Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ アイデンティティ　　 │ 593,451 │ 78.1% │
│ アイデンティティー　 │ 161,441 │ 21.3% │
│ アイデンテティ　　　 │   2,948 │  0.4% │ - sk
│ アイデンテティー　　 │     996 │  0.1% │
│ アイデンティテ　　　 │     403 │  0.1% │
│ アイデンティーティー │     104 │  0.0% │
│ アイデンチチ　　　　 │      96 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

RP, daijr
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/upskill

I think "upskilling" is is more accurate.
Web results show plenty of examples of transitive and intransitive use.

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -14 +16 @@
-<gloss>reskilling</gloss>
+<gloss>upskilling</gloss>

skill up 10794

It probably was originally.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">skill-up</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">skill up</lsource>

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/skill_up

I suspect this is not wasei.

smk

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1109560">フェードイン</xref>

フェードアウト	106417
フェード・アウト	2884
GG5, etc.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>フェード・アウト</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +13,2 @@
+<field>&film;</field>
+<field>&tv;</field>
@@ -10,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>dissolve</gloss>

not in common use

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<gloss>FO</gloss>

smk

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1109550">フェードアウト</xref>

フェードイン	24039	93.2%
フェード・イン	1761	6.8%
GG5, etc.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>フェード・イン</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,2 @@
+<field>&film;</field>
+<field>&tv;</field>

not in common use

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<gloss>FI</gloss>

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<field>&photo;</field>
@@ -11 +12 @@
-<gloss>positive (photography)</gloss>
+<gloss>positive</gloss>

daij, gg5

Aligning.

@@ -9,2 +9 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1125070">ポジティブ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1125070">ポジティブ・2</xref>
@@ -12 +11 @@
-<gloss>positive</gloss>
+<gloss>positive (photography)</gloss>

陽画	2,037		
ポジ	418,685

陽画 isn't especially common.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1546980">陽画</xref>

daij, meikyo

@@ -18 +18,4 @@
-<gloss>positive (photography)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1125030">ポジ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1546980">陽画</xref>
+<field>&photo;</field>
+<gloss>positive</gloss>
@@ -22,2 +25,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1547000">陽極・ようきょく</xref>
-<gloss>positive (electrical polarity)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1547000">陽極</xref>
+<gloss>positive (pole)</gloss>
+<gloss>anode</gloss>

Daijr: " 電気の陽極。"

@@ -19,0 +20,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1547000">陽極・ようきょく</xref>
+<gloss>positive (electrical polarity)</gloss>
+</sense>

daijr

Splitting.

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1092790">ネガティブ</xref>
+<gloss>positive (e.g. thinking)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -14,2 +18 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1092790">ネガティブ</xref>
-<gloss>positive</gloss>
+<gloss>positive (photography)</gloss>

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<re_inf>&rk;</re_inf>

みいはあ is the form in the kokugos. Most of them have a "普通「ミーハー」と書く" note but the headword is みいはあ. It should be visible. rare kana candidate.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

0.1%

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<reb>みーはー</reb>
+<reb>みいはあ</reb>
@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<reb>みいはあ</reb>
+<reb>みーはー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

ミーハー	665737     96.9%
みーはー	20810      3.0%   
みいはあ	576        0.1%

Added みーはー

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>みーはー</reb>

Harmless, but not exactly idiomatic English (at least to me.)

It's also often referred to as "sports festival" in official translations of Japanese media

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>sports festival</gloss>

FWIW, to me it sounds very natural to use "field day" to refer to both the day and the event.

If we're including "sports day" we should have the AmE equivalent as well. I've read the discussion below and I agree with Marcus that the "day" glosses are perfectly valid.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>athletic meet (esp. at school)</gloss>
+<gloss>athletic meet (esp. at a school)</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>field day</gloss>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>usu. in negative</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. with neg. sentence</s_inf>

遠慮会釈	5576	  
遠慮会釈なく	2135	  
遠慮会釈無く	901	  
遠慮会釈なし	465	  
遠慮会釈もなく	430	  
遠慮会釈のない	316	  
遠慮会釈ない	234	  
遠慮会釈もない	103	 
etc.
  

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/遠慮会釈/
一般には「遠慮会釈もない」と否定の表現を伴う。

There is some inconsistency on the xref forms compared to 情け容赦なく. (i.e. xref should probably be 遠慮会釈なく), but I'm not overly worried about this, so long as the negation is pointed out.
 
Stronger than 多く, this time we get "一般には used with negation". (still fairly confident that all three of my recent edits are almost-always negative, and for the same reasons).

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2766460">遠慮会釈もない</xref>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<s_inf>usu. in negative</s_inf>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

NHK is notoriously picky about its use of words, but that doesn't mean it's the arbiter of the meanings. In line with the references I quoted I think "(esp. someone killed)" is enough. Splitting into two senses looks messy. (This essentially goes back to the anonymous edit of 2023-09-04.)

@@ -22,6 +21,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>dead</gloss>
-<gloss>death</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -30 +24 @@
-<gloss>victim</gloss>
+<gloss>victim (esp. someone killed)</gloss>

But the NHK reference essentially makes it clear that if this word or 犠牲者 are used in news reporting, they refer to the number of deaths. Isn't it misleading then to just mention it as an exp, while the second gloss is "casualty" which is how the word just isn't used in news media?

@@ -21,0 +22,6 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>dead</gloss>
+<gloss>death</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24 +30 @@
-<gloss>victim (esp. someone killed)</gloss>
+<gloss>victim</gloss>

I think the "(esp. someone killed)" covers it adequately. I'll drop that proposed death/dead sense.

@@ -26,5 +25,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>death</gloss>
-<gloss>dead</gloss>

https://www.nhk.or.jp/bunken/research/kotoba/pdf/20150301_5.pdf
Ｑ　「犠牲者」
犠牲者は死者だけでなくけが人も含むはずで，
犠牲者＝死者という使い方には疑問を感じます。
Ａ　「犠牲者」は，一般に「亡くなった人」のこと
を指すものと解釈されています。
[...]

　「犠牲」の本来の意味からはずれるため，事故
の原因が無謀な行いや計画にあるような場合に
は，抵抗感をもつ人もいるので，注意する。また，
個々の事例については，「～して死亡しました」の
ように，具体的に言うほうがよい場合もある。
（『NHK ことばのハンドブック（第 2 版）』p.58）

I can't say I've ever seen it used for injured people.

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>victim</gloss>
+<gloss>victim (esp. someone killed)</gloss>

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>basis weight</gloss>

https://visipri.com/products/poster/poster_info_mm.html
斤量は連量の俗称で、意味は連量と同じです。

Aligning sense 3 with 連量. The gloss should probably mention thickness.
Doesn't meet the threshold for spec1 (or spec2).

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -10 +8,0 @@
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -21,2 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1336900">重量・1</xref>
-<gloss>weight (measured on a scale)</gloss>
+<gloss>(measured) weight</gloss>
@@ -26,2 +23,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1922200">坪量</xref>
-<gloss>paper weight (as kg per 1000 sheets)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1922160">連量</xref>
+<gloss>weight of 1000 sheets of paper (used as a measure of thickness)</gloss>

GG5 and most of the kokugos only mention the general "weight" sense. WWW hits are dominated by the horseracing sense. I don't think the general meaning rates a "rare".

@@ -20,0 +21,5 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1336900">重量・1</xref>
+<gloss>weight (measured on a scale)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24,6 +28,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1336900">重量・1</xref>
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>weight (measured on a scale)</gloss>

daijs

１ はかりで量った重さ。目方。量目。斤目。
２ 競馬で、出走馬に課せられる負担重量。



目方	31713	15.5%
量目	12449	6.1%
斤目	643	0.3%
斤量	160312	78.2%  <--- this term, but it's all horse racing

https://www.printexpress.co.jp/blog/2019/08/26/paper-weight/


紙の連量、坪量、斤量、紙厚とは？違いは？
https://www.book-hon.com/column/8582/
斤量（きんりょう）も紙の重さを表す単位ですが、原紙1,000枚の重さをkgで表す単位です。

Including charts on 斤量 vs. paper thickness
https://www.iropuri.com/guide/technical/paper/pe002.html
弊社の斤量は四六判というサイズの紙が1,000枚のときに何kgになるかで表記されております。

紙の厚さについて詳しくなろう！
https://www.moriichi-net.co.jp/blog/thickness/
紙を注文するときに耳にする「連量(れんりょう)」「斤量(きんりょう)」など。
斤量(きんりょう)って何？
斤量とは 、用紙の厚さを表す単位です。
原紙1,000枚の時の重さ(kg)を表します。

Search wikipedia for this term, endless horse racing articles:
https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?fulltext=1&search="斤量"&title=特別:検索&ns0=1

Suggest removing [spec1].  

Popular in the niche of horse racing, which has evidently generated a lot of literature. But this feels like an obscure term for most Japanese language students. (not rare, obviously, but not "hey, you should learn this"). yourei examples(400+) are predominantly horse racing. Other entries I found were merely ambiguous, and might have been horse racing too(no context). 

eijiro doesn't have a definition for 斤量.  wordreference doesn't have one. very few reverso entries.  This term does not appear on the wikipedia page for "heavyweight boxer" in Japanese (a sports context where generic weigh-ins might occur).  Appears to be predominantly a horse racing term

Etymology is that the lead weights used to make sure the horse carried its minimum burden were 斤. Or something like that.

Happens to come up in the paper industry.　Turns up all over the place in a 斤量 意味 image search. (along with the horses)

See xref for more horseracing refs.

sankoku let me down. Basically gives [3], (scale mentioned, which is unusual for "weight" terms).  Didn't mention horse racing at all.

@@ -14 +14,15 @@
-<gloss>weight</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2858709">負担重量</xref>
+<field>&horse;</field>
+<gloss>impost</gloss>
+<gloss>assigned weight</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1922200">坪量</xref>
+<gloss>paper weight (as kg per 1000 sheets)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1336900">重量・1</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>weight (measured on a scale)</gloss>

gg5, prog, luminous, daij

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>No Hunting!</gloss>
+<gloss>prohibition of hunting</gloss>

Or even "(being)".

Oxford (be obliged): be indebted or grateful

adj-na indicates that the word is a 形容動詞, not that it typically takes な. A 形容動詞 doesn't stop being adjectival when it's used predicatively. There are quite a few 形容動詞 that are rarely used attributively.
That being said, I hadn't noticed that sankoku (in contrast to the other kokugos) has 幸甚 as a noun only. Also, I might have been wrong to assume that 幸甚に is adverbial in 幸甚に存じる. Nouns can take に in 〜存じる expressions.
Noun glosses are less elegant but I think 幸甚 is in fact functioning as a noun in all the examples in the JEs and kokugos.
There's only one sense here. I don't think "obliged" is any less correct than the other glosses. It's synonymous with "grateful" within the contexts in which 幸甚 is actually used.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -15,3 +14,4 @@
-<gloss>extremely grateful</gloss>
-<gloss>much obliged</gloss>
-<gloss>very happy</gloss>
+<gloss>being extremely grateful</gloss>
+<gloss>being much obliged</gloss>
+<gloss>being very appreciative</gloss>
+<gloss>being very happy</gloss>

I like the glosses here, but I agree with Jim that placing [adj-na] at the front gives the wrong idea about usage.  I imagine the goal of [adj-na,n] is to be consistent with adjective glosses, but really the glosses do not correspond to adj-na usage. 幸甚な母親 is not "an extremely grateful mother".  "幸甚な人"　doesn't even return google OR even a single book result.

So putting [adj-na] up front is in a way even more misleading.

As part of the big picture in thinking about this, is there any way you can imagine adding similar glosses (grateful, obliged, happy) to 幸い?  They'd surely make a bigger impact there.

I still think there might be something to the idea of a dedicated [id] sense. The other problem here is that "幸甚" does not literally(or even figuratively) mean "obliged", and right now it kind-of looks like it does... Highlighting that the glosses are idiomatic might help with that.  I realize this is not something that is currently done.

幸甚	80252
幸甚な	211

My main concern with having "adj-na" prominent is that implies the use of 幸甚な, which is actually quite rare.

adj-na is correct. It's a 形容動詞 that's only used predicatively or adverbially. 
I don't think "usu. as ～です" is a helpful note, and 幸甚に存じます only accounts for a little over 10% of usage. It's difficult to explain how the word is used without cluttering the entry. I think a simple "usu. in letters" note is sufficient.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -13,4 +14,4 @@
-<s_inf>usu. as ～です, ～に存じます, etc.</s_inf>
-<gloss>(being) deeply grateful</gloss>
-<gloss>(being) much obliged</gloss>
-<gloss>(being) very pleased</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. in letters</s_inf>
+<gloss>extremely grateful</gloss>
+<gloss>much obliged</gloss>
+<gloss>very happy</gloss>

Harmless, but I don't think it adds anything that's not apparent from the other three glosses.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>without a shred of truth</gloss>

I think that's being tautologous. Something can't be partially groundless. Groundless/unfounded/baseless is quite strong.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>completely groundless (rumour, accusation, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>groundless (rumour, accusation, etc.)</gloss>

daijs

I think it's a bit stronger than that
"without basis" vs "without any basis"

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>groundless (rumour, accusation, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>completely groundless (rumour, accusation, etc.)</gloss>

根も葉もない	29,703	95.2%	
根も葉も無い	1,494	4.8%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,2 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>unfounded (e.g. rumour)</gloss>
-<gloss>groundless</gloss>
+<gloss>groundless (rumour, accusation, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>unfounded</gloss>
@@ -19 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>completely untrue</gloss>

GG5: junmai sake; sake in which the only ingredients are rice and yeast
中辞典: sake in which the only ingredients are rice and yeast
ルミナス: 	pure rice sake

Glosses need to be understandable.

@@ -12,3 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2567870">純米</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2567870">純米</xref>
-<gloss>junmai sake</gloss>
+<gloss>junmai sake (sake in which the only ingredients are rice and yeast)</gloss>

I did my original searches for 吟醸純米, but the rational is identical:

Google search (a giant America Liquor store, can't browse from outside of the US so I use a google search)
site:www.totalwine.com ginjo junmai

More-often-then not glossed as  junmai ginjo (sake), or  junmai ginjoshu.
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/純米吟醸酒

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sake
Junmai (純米) is a term used for the sake that is made of pure rice wine without any additional distilled alcohol.

The xref, if approved, should be [see=純米[2]]  (I cannot create it)

純米酒 is overwhelmingly translated into English directly as "junmai sake" (or sometimes even junmai-shu/junmaishu).

We could create an [expl] here that reads:
[expl] sake made from only rice, kōji, and water, without the use of distilled alcohol

Or we could just let the xref solve the problem, which is basically what we do for the ginjo half of junmaiginjo

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>sake made without added alcohol or sugar</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2567870">純米</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2567870">純米</xref>
+<gloss>junmai sake</gloss>

陽画	2,037		
ポジ	418,685

I don't think "image" is needed.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1125030">ポジ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1170260">陰画</xref>
@@ -13 +15 @@
-<gloss>positive image</gloss>
+<gloss>positive</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>positive (photographic) image</gloss>
+<field>&photo;</field>
+<gloss>positive image</gloss>

累計	824613	  
累計残高	97083	  
累計で	57514	  
累計販売	38310	  
累計の	31173	
累計する	1881
累計して	2118

We'd usually have the adjectival tag with the noun form and keep it to one sense. Also there's no need for both "adj-no" and "adj-f" as the ltter can be treated as an omitted の.
GG5 mentions "～する total; sum [add] up" but it fact it is not used much.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -21,7 +21,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>total</gloss>
-<gloss>cumulative</gloss>
-<gloss>accumulated</gloss>

累計	824613	  
累計残高	97083
累計販売	38310	          total sales
累計販売台数	17108	  total units sold
累計販売数	11545	  total sales
累計販売本数	4019	  total books sold
累計出荷	11471             total shipments
累計額	31138	          
累計人気ランキング	24678	  
累計アクセス	16483	  
累計部数	13666	  
累計アクセスランキング	10677	  
累計発行	5799	  
累計ポイント	5742	  
累計発行部数	5111	  
累計生産	4896	  
累計金額	4555	  
累計売上	4542	  
累計の受注件数	4380	  
累計アクセス数	4332	  
累計出荷本数	3500	


Some の examples (limited comparatively)
累計の訪問者数	14284	  
累計の受注	4394	  
累計の受注件数	4380	  
累計の受注件数が	4380	  
累計の販売	799	  
累計の販売台数	599	  
累計の距離	436

I've given only ~1/3rd of the adj-f uses return by the first 100 ngrams.  They are extensive.

The editorial policy suggests that a separate sense could be added if necessary to provide clear glosses for a very-common grammatical pattern.  I'll grant you that it doesn't take a rocket scientist to get from "cumulative total" and "accumulated total" and "cumulative", "total", and "accumulated" as glosses.  My point would only be that the [adj-f] usage appears to be the dominant usage.  I mean, look at する,　は and が. It's a drop in the bucket.
累計する	1881
累計は	17407
累計が	12762

But if you just want to stick adj-f,adj-no in [1], I won't push it.

As for の, it barely appears at all(relatively), and with some specific collocations. (for some reason,累計の訪問者数, not 累計訪問者数) Compare:
累計販売台数	17108	  total units sold
累計の販売台数	599	  

This looked like an exception, but with further research, it looks like even 累計訪問者数 is far more dominant in google news results.  Sometimes inflated numbers (mistakes) show up in the ngrams.
累計訪問者数	712   (but  5 pages of news articles)
累計の訪問者数	14284 (but 1 page of news articles)

@@ -20,0 +21,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>total</gloss>
+<gloss>cumulative</gloss>
+<gloss>accumulated</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

GG5

Extra gloss from GG5.

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<gloss>total up to now</gloss>

As an "unregistered editor", I made perhaps 10000 submissions or more since 2007, and if you went to the feedback page (accessible directly from the old submission form), it was always clear whether or not they were incorporated.

Edict is far more responsive to changes than Eijiro.  As I recall, I once emailed them about a ridiculous translation for 風邪 that they used to have (they called it "wolf's throat") and that remained for years before they removed it.

@@ -17,1 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>total suggestion: change Meaning to "accumulated total."</gloss>
+<gloss>cumulative total</gloss>
+<gloss>accumulated total</gloss>

Seems most kokugos have all three forms.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────────┬───────╮
│ 選ぶ　 │ 20,651,101 │ 99.5% │
│ 撰ぶ　 │      4,445 │  0.0% │
│ 択ぶ　 │      3,952 │  0.0% │
│ えらぶ │     95,509 │  0.5% │
╰─ーーー─┴────────────┴───────╯

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Meikyo has a 〔文〕 tag. Maybe [rare] is okay.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────────╮
│ バター │ 3,437,454 │
│ 牛酪　 │     1,364 │
╰─ーーー─┴───────────╯

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1098620">バター</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

Noun glosses, just like last year.
中辞典 has "expressionlessness".

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>lack of emotion</gloss>
@@ -19,2 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>emotionless</gloss>
-<gloss>expressionless</gloss>

Updated to have a better definition that's closer to what people would say or write

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>lack of emotion</gloss>
+<gloss>emotionless</gloss>
+<gloss>expressionless</gloss>

https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Part-Of-Speech_(POS)_Issues
"in general the form of the meaning should agree with the first part-of-speech tag for the sense. If the Japanese word is marked as a noun, don't make the translation a verb (e.g. to xxxx) or an adjective."

"emotionless" and "expressionless" are adjectives.

@@ -20,2 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>emotionless</gloss>
-<gloss>expressionless</gloss>

Added the definitions "emotionless" and "expressionless" since those terms are more accurate and used more when looking up this term. It's also to make it easier to find and a more accurate translation.

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>emotionless</gloss>
+<gloss>expressionless</gloss>

Noun glosses.

@@ -19,2 +19 @@
-<gloss>emotionless</gloss>
-<gloss>expressionless</gloss>
+<gloss>lack of emotion</gloss>

gg5, nikk

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>glossary</gloss>

we have 辞書 and 字書 apart.  for the sake of consistency, these should probably be apart too

@@ -6,3 +6,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>字彙</keb>

GG5
daijr koj shinkai

Add spelling 字彙.
GG5 merges these, while others distinguish them subtly, as 字
彙 = kanji esp., 辞彙 = words more.
At JMdict probably clearer to merge.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>字彙</keb>

This is our usual style for nouns. Only verbs and adjectives can be "in the negative".

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>usu. in negative</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. with neg. sentence</s_inf>

https://kotobank.jp/word/情容赦-2069565
なさけ‐ようしゃ【情容赦】
〘名〙 情をかけて許すこと。情と遠慮。多く下に打消の語を伴って用いられる。 <--- notes negative in "many" cases

The style is good, thank you for that. 

I think "usu." is more accurate than "often" here, and the goal is to warn away from misuse. I could not find a positive application of this structure(and there are endless negative uses).  

This is one of several structures that behave this way(容赦会釈, 遠慮会釈).  I suspect the etymology is something like 情けも容赦もなく - neither mercy nor compassion.  Doesn't make a lot of sense as a  positive construction(and doesn't appear to be used as such).

My understanding of the ngram analysis here is that the counts for a short term include the counts for all of the longer terms beneath.
情け容赦	40270
情け容赦ない	8962
情け容赦なく	15298
So those 40270 instances of 情け容赦 are not indicative of positive use, but rather capture all the non-overlapping forms beneath it(which in this case are all negated).

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>often in negative</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. in negative</s_inf>

情け容赦	40270
情け容赦ない	8962
情け容赦なく	15298
GG5, etc.

More our style.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>esp. when not granted</s_inf>
+<s_inf>often in negative</s_inf>

情け容赦	40270	  
情け容赦なく	15298	  
情け容赦ない	8962	  
情け容赦のない	5501	  
情け容赦なし	2103	  
情け容赦無し	1407	
etc.

Looking at ngrams, this term is nearly non-existent without negation.

I even tried with を, and just got:
情け容赦をしない	31	  
情け容赦を知らない	22

Following は you get:
情け容赦はない	186	  
情け容赦は無用	138  
情け容赦はしない	63	  
情け容赦はありません	54	  
情け容赦は必要ない	32

I feel like I've tried to add "usually negated" notes to nouns in the past and had them rejected.  Seems appropriate though, if possible. It seems like it would be a mistake to try and use this word as "mercy" in a positive context(ie. "grant mercy", or "mercy is important"), but it is common in varied negative constructions.

sankoku example sentence is: "情け容赦もなく"

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2837999">情け容赦なく</xref>
+<s_inf>esp. when not granted</s_inf>

Quiet for a while. May as well close it.

https://i.imgur.com/i8oNNCQ.png

I hadn't mentioned it earlier because I don't know how reliable a game can be, but a major game released from Japan (Dark Souls 3) uses this word for gauntlets (image above), which was also what prompted my suggestion. Also I don't think I've ever seen a gauntlet / armoured glove that doesn't cover the back of the hand and wrist as well - but a single data point (and from a game) probably is not enough, I'll leave this here as reference and keep my eyes open for more

JEs, Koj, Daijr/s.

The other references are quite specific. I think glove and gauntlet are too general.

@@ -20,3 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>glove</gloss>
-<gloss>bracer</gloss>
-<gloss>gauntlet</gloss>

shinmeikai

shinmeikai mentions "武具・農事用" so I thought those words would fit

@@ -19,0 +20,3 @@
+<gloss>glove</gloss>
+<gloss>bracer</gloss>
+<gloss>gauntlet</gloss>

A+B. Most WWW hits are from here.

This isn't in any of my refs. I think it can be dropped.

容赦会釈	37

Book results make it clear that this behaves like 情け容赦.  First two pages of hits are all in some negative context:
容赦会釈ない
容赦会釈もないほど
容赦会釈もなき空で
容赦会釈なしに
政治家は容赦会釈なしに
ういう風に容赦会釈なく
何等の容赦会釈なく
容赦会釈をするのは水臭いことだ
学校を容赦会釈なく切り捨てた
それでも容赦会釈もなく
生徒に物を教える場合、容赦会釈がなかった。

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1750460">情け容赦</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1750460">情け容赦</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu. in negative</s_inf>

Remove unsupported yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

gg5, wisdom, daij, meikyo
拉ぐ	217		
ひしぐ	728	
拉い	400		
ひしい	1,183

@@ -12,0 +13,10 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to crush</gloss>
+<gloss>to squash</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5g;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to overpower</gloss>
+<gloss>to beat</gloss>

Entry created

Not an expression.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>

Getting them in order. みーちゃんはーちゃん may as well be visible.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミーちゃんハーちゃん</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8 +11,5 @@
-<reb>ミーちゃんハーちゃん</reb>
+<reb>みーちゃんはーちゃん</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミーチャンハーチャン</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

ミーちゃんハーちゃん	2689  63.4%
みいちゃんはあちゃん	812   19.1%
みーちゃんはーちゃん	542   12.8%
ミーチャンハーチャン	199   4.7%

Sources listing ミーちゃんハーちゃん as an alternate spelling:
https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ミーハー
https://gogen-yurai.jp/miihaa/#:~:text=「みいちゃんはあちゃん」は、昭和初期、,ミーハー族」が生まれた。
https://all-guide.com/ag001131/

Added ミーちゃんハーちゃん with consideration for みーちゃんはーちゃん* and ミーチャンハーチャン** (see bottom of comment)

ミーちゃんハーちゃん actually gets the most hits on ngrams but I put it second because みいちゃんはあちゃん seems to be the definitive origin for this term and consistently the first to show up on online definitions. There is an album titled ミーちゃんハーちゃん from 1982 that may be contributing to the difference. 

*みーちゃんはーちゃん: This one gets a fair number of hits on ngrams compared to みいちゃんはあちゃん but I was unable to find any usage of it online, including even a single site that listed it as an alternative spelling. Therefore I did not add it to the entry.

**ミーチャンハーチャン: Returns almost 1/4th as many results as みいちゃんはあちゃん. I did find examples of this being used to mean faddist/follow-the-crowd type, although it seems to be a largely outdated spelling. Below are two examples of it being used:
https://yab.yomiuri.co.jp/adv/wol/campus/trendeye_0903.html
https://uchikoyoga.hatenablog.com/entry/20200314/1584173378

The judgement of an editor is better than my own so I added ミーちゃんハーちゃん as I felt confident about it and included the other two spellings in the references with explanation.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミーちゃんハーちゃん</reb>

daij
derog: daijr 趣味・教養の低い若い人たち。また、その人たちを卑し
めていう語。

aligning with ミーハー

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -11 +12,7 @@
-<gloss>the follower of each new fad</gloss>
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
+<gloss>faddist</gloss>
+<gloss>follow-the-crowd type</gloss>
+<gloss>lowbrow</gloss>
+<gloss>poser</gloss>
+<gloss>fanboy</gloss>
+<gloss>fangirl</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo
ワンパターン	201,009	99.8%	
ワンパタン	451	0.2%

@@ -8,3 +7,0 @@
-<reb>ワンパタン</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -14 +11,2 @@
-<reb>ワン・パタン</reb>
+<reb>ワンパタン</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -16,0 +15,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +19,5 @@
+<gloss>following a single pattern</gloss>
+<gloss>conforming to the same pattern</gloss>
+<gloss>one-track</gloss>
+<gloss>single-track</gloss>
+<gloss>repetitive</gloss>
@@ -21,3 +25 @@
-<gloss>repetitive</gloss>
-<gloss>being in a rut</gloss>
-<gloss>set in one's ways</gloss>
+<gloss>stereotyped</gloss>

GG5 (much less common)

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>ワンパタン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ワン・パタン</reb>

Dropping xref.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2183490">角形・かくけい</xref>

Merging  2742280.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>角型</keb>

Entry created

Aligning.
とんす was dropped from 2410630. I think we can drop とんする from here also. It's obsolete/archaic and only in daijr/s.

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>とんする</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -17,2 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>to gather in large numbers (of people)</gloss>
-<gloss>to hang out (as a large group)</gloss>
+<gloss>to gather (of people)</gloss>
+<gloss>to assemble</gloss>
+<gloss>to hang out</gloss>
@@ -23,2 +21,4 @@
-<gloss>to assemble (as a military unit or posse)</gloss>
-<gloss>to be quartered (in a particular location)</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to assemble (of troops)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be stationed</gloss>
+<gloss>to be quartered</gloss>

https://www.edrdg.org/wwwjdic/wwwverbinf.html#suru_tag (4th paragraph)

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<pos>&vs-s;</pos>
+<pos>&vs-i;</pos>
@@ -21 +21 @@
-<pos>&vs-s;</pos>
+<pos>&vs-i;</pos>

Entry created

@@ -14,4 +14,3 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1407510">多角形</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1561300">六角形</xref>
-<gloss>-gon (as in polygon, etc.)</gloss>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1578550">五角形</xref>
+<gloss>-gon (as in pentagon, hexagon, etc.)</gloss>

RP: -gon  - comb form 「…角形」: hexagon, polygon, n-gon (n 角形).

I think sense 2 was a mistake.
I wouldn't mind keeping this basic entry, as it's a common suffix and doesn't have the かくがた reading.

@@ -14,9 +14,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1407510">多角形・たかくけい</xref>
-<gloss>polygon</gloss>
-<gloss>-gon</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<s_inf>esp. かくけい</s_inf>
-<gloss>Japanese rectangular envelope (opening on the short side)</gloss>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1407510">多角形</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1561300">六角形</xref>
+<gloss>-gon (as in polygon, etc.)</gloss>

https://fuutouya.com/products/
https://sizekensaku.com/futo/index.html

Is there a source for sense 2? The correct reading appears to be かくがた (which we have as a separate entry).
If we move that sense to かくがた, I think this entry can be dropped. 角形/かくけい does not mean "polygon"; it just appears in the names of polygons.

too encyclopedic

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>Japanese rectangular envelope (opening on the short dimension; numbered 0-8, A3, A4, each with different sizes)</gloss>
+<gloss>Japanese rectangular envelope (opening on the short side)</gloss>

Yes, there are far more common compounds, such as 遵法精神, which we don't have.

遵法	27,530		
遵法者	241

I don't think this is needed. Uncommon compound. The original source was eijiro.

遵法者	241

Not an overly common term (vs. "law abiding citizen" in English).  Google translate spit out "law-abiding people". 

I suspect a tourist can be a "遵法者", but not a "law abiding citizen".

I don't think this term really needs to be here(A+B, can't find in kokugos), except that "遵法" has noun glosses that make "law-abiding" impossible there.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>law-abiding citizen</gloss>
+<gloss>law-abiding person</gloss>

Entry created

Sort-of A+B. Not useful.

ngrams

累計メモリ	23

*Two* google book hits.  I suspect one of them is the old computer tech dictionary that we scraped all these terms from years ago.

As a software developer, I've researched "sigma memory" as hard as I can. It's not a thing. Maybe an obscure niche technical descriptor of a specific computer part in the early 90s(or earlier).  Of no value here whatsoever.

This string appears today in places like this ad copy: 累計メモリ販売2万本超, "total memory sales of more than  2 million units", or something like that.  This use of 累計 is bog-standard and doesn't warrant an entry for this.

Entry created

gg5, chujiten, prog
序でながら	845	3.0%	
序ながら	        437	1.6%	
ついでながら	26,897	95.5%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,2 +15,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1008050">序でに</xref>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -16,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>while I have the opportunity (I'd also like to say ...)</gloss>
+<gloss>by the way</gloss>
@@ -18,3 +21 @@
-<gloss>taking the opportunity</gloss>
-<gloss>while (you) are at it</gloss>
-<gloss>on the occasion</gloss>
+<gloss>in passing</gloss>

Entry created

GG5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&math;</field>

I don't think we need to give the number.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>golden ratio (approx. 1.6180339887)</gloss>
+<gloss>golden ratio</gloss>

Entry created

Most refs just have sense 2.

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>made from only rice, kōji, and water, without the use of distilled alcohol</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2858716">純米酢</xref>
+<gloss>(of sake, vinegar, etc) made from only rice, kōji, and water</gloss>
@@ -22 +23 @@
-<gloss>junmai sake</gloss>
+<gloss>junmai sake (sake in which the only ingredients are rice and yeast)</gloss>

daijs' two senses:
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/純米/

Google search (a giant America Liquor store, can't browse from outside of the US)
site:www.totalwine.com ginjo junmai

To the extent that we provide glosses, and not definitions, it seems the original GG5 gloss was correct for the [abbr] entry:"junmai sake".  Sake types are translated into English with the original Japanese terminology.

daijs also very clearly gives two senses, neither of which is an [abbr].  

Minimally 純米 appears in 4 common sake-related compounds, behaving like [adj-f] in all of them:

Junmai Daiginjō-shu (純米大吟醸酒)
Junmai Ginjō-shu (純米吟醸酒)
Tokubetsu Junmai-shu (特別純米酒)
Junmai-shu (純米酒, Pure rice)

daijs also identifies vinegar:
純米酢	15222

here's some others that came up in the ngrams:
純米焼酎 (shōchū made from rice, not potatoes)
純米にごり酒  pure-rice nigorizake
etc.

I don't see how we skip an [adj-f] entry for this.

"without the use of distilled alcohol" is not redundant, because distilled alcohol (or brewer's alcohol) can be made with only rice, koji, and water. daijs explicitly gives the same restriction.

@@ -11,0 +12,8 @@
+<gloss>pure rice</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<gloss>made from only rice, kōji, and water, without the use of distilled alcohol</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -14 +22 @@
-<gloss>sake made without added alcohol or sugar</gloss>
+<gloss>junmai sake</gloss>

seems more convenient just to copy the gloss from 純米酒

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>junmai sake</gloss>
+<gloss>sake made without added alcohol or sugar</gloss>

gg5

GG5: ginjō sake with no added alcohol.

Glosses are expected to mean something to non-Japanese speakers.

@@ -12,2 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2567870">純米</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2567870">純米</xref>
@@ -14,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>ginjō sake with no added alcohol</gloss>

See comments on 純米酒 and 純米.  We're a glossing dictionary.  This is translated into English overwhelmingly as "junmai ginjō sake".  

xref, if approved, should be [see=純米[2]].

We've already used an [xref] to explain ginjō.  If we use an [xref] for 純米, we can forgo the [expl] entirely (my preference).

Otherwise, the "proper" [expl] would seem to be:
[expl] high-quality sake made from only white rice milled to 60%, kōji, and water, brewed by low temperature fermentation without the use of distilled alcohol

This could come up in other terms that use 純米 and/or 吟醸. (I have no intention of entering additional sake types, but I think there is an argument for doing so).

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2567870">純米</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2567870">純米</xref>
@@ -13 +15 @@
-<gloss>ginjō sake with no added alcohol</gloss>
+<gloss>junmai ginjō sake</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>ginjo sake with no added alcohol</gloss>
+<gloss>ginjō sake with no added alcohol</gloss>

中辞典: the ability to fulfill one's responsibilities 《as

I think they help. GG5 tends to have the dry legal translations and 中辞典 explains a bit more.

Do we need the last 2 glosses?

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&law;</field>

GG5, 新和英中辞典, LSD, ＫＯＤ追加語彙, etc.

Style alignment.

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<gloss>losing one's virginity (of a male)</gloss>
-<gloss>(male) virginity loss</gloss>
+<gloss>loss of virginity (of a male)</gloss>

Not sure it's needed.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>(male) virginity loss</gloss>

OK. Drop it.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>

It's 喪失, not 損失. I wouldn't have thought this was col.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2257600">処女喪失・しょじょそうしつ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2257600">処女喪失</xref>

Aligning.

@@ -17,2 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>to gather in large numbers (of people)</gloss>
-<gloss>to hang out (as a large group)</gloss>
+<gloss>to gather (of people)</gloss>
+<gloss>to assemble</gloss>
+<gloss>to hang out</gloss>

OK. Thanks.

たむろう	        1242
たむろって	17696
屯って	        1496
https://dentsu-ho.com/articles/6072
"渋谷のセンター街などの道端でたむろう若者"
https://iss.ndl.go.jp/books/R100000002-I027129609-00
" 夜の繁華街にたむろう路上の猫たち"
https://realestate.yahoo.co.jp/knowledge/chiebukuro/detail/1127292296/
"社宅の１階で中学生がたむろって迷惑してます"
https://konokikinoshita.themedia.jp/
"コンビニにたむろったまま交通事故に巻き込まれた女子高生"

Not just an expression. But I don't think we need more than one sense. Surprisingly common.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>屯う</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,2 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2151610">屯する・たむろする・1</xref>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2151610">たむろする・1</xref>
@@ -11 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>let's hang out</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to gather in large numbers (of people)</gloss>
+<gloss>to hang out (as a large group)</gloss>

Reopen.

All quiet. I'll make the suggested change, lockit down, then reopen in case there's discussion.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>屯う</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -11,2 +8 @@
-<pos>&v5u;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -14 +9,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -16,11 +11 @@
-<gloss>to gather in large numbers (of people)</gloss>
-<gloss>to hang out (as a large group)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5u;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2151610">屯する・たむろする・2</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<gloss>to assemble (as a military unit or posse)</gloss>
-<gloss>to be quartered (in a particular location)</gloss>
+<gloss>let's hang out</gloss>

GG5: 醸造アルコール distilled alcohol; 〔酒製造工程で加えられた〕 distilled alcohol added to sake.

Fiddling a bit.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>distilled alcohol (esp. that used in some sakes and liqueurs)</gloss>
@@ -13,2 +14 @@
-<gloss>jozo alcohol</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">type of distilled alcohol used in some sakes and liqueurs</gloss>
+<gloss>jōzō alcohol</gloss>

Example: wikipedia uses "brewer's alcohol"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sake
Tokutei meishō-shu refers to premium sake distinguished by the degree to which the rice has been polished and the added percentage of brewer's alcohol or the absence of such additives. 

Commonly used. Google:
"brewer's alcohol" "sake"
"jozo alchohol" "sake"

National Research Institute of Brewing:
https://www.nrib.go.jp/English/sake/esakefaq02.html#04
What is Jozo-alcohol?
Jozo-alcohol is alcohol added in the process of sake making, and in making other liqueurs, such as Umeshu. Jozo-alcohol is made by fermenting...

SAKE 101: Brewer’s Alcohol (Jozo Alcohol)
https://en.sake-times.com/learn/sake-101-brewers-alcohol-jozo-alcohol
Chemically speaking, brewer’s alcohol, or “jozo alcohol” in the industry, is ethanol. It is typically made by distilling crude alcohol derived from fermented sugars or corn to around 95% purity.

https://sakeist.com/dictionary.html#40
Jozo alcohol must be distilled from an alcoholic beverage fermented from raw materials of agricultural origin. The alcohol is distilled like voka to over 95% abv to remove all flavour, before being sold to breweries. And it is stored by the breweries at 30-40% abv to reduce the risk of fire. The main purposes of adding jozo alcohol to fermented moromi are; ・to increase the expression of aromas, especially for ginjo sakes. ・lighter palate of sugar, acidity, umami and body, as well as crisper finish, called kire.

Checked a bottle of sake in the fridge, 醸造アルコール is an ingredient. This is not generic "distilled alcohol", it is a specifically regulated kind of distilled alcohol.

Been reading about sake, the term "brewer's alcohol" appears often, including wikipedia(first ref). As much as I'm not fond of it, "jozo alcohol" is also used commonly online (jōzō, with diacritics, is exceedingly rare).

While in the end ethanol = ethanol, this does appear to be a particular kind. So 醸造アルコール->"Distilled Alcohol" would be a one-way gloss. (note: reverso entries on "distilled alcohol" are *all* about sake production).

"distilled alcohol" is a common gloss, but I feel like a competent translator could still pluck it out of the [expl] if they find it more accessible.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>distilled alcohol (sometimes added in the production of sake)</gloss>
+<gloss>brewer's alcohol</gloss>
+<gloss>jozo alcohol</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">type of distilled alcohol used in some sakes and liqueurs</gloss>

GG5
.
Example:
一方、醸造アルコール（95%アルコール）を添加すると、純米酒とはいえなくなります。た
だ、精米歩合を低くしたのであれば、「純米」という言葉を取り去って、吟醸酒や大吟醸
酒と名乗ることができます。

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1043240">ギロチン</xref>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1043240">ギロチン</xref>

wiki Google

from French

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<field>&film;</field>
+<field>&tv;</field>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1109550">フェードアウト</xref>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>dissolve</gloss>

daijr/s, prog, 研究社 新和英中辞典

チェケラ	 19684   70.3%
ちぇけら	  4441   15.9%
チェケラー  2281   8.2%
ちぇけらー  1575   5.6%
ngrams

Added other variants

@@ -5,0 +6,9 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ちぇけら</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>チェケラー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ちぇけらー</reb>

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2018530">チェキ・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2018530">チェキ・1</xref>

http://q.hatena.ne.jp/1093064047

Bizarre.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2018530">チェキ・2</xref>

http://amiranet.jp/esl/check-it-out/
"チェケラッチョ・チェケラって何？"
https://www.proof0309.com/entry/check-it-out
"チェケラ！は実は英語で「check it out」というスペルのようで
す。"
ngrams

チェケラ	150

https://kotobank.jp/word/赦状-525207

Nikk gives 1880 as the earliest recorded use. Appears to be obsolete.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>

Koj, Daijr/s, etc.

I suspect it's [arch].

赦状	0	0.0%
赦免状	1337	100.0%

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2438250">赦免状</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

daij, koj

Probably archaic.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

Koj, Daijr/s, etc.

赦状	0	0.0%
赦免状	1337	100.0%
赦書	0	0.0%

daijs:
https://kotobank.jp/word/赦書-525195
赦書: 赦免の書状。赦状。
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/赦状/
赦状: 刑罰を許すことを記した書状。赦免状。赦書。

yourei 赦免状: 57 matches
https://yourei.jp/赦免状
赦書: 3 matches
https://yourei.jp/赦書
赦状: 2 matches
https://yourei.jp/赦状

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2438250">赦免状</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

daij, koj

垂れ乳	6441	87.3%
タレ乳	511	6.9%
たれ乳	425	5.8%

I see WWW pages using たれ乳. I'd keep it visible.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

タレ乳	511

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>タレ乳</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I don't think adding a slangy gloss to an entry like this helps.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>sagging boobs</gloss>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>sagging boobs</gloss>

垂れ乳	6441
たれ乳	425
たれちち	69

I don't think it adds anything.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>(male) virginity loss</gloss>

Not sure it's needed.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>(male) virginity loss</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

童貞卒業	15187
童貞卒業します	3804
Tanaka: どーお？童貞卒業した翌朝は気分爽快？ So? Feeling refreshed, the morning after graduating from virginity?

The only sentence for 童貞.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>

No response or objections. Closing.

Reverso (all over the place.)

Suggested reworking. Neither sense is a noun.

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>busy</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>unavailable</gloss>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>impossible to fulfill (demand, request, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>impossible to fulfil (demand, request, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -17,2 +17,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>incompatible (e.g., device)</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>incompatible (e.g. device)</gloss>

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/対応不可
www examples

対応不可	23858

Looks OK. The whole topic makes me feel tired.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/俺TUEEE

I tried to come up with glosses for this a few days ago but I just felt lost. The explanations are all over the place.
I don't think "in a wish-fulfillment story" is necessarily true.
What's the source for "male"? Wiktionary has "Mary Sue (without a gender connotation)".
I'm not sure why sense 2 is adj-f. Niconicopedia defines it as a noun and Wiktionary glosses it as a noun.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>俺TUEEE</keb>
+<keb>俺ＴＵＥＥＥ</keb>
@@ -12,3 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2837549">なろう系</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2837549">なろう系</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2837549">なろう系</xref>
@@ -16 +13 @@
-<gloss>male "Mary Sue" protagonist in a wish-fulfillment story</gloss>
+<gloss>"Mary Sue" protagonist (inexplicably strong or capable character)</gloss>
@@ -19 +16 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -21 +18 @@
-<gloss>overpowered (e.g. in a video game)</gloss>
+<gloss>overpowering weaker opponents for self-satisfaction (in a video game)</gloss>

I'm comfortable with sense 1. Not so sure about sense 2, but to be frank these slangy entries can be rather vague, and it's probably better to have something than nothing at all.

Maybe this shouldn't be an entry if the editors aren't sure of the meaning.

If the "overpowered" meaning is valid, I think it's another sense. I haven't dug into it very far - not my field.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<reb>じぶんのことをたなにあげる</reb>
+<reb>じぶんのことはたなにあげる</reb>

I don't think the あげる forms need to be visible.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

GG5: 自分のことを棚に上げる shut one's eyes to [forget, fail to notice] one's own 「faults [blemish]; do not see the beam in one's own eye
中辞典: 自分のことを棚にあげる ┏shut one's eyes to [be blind to] one's own faults [blemishes, shortcomings]; 《文》 do not see the beam in one's own eye
ルミナス: 彼は自分のことは*棚に上げて人のことを言う He cannot see the beam in his own eye.

Interesting that the JEs all lead their 棚に上げる entries with this extended form. Quite a set phrase.
I think they all can be visible. More plausible ordering.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>自分のことは棚に上げる</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<keb>自分のことは棚に上げる</keb>
+<keb>自分のことは棚にあげる</keb>
@@ -12,5 +14,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>自分のことは棚にあげる</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -25 +22,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2086780">棚に上げる</xref>
@@ -27 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>to ignore one's own shortcomings (when judging others)</gloss>
+<gloss>to ignore one's own shortcomings</gloss>
+<gloss>to shut one's eyes to one's own faults</gloss>

自分の事は棚に	11928	20.9%
自分のことは棚に	22809	39.9%
自分の事を棚に	6593	11.5%
自分のことを棚に	15822	27.7%

I like this little dictionary...
https://takashionary.com/tana-ni-ageru/
(自分のことを/は) 棚たなに上あげる is a Japanese idiom that literally means “put (oneself) up on a shelf” and figuratively means “to behave hypocritically”, just like “the pot calling the kettle black”.
This idiom is used to describes hypocritical behaviour, in which someone criticises others for a fault or mistake that they have themselves.

The poster here *didn't* like "hypocritical", as suggested by his teacher (ちょと違うようにも思います), but I do.
http://www.wa.commufa.jp/~anknak/qa26.htm
When asked for similar idioms, also got the replies:
　・You should practice what you preach.です。
 The pot calls (or called) the kettle black.
Those who live in glass houses should never throw stones. 
 Practice what you preach.
Know your own faults before blaming others for theirs.

I could personally add the biblical quote:
You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye

I don't think any of these idioms belong here (the expression is only half-complete). But this is the flavor.

I believe the underlying entry for 棚に上げる is faulty, in that the glosses act as if they were for *this* entry. Absent a direct object, 棚に上げる can't mean more than "to set aside", "to act as if (an inconvenient truth) does not exist", which is an edit I will make after finishing this entry.

While 棚に上げる is very diverse in what you can ignore (generally some kind of personal shortcoming, but also an inconvenient impediment to a plan you have, etc.), this particular construction is *extremely* common (see ngrams), and is probably the best representative for "棚に上げる".  It's certainly common enough (60,000+ ngrams over its combinations) to be justified here I think.  

sankoku uses this expression as an example (自分のことは棚に上げて、人のせいにする]
daijs uses a similar example:
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/棚に上げる/
自分のことは上げて人の悪口ばかり言う

This is not, however, and idiom with a proper "ending". I think there is no use trying to complete it.

Note, takashionary.com gives a self-effacing use of the expression, acknowledging a certain hypocrisy in what one is about to say:
自分(じぶん)のことは棚に上げて言（い）うけど、彼（かれ）ちょっと太（ふと）りすぎだよね。
I’m saying this by putting myself up on a shelf, but I think he is a bit too fat.

There seems to be something deliberate in the accusation here.  How did your shortcomings/issues/etc *get* on the shelf?  *you* put them there.  棚に上げる currently has "to be blind to one's shortcomings".  But the accusation seems to be that you've (consciously or unconsciously) chosen to ignore your shortcomings.  "to play innocent", I cannot find support for this.  Yes, it is "to act as if one is without fault", but I only see this in the context of judging others.  

The あげる (vs. 上げる) forms are certainly common enough.  [sK] only because all these combinations (事x上げる) seem superfluous (and obvious). Can't get ngrams on the あげる forms because the idiom is too long to have been tallied.

I still wish we could consolidate this の・を・が・は variants into single entries.  Picking は as the most common form (as a basis for *comparison* for hypocritical judgement of someone else). But 自分のことを is also quite common.

Plenty of web results, all about the new law, but I don't think it's worth adding as an entry. Once 2024 arrives, the term will presumably fall out of use pretty quickly.

This could be any problem relating to 2024. I don't think it's much use as a general entry.

https://www.sr-suzuki.jp/2024-problem/

口角を上げ	6,121		
口角をあげ	1,476

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>口角をあげる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

口角泡を飛ばす	1539	1.3% jmdict entry
口角を上げる	3592	2.9%
口角     	117668	95.8%

eij

not quite "to put that frown upside down" but

I think one gloss is sufficient.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>fade</gloss>

KOD: フェード現象 【自動車】 〔ブレーキの〕 (brake) fade.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>break fade</gloss>
+<gloss>brake fade</gloss>

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brake_fade
daijs

Quiet. Closing.

KOD: 純米酢 pure [100%] rice vinegar; vinegar made 「exclusively [100%] from rice.
純米酢	15222

Handy.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

GG5, RP
溶明	320 (cf フェードイン 24039)

強張りが	        1,126	15.3%	
強ばりが	        270	3.7%	
こわばりが	5,976	81.1%

I think "stiffness" should lead.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>stiffness</gloss>
@@ -17 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>stiffness</gloss>

KOD
強張る	7856	6.4%
強ばる	1533	1.3%
こわばる	14799	12.1%
強張り	8287	6.8%
強ばり	2108	1.7%
こわばり	87766	71.7%

Useful, especially for text glossing. Interesting that the kana noun form is so dominant.

I think the majority is against keeping it.

I'd probably support its inclusion if it were from a well-known/oft-quoted verse. But as it's not, I don't think it's worth having.

野 is a productive prefix, and it's recorded as sense 3 of our entry for 野. i don't think it's needed

But if it's in (one or more commobn translations) of the Bible, isn't it worth having? It's not exactly an obscure piece of text. I think it's mildly useful.

I don't mind dropping it.

Resubmit with references.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<gloss>Christmas swag</gloss>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<gloss>Christmas swag</gloss>

Lots of pages says it's from German, e.g: 
https://www.etsy.com/uk/listing/1427767485/posy-of-dried-flowers-swag-hanging-bunch   "Swag means "wall decoration" in German."

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>swag (wall decoration)</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="ger"/>
+<gloss>swag (wall decoration of flowers, leaves, etc.)</gloss>

https://tsuchikaze.jp/blogs/dryflower/beginner
https://shokubutsuseikatsu.jp/article/news/p/2640/
https://minne.com/mag/articles/2322
https://search.rakuten.co.jp/search/mall/スワッグ/
https://hitohana.tokyo/swag

ngrams
スワッグ	9931

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>changing the flavor of a dish in the middle of a meal by adding flavorings</gloss>
+<gloss>changing the flavor of a dish in the middle of a meal by adding condiments, seasoning, etc.</gloss>

Yes, [col].

Also in jitsuyou. Refs all say "俗"

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

Sankoku, Daijirin, Daijisen

Came across in conversation with family recently. 865 n-gram count for 味変 seems low, but common on social media (https://twitter.com/search?q=味変&src=typed_query&f=live), and turning up in news segments (https://youtu.be/GTmzzb38UG4?si=MXEbx5R8YjD-xNhT&t=258)

Oops.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ファース・トシューズ</reb>
+<reb>ファースト・シューズ</reb>

ファーストシューズ	29799
セカンドシューズ	1311

レイプ魔	12,496		
強姦魔	22,468

Not in the refs but pretty common.

GG5, etc.
遵法精神	8649

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_Business_(1989_film)

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>Family Business (film)</gloss>
+<gloss>Family Business (1989 film)</gloss>

KOD