The "on" in that sentence comes from では. I think "just for" is too context-specific.

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>just for</gloss>
-<gloss>just on</gloss>
+<gloss>just</gloss>
+<gloss>solely</gloss>

koj has 「―‐ワン」 as an example but daij both say sth like 名詞の下に付けて...

GG5 examples:
会社オンリーの人生 a life lived only for the company.
仕事オンリーの人 a person who lives just for his work
これからの流行歌手は歌オンリーではだめだ. Future popular singers won't make the grade just on singing ability.

The examples certainly lookas though it's a suffix. In English it's both an adjective and an adverb, not that very relevant here.

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>just for</gloss>
+<gloss>just on</gloss>

Is suf really right for sense 1? I don't like it

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

gg5, daij
キャスティング	615,347	99.9%	
キャスチング	429	0.1%

Merging 2466370. キャスチング is in daijr/s but it's so rare that I think it's best hidden. Possible rk candidate.

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キャスチング</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +14,5 @@
+<gloss>casting (of roles)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&fish;</field>

GG5 has both "trolling" and "trawling" but all the other refs (JEs and kokugos) only have the former. I can't find any other support for "trawling".

@@ -9,4 +9 @@
-<gloss>trawling</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&fish;</field>

daijs: 多く複合語の形で用い、初めての、未使用の、また、純粋の、などの意を表す。「―スノー」「―シルバー」

Daijs and koj have a separate sense.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1342440">処女・1</xref>
@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>virginity</gloss>
@@ -17,2 +18,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>virginity</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<gloss>virgin (e.g. snow)</gloss>
+<gloss>unspoiled</gloss>
+<gloss>pure</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーーーー─┬────────╮
│ バージンロード　　　　 │ 54,766 │
│ バージンオイル　　　　 │ 13,425 │
│ バージンオリーブオイル │ 10,972 │
│ バージン諸島　　　　　 │  5,945 │
│ バージンスノー　　　　 │  1,596 │
│ バージンオリーブ　　　 │  1,176 │
├─ーーーーーーーーーーー─┼────────┤
│ バージンの　　　　　　 │  5,581 │
│ バージンな　　　　　　 │  1,728 │
╰─ーーーーーーーーーーー─┴────────╯

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>

ルミナス

e.g. バージンをあげる

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>virginity</gloss>

gg5

gg5

@@ -10 +10,3 @@
-<gloss>misleading</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>misleading (someone)</gloss>
+<gloss>manipulation (e.g. of public opinion)</gloss>

gg5

->noun

@@ -10,1 +10,1 @@
-<gloss>mislead</gloss>
+<gloss>misleading</gloss>

google hits for ミスリードする etc.

@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

I think we can merge senses 2 and 3. The refs don't have a "device" sense.
I don't think the x-ref on sense 1 is needed.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
@@ -15 +13,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2406570">食品メーカー</xref>
@@ -23,5 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>maker</gloss>
-<gloss>device for making things</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -29 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>person who creates things</gloss>
+<s_inf>in compounds</s_inf>
+<gloss>maker (person or device that makes something)</gloss>

Swapping order of senses 2 and 3.
I think it's better to have a wasei term for the x-ref on sense 3.
Changed "makes or does" to "creates". I think that's broad enough.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>producer</gloss>
@@ -18,5 +18,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1085950">トラブルメーカー</xref>
-<gloss>person who makes or does things</gloss>
@@ -29,0 +26,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2844481">チャンスメーカー</xref>
+<gloss>person who creates things</gloss>
+</sense>

Daijr (sense 1): 製造業者。特に、有名・大手の製造会社。 
(sense 2): つくり出す人の意で、外来語に付いて複合語をつくる。 「チャンス━−」 「トラブル━−」

Just one sense doesn't really cover all the uses of the term.

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>manufacturer</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2406570">食品メーカー</xref>
+<gloss>manufacturer (esp. a major company)</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +19,11 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1085950">トラブルメーカー</xref>
+<gloss>person who makes or does things</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2152950">コーヒーメーカー</xref>
+<gloss>maker</gloss>
+<gloss>device for making things</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, prog, luminous, daij, meikyo

Indeed.
I think only sense 3 would be written as １点.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>point</gloss>
+<gloss>dot</gloss>
@@ -20,5 +23,24 @@
-<gloss>dot</gloss>
-<gloss>point</gloss>
-<gloss>only a little</gloss>
-<gloss>particle</gloss>
-<gloss>only one</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>one point</gloss>
+<gloss>one matter</gloss>
+<gloss>one detail</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>one point (in a game, exam, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>one mark</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>one item</gloss>
+<gloss>one article</gloss>
+<gloss>one piece</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>with neg. sentence</s_inf>
+<gloss>slightest bit</gloss>
+<gloss>trace</gloss>
+<gloss>speck</gloss>

I think this should be split into 2 or 3 senses

Tanaka

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>１点</keb>

@@ -31,0 +32 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -33 +33,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 一日中　　　　 │ 1,516,563 │ 99.0% │
│ 一日じゅう　　 │    12,436 │  0.8% │
│ 一日ぢゅう　　 │        47 │  0.0% │
│ いちにちじゅう │     2,329 │  0.2% │
│ いちにちぢゅう │        32 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

Removing restrictions and adding sK/sk tags

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22,4 +23,0 @@
-<re_restr>一日中</re_restr>
-<re_restr>１日中</re_restr>
-<re_restr>一日じゅう</re_restr>
-<re_restr>１日じゅう</re_restr>
@@ -30,3 +28 @@
-<re_restr>一日中</re_restr>
-<re_restr>１日中</re_restr>
-<re_restr>一日ぢゅう</re_restr>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -36 +36 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>five-household neighborhood unit (for mutual aid, self-protection, etc.) (Edo period)</gloss>
+<gloss>five-household neighborhood unit (for mutual aid, self-protection, etc.; Edo period)</gloss>

GG5: 〔江戸時代の〕 a five-household neighborhood unit of the Tokugawa period.
Koj, Daijr/s

Also "The Five" Russian composers.

@@ -22,4 +22,2 @@
-<misc>&hist;</misc>
-<gloss>a primitive policing system where peasants were communally responsible for others in their "group" (which did not necessarily number five people)</gloss>
-<gloss>frankpledge</gloss>
-<gloss>tithing</gloss>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>five-household neighborhood unit (for mutual aid, self-protection, etc.) (Edo period)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/五人組_(日本史)

frankpledge and tithing are olde tyme English words for the same thing; not sure how many people would actually search for it but seems harmless to throw them in

@@ -19,0 +20,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>a primitive policing system where peasants were communally responsible for others in their "group" (which did not necessarily number five people)</gloss>
+<gloss>frankpledge</gloss>
+<gloss>tithing</gloss>
+</sense>

Meikyo and sankoku have sense 1 as transitive only.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -28,0 +31 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog, daij

Sense 2 is always preceded by お.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>interference</gloss>
@@ -29 +30,2 @@
-<gloss>to visit (somebody's home)</gloss>
+<s_inf>as お〜</s_inf>
+<gloss>to visit (someone's home)</gloss>

gg5
助け起こす	3,477		
助け起こし	6,204	
助け起し	        316

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>助け起す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>to help up</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to help (someone) to their feet</gloss>
+<gloss>to help (someone) up</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 沖釣　　 │  2,280 │  2.9% │
│ 沖釣り　 │ 75,709 │ 96.5% │ - move up
│ 沖づり　 │    389 │  0.5% │ - add, sK
│ おき釣り │     26 │  0.0% │
│ おきづり │     21 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>沖釣り</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11,2 @@
-<keb>沖釣り</keb>
+<keb>沖づり</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +19 @@
+<field>&fish;</field>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>puppet theatre</gloss>
+<gloss>Japanese puppet theatre</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 操り浄瑠璃　　 │    326 │ 74.9% │ - daijr/s
│ 操浄瑠璃　　　 │     88 │ 20.2% │ - koj
│ あやつり浄瑠璃 │     21 │  4.8% │
├─ーーーーーーー─┼────────┼───────┤
│ 操り芝居　　　 │    831 │  N/A  │
│ 人形浄瑠璃　　 │ 44,699 │  N/A  │ - adding xref
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>操浄瑠璃</keb>
+<keb>操り浄瑠璃</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>操り浄瑠璃</keb>
+<keb>操浄瑠璃</keb>
@@ -15 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>old name for the bunraku</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1637390">人形浄瑠璃</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>puppet theatre</gloss>

daij, koj

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>forearm protector</gloss>
+<gloss>forearm guard (made of thin metal plates)</gloss>

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

Koj, etc.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1221690">気になる・1</xref>
@@ -18 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>to be worried about (something)</gloss>
+<gloss>to worry one</gloss>
+<gloss>to be concerned about</gloss>

Fixing part-of-speech tags

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -15,2 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>

G n-grams:

気に掛かる	18143
気にかかる	102369

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>気に掛かる</keb>
+<keb>気にかかる</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>気にかかる</keb>
+<keb>気に掛かる</keb>

Currently all our internet slang terms for major companies/websites are in jmdict.
This one is more than I would have guessed, at least judging from Twitter.

@@ -22,2 +22,2 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
-<gloss>amazon.com</gloss>
+<misc>&net-sl;</misc>
+<gloss>Amazon (online retailer)</gloss>

Should [2] go to the name dictionary?

Ho ho.

http://dic.nicovideo.jp/a/密林
http://www.google.com/search?q=密林+amazon

@@ -20,0 +20,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<gloss>amazon.com</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, prog, daij, koj

@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1680120">抜錨</xref>
+<gloss>anchoring</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>casting anchor</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

助け起こす	3,477	<- in jmdict
助け起こし	6,204

Not even worth merging with 助け起こす.

扶け起こす	27

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ お邪魔虫　　 │ 24,848 │ 61.7% │
│ おじゃま虫　 │ 12,561 │ 31.2% │ - adding
│ 御邪魔虫　　 │    175 │  0.4% │ - rK (daijr/s, koj, shinmeikai)
│ おじゃまむし │  2,684 │  6.7% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>おじゃま虫</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>someone who gets in the way without serving any useful purpose</gloss>
-<gloss>fly in the ointment</gloss>
+<gloss>interferer</gloss>
+<gloss>meddler</gloss>
@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>third wheel</gloss>

やり逃げ	9554	43.2%
遣り逃げ	45	0.2%
ヤリ逃げ	3805	17.2%
やりにげ	8561	38.7%
ヤリニゲ	136	0.6%
ヤリにげ	23	0.1%

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>ヤリ逃げ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

hits

removed " (esp. after telling her that you love her)", felt 
overly detailed. 現代用語の基礎知識 for example just says
"男がセックスをした相手の女性とすぐうまく別れること。騙して捨てること。"
_
this word can also be used in a non-sexual way too, 
apparently, though it's not in any dictionary (saw it on TV 
today and confirmed it with a native speaker)

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>遣り逃げ</keb>
+<keb>やり逃げ</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<keb>やり逃げ</keb>
+<keb>遣り逃げ</keb>
@@ -17,1 +17,1 @@
-<gloss>having sex with a woman and then breaking off contact with her (esp. after telling her that you love her)</gloss>
+<gloss>breaking off contact with someone after having sex with them</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

i think it should be kept since it's the primary usage.  but perhaps transferred to a note.  it could also be shortened

@@ -21,0 +21,1 @@
+<s_inf>suru and itasu verb forms are used as set phrases said prior to entering or leaving someone's home</s_inf>
@@ -22,1 +23,1 @@
-<gloss>intrusion (suru and itasu verb forms are used as set phrases said prior to entering or leaving someone's home)</gloss>
+<gloss>intrusion</gloss>

Rene put in that gloss, so I'll let him comment.
I think an xref will suffice.

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1002050">お邪魔します・おじゃまします</xref>

current gloss feels a bit unwieldy..?

Merged with 1041340.

Entry created

引き釣りし	440		
引き釣りをし	375	
---
引き釣りで	1,456		
引き釣りを	1,110				
引きづりで	0		
引きづりを	25

Not vs in my refs.
The high 引きづり count is coming almost entirely from 引きづる, an irregular spelling of 引きずる.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>引きづり</keb>
@@ -23,2 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>

[vi]: sankoku

〈引（き）／ひき／ヒキ〉〈釣（り）／づり／ヅリ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 引き釣り │ 13,033 │ 48.3% │
│ 引きづり │  9,995 │ 37.0% │ - add
│ 引き釣　 │  1,156 │  4.3% │ - sK
│ 引釣り　 │    606 │  2.2% │ - sK
│ ひき釣り │     99 │  0.4% │
│ 引きヅリ │     76 │  0.3% │
│ ヒキ釣り │     40 │  0.1% │
│ 引づり　 │     32 │  0.1% │
│ ひき釣　 │     30 │  0.1% │
│ 引釣　　 │      0 │  0.0% │ - drop
│ ひきづり │  1,924 │  7.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>引釣り</keb>
+<keb>引きづり</keb>
@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<keb>引釣</keb>
+<keb>引釣り</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22 +24,3 @@
-<gloss>trolling (fishing)</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<field>&fish;</field>
+<gloss>trolling</gloss>

enwiki has this kind of disambig too

@@ -22,1 +22,1 @@
-<gloss>trolling</gloss>
+<gloss>trolling (fishing)</gloss>

daij, gg5, prog

gg5 has as 'trolling', prog has as 'trawling'.  from the daijs definition, gg5 appears to be correct

See comments on deleted 2858839.

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アンカーリング</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

KOD追加語彙, daijr/s

Splitting on source word.

@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>アンカーリング</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -12 +9 @@
-<gloss>anchoring (cognitive bias)</gloss>
+<gloss>anchoring (of a vessel)</gloss>
@@ -16,2 +13,11 @@
-<s_inf>usu. アンカーリング</s_inf>
-<gloss>anchor ring</gloss>
+<field>&golf;</field>
+<gloss>anchoring (the club)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&psych;</field>
+<gloss>anchoring (effect)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>anchoring (neuro-linguistic programming technique)</gloss>

G n-grams:
アンカリング	11758
アンカーリング	3759

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アンカーリング</reb>
@@ -12,0 +16 @@
+<s_inf>usu. アンカーリング</s_inf>

wiki for (1), http://loop.air-nifty.com/log/2008/02/post_fa98.html for (2)

一溜まり	        2,511	5.4%	
一溜り	        633	1.4%	
一たまり	        2,013	4.4%	
ひと溜まり	48	0.1%	
ひとたまり	41,016	88.7%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Simplifying

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<s_inf>usu. as ひとたまりもない or ひとたまりもなく</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. as 〜もない or 〜もなく</s_inf>

daijr, koj

We should have the non-negated form.

daijs

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>misleading</gloss>
+<gloss>misleading (someone)</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>manipulation (e.g. of public opinion)</gloss>

[vt]: sankoku

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

G n-grams: 2956

Only in daijs.

@@ -13 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>mislead</gloss>
+<gloss>misleading</gloss>
+<gloss>misdirecting</gloss>
+<gloss>leading astray</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/誤導/

I agree.
I think [chn] is best kept for children's language, and if there enough cases to warrant it another tag created for "used by parents, ...".

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<misc>&chn;</misc>
+<s_inf>used by parents, guardians, etc.</s_inf>

I wasn't familiar with this use of the word but after reading various online discussions about it, my impression is that it's not used by children at all. I think we should indicate this in some way or another if we're tagging it as children's language. Maybe something simple like "used by parents, guardians, etc."

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>child (one doesn't know)</gloss>
+<gloss>child (one does not know)</gloss>

Closing for now.

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<s_inf>used when speaking to one's child or a child under one's care</s_inf>

I think [chn] should include words used by adults when speaking to children. I mean kids only say あんよ etc. because that's what their parents use those words with them. I'm sure some toddlers pick up on this to some extent too. I don't really think the note is necessary.

Sense 2 is quite tricky to explain. I don't think children use the word in this way. Is [chn] still applicable here?

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>お友だち</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>child (that one does not know)</gloss>
+<s_inf>used when speaking to one's child or a child under one's care</s_inf>
+<gloss>child (one doesn't know)</gloss>
+<gloss>another child</gloss>

rejecting this branch

ブリタニカ国際大百科事典:

車輪窓[しゃりんまど]
「ばら窓」のページをご覧ください。

ばら窓[ばらまど]
rose window

therefore, matching only gloss at ばら窓. i guess a rose window is a kind of circular window?

建築用語。車輪窓とも呼ばれる。

the reference is the research, i think. much (or most) of the dictionary was compiled by cross-referencing various word lists against dictionaries and encyclopedias

i'd only summarily reject submissions with no reference

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2858832">ばら窓</xref>
+<field>&archit;</field>
@@ -13 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>circular window</gloss>

It's not difficult to make a list of words in gg5, nikkoku, etc. that aren't in JMdict.

Without doing the homework, the odds of entering inaccurate or misleading info are high.
The odds of these obsolete terms being useful to anyone are low.

I think it'd be better if submissions like this without any stated motivation or research were summarily deleted.

車輪窓	21

Not sure it's needed.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>circular window</gloss>

研究社 リーダーズ英和辞典 第３版; 世界大百科事典第二版

Mentioned in Sekai.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2858832">ばら窓</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2858832">バラ窓</xref>
@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>wheel window</gloss>

ブリタニカ国際大百科事典:

車輪窓[しゃりんまど]
「ばら窓」のページをご覧ください。

ばら窓[ばらまど]
rose window
建築用語。車輪窓とも呼ばれる。

therefore, matching only gloss at ばら窓. i guess a rose window is a kind of circular window?

the reference is the research, i think. it doesn't seem like there was really anything wrong with the original submission, except maybe a couple of tags and a cross-reference were missing.

much (or most) of the dictionary was compiled by cross-referencing various word lists against dictionaries and encyclopedias. between 2007 and 2020, i submitted thousands of entries from various word lists and random things i was reading, cross-referenced against dictionaries.

arbitrary cruft is no good, but this submission is a headword in britannica

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2858832">ばら窓</xref>
+<field>&archit;</field>
@@ -13 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>circular window</gloss>

I also don't think there's necessarily an issue with having entries like these.
My problem is a combination of two things.

1. Someone is randomly selecting obsolete words from old dictionaries and encyclopedias to submit. Notice how five "輪" words (操縦輪, 玉輪, 車輪窓, 輪癬, 輪講会) all arrived at the same time.
2. No research is provided regarding the role of the word in contemporary Japanese. Someone else has to go investigate it. I don't think these old references can be safely taken at face value.

I wouldn't raise a fuss if either of these two points were addressed.
If we really want to decide which words to investigate by throwing a dart at a list, I'd be happy to put together a list of words from smaller Reiwa-era dictionaries (sankoku, shinmeikai, iwakoku) that aren't in JMdict.

It has an entry in Brit ("see ばら窓") and is mentioned in its and sekai daihyakka jiten's ばら窓 entries. I don't think we have to worry about the meaning being misconstrued here. I don't think there's an issue with having entries like these (though I think there's a lot of [arch] stuff that could be thrown out).

It's not difficult to make a list of words in gg5, nikkoku, etc. that aren't in JMdict.

Without doing the homework, the odds of entering inaccurate or misleading info are high.
The odds of these obsolete terms being useful to anyone are low.

I think it'd be better if submissions like this without any stated motivation or research were summarily deleted.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<field>&archit;</field>

ばら窓	223	2.8%
バラ窓	5546	68.5%
薔薇窓	2333	28.8%

gg5 brit sekai

gg5, luminous, meikyo, smk

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>grieving all day</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to spend one's days in grief</gloss>
+<gloss>to grieve away one's days</gloss>
+<gloss>to grieve all day</gloss>

三省堂　スーパー大辞林; 研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

It's specifically an article. I think we should lead with this gloss.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>article based on unconfirmed reports</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>unconfirmed report</gloss>

KOD: an 「unconfirmed [unsubstantiated] story; an article based on unconfirmed reports.

unsubstantiated is probably better than speculative.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>speculative news story</gloss>
+<gloss>unsubstantiated news story</gloss>

sankoku (entry for 飛ばし):
  きちんとした根拠のない情報にもとづく記事。
daijirin:
  事実であることを確認しないで書かれた記事。飛ばし。

jitsuyou also has a lengthy explanation. Rather than outright fake or bogus news stories, it sounds like this often refers to stories based upon sources that the journalist trusts but cannot reveal.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 飛ばし記事 │ 5,511 │ 88.7% │
│ トバシ記事 │   414 │  6.7% │
│ とばし記事 │   262 │  4.2% │
│ とばしきじ │    28 │  0.5% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

gg5, prog, luminous, daij
投げ釣り	180,365	93.6%	
投釣り	5,204	2.7%	
投げ釣	5,229	2.7%	
投釣	1,799	0.9%

紅芋タルト	6834	44.7%
紅いもタルト	8456	55.3%

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>紅いもタルト</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>Beniimo Tart</gloss>
+<field>&food;</field>
+<gloss>beniimo tart (tart made with purple sweet potatoes)</gloss>

https://glocals-y.com/okinawa-souvenir-english/

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
紅芋タルト	6834

(I heardthis used IRL before making this entry suggestion, btw. 今でもマスクしてるのは本物のマスカーだな or something like that)

https://twitter.com/search?q=マスカー&src=typed_query

Probably.derog?

daijr/s, eij

Plenty of web hits.

My only concern is that アンカーリング may more often be アンカー + リング than an alternative spelling of アンカリング. That being said, it's not a particularly common form so it's unlikely to cause many problems. I'll remerge as suggested (minus アンカー・リング).

Probably best to put these forms into 2831059 as [sk] and drop this entry.

Just noting that daijirin has a 〔アンカーリングとも〕 note on its golf sense for アンカリング.
A web search for "アンカーリング" "ゴルフ" gets a handful of hits.

Reopening this for further discussion. I'm in favour of dropping it.

gg5, daijr, RP