GG5, etc.

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>relationship</gloss>
@@ -27,2 +28 @@
-<gloss>relationship</gloss>
-<gloss>(good, bad, etc) terms</gloss>
+<gloss>(good, bad, etc.) terms</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/折合い/#jn-33801

@@ -26 +26,3 @@
-<gloss>mutual relations (between family members, coworkers, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>relation</gloss>
+<gloss>relationship</gloss>
+<gloss>(good, bad, etc) terms</gloss>

gg5

More glosses.
Simplifying example.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>折合い</keb>
@@ -16,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>understanding</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>settlement</gloss>
@@ -21 +26 @@
-<gloss>mutual relations (e.g. between parents and child, coworkers, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>mutual relations (between family members, coworkers, etc.)</gloss>

@@ -21,1 +21,1 @@
-<gloss>mutual relations (e.g. between parents and child, between coworkers)</gloss>
+<gloss>mutual relations (e.g. between parents and child, coworkers, etc.)</gloss>

Best to have both.

In daily use American English at least, it is more common to just call one of these a "worm". It seems like it should appear when a user searches for "worm".

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>worm</gloss>

jwiki(ミミズ)
ngrams
 ミミズ	417899
 みみず	117462
 蚯蚓	 18012
 きゅういん	  3980
 めめず	   847

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミミズ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +22 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -32,0 +33 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Looks plausible.

https://e-words.jp/w/本番移行.html

Not in the usual sources, but I've seen it used like this at work.

@@ -28,0 +29,8 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>deployment (e.g. to a production environment)</gloss>
+<gloss>release</gloss>
+<gloss>shipping</gloss>

daij, meikyo, prog

Splitting into senses.

@@ -20,0 +21,6 @@
+<gloss>operation (of a machine)</gloss>
+<gloss>running</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -22,4 +28 @@
-<gloss>operation (of machine)</gloss>
-<gloss>operating</gloss>
-<gloss>running</gloss>
-<gloss>working</gloss>
+<gloss>working (and earning money)</gloss>

GG5: 《explanatory》 notes [annotations] inserted between lines; interlinear notes.
ルミナス xrefs to 割り書き: interlinear annotation; (説明的には) two-line gloss in half-size lettering inserted between lines of a text

Adding a little more.

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>explanatory notes inserted between lines</gloss>
+<gloss>interlinear notes</gloss>

https://www.w3.org/TR/jlreq/#inline_cutting_note

w3 also refers to this as an "inline cutting note"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warichū

@@ -15 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>inserted notes</gloss>
+<field>&print;</field>
+<gloss>warichū</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">typesetting of parenthetical comments into two half-sized columns of text</gloss>

The JEs all say "regular" but official seems to work.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>official (formal) match</gloss>
+<gloss>official match</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>formal match</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=公式戦

I think this could be translated with a wider net, 公式 = official (i.e. not informal) so basically anything that sports officials take note of qualifies

For example, in football a Champions League match would qualify as 公式戦 but probably few translators would translate it as "regular game"

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>official (formal) match</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>
@@ -17 +18 @@
-<gloss>pennant race</gloss>
+<gloss>regular-season game</gloss>

While I dislike dropping an entry which is in kokugos, in this case it's probably the best solution.

I agree. I think this entry is more trouble than it's worth.

Isn't the best option to just delete this entry?

異なり	10424366	  
異なります	8891031

The problem here is that when someone encounters 異なり in the wild it's almost invariably the masu stem of 異なる, so this entry for 異なり is potentially misleading, Fortunately, the meaning is fairly close to that of 異なる. I think we need to keep the ことなり there, but [sk] is probably an appropriate tagging.
One issue is how text-glossing systems would handle 異なり. In WWWJDIC I use a special glossing file which combines this entry with the masu stem of the verb:
 - 異なり 【けなり; ことなり(ok)】 (adj-f) unlike; unique; unusual; 《verb stem》 異なる : 異なる(P); 異る 【ことなる】 ; (v5r,vi) to differ; to be different; to disagree; to vary; to diverge
Maybe that's anough, but a separate 異なり/ことなり may be appropriate too.

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ことなり</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

https://jisho.org/forum/64aa24a012a53716a8000000-dictionary-says-kotonariis-an-outdated-form

As it is now, this entry is causing confusion with the masu-stem of 異なる. See the referenced forum post.

If nikk is the only reference with ことなり, I think we can drop the reading. The "異なり【ことなり】" part of the term "異なり語数" doesn't seem to be related to this entry.

Since -なり adjectives are archaic, I think it might be okay to add a [arch] tag here. This will help inform readers that this entry doesn't refer to the masu-stem of 異なる.

@@ -10,4 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ことなり</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
@@ -15,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

gg5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syllabification

GG5 doesn't tag it as a linguistics term.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<field>&ling;</field>
@@ -13,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>syllabification</gloss>

Daijr, GG5

daijs, 研究社 新和英中辞典
http://www.kenkyusha.co.jp/modules/blog_eigo/details.php?
bid=21

gg5, eij, jwiki

中国パセリ	4570
saw in supermarket

Yech

パン粥	11628

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>polysyllable</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

GG5: テーブルの

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>drop leaf</gloss>
+<gloss>drop leaf (in a table)</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>milk agitator</gloss>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

可愛服	        5,854	
可愛子	        4,075	
可愛デザイン	3,322			
可愛系	        2,309

It gets some use. I think it's worth having. Similar to 面白.

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1577200">可愛い・1</xref>

Not sure this is appropriate as an entry. The kokugos just say it's the stem of 可愛い and sometimes an abbreviation of it.

三省堂　スーパー大辞林; デジタル大辞泉

可愛	4462506

Kokugos.

@@ -15 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>snuffers</gloss>
+<gloss>candle wick trimmer</gloss>
+<gloss>snuffer</gloss>
+<gloss>douter</gloss>

三省堂　スーパー大辞林; 広辞苑 第六版; 研究社 リーダーズ英和辞典 第３版

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>village community (esp. hierarchical, conservative, and exclusive)</gloss>
+<gloss>village community (esp. hierarchical, conservative and exclusive)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>village community (esp. hierarchal, conservative, and exclusive)</gloss>
+<gloss>village community (esp. hierarchical, conservative, and exclusive)</gloss>

* gg5: a 「village [rural] community.
    ムラ社会 〔閉鎖性, 共同性, 対外排斥性の強い集団〕 a tight-knit, consensus-based 「group [society] which excludes outsiders; a 「closed [self-contained] society [world]; a “mura shakai.”
* luminous: (小さな) (village-like) 「small [insular] community; (閉鎖的な) exclusive [closed] society
* wisdom: a village community.
* genius: village community; (閉鎖的な) closed society
* daijs: https://kotobank.jp/word/村社会-642459

村社会　 28,145 57.1%
ムラ社会 19,506 39.6% <- gg5
むら社会  1,632  3.3%

直葬	2515
KOD: 〔火葬･埋葬のみで葬儀を行わない葬送〕 (a) direct cremation; (a) cremation (and burial) without a funeral service.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>cremation and burial without a funeral service</gloss>

sankoku:
  通夜や告別式をせず、亡くなった人をそのまま火葬すること。また、そのまま火葬場に運んでする葬式。じきそう。「━プラン」
daijr:
  通夜や告別式などを行わず、直接火葬場に遺体を運び火葬する葬儀の方法。

https://www.keepitsimplecremation.com/direct-cremation-what-does-it-mean
"The phrase direct cremation and its definition came from the Federal Trade Commission Funeral Rule that went into effect on April 30, 1984. In fact, it is as straightforward as it sounds. It is a minimal service option that includes: basic services of funeral director and staff; a proportionate share of overhead costs; removal of remains; transportation to crematory; necessary authorizations and cremation."

Based on google results, "direct cremation" and "immediate cremation" seem to be somewhat common phrases to describe this

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>cremation</gloss>
+<gloss>direct cremation</gloss>
+<gloss>immediate cremation</gloss>

GG5, ルミナス

Can't see electrode in references.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>electrode</gloss>

Since it's in Daijisen it may as well stay. Harmless.

茶づる	        1795		
あま茶づる	1786

The 茶づる counts come from あま茶づる, the name of a plant.
I don't think a verb can be hist.
I don't think this is needed. We very rarely add archaic verbs.

@@ -5,3 +4,0 @@
-<keb>茶づる</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -9 +5,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,4 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>チャヅる</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
@@ -19,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -21,3 +14,3 @@
-<misc>&hist;</misc>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<gloss>to eat chazuke (Edo period)</gloss>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<s_inf>Edo-period colloquialism</s_inf>
+<gloss>to eat chazuke</gloss>

茶漬る	0
茶づる	1795
ちゃづる	361
チャヅる	0
Daij also mentions ちゃずる (620).

More historical than archaic.

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>茶づる</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -15,4 +20,4 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
-<s_inf>from 茶漬け</s_inf>
-<gloss>to eat chazuke</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1597520">茶漬け</xref>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>to eat chazuke (Edo period)</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/茶漬る/

Indeed. Not sure about ぐぴ/Gupi either.

Pretty sure. Looks like a misspelling.

Bogus?

https://b-name.jp/赤ちゃん名前辞典/m/邦拡/273937