daijr: 地震による災害。

I think "earthquake disaster" is sufficient for this entry. We have "highly destructive earthquake" for 大震災.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>(highly) deadly earthquake</gloss>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>(highly) deadly earthquake</gloss>

GG5, etc.

gg5, prog, luminous

@@ -16,2 +16,4 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>telegraph</gloss>
+<gloss>(electric) telegraph</gloss>
+<gloss>telegraphy</gloss>
+<gloss>telegraphic communication</gloss>
+<gloss>telegram</gloss>

gg5

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>leukaemia</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

gg5, prog, luminous
発電	4,251,387		
發電	1,407

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,2 +23,4 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>generation (e.g. power)</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>generation of electricity</gloss>
+<gloss>power generation</gloss>
@@ -28,0 +31,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Sense 2 is in my 昭和３ JE (as 發電). Quite obsolete now.

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>發電</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,0 +29 @@
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
@@ -25,0 +31 @@
+<gloss>telegraphing</gloss>

not sure there's enough evidence of this usage in Japanese 
to include (from some light googling), but it seems it is 
used in this meaning in Chinese:
http://cjjc.weblio.jp/content/発電
(wiktionary)

I've repeatedly seen this word in books apparently used to mean "sending a telegram". For example, "海軍は、大海令十三号を博恭王軍令部総長名で、上海の長谷川第三艦隊司令長官に発電している。"

I found one example of this on ejje.weblio.jp.
http://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/"ロンドン発電に曰く"

@@ -21,0 +22,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>sending a telegram</gloss>
+</sense>

I thought it might not hurt to have as a third gloss, but as you say it doesn't really add too much.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>hug</gloss>

https://chigai-hikaku.com/?p=68951
「抱っこ」と「ハグ」の違いを、分かりやすく解説します。

甘えたいと思う幼い子供や、泣きやまない赤ちゃんを完全に腕の中に抱き上げてあやす行為を「抱っこ」といいます。

もう一方の「ハグ」は交流したいと思う人と会ったとき行なうか、相手と共感する気持ちを伝えるときにやる行為です。

https://ja.hinative.com/questions/21735140
all answers mention lifting of the ground "相手の体が地面から離れるように持ち上げる" "抱いて持ち上げる" "抱きかかえる。carry"

https://ameblo.jp/gu214/entry-12494632829.html
ホールドとハグの違い
(抱っこと抱きしめるの違い)...[だっこ:]抱き上げる(持ち上げる)→支える→ゆらす...ハグとは違います。

asked native informer: ハグという意味で使える? "そう言われたら通じるけど、使わないかな"

だく・だかれる has an ambiguity in it, it means both to carry (a baby) and to hug without carrying (even if だく by itself, outside of compounds, isn't frequently used with that 2nd meaning). In the case of 抱っこ, this ambiguity isn't really there, to my understanding. "Hug" does maybe to a small extent have the same ambiguity but I don't think including it adds much, but distracts some.

I can't speak as to what was happening in the quoted manga.

The typical [chn] word for "hug" is ギュー or ギュッ.

All the kokugos have 「だくこと。だかれること。」 for this word.
gg5: give 《a baby》 「a hug ［（a hug and） a cuddle］

"hug" seems fine.

Guessing that the [ichi1] tags weren't intended to be dropped.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
@@ -16,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>hug</gloss>

I have in here a manga scene with a girlfriend and boyfriend, sitting on the ground and the boyfriend sat behind her and wrapped his arms around her, and her immediate thought to this was "だ・・・だっこ"

so it is definitely not carrying only

It only means hugging as in hugging something 
while carrying it e.g. a kid hugging a teddy  bear.

抱っこ! is the same as Up! in English. Useful to include because "up" is not obvious

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -10 +8,0 @@
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
@@ -17 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>hug</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +16,7 @@
+<gloss>holding</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<misc>&chn;</misc>
+<gloss>up!</gloss>
+<gloss>carry me</gloss>

Noun, so not really an antonym.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1183990">音読・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1183990">音読・1</xref>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Ant

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1183990">音読・1</xref>

Daijirin: …自分のものとして発表すること。…「他人の意匠を━する」

JEs have "piracy" but I don't think that fits.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 剽窃　　　 │ 20,531 │ 90.3% │
│ ひょう窃　 │    645 │  2.8% │ - sK
│ 剽竊　　　 │    129 │  0.6% │ - add, sK (kyuujitai)
│ ひょうせつ │  1,430 │  6.3% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>剽竊</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -19 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>piracy</gloss>

Correct POS order
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -17 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

The priority-tagged Tatoeba sentence uses ほ乳.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 哺乳　　 │ 448,653 │ 85.6% │
│ ほ乳　　 │  71,128 │ 13.6% │ - add, sK
│ ほにゅう │   4,194 │  0.8% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ほ乳</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

哺乳	448653
哺乳し	1584

I don't think "lactation" should lead.
vs in the JEs and meikyo.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>lactation</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>lactation</gloss>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>nursing</gloss>

J-Es and kokugos

"Mammal" is 「哺乳動物」

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>mammal</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 哺乳動物　　　　 │ 41,310 │ 93.6% │
│ ほ乳動物　　　　 │  2,696 │  6.1% │ - sK
│ ほにゅうどうぶつ │    128 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

〈哺／ほ／ホ〉〈乳／にゅう／ニュウ〉〈瓶／びん／ビン〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 哺乳瓶　　　 │ 216,620 │ 53.0% │
│ 哺乳びん　　 │ 109,173 │ 26.7% │
│ ほ乳びん　　 │  27,510 │  6.7% │
│ ほ乳瓶　　　 │  25,999 │  6.4% │
│ 哺乳ビン　　 │  19,596 │  4.8% │
│ ほ乳ビン　　 │   7,212 │  1.8% │
│ ほにゅう瓶　 │     426 │  0.1% │
│ ホ乳瓶　　　 │     222 │  0.1% │
│ ホニュウ瓶　 │     134 │  0.0% │
│ ホ乳ビン　　 │     105 │  0.0% │
│ ほにゅうびん │   1,169 │  0.3% │
│ ほにゅうビン │     374 │  0.1% │
│ ホニュウビン │     317 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

Adding some more forms.

@@ -7,0 +8,7 @@
+<keb>哺乳びん</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ほ乳びん</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +16,8 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>哺乳ビン</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ほ乳ビン</keb>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_bottle

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>nursing bottle</gloss>
+<gloss>feeding bottle</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 哺乳瓶　　　 │ 216,620 │ 88.9% │
│ ほ乳瓶　　　 │  25,999 │ 10.7% │
│ ほにゅうびん │   1,169 │  0.5% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 哺乳類　　　 │ 323,155 │ 84.7% │
│ ほ乳類　　　 │  55,627 │ 14.6% │
│ ほにゅうるい │   2,646 │  0.7% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog, luminous

@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>telegraph</gloss>
+<gloss>telegraphing</gloss>
+<gloss>wiring</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, RP

@@ -13,2 +13,4 @@
-<gloss>subsiding</gloss>
-<gloss>falling (cave) in</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>subsidence</gloss>
+<gloss>depression</gloss>
+<gloss>sinking</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +18,8 @@
+<gloss>caving in</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<field>&biol;</field>
+<gloss>invagination</gloss>

Yes. GG5's version is a bit clunky.

Isn't this better?

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>(Chinese-style figure of a) lion</gloss>
+<gloss>Chinese-style figure of a lion</gloss>

GG5: 	a (Chinese-style figure of a) lion.
ルミナス: 	(ライオン) lion; (装飾的な) artistic rendering of a lion 
大辞泉: has artistic renderings in another sense
The JEs lead with からしし, but the kokugos say it's the old form.

@@ -19,0 +20,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>(Chinese-style figure of a) lion</gloss>
+<gloss>artistic rendering of a lion</gloss>
+</sense>

furigana.info
からじし	75.0%
からしし	25.0%

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/karajishi
Borrowed from Japanese 唐獅子.
A guardian lion figure found in Chinese and Japanese art. 

https://www.yokoyama-art.com/shopping/p-571.php
Chinese Guardian Lions "Karajishi "

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/唐獅子
The japanese wikipedia entry has a photo of a temple statue (ie. 獅子[2]].

唐獅子牡丹
https://www.sunsurf.jp/news/755/
The Hawaiian shirt, known as “Karajishi-Botan” or “Mythical Lion and Peony Flower” if translated directly into English...

https://www.clevelandart.org/art/1924.351.2
Guardian Animal: Karashishi (wooden statue/carving)
唐獅子
1300s
Placed at the entrance to shrines and temples in Japan, guardian figures ward off evil spirits. These guardians used to be painted red and white and are distinguishable by their facial expressions: the open-mouthed animal is a karashishi, or “Chinese lion,” while the close-mouthed beast, which once had a single horn protruding from its head, is called a komainu, or “Korean dog.” 

Plenty of "Chinese Lion" here.
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/唐獅子

https://www.britannica.com/art/karajishi
…called komainu (“Korean dogs”) or karajishi (“Chinese lions”) are placed in front of a shrine. Originally they served to protect the sacred buildings from evil and defilements.

Wiktionary says "karajishi" is an English word now.  Didn't add the gloss though.

Reversed the readings. MacOS IME supports only じし,　sankoku gives only じし, wikipedia articles seem to use じし, furigana.info is 15-to-5 in favor of this reading.
 
As for the xref, it seems clear that 獅子 can mean 唐獅子, so maybe the reverse xref is more necessary. I think the entry in 獅子[2] is perhaps overly specific (or that a third, more general "mythical Chinese lion" sense may be warranted). Or we can just let the xrefs do the heavy lifting. It seems that *some* shinto 獅子 are 唐獅子, but that 唐獅子 does not generally indicate a statue. 

Google the English "karashishi" or "karajishi".  Lots of English-language treatments of this term which literally translates to Chinese (唐) + Chinese Lion(獅子).  Examples are bountiful. Usually appears simply as "Chinese lion", but this would be ambiguous without context. 

Obviously all representations are artistic. "Chinese lions" are mythical.  Nothing about "portrait" baked into 唐獅子 though.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>からしし</reb>
+<reb>からじし</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>からじし</reb>
+<reb>からしし</reb>
@@ -15 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>(artistic portrait of a) lion</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1311070">獅子・2</xref>
+<gloss>(mythical) Chinese lion</gloss>
+<gloss>Chinese guardian lion</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 哺乳期 │ 2,450 │ 84.8% │
│ ほ乳期 │   439 │ 15.2% │
╰─ーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ほ乳期</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

GG5 has "highly destructive earthquake", which I prefer.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>highly deadly earthquake</gloss>
+<gloss>highly destructive earthquake</gloss>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>highly deadly earthquake</gloss>

See 震災 entry. More likely to refer to 2011 today.

@@ -17,6 +16,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1811760">関東大震災</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>Great Kanto earthquake (1923)</gloss>

I don't think that xref is helpful. A better "anat" or "contrast with " xref would be 非営利法人 (an entry in daijr).

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1273250">公益法人・1</xref>
-<gloss>profit-making corporation</gloss>
+<gloss>for-profit corporation</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1273250">公益法人</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1273250">公益法人・1</xref>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1273250">公益法人</xref>

sankoku

I don't think "telephone conversation" is right. In GG5's example, 件 is what refers to the substance of the call.

@@ -13,2 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>(making a) telephone call</gloss>
-<gloss>(having a) telephone conversation</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<gloss>making a phone call</gloss>

Daijr: "電話をかけること"
GG5: "〔電話をかけること〕 calling; dialing", but also "先日架電の件についてご返事をお待ちしております. I await your response to what we discussed on the phone the other day."

Seems to be more the act of calling, although GG5's example makes it look like the substance of a call.
No ref for sense 2, so I'm dropping it.

@@ -13,7 +13,4 @@
-<gloss>telephone call</gloss>
-<gloss>telephone conversation</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>email</gloss>
+<gloss>(making a) telephone call</gloss>
+<gloss>(having a) telephone conversation</gloss>
+<gloss>calling</gloss>
+<gloss>dialing</gloss>

daijs

source for sense 2? not in any dictionary I have access to

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +18,1 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

〈庭／にわ／ニワ〉〈付（き）／附（き）／つき／ツキ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 庭付き　 │ 120,764 │ 90.0% │
│ 庭付　　 │   8,892 │  6.6% │ - add, sK
│ 庭つき　 │   4,409 │  3.3% │ - add, sK
│ にわつき │     101 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>庭付</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>庭つき</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Maybe both.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>having a garden</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>having a garden</gloss>
+<gloss>with a garden</gloss>

NHK日本語発音アクセント辞典

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ていづき</reb>
+<reb>にわつき</reb>
@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

I'd stick with "oft.". Blend in the には case.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>sometimes as ...に忍びない</s_inf>
+<s_inf>oft. as ...に(は)忍びない</s_inf>

It's a significantly higher proportion if you include には忍びない (essentially the same form). I think "often" is fine. We only use "sometimes" notes for variant forms/kanji/etc. I suspect that に(は)忍びない dominates in literature. In Aozora, it accounts for 79% of 忍びない usage.

https://grammar.reverso.net/frequency/

To me it seems like "often" implies more than 20% of the time.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>oft. as ...に忍びない</s_inf>
+<s_inf>sometimes as ...に忍びない</s_inf>

に忍びない	10,290

All the kokugos have the same note, and all the examples in the refs are of this form. I think the note is helpful as it's not standard grammar.

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<s_inf>usu. in the form 〜するに忍びない</s_inf>
+<s_inf>oft. as ...に忍びない</s_inf>
+<gloss>cannot bear (doing)</gloss>
@@ -16 +17 @@
-<gloss>unable to bear (e.g. seeing)</gloss>
+<gloss>reluctant (to do)</gloss>

〈糸／いと／イト〉〈偏／へん／ヘン〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 糸偏　　 │ 2,657 │ 49.3% │
│ 糸へん　 │ 2,436 │ 45.2% │ - add (sankoku)
│ 糸ヘン　 │   297 │  5.5% │
│ いとへん │ 7,713 │  N/A  │
│ イトヘン │   572 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>糸へん</keb>

Sankoku, meikyo, and shinsen have the second sense tagged as 俗

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

Entry created

Not that comfortable, but I see we have KK as a gloss in the 株式会社 entry.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>GK</gloss>

I saw "Amazon Japan, GK" (or perhaps "G.K.") flicker by when buying something on Amazon.  Shouldn't we inclhde GK as a gloss?

Looks good.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/合同会社
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gōdō_gaisha

I think something like this is better.
My refs only have the がいしゃ reading.

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ごうどうかいしゃ</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -15,2 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>limited liability company</gloss>
-<gloss>LLC</gloss>
+<gloss>gōdō gaisha</gloss>
+<gloss>Japanese LLC</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">form of business modeled after the American limited liability company</gloss>

Reverso (almost always has either "limited liability company" or "LLC").
Wikipedia says this is the form based on US, etc. models and replaced the 有限会社;

I think this is how it goes best in English. If we want "GK" too we'd better include "Gōdō Kaisha".

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>limited liability company (company structure for small businesses; established in 2005)</gloss>
+<gloss>limited liability company</gloss>
@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>GK</gloss>

高度サービス	1,004

I don't think it's needed. Only one result on Reverso.

came across here
https://kotobank.jp/word/合同会社-3301#goog_rewarded
創業の活発化、情報・金融・高度サービス産業の振興、共同研究開発・産学連携の促進等を図るため

so not comp? but is it worth keeping?

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>

Entry created

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 哺乳綱 │ 2,743 │ 91.3% │
│ ほ乳綱 │   263 │  8.7% │
╰─ーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ほ乳綱</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1565260">哺乳類・ほにゅうるい</xref>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/哺乳類

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/つづけ字

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────╮
│ つづけ字 │ 1,060 │
│ 続け字　 │   825 │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────╯

I think the margin is small enough that we can lead with the 続け form.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>つづけ字</keb>

Daijr, GG5, ルミナス

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>letters written in a running hand</gloss>
+<gloss>cursive handwriting</gloss>
+<gloss>connected characters</gloss>
+<gloss>running characters</gloss>

http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/je2/50212/m0u/続け字/

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>item sold as is</gloss>
+<gloss>item sold as-is</gloss>

ngrams
ジャンク品	110009
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ジャン�
%82%AF%E5%93%81
http://page11.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/n139179287
"体が認識したりしなかったりと不安定ですのでジャンク品でお願いします。"

Aligning

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -13 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>food reportage (on TV)</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>food review (on TV, social media, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>food reportage</gloss>

Used but not as common as 食レポ.

https://buraburayamaguchi.com/348/syokuzi/

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 哺乳器 │ 7,129 │ 87.2% │
│ ほ乳器 │ 1,043 │ 12.8% │
╰─ーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ほ乳器</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版

哺乳器	7129

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────┬───────╮
│ 哺乳児 │ 173 │ 67.8% │
│ ほ乳児 │  82 │ 32.2% │
╰─ーーー─┴─────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ほ乳児</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

G n-grams: 173

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>infant</gloss>
+<gloss>infant at the breast</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; 三省堂　スーパー大辞林

jawiki

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>syntax sugar</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/糖衣構文

Not sure which is more common. Google hits are similar.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2860290">糖衣構文</xref>

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntactic_sugar
シンタックスシュガー	784

Looks good.

Nothing to do with pornography.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>inspiration porn</gloss>
+<gloss>inspiration porn (portrayal of people with disabilities as being inspirational to able-bodied people)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inspiration_porn

A bit hard to have a more explanatory gloss.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/感動ポルノ

I've seen 感ポル several times, but seems not common

GG5, 中辞典

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&bus;</field>

daijr

used by amazon
一回払い	35898

cf

一括払い	703619

more commonly as xref

gg5; prog

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>...</gloss>
+<gloss>recycling fee</gloss>

リサイクル料金	232522	99.9%
再商品化料金	279	0.1%
both in daijr

daijr and koj also mention usage for summer retreats, so better kept general.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>mountain hut (for mountaineers)</gloss>
+<gloss>mountain hut</gloss>
+<gloss>mountain lodge</gloss>

gg5 daijr

Seems uncontroversial. I'll close it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mochibun_kaisha
もちぶんがいしゃ	24
もちぶんかいしゃ	0

Since we are glossing 合同会社 as "gōdō gaisha", we may as well do something like that here. I'll lock this in and reopen for possible discussion.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>membership company</gloss>
+<gloss>mochibun gaisha</gloss>

"Membership company" doesn't really mean anything in English business terminology. I think it needs a bit more to be a useful entry.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&bus;</field>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">company structure which functions like a partnership</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬────────╮
│ 持分会社　　　　 │ 33,900 │
│ 持ち分会社　　　 │    103 │
│ もちぶんがいしゃ │     24 │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴────────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>持ち分会社</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>foreign cemetery</gloss>
+<gloss>foreign cemetery (in Japan)</gloss>

gg5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_cemeteries_in_Japan


外国人墓地	7419	27.3%
外人墓地	19782	72.7%

https://medium.com/@retronator/the-3-4-view-in-that-image-doesnt-have-any-foreshortening-on-the-y-and-z-axes-which-makes-it-d47082643982

Thanks. Daijisen did not get that technical, but you're right that the results consistently show an isometric view, which a 3/4 view might not be.

https://www.wdic.org/w/MOE/クォータービュー

also in this link above, it says "本来の英語の意味からはかけ離れている"

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/67/3D_shapes_in_isometric_projection.svg/1024px-3D_shapes_in_isometric_projection.svg.png
https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/alttp_three_quarters.png
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/569fba_fb1a59b4baf447c89493fbac5a1dbe0e~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_358,h_314,al_c,lg_1,q_85/569fba_fb1a59b4baf447c89493fbac5a1dbe0e~mv2.png

I have some doubts on the "three-quarter view" definition - the reason being that searching through google image "クォータービュー" gives widely different results than what you get with "three-quarter view" or "three-quarter view games". 
The definition for "isometric view" is: "It is an axonometric projection in which the three coordinate axes appear equally foreshortened and the angle between any two of them is 120 degrees. " and this is easily noticeable in the first link above, also these are the results for an image search for "クォータービュー"
On the other hand, "three-quarter view" is used in the context of art/painting in which it means an in-between of front and side view, and in the context of videogames with a search for "three-quarter view games" brings up results such as "legend of zelda: a link to the past" (second link above) and "final fantasy 6" (third link above), which like for the meaning of three-quarter in art, show only 2 sides of things (in this case front and top) instead of the three sides like the isometric view does.
In short, googling "クォータービュー" doesn't bring up "three-quarter view" results so I think that's not accurate

@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>three-quarter view</gloss>

* daijs: https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/クオータービュー/
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-quarter_view - three-quarter perspective (2.5D) in video games

クォータービュー 4,363 74.2%
クオータービュー 1,237 21.0% <- daijs
クォータビュー　   284  4.8%
クオータビュー　     0  0.0%

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>クォータービュー</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +7,17 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クオータービュー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クォーター・ビュー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クオーター・ビュー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クォータビュー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クオータビュー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +26 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">quarter view</lsource>
@@ -12,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>three-quarter view</gloss>

https://www.wdic.org/w/MOE/クォータービュー

this can easily be seen with a google image search, this link above also confirms it

KM n-grams (better parsing)
被験	22452	  (被験)
被験者	20625	  (被験_者)
被験体	595	  (被験_体)
被験物質	553	  (被験_物質)
被験薬	186	  (被験_薬)
Unidic (tags it as a noun)

Barely exists apart form being a prefix.

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>trial...</gloss>
-<gloss>test...</gloss>
+<gloss>trial</gloss>
+<gloss>test</gloss>

https://www.jikken-baito.com/
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=被験
https://www.edrdg.org/jmwsgi/entr.py?svc=jmdict&sid=&q=1484390
https://www.edrdg.org/jmwsgi/entr.py?svc=jmdict&sid=&q=2671250

Could be [n], but a web search suggests it is only/mainly used as [pref] in compounds

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>being eqivalent</gloss>
+<gloss>being equivalent</gloss>

Nikk: うまく周囲の状況に合わせてゆくこと。また、うまくあてはまること。
Reverso
応当	13741

I think that's a bit stretched.

@@ -11,6 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<gloss>a matter of course</gloss>
-<gloss>what is to be expected</gloss>
-<gloss>par for the course</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
@@ -20,8 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>corresponding to</gloss>
-<gloss>being applicable to</gloss>
-<gloss>being relevant to</gloss>
-<gloss>coming under</gloss>
-<gloss>falling under</gloss>
-<gloss>fulfilling (requirements)</gloss>
-<gloss>meeting (conditions)</gloss>
-<gloss>qualifying for</gloss>
+<gloss>corresponding (to)</gloss>
+<gloss>being eqivalent</gloss>
+<gloss>being relevant (to)</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/応当-2014457

Saw it at work. Aligned with 当然のこと and 該当.

DAIJR

more commonly as xref

We already have that on the アクリル entry.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1015470">アクリル</xref>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="ger">acryl</lsource>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="ger">acryl</lsource>

I agree. アクリル is from German.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>acryl gouache</gloss>

https://www.turner.co.jp/english/acrylgouache/

I don't think "acryl" is English. Web hits for "acryl gouache" surface Turner branded paints, which is a Japanese company.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&art;</field>

Iwakoku also describes the containers as being 四角

Fair enough.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>dried cakes of water paint (used in Japanese-style paintings)</gloss>
+<gloss>dried rectangular cakes of water paint (used in Japanese-style paintings)</gloss>

Seems they are specifically rectangular though, circular ones are called something else (see the musabi link).

We don't have 日本画 glossed as "nihon-ga." Maybe better to avoid it.

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>dried cakes of water paint (used in nihon-ga)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1464460">日本画</xref>
+<gloss>dried cakes of water paint (used in Japanese-style paintings)</gloss>

KOD: がんさい3【岩彩･顔彩】 (natural) mineral pigments.
岩彩	1726	13.7%
顔彩	10893	86.3%

Could mention it's pigment combined with starch or glue, but probably not nedessary.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>岩彩</keb>
@@ -12 +15 @@
-<gloss>rectangular dried cake of water paint (used in nihon-ga)</gloss>
+<gloss>dried cakes of water paint (used in nihon-ga)</gloss>

指触乾燥	1466

koj 7e as well

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, RP, eij

Quiet.

再商品化	64424
KOD

gg5

Not a proper noun