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Split from 1002880.

Duplicate

Split from 1002880.

Eijiro, Reverso

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -21,3 +21,3 @@
-<gloss>but why</gloss>
-<gloss>why in the world</gloss>
-<gloss>why the dickens</gloss>
+<gloss>but why?</gloss>
+<gloss>why in the world?</gloss>
+<gloss>why did you?</gloss>

なんで又	1121	1.0%
なんでまた	85723	77.1%
何でまた 	23534	21.2%
何で又   	755	0.7%

see also
なぜまた 	9290

https://ja.hinative.com/questions/7021198
https://ja.hinative.com/questions/13174818

Heard this on TV, my literal understanding of it didn't make sense to me in the context so I questioned the interviewer's word choice, my wife explained it was an idiomatic expression.

I think "but why" fits the best because my understanding is the Japanese expression isn't quite as emphatetic as the other 2 glosses.

Fork

I agree it doesn't really work as a standalone entry. I think it needs a か or や or sth similar at the end to take on this meaning.

GG5:
まあいいさ． Well, 「leave it as it is ［let it go at that］.
まあいいか．  Well, why not？
まあいい天気だこと． Isn't it lovely weather！ ｜ What a lovely day！
あっ, 塩を入れすぎたかな． まあいいか． Oh-oh, maybe that was too much salt． Oh well, I guess it's OK.
RP:
まあいいだろう. Fair enough!
まあいいや   Oh well!
KOD:
まあいいけどさ I don't know

The problem is that as まあ + いい it's very broad and the meaning usually/often depends on what comes after it.
I'm not sure it works as a standalone entry.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<gloss>oh well</gloss>

https://www.japanesewithanime.com/2019/03/maa-ii.html

meaningfully different from existing まあいいか, but both forms important:

まあいい	700866	  
まあいいか	219647	  
まあいいや	184158	  
まあいいん	37828	  
まあいいけど	29678	  
まあいいかと	20262	  
まあいいでしょ	17883	  
まあいいとして	17573	  
まあいいです	17522	  
まあいいでしょう	16195	  
まあいいかな	15417

https://hinative.com/questions/19286060  "What is the difference between まあいいや and まあいいか ?"
- I think they both have the same meaning.
- Almost same,...
- Both have the same meaning.

In a fork Marcus wrote: "I agree it doesn't really work as a standalone entry. I think it needs a か or や or sth similar at the end to take on this meaning."
I'm making this into まあいいや. I really don't see a good case for まあいい standing alone.
Aligning with まあいいか.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>まあいい</reb>
+<reb>まあいいや</reb>
@@ -9,5 +9,5 @@
-<gloss>whatever</gloss>
-<gloss>oh well</gloss>
-<gloss>fine</gloss>
-<gloss>never mind</gloss>
-<gloss>okay</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>oh well, fine</gloss>
+<gloss>fine, I guess</gloss>
+<gloss>alright, I suppose</gloss>
+<gloss>OK, then</gloss>

I think it is useful separately. I'm encountering it end-of-sentence, with clearly the 'whatever' meaning. in the reference it is also described separately. note that this article also mentions the meanings 'fine' and 'never mind'. from reverso it also seems it is commonly used by itself. and translated in some cases with 'okay' (adding these).

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<gloss>fine</gloss>
+<gloss>never mind</gloss>
+<gloss>okay</gloss>

GG5:
まあいいさ． Well, 「leave it as it is ［let it go at that］.
まあいいか．  Well, why not？
まあいい天気だこと． Isn't it lovely weather！ ｜ What a lovely day！
あっ, 塩を入れすぎたかな． まあいいか． Oh-oh, maybe that was too much salt． Oh well, I guess it's OK.
RP:
まあいいだろう. Fair enough!
まあいいや   Oh well!
KOD:
まあいいけどさ I don't know

The problem is that as まあ + いい it's very broad and the meaning usually/often depends on what comes after it.
I'm not sure it works as a standalone entry.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<gloss>oh well</gloss>

https://www.japanesewithanime.com/2019/03/maa-ii.html

meaningfully different from existing まあいいか, but both forms important:

まあいい	700866	  
まあいいか	219647	  
まあいいや	184158	  
まあいいん	37828	  
まあいいけど	29678	  
まあいいかと	20262	  
まあいいでしょ	17883	  
まあいいとして	17573	  
まあいいです	17522	  
まあいいでしょう	16195	  
まあいいかな	15417

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>にじゅうがらす</reb>
+<reb>にじゅうガラス</reb>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>double-paned glass</gloss>

https://context.reverso.net/翻訳/日本語-英語/二重ガラス

a lot more common than existing entry:

二重ガラス	6476
二重窓ガラス	174

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>observation room (hospital, prison, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>observation room (in a hospital, police station, etc.)</gloss>

RP, Eijiro, Igaku

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>observation room</gloss>
+<gloss>observation room (hospital, prison, etc.)</gloss>

https://context.reverso.net/翻訳/日本語-英語/観察室

観察室	7777