https://ranking.goo.ne.jp/select/9378#14882568

Someone added "cold cereal" and "breakfast cereal" in 2007 along with this comment (but no references): "In popular usage, this words refers to any kind of breakfast cereal, and not just flake-shaped ones made of corn."
I don't think this is true. It certainly isn't used for muesli/granola.
The above link includes ココくんのチョコワ (which are like chocolate Cheerios) in a "top 5 cornflake cereals" list but I'm struggling to find other examples of コーンフレーク referring to non-flaked cereals. Google image results for コーンフレーク are what you'd expect.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>(breakfast) cereal</gloss>

Corn flakes are a type of breakfast cereal, yes, but I'm not seeing this in the refs as meaning "breakfast cereal" in general?

コーンフレーク	83,390		
コーンフレークス	1,455

I think コーンフレークス should be a separate entry. It's not a spelling variant.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>コーンフレークス</reb>
@@ -16,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>cold cereal</gloss>
-<gloss>breakfast cereal</gloss>
+<gloss>cornflakes</gloss>
+<gloss>(breakfast) cereal</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -10 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

ゴールドのリング	6820	100.0%
ゴールドなリング	0	0.0%

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

daijs

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>it fits perfectly</gloss>
+<gloss>perfect fit</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジャスト・フィット</reb>

All the kokugos have 苅る for かる but I agree it should be hidden here.

I don't see the 苅 kanji form explicitly in any refs for this word. Nikkoku has it in a kanbun quote from 1471. Hiding.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 稲刈り　 │ 252,212 │ 96.5% │
│ 稲刈　　 │   7,197 │  2.8% │ - (daijr/s)
│ 稲苅り　 │      48 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ 稲苅　　 │      51 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ いねかり │   1,781 │  0.7% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -14 +14,4 @@
-<keb>稲苅り・稲苅</keb>
+<keb>稲苅り</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>稲苅</keb>

daijr, ngrams

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>稲苅り・稲苅</keb>

Smaller kokugos other than meikyo all have this tagged [vt]

daijr example 「運河を―する」

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

merge

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>開鑿</keb>

I assume this one on かっこ can go too

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<re_pri>nf22</re_pri>

Removing freq tags from rK form.

@@ -12,2 +11,0 @@
-<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf22</ke_pri>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 確固　　 │  79,734 │ 96.1% │
│ 確乎　　 │   3,262 │  3.9% │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s,  koj, etc.)
├─ーーーー─┼─────────┼───────┤
│ 確固たる │ 283,248 │ 99.5% │
│ 確乎たる │   1,544 │  0.5% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>school child</gloss>
+<gloss>schoolchild</gloss>

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>care of schoolchildren outside of school time</gloss>
+<gloss>after-school childcare</gloss>

GG5 (has this as a 2nd sense)

first result on google

@@ -18,0 +19,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1761290">学童保育</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>care of schoolchildren outside of school time</gloss>
+</sense>

Smaller kokugos all have this tagged [vi].

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, daijr

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<gloss>head (of cabbage, lettuce, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>head (of cabbage, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>forming a head</gloss>
+<gloss>coming to a head</gloss>

daij, prog, eij

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>rounding</gloss>
+<gloss>head (of cabbage, etc.)</gloss>

Meikyo, smk, sankoku, iwakoku have みなしご marked as jukujikun.

I don't see みなし子 in my refs. Tagging it as irregular.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>

daij, gg5

Added sense.

@@ -28,0 +29,5 @@
+<sense>
+<stagr>こじ</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>person without friends</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -31 +31 @@
-<gloss>query (e.g. database)</gloss>
+<gloss>query (of a database)</gloss>

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<gloss>query (e.g. a database)</gloss>
+<gloss>query (e.g. database)</gloss>

https://www.ibm.com/docs/ja/db2/11.5?topic=sql-queries
https://gxpretool-docs.gxp.jp/docs/querying-via-sql

@@ -23,0 +24,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2293370">クエリ</xref>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>query (e.g. a database)</gloss>

GG5: (an) inquiry; (an) enquiry; (a) reference; (a) referral.  ～する inquire 《of sb about sth》; make inquiries 《as to…》; refer [make a reference] to 《sb for sth》; apply [write] 《to sb for information》.
中辞典: (an) inquiry; 〈医者･裁判所などへの〉 (a) referral
ルミナス: (尋ねる･問い合わせる) inquire for…; (質問事項などについて知識を得るために問い合わせる) refer to… (for…)
OED - referral - "an act of referring someone or something for consultation, review, or further action"

I see your issue with them. It's possibly a bit uncommon in AmE. Maybe just referral with some context.

@@ -23,2 +23 @@
-<gloss>reference</gloss>
-<gloss>referral</gloss>
+<gloss>referral (e.g. to a doctor or court)</gloss>

hiragana longer

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>long sword (as opposed to the shorter katakana)</gloss>
+<gloss>long sword (as opposed to the shorter katana)</gloss>

daij, meikyo

I think だいとう should be a separate entry.
See Marcus's comment below regarding 横刀.
I don't think the "straight single-edged Japanese sword" sense is needed. It's really a note on kanji usage. We could add a note to sense 1 but I'm not sure it's necessary. 世界大百科 notes: "主として直刀に属するものを〈大刀〉と書き，平安時代以降の外反り（そとぞり）刀を〈太刀〉の文字であらわすのが習慣であるが，考古学用語としては，古墳時代の内反りの素環頭大刀も，便宜上〈大刀〉と書いている。"

@@ -12,3 +11,0 @@
-<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf33</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>spec2</ke_pri>
@@ -18 +15 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -26,7 +22,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>だいとう</reb>
-<re_restr>大刀</re_restr>
-<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf33</re_pri>
-<re_pri>spec2</re_pri>
-</r_ele>
@@ -35,2 +25 @@
-<gloss>long sword (esp. the tachi, worn on the hip edge down by samurai)</gloss>
-<gloss>large sword</gloss>
+<gloss>long sword (as opposed to the shorter katakana)</gloss>
@@ -39,2 +28 @@
-<stagk>大刀</stagk>
-<stagr>たち</stagr>
+<stagk>太刀</stagk>
@@ -43,8 +31,2 @@
-<gloss>straight single-edged Japanese sword (from the mid-Heian period or earlier)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagk>大刀</stagk>
-<stagr>だいとう</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>guandao</gloss>
-<gloss>Chinese glaive</gloss>
+<gloss>tachi</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">sabre-like sword worn on the hip with the blade facing down</gloss>

太刀	292419	87.4%
大刀	41578	12.4%
横刀	443	0.1% -> sK

Not sure 横刀 belongs here. I'm seeing refs to it as おうとう. Anyway, 横 is not related to 太/大.
Also, I see the JEs split 太刀/たち and 大刀/だいとう.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -29 +28,0 @@
-<re_restr>横刀</re_restr>

M-W: "compare apples and/to/with oranges; idiom: to compare things that are very different"

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>comparing apples to oranges</gloss>

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/compare apples and/to/with oranges#:~:text=: to compare things that are,to compare apples with oranges.

comparing apples to oranges would be a perfect translation. Thanks.

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>comparing apples to oranges</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ どんぐりの背比べ　　 │ 21,011 │ 64.5% │
│ ドングリの背比べ　　 │  7,131 │ 21.9% │
│ どんぐりの背くらべ　 │  1,834 │  5.6% │ - sK
│ 団栗の背比べ　　　　 │  1,312 │  4.0% │ - (daijr/s, meikyo)
│ どんぐりのせいくらべ │  1,171 │  3.6% │
│ ドングリのせいくらべ │     94 │  0.3% │ - dropping restrictions
╰─ーーーーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>どんぐりの背くらべ</keb>
+<keb>団栗の背比べ</keb>
@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<keb>団栗の背比べ</keb>
+<keb>どんぐりの背くらべ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,6 +18,0 @@
-<re_restr>どんぐりの背比べ</re_restr>
-<re_restr>団栗の背比べ</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ドングリのせいくらべ</reb>
-<re_restr>ドングリの背比べ</re_restr>

思いどおり	84,993	80.5%	
思いどうり	20,592	19.5%

I think so. It should be searchable, at least.

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>どうり</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

いつもどおり	496571	91.1%
いつもどうり	48349	8.9%

do we want to include どうり as ik here?

I agree.

@@ -18,3 +18 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<s_inf>oft. adv. as ～に</s_inf>
+<s_inf>oft. as ～に or ～の</s_inf>

I don't think it's correct to say that 通り itself is an adverb (or adj-no). It's a suffix that *forms* adjectives and adverbs.

makes sense?

@@ -17,0 +18,3 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<s_inf>oft. adv. as ～に</s_inf>

I don't think the note is needed. It also refers to the iron content in minerals.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<s_inf>as a nutrient or in water</s_inf>

GG5

Clarify sense of iron *content* (nutrient etc.)

@@ -16,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>iron</gloss>
+<s_inf>as a nutrient or in water</s_inf>
+<gloss>iron (content)</gloss>

I don't think the 二十四節気 x-ref is needed/helpful.
The kokugos have x-refs between 冬至 and 夏至.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1462020">二十四節気</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1191460">夏至</xref>

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

I agree.

@@ -28,8 +27,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>making sense (of something)</gloss>
-<gloss>understanding</gloss>

mk (doesn't have our 3rd sense)

do we need the 3rd sense? I'm not in favor of including arch words unless there's good reason to (like it being common knowledge, used in a famous poem, etc.)

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -30,0 +32 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

meikyo, daij

Added dated tag to sense 2.
I think this is better for the arch sense.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1596470">聡明</xref>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>smart</gloss>
@@ -31,2 +32,2 @@
-<gloss>being enlightened</gloss>
-<gloss>having the meaning of everything become clear</gloss>
+<gloss>making sense (of something)</gloss>
+<gloss>understanding</gloss>

I think Rene's suggestion in 2010 to move ichi1 to 絨毯 makes the most sense. 絨緞 doesn't need a freq tag.

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi2</ke_pri>
@@ -19,2 +18 @@
-<re_pri>ichi2</re_pri>
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>

Regarding Rene's objection in the comments below, this info is found in the JMdict XML file:
>> The entries marked "ichi2" were demoted from ichi1 because they were observed to have low frequencies in the WWW and newspapers.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 絨毯　　　 │ 565,970 │ 58.4% │
│ 絨緞　　　 │   7,009 │  0.7% │ - rK, demoting to ichi2
│ 絨氈　　　 │     753 │  0.1% │ - [iK] to [sK]
│ じゅうたん │ 348,340 │ 36.0% │
│ ジュータン │  28,699 │  3.0% │
│ ジュウタン │  17,752 │  1.8% │ - [nokanji] to [sk]
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10 +10,2 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_pri>ichi2</ke_pri>
@@ -14 +15 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18 +19 @@
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>ichi2</re_pri>
@@ -27 +28 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>director (of films or plays)</gloss>
+<gloss>director (of a film, play, etc.)</gloss>

@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<gloss>producer</gloss>
-<gloss>director</gloss>
+<gloss>director (of films or plays)</gloss>

gg5, daij

Yes.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1185940">下町・2</xref>
@@ -13,2 +14 @@
-<gloss>working-class accent</gloss>
-<gloss>working-class dialect</gloss>
+<gloss>working-class dialect of the Shitamachi area of Tokyo</gloss>

Isn't it more specific, though?

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>working-class accent or dialect</gloss>
+<gloss>working-class accent</gloss>
+<gloss>working-class dialect</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2412850">山の手言葉</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2412850">山の手言葉</xref>

gg5, luminous, daijr

Shorter.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>care of schoolchildren outside of school time</gloss>
+<gloss>after-school childcare</gloss>

隠し芸	18055	93.2%
裏芸	1321	6.8%

Aligning with 隠し芸 - most JEs simply xref to it.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>act or trick which a performer reserves for selected occasions</gloss>
+<gloss>one's party piece</gloss>
+<gloss>parlor trick</gloss>
+<gloss>hidden talent</gloss>

gg5 has "party trick" etc.

I don't think it's confusing.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>uncle (whi is older than one's parent)</gloss>
+<gloss>uncle (older than one's parent)</gloss>

less confusing

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>uncle (older than one's parent)</gloss>
+<gloss>uncle (whi is older than one's parent)</gloss>

Thanks.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>Rus' (old name of Russia)</gloss>
+<gloss>Rus' (old name for Russia)</gloss>

Aha, daijisen also has ルーシ.
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/ルーシ/

Jawiki has ルーシ族 for "Rus' people." 
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ルーシ族

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────╮
│ ルシ族　 │   0 │
│ ルーシ族 │ 211 │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────╯

This article has ルーシ as a transliteration of Роусь（Rus'）
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/キエフ大公国

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>ルシ</reb>
+<reb>ルーシ</reb>

Is there a source for this?

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

いつも通り	1009485	64.1%
何時も通り	16504	1.0%
いつもどおり	496571	31.5%
いつもとおり	3513	0.2%
いつもどうり	48349	3.1%

@@ -17,0 +18,4 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>いつもどうり</reb>

いつも通り	1009485	66.1%
何時も通り	16504	1.1% -sK
いつもどおり	496571	32.5%
いつもとおり	3513	0.2% - ik to sk

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17 +18 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

いつも通り	1009485
いつもの通り	142923

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1188910">何時もの通りに</xref>

シャーペン	154957	69.6%
シャープペン	67827	30.4%
some of these ngrams seem to be from シャープペンシル but not all:

シャープペンの	9253
シャープペンを	6017

jpwiki: 略称で「シャープ」、「シャーペン」とも呼ばれ、「シャープペン」の表記も一般に見られる

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>シャープペン</reb>

gg5, prog, luminous

lsrc tag not needed on the abbreviated form.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">sharp pencil</lsource>
@@ -17,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>propelling pencil</gloss>

シャーペン	154957	99.5%
シャアペン	826	0.5%

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Only gets a minute fraction of the hits.

@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

And スカンディナヴィア is in gg5 and koj. Removing [sk] tag.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>スカンディナヴィア</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -10,4 +12,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>スカンディナヴィア</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

スカンディナビア is in daijirin. Tagging as [rk].

@@ -8,2 +8,2 @@
-<reb>スカンディナヴィア</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+<reb>スカンディナビア</reb>
+<re_inf>&rk;</re_inf>
@@ -12 +12 @@
-<reb>スカンディナビア</reb>
+<reb>スカンディナヴィア</reb>

スカンジナビア	94648	89.4%
スカンディナヴィア	5879	5.6%
スカンディナビア	2813	2.7%
スカンジナヴィア	2479	2.3%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -16 +17 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

jwiki uses スカンディナヴィア
Note that スカンディナヴィア comes from Swedish/Danish/Norwegian while スカンジナビア comes from English

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

gg5

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>big fire (buildings, etc. on fire)</gloss>
+<gloss>large fire</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>after a -nai stem; attributive form of ざり</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after a -nai stem; attributive form of 〜ざり</s_inf>

daijr: 現代語では，主に文章語的な表現として用いられる

We don't use [adj-f] for suffixes or auxiliary verbs.
Changing [arch] to [form].

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -12,2 +11,2 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<s_inf>attributive form of 〜ざり; equivalent to modern 〜ない</s_inf>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<s_inf>after a -nai stem; attributive form of ざり</s_inf>

daijr, daijs, meikyo

Proposals: Adding the [adj-f] tag as ざる is the 連体形 of ざり and, barring instances of 係り結び, acts exclusively as a premodifier - Note: in ざるを得ない the nominal is omitted as the conjugation + rest of phrase structure already implicate its existence.
Minor additions to notes and a minor change in wording as calling it a "form of ない" may incorrectly lead someone to believe that it is one of its inflections.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<s_inf>literary form of -ない</s_inf>
+<s_inf>attributive form of 〜ざり; equivalent to modern 〜ない</s_inf>

no entry exists for ず

@@ -9,2 +9,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2428160">ざり</xref>
-<xref type="see">ず</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2428160">ざり・1</xref>

Entry created

gg5, daij

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>chaplain (e.g. of a prison)</gloss>
+<gloss>(prison) chaplain</gloss>

教戒師	706	11.9%
教誨師	5241	88.1%

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>教戒師</keb>
+<keb>教誨師</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>教誨師</keb>
+<keb>教戒師</keb>

Entry created

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&grmyth;</field>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ パンドラの箱　 │ 98,398 │ 86.8% │
│ パンドラの匣　 │ 14,629 │ 12.9% │ 🡠 adding (meikyo)
│ パンドラのはこ │    298 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>パンドラの匣</keb>

@@ -11,0 +11,1 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12,1 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>

I don't think that is needed.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>uncle (who is younger than one's parent)</gloss>
+<gloss>uncle (younger than one's parent)</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>uncle (younger than one's parent)</gloss>
+<gloss>uncle (who is younger than one's parent)</gloss>

Entry created

プチッ	114,229	96.9%	
プチっ	3,680	3.1%
sense 2:
https://minamino-kaze.site/mustar-ne/
マスタードの粒をつぶさず使用し、プチッとした食感が特徴のマスタードです
sense 3:
https://www.kusurinomadoguchi.com/column/articles/month-thing
口の中にプチッとした水ぶくれのような透明な赤いものができたことありませんか？

Aligning.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -12 +13,7 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2192340">ポチっ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2192340">ポチッ・1</xref>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>with a click (of a button or switch)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -15 +22,9 @@
-<gloss>with a click (beep)</gloss>
+<gloss>crisply</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2192340">ポチッ・2</xref>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>one (small protrusion, hole, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>single</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

Entry created

今まで通り	274654	60.4%
今までどおり	166677	36.6%
今までどうり	13751	3.0%

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>今までどうり</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

reverso example: 中国の消費者はフォード車が高くなっても日本、ドイツ、フランスなどから今まで通りの価格で車を輸入できる。

Not always a "manner".

@@ -17,2 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>in the same manner as before</gloss>
-<gloss>the same as always</gloss>
+<gloss>(in the same way) as before</gloss>
+<gloss>as always</gloss>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>imperative form of ～ます; attaches to -masu stem of an honorific verb; used to make a polite request or demand</s_inf>
+<s_inf>imperative form of ～ます; attaches to the -masu stem of an honorific verb; used to make a polite request or demand</s_inf>

daijr, daijs, meikyo

Changed [aux] into [aux-v], edited notes to clarify word origin and to correct the following point: ませ does not attach to the imperative of another verb, it attaches to the 連用形 just as ます does: なさいます→なさいませ; なさい, いらっしゃい、etc being used as Imperatives without ませ is due to its omission: those verbs were not originally Imperatives themselves and became what they are due to ませ's subtraction.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>following the imperative form of an honorific verb; used to make a polite request or demand</s_inf>
+<s_inf>imperative form of ～ます; attaches to -masu stem of an honorific verb; used to make a polite request or demand</s_inf>
@@ -18 +18 @@
-<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>

daij

Just greetings.

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>used to increase the politeness of a greeting, apology, etc.</gloss>
+<misc>&pol;</misc>
+<gloss>used to increase the politeness of a greeting</gloss>

OK. Leave it.

Maybe, but expressions like "お帰りなさいませ", "いらっしゃいませ", "行ってらっしゃいませ", etc. don't usually contain "please" when translated into English.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2210290">ます</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2210290">ます・1</xref>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>used to make a polite request or demand</s_inf>
+<s_inf>following the imperative form of an honorific verb; used to make a polite request or demand</s_inf>

Thanks for the comments.
We could have extended discussions on where and how to represent morphology and etymology, but these comments are NOT the appropriate forum. Please feel free to raise an issue in the Github forum if you wish. 
https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Issues_Forum

This is strictly morphology that the reader can apply to their use of the language, for example: knowing it is made from ん and what ん derives from allows them to correctly predict the existence of ませぬ - or - if someone learns of ぬ through ません and learns from ぬ's entry its function/meaning and how it is morphologically added to other words, then they would be equipped to locate and understand every single instance of ぬ or ん they find from thereon, as well as to use it themselves. Is this not a benefit for the reader?
This is in line with the editorial policy that lists "where there is a derivational relationship between words that it is useful to highlight, e.g. between かっけー and 格好いい, or between オケる and 空オケ." as a cross-reference that can enhance the value of the entry; this is fundamentally the same as the given examples - and with ぬ being a productive morpheme, morphology notes and references would be even more useful.
Now, I do agree that it is not all etymology and/or morphology that should be added: here there is a positive impact for the learner's understanding and practice. Contrast this with something such as adding "changed over time from まゐらす to まらする, まする, culminating in ます" to the ます entry. The latter would be a truly useless historical etymology that does not help readers to understand what something means, how it comes to mean it, nor how to use it.


I understand that the dictionary is not here to teach morphology, but it is here to teach Japanese and morphology just cannot not be useful in such a highly agglutinative language - in fact, it is not only useful, it is required for its use: it is the necessity of morphology that led you to add "after the -masu stem of a verb" to this very entry, it is morphology that dictates we have separate verb classes and it is morphology that distinguishes verbs from adjectives and tells you how to use each. 
If we are ignoring any mention of etymological and/or morphological information and concern ourselves only with self-contained semantic/functional minimalism, we might as well remove: the left half of the note in this entry along with all 3 cross-references, the cross-reference to 格好いい in かっけー, as well as any other similarly substantiated note or reference in any and all entries. We could even remove the tags for 動詞 and 形容詞 and neatly bundle them under a category for 述語 since that is the all-encompassing superset. Nonetheless, I think you will agree that would make the dictionary less useful as it would lose much of its power to teach usage - which directly affects ability to teach identification and thus, comprehension - and completely lose any information about derivative connections, all because of morphology and etymology.

Do you believe that usage, identification, and relations are not something that a cross-linguistic dictionary should seek to teach? Is it not what the reader seeks to learn? If you do think so, then what does it seek to teach? Raw semantic correspondence? If you give yourself the bother to think about these questions, consider: Every time someone conjugates something, they are engaging with morphology. Every time you add an [adj] tag to something, you are teaching them about it.

Since we're not attempting to explain the etymology.

How would the cross-reference to ん be redundant? As it is, there is no way for one to know that the ん in ません is the negative ぬ・ん from simply looking at this entry.

I agree with Robin on the etymology, etc. The xref to ん is quite redundant.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2139720">ん・3</xref>

I wouldn't object to it.

It would have to be a separate entry. But I'm not sure it's needed given that we have a "mechanical pencil" sense for シャープ.

シャー芯	6339	71.7%
シャープ芯	2117	23.9%
シャーペン芯	387	4.4%

worth including シャープ芯 here? note needs to be changed if we're not making it sk

https://www.weblio.jp/content/シャー芯

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>from シャーペン + 芯</s_inf>

シャー芯	6339

I feel there should be a note saying it's from "sharp lead".

I agree.

I don't think we need etymological info for an archaic term. Shinmeikai doesn't mention it. I also don't think it's helpful to describe it as a "supplementary form". It's not clear what it means.
I don't object to splitting out sense 2 into a separate entry.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
@@ -10,2 +9,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2829645">ず</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2150170">あり・3</xref>
@@ -13 +11 @@
-<s_inf>supplementary form of 〜ず, from 〜ずあり; used after a -nai stem</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after a -nai stem</s_inf>

daijr, daijs, meikyo

Proposals: Slightly more detailed explanation concerning morphology/etymology. Cross-references to the morphemes that make up said morphology/etymology. Addition of tag [vr]; being made from あり has the consequence of ざり's conjugation table being of the ラ変 pattern.
Removal of [2] and subsequent relocation into its own entry as the two ざり bear no direct connection to each other; however, as this last suggestion is not consistent with other entries that will often group distinct homographs under one item - such as the entry for the auxiliary ない - I will not object to its rejection.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+<pos>&vr;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2829645">ず</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2150170">あり・3</xref>
@@ -10 +13 @@
-<s_inf>from 〜ずあり; used after a -nai stem</s_inf>
+<s_inf>supplementary form of 〜ず, from 〜ずあり; used after a -nai stem</s_inf>
@@ -12,6 +14,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<s_inf>from 〜ぞあり; usu. as 〜にざりける</s_inf>
-<gloss>is</gloss>
-<gloss>are</gloss>

@@ -10,2 +10,2 @@
-<s_inf>from 〜ずあり</s_inf>
-<gloss>(used after a -nai stem) not ...</gloss>
+<s_inf>from 〜ずあり; used after a -nai stem</s_inf>
+<gloss>not</gloss>

Sankoku added a third sense in its 8th edition:
  ③〔稲刈りの前に〕田んぼの水をぬくこと。

@@ -19,0 +20,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>draining (of a rice paddy before harvest)</gloss>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

GG5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2162260">ボーイズラブ</xref>
@@ -13,2 +14 @@
-<s_inf>used by Boys' Love fans</s_inf>
-<gloss>male pregnancy</gloss>
+<gloss>male pregnancy (in Boy's Love fiction)</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=boys'+love

ref above talks about novels

maybe m-sl?

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2827363">プレパパ</xref>

Possibly.

col?

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>partner of a pregnant woman</gloss>
+<gloss>expectant father</gloss>

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">pre papa</lsource>
+<xref type="see" seq="2846280">プレママ</xref>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">pre-papa</lsource>

Aligning.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">pre+papa</lsource>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">pre papa</lsource>

Aligning.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2745550">コミュニケーション能力・コミュニケーションのうりょく</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2745550">コミュニケーション能力</xref>
@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>communication skills</gloss>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙
コミュ力	3001

I don't think there's a case for [adj-f]. The etymology is not really appropriate here.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -13 +12 @@
-<s_inf>attributive form of き, auxiliary verb indicating directly experienced or factual past; roughly equivalent to modern 〜た</s_inf>
+<s_inf>equiv. of modern 〜た</s_inf>

daijr, daijs, meikyo

Added [adj-f] as し is 連体形. Edited notes to include more information with the intent of avoiding potential confusion.

I would also like to include how it connects to verbs but き has irregular coupling methods to both サ変 and カ変 verbs that I fear would leave the entry too long and not including them might make it seem like it does not do so at all; Apologies if this is the wrong place to ask but has something such as a section that includes the inflection paradigms of irregular verbs as well as notes on more specific irregularities such as these ever been considered? Items that would benefit from this would be honorifics such as なさる and おっしゃる, as well as ます and defective helpers such as ぬ・ず and う・よう, and also archaisms such as べし・べき; pretty much anything with some irregularity, whether true or perceived, that the learner cannot foresee and consequently tends to struggle to identify.

@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<pos>&aux;</pos>
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<s_inf>literary form of 〜た</s_inf>
+<s_inf>attributive form of き, auxiliary verb indicating directly experienced or factual past; roughly equivalent to modern 〜た</s_inf>

I think an xref is enough.

@@ -8,0 +9,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2178970">選ばれし者・えらばれしもの</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2654250">た・1</xref>
@@ -10 +12 @@
-<s_inf>literary form of -た-, e.g. 選ばれし者</s_inf>
+<s_inf>literary form of 〜た</s_inf>

format based on ざる

col?

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>expectant mother</gloss>

Looks better with a hyphen.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">pre mama</lsource>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">pre-mama</lsource>

Probably not (although that's how Daijirin does it.) I was matching プレパパ.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">pre+mama</lsource>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">pre mama</lsource>

Do we need the plus in the lsrc?

smk has 攙入 in the headword line and 竄入 in a note at the end (「竄入」と書くこともある。).

The n-gram counts are so low for both forms that I think it would be better to drop the [rK] tag.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

meikyo, gg5

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>
@@ -19 +20 @@
-<gloss>running (into)</gloss>
+<gloss>running into</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +26 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>
@@ -25,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>being included by mistake</gloss>

koj daij meikyo gg5 
攙入  only in mk, prob rK? (ngrams down)

Thanks.

chn = Chinook

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chn">gōngbǎo jīdīng</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">gōngbǎo jīdīng</lsource>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/宮保鶏丁

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chn" ls_wasei="y">gōngbǎo jīdīng</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chn">gōngbǎo jīdīng</lsource>

宮保鶏丁	1059
ゴンバオジーディン	No matches
宮保ジーディン	No matches
宮保チキン	No matches
ゴンバオチキン	No matches

Aligning.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>(breakfast) cereal</gloss>

コーンフレークス	1,455
コーンフレーク	83,390

Split from 1049710.

Closing

I think separation is best in this case. I'll confirm it, then reopen for a while.

Normally we'd just do a note, "esp. 哺育", no?

Meikyo does too. Maybe it's worth having separate entries just to show that 哺育 is the more common form for this meaning.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>保育</keb>

daijs

gg5 追加語彙, daijirin

Sankoku mentions this word in its entry for 体感:
  統計の数字ではなく、直接に感じる治安のよしあし

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ 体感治安　　　 │ 6,016 │
│ たいかんちあん │     0 │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴───────╯

wikt: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/鋭アクセント

GG5 英和コンピューター用語辞典
鋭アクセント　 491

KOD

gg5 追加語彙 (redirects to やりにくい).

〈遣（り）／やり／ヤリ〉〈辛／づら／ヅラ／ずら／ズラ〉〈い／イ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ やり辛い　 │  9,428 │ 10.6% │
│ 遣り辛い　 │    188 │  0.2% │
│ 遣りづらい │    141 │  0.2% │
│ ヤリ辛い　 │     67 │  0.1% │
│ やりづらい │ 60,143 │ 67.7% │
│ やりずらい │ 18,491 │ 20.8% │
│ ヤリズライ │     75 │  0.1% │
│ ヤリづらい │     69 │  0.1% │
│ ヤリヅライ │     69 │  0.1% │
│ やりズライ │     42 │  0.0% │
│ ヤリずらい │     37 │  0.0% │
│ やりヅライ │     34 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

Lifted glosses from やりにくい

Split from 1408340.

KOD: 	【植】 〔ウコギ科の高木〕 an ivy tree; Schefflera octophylla.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

wiki daijs sekaidaihyakkajiten
common name from EOL


鱶の木	0	0.0%
フカノキ	358	91.6%
ふかのき	33	8.4%

normally I wouldn't make the kanji rK when the word itself isn't all that common but the word doesn't seem obscure to me looking at Google

https://magazine.cainz.com/article/18783
ホンコンカポック（シェフレラ）の育て方とは？

sekaidaihyakkajiten フカノキ
小葉が幅広く丸みのある変種は観賞価値が高く，ホンコンカポックcv.Hong Kongの名で普及している。しかし，キワタ科のカポックとは関係のない植物である。

ホンコンカポック	3555	36.1%
香港カポック	856	8.7%
シェフレラ	5450	55.3%
シェフレーラ	0	0.0%

KOD

https://plantura.garden/uk/houseplants/umbrella-plant/umbrella-plant-care

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>umbrella plant</gloss>

https://magazine.cainz.com/article/18783
ホンコンカポック（シェフレラ）の育て方とは？

sekaidaihyakkajiten フカノキ
小葉が幅広く丸みのある変種は観賞価値が高く，ホンコンカポックcv.Hong Kongの名で普及している。しかし，キワタ科のカポックとは関係のない植物である。

ホンコンカポック	3555	36.1%
香港カポック	856	8.7%
シェフレラ	5450	55.3%
シェフレーラ	0	0.0%　nipp has this (シエフレーラ)

"schefflera" is not normally capitalized when it refers to a member of the genus rather than the genus itself. formally the genus name is フカノキ属, apparently.

gg5 daijs nikk nipp wiki
スカンジナビア半島	7394	85.1%
スカンディナヴィア半島	1291	14.9%

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scandinavian_Peninsula

major geographic features are ok in jmdict, right?

wisdom

wiki gg5 daijr

daijs; nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/耐陰性-1714963

gg5

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/13時
Plenty of WWW examples.

Worth including? It might not be obvious for people in countries where the 24h clock notation is common. Also, we currently have entries from ０時～１２時.

mk gg5 (【農】)

https://my-best.com/2233
バークチップとは、赤松や黒松などの松の樹皮を粉砕したあとに周りの角ばった部分を丸く加工したウッドチップで、マルチングとして使用されます。プランター・植木鉢・庭の木の根元に敷き詰めてある、茶色い木くずのようなものがバークチップです。

バークチップ	3689

I think it's a noun. Daijs has ジャストフィット as a noun.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>exactly the right size and shape</gloss>

I see it's being used in many recent tweets.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーーー─┬────╮
│ シンデレラフィット　 │ 53 │
│ シンデレラ・フィット │  0 │
╰─ーーーーーーーーーー─┴────╯

We have ジャストフィット tagged as an expression. Maybe [n] would be better.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>シンデレラ・フィット</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,2 +11,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>to fit perfectly in shape</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">Cinderella fit</lsource>
+<gloss>perfect fit</gloss>
+<gloss>exactly the right size and shape</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/シンデレラフィット

gg5 daijr

https://www.kakejiku-eizawa.com/artist/1808/

Not common. Results for 「漆書き」 show shogi sets. Some web hits for 「漆書」, like above, are for the calligraphy style of Chinese artist 金農.

nikk (also has うるしがき)

漆書	1914	63.2%
漆書き	817	27.0%
うるし書	297	9.8%
うるし書き	0	0.0%

Fork

A bit literal but maybe it works.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>now deceased</gloss>

今は無き	65611	21.2%
今は亡き	184268	59.6%
今はなき	59411	19.2%

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q10232535310

Maybe better

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -15 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>no longer alive</gloss>
+<gloss>departed</gloss>
+<gloss>deceased</gloss>

今は無き	65611	21.2%
今は亡き	184268	59.6%
今はなき	59411	19.2%

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q10232535310

今は無き	65611	21.2%
今は亡き	184268	59.6%
今はなき	59411	19.2%

https://www.okeihan.net/navi/kyoto_tsu/tsu202009.php
今は無き風景

gg5

http://db.yamagata-museum.jp/muse/earth-science/search.php?-max=25&-skip=875
>> 球顆の見られる岩石。球顆はスフェルライトとも呼ばれる。

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬─────╮
│ スフェルライト │  98 │
│ 球顆　　　　　 │ 336 │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴─────╯

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

Trimming. No need to repeat the "arch".

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<s_inf>auxiliary verb indicating directly experienced or factual past; roughly equivalent to modern 〜た</s_inf>
+<s_inf>equiv. of modern 〜た</s_inf>

daijr, daijs, meikyo

Proposing this for completion's sake, since し has its own entry.

Probably not worth it.

I see about 5 legitimate usages on twitter between 2016-2018.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────╮
│ 自修書 │     0 │
│ 自習書 │ 4,936 │
╰─ーーー─┴───────╯

Could be merged with 自習書 as a hidden form.

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

G n-grams: No matches

Very obscure. Only in GG5. 竄入 + 者. I don't think this is needed.

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

gg5, saito
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mud_pie

〈泥／どろ／ドロ〉〈饅／まん／マン〉〈頭／じゅう／ジュウ／ジュー〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬─────╮
│ 泥饅頭　　　　 │ 262 │
│ 泥まんじゅう　 │ 268 │
│ どろまんじゅう │  74 │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴─────╯

I've never heard of a dirt pie.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>泥まんじゅう</keb>
@@ -12 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>dirt pie</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oland_(Frisian_island)
separate island

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>Oland</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>Oland</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Oland (island)</gloss>
+<gloss>Öland (Sweden)</gloss>

Merge with 5043096, 5043094, 5043089, 5043088

@@ -5,0 +6,12 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スカンディナヴィア</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スカンディナビア</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スカンジナヴィア</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スカンジナビヤ</reb>

Merge with 5043085

Merge with 5043085

Merge with 5043085

Merge with 5043085

https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/30

Yes, I proposed that in 2021, for entries like this with just a surname. I'd prefer that. Best to use the issue if it needs further discussion.
Note that ヨハンゼバスティアンバッハ and バッハ are treated differently.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Anton Bruckner (1824-96; Austrian composer)</gloss>
+<gloss>Bruckner, Anton (1824-96; Austrian composer)</gloss>

On GitHub, Marcus proposed a "Bach, Johann Sebastian (1685-1750; German composer)" format for surname-only [person] entries, which Jim approved of. Is there a reason we're not using this? I prefer it. GG5 also uses this format.

Our usual format now

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Bruckner, Anton (1824-96), Austrian composer</gloss>
+<gloss>Anton Bruckner (1824-96; Austrian composer)</gloss>

https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/30

Proposed structure.

@@ -9 +9,5 @@
-<gloss>Bruckner (19th-century Austrian composer)</gloss>
+<gloss>Bruckner</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<misc>&person;</misc>
+<gloss>Bruckner, Anton (1824-96), Austrian composer</gloss>

Comment by Marcus in JMdict regarding ポランド:
>> I get 1 hit for "ポランド記法."
>> I think a majority of the 13k hits aren't actually related to the country.

daijs (has ッド but フレード in an entry on Gripsholm Slott.)


マリエフレド	0	0.0%
マリエフレッド	130	100.0%
マリエフレード	0	0.0%

フレード is the closest to the Swedish pronunciation so I'm moving it to the front.

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マリエフレード</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マリエフレッド</reb>
+</r_ele>