kokugos (meikyo, shinmeikai, iwakoku, etc.)
  国際予防接種証明書の通称。

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Certificate_of_Vaccination_or_Prophylaxis

@@ -13,0 +14,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>International Certificate of Vaccination or Prophylaxis</gloss>
+<gloss>ICVP</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/イエローカード

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>yellow card (e.g. in soccer)</gloss>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>yellow card</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>イエロー・カード</reb>

ナポレオン	484449	100.0%
奈破崙	34	0.0%
那波列翁	64	0.0%

The ateji versions are in the names dictionary. I think that's enough.

@@ -4,4 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>那波列翁</keb>
-<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>那波列翁</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>

I really don't mind the names of games being tagged.

I've already asked this on GitHub but I'll repeat it here. Do we want to use the [cards] tag for names of card games considering that we don't use [sports] for names of sports?
I don't really mind either way but if we do tag them, I don't think the parenthesised part should be left simply as "game", "Japanese game", etc. I think it looks odd without "card" or some other descriptor that indicates it's a card game.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>napoleon (Japanese game)</gloss>
+<gloss>napoleon (Japanese trick-taking game)</gloss>

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>napoleon (Japanese card game)</gloss>
+<field>&cards;</field>
+<gloss>napoleon (Japanese game)</gloss>

smk, koj

It's above the rK threshold (3%) and it's not a particularly common word to begin with. I don't think the tag is needed here.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>something one always remembers</gloss>
+<gloss>(a) thought one will never forget</gloss>
+<gloss>something one will always remember</gloss>

憶念	2952	96.9%
臆念	95	3.1%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

daijs

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>臆念</keb>

I don't think "etc." is needed there. Its meaning is unclear when there's only one example.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>usu. as 臆面もなく, etc.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. as 臆面もなく</s_inf>

臆面もない	1432
臆面もなく	28515
臆面	40064

Simplifying. A noun can't really be "in the negative".

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>usu. in the negative as 臆面もなく, 臆面もない, etc.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. as 臆面もなく, etc.</s_inf>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>usu. in the negative:臆面もなく, 臆面もない, etc.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. in the negative as 臆面もなく, 臆面もない, etc.</s_inf>

臆面	40064	53.2%
臆面もなく	28515	37.9%
臆面も無く	5136	6.8%
臆面もない	1432	1.9%
臆面も無い	138	0.2%

eow.alc has no definition for 臆面 on its own:
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=臆面
臆面もない unabashed, unabashedly
臆面もなくうそを言う lie shamelessly
etc.

with が：
臆面が	193	  
臆面がない	138	  
臆面がないわけ	22	  
臆面がないわけで	21	  
臆面がないわけでは	21	  

with の：
臆面の	884	  
臆面のな	429	  
臆面のなさ	423	  
臆面のない	262	  
臆面の無	147	  
臆面の無さ	146	  

with に：
臆面にも出さず	107	 
臆面にも出さない	20	  

with other particles and desu:
臆面で	0	0.0%
臆面を	30	100.0%
臆面だ	0	0.0%

note copied from 別状. 

"shy face" seems to have missed the mark.

kokugos define with 気後れ:
losing one's nerve; feeling awkward; feeling timid; feeling hesitant; feeling nervous; feeling diffident; being daunted​

or 臆したようす: feeling hesitant or timid

That said, this appears to be almost non-existent outside of the larger negated expression.  Google "臆面" and  臆面もない comes back.  Dictionary entries for 臆面 invariably give 臆面もない・なく as the example.(sankoku gives なく）。

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>shy face</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1182820">臆面もなく</xref>
+<s_inf>usu. in the negative:臆面もなく, 臆面もない, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>timid face</gloss>

臆面もない	1432	91.2%
臆面も無い	138	8.8%

kanji consistency with 臆面もなく。臆面も無く

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>臆面も無い</keb>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

gg5, prog

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -15,3 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>boldly</gloss>
-<gloss>audaciously</gloss>
-<gloss>impudently</gloss>
+<gloss>brazenly</gloss>
+<gloss>shamelessly</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>impudently</gloss>
+<gloss>audaciously</gloss>

臆面もなく	28515	81.0%
臆面も無く	5136	14.6%

臆面もない	1432	4.1%
臆面も無い	138	0.4%

surprisingly common with kanji here.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>臆面も無く</keb>

It can be dropped.

@@ -7,4 +6,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>化纎</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────╮
│ 化繊　　 │ 81,762 │
│ 化纎　　 │      0 │ - sK
│ 化学繊維 │ 56,996 │
│ 化学纎維 │     38 │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────╯

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Aligning.

@@ -20,2 +20,4 @@
-<gloss>synthetic fibres</gloss>
-<gloss>synthetic fibers</gloss>
+<gloss>synthetic fiber</gloss>
+<gloss>synthetic fibre</gloss>
+<gloss>chemical fiber</gloss>
+<gloss>chemical fibre</gloss>

tidying

@@ -20,1 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>synthetic fibres (fibers)</gloss>
+<gloss>synthetic fibres</gloss>
+<gloss>synthetic fibers</gloss>

https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#References  "for amendments to existing entries, straightforward suggestions such as spelling changes or rewording of translations need not have references, but more substantial changes must be accompanied by references and/or a case for the change in the Comments field.?

@@ -25,6 +24,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<field>&comp;</field>
-<gloss>and (logical operator)</gloss>

References needed. I can't see it in any IT dictionary/glossary.

@@ -24,0 +25,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>and (logical operator)</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

I don't know where "yet" came from.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -17 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>yet</gloss>
+<gloss>and</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,4 @@
-<gloss>and</gloss>
+<gloss>besides</gloss>
+<gloss>as well as</gloss>
+<gloss>and on top of that</gloss>
+<gloss>at the same time</gloss>

gg5, prog, wisdom

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>service business (e.g. hotel, restaurant, entertainment)</gloss>
+<gloss>service business (hotels, restaurants, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>hospitality industry</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>service business (hotel, restaurant, entertainment)</gloss>
+<gloss>service business (e.g. hotel, restaurant, entertainment)</gloss>

GG5, etc.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>service (hotel, restaurant, entertainment) business</gloss>
+<gloss>service business (hotel, restaurant, entertainment)</gloss>
+<gloss>service industry</gloss>

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>hotel</gloss>
-<gloss>service (restaurant, entertainment) business</gloss>
+<gloss>service (hotel, restaurant, entertainment) business</gloss>

prog, luminous, wisdom

"in due form" is adverbial.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>in due form</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +24,2 @@
+<gloss>legal</gloss>
+<gloss>due (formalities)</gloss>

GG5: proper [regular] form; formality.
	～な[の] formal; regular; official; due; full-dress.
中辞典: 正式の formal 《procedure》; full-dress 《debates》; regular 《members》; proper; 《文》 due 《formality》; 〈公式の〉 official; 〈合法的な〉 legal
･正式に formally; properly; 《文》 duly; in due [proper] form

@@ -22,0 +23,2 @@
+<gloss>regular</gloss>
+<gloss>proper</gloss>

@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>due form</gloss>
+<gloss>formal</gloss>
+<gloss>in due form</gloss>
@@ -22 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>formality</gloss>

あいあい傘	6901	11.6%

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>あいあい傘</keb>
@@ -25,3 +27,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>あいあい傘</keb>

@@ -24,0 +25,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>あいあい傘</keb>

I don't think there was a problem with "sketch".

@@ -36 +36 @@
-<gloss>sketch of an umbrella with two names under it (equivalent of "X loves Y")</gloss>
+<gloss>drawing of an umbrella with two names under it (equivalent of "X loves Y")</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 相合傘　　　 │ 36,082 │ 66.5% │
│ 相合い傘　　 │ 14,268 │ 26.3% │
│ 相々傘　　　 │    970 │  1.8% │ - iK to sK
│ 相相傘　　　 │     52 │  0.1% │ - iK to sK
│ 愛愛傘　　　 │    796 │  1.5% │ - iK to sK
│ 愛々傘　　　 │    410 │  0.8% │ - add, sK
│ あいあいがさ │  1,699 │  3.1% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20 +20,5 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>愛々傘</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

OK, I've done the split.

@@ -7,13 +6,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>それじゃ</reb>
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>それじゃあ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>そいじゃ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>そんじゃ</reb>

そんじゃ	        90,271	
そんじゃあ	7,645	
そんじゃまた	5,305

It's valid but I think it should be split off into a separate col-tagged entry along with それじゃ, それじゃあ and そいじゃ. Meikyo defines それじゃ as "「それでは」のくだけた言い方".

Please provide references and/or examples. Is it dialect?

@@ -16,0 +17,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>そんじゃ</reb>

OK. Splitting.

@@ -17,3 +16,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ほんじゃ</reb>

Daijirin and sankoku say ずざん is 古風

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

Sense 2
daijr: "著作物で，典拠が正確でないこと。誤りが多い著作"
daijs: "詩や文章に、典拠の確かでないことを書くこと。また、その詩文"
koj: "著作で、典拠などが不確かで、いい加減なこと"

Nothing about "author".

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -26,2 +25,2 @@
-<gloss>author who makes many mistakes</gloss>
-<gloss>author who uses unsupported references</gloss>
+<gloss>using unreliable sources (in a piece of writing)</gloss>
+<gloss>piece of writing with unreliable sources or many errors</gloss>

https://darksouls.fandom.com/wiki/Divine_Pillars_of_Light

Interesting. I note that the official translation uses "fragmentary scrawl", which aligns very closely with the native speaker's interpretation.
As for the "third meaning", I think it's covered by sense 1, which we've kept very general.

@@ -34 +34 @@
-<gloss>tear</gloss>
+<gloss>tear (in clothing, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -35,0 +36 @@
+<gloss>split</gloss>

https://i.imgur.com/Ce0XSDs.png

A native japanese speaker was so kind as to give me his thoughts regarding 破綻 in the context of my example sentence (from the prev. ref.), link above. 
Despite the added meanings appearing in some dictionaries, likely I had misunderstood what 破綻 meant in that context, and there is actually a third meaning for 破綻, from his example sentence: "「彼の話は破綻している」（日常会話では「筋が通っていない」と表現されます）".  
I leave this info here in case someone wants to improve this entry further.

Yea verily.

There's no rule that says you can't use archaisms in contemporary writing/speech. The lack of any mention in the JEs (including the 95-year old Saito) or smaller kokugos suggests that it's at least obsolete.

probably not [arch] then.

Not in my JEs.

ngrams
僻言	87
『僻言』とはどういった意味ですか？
古語で悪口のことを「ひがごと」といいました。
これに漢字を当てて僻言です。

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1020160035

Not in sankoku. Maybe still [form], but book results mostly from ~1900 or thereabouts. Maybe archaic.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

daij, koj

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>illogical view</gloss>

ngrams
僻説	78

And there are plenty of common 僻〇 terms. [form] over [rare] I guess, in sankoku, marked as 文.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>

明亮 is in daijr/s, koj and nikk as a separate entry. 明了 is in daijs and nikk. I think rK is appropriate for both.

@@ -11,3 +10,0 @@
-<keb>明りょう</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -19,0 +17,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>明りょう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

明瞭	448228	97.9%
明りょう	8079	1.8%
明亮	924	0.2%
明了	824	0.2%

Or [sK]. Listed in daijs, neither alt. form in sankoku.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog
G n-grams:
明瞭	448228
明瞭な	104722
明瞭を	1213
明瞭が	274
明瞭さ	9710

-> adj glosses

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -27,3 +28,6 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<gloss>clarity</gloss>
-<gloss>clearness</gloss>
+<gloss>clear</gloss>
+<gloss>plain</gloss>
+<gloss>distinct</gloss>
+<gloss>obvious</gloss>
+<gloss>evident</gloss>
+<gloss>articulate</gloss>

Both GG5 and 中辞典 flag it as 【通信】.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>clearness</gloss>
@@ -18,2 +18,0 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>articulation score</gloss>

Reverso: extensive examples of "intelligibility" and "clarity". One single choice of "articulation" was E->J and possibly a mistake.
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/明瞭度

Linguistics glossary:
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000028883
主要アウトカム評価項目/Primary outcomes
日本語
最高語音明瞭度
英語
speech intelligibility

print & promotion (w/example photos).  Improving clarity of photos
https://p-prom.com/product/?p=51391
...空中映像の明瞭度を改善した...
また、解像感、明瞭度を大幅改善し、明るい環境での視認性が向上...

Adobe(photoshop) clarity slider: 明瞭度の調整方法
https://www.adobe.com/jp/creativecloud/photography/hub/guides/clarity-slider.html


アーティキュレーション	15259	29.4%
明瞭度	11907	22.9%  <--- mostly inflated by "clarity", and nothing to do with "articulation"
調音	24741	47.7%  <--- traditional "articulation" as we probably think of it


Actual linguistics paper:
https://www.ieice.org/publications/ken/summary.php?contribution_id=KJ00010105686
...
キーワード(1)（和/英）	明瞭度 / spoken word intelligibility

eow.alc.co.jp has swallowed up a whole pile of these "articulation" terms, missing the context that they are niche non-linguistic telecom research jargon.
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=明瞭度
They have found all of these super-rare terms:
明瞭度テスト	0	0.0%
明瞭度等価減衰量	0	0.0%
単語明瞭度	23	2.2%
単音明瞭度	26	2.5%
子音明瞭度	0	0.0%
母音明瞭度	0	0.0%
語音明瞭度	911	85.9%
語音発語明瞭度	0	0.0%
語音聴取明瞭度	0	0.0%
音節明瞭度	101	9.5%

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jibirinsuppl1986/1993/Supplement63/1993_81/_pdf
The Clarity and Noisiness of Sound with a Hearing Aid
補聴器の明瞭度とうるささ

The primary use seems to be "clarity" or "intelligibility" and I have moved this to [1].  This is a straightforward combination of 明瞭 + 度, clear + degree-of = clarity.  The "articulation" gloss appears to have spawned out of some telecommunications industry jargon related to voice-transmission.

There is a somewhat-dated wikipedia page on 明瞭度, which xrefs to "Articulation Score".   It is a summary of a bunch of telecoms papers.
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/明瞭度
The research papers at the bottom are all in reference to telecommunications and digital audio signal fidelity (voice-signal intelligibility).

This differs from the standard "articulation" used in linguistics. 調音：
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/調音

Here is a whitepaper published in 2003 by the company Polycom:
https://studylib.net/doc/18172053/the-effect-of-bandwidth-on-speech-intelligibility
Of all the elements that affect the intelligibility of speech in telephony, bandwidth has been shown to be one of the most critical....

From this paper, linguee.jp found the line:
Articulation index, word articulation, and syllable articulation are all measurements that measure the degree of accuracy
translated as:
明瞭度指数、単語明瞭度、音 節明瞭度 はす べて 、話し手の言った単語を聞き手が 正しく判断できる度合いを計測する尺度です。

This is all fabricated telecommunications jargon.

To be clear, linguists may absolutely use 明瞭度 all over the place with regards to speech and sound transmission. But it would be glossed as "intelligibility" or "clarity", and not "articulation".

@@ -11,0 +12,8 @@
+<gloss>intelligibility</gloss>
+<gloss>clarity</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&telec;</field>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>articulation score</gloss>

Not common enough for spec.

@@ -6 +6,3 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>nf44</ke_pri>
@@ -10,3 +11,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf44</ke_pri>
@@ -31 +29,0 @@
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 目つき │ 322,526 │ 84.3% │
│ 目付き │  38,581 │ 10.1% │
│ 眼つき │   9,792 │  2.6% │
│ 眼付き │   1,021 │  0.3% │
│ 眼付　 │   1,969 │  0.5% │
│ めつき │   8,885 │  2.3% │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

Hiding the irregular forms

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,2 +24 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -36,2 +36,2 @@
-<gloss>look</gloss>
-<gloss>expression of the eyes</gloss>
+<gloss>look (in someone's eyes)</gloss>
+<gloss>expression (of the eyes)</gloss>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>to wash down</gloss>
+<gloss>to wash down (food)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 流し込む　 │ 133,484 │ 96.3% │
│ 流しこむ　 │   4,537 │  3.3% │ - add, sK
│ 流込む　　 │     187 │  0.1% │
│ ながし込む │      28 │  0.0% │
│ ながしこむ │     412 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>流しこむ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

It seems OK, but don't rely on ChatGPT, etc. as they've made some bloopers as well.

ChatGPT translation (worked very well in context)

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>to integrate</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

gg5, daijr
tenosynovitis 36732
tenovaginitis 314
tendovaginitis 1158

Not tendinitis. "tenovaginitis" and "tendovaginitis" appear to be dated. I don't think they're needed.

@@ -13,3 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>inflammation of a tendon (sheath)</gloss>
-<gloss>tendonitis</gloss>
-<gloss>tendinitis</gloss>
@@ -17,2 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>tenovaginitis</gloss>
-<gloss>tendovaginitis</gloss>

[fld=med]

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

悔やしい	727

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>悔やしい</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

"envious" is not showing up in references. I don't think the case for adding is strong. It would have to a different sense, anyway.

@@ -31 +30,0 @@
-<gloss>envious</gloss>

誰かが自分より優れているときに使われる「悔しい」というのは妬む = to envy というのが適切だと思います。

@@ -30,0 +31 @@
+<gloss>envious</gloss>

OK. Done.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,4 +18,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>くちおしい</reb>
-<re_restr>口惜しい</re_restr>

悔しい	1908510
口惜しい	45087
くちおしい	418


mk says 口惜しい is やや古い言い方 - and 口惜しい is an rK for くやしい, but of not for くちおしい. Could we split out くちおしい 
 into it's own entry with a [dated] tag and tag 口惜しい in this entry as rK?

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 娼婦　　 │ 223,017 │
│ 倡婦　　 │       0 │ - sK (only nikk)
│ しょうふ │   3,416 │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────╯

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

https://www.britannica.com/science/Bunsen-burner
koj: 還元炎に同じ。

GG5 has "inner flame" but this doesn't appear to be commonly used in English.

@@ -16 +16,4 @@
-<gloss>inner flame</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2858603">外炎</xref>
+<field>&chem;</field>
+<gloss>inner cone (of a flame)</gloss>
+<gloss>reducing flame</gloss>

内炎	11018	100.0%
内焔	0	0.0% koj daij

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>内焔</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>terrible</gloss>
+<gloss>terrifying</gloss>
@@ -19 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>terrible</gloss>
@@ -21 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>deplorable</gloss>
+<gloss>horrifying</gloss>
+<gloss>appalling</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +27,4 @@
-<gloss>fearsome</gloss>
-<gloss>formidable</gloss>
+<gloss>astonishing</gloss>
+<gloss>astounding</gloss>
+<gloss>staggering</gloss>
+<gloss>tremendous</gloss>
@@ -28 +32 @@
-<gloss>redoubtable</gloss>
+<gloss>enormous</gloss>

恐るべき	436597	99.5%
畏るべき	2211	0.5%

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Daijr, GG5.

Alt. kanji.

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>畏るべき</keb>

アキレス	117699	87.0%
アキレウス	17646	13.0%
GG5, RP, etc.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アキレウス</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<field>&grmyth;</field>

I can't see a good reason for keeping 固茹で卵 visible. 固茹で is in the kokugos, but the count for 固茹で卵 is really too low.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

固ゆで卵	23605	84.9%
かたゆで卵	1103	4.0%
固ゆで玉子	922	3.3%
固茹で玉子	858	3.1%
固茹で卵	642	2.3%
かたゆでたまご	280	1.0%
かたゆで玉子	113	0.4%

With の：
固茹での卵	0	0.0%
固ゆでの卵	173	0.6%
かたゆでの卵	0	0.0%
固茹での玉子	28	0.1%
固ゆでの玉子	63	0.2%
かたゆでの玉子	0	0.0%

hard-boiled, 固ゆで, had the full kanji form as secondary. 茹で doesn't usually get kanji here.  That's the only change I was really concerned with, but there are a lot of other potential forms after that...

I think all the 玉子 forms are safe as [sK].  I always think the main kanji form should be visible, so I wouldn't [sk] 固茹で卵. I made かたゆで卵 [sK] to avoid clutter.

@@ -4,0 +5,7 @@
+<keb>固ゆで卵</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>かたゆで卵</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +13,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>固ゆで玉子</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>固茹で玉子</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Most JEs have it as the noun, but the n-grams have it mostly prenominal or adj-no.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -12 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>contagiousness</gloss>
+<field>&med;</field>
+<gloss>infectious</gloss>
+<gloss>contagious</gloss>

GG5: 〔元旦〕 New Year's Day; 〔新年〕 the New Year.
Kokugos have two senses.

Seems it's both.

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>New Year's Day</gloss>
+</sense>

sankoku: 一月一日の朝。元旦。

元旦	797069	99.5%
歳旦	4269	0.5%

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/歳旦/
daijs:
《「旦」は朝の意》
    １ 1月1日の朝。元朝。元旦。《季 新年》「―や芭蕉たたへて山籠 (やまごも) り／蛇笏」
    ２ 「歳旦開き」の略。

daijs rather unusually points out specifically that 旦 = 朝.

sankoku and daijs both say morning, and both xref the far, far more common 元旦.

Every single news reference is to 歳旦祭, and a majority of twitter hits on "歳旦" are for 歳旦祭（さいたんさい）, which says to me that this is even more rare as a generic use of "new year's morning". Maybe not [rare], but comparatively [rare] next to 元旦.

歳旦祭 2514
歳旦   4269

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>New Year's Day</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1260950">元旦・2</xref>
+<gloss>New Year's morning</gloss>
+<gloss>morning of New Year's Day</gloss>

daijr/s: カツラの林。また、美しい林。
koj: 桂の林。美しい林。

I don't think "katsura forest" should have been removed.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>katsura forest</gloss>

Sorry, I meant to remove them. False positives from the Chinese city.

@@ -6,2 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf46</ke_pri>
@@ -11,2 +8,0 @@
-<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf46</re_pri>

This still comes up as  [news2,nf46].  Can these be manually removed?  (Should they?)

I think I've seen statistics tags removed in the past where the term was a common proper name.

If you image-search 桂林, you'll get beautiful scenery. But the photos/paintings are specifically of the Chinese city/region, which just happens to be very beautiful.

Koj, Daijr/s

The kokugos have a second, probably archaic, sense.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>katsura forest</gloss>

This entry currently has stats tags [news2,nf46].  I think these should be removed.  

See notes/refs on new jmnedict entry for 桂林, a city that is "One of the most popular tourist destinations in China". This undoubtedly explains the news frequency. (I don't think katsura forests are a common enough news topic...)

I strongly suspect this is [rare] for [1], but it's hard to prove a negative.  This is the kind of word where I can just imagine running around telling Japanese people it means "beautiful forest" and getting "eeeeeeehhhh、しらなかった" in reply.

If we're taking daijs at its word, everywhere seems to list a second definition from that source:
２ 文人の仲間。

obviously *not* in sankoku, so it's at least not common

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

神を恐れる	1691	48.3%
神を畏れる	1580	45.2%
神をおそれる	182	5.2%
神を怖れる	46	1.3%

神を恐れる and 神を畏れる seem close enough that the ordering might be arbitrary, but this is not the case for our other entry for 神をも恐れない, which more strongly favors 恐. ngrams seem to be in agreement with ordering 恐 first.

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>神を恐れる</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>神をおそれる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>神を怖れる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

See the entry for 成桂, "promoted knight", which is marked [shogi] (as are other 桂=knight terms).  Specifically not chess.

 [see=桂馬] is consistent with 成桂, which also has the xref.  Seems that both should have the xref for the same reason (why does "tree" mean "knight"?)

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1821380">桂馬・1</xref>
+<field>&shogi;</field>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

I don't think it needs a finc tag.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<field>&finc;</field>

KOD: 〔帳簿や伝票など〕 ledgers and forms.
ルミナス: account books and vouchers.
Daijr: 帳簿・伝票類などの総称。

I think this is a better way to explain it. The original was rather bad.

@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>report</gloss>
-<gloss>form</gloss>
-<gloss>(system-generated) document</gloss>
+<field>&finc;</field>
+<gloss>financial records (account books, ledgers, vouchers, forms, etc.)</gloss>

https://youneedaken.hatenablog.com/entry/2022/09/05/074352 帳票という概念を説明する時は、system-generated document や computer-generated document と書くと正確に伝わります。

I often find this word in the wild, and report and form are not great glosses in this context I'm looking at.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>(system-generated) document</gloss>

Entry created

I think "the" should stay. Seems to be our usual style. 7 entries have "named after".

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>after actor Harold Lloyd</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after the actor Harold Lloyd</s_inf>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>named after American actor Harold Lloyd</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after actor Harold Lloyd</s_inf>

kokugos, wikipedia

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<s_inf>named after American actor Harold Lloyd</s_inf>

Entry created

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

男友達	222852
男友だち	4668

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>男友だち</keb>

I agree. "Boyfriend" is misleading.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>boyfriend</gloss>

But "boyfriend" implies "romantic partner" which 男友達 doesn't.

GG5, etc.

The JEs have "boyfriend". I can't see how that Eijiro version justifies removing it.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>boyfriend</gloss>

ああだこうだ	47225	26.0%
あーだこーだ	134071	74.0%

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あーだこーだ</reb>
+</r_ele>

Entry created

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>faux pas</gloss>

Entry created

"septic" doesn't have another meaning in medical contexts.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>septic (infected with bacteria)</gloss>
+<gloss>septic</gloss>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<field>&med;</field>

Entry created

弓彇 is in several kokugos.

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>弓彇</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

弓弭	548	78.3%
弓筈	152	21.7%

sanoku has a dedicated entry only for ゆはず, but a reference into it from ゆみはず. kanji, unfortunately, is 弓筈. 

https://www.museum.yokosuka.kanagawa.jp/archives/document/5951
弓弭(ゆはず)

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/和弓
弭（はず）
弓の両端にある凸形状の弦をかける部分で、上に来る方を末弭（うらはず）、下に来る方を本弭（もとはず：「元弭」とも書く）と呼ぶ。
To distinguish from 矢の筈----->>>>>>矢の筈（はず）と区別するため、弓弭（ゆはず）とも呼ばれる。

https://kobun.weblio.jp/content/ゆはず
ゆ－はず 【弓筈・弓弭】
◆「ゆみはず」の変化した語。


https://kotobank.jp/word/弭-145322#:~:text=ゆはず【弭】,にしたものは多い。
ブリタニカ国際大百科事典 小項目事典
弭
ゆはず
ゆみはず (弓筈) ともいう. 弓の両端の弦をかける部分

daijs ゆみ‐はず【弓×弭／弓×筈／弓×彇】
https://kotobank.jp/word/弓弭-652140

ゆ‐はず【▽弓×弭／▽弓×筈／▽弓×彇】
「ゆみはず」に同じ。

「はず」は，
http://ppnetwork.seesaa.net/article/450205572.html
ちなみに、同じ『はず』でも『弭』と書いた場合、弓の上下の弦を掛ける部分を指す。この混同を避けるため、筈を矢筈、弭を弓弭（ゆはず）ということもある。」

Reordered kanji and readings. Seen a couple of references indicating that "弓弭" is used primarily to distinguish from the nock/筈 on an arrow(both read はず), and in these cases the reading seems to be ゆはず. (This is the only reading offered on the wikipedia page on Japanese bows 和弓). 

If you image search 弓筈, you'll primarily get the tips of arrows.  Search for 弓弭, and you'll get diagrams of bows.

弭 seems to be a kanji dedicated to the nocks of a bow itself. ("The ears of the bow", neat)

I have proposed new entries for 末弭 and 本弭(which come up in all kinds of diagrams), which reinforce that はず in the context of "tip of a bow" is more likely to be 弭 than 筈.  (even though sankoku does not mention 弭, this strikes me as an effort to simplify-out generally-rare kanji).

Pronunciation is a little harder to reason about. sankoku prefers ゆはず.  I have dug up some references that give ゆはず.  Seems like ゆみはず is the reading you'd just guess if you hadn't learned the term.

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>弓弭</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -7,3 +10,3 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>弓弭</keb>
-</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ゆはず</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -13,3 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ゆはず</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1476430">弭・2</xref>

Entry created

アキレス腱炎	2,338		
腱炎	        3,156

Usually capitalised.
I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2257950">腱炎</xref>
@@ -14,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>achilles tendonitis</gloss>
-<gloss>achilles tendinitis</gloss>
+<gloss>Achilles tendonitis</gloss>
+<gloss>Achilles tendinitis</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

Entry created

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>uninstall</gloss>
+<gloss>uninstallation</gloss>

Entry created

OK. Split.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>カスケードスタイルシート</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -12,3 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>カスケード・スタイルシート</reb>

I think カスケードスタイルシート should be a separate entry. It's not simply a different spelling; カスケード is a different word.

Thanks.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<reb>カスケードス・タイルシート</reb>
+<reb>カスケード・スタイルシート</reb>

I'm seeing both.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カスケードスタイルシート</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,3 +11,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>カスケードスタイルシート</reb>

GG5:  (Ceylon) cinnamon; Cinnamomum verum; C. zeylanicum.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinnamomum_verum
Cinnamomum verum,[2] also known as Cinnamomum zeylanicum,[3] colloquially called true cinnamon tree or Ceylon cinnamon tree, 

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/セイロンニッケイ
セイロンニッケイ（錫蘭肉桂、学名：Cinnamomum verum[2]）
英語ではTrue cinnamon treeおよびCeylon cinnamon treeと呼ばれる。
古い植物学上の異名—Cinnamomum zeylanicum—はスリランカの旧称であるセイロンに由来する

"cinnamon tree" as a gloss seems ambiguous.

Seems silly to not translate セイロン to Ceylon somewhere even if it is falling out of fashion in some places.  Not sure if zeylanicum and verum are both needed somewhere, but wikipedia is under "verum" now in both English and Japanese.

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>cinnamon tree (Cinnamomum zeylanicum)</gloss>
+<gloss>true cinnamon tree (Cinnamomum verum)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ceylon cinnamon tree</gloss>

Entry created

筋者	1,118	87.5%	
筋モノ	160	12.5%

Hiding it so that we don't have to add reading restrictions.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1012760">ヤクザ・1</xref>

I found another spelling in a novel.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>筋モノ</keb>

If you think there's an issue, you should contact Stuart directly or bring it up on 
the mailing list.  He doesn't follow comments on submissions.

Testing the tab button on firefox, it does the same thing.

pressing tab works for me on Safari and Firefox

@@ -8,1 +8,4 @@
-<reb>すじものすじもん</reb>
+<reb>すじもの</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>すじもん</reb>
@@ -12,1 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>Yakuza</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>yakuza</gloss>

gg5

As it's not a loan word, the reading should be hiragana.
I think the note about さがす should be on the ガサ entry. I've made an amendment there.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>ガサいれ</reb>
+<reb>がさいれ</reb>
@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1593670">捜す・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2095900">ガサ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2095900">ガサ</xref>
@@ -19,3 +20,4 @@
-<s_inf>がさ derives from a reversal of さがす</s_inf>
-<gloss>premises search</gloss>
-<gloss>household search</gloss>
+<s_inf>police jargon</s_inf>
+<gloss>house search</gloss>
+<gloss>search of the premises</gloss>
+<gloss>raid</gloss>

ガサ入れ	23394	87.6%
がさ入れ	2097	7.9%
ガサいれ	729	2.7%
がさいれ	471	1.8%

@@ -12,5 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>ガサ入れ</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>がさいれ</reb>
-<re_restr>がさ入れ</re_restr>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Fork

GG5, 医学英和辞典, etc.
インスリン抵抗性	34282

Eh?

Better?

le sigh

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>いんすりんていこうせい</reb>
+<reb>インスリンていこうせい</reb>

gg5

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

Sorry, forked this, rejecting this to leave my comment in the entry.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>insulin resistantance</gloss>
+<gloss>insulin resistance</gloss>

インスリン抵抗性	34282
インスリン抵抗性が	3622
インスリン抵抗性の	5443
インスリン抵抗性を	4739
GG5, 医学英和辞典, KOD, etc.

I don't think so. All the JEs have it as the noun. The LSD glosses almost all the XXX抵抗性 entries as XXX resistance. The n-grams are fairly noun-ish.
I think it's better as "n,adj-no".

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -12 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>insulin-resistant</gloss>
+<gloss>insulin resistantance</gloss>

Oops, accidentally ticjed the delete box.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>insulin resistance</gloss>
+<gloss>insulin-resistant</gloss>

Better?

Thanks to Nicolas

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>insulin resistantance</gloss>
+<gloss>insulin resistance</gloss>

I suggested it because that's how we gloss all other medical -性 entries. It does look a little weird when just one is glossed differently, but I guess it's more common as a standalone noun than the others.

インスリン抵抗性	34282
インスリン抵抗性が	3622
インスリン抵抗性の	5443
インスリン抵抗性を	4739
GG5, 医学英和辞典, KOD, etc.

I don't think so. All the JEs have it as the noun. The LSD glosses almost all the XXX抵抗性 entries as XXX resistance. The n-grams are fairly noun-ish.
I think it's better as "n,adj-no".

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -12 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>insulin-resistant</gloss>
+<gloss>insulin resistantance</gloss>

Oops, accidentally ticjed the delete box.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>insulin resistance</gloss>
+<gloss>insulin-resistant</gloss>

Better?

No, we don't use [rare] with [form].

僻して	21
僻する	0	0.0%

Lower than I expected. (0 ngrams, only appears with して). nothing in reverso. It is in sankoku, it is marked as 文. We have terms with 20,000+ ngrams marked [form]. Not sure if we ever manage a distinction between common [form] and rare [form]. 

does turn up in google book results though. kokukos list as a formal synonym of かたよる。

偏る	104609	87.0%
片寄る	8812	7.3%
かたよる	6757	5.6%
vs.
僻する	0	0.0%

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>

gg5, daij, meikyo

daij/meikyo merge senses

Corresponding x-ref removed from 茹で上げる.

@@ -27 +26,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2826226">茹で上げる</xref>

GG5: be 「well [sufficiently, completely] boiled; be boiled to a turn.
茹で上る	27	0.1%
ゆであがる	4121	13.3%
うであがる	0	0.0%

GG5 can be a bit old-fashioned. I think we can make うであがる just searchable and drop the restrictions.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,3 +22 @@
-<re_restr>茹で上がる</re_restr>
-<re_restr>茹であがる</re_restr>
-<re_restr>茹で上る</re_restr>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -29,0 +29 @@
+<gloss>to be sufficiently boiled</gloss>

Never heard of "boiled to a turn". Googled and found principally references to J-E dictionaries based on this entry.  Zero twitter hits. Scrolling through google results, you'll find just a couple of modern native-English uses.

Google book results yield examples from the 1850s~1950s.  I'm sure some people have encountered the expression in literature, or grown up with it, but it seems too niche to warrant inclusion here. Especially since 茹で上げる is commonplace.

@@ -30 +29,0 @@
-<gloss>to be boiled to a turn</gloss>

daij
(who don't explicitly mention うであがる)
http://cjjc.weblio.jp/content/茹であ%E
3%81%8C%E3%82%8B

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>茹で上る</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +18,6 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>うであがる</reb>
+<re_restr>茹で上がる</re_restr>
+<re_restr>茹であがる</re_restr>
+<re_restr>茹で上る</re_restr>

GG5, n-grams, recent JT article.

OK, splitting.

@@ -12,4 +11,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>２５時</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I think it should be a separate entry. Ideally, sK forms should have the same reading(s) as the other forms.

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>２５時</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

See entry for 26.

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<s_inf>as 25時, 25:00, etc.</s_inf>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>twenty-five</gloss>
+<gloss>twenty five</gloss>

gg5

〔文〕in meikyo. Also in shinmeikai.

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>traces</gloss>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<gloss>one's traces</gloss>
+<gloss>one's tracks</gloss>
@@ -18,2 +19,2 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>whereabouts</gloss>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<gloss>one's whereabouts</gloss>

ngrams
踪跡	229

ngrams, not in sankoku. zero google news hits. Maybe 5? twitter hits (except for some chinese matches).　No reverso hits.　Google book search turns up old texts, some Japanese, many Chinese.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

GG5, daij

神をも恐れぬ	7732	85.3%
神をも畏れぬ	955	10.5%
神をも怖れぬ	245	2.7%
神をもおそれぬ	137	1.5%

神をも恐れない	682	96.1%
神をも畏れない	28	3.9%
神をもおそれない	0	0.0%
神をも怖れない	0	0.0%

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>showing no fear even of God</gloss>
+<gloss>showing no fear, even of God</gloss>

神をも恐れぬ	7732
神をも怖れぬ	245
神をも畏れぬ	955 <- in a GG5 example

I think GG5's translation is better.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>神をも畏れぬ</keb>
@@ -15 +18 @@
-<gloss>audacious or evil to the degree of incurring divine wrath</gloss>
+<gloss>showing no fear even of God</gloss>

Splitting this too.

@@ -12,4 +11,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>２６時</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>２６時</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>twenty-six</gloss>
+<gloss>twenty six</gloss>

nikk etc. notation

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>二六</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>26</gloss>

OK. Never seen it used.

n-grams

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>rubbish collection</gloss>
+<gloss>trash collection</gloss>

ゴミ回収	31561	64.0%
ごみ回収	17747	36.0%
eij

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>pity</gloss>
+<gloss>(a) pity</gloss>

Top 10 N-grams Lookup for 残念なこと (Frequency Order)
残念なこと	621026	  
残念なことに	413881	  
残念なことです	64859	  
残念なことだ	29564	  
残念なことで	28458	  
残念なことが	20755	  
残念なことは	20097	  
残念なことですが	17128	  
残念なことである	11029	  
残念なことだと	9230	  
残念なことにこの	7621	  

we have 残念なことに as an adv already but I think this is worth having too.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>person with many interests</gloss>

KOD:  person with many 「interests [hobbies]; 〔軽蔑的に〕 a dilettante
Reverso: both hobbyist and dilettante

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>dilettante</gloss>

趣味人	73982
daijs
趣味を生活の一部として楽しむ人。また、趣味を生きがいとする人。

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
+<field>&internet;</field>

I think most people are only familiar with the initialism. I had no idea what it stood for.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>RSS (web feed)</gloss>
@@ -19 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>RSS</gloss>

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>RSS</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>RSS</gloss>

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/ＲＳＳ
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSS

Koj, Daijr/s
献上菓子	1556

I think we can keep it simple.

@@ -12,5 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Sweets given to high-ranking people such as lords and nobles.</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>High-quality sweets made from white sugar during the Muromachi period (1336-1573). In contrast to regular sweets the use of white sugar was limited to people of high social status.</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>high-quality confectionary made using white sugar (Muromachi period)</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/献上菓子

I found this term while researching wagashi, I'm not sure if this is strictly a historical term.

GG5, ルミナス  (～の)

Top 10 N-grams Lookup for 原発性 (Frequency Order)
原発性	71385	  
原発性肺	9471	  
原発性肺高	7606	  
原発性肺高血圧	7595	  
原発性肺癌	7519	  
原発性肺高血圧症	6306	  
原発性肝	4829	  
原発性胆汁	3873	  
原発性胆汁性	3817	  
原発性胆汁性肝硬変	3781	  
原発性アルドステロン	3216

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2858602">酸化炎</xref>

gg5, daij, koj
還元炎	1,641	71.4%	
還元焔	657	28.6%	
---
内炎	11,018

gg5, daij, koj
酸化炎	1,061	71.5%	
酸化焔	423	28.5%

Style alignment.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>outer flame</gloss>
+<gloss>outer cone (of a flame)</gloss>

gg5, daij, koj
外炎	1,911		
外焔	0

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ヌードルハラスメント
https://justhungry.com/curious-case-nu-hara-noodle-harassment
0 n-grams, reasonable Googits

@@ -9,2 +9,3 @@
-<gloss>noodle harassment</gloss>
-<gloss>sound of Japanese people slurping noodles is offensive to foreigners as a result, it becomes harassment against such people</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2858612">ヌードルハラスメント</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>noodle harassment (supposed offence to foreigners by slurping noodles)</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/ヌーハラ-1737865

KOD
シーエスエス	4664

https://product-senses.mazrica.com/senseslab/sales/close-rate
Reverso

Maybe a bit obvious.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1329970">受注</xref>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>order acceptance rate</gloss>

https://www.innovation.co.jp/urumo/close_rate/#:~:text=受注率とは？,することもできます。

受注率	4552

個人用  169968

I'm not sure this A+B entry is needed, but with 個人用 already an entry, I guess they make a pair.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1264950">個人用</xref>

https://www.itscom.co.jp/forbiz/column/office-environment/4460/

法人用	20073
Often contrasted with 個人用.

We don't include question marks on 何〜 terms.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>how many kinds?</gloss>
-<gloss>how many types?</gloss>
+<gloss>how many kinds</gloss>
+<gloss>how many types</gloss>

Needs to be split - breaks the 2/3 rule. We don't combine 何/なん/なに entries.

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>なにしゅ</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -14 +10,0 @@
-<stagr>なんしゅ</stagr>
@@ -18,6 +13,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>なにしゅ</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>what kind?</gloss>
-<gloss>what type?</gloss>

http://protist.i.hosei.ac.jp/protistology/Kawatabi98/03.html　ここには何種の生物がいるだろうか・・・。 図4と対比してみよう。	
https://love-spo.com/books/koseibutu03.html　これまで地球に生物は何種いたの？【古生物の話】
http://onno.jp/lab/kanji?KID=689320

何種	18603

daijs （小学館）, with picture:
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/末弭/
うら‐はず【▽末×弭／▽末×筈】 の解説
弓の上端の、弦輪 (つるわ) をかける部分。上弭 (うわはず) 。すえはず。→本弭 (もとはず) 

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/すえはず/
すえ‐はず〔すゑ‐〕【末×弭／末×筈】 の解説
⇒うらはず（末弭）

heianyumigu.com/c/tokusyu/tokusyu010#:~:text=・末弭（うらはず）,はず）」ともいいます。
・末弭（うらはず）
弓の上の先のこと。「上弭（うわはず）」ともいいます。

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yumi
Ura hazu (top nock)
Moto hazu (bottom nock

末弭	246	81.5%
末筈	27	8.9%
上弭	29	9.6%
上筈	0	0.0%

In daijs with picture. Appears on various diagrams of bow anatomy.  Good exemplar of barely-represented 弭(which seems pretty much dedicated to bow-nocks). 

Considered "upper/lower", wikipedia uses "top/bottom knock", which seems good as anything.  Distinction not usually made in English in any standard way.

Separate potential entry 上弭　うわはず　also attested, but rare enough that it's not worth it to me personally.　 

すえはず seems like a modern mis-reading of an archaic form. Doesn't seem to pop up outside of the kokugo entries themselves. (bare search for うらはず returns archery results, すえはず returns dictionaries).

daijs デジタル大辞泉（小学館）
弓の下端の、弦輪のかかるとがった部分。→末弭 (うらはず) 
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/本弭/#jn-219645

本弭	193	79.1%
本筈	23	9.4%
下弭	28	11.5%
下筈	0	0.0%

Corresponds to proposed entry 末弭 "top knock". 

The reading on the synonym 下弭 is, I believe, しもはず.  Not overly worried about that one though.

俗に，ほどよく筋肉が付いている状態。また，そのような男性のこと。

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>moderately muscular man</gloss>

https://happymail.co.jp/happylife/definition/about-moderately-buff/
ソフトマッチョ	8909

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ソフト・マッチョ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>moderately muscular man who doesn't fit the macho bodybuilder image</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">soft macho</lsource>
+<gloss>moderately muscular male physique</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/ソフトマッチョ-1712403

Quiet.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ヌードルハラスメント
https://justhungry.com/curious-case-nu-hara-noodle-harassment
0 n-grams, reasonable Googits

Mainly to be able to point the ヌーハラ to the full form. I'll align ヌーハラ with this,

I agree.

This is a fairly obvious nounをverb expression. I don't think it's needed as an entry.

I agree. I don't think a comment is needed either.

に関して	27134896
に関しては	14459841

に関して is already an entry; I don't think this is needed. Perhaps a 〜は comment on に関して?

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Frédéric Chopin (Polish composer and pianist; 1810-1849)</gloss>
+<gloss>Chopin, Frédéric (Polish composer and pianist; 1810-1849)</gloss>

wikipedia, daijirin

There's also an entry in JMdict that we may want to align

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&surname;</misc>
@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+<sense>
+<misc>&person;</misc>
+<gloss>Frédéric Chopin (Polish composer and pianist; 1810-1849)</gloss>
+</sense>