スパテル/スパーテル comes from German. Daijs has スパーテル as a synonym of 薬さじ. Interestingly, www images for スパテル match those for スパチュラ, not スパーテル.

@@ -6,8 +5,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>スパテル</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>スパーテル</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

スパチュラ	37502	94.9%
スパテル	1030	2.6%
スパーテル	968	2.5%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Ordered on hits.

@@ -4,3 +4,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>スパーテル</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -12,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スパーテル</reb>

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スパテル</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -13,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>spatula knife</gloss>
+<gloss>frosting spatula</gloss>

為すすべ	        6,381	
成すすべ	        5,103		
害を為す	        1,570		
害を成す	        1,573		
為すがまま	3,163		
成すがまま	3,746

I agree with the split but 成す is also used for the "do" sense.

@@ -43,0 +44,10 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>also written as 為す</s_inf>
+<gloss>to do</gloss>
+<gloss>to commit</gloss>
+<gloss>to carry out</gloss>
+<gloss>to bring about</gloss>

Reopen.

Split as suggested. I'll approve initially to lock it down and reopen.  If approved I'll fix the sentence indices.

@@ -10,8 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>為す</keb>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>爲す</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -20 +11,0 @@
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
@@ -26 +16,0 @@
-<stagk>成す</stagk>
@@ -36,11 +25,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<s_inf>esp. 為す</s_inf>
-<gloss>to do</gloss>
-<gloss>to commit</gloss>
-<gloss>to carry out</gloss>
-<gloss>to bring about</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagk>成す</stagk>
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -52 +30,0 @@
-<stagk>成す</stagk>
@@ -61 +38,0 @@
-<stagk>成す</stagk>
@@ -69 +45,0 @@
-<stagk>成す</stagk>

All the kokugos have 苅る for かる but I agree it should be hidden here.

I don't see the 苅 kanji form explicitly in any refs for this word. Nikkoku has it in a kanbun quote from 1471. Hiding.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 稲刈り　 │ 252,212 │ 96.5% │
│ 稲刈　　 │   7,197 │  2.8% │ - (daijr/s)
│ 稲苅り　 │      48 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ 稲苅　　 │      51 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ いねかり │   1,781 │  0.7% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -14 +14,4 @@
-<keb>稲苅り・稲苅</keb>
+<keb>稲苅り</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>稲苅</keb>

daijr, ngrams

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>稲苅り・稲苅</keb>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>up to what point</gloss>

@@ -18,2 +18 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1462020">二十四節気</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1446130">冬至</xref>

刈る	88,545	99.2%	
苅る	701	0.8%

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Minor reordering of glosses.

@@ -22,3 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>to cut (hair)</gloss>
-<gloss>to mow (grass)</gloss>
-<gloss>to harvest</gloss>
+<gloss>to cut (grass, hair, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to mow</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +25,2 @@
+<gloss>to trim</gloss>
+<gloss>to prune</gloss>
@@ -28,2 +29 @@
-<gloss>to trim</gloss>
-<gloss>to prune</gloss>
+<gloss>to harvest</gloss>

Probably best.

Thanks. My local copy of daijisen hasn't been updated with that sense.

If that's the case, we could merge with 2842540.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
@@ -19,0 +19,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>あさかい</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>early morning tea ceremony (on a summer day)</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/朝会_(あさかい)/
in daijs

None of my refs have あさかい with this meaning.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q11256035636

They call it あさかい at my company.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

I don't think the note is needed. It also refers to the iron content in minerals.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<s_inf>as a nutrient or in water</s_inf>

GG5

Clarify sense of iron *content* (nutrient etc.)

@@ -16,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>iron</gloss>
+<s_inf>as a nutrient or in water</s_inf>
+<gloss>iron (content)</gloss>

I don't think the 二十四節気 x-ref is needed/helpful.
The kokugos have x-refs between 冬至 and 夏至.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1462020">二十四節気</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1191460">夏至</xref>

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

I can't see it stated as such in legal lists.

Is sense 2 [law]?

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1790700">既決</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1790700">既決・2</xref>

@@ -27 +27,2 @@
-<xref type="ant">既決</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1790700">既決</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1790700">既決</xref>

daijs

@@ -22,0 +23,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="ant">既決</xref>
+<gloss>unconvicted</gloss>
+<gloss>awaiting judgement</gloss>
+</sense>

I don't think that etymological note in sense 1 helps much.

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<s_inf>derived from adjective 無し</s_inf>

Not quite true, many words have no traceable origin of any kind other than themselves; in Japanese this actually happens far more often than, for example, in english where most words have a traceable history in some combination of semantics, morphology, and phonetics. In contrast to this, every other 五段 verb, noun and particle shows little to no such alterations.
Now, here, the information the note provides is both a distinction and a connection in between sense 1 and 3: a reader looking at this entry, or even finding the variants separately, will surely make a connection between them as they look the same, sound the same, and the meanings are notably similar; the aim of the note is to clarify what that relation is rather than to simply leave the reader to their speculation.

In summary, since a shared etymology among the senses is already strongly suggested, the note is there to clarify what that etymology (if any) is to any reader who might be left wondering.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<s_inf>derived from old adjective 無し</s_inf>
+<s_inf>derived from adjective 無し</s_inf>

無し: derived from 無し

How is it helpful? All words have an etymology, that doesn't mean they all benefit from having notes on it.

I do not see how it would be confusing, it states that the nominal-class suffix spawns from the old adjective of proposed sense 3. Could you elaborate?

That note on sense 1 is not helpful, only confusing.

Yes, it's not a particle. I think "suf" is better - we're only using "adj-ku" for archaic 〜し terms.

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<pos>&adj-ku;</pos>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
@@ -29 +29 @@
-<s_inf>derived from imperative form of 無し；used after nouns or attributive form of verbs to make negative imperative</s_inf>
+<s_inf>from imperative form of 無し</s_inf>

daijr, daijs, meikyo

Added notes concerning word origin and usage. Changed [prt] to [adj-ku], though it could be argued that it only originated from the imperative of 無し and then became its own thing, classifying it as a particle seems odd. If my proposal for 無し is approved, consider adding a cross-reference to its third sense.

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<pos>&prt;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ku;</pos>
@@ -28,0 +29 @@
+<s_inf>derived from imperative form of 無し；used after nouns or attributive form of verbs to make negative imperative</s_inf>

see おどろくなかれ

@@ -17,0 +18,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>無かれ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

勿れ	22248	4.6%
莫れ	2790	0.6%
毋れ	296	0.1%
无れ	0	0.0% nikk but not daijs
なかれ	454416	94.7%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15 +17 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

〈絨／じゅう／ジュウ／ジュー〉〈毯／たん／タン／緞／氈〉爆撃

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 絨毯爆撃　　　 │ 16,528 │ 83.9% │
│ じゅうたん爆撃 │  2,622 │ 13.3% │ - add, sK
│ 絨緞爆撃　　　 │    337 │  1.7% │ - add, sK
│ ジュウタン爆撃 │    165 │  0.8% │
│ ジュータン爆撃 │     55 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>じゅうたん爆撃</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>絨緞爆撃</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I think Rene's suggestion in 2010 to move ichi1 to 絨毯 makes the most sense. 絨緞 doesn't need a freq tag.

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi2</ke_pri>
@@ -19,2 +18 @@
-<re_pri>ichi2</re_pri>
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>

Regarding Rene's objection in the comments below, this info is found in the JMdict XML file:
>> The entries marked "ichi2" were demoted from ichi1 because they were observed to have low frequencies in the WWW and newspapers.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 絨毯　　　 │ 565,970 │ 58.4% │
│ 絨緞　　　 │   7,009 │  0.7% │ - rK, demoting to ichi2
│ 絨氈　　　 │     753 │  0.1% │ - [iK] to [sK]
│ じゅうたん │ 348,340 │ 36.0% │
│ ジュータン │  28,699 │  3.0% │
│ ジュウタン │  17,752 │  1.8% │ - [nokanji] to [sk]
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10 +10,2 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_pri>ichi2</ke_pri>
@@ -14 +15 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18 +19 @@
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>ichi2</re_pri>
@@ -27 +28 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

OK with the POS change. I think just "aux" is enough.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
+<pos>&aux;</pos>
@@ -31 +31 @@
-<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
+<pos>&aux;</pos>

daijr, daijs

Changed [aux] to [aux-adj] and added [adj-ku] to reflect the item's inflection paradigm. If accepted entirely or partially, similar corrections should be done to べく and べき.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ku;</pos>
@@ -21 +22,2 @@
-<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ku;</pos>
@@ -29 +31,2 @@
-<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-adj;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ku;</pos>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5, chujiten, meikyo

@@ -11,2 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1011430">可き</xref>
+<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1011430">べき</xref>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
@@ -13,0 +15,18 @@
+<gloss>must</gloss>
+<gloss>should</gloss>
+<gloss>ought to</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>will (surely)</gloss>
+<gloss>be bound to</gloss>
+<gloss>must</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>indicates volition</s_inf>
+<gloss>will (do)</gloss>
@@ -15,2 +33,0 @@
-<gloss>should</gloss>
-<gloss>must</gloss>

Household term.

JA wiki doesn't mention コッカトリース. Dropping.
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/コカトリス

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────╮
│ コカトリス　　 │ 14,587 │
│ コッカトリース │      0 │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────╯

Kyoto/Melbourne N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬─────╮
│ コカトリス　　 │ 711 │
│ コッカトリース │   0 │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴─────╯

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>コッカトリース</reb>

隠し芸	18055	93.2%
裏芸	1321	6.8%

Aligning with 隠し芸 - most JEs simply xref to it.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>act or trick which a performer reserves for selected occasions</gloss>
+<gloss>one's party piece</gloss>
+<gloss>parlor trick</gloss>
+<gloss>hidden talent</gloss>

gg5 has "party trick" etc.

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, daijs

@@ -9,0 +10,14 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>(the) cloud</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2715950">クラウドコンピューティング</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2815540">クラウドサービス</xref>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>cloud computing</gloss>
+<gloss>cloud service</gloss>

Splitting on source word.

@@ -11,4 +10,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>crowd</gloss>
-</sense>

Thanks.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>Rus' (old name of Russia)</gloss>
+<gloss>Rus' (old name for Russia)</gloss>

Aha, daijisen also has ルーシ.
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/ルーシ/

Jawiki has ルーシ族 for "Rus' people." 
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ルーシ族

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────╮
│ ルシ族　 │   0 │
│ ルーシ族 │ 211 │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────╯

This article has ルーシ as a transliteration of Роусь（Rus'）
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/キエフ大公国

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>ルシ</reb>
+<reb>ルーシ</reb>

Is there a source for this?

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Noted.

Counterargument: The etymology/morphology, while not strictly necessary, serves as supplementary information that tells the reader not only what something is or does (a task of the definition and/or translation) but how also it comes to do so. Without it, ば seems to come out of nowhere, and though the cross-reference to は is likely sufficient for one to deduce what is happening, they would still need to look elsewhere for confirmation whereas we could simply leave 1 extra line of text here and save them of the task, especially if the reader is not yet particularly proficient and struggles to find a source.

Should these reasons still be insufficient, I rest my case.

Neither do I.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<s_inf>phonetic change of topic particle ～は added to object particle ～を; from ～をは</s_inf>

I don't think the etym note is helpful.

daijs, daijr

Added notes concerning word origin.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2028920">は・3</xref>
@@ -10,0 +12 @@
+<s_inf>phonetic change of topic particle ～は added to object particle ～を; from ～をは</s_inf>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

食道癌	73811
食道がん	48318
食道ガン	9538

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>食道ガン</keb>

Entry created

https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#References - "... more substantial changes must be accompanied by references and/or a case for the change in the Comments field."

An edit like this needs a good case to be made, including showing that the term is used in English. Whoever you are, please follow our guidelines.
I'm putting it back to the previous version.

@@ -14,3 +14,3 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">""</lsource>
-<gloss>Boy's Love</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">comics or novels about male homosexuality, targeted at young women</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">boys love</lsource>
+<gloss>comics or novels about male homosexuality, targeted at young women</gloss>

@@ -14,3 +14,3 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">boys love</lsource>
-<gloss>comics or novels about male homosexuality, targeted at young women</gloss>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">""</lsource>
+<gloss>Boy's Love</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">comics or novels about male homosexuality, targeted at young women</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>comics or novels about male homosexuality, targetted at young women</gloss>
+<gloss>comics or novels about male homosexuality, targeted at young women</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボーイズ・ラブ</reb>

Entry created

プチッ	114,229	96.9%	
プチっ	3,680	3.1%
sense 2:
https://minamino-kaze.site/mustar-ne/
マスタードの粒をつぶさず使用し、プチッとした食感が特徴のマスタードです
sense 3:
https://www.kusurinomadoguchi.com/column/articles/month-thing
口の中にプチッとした水ぶくれのような透明な赤いものができたことありませんか？

Aligning.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -12 +13,7 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2192340">ポチっ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2192340">ポチッ・1</xref>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>with a click (of a button or switch)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -15 +22,9 @@
-<gloss>with a click (beep)</gloss>
+<gloss>crisply</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2192340">ポチッ・2</xref>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>one (small protrusion, hole, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>single</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

Entry created

daijr: 丁寧の助動詞で，聞き手に対する丁寧な気持ちを表す。

I think "politeness" is better than "respect".

@@ -10 +10,2 @@
-<gloss>used to indicate respect for the listener (or reader)</gloss>
+<s_inf>attaches to the -masu stem of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>expresses politeness towards the listener (or reader)</gloss>
@@ -16 +17 @@
-<gloss>used to indicate respect for those affected by the action</gloss>
+<gloss>expresses respect towards those affected by the action</gloss>

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2210310">ませ</xref>

Entry created

Thanks for the comments.
We could have extended discussions on where and how to represent morphology and etymology, but these comments are NOT the appropriate forum. Please feel free to raise an issue in the Github forum if you wish. 
https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Issues_Forum

This is strictly morphology that the reader can apply to their use of the language, for example: knowing it is made from ん and what ん derives from allows them to correctly predict the existence of ませぬ - or - if someone learns of ぬ through ません and learns from ぬ's entry its function/meaning and how it is morphologically added to other words, then they would be equipped to locate and understand every single instance of ぬ or ん they find from thereon, as well as to use it themselves. Is this not a benefit for the reader?
This is in line with the editorial policy that lists "where there is a derivational relationship between words that it is useful to highlight, e.g. between かっけー and 格好いい, or between オケる and 空オケ." as a cross-reference that can enhance the value of the entry; this is fundamentally the same as the given examples - and with ぬ being a productive morpheme, morphology notes and references would be even more useful.
Now, I do agree that it is not all etymology and/or morphology that should be added: here there is a positive impact for the learner's understanding and practice. Contrast this with something such as adding "changed over time from まゐらす to まらする, まする, culminating in ます" to the ます entry. The latter would be a truly useless historical etymology that does not help readers to understand what something means, how it comes to mean it, nor how to use it.


I understand that the dictionary is not here to teach morphology, but it is here to teach Japanese and morphology just cannot not be useful in such a highly agglutinative language - in fact, it is not only useful, it is required for its use: it is the necessity of morphology that led you to add "after the -masu stem of a verb" to this very entry, it is morphology that dictates we have separate verb classes and it is morphology that distinguishes verbs from adjectives and tells you how to use each. 
If we are ignoring any mention of etymological and/or morphological information and concern ourselves only with self-contained semantic/functional minimalism, we might as well remove: the left half of the note in this entry along with all 3 cross-references, the cross-reference to 格好いい in かっけー, as well as any other similarly substantiated note or reference in any and all entries. We could even remove the tags for 動詞 and 形容詞 and neatly bundle them under a category for 述語 since that is the all-encompassing superset. Nonetheless, I think you will agree that would make the dictionary less useful as it would lose much of its power to teach usage - which directly affects ability to teach identification and thus, comprehension - and completely lose any information about derivative connections, all because of morphology and etymology.

Do you believe that usage, identification, and relations are not something that a cross-linguistic dictionary should seek to teach? Is it not what the reader seeks to learn? If you do think so, then what does it seek to teach? Raw semantic correspondence? If you give yourself the bother to think about these questions, consider: Every time someone conjugates something, they are engaging with morphology. Every time you add an [adj] tag to something, you are teaching them about it.

Since we're not attempting to explain the etymology.

How would the cross-reference to ん be redundant? As it is, there is no way for one to know that the ん in ません is the negative ぬ・ん from simply looking at this entry.

I agree with Robin on the etymology, etc. The xref to ん is quite redundant.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2139720">ん・3</xref>

Sankoku has this as a 造語成分.
Not a computing term.

@@ -9,2 +9,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1051040">コミュニティー</xref>
-<field>&comp;</field>
+<xref type="see" seq="1050980">コミュニケーション</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2840262">コミュ力</xref>
@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>community</gloss>
+<s_inf>used in compounds</s_inf>
+<gloss>communication</gloss>
@@ -16 +17 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2840262">コミュ力</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1051040">コミュニティー</xref>
@@ -18 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>communication</gloss>
+<s_inf>used in compounds</s_inf>
+<gloss>community</gloss>

http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/���ߥ� - suggests コミュニカティブなえいご
ＫＯＤ追加語彙 has a コミュ力 entry.

PLEASE provide references when proposing a change!

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1050980">コミュニケーション</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2840262">コミュ力</xref>

@@ -13,0 +14,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1050980">コミュニケーション</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>communication</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

I wouldn't object to it.

It would have to be a separate entry. But I'm not sure it's needed given that we have a "mechanical pencil" sense for シャープ.

シャー芯	6339	71.7%
シャープ芯	2117	23.9%
シャーペン芯	387	4.4%

worth including シャープ芯 here? note needs to be changed if we're not making it sk

https://www.weblio.jp/content/シャー芯

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>from シャーペン + 芯</s_inf>

シャー芯	6339

I feel there should be a note saying it's from "sharp lead".

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1755120">山の手・2</xref>
@@ -13,2 +14 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1755120">山の手・2</xref>
-<gloss>the refined speech of the uptown residents of Tokyo</gloss>
+<gloss>refined speech of the uptown residents of Tokyo</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1755120">山の手・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1755120">山の手・2</xref>

@@ -15,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>the refined speech of the uptown residents Tokyo</gloss>
+<gloss>the refined speech of the uptown residents of Tokyo</gloss>

pretty sure the xref is pointing at the wrong thing

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1185940">下町</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1718880">下町言葉</xref>

〈寝／ね〉る〈子／こ／コ〉は〈育／そだ〉つ

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 寝る子は育つ　 │ 55,646 │ 97.3% │
│ 寝るコは育つ　 │    399 │  0.7% │
│ 寝る子はそだつ │    295 │  0.5% │ - add, sK
│ ねる子はそだつ │    200 │  0.3% │ - add, sK
│ ねる子は育つ　 │    169 │  0.3% │ - add, sK
│ 寝るこは育つ　 │    124 │  0.2% │ - add, sK
│ ねるこは育つ　 │     34 │  0.1% │
│ ねるこはそだつ │    311 │  0.5% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,16 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>寝る子はそだつ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ねる子はそだつ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ねる子は育つ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>寝るこは育つ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Add POS to proverbs
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&v5t;</pos>

It's my own invention, but rather witty, isn't it?

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<misc>&id;</misc>
-<gloss>Sleep brings up a child well</gloss>
+<misc>&proverb;</misc>
+<gloss>sleep brings up a child well</gloss>
+<gloss>a well-slept child is a well-kept child</gloss>

Entry created

I agree.

I don't think we need etymological info for an archaic term. Shinmeikai doesn't mention it. I also don't think it's helpful to describe it as a "supplementary form". It's not clear what it means.
I don't object to splitting out sense 2 into a separate entry.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -10,2 +9,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2829645">ず</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2150170">あり・3</xref>
@@ -13 +11 @@
-<s_inf>supplementary form of 〜ず, from 〜ずあり; used after a -nai stem</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after a -nai stem</s_inf>

daijr, daijs, meikyo

Proposals: Slightly more detailed explanation concerning morphology/etymology. Cross-references to the morphemes that make up said morphology/etymology. Addition of tag [vr]; being made from あり has the consequence of ざり's conjugation table being of the ラ変 pattern.
Removal of [2] and subsequent relocation into its own entry as the two ざり bear no direct connection to each other; however, as this last suggestion is not consistent with other entries that will often group distinct homographs under one item - such as the entry for the auxiliary ない - I will not object to its rejection.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+<pos>&vr;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2829645">ず</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2150170">あり・3</xref>
@@ -10 +13 @@
-<s_inf>from 〜ずあり; used after a -nai stem</s_inf>
+<s_inf>supplementary form of 〜ず, from 〜ずあり; used after a -nai stem</s_inf>
@@ -12,6 +14,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<s_inf>from 〜ぞあり; usu. as 〜にざりける</s_inf>
-<gloss>is</gloss>
-<gloss>are</gloss>

@@ -10,2 +10,2 @@
-<s_inf>from 〜ずあり</s_inf>
-<gloss>(used after a -nai stem) not ...</gloss>
+<s_inf>from 〜ずあり; used after a -nai stem</s_inf>
+<gloss>not</gloss>

No case was made for the change. I prefer the previous version.

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>Boy's Love</gloss>
+<s_inf>from the 和製英語 boys love</s_inf>
+<gloss>male homosexuality</gloss>

@@ -18,2 +18,2 @@
-<s_inf>from the 和製英語 boys love</s_inf>
-<gloss>male homosexuality</gloss>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>Boy's Love</gloss>

Reformat initialsms
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>ビー・エル</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -20,0 +20,1 @@
+<gloss>BL</gloss>

@@ -12,1 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>male homosexuality (from the wasei "boys love")</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2162260">ボーイズラブ</xref>
+<s_inf>from the 和製英語 boys love</s_inf>
+<gloss>male homosexuality</gloss>

@@ -8,2 +8,3 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<gloss>thank you (dialect from the Izumo region of Shimane Prefecture)</gloss>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<s_inf>Izumo dialect</s_inf>
+<gloss>thank you</gloss>

I think this problem is now fixed. The text glossing is producing a more appropriate gloss.

The 段々 entry has just had a "uk" (usually kana) tag put on it. In tomorrow's update it should become part of the だんだん that is matched in the Text Glossing function. I'll leave this open to remind me to check it works OK.

This is coming up as the default reading in text glossing when 
the hiragana for DANDAN is used instead of kanji. Native 
speakers will write this as hiragana and text glossing 
translations will suffer. This is a local dialect word.

gg5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&surg;</field>

gg5, eij, ls

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 腐るほど　 │ 108,916 │ 86.5% │
│ 腐る程　　 │  10,033 │  8.0% │
│ くさる程　 │     423 │  0.3% │ - add, sK
│ くさるほど │   6,612 │  5.2% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>くさる程</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

maybe exp, n-adv.  hard to come up with pos-appropriate english glosses

@@ -14,1 +14,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n-adv;</pos>

daijr daijs
Google:
"腐るほど" 2,410,000
"腐る程" 347,000

Not sure on part-of-speech (and thus how the glosses should be written).

Sankoku added a third sense in its 8th edition:
  ③〔稲刈りの前に〕田んぼの水をぬくこと。

@@ -19,0 +20,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>draining (of a rice paddy before harvest)</gloss>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

GG5

OK

Seems like that part shouldn't be bracketed

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Beijing dialect of Standard Chinese (as spoken during the Qing dynasty)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Beijing dialect of Standard Chinese as spoken during the Qing dynasty</gloss>

gg5, daij, koj
百科事典マイペディア: "中国では清末まで公用語を官話と呼び，華北から東北に通用したものを北京官話といった。現代の標準語は北京官話を基礎とする。"

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────╮
│ ヤマを踏む │ 82 │ - add
│ 山を踏む　 │ 70 │
├─ーーーーー─┼────┤
│ ヤマを踏ん │ 95 │
│ 山を踏ん　 │ 90 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────╯

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ヤマを踏む</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1302680">ヤマ・7</xref>

daijr nikk

smk has 攙入 in the headword line and 竄入 in a note at the end (「竄入」と書くこともある。).

The n-gram counts are so low for both forms that I think it would be better to drop the [rK] tag.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

meikyo, gg5

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>
@@ -19 +20 @@
-<gloss>running (into)</gloss>
+<gloss>running into</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +26 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>
@@ -25,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>being included by mistake</gloss>

koj daij meikyo gg5 
攙入  only in mk, prob rK? (ngrams down)

I guess it's OK.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOd8J0FXNnU

Maybe [iK], but seen like this in some YouTube results.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>神引</keb>

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q13236429678
https://ja.hinative.com/questions/16296565

KOD: 	【植】 〔ウコギ科の高木〕 an ivy tree; Schefflera octophylla.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki daijs sekaidaihyakkajiten
common name from EOL


鱶の木	0	0.0%
フカノキ	358	91.6%
ふかのき	33	8.4%

normally I wouldn't make the kanji rK when the word itself isn't all that common but the word doesn't seem obscure to me looking at Google

https://magazine.cainz.com/article/18783
ホンコンカポック（シェフレラ）の育て方とは？

sekaidaihyakkajiten フカノキ
小葉が幅広く丸みのある変種は観賞価値が高く，ホンコンカポックcv.Hong Kongの名で普及している。しかし，キワタ科のカポックとは関係のない植物である。

ホンコンカポック	3555	36.1%
香港カポック	856	8.7%
シェフレラ	5450	55.3%
シェフレーラ	0	0.0%

Fork

A bit literal but maybe it works.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>now deceased</gloss>

今は無き	65611	21.2%
今は亡き	184268	59.6%
今はなき	59411	19.2%

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q10232535310

Maybe better

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -15 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>no longer alive</gloss>
+<gloss>departed</gloss>
+<gloss>deceased</gloss>

今は無き	65611	21.2%
今は亡き	184268	59.6%
今はなき	59411	19.2%

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q10232535310

今は無き	65611	21.2%
今は亡き	184268	59.6%
今はなき	59411	19.2%

https://www.okeihan.net/navi/kyoto_tsu/tsu202009.php
今は無き風景

gg5, saito
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mud_pie

〈泥／どろ／ドロ〉〈饅／まん／マン〉〈頭／じゅう／ジュウ／ジュー〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬─────╮
│ 泥饅頭　　　　 │ 262 │
│ 泥まんじゅう　 │ 268 │
│ どろまんじゅう │  74 │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴─────╯

I've never heard of a dirt pie.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>泥まんじゅう</keb>
@@ -12 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>dirt pie</gloss>

A bit A+B, but common.

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/問い合わせ窓口

問い合わせ窓口  	1001615	51.5%
お問い合わせ窓口	867089	44.6%
問い合せ窓口    	62156	3.2%
問合わせ窓口    	11487	0.6%
問合窓口        	1916	0.1%

OK

I don't think this should be an entry, either. It's no different from 食べまへん except it's more common in the ngrams. あらへん and かまへん are different and worth keeping because you couldn't arrive at あらへん from ない, and かまへん is irregular (if it were regular, it'd be かまわへん)

有りまへん	400	1.0%
在りまへん	0	0.0%
ありまへん	38068	99.0%

No need for such xrefs.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,2 +16,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1296400">ある・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2222860">まへん</xref>

If it is to be, then let us do it all the way.
Still, I will make one final argument against it: compounds from which the meaning is easily deductible by the constituent morphemes and in which those morphemes themselves are discernable by the morphology of the word (no contractions, etc.) do not require their own entry and have little reason to be given one; under these circumstances, it would be the same as adding a dedicated entry for every verb with ない or ぬ or any other helper attached to them. Would that do any harm? No, but it is fundamentally superfluous.

In any case, should this be accepted, I will be conducting identical changes to あらへん and others of the previously given list as they too are missing the kanji and cross-references.

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>有りまへん</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>在りまへん</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +15,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1296400">ある・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2222860">まへん</xref>

ありまへん	38068
あらへん	97232
構へん	1224
かまへん	18392

I'm comfortable with it. Aligning with あらへん.

@@ -8,2 +8 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&joc;</misc>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -11,2 +10,3 @@
-<gloss>to not exist</gloss>
-<gloss>to not be</gloss>
+<gloss>not</gloss>
+<gloss>nonexistent</gloss>
+<gloss>not being (there)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ リトルプレス　 │ 7,913 │
│ リトル・プレス │   138 │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴───────╯

Maybe this works.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>リトル・プレス</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>small circulated publications produced by individuals or organizations</gloss>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">little press</lsource>
+<gloss>small-circulation self-published work</gloss>

http://www.otegarushuppan.com/lp/littlepress/

「リトルプレス」とは、個人や団体が自らの手で制作した少部数発行の出版物を指します。

Searching for that quote on google shows that it's actually あまねく.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────╮
│ あまねく │ 64,294 │
│ あまぬく │      0 │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────╯

旧約聖書マンガ book 1: 
ヨセフの威光は全土にあまぬく及んだ。

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

G n-grams:

仮決めし　 1,202 94.6%
仮決めをし    69  5.4%

Wadoku has -きめ, but the few Youglish samples I listened to were all -ぎめ.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

仮決め	2540
GT

Possibly read かりきめ.

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

金箆	53	100.0%
金篦	0	0.0%
かなべら	0	0.0%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1071890">スパチュラ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1071890">スパチュラ</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; 三省堂　スーパー大辞林; 広辞苑 第六版

GG5 often has out-dated names.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoon-billed_sandpiper
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ヘラシギ

https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22693452/134202771
>> Spoon-billed Sandpiper (Calidris pygmaea)

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────╮
│ 箆鷸　　 │   0 │
│ 篦鷸　　 │   0 │
│ へらしぎ │   0 │
│ ヘラシギ │ 863 │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────╯

"Eurynorhynchus pygmeus" is an older name according to wikipedia.

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<reb>ヘラシギ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -12 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>spoon-billed sandpiper (Eurynorhynchus pygmeus)</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>spoon-billed sandpiper (Calidris pygmaea)</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

OK, indexed.

Reverso, GG5 examples, Tanaka sentences

More than one meaning. There are 7 sentences - I'll approve this so they can be indexed, then reopen.

@@ -13,0 +14,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>such a place</gloss>
+<gloss>that sort of place</gloss>
+</sense>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=そんなところ
https://thesaurus.weblio.jp/content/まあそんなところだ
https://nativecamp.net/heync/question/19331

そんなところ	616229	79.1%
そんな所	158732	20.4%
そんな処	3653	0.5%
These kanji forms may be false positives, but I thought I'd include their ngrams for reference.

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, daijs, jawiki
コーングリッツ	7,728

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>bombing squadron</gloss>
+<gloss>air strike force</gloss>
+<gloss>bomber squadron</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

七夕馬	509

Curious custom.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>straw horse for the Tanabata</gloss>
+<gloss>Tanabata straw horse</gloss>

広辞苑 第六版

daijs
スパチュール	81		
スパチュラ	37,502

gg5, daijs, www images
薬さじ	2,106	78.8%	
薬匙	567	21.2%

gg5 has 麦わら帽（子）.
麦わら帽 is in shinsen.

〈麦／むぎ／ムギ〉〈藁／稈／わら／ワラ〉〈帽／ぼう／ボウ／ボー〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 麦わら帽　　　 │   5,516 │ 49.8% │ - add
│ 麦藁帽　　　　 │   4,338 │ 39.1% │ - add
│ むぎわら帽　　 │     415 │  3.7% │ - add, sK
│ 麦わらぼう　　 │     122 │  1.1% │ - add, sK
│ 麦稈帽　　　　 │     108 │  1.0% │ - rK
│ 麦ワラ帽　　　 │      98 │  0.9% │
│ ムギワラ帽　　 │      83 │  0.7% │
│ 麦わらボウ　　 │      75 │  0.7% │
│ むぎわらぼう　 │     326 │  2.9% │
├─ーーーーーーー─┼─────────┼───────┤
│ 麦わら帽子　　 │ 111,242 │  ---  │
│ 麦藁帽子　　　 │  33,661 │  ---  │
│ むぎわら帽子　 │   5,491 │  ---  │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -4,0 +5,6 @@
+<keb>麦わら帽</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>麦藁帽</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +12,9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>むぎわら帽</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>麦わらぼう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +27 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1604820">麦わら帽子</xref>

精選版　日本国語大辞典; https://www.weblio.jp/content/麦稈帽; google images

Split from 1071890.

daijs, www images

Split from 1071890.

Split from 2428160.

Fork

I thought we put the given name first for anyone born after the Meiji era.

Wait, do we? I've been operating under the assumption the preferred order was the opposite one, for ages. I've flipped the order on 10s if not 100s of entries throughout the years.

For Japanese names we put the family name first. Please make a case for such a change.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Ichirō Suzuki (1973.10.22-; baseball player)</gloss>
+<gloss>Suzuki Ichirō (1973.10.22-; baseball player)</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Suzuki Ichirō (1973.10.22-; baseball player)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ichirō Suzuki (1973.10.22-; baseball player)</gloss>

OK, putting it back, but we probably should document this properly somewhere. 
(https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/30)

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Suzuki Ichirō (1973.10.22-; baseball player)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ichirō Suzuki (1973.10.22-; baseball player)</gloss>

From a fork:
>> A* 2024-04-19 15:01:21  Robin Scott
>> I thought we put the given name first for anyone born after the Meiji era.

jmnedict 5358841
>> A* 2024-02-13 09:16:07  Marcus Richert
>> And we still do Western name order for people alive during and after Meiji, don't we?

I've been flipping orders as well.

Wait, do we? I've been operating under the assumption the preferred order was the opposite one, for ages. I've flipped the order on 10s if not 100s of entries throughout the years.

For Japanese names we put the family name first. Please make a case for such a change.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Ichirō Suzuki (1973.10.22-; baseball player)</gloss>
+<gloss>Suzuki Ichirō (1973.10.22-; baseball player)</gloss>

Adding some forms from JMdict.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ スウェーデン │ 1,600,249 │ 96.5% │
│ スエーデン　 │    33,892 │  2.0% │
│ スェーデン　 │    16,136 │  1.0% │ - add
│ スウエーデン │     6,986 │  0.4% │ - add
│ スウェデン　 │       327 │  0.0% │ - add (from deleted entry 5042943)
╰─ーーーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,9 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スェーデン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スウエーデン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スウェデン</reb>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スエーデン</reb>

Merge with 5042925

wiki daijs etc.
ベッテルン湖	0	0.0%
ヴェッテルン湖	317	100.0%

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ヴェッテルン湖</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -7,0 +11,4 @@
+<reb>ヴェッテルンこ</reb>
+<re_restr>ヴェッテルン湖</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +16 @@
+<re_restr>ベッテルン湖</re_restr>
@@ -12,2 +20 @@
-<gloss>Vattern</gloss>
-<gloss>Vattern Lake</gloss>
+<gloss>Lake Vättern (Sweden)</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/リャザニ-669905

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>リャザニ</reb>

wiki

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&place;</misc>

Wikipedia and マイペディア have it as にほん rather than にっぽん.
https://kotobank.jp/word/日本国内航空[株]-858599

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>にっぽんこくないこうくう</reb>
+<reb>にほんこくないこうくう</reb>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Agreed. It's more useful for text glossing as the company name will not always appear with the 株式会社 suffix.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>日本国内航空株式会社</keb>
+<keb>日本国内航空</keb>
@@ -8,2 +8 @@
-<reb>にっぽんこくないこうくうかぶしきがいしゃ</reb>
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
+<reb>にっぽんこくないこうくう</reb>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Domestic_Airlines
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/日本国内航空

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ 日本国内航空株式会社 │    39 │
│ 日本国内航空　　　　 │ 1,420 │
╰─ーーーーーーーーーー─┴───────╯

We could drop the 株式会社 part.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Japan Domestic Airlines</gloss>
+<gloss>Japan Domestic Airlines (1964-1971)</gloss>

wiki

wiki

wiki

Wikipedia has "My Pedia," but it seems like it's always romanized as "Mypaedia" on the covers of the physical copies printed by Heibonsha.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/マイペディア
>> マイペディア (My Pedia) は平凡社が刊行した百科事典である。

https://static.mercdn.net/item/detail/orig/photos/m51230741865_4.jpg?1700098148
https://www.heibonsha.co.jp/book/b157274.html
https://www.heibonsha.co.jp/book/b157273.html

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────╮
│ マイペディア │ 10,782 │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────╯