GG5, 中辞典, etc. Koj, Daijr/s

Better as two senses, as in the kokugos.

@@ -16 +16,5 @@
-<gloss>hills</gloss>
+<gloss>hill</gloss>
+<gloss>hillock</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

新明解国語辞典 第五版:
平地の周縁や山地の入口に位置し、似たような起伏が帯状に続いた、やや高い土地。

goo:
１ 小さな山。おか。
２ ゆるやかな起伏の低い山が続く地形。「―地帯」

goo [2] is very close to "rolling hills".
新明解 mentions "山地の入口に位置し", i.e. foothills.
These two terms will give learners a better image of the type of terrain the word refers to. 
"Hills" might should be pluralized as the word doesn't seem to refer to one single solitary hill in a vacuum (say, in the middle of a flat plain).

@@ -16 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>hill</gloss>
+<gloss>hills</gloss>
+<gloss>rolling hills</gloss>
+<gloss>foothills</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>outstanding person</gloss>
+<gloss>distinguished person</gloss>

GG5: 	a hero; a great man; a master spirit.

Not really fussed, but I don't think the order needed changing.

"heros" with 傑  (none of these actually mean 　ヒーロー・英雄)
豪傑	65836	51.6%  hero; great man
英傑	51297	40.2%  great person; hero; mastermind; extraordinary person
英雄豪傑	4830	3.8%   hero; warrior of matchless valor; heroic character
俊傑	4152	3.3%   hero; genius
傑人	2511		outstanding person
人傑	1153	0.9%   great person; outstanding talent; hero
傑士	288	0.2% <--- this one

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/thsrs/4708/meaning/m0u/#:~:text=なみはずれてすぐれた人物。
傑物／傑士／傑人／人傑／英傑／俊傑 の共通する意味
なみはずれてすぐれた人物。
英語表現 a great man
国語辞書で調べる 傑物 傑士 傑人 人傑 英傑 俊傑

There's an interesting assertion here that 傑士／傑人／人傑／英傑／俊傑 are all mostly interchangeable (and all [form], though 傑士 is [rare] even among them).
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/thsrs/4704/meaning/m0u/
傑物／傑士／傑人／人傑／英傑／俊傑 の使い分け
１「傑物」以外は文章語で、意味に大差はない。
２「傑物」は、一般の人の基準では推し量れない型破りの人物に対する驚嘆の念を伴っていうこともある。

Looking at reverso, the most-likely-to-be-glossed as "hero" among all of these is 英傑, and we've already made "hero" the second gloss there:
英傑: great person; hero; mastermind; extraordinary person

So, minimally, I think moving "hero" to the second position here is reasonable. It seems like "hero" only applies here in the limited sense that it is a synonym for "a great man". I don't think it would be a loss to drop "hero" entirely on this term, and a number of the related terms(傑人, 人傑, probably 俊傑 ), as it seems more misleading than whatever value it contributes as a potential gloss.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>great man</gloss>
@@ -13 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>great man</gloss>

meikyo, daij

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>
@@ -12,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>distinguished person</gloss>
+<gloss>person of high caliber</gloss>

Fixed. (Missed this week's update cycle.)

The sentence currently on sense [4] should be on sense[3].

彼女は入試を控えて神経質になっていた。
She was nervous before the entrance exam.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 控える　 │ 566,954 │ 96.7% │
│ 扣える　 │       0 │  0.0% │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s, koj, shinmeikai)
│ ひかえる │  19,047 │  3.3% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5, daij

〘接尾〙in koj and smk.
For "along the coast", 沿い is much more common.
freq tags were accidentally dropped in 2017. Adding them back in.

@@ -5,0 +6,2 @@
+<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>nf40</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +11,2 @@
+<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
+<re_pri>nf40</re_pri>
@@ -11 +15 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
@@ -13,2 +17,2 @@
-<s_inf>often 伝いに</s_inf>
-<gloss>along (wall, coast, river, etc.)</gloss>
+<s_inf>after a noun; oft. 〜に</s_inf>
+<gloss>along (a wall, river, railroad tracks, etc.)</gloss>

I mistakenly added [adj-no] in my 2017 edit.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1441850">伝う</xref>

G n-grams:
伝い	143441
づたい	1286
伝いに	47616
づたいに	26023

The JE examples are all 伝いに.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<s_inf>often 伝いに</s_inf>

daijr, daijs

It makes more sense to me having it in this form.

@@ -5,3 +5 @@
-<keb>伝いに</keb>
-<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf40</ke_pri>
+<keb>伝い</keb>
@@ -10,3 +8 @@
-<reb>づたいに</reb>
-<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf40</re_pri>
+<reb>づたい</reb>
@@ -16 +12 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>alongside</gloss>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<re_nokanji/>

やつは	1595354
ヤツは	648303

やつら	925991
ヤツら	185473

Was reading as government publication on discriminatory vocabulary that wrote it this way. Was surprised a search for "ヤツ" didn't return anything.

@@ -14,0 +15,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヤツ</reb>

It's one or the other, and having both tags would be a bit odd.

isn't tagging these senses [derog][fam] preferable to a note reading "derogatory or familiar"?
(and in line with what we usually do?)

GG5: a vagabond; a gentleman of the road; a homeless person; a vagrant; a tramp; a bum; 《米》a hobo; a jobless, homeless person. 
(Other JEs similar),

It's just one sense. Also, a [sens] tag has to refer to the Japanese term; not one English sense.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<misc>&dated;</misc>
+<s_inf>now deprecated</s_inf>
@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>tramp</gloss>
@@ -23,4 +23,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&sens;</misc>
@@ -29 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>tramp</gloss>

ホームレス	674228	86.9%
浮浪者	101216	13.1%

Disfavored due to discrimination:
浮浪者とホームレスの意味は何の違いますか?
https://ja.hinative.com/questions/6516070
同じですが浮浪者は差別用語的なのでホームレスという言葉が使われるようになったのだと思います。

Disfavored due to discrimination:
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1475811244
同じ意味です。
昔は浮浪者って言っていたのですよ。「浮浪者」という言葉が差別的であるとして放送禁止用語とされたことにより、「ホームレス」という単語で呼び替えられることが多くなったんです。

Disfavored due to discrimination:
https://two-differences.com/homuresu/
今はあまり「乞食」や「浮浪者」という言葉は使われなくなり、家を失い路上生活などをしている人のことをまとめて「ホームレス」と呼ぶことが多くなりました。

Steam浮浪者生活シム『Bum Simulator』
https://automaton-media.com/articles/newsjp/20230513-247298/

hobo, drifter, homeless guy, vagrant, homeless,
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/浮浪者

https://www.wordreference.com/jaen/浮浪者
Listed as an option under:
bum, dosser, drifter, hobo, outcast, tramp

Same resource from 看護師, discriminatory words-to-avoid
https://www.city.takarazuka.hyogo.jp/_res/projects/default_project/_page_/001/021/755/sassi19.pdf
● 職業に関する用語 屠殺場・バタ屋・人夫・土方・小使・女中・女工・浮浪者・賤民・ボロ屋・保母・看護婦
 くずや・養老院・スチュワ－デス・チェアマン・オンブズマン

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/bum
研究社 新英和中辞典での「bum」の意味
bum１
1a可算名詞 浮浪者，ルンペン; 怠け者，ぐうたら.

日本語WordNet(英和)での「bum」の意味
働かない人
(person who does no work)
a lazy bum 怠惰な浮浪者

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/ja/dictionary/japanese-english/浮浪者
浮浪者 noun (ふろうしゃ)
一定の住居や職業を持たずに方々をうろつく人
homeless person
hobo [noun] (American) a tramp
vagrant [noun] a person who has no fixed home; a tramp.

Looks like a word that is becoming/has become disfavored over time.  This term is currently [news2], but I doubt it would be if stats were collected today.

This term is *mentioned* in sankoku under 浮浪 in this way:
【[ー者]今は「ホームレス」】
it does not get its own entry.

I won't be surprised if my edit is squished back into one sense, but mixing the glosses together gives no guidance for non-English-natives. If you are reading old texts, even government publications used 浮浪者 in designating homeless people. This use is [dated]. Use ホームレス instead.  But 浮浪者 is obviously still quite common.

Google for: site:mainichi.jp "浮浪者" , 20 results returned, generally of a historical nature
Google for: site:mainichi.jp "ホームレス" , endless stream of results

One of the uses of 浮浪者 in mainichi.jp, for example, was discussing the two "vagrants" from "Waiting for Godot". 

Like 看護婦, "deprecated" is maybe the right idea.  You'll obviously see this term all over the place even today (especially since the homeless command no degree of respect, unlike nurses).  But foreigners should probably be advised to avoid it and use ホームレス instead.

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2105700">ホームレス・2</xref>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
@@ -19,0 +22,7 @@
+<gloss>homeless person</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&sens;</misc>
+<gloss>hobo</gloss>
+<gloss>bum</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>vagabond</gloss>
+<gloss>tramp</gloss>

daij, smk, prog, luminous
川沿い	645,311	99.6%	
川添い	2,688	0.4%	
海岸沿い	216,491	99.8%	
海岸添い	389	0.2%

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>添い</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>along</gloss>
+<s_inf>after a noun; usu. 〜に</s_inf>
+<gloss>along (a river, coast, railway, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>on (e.g. a street)</gloss>

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1624620">風波・1</xref>

sanoku:[文]風波

風波	34316	79.4%
風浪	8896	20.6%

https://kotobank.jp/word/風浪-123037
風浪
ふうろう
wind wave

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_wave

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/波
。風によって起きる波を風浪（ふうろう）と呼ぶ
風浪
その場で吹いている風によって引き起こされた波は風浪あるいは風波（ふうは、（かざなみ）と呼ばれる

daijs:
１ 風と波。
２ 水面を吹く風によって起こる波。さざ波・三角波など。風波。

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=風浪
風浪
wave
wind wave《気象》

"In fluid dynamics, a wind wave, or wind-generated water wave, is a surface wave that occurs on the free surface of bodies of water as a result of the wind blowing over the water's surface."

[2] is a wave that is developed by the wind. Distinct from [1].  風波 may also merit this gloss, but 風浪 seems to be the more common term for "wind wave". 

also, pluralized "waves", follows the xref.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>wind and wave</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1624620">風波・1</xref>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<gloss>wind and waves</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +17,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>wind wave</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, daij

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>heroine</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +17,3 @@
+<gloss>spirited woman</gloss>
+<gloss>woman of strong character</gloss>
+<gloss>Amazon</gloss>

gg5, daijr/s
飛び石伝い	1,552
飛び石伝いに	1,306

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>crossing via stepping stones</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. adverbially as 〜に</s_inf>
+<gloss>walking over stepping stones</gloss>
+<gloss>following the stepping stones</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 飛び石伝い │ 1,552 │ 92.2% │
│ 飛石伝い　 │   131 │  7.8% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>飛石伝い</keb>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>crossing via stepping-stones</gloss>
+<gloss>crossing via stepping stones</gloss>

〈道／みち〉を〈聞／訊／聴／き〉い

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 道を聞い　 │ 29,308 │ 92.8% │ - moving up
│ 道を訊い　 │    972 │  3.1% │
│ 道をきい　 │    945 │  3.0% │ - add, sK
│ 道を聴い　 │    194 │  0.6% │
│ みちを訊い │      0 │  0.0% │
│ みちを聞い │      0 │  0.0% │
│ みちを聴い │      0 │  0.0% │
│ みちをきい │    156 │  0.5% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

English N-gram Counts
ask for directions  46,917
ask the way          3,959

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>道を聞く</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11,2 @@
-<keb>道を聞く</keb>
+<keb>道をきく</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>to ask for directions</gloss>

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>

I agree. 拝謁を賜る could be added, but it's rather obvious.

I don't think this is needed. Rare and the meaning is obvious.

https://reibuncnt.jp/26944

https://sakura-paris.org/dict/学研国語大辞典/content/881_1718
えつをたまわる【謁を賜る】

謁を賜る	0	0.0%
謁を賜わる	0	0.0%
拝謁を賜る	750	87.9%
拝謁を賜わる	0	0.0%
謁見を賜る	103	12.1%
謁見を賜わる	0	0.0%

Our bare entry for 賜る also prefers the orthography without わ。 Both show up in books, and it's not actually a huge gap there.

謁見を賜る and 拝謁を賜る are both far more common, but it's nice to see the verb in any case.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>謁を賜る</keb>
+</k_ele>

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

ヤツ等  9703

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ヤツ等</keb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 奴ら　 │ 1,248,442 │ 47.0% │
│ 奴等　 │   280,930 │ 10.6% │
│ やつ等 │    14,876 │  0.6% │ - sK
│ やつら │   925,991 │ 34.9% │
│ ヤツら │   185,473 │  7.0% │ - sk
╰─ーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19,0 +21 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

やつら	925991
ヤツら	185473

@@ -16,0 +17,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヤツら</reb>

mk 複数の人を卑しめていう語。

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
+<misc>&fam;</misc>

OK

I think that from a data perspective there should be an lsrc if the first gloss doesn't correspond to the Japanese word

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">pick up</lsource>

gg5, prog
daijs:「送迎バスで園児を―する」
wisdom: あした10時にピックアップしてくれますか  Pick me up at 10 tomorrow, will you?

Added sense.
I don't think we need to tag this as wasei.

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">pick up</lsource>
-<gloss>choice</gloss>
+<gloss>picking out</gloss>
+<gloss>choosing</gloss>
@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>picking out (from a larger list)</gloss>
@@ -21,2 +20,8 @@
-<gloss>pickup (phonograph)</gloss>
-<gloss>stylus bar</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>picking (someone) up (in a vehicle)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>pickup (in a record player)</gloss>
+<gloss>(phono) cartridge</gloss>
@@ -27,2 +32 @@
-<gloss>pickup truck</gloss>
-<gloss>pickup</gloss>
+<gloss>pickup (truck)</gloss>

I suspect there:ll be no response. Closing.

Yes, the n-grams (26) and the few WWW hits seem to be false positives.

Top 10 N-grams Lookup for 別婚 (Frequency Order)
別婚姻	271	  
別婚姻件数	214	  
別婚姻件数の	53	  

This is part of strings like ("number of marriages separated by..."):
年次別婚姻件数
都道府県別婚姻件数

Got here by chance searching "offing".  I had to look up "in the offing". I would rewrite with something more widely understood. "in anticipation of divorce", "with divorce likely".  *except*, I'm not sure this is a word at all.

Is there kokugo support?  This seems like a very specific gloss for a barely-existent term.

The way 別 gets next to 婚 is in strings like in the refs, and like:
シチュエーション別婚活方法
職業別婚活ガイド
年代別の婚活 / 年代別婚活
趣味別の婚活/ 趣味別婚活 ("searching for a marriage partner based on your hobbies", I think)

For example: 「趣味別婚活」の成功率が高い理由
https://www.itmedia.co.jp/makoto/articles/1402/04/news011_3.html

There is a book titled 別婚夫 on amazon, with the tagline:
結婚の持つ脆さ。愛を確信した女と男の信念の強さ。互いに外に愛人を持つ夫と妻。さまざまに揺れ動く男と女の心と性を精緻に描き、結婚は、夫婦の絆とは何かを探った小説。

That doesn't seem to confirm this gloss...

Otherwise, a search for usage is basically fruitless. 

別居, separate homes, is "separation", 別居婚 is "commuter marriage".  別婚 seems just as likely to be short for that as anything else.  I don't see how we would verify a meaning. 

At least two of the (few) google book results that seem to have 別婚 are actually misinterpreted instances of 別嬪(べっぴん).  I found one in a  reference book, and another in a novel here:
https://books.google.co.jp/books?id=4fBfAQAAQBAJ&pg=PT1285&lpg=PT1285&dq="別婚です""&source=bl&ots=PI5gpdtapJ&sig=ACfU3U36_9wUpO8tcRGiypICT5vO9hjXHQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjFppC6_5yBAxUrgVYBHRZzB7sQ6AF6BAgOEAM#v=onepage&q="別婚です""&f=false

Entry created

Parallel translation:

設計沖波の見直しとその手法に関する福島県の事例について
Case Study of Fukushima with Regard to the Review of Design Offshore Waves and its Method 
http://www.jific.or.jp/dispatch/ronbun/pdf_r30/3005.pdf

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_destroyer_Okinami
Okinami (沖波, "High Seas Waves") was a Yūgumo-class destroyer of the Imperial Japanese Navy.

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=沖波
沖波
offshore wave

offing: "the part of the deep sea seen from the shore"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizon
On Earth, when looking at a sea from a shore, the part of the sea closest to the horizon is called the offing.[1]

We already removed "offing" from 沖合, where it might have been appropriate(eijiro knows about it, but glosses extensively as "offshore").

I think we're better off without it here as well.

Technical texts in google book results that use "offing wave" seem to invariably have Japanese authors, suggesting that they might have relied on this vary gloss.  

The concept doesn't really make sense.  What is a wave "where the ocean meets the horizon". 

There is an English book called "Waves of the Sea and Other Water Waves", but the collocation is an accident:
"When, on the other hand, the wind is offshore, with a rough see in the offing, waves do not break until they come quite close to the beach."

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>offing wave</gloss>
+<gloss>offshore wave</gloss>

koj, daijr

えんちょう comes from the unabridged version of nikk. It's not in the other kokugos. I think we can drop it.

@@ -15,6 +14,0 @@
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>えんちょう</reb>
-<re_restr>円塚</re_restr>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

daijs
https://kotobank.jp/word/円塚-636271
まる‐づか【円塚／丸塚】
「円墳えんぷん」に同じ。

円墳	29766	87.7%
丸塚	4084	12.0%
円塚	106	0.3%

丸塚 is a place name which inflates the ngrams. Google image search for "丸塚"returns high school sports teams.

@@ -23,0 +24,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1176170">円墳</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

I don't think the x-ref is helpful.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1253840">傑作・1</xref>

GG5: a work of the highest quality; a masterpiece; a masterwork; one's magnum opus.

Having a solitary plural gloss sitting in the middle of singular ones looks very odd, Anyway, I doubt it's actually needed; the other five are quite sufficient.
Also, we are fairly wary of quoting verbatim from Eijiro - see the Editorial Policy.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>greatest works</gloss>

I do see that we don't usually do (s).  This situation seems exceptional to me, I just don't know how to address it.

Suggestion #2: just make "greatest works" plural (also a deviation from our style, but it is sometimes done in mostly-plural cases).  Eijiro even does this:
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=最高傑作
crowning work
greatest works
magnum opus

The issue here remains that "highest", "crowning", "greatest", "magnum opus" all strongly imply that this is singular. (and masterpiece and masterwork, while not strictly defined as singular, are quite compatible with this interpretation). 　最高 also seems like it could be "the absolute best". 

That makes the whole entry misleading. If you were seeing this in a J->E context, you could easily be lead to believe "there must be only one thing", when 最高傑作 does not have this limitation, and is quite often plural/uncountable.

I assumed it was the #1 best thing, until I went searching for examples and discovered it was not.  That's what I wanted to address for other dictionary users.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>greatest work</gloss>
+<gloss>greatest works</gloss>

We don't usually do "(s)" endings.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>greatest work(s)</gloss>
+<gloss>greatest work</gloss>

One of...
傑作の一つ	14858
最高傑作の一つ	6851

https://tr-ex.me/翻訳/日本語-英語/傑作
最高傑作は
-masterpiece
the perfect album
the best works
finest work

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=最高傑作
greatest works
(among others)

Google returns some nice examples when simply searching
最高傑作 "greatest masterpieces"

I would personally do this:
(greatest) masterpiece(s)
But I feel like this will be too ugly to be accepted.

xref in an attempt to make it clear that you might be saying more than you mean to with "最高傑作". "傑作" is already legitimately "a masterpiece".  This entry is "among their greatest masterpieces", or something like that.

The selection of glosses here, along with 最高, give the strong impression that only one work applies.  But ngrams for "最高傑作の一つ" give away that this is not necessarily the case.  

In the structure "one of their "..., none if the existing glosses seemed to me to apply.  "One of their finest works" seems most natural to me, "one of their best/greatest works", one of their greatest masterpieces... 

"best" (or "greatest") seems more appropriate here than it did in "傑作"  If you search "傑作" and "best work", the results will tend toward "最高傑作". 

masterwork can legitimately go with 傑作 alone. That said, "masterpiece" seems like the most common gloss for 傑作 or for  最高傑作, so I've moved it up.

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1253840">傑作・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1253840">傑作・1</xref>
+<gloss>masterpiece</gloss>
@@ -13 +16 @@
-<gloss>masterpiece</gloss>
+<gloss>greatest work(s)</gloss>

Appears to be archaic.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

墓	2889046	90.0%
墓所	147938	4.6%
墳塋	100	0.0%  <-------------

And some other 墳 terms for comparison
墳墓	69446	2.2%
墳丘	47649	1.5%
円墳	29766	0.9%
方墳	15100	0.5%
墳丘墓	10453	0.3%
上円下方墳	1195	0.0%
八角墳	820	0.0%
土墳	153	0.0% 

https://kotobank.jp/word/墳塋-377144

nikk definition is 墓・墓所.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

daijr, koj

Aligning.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>audience with a person of high rank</gloss>
+<gloss>audience with someone of high rank</gloss>

拝謁	23443	98.5%
面謁	360	1.5%

https://kotobank.jp/word/面謁-644511#:~:text=めん‐えつ【面謁】,拝謁。
〘名〙 貴人に会うこと。お目にかかること。拝謁。おめみえ。

daijs:
［名］(スル)貴人に会うこと。お目にかかること。拝謁。「国王に面謁する」

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1472240">拝謁</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/面謁

I don't think that xref helps.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1433620">塚・2</xref>

Various burial mounds:

古墳	1069967	91.3%
高塚	69585	5.9%
円墳	29766	2.5%
土饅頭	2862	0.2%
土墳	153	0.0% <---------- this one

daijs:
土を小高く盛り上げた墓。塚。

A kohun is a particular kind of ancient burial mound.  I don't think this has to be ancient.  The kokugos reference more generic terms instead (土饅頭, 塚)

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1266100">古墳</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1433620">塚・2</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

more commonly as xref

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1266100">古墳</xref>

koj daijs nikk gakkoku too

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>tumulus</gloss>

daijr

土墳	153

Shinmeikai uses this in its entry for 「古墳」.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>UPF</gloss>

https://rnnnews.jp/search/result/?q=ultra-processed+food&m=3

https://www.asahi.com/sp/articles/SDI201907092404.html (2019/7)
「超加工食品」とはなにか　がんや肥満とも関連？
https://wedge.ismedia.jp/articles/-/15924 (2019/4)
“危ない超加工食品”を鵜呑みにしてはいけない
https://toyokeizai.net/articles/-/501204 (2 days ago)
安全な食品とそうでない食品を見分ける重要な鍵
あなたは｢超加工食品｣の存在を知っていますか

Looks OK. The whole topic makes me feel tired.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/俺TUEEE

I tried to come up with glosses for this a few days ago but I just felt lost. The explanations are all over the place.
I don't think "in a wish-fulfillment story" is necessarily true.
What's the source for "male"? Wiktionary has "Mary Sue (without a gender connotation)".
I'm not sure why sense 2 is adj-f. Niconicopedia defines it as a noun and Wiktionary glosses it as a noun.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>俺TUEEE</keb>
+<keb>俺ＴＵＥＥＥ</keb>
@@ -12,3 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2837549">なろう系</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2837549">なろう系</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2837549">なろう系</xref>
@@ -16 +13 @@
-<gloss>male "Mary Sue" protagonist in a wish-fulfillment story</gloss>
+<gloss>"Mary Sue" protagonist (inexplicably strong or capable character)</gloss>
@@ -19 +16 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -21 +18 @@
-<gloss>overpowered (e.g. in a video game)</gloss>
+<gloss>overpowering weaker opponents for self-satisfaction (in a video game)</gloss>

I'm comfortable with sense 1. Not so sure about sense 2, but to be frank these slangy entries can be rather vague, and it's probably better to have something than nothing at all.

Maybe this shouldn't be an entry if the editors aren't sure of the meaning.

If the "overpowered" meaning is valid, I think it's another sense. I haven't dug into it very far - not my field.

I can't see how it would be implied here. But I think I was wrong to assume that a single ラーケーション can consist of multiple days. It seems more likely that each day would be considered a separate ラーケーション.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>optional day(s) off school spent doing learning activities with a parent or guardian</gloss>
+<gloss>optional day off school spent doing learning activities with a parent or guardian</gloss>

I thought plural was implied and that the dictionary doesnt add (s) to nouns.

OK

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20230824/k10014170231000.html
1日ずつ取ることも3日連続で取ることも可能です

Not necessarily a single day.
ラーケイション gets very few hits.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -12,2 +13,2 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">lear(n)cation</lsource>
-<gloss>day off from school spent studying or learning with a parent or legal guardian</gloss>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">lear(ning) (va)cation</lsource>
+<gloss>optional day(s) off school spent doing learning activities with a parent or guardian</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">learncation</lsource>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">lear(n)cation</lsource>

看護短期大学	6902

This is not a specific place; it's a general term. A bit A+B but may be worth an entry.

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>5190330</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
@@ -9 +7,0 @@
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -12,2 +10,2 @@
-<misc>&organization;</misc>
-<gloss>Kango Junior College</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>nursing college</gloss>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Educ. inst. correction
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>
+<misc>&organization;</misc>

看護短大	5717

Not a specific place. May be worth moving to JMdict.

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>5190331</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
@@ -11,2 +10,4 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>
-<gloss>Kangotandai</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2858743">看護短期大学</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>nursing college</gloss>

I thought we were including them if they were in sites like yoji-jitenon. Not fussed as it very rare.

I thought we agreed not to add any more rare yojijukugo that aren't in the major refs.

Typo

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>living a nobly without greed, even in a life of poverty</gloss>
+<gloss>living nobly without greed, even in a life of poverty</gloss>

https://yoji.jitenon.jp/yojid/1838.html
https://idiom-encyclopedia.com/soushinnnokasei/

Rare, but many yoji are.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>A parable of being noble and not bound by self-interest even though you are poor.</gloss>
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>
+<gloss>living a nobly without greed, even in a life of poverty</gloss>

G n-grams: No matches

Not in my refs. I don't think this is needed.

Duplicate

http://tuuhanichiban.so.land.to/3768.html among others.

Marked as 四字熟語 on page above.

daijr/s, KOD追加語彙

gg5, chujiten, luminous, daij, koj

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<misc>&product;</misc>
-<gloss>NHK educational portal</gloss>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>
+<gloss>NHK Educational TV</gloss>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>KDDI (Japanese telecommunications company)</gloss>
+<gloss>KDDI (telecommunications company)</gloss>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

I think アノニマスさん hadn't realized the role of the [spec1] tag here.

Daijr/s, koj, and nikk have this entry, so I'd say it's worth including

I think the commenter's is saying that if this entry's inclusion is based on n-grams, the count is inflated due to コップ's much more common "cup" meaning.

https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/94

No, in the names dictionary it's used to flag entries that are added to the JMdict XML distribution.

Thr Spec1 is likely wrong here if it's based on the reading

OK

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TurboGrafx-16
"The TurboGrafx-16, known as the PC Engine outside North America, is a home video game console designed by Hudson Soft and sold by NEC Home Electronics."

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>TurboGrafx-16</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>(NEC) PC Engine (equiv: Turbografx 16)</gloss>
+<gloss>(NEC) PC Engine</gloss>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>au (Japanese mobile phone brand)</gloss>
+<gloss>au (mobile phone operator)</gloss>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<misc>&product;</misc>
-<gloss>i-mode (mobile internet service run by NTT DoCoMo in Japan)</gloss>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>
+<gloss>i-mode (mobile internet service run by NTT DoCoMo)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-mode

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>mobile internet service run by NTT DoCoMo in Japan</gloss>
+<gloss>i-mode (mobile internet service run by NTT DoCoMo in Japan)</gloss>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/ミクシィ

I'll correct it.

We also have this in jmdict with the reading 「ミクシ」.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>mixi (social networking sevice)</gloss>
+<gloss>mixi (social networking service)</gloss>

Then [company] is sufficient.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<misc>&serv;</misc>
-<gloss>mixi (social networking site)</gloss>
+<misc>&company;</misc>
+<gloss>mixi (social networking sevice)</gloss>

"Shouldnt be both" - but it is...

Shouldn't be both.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&company;</misc>

Not a specific place. Already in JMdict.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>GU (Japanese clothing retailer)</gloss>
+<gloss>GU (clothing retailer)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ジーユー

A bit more.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>GU (retailer)</gloss>
+<gloss>GU (Japanese clothing retailer)</gloss>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/94

It flags it for inclusion in the JMdict XML distribution.

Why is spec1 on the reading?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shōsetsuka_ni_Narō

Agreed.
I don't think we need to mention the company that runs it.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Let's Become a Novelist (novel submission site provided by the Hina Project company)</gloss>
+<gloss>Shōsetsuka ni Narō (novel self-publishing website)</gloss>

If it doesn't have an official English name, then this entry shouldn't have one either.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/小説家になろう
小説家になろう	131036

https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/94

Why spec1?

I'm not sure how useful an entry like this is. It's not a large/important company.

https://hinaproject.co.jp/