gg5

In most cases this would be translated simply as "temperature".

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>air temperature</gloss>
+<gloss>(air) temperature</gloss>

gg5 koj daij

"atmospheric temperature" sounds too much like a scientific term

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>atmospheric temperature</gloss>
+<gloss>air temperature</gloss>

I think one gloss is sufficient.

@@ -18,2 +18 @@
-<gloss>temperature</gloss>
-<gloss>body temperature (human, animal)</gloss>
+<gloss>body temperature</gloss>

Sense 2 needed more; just romaji is useless.
Probably [poet] for sense 3.

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss>haikai no renga</gloss>
+<gloss>haikai no renga (humorous, often vulgar style of renga which emerged in the 16th century)</gloss>
@@ -31 +31 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&poet;</misc>

daijs defn for 俳諧
https://kotobank.jp/word/俳諧-112719
１ こっけい。おかしみ。たわむれ。
２ 俳句（発句ほっく）・連句および俳文などの総称。
３ 「俳諧の連歌」の略。
４ 「俳諧歌はいかいか」の略。

俳諧	86437	98.2%
正統の連歌	0	0.0%  (orthodox renga, used in wikipedia, not common)
俳諧の連歌	590	0.7%
俳諧連歌	993	1.1%

Depending on opinions on my edit to 俳諧の連歌, not sure what you'd actually want to do with [2]. 

Seems [2] should be [hist] (limited to discussion of poetry development). Outside of historical discussion, one would probably assume [1].

I'm not sure [3] is actually archaic. (wiktionary only gives the poetic sense, not in sankoku)  But it's elucidating to have one way or the other. Definitely in daijs as the first entry.

@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1559370">連歌</xref>
@@ -28 +27,8 @@
-<gloss>humorous or vulgar renga poetry</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>haikai no renga</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>absurd</gloss>
+<gloss>comical</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| 俳諧　　 | 86,437 | 98.2% |
| 誹諧　　 |  1,611 |  1.8% | <- daijr/s, koj, mk, etc.
| はいかい | 14,614 |  N/A  |

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -19,2 +19 @@
-<gloss>haikai</gloss>
-<gloss>collective name for haiku, haibun, haiga, senryū, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>haikai (collective name for haiku, haibun, haiga, senryū, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +24 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1559370">連歌</xref>

@@ -24,2 +24,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1589200">恐れる・おそれる</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1609420">恐るべき・おそるべき</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1589200">恐れる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1609420">恐るべき・1</xref>

koj, daij, nikk

-merging in rejected 2755530
-listed in my sources as all the old-fashioned verb types, not v5r.  likely archaic outside of fixed forms like 恐るべき.

@@ -5,0 +5,6 @@
+<keb>恐る</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>畏る</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -6,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>懼る</keb>
@@ -11,1 +20,8 @@
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&v2r-k;</pos>
+<pos>&v4r;</pos>
+<pos>&v2r-s;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1589200">恐れる・おそれる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1609420">恐るべき・おそるべき</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1609420">恐るべき・おそるべき</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

gg5, luminous

@@ -19,2 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>good prospects</gloss>
-<gloss>full of hope</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>hopeful</gloss>
+<gloss>full of promise</gloss>

Actually no reference has  内腿 for うちまた.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>内腿</keb>

内股	86833
内もも	19550
内腿	16911
内また	40628

Doing the split. A lot of false positives for 内また.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>内もも</keb>
@@ -19,4 +15,0 @@
-<re_restr>内股</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>うちもも</reb>
@@ -30 +22,0 @@
-<stagr>うちまた</stagr>
@@ -36 +27,0 @@
-<stagr>うちまた</stagr>

gg5, prog, luminous
内股になっ	2,629		
内またになっ	135

I think うちもも should be a separate entry. Only the first sense and one kanji form is shared with うちまた.

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>内また</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -22,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>inside of the thigh</gloss>
@@ -28 +33 @@
-<gloss>one's toes turned inward</gloss>
+<gloss>having one's toes turned inward</gloss>
@@ -34 +39 @@
-<gloss>uchimata (judo)</gloss>
+<gloss>uchi-mata (judo)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 内股　　 │ 86,833 │ 64.7% │
│ 内もも　 │ 19,550 │ 14.6% │ - add (seen in subtitles)
│ 内腿　　 │ 16,911 │ 12.6% │
│ うちまた │  7,790 │  5.8% │
│ うちもも │  3,209 │  2.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯
╭─ーーーー─┬────────╮
│ 内股　　 │ 86,833 │
│ 内股し　 │     52 │
│ 内股する │      0 │ - removing [vs] tags
╰─ーーーー─┴────────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>内もも</keb>
@@ -24 +26,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -31 +33 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<field>&MA;</field>
@@ -33 +35 @@
-<gloss>throwing an opponent by putting one's leg between their legs</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">throwing an opponent by putting one's leg between their legs</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>とり損なう</keb>

gg5, prog, daij

Hiding 取り損う as it's uncommon and only in GG5.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,2 +25,10 @@
-<gloss>to fail to capitalize</gloss>
-<gloss>to fail to capitalise</gloss>
+<gloss>to fail to get</gloss>
+<gloss>to fail to obtain</gloss>
+<gloss>to fail to catch</gloss>
+<gloss>to fail to win</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to miss (the meaning)</gloss>
+<gloss>to misunderstand</gloss>

〈取（り）／とり〉〈損（な）／そこな〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 取り損なう　 │ 1,394 │ 57.4% │
│ 取りそこなう │   750 │ 30.9% │
│ とり損なう　 │    81 │  3.3% │
│ 取り損う　　 │    47 │  1.9% │
│ 取損う　　　 │     0 │  0.0% │
│ とりそこなう │   156 │  6.4% │
├─ーーーーーー─┼───────┼───────┤
│ 取り損なっ　 │ 5,683 │ 57.6% │
│ 取りそこなっ │ 2,530 │ 25.7% │ - add
│ とり損なっ　 │   305 │  3.1% │
│ 取り損っ　　 │    23 │  0.2% │
│ 取損っ　　　 │     0 │  0.0% │
│ とりそこなっ │ 1,319 │ 13.4% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>取りそこなう</keb>

取り損なう	1394	96.7% <- Koj, Daijr/s, other JEs
取損なう	0	0.0%
取り損う	47	3.3% <- GG5

Helpful suggestion. A well-presented case for deletion.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>取り損う</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

caulking 255731
calking 11103
RP

コーキング	112976	100.0%
填隙	27	0.0%

https://www.oceandictionary.jp/eejj/ej-abc/ejc.html
calking(＝caulking): n.コーキング、コーキン...、填隙(てんげき)、塡絮(てんじょ).

maybe some special nuance, but very rare.  Google books turns up 1920s Buick reference manually where the term is used as "filler" in "filler cap" and some other automative terms.  So rare it seems not worth dwelling on...

This appears to be the Chinese term for caulking, and it will turn up more commonly as that.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1048770">コーキング</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
@@ -12,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>calking</gloss>

Fork

Not in koj or nikk even.

Not in diajs. I wonder what reference got this in.

Comp:
諧謔	24168	100.0%
俳謔	0	0.0%

諧謔 is already [form].  Zero hits on wikipedia.  Has google book search gives some results, but they are mostly reference materials themselves.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

Halpern's NJECD has it, tagged as "archaic".

The only reference I can find for this is kanjigen. I think it can be dropped.

Not in diajs. I wonder what reference got this in.

Comp:
諧謔	24168	100.0%
俳謔	0	0.0%

諧謔 is already [form].  Zero hits on wikipedia.  Has google book search gives some results, but they are mostly reference materials themselves.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

It's in GG5, prog and koj. 
I don't think the こかく reading is needed.

@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>こかくニーズ</reb>

Maybe too A+B

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>こきゃくニーズ</reb>
+</r_ele>

daij, meikyo, prog

I don't think it needs to be visible.
Added sense.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -19 +19,5 @@
-<stagr>こみ</stagr>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<gloss>including ...</gloss>
+<gloss>inclusive of ...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -21,3 +25,2 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
-<gloss>including</gloss>
-<gloss>inclusive of</gloss>
+<gloss>bundling together (items of different size, quality, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>lumping together</gloss>
@@ -31 +34 @@
-<s_inf>usu. コミ</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. written as コミ</s_inf>

I've only seen it in cases of dropped 送りがな. I'm not sure it's really needed or useful.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

Often like this, too.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>込</keb>

I think just the one gloss is best. The literal meaning is not correct.

@@ -16,2 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>haikai renga</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="lit">comic renga</gloss>

20 articles on wikipedia use "haikai no renga" directly:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?fulltext=1&search="haikai+no+renga"&title=Special:Search&ns0=1
4 articles use "haikai renga"
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search="haikai+renga"&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns0=1

A History of Japanese Literature: From the Man'yōshū to Modern Times
Quite a long passage on the themes of haikai renga (puns, humor, body parts, eventually sex, etc.)
https://books.google.co.jp/books?id=wUxOuD0NS5kC&pg=PA115&lpg=PA115&dq="Haikai+renga"+"comic+renga"&source=bl&ots=hyPw0_PQMp&sig=ACfU3U2w4PZF2dWVqU9kMY9iTCbtWvmmKA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwic76aO4eqAAxWEb94KHUiDAAMQ6AF6BAgKEAM#v=onepage&q="Haikai renga" "comic renga"&f=false

Google book results for either form are plentiful. Some examples:

Understanding Humor in Japan - Page 211
Jessica Milner Davis · 2006
form called haikai-renga, which involved a lot of humor. In fact, haikai (...) essentially means "humor." Haikai-renga was increasingly welcomed as popular literature among the masses and settled into an established form of...

Haiku Seasons: Poetry of the Natural World - Page 19
William J. Higginson · 2009
(Haikai no renga is frequently abbreviated haikai renga, and sometimes shortened to simply haikai.) Throughout the history of haikai no renga a tendency grew to separate the hokku or “starting verse” from the longer collaborative poem, ...

Poetry Kaleidoscope - Page 156
Nicolae Sfetcu · 2014
One of greatest and most influential styles was haikai, emerging from haikai-renga in the medieval period. Matsuo Basho was a great haikai renga master and had a wide influence on his contemporaries and later generations.

The New Encyclopaedia Britannica: Macropaedia
1981 
As early as the 16th century haikai renga , or comic renga , had been composed by way of diversion after an evening of serious renga composition , reverting to the original social , rather than literary , purpose of making linked verse

This is actually glossed in English as the full "haikai no renga" or "haikai renga".  In the contexts that "俳諧の連歌" appears in Japanese (usually historical discussion), this would seem to be the correct gloss. Google book search will yield copious examples.  Often glossed along with the explanation "(comic renga)" or "(comic linked verse)", so the [lit] entry seems useful to translators.

While any style of poetry can theoretically be produced at any time, every instance I've seen of 俳諧の連歌 in Japanese is in a historical context, describing the emergence in the 16th century, maybe through Basho.  After that, it's evolved into something else (haiku, and the rest of sense[1] of 俳諧).  I think that marking this term as [hist] is probably an accurate reflection of modern usage, and helps disambiguate how this term differs from 俳諧[1].

Seems to be a precursor to "modern" haikai and haiku. Would put "precursor to haiku" in the gloss, but already longwinded. (haiku evolves from hokku, which is the first stanza of a [haikai no] renga).

Wanted to move the long description to [expl], but also want it visible in the xref from 俳諧...

@@ -14 +14,4 @@
-<gloss>haikai (humorous or vulgar renga poetry)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>haikai no renga (humorous, often vulgar style of renga which emerged in the 16th century)</gloss>
+<gloss>haikai renga</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">comic renga</gloss>

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1559370">連歌</xref>

Entry created

daij, koj

This is an awkward merge. I think こま should be a separate entry.
Sense 3 isn't in my refs. I think it can be dropped.

@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>狛</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -14 +10,0 @@
-<re_restr>高麗</re_restr>
@@ -18,3 +13,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>こま</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -22 +14,0 @@
-<stagr>こうらい</stagr>
@@ -25,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>Koryŏ</gloss>
@@ -29,10 +22,2 @@
-<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
-<gloss>Korea (esp. the Goguryeo kingdom or the Goryeo dynasty)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagk>狛</stagk>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1288760">狛犬</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>(stone) guardian lion-dogs at Shinto shrine</gloss>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>Korea</gloss>

The [abbr] was on the wrong sense - when the entry was revised in 2008 the formatting software had a bug.
Sense 3 is restricted to 狛 because it's an abbreviation of 狛犬. The Koj/Daijr/Daijs entries are the ones to check.

@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -33,0 +33 @@
+<stagk>狛</stagk>

Vote to remove [3], unless there is some special support out there.  This is just saying that somewhere, at some point in time, "Goguryeo " was used as shorthand for "Goguryeo dog".  Which to be fair, I'm sure it was if there was sufficient context.

Neither the kanji 犬 nor 獅子 appear anywhere in any reference on the kotobank page for 高麗.
https://kotobank.jp/word/高麗-63319

I understand we had a [restr] on 狛, but I can't find evidence for that either.
Here's the nikk page, also no mention. こま【高麗・狛】
https://kotobank.jp/word/高麗・狛-269235

I just added 高麗犬 to 狛犬 as [oK].  Seems the [restr] we had here is probably invalid, but I suspect there may be a restriction on the pronunciation.  (こまonly?)

It looked very odd to see that there were three types of stone lion-dogs: 獅子, 狛犬, and 高麗.  Well, the last is just 高麗犬＝狛犬 after all...

@@ -34 +33,0 @@
-<stagk>狛</stagk>
@@ -37,0 +37,2 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

is sense 1 really an abbr?

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

meikyo, smk:〔雅〕

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&poet;</misc>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>to call on</gloss>

Found this while looking at other "orig. meaning" entries.

@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>(original meaning) to make a noise</gloss>
+<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
+<gloss>to make a noise</gloss>

Entry created

Quiet. I'll close it for now.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/真祖
真祖	15233
Not in kokugos, etc.

I think this is closer. We possibly need a category for these.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>true ancestor</gloss>
+<gloss>(in fiction) person changed into a vampire by magic</gloss>

@@ -14,4 +13,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>var. of vampire (in fiction)</gloss>
-</sense>

Entry created

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2858630">でんでんむし</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

daijr: カタツムリの異名。でんでんむし。
smk: 〔東北・北陸・関西と鹿児島方言〕かたつむり。

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────╮
│ ででむし　　 │  1,140 │
│ でで虫　　　 │    704 │
│ 出出虫　　　 │     81 │
│ でんでんむし │ 52,824 │
│ でんでん虫　 │ 25,619 │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────╯

Shinmeikai says it's dialectal. Presumably not archaic.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<xref type="see" seq="1572070">でんでんむし・1</xref>

406,000 でで虫
210,000 出出虫
 57,100 ででむし
     19 出々虫

* Add kanji
(Seems to be often written in kanji/mazegaki.)

@@ -4,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>でで虫</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>出出虫</keb>
+</k_ele>

daijr: 十分にゆでる。うであげる。
茹で上げ	92,643	60.5%	
茹であげ	9,870	6.4%	
ゆで上げ	6,034	3.9%	
ゆであげ	44,561	29.1%	
---
うであげ	131	0.1%	
うで上げ	95	0.1%

うでる is a valid reading for 茹でる but none of the refs has うであげる as a headword. Daijr gives it as a synonym for ゆであげる. Given the n-grams, I think sk is appropriate.
I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,2 +20 @@
-<re_restr>茹で上げる</re_restr>
-<re_restr>茹であげる</re_restr>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -24,2 +25 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2826227">茹で上がる・ゆであがる</xref>
-<gloss>to boil something until it is done (e.g. vegetables)</gloss>
+<gloss>to boil (something) until it is done</gloss>

daij

@@ -15,0 +16,5 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>うであげる</reb>
+<re_restr>茹で上げる</re_restr>
+<re_restr>茹であげる</re_restr>
+</r_ele>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2826227">茹で上がる・ゆであがる</xref>

GG5, n-grams, recent JT article.

I don't think all three forms needs to be visible.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>箸にも棒にもひっかからない</keb>
+<keb>箸にも棒にも引っ掛からない</keb>
@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<keb>箸にも棒にも引っ掛からない</keb>
+<keb>箸にも棒にもひっかからない</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

棒にも引っかからない	2277	75.4%
棒にも引っ掛からない	259	8.6%
棒にもひっかからない	483	16.0%

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>箸にも棒にも引っ掛からない</keb>
+<keb>箸にも棒にもひっかからない</keb>
@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<keb>箸にも棒にもひっかからない</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>箸にも棒にも引っ掛からない</keb>

@@ -8 +8,4 @@
-<keb>棒にもひっかからない</keb>
+<keb>箸にも棒にも引っ掛からない</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>箸にも棒にもひっかからない</keb>

棒にも引っかからない	2,277		
棒にもひっかからない	483	
-----	
棒にもかからない	        7,788

See comments on 2131080.

I agree. I don't think a comment is needed either.

に関して	27134896
に関しては	14459841

に関して is already an entry; I don't think this is needed. Perhaps a 〜は comment on に関して?

それじゃ	        1,105,399		
それじゃあ	558,629		
そんじゃ	        90,271		
そいじゃ	        32,605

I think col is fine.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec2</re_pri>
@@ -20 +21,2 @@
-<s_inf>informal; used to end a conversation or introduce a remark</s_inf>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>used to end a conversation or introduce a remark</s_inf>
@@ -26,0 +29 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -31,0 +35 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -37,0 +42 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

Splut from 1406050; see discussion there. I added "informal".

See comments on 2858618.

@@ -12,2 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2837150">２５・2</xref>
-<misc>&col;</misc>

Split from  2837150.

We use [n] for -時 terms.
I don't think the x-ref is needed. The 26 entry doesn't have any extra information.
I don't think it's col.

@@ -11,3 +11 @@
-<pos>&num;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2844892">２６・2</xref>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

Split from 2844892.

取り損ね	        32,805	75.1%	
取りそこね	2,703	6.2%	
とり損ね	        4,337	9.9%	
とりそこね	3,815	8.7%

@@ -5,0 +6,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>取りそこねる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>とり損ねる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Aligning.

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>to fail to get</gloss>
+<gloss>to fail to obtain</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>to fail to win</gloss>

Eijiro, e.g. 易しい球を取り損ねる；《野球》 : miss the easy ball
GG5 (落とす entry): 〔取り損ねる〕 miss; fail to catch.
Reverso

Possibly a recent formation.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>to fail to capture</gloss>
+<gloss>to fail to catch</gloss>

The word appears in https://kotobank.jp/ejword/lose . 
A similar term, 取り損なう is already an entry: https://www.edrdg.org/jmdictdb/cgi-bin/entr.py?svc=jmdict&sid=&e=68054 .
When checking the Google n-gram corpus counts, however, this word has a much higher score than the already-existing entry as of this writing. (取り損ねる: 3094, 取り損なう: 47)

The meaning provided may not be accurate. The word was seen/heard in a news feature program as in 「〇〇が問題を取り損ねた！」where a speed arithmetic contestant messed up in turning over the questionnaire after the buzzer.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>usurping a throne</gloss>
+<gloss>usurpation</gloss>

簒奪 is vt

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daijs: さん‐い ‥ヰ【簒位】
［名］(スル)帝位を奪い取ること

nikk, with ref to the main usurpation entry.
〘名〙 帝位を奪い取ること。簒奪(さんだつ)。

ngrams
簒位	123	  

One example:
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アケメネス朝
なお、このスメルディス（カンビュセスの弟本人ではなく、その偽者ガウマータ）の暗殺に始まる政変はダレイオスによる簒位の後に捏造された偽伝ではないかと疑う説もある

Searched ngrams starting with 簒, and found this.  Somewhat better represented than 簒立 (different pronunciations), and far more generic/direct for thrones (nothing about vassals...)

Split from 2258630.

OK

meikyo (超え):《基準や数を表す語に付いて》それを上回る意を表す。「百万部━の大ヒット」

I suggest creating a 超え entry instead.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>体温超え</keb>
+<keb>超え</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>たいおんごえ</reb>
+<reb>ごえ</reb>
@@ -11,3 +11,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>exceeding the body's temperature</gloss>
-<gloss>over 35°C</gloss>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<gloss>exceeding ...</gloss>
+<gloss>over ...</gloss>
+<gloss>above ...</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/体温超え
https://twitter.com/search?q=体温超え&f=live

Low ngrams, presumably because climate change wasn't as bad in 2009