OK, I;ll move あて to the わて entry and propose an entry for あたい.

@@ -14,6 +13,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>あたい</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>あて</reb>

あたくし: 一人称。「あたし」より丁寧で，「わたくし」よりはややくだけた言い方。主に女性が用いる。
あたい: 一人称。「あたし」よりくだけた言い方。主として東京下町や花柳界の女性や子供が用いた。
あて: 一人称。わたし。京阪地方で，主に女性が用いる。

I think あたい and あて should be separate entries.
I don't think アタシ needs to be visible.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -28,0 +29 @@
+<s_inf>あたくし is more polite</s_inf>

アタシ	2618035

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<re_nokanji/>

@@ -19,0 +20,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アタシ</reb>

Bulk update: deletion of adj-noBulk update: deletion of adj-no
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

GG5, etc.

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>relationship</gloss>
@@ -27,2 +28 @@
-<gloss>relationship</gloss>
-<gloss>(good, bad, etc) terms</gloss>
+<gloss>(good, bad, etc.) terms</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/折合い/#jn-33801

@@ -26 +26,3 @@
-<gloss>mutual relations (between family members, coworkers, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>relation</gloss>
+<gloss>relationship</gloss>
+<gloss>(good, bad, etc) terms</gloss>

gg5

More glosses.
Simplifying example.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>折合い</keb>
@@ -16,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>understanding</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>settlement</gloss>
@@ -21 +26 @@
-<gloss>mutual relations (e.g. between parents and child, coworkers, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>mutual relations (between family members, coworkers, etc.)</gloss>

@@ -21,1 +21,1 @@
-<gloss>mutual relations (e.g. between parents and child, between coworkers)</gloss>
+<gloss>mutual relations (e.g. between parents and child, coworkers, etc.)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 猫かぶり │ 25,591 │ 89.0% │
│ 猫被り　 │  2,601 │  9.0% │
│ ネコ被り │    442 │  1.5% │ add, sK
│ 猫被　　 │    112 │  0.4% │ add, sK (smk)
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ネコ被り</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>猫被</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

meikyo, prog, gg5

Not vs.

@@ -15,5 +15,4 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>feigned innocence or naivete</gloss>
-<gloss>fake niceness</gloss>
-<gloss>fake gentleness</gloss>
-<gloss>beguiling innocence</gloss>
+<gloss>feigned innocence</gloss>
+<gloss>feigned gentleness</gloss>
+<gloss>fake modesty</gloss>
+<gloss>put-on</gloss>
@@ -24,2 +23 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>feigning ignorance</gloss>
+<gloss>feigned ignorance</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/en/猫被り/#je-58293

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>fake niceness</gloss>
+<gloss>fake gentleness</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +21,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>feigning ignorance</gloss>
+<gloss>playing dumb</gloss>

Dunno where that "oK" came from.

I'm not sure the daijisen entry really supports that split but it seems to work.

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/労る/#jn-12262
スーパー大辞林

@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>to appreciate</gloss>
@@ -35,0 +35,8 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to appreciate</gloss>
+<gloss>to recognize (someone's efforts)</gloss>
+<gloss>to reward for</gloss>

eij, prog kana
n-grams
労る	330
労わる	513
いたわる	2950
労った	128
労わった	14
いたわった	102
労って	578
労わって	370
いたわって	2049

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -29,0 +31 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Hmm. I feel those low percentages and absence from major dictionaries should gazump the counts. Not a big deal.

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

We decided on a 1M n-grams threshold for spec1. 解る and 判る meet this easily (when inflected forms are included).
But I don't think we can adequately explain the nuances of these forms in a short usage note.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -29 +30,0 @@
-<s_inf>解る is used for comprehending; 判る is used for distinguishing or judging</s_inf>

わかっ	14795258	55.8%
分かっ	9635157	36.3%
解っ	1114047	4.2%
判っ	966361	3.6%

While that information about 解る and 判る is interesting, it's also rather marginal. GG5 and ルミナス don't even show those kanji forms and the kokugos downplay them. (I'm dropping the "spec1" tags).
I suspect it's probably adding some unnecessary clutter to the entry.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -16 +14,0 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -26 +23,0 @@
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

* meikyo: 「判」は物事がそれと判別・判断される意で、「違い［善悪］が判る」「先のことは判らない」などと、「解」は理解できる意で、「英語が解る」「気持ちはよく解る」などと好まれるが、今は一般に「分」。「文学が 解る／判る」では、前者は単に理解する意だが、後者は傑作・駄作などをよく区別して理解する意となる。
* https://japanese.stackexchange.com/a/117:
    分かる: understand, know (a concept, a fact, etc)
    判る: (think 判断できる) judge, discriminate (between right and wrong, between two similar things, etc)
    解る: (think 理解できる) comprehend (a concept, an answer, etc)
* https://hinative.com/questions/995550
    分かる　is a very common term for the word "understand" (the fact, the concept etc...)
    判る　if you will look at the kanji you will think the word 判断できる which means judgement, discriminate, knowing the right from wrong, knowing between two similar things,
    解る just think the word 理解できる which means to comprehend like knowing the answer of the problem etc...

@@ -31,0 +32 @@
+<s_inf>解る is used for comprehending; 判る is used for distinguishing or judging</s_inf>

* wikt: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ノンクレジット
* https://dic.nicovideo.jp/a/ノンクレジット
* https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1035119435
* https://hinative.com/questions/23793763

@@ -13,0 +14,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>creditless (title sequence)</gloss>
+<gloss>clean (e.g. anime opening)</gloss>

ノンクレジット	11520
ノン・クレジット	568
Reverso

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ノン・クレジット</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10 +13 @@
-<gloss>uncredited (of an actor's role)</gloss>
+<gloss>uncredited (actor's role, sound track, etc.)</gloss>

Countless actor pages on Japanese Wikipedia.

I don't think a field tag is necessary here.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<field>&vidg;</field>
-<gloss>game designer</gloss>
+<gloss>(video) game designer</gloss>

KOD, ルミナス

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ゲーム・デザイナー</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<field>&vidg;</field>

ゲームデザイナーとは、各種ゲームの登場キャラクターやアイテム・背景など図柄をデザインする人のことを言います。

https://www.internetacademy.jp/it/design/web-design/work-and-annual-income-of-game-designer.html

I think we're reserving "int" for one-word exclamations.
I agree that col is better.
I don't think the 待つ x-ref is needed.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&int;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1410590">待つ・1</xref>
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>

Thanks for the fixes. You're probably correct considering nikk dates it to the Taishō era (1912–1926).

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ ちょい待ち │ 5,895 │
│ ちょい待　 │   119 │
│ ちょいまち │ 4,933 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────╯

Might be more colloquial than slang

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>ちょい待</keb>
+<keb>ちょい待ち</keb>
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&int;</pos>

* daijr; nikk
* wikt: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ちょい待ち
* https://hinative.com/questions/649363
* https://hinative.com/questions/13173436

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

daijr

daijs: https://kotobank.jp/word/モナーク-680346

モナーク 10,046

I don't think the x-ref is needed. 災い is a synonym but the words are otherwise unrelated.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1295080">災い</xref>

Koj
0 n-grams

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1295080">災い</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

三省堂　スーパー大辞林

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 哺乳器 │ 7,129 │ 87.2% │
│ ほ乳器 │ 1,043 │ 12.8% │
╰─ーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ほ乳器</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版

哺乳器	7129

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────┬───────╮
│ 哺乳児 │ 173 │ 67.8% │
│ ほ乳児 │  82 │ 32.2% │
╰─ーーー─┴─────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ほ乳児</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

G n-grams: 173

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>infant</gloss>
+<gloss>infant at the breast</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; 三省堂　スーパー大辞林

G n-grams: No matches

Only in Saito (an old EJ dictionary). Doesn't even appear in any compounds. I don't think this makes the grade.

ＮＥＷ斎藤和英大辞典