RP, daijr
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/upskill

I think "upskilling" is is more accurate.
Web results show plenty of examples of transitive and intransitive use.

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -14 +16 @@
-<gloss>reskilling</gloss>
+<gloss>upskilling</gloss>

skill up 10794

It probably was originally.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">skill-up</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">skill up</lsource>

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/skill_up

I suspect this is not wasei.

フラグ	687,621		
フラッグ	367,298		
---
フラッグを振っ	1,874		
フラグを振っ	35		
死亡フラグ	63,154		
死亡フラッグ	91		
フラグを設定	6,122		
フラッグを設定	27

I was going to merge フラッグ (1111320) with this entry but it seems there's a clear preference for one form or the other depending on the sense. Unlike the other kokugos, sankoku keeps them separate and only has the 旗 sense for フラッグ. GG5 does the same.
Instead of merging and adding restr tags or "esp." notes, it's probably best to drop the general "flag" sense from this entry.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec2</re_pri>
@@ -7,9 +7,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>flag</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
-<gloss>tag indicating a future role or status for a character in anime, games, etc. (e.g. death, love, survival)</gloss>
-</sense>
@@ -20,0 +13,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>something that foreshadows a future event or outcome (in a film, novel, etc.)</gloss>

GG5 only has sense 3.

I don't think checkbox works here.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>checkbox</gloss>

https://qiita.com/zumi_ys/items/cdb5fdf348bb7adc4452#:~:text=フラグってなに,変数に格納します。

@@ -15,0 +16,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>flag</gloss>
+<gloss>boolean value</gloss>
+<gloss>checkbox</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>tag indicating a future role or status for a character in anime, games, etc (e.g. death, love, survival)</gloss>
+<gloss>tag indicating a future role or status for a character in anime, games, etc. (e.g. death, love, survival)</gloss>

陽画	2,037		
ポジ	418,685

陽画 isn't especially common.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1546980">陽画</xref>

daij, meikyo

@@ -18 +18,4 @@
-<gloss>positive (photography)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1125030">ポジ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1546980">陽画</xref>
+<field>&photo;</field>
+<gloss>positive</gloss>
@@ -22,2 +25,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1547000">陽極・ようきょく</xref>
-<gloss>positive (electrical polarity)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1547000">陽極</xref>
+<gloss>positive (pole)</gloss>
+<gloss>anode</gloss>

Daijr: " 電気の陽極。"

@@ -19,0 +20,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1547000">陽極・ようきょく</xref>
+<gloss>positive (electrical polarity)</gloss>
+</sense>

daijr

Splitting.

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1092790">ネガティブ</xref>
+<gloss>positive (e.g. thinking)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -14,2 +18 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1092790">ネガティブ</xref>
-<gloss>positive</gloss>
+<gloss>positive (photography)</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1131170">ミドルエージ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1131170">ミドルエイジ</xref>

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1131170">ミドルエージ</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

ミドル	1459524	  
ミドルの	341445	
ルミナス, 中辞典

Yes, ルミナス has that as a separate meaning.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -10,0 +12,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>middle age</gloss>

can mean middle age ミドル女性

My bad, please reject.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1131170">ミドルエイジ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1131170">ミドルエージ</xref>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1131170">ミドルエージ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1131170">ミドルエイジ</xref>

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1131170">ミドルエージ</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

ミドルエージ	654	3.5%
ミドルエイジ	17824	96.5%

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミドルエイジ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<reb>ミドルエイジ</reb>
+<reb>ミドル・エイジ</reb>
@@ -12,3 +14,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ミドル・エイジ</reb>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -6,0 +6,9 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミドルエイジ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミドル・エージ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミドル・エイジ</reb>

I think these can be self-approved.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1546980">陽画</xref>

gg5, meikyo
陰画	4,720		
ネガ	360,174

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>(photographic) negative</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1092770">ネガ・1</xref>
+<field>&photo;</field>
+<gloss>negative</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2535360">黄金比・おうごんひ</xref>
-<gloss>golden ratio (approx. 1.6180339887)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2535360">黄金比</xref>
+<gloss>golden ratio</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>golden mean</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2535360">黄金比・おうごんひ</xref>
+<gloss>golden ratio (approx. 1.6180339887)</gloss>

Eijiro: golden section
G n-grams: 22122
http://dic.nicovideo.jp/a/黄金率 - suggestions it's like 黄金律 and 黄金比
http://www.shimizu-camera.co.jp/glossary/detail5.html

Seems legitimate. Gloss could be better.

Is there a source for this?

prog, gg5, wisdom
daijr (sense 2): 仕組んだわけではないのに，ひどく滑稽で面白みがある・こと（さま）。「―な出来事」

I think "crowning achievement" should be reserved for 最高傑作. I don't think the x-ref is needed.
In meikyo and smk, only sense 2 is adj-na. I think the glosses are a bit off. It doesn't necessary refer to a blunder.
I don't think the "sarcastically" note is needed if we're tagging it as joc.

@@ -18,2 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2829836">最高傑作</xref>
@@ -22 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>crowning achievement</gloss>
+<gloss>chef d'oeuvre</gloss>
+<gloss>fine piece of work</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -29,4 +28,4 @@
-<s_inf>sarcastically</s_inf>
-<gloss>amusing blunder</gloss>
-<gloss>funny mistake</gloss>
-<gloss>boner</gloss>
+<gloss>(unintentionally) hilarious</gloss>
+<gloss>absurd (e.g. blunder)</gloss>
+<gloss>outrageous</gloss>
+<gloss>wild</gloss>

GG5: a masterpiece; a crowning 「work [achievement]; a masterwork; a chef d'oeuvre 《pl. chefs d'oeuvre》; a magnum opus.

I think sense 1 deserves a bit more.

@@ -20 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>masterpiece(s)</gloss>
+<gloss>masterpiece</gloss>
+<gloss>masterwork</gloss>
+<gloss>crowning achievement</gloss>

傑作	3058151	  
傑作選	204246	  

definitely not adj-na usage:
傑作と	168025	  
傑作です	165294	  
傑作だ	145184

theoretically possible adj-na usage
傑作な	32824	  
minus not-actually-adj-na usage:
傑作なの	13205	  
傑作なん	5794	  
傑作など	926	
傑作なら	655	 
傑作なり	378	

actual adj-na usage:
傑作なもの	301	  
傑作なこと	286	

[2] seems dated (couldn't find real-world examples, did find a reference suggesting dated)
https://word-dictionary.jp/posts/4902
主に、ある人にハプニングが起こって皆で面白く楽しんでいる様子を表したり、ある人が滑稽な言動をして盛り上げたのを褒めたりするような意味で使います。
---->>> ただし、やや古めかしい言い方で現在はあまり使わません。

reversed [n] and [adj-na], added xref, removed "best work" (somewhat misleading, somewhat inaccurate).
added [dated] to [2] (last reference).

[adj-na] appears to actually be quite uncommon. You can google things like 傑作な作品, 傑作な歌, or 傑作な話.  They exist.  But this seems dwarfed by strict-noun usage.  Skimming briefly through yourei's 5000+ examples, I found no [adj-na] usage at all. (I only looked at a few pages)

reverso overwhelmingly prefers "masterpiece", sometimes masterpieces.  "best work" is only in a few E->J translations.  The "best" in "best work" gives a strong implication of "only one qualifies.", i.e. "the finest book he has ever written", but that is not the case.  Removing "best work" reduces this confusion.  "masterpiece" alone risks this "only one" connotation. Adding the extremely-common "最高傑作" makes it clear that "傑作" is not necessarily the artists finest work. It's just very good(another reason I dislike the "best" gloss here).  

傑作	3058438	85.5%
最高傑作	520759	14.5%  <-- that's a pretty incredible count

One of...
傑作の一つ	14858	68.4%
最高傑作の一つ	6851	31.6%

daijs:　たいへんできばえのよいこと・作品   

I wanted to drop "boner" as [dated] on our side, but it looks like the Japanese expression is probably also [dated], so marked as such.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18,3 +19,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>masterpiece</gloss>
-<gloss>best work</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2829836">最高傑作</xref>
+<gloss>masterpiece(s)</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<misc>&dated;</misc>

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&joc;</misc>

Or even "(being)".

Oxford (be obliged): be indebted or grateful

adj-na indicates that the word is a 形容動詞, not that it typically takes な. A 形容動詞 doesn't stop being adjectival when it's used predicatively. There are quite a few 形容動詞 that are rarely used attributively.
That being said, I hadn't noticed that sankoku (in contrast to the other kokugos) has 幸甚 as a noun only. Also, I might have been wrong to assume that 幸甚に is adverbial in 幸甚に存じる. Nouns can take に in 〜存じる expressions.
Noun glosses are less elegant but I think 幸甚 is in fact functioning as a noun in all the examples in the JEs and kokugos.
There's only one sense here. I don't think "obliged" is any less correct than the other glosses. It's synonymous with "grateful" within the contexts in which 幸甚 is actually used.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -15,3 +14,4 @@
-<gloss>extremely grateful</gloss>
-<gloss>much obliged</gloss>
-<gloss>very happy</gloss>
+<gloss>being extremely grateful</gloss>
+<gloss>being much obliged</gloss>
+<gloss>being very appreciative</gloss>
+<gloss>being very happy</gloss>

I like the glosses here, but I agree with Jim that placing [adj-na] at the front gives the wrong idea about usage.  I imagine the goal of [adj-na,n] is to be consistent with adjective glosses, but really the glosses do not correspond to adj-na usage. 幸甚な母親 is not "an extremely grateful mother".  "幸甚な人"　doesn't even return google OR even a single book result.

So putting [adj-na] up front is in a way even more misleading.

As part of the big picture in thinking about this, is there any way you can imagine adding similar glosses (grateful, obliged, happy) to 幸い?  They'd surely make a bigger impact there.

I still think there might be something to the idea of a dedicated [id] sense. The other problem here is that "幸甚" does not literally(or even figuratively) mean "obliged", and right now it kind-of looks like it does... Highlighting that the glosses are idiomatic might help with that.  I realize this is not something that is currently done.

幸甚	80252
幸甚な	211

My main concern with having "adj-na" prominent is that implies the use of 幸甚な, which is actually quite rare.

adj-na is correct. It's a 形容動詞 that's only used predicatively or adverbially. 
I don't think "usu. as ～です" is a helpful note, and 幸甚に存じます only accounts for a little over 10% of usage. It's difficult to explain how the word is used without cluttering the entry. I think a simple "usu. in letters" note is sufficient.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -13,4 +14,4 @@
-<s_inf>usu. as ～です, ～に存じます, etc.</s_inf>
-<gloss>(being) deeply grateful</gloss>
-<gloss>(being) much obliged</gloss>
-<gloss>(being) very pleased</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. in letters</s_inf>
+<gloss>extremely grateful</gloss>
+<gloss>much obliged</gloss>
+<gloss>very happy</gloss>

Harmless, but I don't think it adds anything that's not apparent from the other three glosses.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>without a shred of truth</gloss>

I think that's being tautologous. Something can't be partially groundless. Groundless/unfounded/baseless is quite strong.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>completely groundless (rumour, accusation, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>groundless (rumour, accusation, etc.)</gloss>

daijs

I think it's a bit stronger than that
"without basis" vs "without any basis"

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>groundless (rumour, accusation, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>completely groundless (rumour, accusation, etc.)</gloss>

根も葉もない	29,703	95.2%	
根も葉も無い	1,494	4.8%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,2 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>unfounded (e.g. rumour)</gloss>
-<gloss>groundless</gloss>
+<gloss>groundless (rumour, accusation, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>unfounded</gloss>
@@ -19 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>completely untrue</gloss>

生体解剖	11115
生体解剖をして	65
生体解剖して	144
生体解剖をした	52
生体解剖した	1133

The JEs say "生体解剖をする vivisect" but it's obviously more often just 生体解剖する

生体解剖	11115	  
生体解剖事件	3710	  
生体解剖し	1354	 <- suru
生体解剖した	1133

Can google, for example, "ゲリラを生体解剖し".  Does not appear to be [adj-no], which would have to be "vivisected"(vivisected... person? cat? body?).  生体解剖の appears in ngrams, but scrolling through book results, I see examples like 生体解剖の話 (conversations about vivisection) 生体解剖の手術 (I don't think this usage merits adj-no). Other examples from yourei (not adj-no, I don't think):
生体解剖の可能性
生体解剖の軍命令
生体解剖の実態
生体解剖の首謀者
生体解剖の詳細
生体解剖の企画者
生体解剖の検討
生体解剖の描写

Instead, "vivisected" = 生体解剖された:  
彼は生体解剖された捕虜

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

All the kokugos and JEs I checked just have the viewing.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>snow viewing gathering</gloss>
+<gloss>snow viewing</gloss>
+<gloss>snow-scene viewing</gloss>

koj

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>snow viewing</gloss>
+<gloss>snow viewing gathering</gloss>

I agree re "celibate".

GG5: celibacy; 〔男性の〕 bachelorhood; 〔女性の〕 spinsterhood.
独身の single; unmarried; celibate
中辞典: 独身の single; unmarried
ルミナス: [形] single; (未婚の) unmarried. [名] (男の独身者) bachelor; (女の) unmarried woman, spinster
独身	2234763
独身が	9773
独身を	23698
独身の	285128	  
独身で	154115	  
独身時代	146036	  
独身女性	135737	  
独身男性	111087

Re the noun/adjective issue, this is often a struggle, as the dictionary examples indicate.  The n-grams indicate that noun usage is far less common than adjectival/prenominal, so I'd be comfortable with using adjective glosses and adjusting the POS accordingly.
Re the use of "celibate", as you can see it's in several dictionaries. I think its meaning in English has drifted a bit and  probably it's best omitted now.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>bachelorhood</gloss>

Built-in Dictionaries (J-J, J-E) on Mac
Japanese intuitions

I'm from WaniKani and our user requested to add "celibate" as the meaning of 独身, referring to jisho.

However, "celibate" appears to describe someone who refrains from marriage and sexual relations (独身主義者), rather than simply indicating an unmarried status or person. We request "celibate" to be removed from the meaning.

Also, 独身 is more commonly used as an adjective (as in "single" or "unmarried"), rather than "bachelorhood." So I recommend moving "bachelorhood" as the third meaning instead of the primary meaning.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>bachelorhood</gloss>
@@ -22 +21 @@
-<gloss>celibate</gloss>
+<gloss>bachelorhood</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

日帝時代	13151

Reasonable n-grams.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/日本統治時代の朝鮮#呼称

I don't think this is used in Japan. Web results are all translations from Korean sources.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>era of Japanese imperialism (esp. Korea)</gloss>
+<s_inf>term used in Korea</s_inf>
+<gloss>period of Japanese colonial rule (of Korea; 1910-1945)</gloss>

I'll make that "esp" as it could it applied to Taiwan, etc. too.

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>era of Japanese imperialism (Korea)</gloss>
+<gloss>era of Japanese imperialism (esp. Korea)</gloss>

陽画	2,037		
ポジ	418,685

I don't think "image" is needed.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1125030">ポジ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1170260">陰画</xref>
@@ -13 +15 @@
-<gloss>positive image</gloss>
+<gloss>positive</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>positive (photographic) image</gloss>
+<field>&photo;</field>
+<gloss>positive image</gloss>

Noun glosses, just like last year.
中辞典 has "expressionlessness".

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>lack of emotion</gloss>
@@ -19,2 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>emotionless</gloss>
-<gloss>expressionless</gloss>

Updated to have a better definition that's closer to what people would say or write

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>lack of emotion</gloss>
+<gloss>emotionless</gloss>
+<gloss>expressionless</gloss>

https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Part-Of-Speech_(POS)_Issues
"in general the form of the meaning should agree with the first part-of-speech tag for the sense. If the Japanese word is marked as a noun, don't make the translation a verb (e.g. to xxxx) or an adjective."

"emotionless" and "expressionless" are adjectives.

@@ -20,2 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>emotionless</gloss>
-<gloss>expressionless</gloss>

Added the definitions "emotionless" and "expressionless" since those terms are more accurate and used more when looking up this term. It's also to make it easier to find and a more accurate translation.

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>emotionless</gloss>
+<gloss>expressionless</gloss>

Noun glosses.

@@ -19,2 +19 @@
-<gloss>emotionless</gloss>
-<gloss>expressionless</gloss>
+<gloss>lack of emotion</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammage
koj: 印刷用紙1連（1000枚）の質量。紙の厚薄を示す量目単位で、日本ではキログラムで表す。

GG5 has "ream weight" but a ream is 500 sheets.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>ream weight</gloss>
+<gloss>basis weight</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&physics;</field>

Not an expression.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>

Getting them in order. みーちゃんはーちゃん may as well be visible.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミーちゃんハーちゃん</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8 +11,5 @@
-<reb>ミーちゃんハーちゃん</reb>
+<reb>みーちゃんはーちゃん</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミーチャンハーチャン</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

ミーちゃんハーちゃん	2689  63.4%
みいちゃんはあちゃん	812   19.1%
みーちゃんはーちゃん	542   12.8%
ミーチャンハーチャン	199   4.7%

Sources listing ミーちゃんハーちゃん as an alternate spelling:
https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ミーハー
https://gogen-yurai.jp/miihaa/#:~:text=「みいちゃんはあちゃん」は、昭和初期、,ミーハー族」が生まれた。
https://all-guide.com/ag001131/

Added ミーちゃんハーちゃん with consideration for みーちゃんはーちゃん* and ミーチャンハーチャン** (see bottom of comment)

ミーちゃんハーちゃん actually gets the most hits on ngrams but I put it second because みいちゃんはあちゃん seems to be the definitive origin for this term and consistently the first to show up on online definitions. There is an album titled ミーちゃんハーちゃん from 1982 that may be contributing to the difference. 

*みーちゃんはーちゃん: This one gets a fair number of hits on ngrams compared to みいちゃんはあちゃん but I was unable to find any usage of it online, including even a single site that listed it as an alternative spelling. Therefore I did not add it to the entry.

**ミーチャンハーチャン: Returns almost 1/4th as many results as みいちゃんはあちゃん. I did find examples of this being used to mean faddist/follow-the-crowd type, although it seems to be a largely outdated spelling. Below are two examples of it being used:
https://yab.yomiuri.co.jp/adv/wol/campus/trendeye_0903.html
https://uchikoyoga.hatenablog.com/entry/20200314/1584173378

The judgement of an editor is better than my own so I added ミーちゃんハーちゃん as I felt confident about it and included the other two spellings in the references with explanation.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミーちゃんハーちゃん</reb>

daij
derog: daijr 趣味・教養の低い若い人たち。また、その人たちを卑し
めていう語。

aligning with ミーハー

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -11 +12,7 @@
-<gloss>the follower of each new fad</gloss>
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
+<gloss>faddist</gloss>
+<gloss>follow-the-crowd type</gloss>
+<gloss>lowbrow</gloss>
+<gloss>poser</gloss>
+<gloss>fanboy</gloss>
+<gloss>fangirl</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo
ワンパターン	201,009	99.8%	
ワンパタン	451	0.2%

@@ -8,3 +7,0 @@
-<reb>ワンパタン</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -14 +11,2 @@
-<reb>ワン・パタン</reb>
+<reb>ワンパタン</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -16,0 +15,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +19,5 @@
+<gloss>following a single pattern</gloss>
+<gloss>conforming to the same pattern</gloss>
+<gloss>one-track</gloss>
+<gloss>single-track</gloss>
+<gloss>repetitive</gloss>
@@ -21,3 +25 @@
-<gloss>repetitive</gloss>
-<gloss>being in a rut</gloss>
-<gloss>set in one's ways</gloss>
+<gloss>stereotyped</gloss>

GG5 (much less common)

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>ワンパタン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ワン・パタン</reb>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2858678">自分のことは棚に上げる</xref>

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

I don't think the literal meaning needs to be a separate sense.

@@ -17,4 +17,6 @@
-<gloss>to put to one side</gloss>
-<gloss>to shelve</gloss>
-<gloss>to ignore</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="lit">to put something on a shelf</gloss>
+<gloss>to shut one's eyes to (one's own faults, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to pretend not to see</gloss>
+<gloss>to pay no attention to</gloss>
+<gloss>to forget</gloss>
+<gloss>to fail to notice</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">to put on a shelf</gloss>

@@ -16,5 +15,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">to put something on a shelf</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +20 @@
+<gloss g_type="lit">to put something on a shelf</gloss>

Eijiro:
荷物を棚に上げる : put one's baggage in the overhead bin
本を棚に上げる : put a book on a shelf●put the book up on the shelf
Koj, Daijs. Reverso

See the proposed edit by Brian and Marcus' comments on the rejected thread of this.
I think we should mention the literal use too. I think these glosses are closer to the kokugo versions.
If this revision is approved the xref in the proposed 自分の事は棚に上げる needs to be updated.

@@ -15,0 +16,5 @@
+<gloss g_type="lit">to put something on a shelf</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
@@ -17,2 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>to be blind to one's shortcomings</gloss>
-<gloss>to play innocent</gloss>
+<gloss>to put to one side</gloss>
+<gloss>to shelve</gloss>
+<gloss>to ignore</gloss>

@@ -14,4 +14,3 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1407510">多角形</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1561300">六角形</xref>
-<gloss>-gon (as in polygon, etc.)</gloss>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1578550">五角形</xref>
+<gloss>-gon (as in pentagon, hexagon, etc.)</gloss>

RP: -gon  - comb form 「…角形」: hexagon, polygon, n-gon (n 角形).

I think sense 2 was a mistake.
I wouldn't mind keeping this basic entry, as it's a common suffix and doesn't have the かくがた reading.

@@ -14,9 +14,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1407510">多角形・たかくけい</xref>
-<gloss>polygon</gloss>
-<gloss>-gon</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<s_inf>esp. かくけい</s_inf>
-<gloss>Japanese rectangular envelope (opening on the short side)</gloss>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1407510">多角形</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1561300">六角形</xref>
+<gloss>-gon (as in polygon, etc.)</gloss>

https://fuutouya.com/products/
https://sizekensaku.com/futo/index.html

Is there a source for sense 2? The correct reading appears to be かくがた (which we have as a separate entry).
If we move that sense to かくがた, I think this entry can be dropped. 角形/かくけい does not mean "polygon"; it just appears in the names of polygons.

too encyclopedic

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>Japanese rectangular envelope (opening on the short dimension; numbered 0-8, A3, A4, each with different sizes)</gloss>
+<gloss>Japanese rectangular envelope (opening on the short side)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2526740">マイナス思考</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="2526740">マイナス思考</xref>

Not quite the same thing.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2526740">マイナス思考</xref>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>optimism</gloss>

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>positive thought</gloss>
+<gloss>positive thinking</gloss>

ミドルウェア	145227	87.1%
ミドルウエア	21528	12.9%

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミドルウエア</reb>

Entry created

koj
白色雑音	        2,655		
ホワイトノイズ	21,210

Oxford tags "white noise" as a physics term.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1123080">ホワイトノイズ</xref>

GG5: 【物】 white noise

Perhaps the term is too general for this field tag? Anyway, it's not just a computing term.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
+<field>&physics;</field>

Entry created

GG5

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>lap of honor</gloss>

https://www.nme.com/news/music/damon-albarn-friendship-comrade-noel-gallagher-2383923
 what Albarn at the time called a “victory lap” and “the ultimate self-congratulatory Britpop moment”.

becomes...

https://nme-jp.com/news/37284/
共作した楽曲について「ウイニング・ラン」と評し、「究極の自己満悦的なブリット・ポップ的瞬間」

https://kotobank.jp/word/ウイニングラン-438294
１ 野球で、勝利を決めた得点。決勝の一点。
２ 陸上のトラック競技や自動車レースなどで、優勝した選手が観客の声援にこたえて、ゆっくり一周すること。

Actually, eijiro and reverso have this too
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=ウイニングラン

Ran into this looking at something else.  An E->J translator handled a quotation of "victory lap" with this term. daijs, eijiro, image search all confirm.

[1] appears to be baseball. (the run that wins the game)

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<field>&baseb;</field>
@@ -18,0 +20,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>victory lap</gloss>

ウイニングラン	13672
ウィニングラン	6374

ik?

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>ウィニングラン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウィニング・ラン</reb>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウイニング・ラン</reb>

Plenty of non-medical web results for 腑分けする. I don't think it's that rare.
腑分 has the same kanji as 腑分け so rK is not applicable.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -28,2 +27,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1199270">解剖・2</xref>
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
@@ -32 +30 @@
-<gloss>sorting out</gloss>
+<gloss>putting in order</gloss>

GG5, etc.
腑分け	6741
解剖	1008168

The JEs just xref to 解剖. They also use "analysis" for sense 2, so I'm moving it up.

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<gloss>analysis</gloss>
@@ -31,2 +32 @@
-<gloss>sorting out (e.g. feelings)</gloss>
-<gloss>analysis</gloss>
+<gloss>sorting out</gloss>

sankoku
１．「古風」解剖
２．複雑なものを分類・整理すること。「自分の感情を～する」

https://kotobank.jp/word/腑分-2080850
腑分
① 解剖のこと
② 転じて、詳細に分析すること。

#Nonmedical, Dissecting characteristics of ....
性格を解剖	174	100.0%
性格を腑分け	0	0.0%   (does exist, just not enough for ngrams)

Confirmation that the medical usage is dated.
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/解剖
江戸時代には腑分け（ふわけ）とも称された。

Can google "感情の腑分け" and "感情を腑分け". Neither is common enough for ngrams. Use in the wild:
https://twitter.com/lastbreath0902/status/1607482666458419200
...
そう、まるで大人みたいに自分の感情を腑分けできたのなら、起こっていないすれ違い。
それは生の感情を分割できない
...


yourei book result.  google translates as "understand" (in context)
再現可能な手法で自然を腑分けし、  Using a reproducible method to understand nature,
https://www.aozora.gr.jp/cards/000055/files/56499_51225.html

another result on marxism 要素の基本的性格を腑分けし
マルクスの強調点は、現在の社会構造を構成する諸要素を分析するだけでなく、それらの要素の基本的性格を腑分けし、概念へともたらすことを通じて、...

https://cjjc.weblio.jp/content/腑分けする
to arrange by kinds or classes; to arrange in order
classify

add [dated] to [1], created [2] and marked [rare]. (not impossible to find, but not-at-all common, and probably fine to use the xref instead).

[2] is not in daijs but is in sankoku and others. splitting lets us mark [dated] properly. (sense [2] does not appear to be dated).

It appears that [2] here is probably the same as  解剖[2] in the xref for most/all practical purposes. Any collocation with 腑分け appears to be present with 解剖 as well. 解剖[2] could probably be improved to make it clear that it is not medical (especially with the inclusion of "postmortem" in the glosses, which maybe does not belong). 

Here's "problem", the only term I've found ngrams for this and the xref:
問題を解剖	137	69.5%
問題を腑分け	60	30.5%

Other things that can be direct object of 腑分け(found in yourei):
感情 feelings
性格 the nature of something (e.g. man)
自然 nature itself
善悪 good and evil
...miscellaneous complex factors leading to Japanese militarization

Here's a very recent example in asahi shinbun's book review section, found googling "性格を腑分けし". "dissect the characteristics of" might actually be the most straight-forward gloss here.
https://book.asahi.com/jinbun/article/14329301
このような大胆な分析が説得力を持つのは、双系社会と長老原理に基づく古代社会への深い理解だけでなく、「徹底した史料批判」によって、史料自体が帯びる政治的性格を腑分けし実態をすくい上げていく手腕によるのだろう。

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>腑分</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,0 +18,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1199270">解剖・1</xref>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
@@ -15,0 +22,11 @@
+<gloss>postmortem examination</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1199270">解剖・2</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>dissection (e.g. of a problem)</gloss>
+<gloss>sorting out (e.g. feelings)</gloss>
+<gloss>analysis</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Entry created

gg5, prog, wisdom

@@ -14,2 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>to fall victim to</gloss>
-<gloss>to fall prey to</gloss>
+<gloss>to become a victim (of)</gloss>
+<gloss>to fall victim (to)</gloss>
+<gloss>to lose one's life</gloss>

Eijiro, リーダーズ+プラス, ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>性的悪戯</keb>
+<keb>性的イタズラ</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>性的イタズラ</keb>
+<keb>性的悪戯</keb>

性的いたずら	2195	73.3%
性的悪戯	479	16.0%
性的イタズラ	321	10.7%

Those forms are common enough to be visible.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,6 +16,0 @@
-<re_restr>性的いたずら</re_restr>
-<re_restr>性的悪戯</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>せいてきイタズラ</reb>
-<re_restr>性的イタズラ</re_restr>
@@ -24 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

eij, 
prog: 
"a child molester　子供に性的いたずらをする人"
"molest 1 ((形式))〈女性・少年に〉みだらなことをする［言う］，性的いたずらを
する."
"interfere ... 8 ((婉曲))（…に）暴行する，いたずらをする；（子供に）性
的いたずらをする((with ...))."
bing: 59k, 30k, 22k

I think the specific nuance is that it's often kids doing it 
to other kids, but I'm not really sure

Style alignment.

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<gloss>losing one's virginity (of a male)</gloss>
-<gloss>(male) virginity loss</gloss>
+<gloss>loss of virginity (of a male)</gloss>

Not sure it's needed.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>(male) virginity loss</gloss>

OK. Drop it.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>

It's 喪失, not 損失. I wouldn't have thought this was col.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2257600">処女喪失・しょじょそうしつ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2257600">処女喪失</xref>

Daijirin has ベーコンなど。too.

refs/comments at xref. The "bacon" bit was copied straight out of the daijs entry. Didn't hurt, but seems superfluous here.

marked [rare] based on modern uses, though based on the number of old book results, it might merely be [dated].

@@ -15 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>smoked meat (e.g. bacon)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2858728">燻製肉</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>smoked meat</gloss>

daij koj

I don't think the x-ref is helpful.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1253840">傑作・1</xref>

GG5: a work of the highest quality; a masterpiece; a masterwork; one's magnum opus.

Having a solitary plural gloss sitting in the middle of singular ones looks very odd, Anyway, I doubt it's actually needed; the other five are quite sufficient.
Also, we are fairly wary of quoting verbatim from Eijiro - see the Editorial Policy.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>greatest works</gloss>

I do see that we don't usually do (s).  This situation seems exceptional to me, I just don't know how to address it.

Suggestion #2: just make "greatest works" plural (also a deviation from our style, but it is sometimes done in mostly-plural cases).  Eijiro even does this:
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=最高傑作
crowning work
greatest works
magnum opus

The issue here remains that "highest", "crowning", "greatest", "magnum opus" all strongly imply that this is singular. (and masterpiece and masterwork, while not strictly defined as singular, are quite compatible with this interpretation). 　最高 also seems like it could be "the absolute best". 

That makes the whole entry misleading. If you were seeing this in a J->E context, you could easily be lead to believe "there must be only one thing", when 最高傑作 does not have this limitation, and is quite often plural/uncountable.

I assumed it was the #1 best thing, until I went searching for examples and discovered it was not.  That's what I wanted to address for other dictionary users.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>greatest work</gloss>
+<gloss>greatest works</gloss>

We don't usually do "(s)" endings.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>greatest work(s)</gloss>
+<gloss>greatest work</gloss>

One of...
傑作の一つ	14858
最高傑作の一つ	6851

https://tr-ex.me/翻訳/日本語-英語/傑作
最高傑作は
-masterpiece
the perfect album
the best works
finest work

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=最高傑作
greatest works
(among others)

Google returns some nice examples when simply searching
最高傑作 "greatest masterpieces"

I would personally do this:
(greatest) masterpiece(s)
But I feel like this will be too ugly to be accepted.

xref in an attempt to make it clear that you might be saying more than you mean to with "最高傑作". "傑作" is already legitimately "a masterpiece".  This entry is "among their greatest masterpieces", or something like that.

The selection of glosses here, along with 最高, give the strong impression that only one work applies.  But ngrams for "最高傑作の一つ" give away that this is not necessarily the case.  

In the structure "one of their "..., none if the existing glosses seemed to me to apply.  "One of their finest works" seems most natural to me, "one of their best/greatest works", one of their greatest masterpieces... 

"best" (or "greatest") seems more appropriate here than it did in "傑作"  If you search "傑作" and "best work", the results will tend toward "最高傑作". 

masterwork can legitimately go with 傑作 alone. That said, "masterpiece" seems like the most common gloss for 傑作 or for  最高傑作, so I've moved it up.

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1253840">傑作・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1253840">傑作・1</xref>
+<gloss>masterpiece</gloss>
@@ -13 +16 @@
-<gloss>masterpiece</gloss>
+<gloss>greatest work(s)</gloss>

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>Keijou (name given to Seoul during the Japanese occupation)</gloss>
+<gloss>Keijō (name given to Seoul during the Japanese occupation)</gloss>

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1075370">ソウル・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2843957">ソウル</xref>

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1075370">ソウル・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1075370">ソウル・2</xref>

https://kotobank.jp/word/赦状-525207

Nikk gives 1880 as the earliest recorded use. Appears to be obsolete.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>

Koj, Daijr/s, etc.

I suspect it's [arch].

赦状	0	0.0%
赦免状	1337	100.0%

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2438250">赦免状</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

daij, koj

Probably archaic.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

Koj, Daijr/s, etc.

赦状	0	0.0%
赦免状	1337	100.0%
赦書	0	0.0%

daijs:
https://kotobank.jp/word/赦書-525195
赦書: 赦免の書状。赦状。
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/赦状/
赦状: 刑罰を許すことを記した書状。赦免状。赦書。

yourei 赦免状: 57 matches
https://yourei.jp/赦免状
赦書: 3 matches
https://yourei.jp/赦書
赦状: 2 matches
https://yourei.jp/赦状

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2438250">赦免状</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

daij, koj

n-grams

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>冠履顚倒</keb>
+<keb>冠履転倒</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>冠履転倒</keb>
+<keb>冠履顚倒</keb>

djr, djs, koj, shinmeikai

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>冠履顚倒</keb>
+</k_ele>

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>

That was me.

https://kotobank.jp/word/冠履顛倒-471728
冠履転倒	25

@@ -12 +12,6 @@
-<gloss>Out of order, upside down, chaotic</gloss>
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>disorder</gloss>
+<gloss>chaos</gloss>
+<gloss>inversion</gloss>

https://product-senses.mazrica.com/senseslab/sales/close-rate
Reverso

Maybe a bit obvious.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1329970">受注</xref>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>order acceptance rate</gloss>

https://www.innovation.co.jp/urumo/close_rate/#:~:text=受注率とは？,することもできます。

受注率	4552

The various noises are marked that way.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see">ブラウン運動・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1967790">ブラウン運動</xref>
+<field>&physics;</field>

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/09/23/well/mind/brown-noise.html
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brownian_noise

I think tagging it physics would be confusing. White noise isn't tagged like that.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1967790">ブラウン運動</xref>
-<field>&physics;</field>
+<xref type="see">ブラウン運動・1</xref>
+<gloss>Brown noise</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ブラウニアンノイズ
ブラウニアンノイズ	0
ブラウンノイズ	108
ブラウン・ノイズ	0
ブラウニアン	0

Should probably be ブラウニアンノイズ, which gets 0 n-grams but similar Googits. Could have its own entry.

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -13 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>brown noise</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1967790">ブラウン運動</xref>
+<field>&physics;</field>
+<gloss>Brownian noise</gloss>

Sorry. I meant to delete it.

Would probably be ok with an [arch] tag, but I'm not fussed.

I don't think this is needed. It's archaic and all the top n-gram terms and web results appear to be じきしん.

I've proposed an entry for じきしん and I'll close this.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<reb>じぶんのことをたなにあげる</reb>
+<reb>じぶんのことはたなにあげる</reb>

I don't think the あげる forms need to be visible.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

GG5: 自分のことを棚に上げる shut one's eyes to [forget, fail to notice] one's own 「faults [blemish]; do not see the beam in one's own eye
中辞典: 自分のことを棚にあげる ┏shut one's eyes to [be blind to] one's own faults [blemishes, shortcomings]; 《文》 do not see the beam in one's own eye
ルミナス: 彼は自分のことは*棚に上げて人のことを言う He cannot see the beam in his own eye.

Interesting that the JEs all lead their 棚に上げる entries with this extended form. Quite a set phrase.
I think they all can be visible. More plausible ordering.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>自分のことは棚に上げる</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<keb>自分のことは棚に上げる</keb>
+<keb>自分のことは棚にあげる</keb>
@@ -12,5 +14,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>自分のことは棚にあげる</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -25 +22,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2086780">棚に上げる</xref>
@@ -27 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>to ignore one's own shortcomings (when judging others)</gloss>
+<gloss>to ignore one's own shortcomings</gloss>
+<gloss>to shut one's eyes to one's own faults</gloss>

自分の事は棚に	11928	20.9%
自分のことは棚に	22809	39.9%
自分の事を棚に	6593	11.5%
自分のことを棚に	15822	27.7%

I like this little dictionary...
https://takashionary.com/tana-ni-ageru/
(自分のことを/は) 棚たなに上あげる is a Japanese idiom that literally means “put (oneself) up on a shelf” and figuratively means “to behave hypocritically”, just like “the pot calling the kettle black”.
This idiom is used to describes hypocritical behaviour, in which someone criticises others for a fault or mistake that they have themselves.

The poster here *didn't* like "hypocritical", as suggested by his teacher (ちょと違うようにも思います), but I do.
http://www.wa.commufa.jp/~anknak/qa26.htm
When asked for similar idioms, also got the replies:
　・You should practice what you preach.です。
 The pot calls (or called) the kettle black.
Those who live in glass houses should never throw stones. 
 Practice what you preach.
Know your own faults before blaming others for theirs.

I could personally add the biblical quote:
You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye

I don't think any of these idioms belong here (the expression is only half-complete). But this is the flavor.

I believe the underlying entry for 棚に上げる is faulty, in that the glosses act as if they were for *this* entry. Absent a direct object, 棚に上げる can't mean more than "to set aside", "to act as if (an inconvenient truth) does not exist", which is an edit I will make after finishing this entry.

While 棚に上げる is very diverse in what you can ignore (generally some kind of personal shortcoming, but also an inconvenient impediment to a plan you have, etc.), this particular construction is *extremely* common (see ngrams), and is probably the best representative for "棚に上げる".  It's certainly common enough (60,000+ ngrams over its combinations) to be justified here I think.  

sankoku uses this expression as an example (自分のことは棚に上げて、人のせいにする]
daijs uses a similar example:
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/棚に上げる/
自分のことは上げて人の悪口ばかり言う

This is not, however, and idiom with a proper "ending". I think there is no use trying to complete it.

Note, takashionary.com gives a self-effacing use of the expression, acknowledging a certain hypocrisy in what one is about to say:
自分(じぶん)のことは棚に上げて言（い）うけど、彼（かれ）ちょっと太（ふと）りすぎだよね。
I’m saying this by putting myself up on a shelf, but I think he is a bit too fat.

There seems to be something deliberate in the accusation here.  How did your shortcomings/issues/etc *get* on the shelf?  *you* put them there.  棚に上げる currently has "to be blind to one's shortcomings".  But the accusation seems to be that you've (consciously or unconsciously) chosen to ignore your shortcomings.  "to play innocent", I cannot find support for this.  Yes, it is "to act as if one is without fault", but I only see this in the context of judging others.  

The あげる (vs. 上げる) forms are certainly common enough.  [sK] only because all these combinations (事x上げる) seem superfluous (and obvious). Can't get ngrams on the あげる forms because the idiom is too long to have been tallied.

I still wish we could consolidate this の・を・が・は variants into single entries.  Picking は as the most common form (as a basis for *comparison* for hypocritical judgement of someone else). But 自分のことを is also quite common.

強張りが	        1,126	15.3%	
強ばりが	        270	3.7%	
こわばりが	5,976	81.1%

I think "stiffness" should lead.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>stiffness</gloss>
@@ -17 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>stiffness</gloss>

KOD
強張る	7856	6.4%
強ばる	1533	1.3%
こわばる	14799	12.1%
強張り	8287	6.8%
強ばり	2108	1.7%
こわばり	87766	71.7%

Useful, especially for text glossing. Interesting that the kana noun form is so dominant.

Resubmit with references.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<gloss>Christmas swag</gloss>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<gloss>Christmas swag</gloss>

Lots of pages says it's from German, e.g: 
https://www.etsy.com/uk/listing/1427767485/posy-of-dried-flowers-swag-hanging-bunch   "Swag means "wall decoration" in German."

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>swag (wall decoration)</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="ger"/>
+<gloss>swag (wall decoration of flowers, leaves, etc.)</gloss>

https://tsuchikaze.jp/blogs/dryflower/beginner
https://shokubutsuseikatsu.jp/article/news/p/2640/
https://minne.com/mag/articles/2322
https://search.rakuten.co.jp/search/mall/スワッグ/
https://hitohana.tokyo/swag

ngrams
スワッグ	9931

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>changing the flavor of a dish in the middle of a meal by adding flavorings</gloss>
+<gloss>changing the flavor of a dish in the middle of a meal by adding condiments, seasoning, etc.</gloss>

Yes, [col].

Also in jitsuyou. Refs all say "俗"

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

Sankoku, Daijirin, Daijisen

Came across in conversation with family recently. 865 n-gram count for 味変 seems low, but common on social media (https://twitter.com/search?q=味変&src=typed_query&f=live), and turning up in news segments (https://youtu.be/GTmzzb38UG4?si=MXEbx5R8YjD-xNhT&t=258)

Definitely.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>shot from midfield (soccer)</gloss>
+<gloss>shot from midfield (in soccer)</gloss>

GG5, WWW images.
ミドルシュート	129337

I'm guessing it's wasei.

GG5, Unidic
壁飾り	46086	97.7%
壁かざり	1100	2.3%

GG5 mentions murals but the WWW images just have decorative objects.

daijr:  ひたすら仏道に向かう心。
nikk: 正しくまっすぐな心。ひたむきに仏道をめざす心。

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>pure and innocent heart</gloss>
+<gloss>pure heart</gloss>
+<gloss>heart devoted to Buddhism</gloss>

Koj, Daijs

See comments on 2858674.

This term, unlike 燻製肉, is used with food articles on wikipedia.
https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?fulltext=1&search="燻製肉"&title=特別:検索&ns0=1

daijs entry for 燻肉
https://kotobank.jp/word/燻肉-487863
燻製にした肉。ベーコンなど。


燻製肉	1498	76.1%
薫製肉	316	16.0%
燻肉	123	6.2%
薫肉	32	1.6%

Twitter for 燻製肉, thousands? of results
site:twitter.com "燻製肉"
Twitter for 燻肉, ~5? real results
site:twitter.com "燻肉"

I wouldn't go out of my way to add this, but daijs has the relatively uncommon term 燻肉, so we have it as well. I'd like to mark 燻肉 as [rare] and point at something better, which would be this entry.  (Searching book results vs. the internet, 燻肉 is not so uncommon in old books, so perhaps [dated].  Not common in modern books, unlike 燻製肉, which is). Not accounting for age, yourei shows 37 examples of 燻製肉, and 7 of 燻肉.

I see that " (e.g. bacon)" was copied straight out of the daijs entry for 燻肉. I'm usually a fan of extra data in the glosses, but I am pretty sure "smoked meat" is clear enough to not need it.

自分のことを棚に	15,822		
自分のことは棚に	22,809

Nearly as common as the は version. I think we should have both.

daijr, koj

koj
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/日本野球機構
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nippon_Professional_Baseball