I don't think ふうわり should be hidden. It's in GG5 and daijs.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

ふわり	362801	96.3%
ふうわり	13605	3.6%
ふーわり	283	0.1%

@@ -6,0 +7,8 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ふうわり</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ふーわり</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>lightly.</gloss>
+<gloss>lightly</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>lightly</gloss>
+<gloss>lightly.</gloss>

koj
②所定の材料などをまぜたもの。「ホットケーキ‐―」
daijs
(2)混ぜ合わせたもの。特に粉や調味料が混ぜ合わせてあって、簡単に料理や菓子が出来るようになったもの。「ホットケーキ―」「アイスクリーム―」

ミクス in koj only

ミックスして	87051	99.9%
ミクスして	46	0.1%

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ミクス</reb>
+<re_inf>&rk;</re_inf>
@@ -15,0 +20,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>(pre-made) mix</gloss>
+<gloss>cake mix</gloss>

gg5, prog, luminous, daij, meikyo

Added sense.

@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>mixture</gloss>
+<gloss>mixing</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +19,6 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<gloss>mixed doubles team</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>mixed race</gloss>
@@ -18 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>multiracial person</gloss>

花梨	253260	18.1%
花林	15682	1.1%
花櫚	661	0.0%
榠樝	93	0.0%
かりん	879643	62.8%
カリン	250257	17.9

I pointed that out last year. Simplest thing is to hide the rare forms and remove the restrictions.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,3 +26,0 @@
-<stagk>花梨</stagk>
-<stagk>花林</stagk>
-<stagk>花櫚</stagk>
@@ -35,2 +34,0 @@
-<stagk>花梨</stagk>
-<stagk>榠樝</stagk>
@@ -43 +40,0 @@
-<stagk>花梨</stagk>

All meanings are restricted to kanji only, so the reading カリン [nokanji] has not meanings. I think it should be fixed.

Hmmm. Works fine for edict2 format, but for the old edict there's a gloss-less カリン entry generated. I think I'll ignore it. The only way to force it is to add カリン to the [restr..] for each sense.

Reopen.

A different generator now. See if this works. I'll approve and reopen as I want to see if the カリン gets through.

@@ -23,0 +24,3 @@
+<stagk>花梨</stagk>
+<stagk>花林</stagk>
+<stagk>花櫚</stagk>
@@ -26 +28,0 @@
-<s_inf>not 榠樝</s_inf>
@@ -32,0 +35,2 @@
+<stagk>花梨</stagk>
+<stagk>榠樝</stagk>
@@ -35 +38,0 @@
-<s_inf>not 花林 or 花櫚</s_inf>
@@ -39,0 +43 @@
+<stagk>花梨</stagk>
@@ -42 +45,0 @@
-<s_inf>only 花梨 or カリン</s_inf>

GG5 leads with "unpleasant; disagreeable" but I agree they are a bit tame. The other JEs don't have them.
I don't think we need to be given examples for ominous.

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<gloss>ominous (e.g. dream)</gloss>
+<gloss>ominous</gloss>
@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<gloss>unlucky</gloss>

https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/忌まわしい

sankoku 忌むべき (we give "abominable; detestable")
憎むべき　（"to hate", "to detest"）

E->J example defining "ominous" using 忌まわしい
忌まわしい を英語で教えて!
2023/01/16 10:00
古代，人の死は忌まわしいもとして、忌み嫌われてきたと言いたいです。
https://nativecamp.net/heync/question/20963


https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/en/忌まわしい/
〔胸の悪くなる〕disgusting, detestable；〔不吉な〕ominous

The kanji itself currently has "abhor" attached to it.  

"abhorrent" is quite common:
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/忌まわしい#abhorrent

abominable is also common.

"unpleasant" seems like quite an understatement. Does not appear in reverso (and there are many examples).  Same for "disagreeable" (very mild). 

"unsavory" likewise. "unsavory" is an actual attempt to downplay the severity of the term.  忌まわしい seems to be rather overtly severe

eow.alc.co.jp has a good list of terms; they are all severe, and "unsavory", "unpleasant", "disagreeable" do not appear on it.
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=忌まわしい

+[rare] on [2].  Sense[2] does not appear in sankoku, and none of the glosses listed under [2] ever appear in reverso.
daijs give ~夢 as its example:

忌まわしい夢	67 ngrams

I'd say the absence from sankoku is telling.

for comparison to sense [1]:
忌まわしい記憶	7914  
忌まわしい事件	7698	  
忌まわしい過去	7582	  
忌まわしい出来事	2574

daijs defines sense[2] using  不吉.  We don't have "unlucky" on that term, I don't think it fits here either. Overly generic.  "An ominous dream" works, "An unlucky dream" does not. There's something associated with revulsion even in sense[2], not just "good luck/bad luck", I think.

@@ -18,2 +18 @@
-<gloss>unpleasant</gloss>
-<gloss>disagreeable</gloss>
+<gloss>abhorrent</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>detestable</gloss>
@@ -22 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>unsavory</gloss>
+<gloss>horrid</gloss>
+<gloss>repugnant</gloss>
@@ -26 +27,2 @@
-<gloss>unlucky</gloss>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>ominous (e.g. dream)</gloss>
@@ -28 +29,0 @@
-<gloss>ominous</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>ominous</gloss>

腹立たしい	196914	98.8%
腹だたしい	2485	1.2%
GG5: provoking; irritating; aggravating; exasperating; galling; maddening.
Other JEs much the same

Throwing away glosses on the basis of Reverso and Eijiro is a risky move. The published JEs occasionally miss a point, but in general they are rather solid.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19 +20 @@
-<gloss>exasperating</gloss>
+<gloss>irritating</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +25,2 @@
+<gloss>exasperating</gloss>
+<gloss>provoking</gloss>

irritating + upsetting = exasperating

"exasperating" is *extremely* common on reverso. 
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/腹立たしい

Also appears as the #1 gloss here:
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=腹立たしい

Some reverso hits for "maddening", also appears in ref above, also I just like it, since 腹立つ is "to get angry (mad)"

Replaced "irritating" with "infuriating". "irritating" doesn't appear in reverso, and seems like another case of understatement.  infuriating feels maybe a bit strong, but does have reverso examples. Pushed it to the end.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>irritating</gloss>
+<gloss>exasperating</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>maddening</gloss>
+<gloss>infuriating</gloss>

Google n-grams:
腹立たしい	196914
腹だたしい	2485

A bit over 1% in the n-grams.

BCCWJ

腹だたしい is a relatively common spelling. 腹立たし=349, 腹だたし=17 (around 5 %) occurrences in BCCWJ (https://shonagon.ninjal.ac.jp), Stumbled upon it in Endō Shūsaku's novel Samurai.
Also in line with a related entry "腹が立つ； 腹がたつ".

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>腹だたしい</keb>

[vi]: sankoku, smk, iwakoku

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -25,0 +28 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daij, gg5, prog

Added senses.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +14,13 @@
+<gloss>return</gloss>
+<gloss>repayment</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>revenge</gloss>
+<gloss>retaliation</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>reply</gloss>

See comments on 2857050.

@@ -30,3 +30 @@
-<field>&phil;</field>
-<gloss>pramana</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">means by which one gains accurate and valid knowledge (in Indian philosophy)</gloss>
+<gloss>pramana (means by which one gains accurate and valid knowledge; in Indian philosophy)</gloss>

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<field>&Buddh;</field>
+<field>&phil;</field>
@@ -32 +32 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">(in Indian philosophy) means by which one gains accurate and valid knowledge</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">means by which one gains accurate and valid knowledge (in Indian philosophy)</gloss>

chujiten, prog, daij

@@ -23,2 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>to accompany</gloss>
-<gloss>to go with</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +24,2 @@
+<gloss>to go in company (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>to go along (with)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 連れ立っ │ 69,445 │ 79.8% │
│ 連れだっ │ 15,740 │ 18.1% │ - add
│ 連立っ　 │    823 │  0.9% │
│ つれ立っ │    231 │  0.3% │
│ つれだっ │    817 │  0.9% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>連れだつ</keb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 慇懃無礼　　 │ 22,579 │ 98.2% │
│ いんぎん無礼 │    314 │  1.4% │ - add, sK (jitsuyou)
│ インギン無礼 │     89 │  0.4% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>いんぎん無礼</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5, wisdom

@@ -14,2 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>hypocritical courtesy</gloss>
-<gloss>superficially polite but rude in intent</gloss>
+<gloss>superficially polite but actually rude</gloss>
+<gloss>rude under a veneer of politeness</gloss>
+<gloss>courteous on the surface but insolent at heart</gloss>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 瀟洒　　　 │ 72,838 │ 94.5% │
│ 瀟酒　　　 │  3,568 │  4.6% │ - add, sK (jitsuyou: 「瀟洒」の誤り。)
│ 瀟灑　　　 │    699 │  0.9% │
│ しょうしゃ │  5,076 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>瀟酒</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 瀟洒　　　 │ 72,838 │ 98.7% │
│ 瀟灑　　　 │    699 │  0.9% │ 🡠 rK
│ しょうしゃ │  5,076 │  N/A  │
│ ショウシャ │    229 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 猥談　　 │ 12,720 │ 86.4% │
│ ワイ談　 │  1,304 │  8.9% │ - add
│ わい談　 │    466 │  3.2% │
│ わいだん │    153 │  1.0% │
│ ワイダン │     84 │  0.6% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ワイ談</keb>

gg5, luminous
猥談	12720	96.5%
わい談	466	3.5%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>obscene talk</gloss>
+<gloss>lewd conversation</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>smut</gloss>

GG5 has those later, tagged "《口》".

@@ -20,2 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>tantrum (esp. of children)</gloss>
-<gloss>temper tantrum</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +23,2 @@
+<gloss>tantrum (esp. of children)</gloss>
+<gloss>temper tantrum</gloss>

子どもの癇癪（かんしゃく）とは？ (with pictures)
https://h-navi.jp/column/article/35026430

Image or video search will be clear, with or without 子供の, really. 
子供の癇癪	503

Google: 
site:twitter.com 癇癪

All children's temper tantrums.  (I believe "tantrum" and "temper tantrum" are more or less synonymous, I was raised with the long form)

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>tantrum (esp. of children)</gloss>
+<gloss>temper tantrum</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 癇癪　　　 │ 58,509 │ 98.9% │
│ 癇しゃく　 │    409 │  0.7% │ 🡠 adding
│ 疳癪　　　 │    222 │  0.4% │ 🡠 iK to sK
│ かんしゃく │ 74,519 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<keb>癇しゃく</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -9 +13 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Probably could be [rK].

忌ま忌ましい is the form displayed in the majority of references.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

GG5: 〔腹立たしい〕 infuriating; annoying; maddening; irritating; infernal 《noise》; 〔呪わしい〕 hateful; offensive; detestable; (むかつくような) disgusting; revolting.
中辞典: vexing; annoying; aggravating; exasperating; provoking; galling; cursed; confounded; 《文》 vexatious

Terms like "effing' and "frigging" are way off the mark.
See: https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#References
"the Eijiro glossary should not be the sole source of references for a proposed entry, although it may be used as a supplementary reference for confirming meanings. This is because the glossary is a collection of Japanese-English pairs which have apparently been collected from translations. In a Japan Times article Daniel Morales described it as "a smorgasbord of reibun and definitions, some of which err on the side of slang, often delighting the expat community."

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,4 +21,5 @@
-<gloss>damned</gloss>
-<gloss>effing</gloss>
-<gloss>infernal</gloss>
-<gloss>frigging</gloss>
+<gloss>infuriating</gloss>
+<gloss>provoking</gloss>
+<gloss>irritating</gloss>
+<gloss>aggravating</gloss>
+<gloss>vexing</gloss>

忌々しい	29225	96.0%
忌ま忌ましい	950	3.1%
忌忌しい	266	0.9%

reordered kanji.
sanoku form is 忌ま忌ましい, oddly enough.

sanoku defines using 腹立たしい (irritating; aggravating; upsetting)

忌忌しい should be low enough for [sK], especially since 忌々しい implies it is a possibility anyway.

Our glosses do not appear in reverso. eow.alc glosses are illumuniting.
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=いまいましい&ref=wl

This appears to be an informal extension of 忌まわしい("to grate on one's nerves"). "damned", "effing" (fucking), are given, along with "cotton-picking" and "consarned".  
Reverso confirms this usage:
A bloody dead man tried to kill me... ("bloody", used in several entries)
Then when that darn levee broke ("darn")
Those darn student loan people start calling
How can I get hold of the ring? Devilish fix! (devilish)
忌々しいビデオを漏らすのを止めるというメッセージ <->  saying "Stop leaking my motherf*king videos",

Seems like a mild expletive expressing irritation. That makes "annoying" and "provoking" more of a definition than a gloss.

Some alternate suggestions: synonyms for "bloody":
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaurus/bloody
damned (slang) 
flaming 
fucking (taboo, slang) 
bleeding 
blooming (informal) 
freaking (slang, mainly US) 
rotten 
blinking 
confounded 
ruddy 
infernal (informal) 
deuced 
wretched 
frigging (taboo, slang) 

I threw a few of them into the "meanings" just to call attention to the issue. I'm not married to any particular terms. Again, for a considerably longer list of potential glosses:
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=いまいましい&ref=wl

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>忌忌しい</keb>
+<keb>忌ま忌ましい</keb>
@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<keb>忌ま忌ましい</keb>
+<keb>忌忌しい</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19 +20,4 @@
-<gloss>provoking</gloss>
+<gloss>damned</gloss>
+<gloss>effing</gloss>
+<gloss>infernal</gloss>
+<gloss>frigging</gloss>

daij, meikyo

Not a noun.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 奇天烈　 │ 53,288 │ 35.9% │
│ きてれつ │  7,326 │  4.9% │
│ キテレツ │ 87,936 │ 59.2% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

sankoku and obunsha have (俗) tags

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

〈思（し）／おぼし／オボシ〉〈召（し）／めし／メシ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 思し召し　 │ 32,590 │ 51.1% │
│ 思召　　　 │ 14,256 │ 22.3% │
│ 思召し　　 │  4,392 │  6.9% │ - add, sK
│ おぼし召し │  1,288 │  2.0% │
│ 思しめし　 │    347 │  0.5% │ - add, sK
│ 思し召　　 │    117 │  0.2% │
│ おぼし召　 │     22 │  0.0% │
│ おぼしめし │ 10,565 │ 16.6% │
│ オボシメシ │    258 │  0.4% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+<keb>思召し</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +16,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>思しめし</keb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 思し召し　 │ 32,590 │ 55.5% │
│ 思召　　　 │ 14,256 │ 24.3% │
│ おぼし召し │  1,288 │  2.2% │ - sK
│ おぼしめし │ 10,565 │ 18.0% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Encountered this spelling in the CCs for 精霊の守り人 and この素晴らしい世界に祝福を！2.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>おぼし召し</keb>

Indeed. If it weren't in Daijirin and 日本国語大辞典 I'd drop it.

馬鹿丁寧 is much more common

〈馬鹿／ばか／バカ〉〈慇懃／いんぎん／インギン〉

Kyoto/Melbourne N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬───╮
│ 馬鹿慇懃　　 │ 1 │
│ ばか慇懃　　 │ 0 │
│ バカ慇懃　　 │ 0 │
│ 馬鹿いんぎん │ 0 │
│ 馬鹿インギン │ 0 │
│ ばかいんぎん │ 0 │
│ バカいんぎん │ 0 │
│ ばかインギン │ 0 │
│ バカインギン │ 0 │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴───╯

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1674230">馬鹿丁寧</xref>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Entry created

prog, luminous
角が立つ	        32,177	95.1%	
カドが立つ	1,661	4.9%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15 +15,0 @@
-<re_restr>角が立つ</re_restr>
@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>to create hard feelings</gloss>

to cause offense 2636
to cause offence 15297

@@ -22,2 +22 @@
-<gloss>to cause offense</gloss>
-<gloss>to cause offence</gloss>
+<gloss>to cause offence (offense)</gloss>

I see a concerted effort to include "offense" and "offence" in all relevant entries, leading with "offense". Only a handful of entries are missing this.

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>to cause offence</gloss>

角が立つ	32177
カドが立つ	1661

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<re_restr>角が立つ</re_restr>

An attempt at improving the entry. 

I don't really like any of those gg5 glosses and would rather see them gone.

@@ -23,5 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>snapping back (at someone)</gloss>
-<gloss>lashing out (despite being in the wrong)</gloss>
-<gloss>counterblast</gloss>
-<gloss>counteroffensive</gloss>
-<gloss>backlash</gloss>
+<gloss>snapping back (at someone) despite being in the wrong</gloss>
+<gloss>getting mad back</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 逆ギレ　　 │ 235,273 │ 60.0% │
│ 逆切れ　　 │ 155,667 │ 39.7% │
│ 逆ぎれ　　 │     941 │  0.2% │ - sK
│ ぎゃくギレ │     152 │  0.0% │ - drop
│ ぎゃくぎれ │     182 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,4 +14,0 @@
-<reb>ぎゃくギレ</reb>
-<re_restr>逆ギレ</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -19,2 +15,0 @@
-<re_restr>逆切れ</re_restr>
-<re_restr>逆ぎれ</re_restr>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

中辞典 (describes "get on one's nerves" as colloquial.)

@@ -16,0 +17,3 @@
+<gloss>to irritate</gloss>
+<gloss>to offend</gloss>
+<gloss>to provoke</gloss>
@@ -18 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>to be irritating</gloss>

癇に障る	10337	44.2%
癪に障る	13067	55.8%

「癪に障る」とは？意味や由来、「癇に障る」との違いを解説します
https://39mag.benesse.ne.jp/lifestyle/content/?id=133238

See comments on 癪に障る, which appears to be largely synonymous, and has similar ngram counts.

Moved the English [exp] to the front (and reference suggests "get one one's nerves" is somewhat linked to the literal underlying etymology). 

I'd suggest "to be irritating" over "to irritate one", which is somewhat awkward. "to be irritating to whoever is the possessor of 癇, which is 'oneself' by default". 
の癇に障る	1244
彼女の癇に障る	34
相手の癇に障る	31
母は落ち着いた声で言い返し、それが父の癇に障るのか、毎喧嘩ごとに家の何かが壊れます。

Not many reverso examples. One glosses as "abrasive" (e.g. personality), 癇に障る性格, which is interesting but not especially common.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>to irritate one</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>to be irritating</gloss>

Entry created

smk: 罪を犯しやすい傾向にあること。

I agree with Brian that "likelihood" is misleading.
I don't think adj-f is needed unless we're glossing it as an adjective.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -18,2 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>likelihood of committing a crime</gloss>
-<gloss>pre-delinquent</gloss>
+<gloss>being likely to commit a crime</gloss>
+<gloss>pre-delinquency</gloss>

GG5: 【法】 likelihood of committing a crime.
None of the kokugos I checked had this term - they only have entries for 虞犯少年.

I think this amendment overcomplicates the entry. I frankly think it was better the way it was. One sense is enough.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -20,6 +21 @@
-<gloss>status offense</gloss>
-<gloss>(cases of) pre-delinquency (esp. juvenile pre-delinquency)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
-<field>&law;</field>
+<gloss>likelihood of committing a crime</gloss>
@@ -27 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>feared likely to commit a crime (esp. to suggest social intervention)</gloss>

虞犯	4880	58.7%
ぐ犯	2786	33.5%

虞犯少年	2383	66.7%
ぐ犯少年	1192	33.3%

====
https://hakusyo1.moj.go.jp/en/46/nfm/n_46_2_3_2_4_3.html
Fig. III-30 shows the trends in the percent distribution of persons newly admitted to juvenile training schools, by offense and by age since 1980. As for junior juveniles, larceny and status offense accounted for 3/4 in 1980. However, the percent distribution of status offenses has declined to a large extent, and robbery and extortion have increased since 1995

Same document, Japanese source:
https://hakusyo1.moj.go.jp/jp/42/nfm/n_42_2_3_2_4_3.html
... 窃盗及び虞犯が4分の3を占めていたが，平成7年以降，虞犯の比率が大幅に低下し ...

====

Reassessing Juvenile Justice in Japan: Net widening or diversion?
https://apjjf.org/2017/09/Ellis.html
Juvenile pre-delinquency violations referred to the police are recorded. Yoder therefore used 2008 statistics and noted that the 1,361,769 recorded youth pre-delinquency status offences far outnumbered the 134,415 penal code offences by young people (Yoder, 2011, p. 37; Hanzai Hakusho, 2009; Seishonen Hakusho3, 2009) and that pre-delinquency rates more than doubled between 1972 and 1983. The implication here is that all 1,361,769 pre-delinquency cases would result in a juvenile police record. 
...
Figure 1: Number of juveniles issued with police guidance for pre-delinquency status offences, 1975-2014


Lots of data, ぐ犯 orthography:
https://wellness-keijibengo.com/guhan/

I think that "虞犯" is perhaps more accurately "likely to commit a crime".  If we "noun" this as "likelihood", then I would expect to be able to say 虞犯は２０％, or 虞犯が高い。Those do not work. 

The noun given in sankoku is おそれ.  Thus, something like
[expl] concern(or fear) that someone is likely to commit a crime

I added, but then removed this in the end as it seemed redundant with what I arrived at for sense [2].

For sense[2], note that obvious noun searches like:
虞犯がある and 虞犯がない return next-to-nothing in a google search. So while this has the meaning if the [expl] above, it doesn't seem to be used as a standalone noun this way.　Hence [adj-f] only on [2]. I'm not sure if there are examples/rationales I have not considered here...

Contrary to my original argument against "status offense" on 虞犯少年, 虞犯 by itself is very often glossed on reverso as "status offense". In fact, "虞犯" in the sense of "reason for admitting a minor into a juvenile training school", along with things like "larceny", is translated as "status offense" by the Ministry of Justice. 

So, maybe "虞犯" could be considered a kind of "offense" (if not a criminal one), for which a juvenile can be forced into some kind of education/remediation system.  And "status offender" was indeed fine on 虞犯少年.  I suppose.  At least, the Ministry of Justice seemed to be OK with the gloss.

The [xref] has explanatory power for both sense.   I rather suspect that sense [1] was actually derived backwards from 虞犯少年. "status offense", as I noted in 虞犯少年, is not an exact equivalent, so the xref provides some clarity on what this actually means in Japanese.    On the other hand for [2], 虞犯少年 is the actual [adj-f] usage, and "pre-delinquent" is also a term meriting additional information.

In addition to the moj ref, lots of additional reverso matches for this simple "status offense" sense:
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/虞犯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ぐ犯</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15,9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2621360">虞犯少年</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2621360">虞犯少年</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2621360">虞犯少年</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2621360">虞犯少年</xref>
+<field>&law;</field>
+<gloss>status offense</gloss>
+<gloss>(cases of) pre-delinquency (esp. juvenile pre-delinquency)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -13 +25 @@
-<gloss>likelihood of committing a crime</gloss>
+<field>&law;</field>
@@ -14,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>feared likely to commit a crime (esp. to suggest social intervention)</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +14,1 @@
+<gloss>pre-delinquent</gloss>

付けっぱなし	54,076	18.7%	
つけっ放し	20,486	7.1%	
点けっぱなし	13,544	4.7%	
付けっ放し	10,705	3.7%	
点けっ放し	4,706	1.6%	
つけっぱなし	185,636	64.2%

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>つけっ放し</keb>
@@ -18,0 +16,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>つけっ放し</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -26,2 +27,2 @@
-<gloss>leaving a device on (e.g. TV, air conditioner)</gloss>
-<gloss>leaving something engaged (e.g. a key in a lock)</gloss>
+<gloss>leaving (a light, TV, etc.) on</gloss>
+<gloss>leaving engaged (e.g. a key in a lock)</gloss>

n-grams
つけっ放し	691
付けっぱなし	1937
点けっぱなし	639
付けっ放し	271
点けっ放し	110
つけっぱなし	7362

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>つけっ放し</keb>
+<keb>付けっぱなし</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>付けっぱなし</keb>
+<keb>つけっ放し</keb>
@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -21,3 +21,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1008020">っ放し・っぱなし・1</xref>
-<gloss>soaking something</gloss>
-<gloss>leaving something to soak</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1008020">っぱなし・1</xref>
+<gloss>leaving (something) to soak</gloss>

G-ngrams
  漬けっぱなし	1661
  浸けっぱなし	435
  漬けっ放し	213
  浸けっ放し	72

reordering

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>漬けっぱなし</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<keb>漬けっぱなし</keb>
+<keb>漬けっ放し</keb>
@@ -12,3 +14,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>漬けっ放し</keb>

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>浸けっぱなし</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>漬けっぱなし</keb>
+</k_ele>

The refs have the more general term first, but I agree with the swap.

@@ -12 +12,7 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1286100">告別式・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2827634">偲ぶ会</xref>
+<gloss>gathering to remember a deceased person</gloss>
+<gloss>memorial gathering</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1286100">告別式・2</xref>
@@ -16,6 +21,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2827634">偲ぶ会</xref>
-<gloss>gathering to remember a deceased person</gloss>
-<gloss>memorial gathering</gloss>

Google images are all sense 2, I think it should lead.

GG5: 〔従来の葬式とは別の告別の会〕 a farewelling; a final leave-taking.

Not really a euphemism. Trimming unnecessary xrefs.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1286100">告別式・1</xref>
@@ -19,3 +20 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1286100">告別式・1</xref>
-<misc>&euph;</misc>
-<gloss>memorial service</gloss>
+<gloss>gathering to remember a deceased person</gloss>
@@ -23,2 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>memorial meeting</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">gathering to remember a deceased person, pet, etc. (esp. more secular, social events)</gloss>

Sense[1] 別れ会い
鉄道研究部　お別れ会
https://www.hibari.jp/club/2020/02/aea80e707ddecb1b9982e969e0656526c5b3b3c8.html
Sense[1] 別れの会い
「高知南高等学校 お別れの会」卒業生大歓迎♪
https://hotkochi.co.jp/news/77887/

Buddhist:
法事	602565	71.6%
More secular/social events
お別れ会	144156	17.1%
お別れの会	27312	3.2%
偲ぶ会	64427	7.7%
お別れセレモニー	1528	0.2%
お別れのセレモニー	697	0.1%
偲ぶセレモニー	605	0.1%
Funeral (service):
告別式	219545

pet example, お別れ会
メモリアルホールでご家族だけでお別れ会｜ペット葬儀・ペット火葬
https://pet-tokyo.jp/blog/12964/

Another pet  お別れ会
お別れ会 ( ペットのお通夜 ) (i.e. "wake")
https://www.heiwakai.co.jp/funeral/altar/

お別れ会[2]　= 忍び会 (i.e. same thing):
https://sogi-navi.com/types/view_10402/
基本的にはお別れ会も偲ぶ会も同じ
お別れ会は、偲ぶ会と呼ばれることもあります。
お別れ会と偲ぶ会とは、表現の違いだけで、実質の目的や内容に明確な違いはなく、ほぼ同じといえます。

お別れの会[2]　= 忍び会 example with の (i.e. same thing):
https://e-stories.jp/faq/overview/
「お別れの会」と「偲ぶ会」の違い
「お別れの会」・「偲ぶ会」と「葬儀」との違いについて説明しましたが、「お別れの会」と「偲ぶ会」はどのように違うかについてもご説明します。
これらは表現の違いだけで、明確な定義はありません。　<-- Just different expressions, no real difference in meaning

https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/deceased
Dead and deceased both mean “no longer living,” but deceased is a gentler term, and people often use it when the person who died was close to them or when they are talking to someone who knew the person who died.

On the variant 別れの会
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=お別れの会
a home-going service <-- THIS is sense 2, should also apply to 別れ会

On 別れ会 (no entry for 偲ぶ会). eow.alc seems to have missed [2] entirely (at least explicitly)
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=別れ会
gathering to bid farewell to, goodbye party, farewell game, family send-off

A random, careful translation. Aligns お別れ会, 偲ぶ会,  "remembrance", "farewell party", "memorial service" all in one go:
2022/12/21のダニエルお誕生日/お別れ会（偲ぶ会）について December 21, 2022 Birthday Remembrance/Farewell Party for Daniel (Memorial Service)
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nathan-thompson-2a414757_20221221のダニエルお誕生日お別れ会偲ぶ会について-december-activity-7003963270743154689-kqYm/?originalSubdomain=jp

お別れの会と法事の違いとは？
https://www.ohanaclub.jp/ohaka/5807/
宗教色が薄いお別れの会　＜ー farewell party, with a light religious tone

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q11105753136
「偲ぶ会」はremembrance
「お別れ会」Farewell
We cordially invite your attendance to a (remembrance, farewell) event for our beloved teacher, Mr. ----- at (場所） on (日付) (時間). Please RSVP to (xxx @gmail.com).

These comments cover お別れ会, お別れの会, and 偲ぶ会.

Not to be overly personal (ok, overly personal) but my dog passed away unexpectedly this morning.  I asked a doctor what to do by phone, and he asked me if I wanted an おわいかい or not (I misheard him).  Figured it out though, so I've be digging around these terms. 

Note: the related term  告別式 is similarly split into two senses. 
(告別式 seems to usually appear with a more solumn, black, saying-farewell-to-the-deceased "funeral"-like sense )

Long story short:
お別れの会 = お別れ会, senses [1] and [2] 
お別れ会[2]　= 忍び会 (only one sense, nearly identical synonyms)
With maybe *one* exception: 偲ぶ会 doesn't seem especially applicable to pets (at least not commonly)
somewhat less frequent, セレモニー in place of 会
"deceased" is a tiny touchup since I am here. britannica confirms my intuition that this fits better with funerals.
google searches suggest the "funeral" usage [2] dominates [1] (especially with the の variant). Maybe they should be ordered in reverse.

=== End short version ===

I strongly think that a distinction between [1] and [2] adds clarity, even if [2] is essentially a euphemistic application of [1].  I think it makes the glosses and xrefs cleaner, and is unambiguous that this is a usable expression in both contexts.  We've already kind-of agreed on the existence of [2], which I just pulled from お別れの会.

I'd never heard the term "memorial meeting". Seems fine, but far less common than "memorial service", and a bit less common than the friendlier "memorial gathering". All of these describe the same activity.

"gathering to remember a dead person" should be expanded to "pet" (ペットの別れ会). "a dead person" is necessary in some form, somewhere, because we have a huge number of "memorial service" entries (war memorials, natural disasters, etc.). Only a handful are individual funeral/death specific and it would be good to distinguish them. I said "person, pet, etc..." but I don't know if anything actually comes after pet. Perhaps it's just "person or pet". 

home-going service/homegoing service are interesting glosses, and probably applicable in some cases, but they seem rather explicitly Christian

@@ -14,0 +15,10 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2827634">偲ぶ会</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1286100">告別式・1</xref>
+<misc>&euph;</misc>
+<gloss>memorial service</gloss>
+<gloss>memorial gathering</gloss>
+<gloss>memorial meeting</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">gathering to remember a deceased person, pet, etc. (esp. more secular, social events)</gloss>

Reverting to previous glosses. Needs references for "regardless of marital or familial status".

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<gloss>unmarried person</gloss>
+<gloss>single person</gloss>
+<gloss>bachelor</gloss>
+<gloss>spinster</gloss>

GG5: 単身者 〔独身者〕 an unmarried person; a singleton; (男) a single man; a bachelor; (女) a single woman; a spinster.

An edit like that needs to provide references.

regardless of marital or familial status

@@ -12,4 +12 @@
-<gloss>unmarried person</gloss>
-<gloss>single person</gloss>
-<gloss>bachelor</gloss>
-<gloss>spinster</gloss>
+<gloss>person living alone</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>bachelor</gloss>
+<gloss>spinster</gloss>

The meaning is not obvious from the definition of 単身 ("alone; unaided; away from home")
.
gg5

GG5: 偲ぶ会 a gathering to remember a dead person; a get-together in memory of 《Mr. Yokota》
- 黒岩氏を偲ぶ会を催した. We had a gathering to talk and reminisce about (the late) Mr. Kuroiwa.

It's not really a service, which usually means a religious ceremony. I think it was better as it was. Those xrefs are not really useful or relevant.

@@ -13,5 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2741520">お別れ会</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2741520">お別れ会</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1286100">告別式・1</xref>
-<gloss>memorial service</gloss>
-<gloss>memorial gathering</gloss>
+<gloss>gathering to remember a dead person</gloss>
@@ -19 +14,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">gathering to remember a deceased person (esp. more secular, social events. usu. not for pets)</gloss>

See notes on お別れ会。　

Cannot xref unapproved お別れ会[2], so if approved, that will need to be edited.

[expl] differs by excluding pets explicitly (lest it appear as a possible oversight).

"memorial" is more literal here and not euphemistic. Otherwise these terms appear to be used interchangeably. Professional services frequently write お別れ会(偲ぶ会), 
or  お別れ会・偲ぶ会.

@@ -13 +13,5 @@
-<gloss>gathering to remember a dead person</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2741520">お別れ会</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2741520">お別れ会</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1286100">告別式・1</xref>
+<gloss>memorial service</gloss>
+<gloss>memorial gathering</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +19 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">gathering to remember a deceased person (esp. more secular, social events. usu. not for pets)</gloss>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>しぬぶかい</reb>
+<reb>しのぶかい</reb>

GG5. From the n-grams this is by far the most common prenominal use of 偲ぶ.

See comments on うたた寝.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,2 +21 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1663100">うたた寝</xref>
-<gloss>falling asleep (in one's clothes)</gloss>
+<gloss>falling asleep in one's clothes</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ ごろ寝 │ 116,791 │ 51.3% │
│ ゴロ寝 │  76,208 │ 33.5% │ - add
│ 転寝　 │  34,808 │ 15.3% │
│ ごろね │  10,041 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ゴロ寝</keb>
@@ -17 +20 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1663100">うたた寝・うたたね</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1663100">うたた寝</xref>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daijs: 勢いが盛んで防ぎようがないもののたとえ。

I think it's always figurative.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>oft. used metaphorically</s_inf>
+<s_inf>used figuratively</s_inf>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<s_inf>oft. used metaphorically</s_inf>

gg5

i think that's implied.  used metaphorically the same way in both languages

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<gloss>rapidly expanding wildfire</gloss>
+<gloss>wildfire</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2741520">お別れ会・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2741520">お別れ会・1</xref>

Aligning.

@@ -13,3 +13,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2741520">お別れ会</xref>
-<gloss>gathering to remember a dead person</gloss>
-<gloss>memorial meeting</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2741520">お別れ会・2</xref>
+<gloss>gathering to remember a deceased person</gloss>
+<gloss>memorial gathering</gloss>

See notes on お別れ会.  This appears the have both senses, but by comparison the non-death-related "parting ceremony" seems quite, quite uncommon.

I have only added the xref. Can't do much until/unless it is approved in some form. Will need to be aligned with however the xref is settled.

I think this needs to be split into two senses, both of which reference the respective sense on お別れ会. "farewell party" might even be [rare], hard to say definitively, but it sure doesn't pop up in searches without hunting for it. (It may be that の is inherently more formal, so leans toward the solemn use?)

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2741520">お別れ会</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2741520">お別れ会</xref>

別れの会	27650
お別れの会	27312

Heard on the news, something like "in 
accordance with the wishes of the 
deceased, there will be no 別れの会 or しの
ぶ会"

https://www.shaso.jp/chiebukuro/qa_owakare
nokai_shinobukai_chigai/
「お別れの会」「偲ぶ会」と葬儀の違いは何か？

「お別れの会（偲ぶ会）」は、故人を偲び、別れを告げ
るためのセレモニーです。

I agree. I meant to delete it in the last edit.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2844866">安らかにお眠りください</xref>

What's the point of the  安らかにお眠りください xref? I think there's too many random xrefs being added recently. I think it will only make things confusing for users.

We don't usually use the general sense note to indicate other related forms in that way. If they are worth mentioning they should be made entries.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<s_inf>usu. as translation of English or Latin. also 〜眠ってください, 〜眠ってれ、〜眠ってね, etc.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. as translation of English or Latin</s_inf>

More common than this form (ください variants, without keigo お, so sharing the same 安らかに眠 prefix as this term）:
安らかにお眠りください　11894
安らかにお眠り下さい　　6733
安らかに眠ってください　7414
安らかに眠って下さい　　4138	  

This form:
安らかに眠れ	9740	 <- imperative direct 眠れ

安らかに眠ってね	2197	  Friendly imperative ってね
安らかに眠ってくれ	1899	  Friendly imperative (step down from kudasai)

Here is an explicitly Christian usage ("went to heaven") with the friendly 眠ってね form.
(warning, young woman, sad post)
https://twitter.com/hoshina_mizuki/status/1131520280076070913

lots of pets get this form as well.

Explanation of differences and dangers careless mix/match of 安らかに眠れ and ご冥福をお祈りします. (I have no idea how offended any Japanese person would be in practice with screwing this up, but at the death of someone's loved on, it's probably worth attempting to handle this with care)
https://www.e-denpo.net/column/a045
冥福 is buddhist: そもそも「ご冥福」とは、仏教に基づいたお悔やみの言葉です。「冥」は死後の世界（冥土）、「福」は幸福のことを表し、「ご冥福」は故人の死後の幸せを指す言葉として使われています。
安らかに眠れ is christian: キリスト教の場合、...「安らかなお眠りをお祈り申し上げます」「平安をお祈り致します」「安らかな旅立ちになりますよう、心からお祈り申し上げます」

In the case of this aquarium seal, I guess the farewell reflects the religion of the commenter over the religion of the seal (we see both expressions):
https://twitter.com/TOBA_AQUARIUM/status/1608357296735649792
1. クチャちゃん🦭どうか安らかに。 <---- here's one I haven't covered. I've seen the どうか prefix elsewhere as well.
2. クチャさん安らかにお眠り下さい🙏 天国からみんなの事見守って下さい。  Includes 天国, prayer hands emoji, and 安らかに
3. ご冥福をお祈りします
4. クチャさんのご冥福を心よりお祈り申し上げます。
5. 心より御冥福をお祈りします

use site:"twitter.com" "安らかにお眠り下さい" (or whatever) to find examples if you don't have twitter search.  The pure "latin" form seems to mostly yield over references to the concept of RIP. All other forms seem to be actual fair-wells to people (or pets, etc.) who have died.

安らかに眠れ does seem to be the "pure" latin equivalent of RIP for ceremonial or marketing purposes. But it's really just a calque of the command "rest in peace", and *all* of the various Japanese command-form variations seem to exist. (って下さい、ってくれ、って、ってね), and several are more popular/practical than this one in daily use. 

Also, the internet suggests to me that this term is Christian, and "ご冥福をお祈りします" is Buddhist (which makes it the "common" term only insomuch as Japan is not a Christian nation).  Minimally adding [fld=christn] and [fld=buddh] may serve as some kind of warning that these are not strictly equivalent.

This also suggests that the entire gloss "Rest in peace" on ご冥福をお祈りします is perhaps unwise (though common), as it is essentially suggesting the wrong religion entirely. (how can "happiness in the next life" = "rest", I wondered).  Certainly for a culture-modifying localization, "Rest in Piece" is a fine day-to-day equivalent if you're talking about characters in a film, but maybe not ideal if you're addressing a Christian in Japan.  (And 安らかにお眠りください might not be great when addressing a Buddhist)

Essentially I think I'm agreeing with Robin's 2019 comment that picking the wrong term "would be a big error," but I think there is some religious nuance here, and that this term is "correct" for the (3%?) of the Christian population here. Double-checked, 1.5%.

One extra form (found on the twitter seal reference):
どうか安らかに	9055	  (often ends at に)
どうか安らかにお眠り	2126	 (but not always)
どうか安らかに眠って	1116

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2844866">安らかにお眠りください</xref>
@@ -14 +15,2 @@
-<s_inf>usu. as translation of English or Latin</s_inf>
+<field>&Christn;</field>
+<s_inf>usu. as translation of English or Latin. also 〜眠ってください, 〜眠ってれ、〜眠ってね, etc.</s_inf>

yeah, that's fair.  i definitely think it should be an entry, but the note is perhaps warranted

Comments on 安らかに眠れ

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<field>&Christn;</field>

There are actually quite a few variants that are used:
安らかに眠ってください	7414 <- example in 中辞典
安らかに眠って下さい	4138
安らかに眠れる	4233
安らかに眠る	6475

安らかにお眠り	19735
安らかにお眠りください	11894
安らかにお眠り下さい	6733
安らかに御眠り下さい	65


どうか安らかにお眠り	2195


安らかに眠れ	9740

On the "安らかに眠れ" entry, Robin said "This is not an expression that's actually used in Japanese", but at least this expression 
is definitely used in Japanese.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1008020">っぱなし・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1008020">っぱなし・2</xref>

使いっぱなし	8,201	93.1%	
使いっ放し	605	6.9%

It's not col.
We have entries for つけっぱなし, 開けっ放し, 借りっぱなし.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>使いっ放し</keb>
@@ -12,2 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1008020">っ放し・っぱなし</xref>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
+<xref type="see" seq="1008020">っぱなし</xref>

使いっぱなし	8201	  
MeCab/Unidic treats it as 使い + っぱなし

See sense 2 of 2857479.

Looks OK.
On Twitter, 過去いち is significantly less common than the other forms.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23 +24,2 @@
-<s_inf>from 過去１番</s_inf>
+<s_inf>abbr. of 過去１番</s_inf>
+<gloss>most ... ever</gloss>
@@ -25 +27 @@
-<gloss>... ever</gloss>
+<gloss>more ... than ever before</gloss>

Bumping since this seems have to been lost to time. Should be good to go in.

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>... ever</gloss>

* wikt: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/かこいち
* https://numan.tokyo/words/pWY5K/
* https://meaning.jp/posts/749

Improvements welcome.

Might be a while. Kim is busy on a major new version and relatively minor issues may not be addressed in the current version.

Just noting that this hasn't been fixed yet.

Thanks. I've notified Kim. Other entries are the same.

That's odd. It seems that jisho.org doesn't display readings for any word that has Roman letters in the kanji field. Jim, can you let them know?

A page has been created at https://jisho.org/word/ガクブル but there's only letters appears instead of the katakanas. Would it possible to update the page for this word?

枝の主日	1755	68.3%
棕櫚の主日	505	19.6%
聖枝祭	310	12.1%
https://kotobank.jp/word/聖枝祭-1349439
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/エルサレム入城の日 - "日本では教派により、枝の主日（日曜日）、棕櫚の主日、聖枝祭などと違った名称なので、この記事名を使う。 "

That Jisho page is from Wikipedia (as it says).
May as well have it.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>palm sunday</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2858019">枝の主日</xref>
+<field>&Christn;</field>
+<gloss>Palm Sunday</gloss>

https://jisho.org/search/聖枝祭 

The page has been created but there are mention of the prononciation for the word. Would it be possible to add itM

"mie goreng" appears to be the most common spelling online. Also used on Wikipedia.

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>mee goreng (Indonesian stir-fried noodle dish)</gloss>
+<gloss>mie goreng (Indonesian stir-fried noodle dish)</gloss>
+<gloss>mee goreng</gloss>

Mee goreng 6405
Mie goreng 787
Mi goreng 817

I think this works and is simpler.

@@ -13,3 +13,3 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="ind">mi goreng</lsource>
-<gloss>mie goreng (Indonesian stir-fried noodle dish)</gloss>
-<gloss>mee goreng</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="ind"/>
+<gloss>mee goreng (Indonesian stir-fried noodle dish)</gloss>
+<gloss>mi goreng</gloss>

* daijs: https://kotobank.jp/word/ミーゴレン-637009 (puts an accented é on "goreng", but not seeing that anywhere else)
* KOD

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mie_goreng

ワンランク上	967262
ワンランク上は	70
ワンランク上が	339

You're right. It's not a noun.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

Is this really n? Or just adj-no?

ワンランク	1075901	  
ワンランク上	967091	  
ワンランク上の	822925
GG5, etc. examples.
ワンランクじょう	33	6.5%
ワンランクうえ	475	93.5%

The main use of ワンランク.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>a cut above</gloss>
-<gloss>a rank above</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>one rank above</gloss>
@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>one rank higher</gloss>

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ワンランクじょう</reb>
+<reb>ワンランクうえ</reb>

「美しい日本語の書き方・話し方」 （ISBN: 9784415035833）. Forgot the page number, but it was used in the manner of ワンランク上のあいさつ as a section title  and in the body of the text.

daijr/s

リクルーティング	20152

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>daytime session (school, university)</gloss>
+<gloss>daytime session (of a school, university, etc.)</gloss>

夜間部	36908
昼間部	26214
Daijs. Nikk

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>daytime schooling</gloss>
+<gloss>daytime session (school, university)</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/昼間部-1711293

I don't think so, as 誤配 already means "misdelivery".
Aligning with 誤配. I don't think the parenthesised part is needed.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>misdelivery (of post, etc. to the wrong recipient)</gloss>
+<gloss>misdelivery</gloss>

Possibly could go either way. I tried the following sentence in MeCab: "いままでは誤配達の経験はないのですが、これも民営化の影響でしょうか。"  The parse was " ... は+誤配+達+の...".

It's 誤 + 配達, not 誤配 + 達.

達/たつ is usually a notification, but we don't explicitly have it as an entry.
I think it's worth keeping.

誤配達	5,160		
誤配	44,744

Not sure it's needed. A+B. Less common than 誤配.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬─────╮
│ キャロットラペ　 │ 402 │
│ キャロット・ラペ │ 283 │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴─────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キャロット・ラペ</reb>

Seen on the label of a convenience store sandwich: 
「バゲットサンド・マスタードチキンとキャロットラペ
Baguette Sandwich, Mustard Chicken and Grated Carrot」

Found several recipes online, such as https://www.nhk.or.jp/shutoken/recipe/gohan/20181023.html :「タンドリーチキンとキャロットラペ」

Wikipedia has an entry 「キャロットラペ」: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/キャロットラペ

Suburb of Sapporo.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<misc>&product;</misc>
+<misc>&work;</misc>

Netflix

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+<sense>
+<misc>&product;</misc>
+<gloss>Ainosato (TV show)</gloss>
+</sense>

Unlikely

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ティンカー・ベル

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬────────╮
│ ティンカーベル　 │ 94,389 │
│ ティンカー・ベル │ 12,272 │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴────────╯