だらし無い	1499	0.7% <- in Koj but not other kokugos.
だらしない	213734	99.3%

I guess we can here.

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I think we can hide 無い kanji in general? ie make them sK

@@ -7 +6,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>

No comments. I'm switching this back to the previous version.

@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<gloss>(of one's outer appearance) untidy</gloss>
-<gloss>slovenly</gloss>
+<gloss>slovenly (appearance, work, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -19,12 +18,4 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>(of one's inner quality, morals) loose</gloss>
-<gloss>immoral</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>(of one's behavior, work) careless</gloss>
-<gloss>sloppy</gloss>
+<gloss>untidy</gloss>
+<gloss>undisciplined</gloss>
+<gloss>careless</gloss>
+<gloss>loose</gloss>
@@ -32 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>slipshod</gloss>

We agreed in 2018 to go with 2 senses, in line with most references. I don't think this expansion is particularly useful.

gg5, prog

@@ -18,0 +19,6 @@
+<gloss>while (one is at it)</gloss>
+<gloss>when</gloss>
+<gloss>on the occasion of</gloss>
+<gloss>at the same time (as)</gloss>
+<gloss>on one's way (to)</gloss>
+<gloss>by the way</gloss>
@@ -20,2 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>taking the opportunity</gloss>
-<gloss>while one is at it</gloss>
@@ -23 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>on the occasion</gloss>

Removing freq tag from rK form.

@@ -7 +6,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>

GG5 (has "while one is at it".)

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>in passing</gloss>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>while (you) are at it</gloss>
+<gloss>while one is at it</gloss>

daij, koj

Style alignment.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>フロント・エンド</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2318930">バックエンド・1</xref>
@@ -10,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>front-end (processor)</gloss>
-<gloss>FEP</gloss>
+<gloss>frontend</gloss>
+<gloss>front end</gloss>

いずかた and いずち are tagged as 雅 in smk. I think they should be separate [poet] entries. I'll set it up.
I don't think we should ever use sk for ok readings like this. They're not variant forms; they're separate archaic words. I think they can be dropped. I think ok reading that we want to keep should be separate arch-tagged entries.

@@ -15,18 +14,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>いずかた</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>いずち</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>どち</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>いずし</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>なにざま</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

何方	127545
孰方	0
どちら	18952856
いず方	186
いずかた	467

The [ichi1] can come off the 何方 form - it's not in the IchiMan source document.
孰方 gets 0 n-grams and is not in references - I think it can be dropped.
For いずかた, GG5 has a separate entry and uses いず方 in examples with the 《文》 tag.  Perhaps it should go in its own [rare][form[ entry.
Although they're in the kokugos, I think the rare "ok]" readings can be hidden.

@@ -7,5 +6,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>孰方</keb>
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -42 +42,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1483185">あちら・1</xref>

Most JEs lead with enjoyment.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>reception (of a right, privilege, rank, etc.) resulting in satisfaction</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>reception (of a right, privilege, rank, etc.)</gloss>

三省堂国語辞典　第八版
新明解国語辞典　第八版

Added the implication of satisfaction/enjoyment for the first gloss with a few examples, sounds a bit awkward though. 
Replaced peace with beauty as it seems more relevant for the second gloss.

@@ -18,2 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>reception</gloss>
-<gloss>enjoyment (of freedom, peace, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>reception (of a right, privilege, rank, etc.) resulting in satisfaction</gloss>
+<gloss>enjoyment (of freedom, beauty, etc.)</gloss>

gg5, chujiten, daij

@@ -19,3 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>acceptance</gloss>
-<gloss>enjoyment</gloss>
-<gloss>being given</gloss>
+<gloss>enjoyment (of freedom, peace, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>having</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Of course.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 屈指　 │ 855,274 │
│ 屈指の │ 809,398 │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────╯

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Our entries:

甲乙丙丁
【 こうおつへいてい 】
1.	[n]
▶ A, B, C and D
▶ first, second, third and fourth

甲乙
[1][n]
  first and second; A and B

Any reason this should *not* be glossed in the same way as we gloss 甲乙 and 甲乙丙丁?

It might be nice to have an editorial policy on the oxford comma, at least to know a preference moving forward. (Maybe we don't want to edit existing entries just over this...)

I usually include it, but have left it out for consistency with the related entries.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>ABC</gloss>
-<gloss>1, 2 and 3</gloss>
+<gloss>A, B and C</gloss>
+<gloss>first, second and third</gloss>

https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Part-Of-Speech_(POS)_Issues

Thanks. I've tweaked the editorial policy to reflect this.

gg5, luminous, wisdom
重要を	1,532	2.8%	
重要さを	52,991	97.2%	
---
の重要が	        584	5.5%	
の重要さが	10,018	94.5%

In meikyo it's 形動 only. We sometimes drop "n" if one or more of the kokugos has the word as 形動 only and its use as a noun is rare. I think it's OK to do here.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>momentous</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +20,3 @@
+<gloss>significant</gloss>
+<gloss>major</gloss>
+<gloss>key</gloss>
@@ -22 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>major</gloss>

重要	29761919
重要な	11874488
重要が	3377
重要さ	112721
Daijr: （名・形動）[文]ナリ
Daijs: ［名・形動］

Although this is almost invariably an adjective, the kokugos (as usual) label it as a noun as well. That's part of the reason we have stuck with "adj-na,n".  I wouldn't really mind dropping the "n" in these cases but I'd like it to be generally agreed among editors and contributors that walking away from the "名・形動" is the best path.

See for example, 完ぺき [adj-n] and 完ぺきさ[n]
The noun is 重要さ, right?
重要さ	112721

sankoku:形動ダ

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&mil;</field>

daijs: 軍隊がある土地ながくとどまっていること

https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/駐屯

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=駐屯
army post
garrison
military post
post《軍事》
station《軍事》

 garrisoning
provide (a place) with a group of troops.
　　　"air reconnaissance showed the Germans had not garrisoned the island"
station (troops) in a particular place.
　　　"French troops were garrisoned at Phillipsburg"

daijs says [軍], reverso is remarkably consistent with "stationing".  "occupancy" never comes up. "garrisoning" is used sometimes, and is perhaps a useful synonym(though I could take it or leave it). 

占領軍(occupying army), 占領 is "occupation/to occupy", so it doesn't seem necessary to try and stretch this entry into "occupation".

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<field>&mil;</field>
@@ -19 +20 @@
-<gloss>occupancy</gloss>
+<gloss>garrisoning</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

No worries.

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<field>&Buddh;</field>

https://i.imgur.com/5I67fCQ.png

I'm sorry then, I might have misunderstood what I was reading and jumped to the wrong conclusion. I was because of that passage above I've read in a game, but reading the dictionary more carefully, I see now is not specifically Buddhist terminology.  Feel free to revert it back to the state before my previous suggestions, apologies ^_^'

I guess it's not specifically Buddhist terminology.

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<field>&Buddh;</field>

I think this should be tagged as associated to Buddhism, right?

gg5, prog, luminous, daij
いれ込む	261

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>いれ込む</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -17,2 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>to put in</gloss>
-<gloss>to place inside</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>to pack into</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +28,3 @@
-<gloss>to be enthusiastic</gloss>
-<gloss>to be engrossed</gloss>
+<gloss>to be enthusiastic (about)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be crazy (about)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be obsessed (with)</gloss>
@@ -31,2 +35,2 @@
-<gloss>to be in high spirits</gloss>
-<gloss>to be excited</gloss>
+<gloss>to get excited</gloss>
+<gloss>to be stirred up</gloss>

iwakoku, shinsen, and obunsha say the first sense specifically is [vt]

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 入れ込む │ 45,449 │ 94.6% │
│ 入れこむ │  1,254 │  2.6% │ - add, sK
│ いれこむ │  1,358 │  2.8% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>入れこむ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<xref type="see">ネスティング・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1092910">ネスティング・2</xref>

The computing sense of ネスティング in daijirin mentions 入れ子.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ネスティング

Doesn't necessarily have to be a loop.

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<xref type="see">ネスティング・2</xref>
@@ -26 +27 @@
-<gloss>nested loop</gloss>
+<gloss>nested structure</gloss>

https://www.iplab.cs.tsukuba.ac.jp/~shin/evo/3/7/9.html

@@ -20,0 +21,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>入れ子</stagk>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>nested loop</gloss>

Iwakoku says our sense [3] is 既に古風.

I think we usually avoid referring to glosses within other glosses ("child adopted in this manner")

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
@@ -26 +27 @@
-<gloss>child adopted in this manner</gloss>
+<gloss>child adopted by a parent of a deceased child</gloss>

Sense 2 needed more; just romaji is useless.
Probably [poet] for sense 3.

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss>haikai no renga</gloss>
+<gloss>haikai no renga (humorous, often vulgar style of renga which emerged in the 16th century)</gloss>
@@ -31 +31 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&poet;</misc>

daijs defn for 俳諧
https://kotobank.jp/word/俳諧-112719
１ こっけい。おかしみ。たわむれ。
２ 俳句（発句ほっく）・連句および俳文などの総称。
３ 「俳諧の連歌」の略。
４ 「俳諧歌はいかいか」の略。

俳諧	86437	98.2%
正統の連歌	0	0.0%  (orthodox renga, used in wikipedia, not common)
俳諧の連歌	590	0.7%
俳諧連歌	993	1.1%

Depending on opinions on my edit to 俳諧の連歌, not sure what you'd actually want to do with [2]. 

Seems [2] should be [hist] (limited to discussion of poetry development). Outside of historical discussion, one would probably assume [1].

I'm not sure [3] is actually archaic. (wiktionary only gives the poetic sense, not in sankoku)  But it's elucidating to have one way or the other. Definitely in daijs as the first entry.

@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1559370">連歌</xref>
@@ -28 +27,8 @@
-<gloss>humorous or vulgar renga poetry</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>haikai no renga</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>absurd</gloss>
+<gloss>comical</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| 俳諧　　 | 86,437 | 98.2% |
| 誹諧　　 |  1,611 |  1.8% | <- daijr/s, koj, mk, etc.
| はいかい | 14,614 |  N/A  |

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -19,2 +19 @@
-<gloss>haikai</gloss>
-<gloss>collective name for haiku, haibun, haiga, senryū, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>haikai (collective name for haiku, haibun, haiga, senryū, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +24 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1559370">連歌</xref>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<reb>ふつとん</reb>
+<reb>ふつトン</reb>
@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>tonne</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/仏噸・仏屯-2080107
ふつ‐トン【仏噸・仏屯】

Added メートルトン as a better xref, to eventually get you to トン, which should be used unless reasonable ambiguity is possible.

仏屯 is actually quite rare, probably due to this redundancy, and also the rise of メートルトン before the kanji reforms(噸->屯)

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>仏トン</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,7 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>仏屯</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +22,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2858705">メートルトン</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

I'd keep it, but I'm not fussed.

綺麗	17,699,590	37.3%	
奇麗	450,589	        0.9%	
きれい	17,905,902	37.7%	
キレイ	11,415,577	24.0%
----
Aozora Bunko:
綺麗     5867
奇麗     917

If rK is meant to indicate that the form isn't worth learning, I don't think it should be used for 奇麗. With an n-gram count of nearly half a million (almost spec2), it's a form that learners should probably be aware of. Also, for whatever reason, it's the only kanji form in prog and wisdom.

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -10,2 +9,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -20 +17,0 @@
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -46 +43 @@
-<s_inf>as きれいに</s_inf>
+<s_inf>as 〜に</s_inf>

sense 1
綺麗な子	21917	55.0%
きれいな子	11301	28.3%
キレイな子	6663	16.7%

綺麗な人　	100016	50.3%
きれいな人	59967	30.2%
キレイな人	38762	19.5%


綺麗な花 	159938	50.3%
きれいな花	132221	41.6%
キレイな花	25716	8.1%

綺麗な景色	57995	48.5%
きれいな景色	41394	34.6%
キレイな景色	20177	16.9%

(not really uk!)


sense 2
部屋を綺麗	12575	26.6%
部屋をきれい	15049	31.8%
部屋をキレイ	19656	41.6%


綺麗にしなさい	577	12.0%
キレイにしなさい	267	5.6%
きれいにしなさい	3950	82.4%




sense 3
綺麗に忘れ	2508	29.5%
きれいに忘れ	4244	49.9%
キレイに忘れ	1698	20.0%
綺麗にわすれ	0	0.0%
きれいにわすれ	47	0.6%
キレイにわすれ	0	0.0%

(I think this qualifies for sense 3 too?)
きれいさっぱり	70139	75.2%
キレイさっぱり	22014	23.6%
奇麗さっぱり	1104	1.2%

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14 +15 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -28 +28,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

Merge with  2036440  英トン

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>ton (long, British)</gloss>
+<gloss>long ton</gloss>
+<gloss>British ton</gloss>

Sankoku and meikyo also have the IT sense

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 脆弱性　　　　 │ 738,294 │ 97.1% │
│ ぜい弱性　　　 │  22,303 │  2.9% │ - sK
│ ぜいじゃくせい │   2,391 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>security hole</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/脆弱性/#jn-121751

@@ -18,0 +19,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>vulnerability</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5 eij
G n-grams:
 脆弱性   	738294
 ぜい弱性 	 22303
 ぜいじゃくせい	  2391

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>weakness</gloss>
+<gloss>fragility</gloss>

KM n-grams:
脆弱性	19183
ぜい弱性	233

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ぜい弱性</keb>

I think it can go. No evidence it's used in Japanese.

Good definition of the Chinese term:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/chinese-traditional-english/升遷
the act of raising someone to a higher or more important position or rank:
Did Steve get/Was Steve given the promotion he wanted?

https://kotobank.jp/word/升遷-2831636
【升遷】しようせん 昇任する

https://kotobank.jp/word/陞遷-2832324
陞遷 しようせん 栄転。

0 ngrams.　Chinese. 6 google book results for "升遷し"

Book results appear to be about career advancement (rising in rank, ascending to a position, etc.).

The ref in kotobank. I have says しようせん (not しょうせん). Perhaps even the pronunciation is archaic, or maybe it's just the orthography of the old reference book.  I haven't changed the reading.

A little confirmation of the added kanji, google translate translates this book extract:
階使に陞遷し
as:
Promoted to the post of chief envoy

These terms are common in Chinese, super rare in Japanese. Not in daijs or nikk, the kotobank ref is "出典　平凡社「普及版 字通」.   

Could delete.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>陞遷</keb>
@@ -12 +15,6 @@
-<gloss>rising up</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1349800">昇任</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>promotion</gloss>
+<gloss>advancement</gloss>

gg5, wisdom, daijr
あかんべえ	29,654		
あかんべえし	84		
あかんべえする	301

I think this is sufficient. The JEs only have あかんべえ and あかんべ.
Not vs.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>あっかんべー</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あっかんべー</reb>
@@ -49,0 +50,6 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2428970">赤目</xref>
+<s_inf>from 赤目</s_inf>
+<gloss>pulling down one's lower eyelid and sticking out one's tongue (as a taunt or gesture of contempt or rejection)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -51,5 +57,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2428970">赤目・あかべ</xref>
-<s_inf>from 赤目</s_inf>
-<gloss>facial gesture of pulling one's eyelid down and sticking out one's tongue</gloss>
+<gloss>no way!</gloss>
+<gloss>no!</gloss>
+<gloss>get lost!</gloss>

あ（っ）かんべ（ー／え／ぇ／い／ぃ／エ／ェ）／ア（ッ）カンベ（ー／エ／ェ／イ／ィ）

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ あっかんべ　 │ 47,557 │ 26.4% │ - add, sk
│ あっかんべぇ │ 32,109 │ 17.8% │ - add, sk
│ あかんべえ　 │ 29,654 │ 16.4% │
│ あっかんべー │ 22,652 │ 12.6% │
│ あかんべ　　 │ 20,072 │ 11.1% │
│ アッカンベー │  9,386 │  5.2% │ - add, sk
│ あかんべー　 │  5,084 │  2.8% │ - sk
│ あかんべい　 │  3,342 │  1.9% │ - sk
│ アカンベー　 │  2,918 │  1.6% │ - sk
│ あっかんべェ │  2,347 │  1.3% │ - add, sk
│ あっかんべえ │  1,505 │  0.8% │ - sk
│ あかんべぇ　 │  1,264 │  0.7% │ - add, sk
│ アカンベ　　 │    909 │  0.5% │
│ アッカンベ　 │    783 │  0.4% │
│ アカンベエ　 │    407 │  0.2% │
│ アッカンベェ │    148 │  0.1% │
│ アカンベェ　 │     98 │  0.1% │
│ アッカンベエ │     71 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

Not sure how many we need to have visible or in what order.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>あかんべー</reb>
@@ -16,0 +14,12 @@
+<reb>あっかんべ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あっかんべぇ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あかんべー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +27 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -20,0 +31 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -23,0 +35,13 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あっかんべェ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アッカンベー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あかんべぇ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Web images show some eyelid-pulling, but mostly just tongues. Perhaps it's losing the original meaning.

@@ -29,0 +29,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2428970">赤目・あかべ</xref>
+<s_inf>from 赤目</s_inf>

eij, zokugo, 218k

funny, I thought it just meant sticking out one's tongue. 
daijs and nikk actually don't even mention the tongue part 
(the word itself is apparently a corruption of 赤目)

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あかんべー</reb>

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -34 +34,2 @@
-<gloss>cup (in sports)</gloss>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>cup</gloss>

@@ -33 +33 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2837823">アジア杯・アジアはい</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2837823">アジア杯</xref>

It doesn't seem to be a stand-alone noun.

@@ -32 +32,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2837823">アジア杯・アジアはい</xref>

https://www.nikkeyshimbun.jp/2021/210309-15brasil.html
https://kotobank.jp/word/W杯-562458

Evidence of usage beyond W杯

@@ -30,0 +31,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>cup (in sports)</gloss>
+<gloss>championship</gloss>
+</sense>

GG5, etc.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<reb>えいとん</reb>
+<reb>えいトン</reb>

英トン	235	100.0%
英噸	0	0.0%
英屯	0	0.0%

Merge with 英噸 1608330.

[ateji,rK] taken from main "ton" entry.

Book results (especially military histories, ship tonnage, etc.) seem to demonstrate all forms.

"British ton"(taken from 英噸) seems better than "English ton" as an alt. for "long ton"(which is the best, least-ambiguous gloss).

@@ -6,0 +7,10 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>英屯</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>英噸</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +18 @@
-<reb>えいトン</reb>
+<reb>えいとん</reb>
@@ -12 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>English ton</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>British ton</gloss>

Entry created

gg5

The refs only have one sense. I don't think the split is needed.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -18,2 +17,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1005430">ざわざわ・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1403050">ざわめく</xref>
@@ -21,7 +19,7 @@
-<gloss>to be noisy (e.g. from people talking)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5k;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to be discomposed (e.g. feelings)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be noisy</gloss>
+<gloss>to be astir</gloss>
+<gloss>to be abuzz</gloss>
+<gloss>to be in commotion</gloss>
+<gloss>to be aflutter</gloss>
+<gloss>to be unsettled</gloss>
+<gloss>to be discomposed</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| 騒つく　 |    109 |  0.6% |
| ざわつく | 17,774 | 93.3% |
| ザワつく |  1,177 |  6.2% |

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1403050">騒めく・ざわめく</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1403050">ざわめく</xref>

As in 騒めく.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1403050">騒めく・ざわめく</xref>

I think just the one gloss is best. The literal meaning is not correct.

@@ -16,2 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>haikai renga</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="lit">comic renga</gloss>

20 articles on wikipedia use "haikai no renga" directly:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?fulltext=1&search="haikai+no+renga"&title=Special:Search&ns0=1
4 articles use "haikai renga"
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search="haikai+renga"&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns0=1

A History of Japanese Literature: From the Man'yōshū to Modern Times
Quite a long passage on the themes of haikai renga (puns, humor, body parts, eventually sex, etc.)
https://books.google.co.jp/books?id=wUxOuD0NS5kC&pg=PA115&lpg=PA115&dq="Haikai+renga"+"comic+renga"&source=bl&ots=hyPw0_PQMp&sig=ACfU3U2w4PZF2dWVqU9kMY9iTCbtWvmmKA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwic76aO4eqAAxWEb94KHUiDAAMQ6AF6BAgKEAM#v=onepage&q="Haikai renga" "comic renga"&f=false

Google book results for either form are plentiful. Some examples:

Understanding Humor in Japan - Page 211
Jessica Milner Davis · 2006
form called haikai-renga, which involved a lot of humor. In fact, haikai (...) essentially means "humor." Haikai-renga was increasingly welcomed as popular literature among the masses and settled into an established form of...

Haiku Seasons: Poetry of the Natural World - Page 19
William J. Higginson · 2009
(Haikai no renga is frequently abbreviated haikai renga, and sometimes shortened to simply haikai.) Throughout the history of haikai no renga a tendency grew to separate the hokku or “starting verse” from the longer collaborative poem, ...

Poetry Kaleidoscope - Page 156
Nicolae Sfetcu · 2014
One of greatest and most influential styles was haikai, emerging from haikai-renga in the medieval period. Matsuo Basho was a great haikai renga master and had a wide influence on his contemporaries and later generations.

The New Encyclopaedia Britannica: Macropaedia
1981 
As early as the 16th century haikai renga , or comic renga , had been composed by way of diversion after an evening of serious renga composition , reverting to the original social , rather than literary , purpose of making linked verse

This is actually glossed in English as the full "haikai no renga" or "haikai renga".  In the contexts that "俳諧の連歌" appears in Japanese (usually historical discussion), this would seem to be the correct gloss. Google book search will yield copious examples.  Often glossed along with the explanation "(comic renga)" or "(comic linked verse)", so the [lit] entry seems useful to translators.

While any style of poetry can theoretically be produced at any time, every instance I've seen of 俳諧の連歌 in Japanese is in a historical context, describing the emergence in the 16th century, maybe through Basho.  After that, it's evolved into something else (haiku, and the rest of sense[1] of 俳諧).  I think that marking this term as [hist] is probably an accurate reflection of modern usage, and helps disambiguate how this term differs from 俳諧[1].

Seems to be a precursor to "modern" haikai and haiku. Would put "precursor to haiku" in the gloss, but already longwinded. (haiku evolves from hokku, which is the first stanza of a [haikai no] renga).

Wanted to move the long description to [expl], but also want it visible in the xref from 俳諧...

@@ -14 +14,4 @@
-<gloss>haikai (humorous or vulgar renga poetry)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>haikai no renga (humorous, often vulgar style of renga which emerged in the 16th century)</gloss>
+<gloss>haikai renga</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">comic renga</gloss>

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1559370">連歌</xref>

Entry created

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1465660">入れ子・4</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1465660">入れ子・5</xref>

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1465660">入れ子</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1465660">入れ子</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1465660">入れ子・4</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1465660">入れ子・4</xref>

Entry created

We could leave とんす in as [sk] but it's probably not worth it.

gg5

I don't think たむろす is rare.
とんす should be a separate entry if isn't uk. Or we could just drop it. It isn't in the JEs or smaller kokugos (or even daijs).

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>とんす</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -16 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2151610">屯する・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2151610">たむろする・1</xref>
@@ -18,3 +15,3 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>to gather in large numbers (of people)</gloss>
-<gloss>to hang out (as a large group)</gloss>
+<gloss>to gather (of people)</gloss>
+<gloss>to assemble</gloss>
+<gloss>to hang out</gloss>
@@ -25,4 +22,5 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2151610">屯する・2</xref>
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>to assemble (as a military unit or posse)</gloss>
-<gloss>to be quartered (in a particular location)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2151610">たむろする・2</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to assemble (of troops)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be stationed</gloss>
+<gloss>to be quartered</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/屯す
屯す
読み方：とんす、たむろす

ngrams are confused on this term and weirdly double listing, but there are no real collocations for this form
たむろする	30250	  
たむろす	1235	  
たむろす	665	  
屯する	2010	  
屯する	750	  
屯す	270	  	  
屯す	45

Split xrefs, add [rare], add reading たむろす (used by xref).

Book search for: "にたむろす" will give plenty of end-of-sentence usage and prenominal usage. It is competitive with "に屯す", but *not* "にとんす"(super rare). If "とんす" is the common reading(no evidence for this), then this is not [uk]. Or we can assume the reading frequency mirrors the xref and put たむろす first.

Seems like regardless of historical pronunciation, modern readers would probably opt for たむろす.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>たむろす</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -13 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2151610">屯する</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2151610">屯する・1</xref>
@@ -14,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
@@ -20,0 +25,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2151610">屯する・2</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

Entry created

Daijirin has a [vt] example. The antonym (抱き上げる) is [vt] in the refs too.

〈抱（き）／だき〉〈下（ろ）／おろ〉し

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────┬───────╮
│ 抱き下ろし │ 471 │ 70.9% │
│ 抱きおろし │ 193 │ 29.1% │ - add, sK
│ 抱下し　　 │   0 │  0.0% │
│ 抱き下し　 │   0 │  0.0% │
│ だき下し　 │   0 │  0.0% │
│ 抱下ろし　 │   0 │  0.0% │
│ だき下ろし │   0 │  0.0% │
│ 抱おろし　 │   0 │  0.0% │
│ だきおろし │   0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────┴───────╯

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>抱きおろす</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Entry created

ヴァルネラビリティ	706	47.9%
バルネラビリティ	677	46.0%
バルネラビリティー	90	6.1%
ヴァルネラビリティー	0	0.0%

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Daijirin (2nd sense):
  コンピューター社会のもつ脆弱性。

Wikipedia's entry doesn't mention any variation of ヴァルネラビリティ. Only セキュリティホール and 脆弱性
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/セキュリティホール

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ セキュリティホール │ 164,544 │ 99.6% │
│ ヴァルネラビリティ │     706 │  0.4% │
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

More commonly as x-ref

@@ -18,0 +19,8 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1074460">セキュリティホール</xref>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>vulnerability</gloss>
+<gloss>security hole</gloss>

バルネラビリティー	90
バルネラビリティ	677
ヴァルネラビリティー	< 20
ヴァルネラビリティ	706
Daijr, GG5

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヴァルネラビリティ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バルネラビリティ</reb>
+</r_ele>

Entry created

My bad, didn't realize iI was hiding  事, those are different I think.

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

11.8% is relatively high for a 無い forn but I really don't think there's ny point displaying such forms unless they are at least 20-30%

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ どうって事ない　 │ 13,684 │ 11.8% │
│ どうって事無い　 │  4,846 │  4.2% │ - sK
│ どうってこと無い │  4,547 │  3.9% │ - sK
│ どうってことない │ 92,478 │ 80.0% │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

どうってことない	92478
どうってこと無い	4547
どうって事無い	4846
どうって事ない	13684
GG5

Aligning 1008970.

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>どうって事ない</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>どうって事無い</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -13,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>nothing special</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>doesn't matter</gloss>

I don't like the "formed directly in its own packaging" as it implies the processing takes place there, and it doesn't - it just sets there. But I really can't think of a succinct way of expressing that.

Thank you, yes, wordiness is an ongoing weakness. Though I'm becoming a mini-expert on all kinds of random topics...

Having researched and written so much, I really tried for a more concise [expl].  It's just not easy.

I've made a second suggestion of just cribbing the wikipedia note.  At least it "suggests" what's special about juten vs. other tofus. (traditionally formed in large blocks, cut into small blocks, and placed into containers with water added).

"tofu in sealed packaging" has somewhat the same issue as "packaged". All varieties of grocery-store tofu are sold in sealed packaging. It's just a question of when the sealing happens. The defining aspect of this tofu is that it is uncongealed/liquid when sealed into the container.

The gloss would be simpler if tofu was "cooked". ("tofu cooked in sealed packaging").  Unfortunately, this isn't considered cooking. I haven't found a concise, unambiguous English word that works. (set, set up, congealed, hardened, coagulated). 

"tofu coagulated in its own packaging" is correct, it just looks kind of offputting...  

"formed" seems as good as anything.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">(silken) tofu in sealed packaging</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">(silken) tofu formed directly in its own packaging</gloss>

https://delishkitchen.tv/articles/887#contents2
充填豆腐	2089

Nice (if over-wordy) analysis. I think this simpler gloss works.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,2 +21 @@
-<gloss>juten tofu</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">(silken) tofu heated and formed within its own sealed packaging</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">(silken) tofu in sealed packaging</gloss>

A modest history of the development of this product:
Uses: Packaged lactone silken tofu (juten-dofu)...("filled tofu")
https://www.soyinfocenter.com/HSS/tofu7.php

"Soyfoods", winter 1982
https://www.google.co.jp/books/edition/Soyfoods_Winter_1982/UF1u8rg1jLcC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq="juten+tofu"+"filled"&pg=PA22&printsec=frontcover
The Japan Packaged Tofu Association... handles the growing sector that produces "lactone silken tofu"(juten dofu), literally "filled tofu, heat coagulated, formed in the package"... juten has captured 10% of the market.

How it's made:
充填とうふができるまで
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRQ4vFa46z4

The form without rendaku seems to be preferred by manufacturers (and ngrams).  Google 充填とうふ vs 充填どうふ. Some example of 充填とうふ:
http://machida-shokuhin.co.jp/lineup/zyuuten.html
https://www.kyotofu.co.jp/itemlist/item_cat/fill
https://www.i-love-tofu.jp/umayakko

One example of 充填豆腐 as sold in the west.  Morinaga was one of the original developers and exporters of the technology.  All exported Morinaga tofu is 充填豆腐.  It simply is not labeled in any remarkable way whatsoever. (except "long shelf life", which is particular to Morinaga and not required. Grocery 充填豆腐 is good for ~2 weeks).
https://morinaganutrition.com/products/mori-nu-silken-tofu-extra-firm

https://www.japanesefoodguide.com/types-of-tofu/
Jūten tōfu (Long shelf-life pasteurized tofu)
Jūten tōfu (充填豆腐, じゅうてん・どうふ) is pasteurized, and is heated then cooled in its packaging. It usually comes packaged in paper cartons or comes vacuum-packed, and has a longer shelf-life than regular packaged tofu.

https://www.likejapan.com.au/column/food-culture/tofu.html
Most of the tōfu sold in supermarkets is generally jūten-tōfu, also known as jūten-kinugoshi-tōfu. This type of tōfu is made by adding setting agents to cooled tōnyū and pouring it directly into a package before heating it to make it set

https://www.justonecookbook.com/tofu-the-nutrient-rich-superfood/
Jyuten (Juten) tofu is shelf-stable kinu tofu, packaged without water. It’s made by the soybeans and nigari mixture seal packed and cooled in the container to harden. 

Here's an example of an English translation of a Japanese product in the Japanese market:
https://eng.topvalu.net/items/detail/4549741779975/
Name	juten tofu (filled tofu)
Ingredients	soybean(Canada)

充填豆腐	2089	94.1%
充塡豆腐	0	0.0%
充填とうふ	132	5.9%
充塡とうふ	0	0.0%
充填どうふ	0	0.0%
充塡どうふ	0	0.0%

The *only* mention wikipedia English gives is an aside in the "coagulants" section:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tofu
Glucono delta-lactone (GDL):... Using GDL as a coagulant, silken tofu can be formed directly in its container, as it does not require pressing

wikipedia.jp claims an English gloss of "packaged tofu", but this is a bit silly.  All tofu in the grocery store is "packaged".  Google "packaged tofu" yields nothing on this.

There is literally no adequate English gloss. In the west this product is called... "tofu". Or marketed as just-another "silken tofu".

"jūten tofu" yields the most useful search responses (both google and google book search).

I had added a [lit] gloss of "packed tofu" ("filled tofu" also possible).  But this is 1. literal/derivable, and 2. all-but-useless.

refs. suggest non-rendaku reading is the most accepted. じゅうてんとうふ

充塡豆腐 appears in reputable sources. (and 充塡 is just a less common alt. of 充填).

It seems to be called 充填 because the tofu completely fills its packaging. It's basically airtight, vs. traditional tofu cut from large blocks, with each block floating in water.

I bought a pack of 充填豆腐. Maybe 6 brands to choose from. Labeled on the front as silken tofu (絹ごし豆腐), "nutritional info/legal name" 名称 for all products states: 充填豆腐

If you want to be really crazy with glosses, the 1982 "Soyfoods Industry Directory & Databook" called this "packaged lactone silken tofu" (vs. bagged lactone silken tofu).  "lactone", or GDL(Glucono-delta-lactone), is the coagulant, but it isn't unique to this product either.

@@ -6,0 +7,7 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>充塡豆腐</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>じゅうてんとうふ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -13 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>packaged tofu</gloss>
+<gloss>jūten tofu</gloss>
+<gloss>juten tofu</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">(silken) tofu heated and formed within its own sealed packaging</gloss>

Wiki: 今日、豆腐は木綿豆腐、ソフト豆腐、絹ごし豆腐、充填豆腐の4種に大別される

Not the usual meaning of 充填. WWW images seem mostly to be of pre-packaged tofu. I suspect Eijiro's "filled tofu" is a bit off.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>filled tofu</gloss>

Plenty of web results, all about the new law, but I don't think it's worth adding as an entry. Once 2024 arrives, the term will presumably fall out of use pretty quickly.

This could be any problem relating to 2024. I don't think it's much use as a general entry.

https://www.sr-suzuki.jp/2024-problem/

I think it's more slang than col.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>

ばびった	794		
バビった	1,007

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>ばびる</reb>
+<reb>バビる</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>バビる</reb>
+<reb>ばびる</reb>
@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>to be startled</gloss>
+<gloss>to get a fright</gloss>
@@ -16 +18 @@
-<gloss>to feel frightened</gloss>
+<gloss>to be surprised</gloss>

Seems OK.

https://oshiete.goo.ne.jp/qa/1632440.html
https://word-dictionary.jp/posts/4318
http://zokugo-dict.com/26ha/babiru.htm
https://meaning-book.com/blog/20190112145946.html
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q113649696

ngrams 

ばびる	876   69.6%
バビる	382   30.4%

I think this can close.

In a fork, Nicolas wrote: Not [hist]? Also, [1] should probably be split
Res sense 2, most of our " ... (Edo period)" entries are tagged "[arch]". I don't think this is a current term about a historical thing, so it should be "arch".
https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Old_and_Rarely_Used_Terms

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

Second sense is in sankoku (for でやく)

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -21 +22 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Koj, Daijr/s, Nikk, etc.
出役	7473

Surprisingly high n-grams for a term not in the JEs. Sense 2 may be especially associated with the でやく reading.

I took the lit gloss from Wiktionary, which seems to consider it an adverbial phrase. I think this also works.

Isn't this closer? It's usually 命令形 as I understand it.
(heard this used just the other day, by chance)

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">thinking that one has been tricked</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">think that you have been tricked, and ...</gloss>

Thanks

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/だまされたとおもって
https://takashionary.com/glossary/だまされたとおもって/
https://nativecamp.net/heync/question/8840

@@ -19,2 +19,4 @@
-<gloss>trust me and...</gloss>
-<gloss>just do it, you won't regret it</gloss>
+<s_inf>used to encourage someone to try something</s_inf>
+<gloss>trust me and ...</gloss>
+<gloss>just take my word for it and ...</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">thinking that one has been tricked</gloss>

騙されたと思って	105575	60.5%
騙されたとおもって	867	0.5%
だまされたと思って	66629	38.2%
だまされたとおもって	1298	0.7%

Looks useful. Surprisingly common.

@@ -5,0 +6,7 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>だまされたと思って</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>騙されたとおもって</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

いず方	186		
いずかた	467

Split from 1189360.

Split from 1189360.

https://word-dictionary.jp/posts/3663

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">my man</lsource>
@@ -12 +13,4 @@
-<gloss>admired person</gloss>
+<gloss>person one respects</gloss>
+<gloss>bro</gloss>
+<gloss>sis</gloss>
+<gloss>buddy</gloss>

実用日本語表現辞典: https://www.weblio.jp/content/マイメン
Other:
http://wakamonokotoba.com/wakamono-kotoba/myman/
https://woman.mynavi.jp/article/220426-23/

4417 results on ngrams. Found this chiebukuro thread from 2005 about it: https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q125358507

GG5, RP

Don't need xref.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>メートル・トン</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1457320">屯・トン</xref>
@@ -10,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>tonne</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/トン
（日本語では「メートルトン、メートル系トン[12]」）

https://kotobank.jp/word/仏噸・仏屯-2080107
ふつ‐トン【仏噸・仏屯】...一〇〇〇キログラムに相当する。メートルトン。

Only needed to avoid ambiguity, usually トン, better term than 仏屯

daijs, meikyo
意に沿う	3,635	65.5%	
意に添う	1,648	29.7%	
意にそう	265	4.8%

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>意にそう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -15 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>to meet wishes and demands</gloss>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<gloss>to meet (someone's) wishes</gloss>
+<gloss>to meet (someone's) demands</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/意に沿う-429872

退修会	78

Rather marginal.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>retreat</gloss>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>retreat (spiritual, religious)</gloss>

tallis0911.livedoor.blog/archives/2875807.html

退修会とは、英語ではリトリート（ retreat ）、 アシュラムの内容と似た修養の時です。 日常から離れて、ゆったりとした環境のもと、 霊的な養いの時を持つこと

https://www.brasilnippou.com/2023/230902-13brasil.html