0 n-grams. Not in refs.

I think this can go.

daij, meikyo, smk

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<stagr>パッキング</stagr>
@@ -14 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>packing</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>packing (items in a suitcase, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -18,2 +20,5 @@
-<gloss>non-metallic seal</gloss>
-<gloss>washer</gloss>
+<gloss>packing (material for protecting packed goods)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>packing (material for sealing a joint)</gloss>

prog

パッキングし　 21,203 81.6%
パッキングをし  4,781 18.4%

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

Shouldn't have self-approved it, my bad.

gg5, daij, meikyo

I think Marcus misread the definition.

@@ -19 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>vertical shaking (of an earthquake)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1146900">ローリング・1</xref>
+<gloss>pitching (of a ship, aircraft, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>pitch</gloss>

mk
縦揺れ

doesn't seem to me like "pitching" is used in the sense 2 context in English?

@@ -10,0 +11,2 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<field>&baseb;</field>
@@ -12,0 +15,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>vertical shaking (of an earthquake)</gloss>
+</sense>

https://kotobank.jp/word/ラプソディ-147628

ラプソディ　 106,554 56.5%
ラプソディー  82,103 43.5%

狂詩曲 88,383

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ラプソディ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<field>&music;</field>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

daij, koj meikyo, sankoku

@@ -16,0 +17,5 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1927830">ロールパン</xref>
+<gloss>(bread) roll</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -25 +30,8 @@
-<gloss>rolling (of a ship, aircraft, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>roll (of a ship, aircraft, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2226660">ロールフィルム</xref>
+<field>&photo;</field>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>roll film</gloss>

daij, meikyo

Different source word so it needs to be a separate entry. I'll create one.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>rolling up</gloss>
@@ -15,2 +17,9 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>role</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1146860">ローラー</xref>
+<gloss>roller</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1146900">ローリング・1</xref>
+<gloss>rolling (of a ship, aircraft, etc.)</gloss>

役を演じる	95391	77.0%
役割を演じる	14080	11.4%
ロールを演じる	189	0.2%
役目を演じる	150	0.1%
任務を演じる	0	0.0%
会社の役目	643	0.5%
会社の任務	123	0.1%
会社の役	798	0.6%
会社の役割	8103	6.5%
会社のロール	0	0.0%
管理役割	840	0.7%
管理役	2369	1.9%
管理ロール	841	0.7%
管理役目	0	0.0%
管理任務	128	

Is this really 任務?
任務を遂行する	21996	49.9%
任務を果たし	9111	20.7%
任務を終え	12909	29.3%
ロールを遂行する	0	0.0%
ロールを果たし	21	0.0%
ロールを終え	0	0.0%


役目を担った	43012	100.0%
ロールを担った	0	0.0%

Not sure if this needs a separate entry.  I think "roll" is "common", but "role" probably is not.

sankoku:
ロール. role 役。役割。

daijs:

デジタル大辞泉デジタル大辞泉
ロール【role】
読み方：ろーる
役割。役目。任務。「—プレーイングゲーム」

A lot of use seems to be relatively modern coinages. 管理ロール is interesting. I think many of this are computer-system derived:
https://helpx.adobe.com/jp/enterprise/using/admin-roles.html

(Was looking for "role in a company", and while maybe you could use ロール for that, it seems like it would be somewhat odd/uncommon).

I feel like a "this is what you should use instead xref" would be nice, so long as they are synonymous in the first place.  between sankoku and daijs, 役, 役割, 役目 , 任務 are tossed out there. Not sure what, if anything, would be most appropriate. 

[rare] is an attempt to scare people into finding a different Japanese word.  But I'm not so sure "rare" is actually fair though. Maybe too common for that. Hard to count occurrences of ロール = "role" that aren't part of a larger word. (role playing, etc).

Well, I leave it to you.

@@ -12,0 +13,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>role</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, prog, wisdom
うかがい知れない	4,990

うかがい知れない is also quite common. I don't think a note is needed here. It would be difficult to make it concise.
Dropping 窺いしる.

@@ -13,4 +12,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>窺いしる</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -23,2 +18,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1172230">窺う・うかがう・3</xref>
-<s_inf>esp. ~ことができる・できない</s_inf>
@@ -26 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>to guess (correctly, based on available evidence)</gloss>
@@ -28 +21,8 @@
-<gloss>to perceive</gloss>
+<gloss>to get an idea of</gloss>
+<gloss>to tell</gloss>
+<gloss>to imagine</gloss>
+<gloss>to guess</gloss>
+<gloss>to grasp</gloss>
+<gloss>to fathom</gloss>
+<gloss>to understand</gloss>
+<gloss>to know</gloss>

うかがい知る	29022	43.2%
窺い知る	22294	33.2%
伺い知る	15834	23.6%
窺いしる	40	0.1%

https://proverb-encyclopedia.com/dictionary/ukagaisiru/
表面に現れていない事柄についておおよその見当をつける。察知する。



うかがい知る	29022	  
うかがい知ること	23967	   <-- look at how common this is (beginning of ことが出来る　ことが出来る
うかがい知ることが	17999	  
うかがい知ることができ	7874	 

https://hinative.com/questions/215004
What does うかがい知る mean?
nobu_japan
figure out


joealvo
10 Nov 2015
 Japanese
うかがい知る＝to guess about something that's hidden behind/that lays behind what you can see/what you know
広辞苑(Koujien) says:
表面に現れていない事柄について、おおよその検討をつけること

彼は無表情だったので、彼の感情をうかがい知ることはできなかった。
I couldn't see what he was feeling inside because he was showing no expressions on his face.

reverso:
You can figure out the class of vegetarians from the twofold increase in the number of vegetarians over the past 10 years...
菜食主義者の層を窺い知ることが出来ます。 (also dekiru)


https://dict.line.me/enjadict/search?range=example&query=guess what
You can guess what the current situation of emergency medical service is like through [from] the results of this survey. → うかがいしる[窺い知る]
この調査結果から救急医療の実態をうかがい知ることができる

Definitions are all about knowing an under-the-surface fact based on the information one is able to see (inference). 

"to infer" is already baked into 窺う。 Reverso often glosses things like うかがい知ることができる as "able to guess" with the implication that the "guess" is correct. 知る may also be adding that nuance.

sankoku's example also uses the うかがい知ることができる structure (他人にはうかがい知ることができない). 
defn: 外に現れたことから、中の様子を知る。

proverb-encyclopedia gives a synonym of 察知, which we gloss as:
to sense; to infer; to gather; to pick up on; to get wind of; to perceive

These seem consistent with the many examples in reverso.

As a gloss, "understand" in particular seems to discard all sense of nuance. (I am sure there are situations it could be used, but it doesn't seem like a particularly good general choice).

The great majority of reverso examples (and there are a good number) are of the ことが出来る・できない　structure
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/うかがい知る

The volunteered hinative example also used this structure, as did the random examples I found when looking for evidence of "figure out".

"to see" , as in "are able to see, are unable to see..." is actually one of the most common reverso glosses.  I'm sure my "to guess" parenthetical remark already doesn't look great. I'm not sure what I'd want to add "too see" to this list.　　Similar for "to tell", "they couldn't tell what he was thinking (because his displayed no outward signs")

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,0 +23,5 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1172230">窺う・うかがう・3</xref>
+<s_inf>esp. ~ことができる・できない</s_inf>
+<gloss>to infer</gloss>
+<gloss>to guess (correctly, based on available evidence)</gloss>
+<gloss>to figure out</gloss>
@@ -23 +28,0 @@
-<gloss>to understand</gloss>

Ngrams, GG5 (窺い知る as headword, うかがい知る in examples.)

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>うかがい知る</keb>
+</k_ele>

伺い知る gets more hits

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<keb>窺いしる</keb>
+<keb>伺い知る</keb>
@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<keb>伺い知る</keb>
+<keb>窺いしる</keb>

We don't usually have x-refs to words that have a different part of speech.

@@ -14,2 +13,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1172220">うかがい知る・うかがいしる</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1172220">うかがい知る・うかがいしる</xref>
@@ -17 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>perception</gloss>
+<gloss>inference</gloss>
+<gloss>deduction</gloss>
+<gloss>figuring out</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>knowing</gloss>

窺知	581	2.0%
窺知する	113	0.4%
うかがい知る	29022	97.7%

を窺知	208	  
を窺知する	75	  
を窺知し	47	  
を窺知すること	27	  
を窺知することが	25	<- here comes. ことができなかった

sankoku: うかがい知ること

sankoku says 文, 他さ defines as 窺い知る which seems perfectly reasonable. comparatively rare.
Example sentence: 事実の一端を窺知しえた。

should update glosses if/when xref glosses change.

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1172220">うかがい知る・うかがいしる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1172220">うかがい知る・うかがいしる</xref>
+<misc>&form;</misc>

I don't think it's adj-no. No 〜の examples in the JEs, and the top 確定の n-gram terms aren't adjectival. We have an entry for 確定的.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

No reference was given for the extra sense. Not in JEs or kokugos.
確定	7871787
確定した	468696
確定な	117225
確定の	267280

More likely to be 確定した or 確定の.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -25,7 +25,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>definite</gloss>
-<gloss>fixed</gloss>
-<gloss>final</gloss>

@@ -24,0 +25,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>definite</gloss>
+<gloss>fixed</gloss>
+<gloss>final</gloss>

GG5

No. Best dropped.

@@ -23,8 +23,2 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<field>&math;</field>
-<gloss>definition</gloss>
+<gloss>confirmation</gloss>
+<gloss>establishment</gloss>

Is there a source for sense 2?

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<field>&music;</field>

It's not in any of my refs.

I suspect this is not worth keeping.

窺い探る	0	0.0%
伺い探る	0	0.0%
うかがい探る	24	100.0%

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

gg5, prog, luminous, daijr/s, sankoku

I think the "participation" sense should lead. All the Tanaka sentences are for this sense.
Added sense (not in the JEs).

@@ -20,2 +20,5 @@
-<gloss>(stage) appearance</gloss>
-<gloss>performance</gloss>
+<gloss>participation (in a tournament, match, race, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>entry</gloss>
+<gloss>taking part (in)</gloss>
+<gloss>competing (in)</gloss>
+<gloss>appearance</gloss>
@@ -27 +30 @@
-<gloss>participation (e.g. in a tournament)</gloss>
+<gloss>appearance (on the stage, television, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -33,0 +37 @@
+<gloss>exiting (a venue, train station, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -35 +39,6 @@
-<gloss>exiting</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>being dispatched (of an ambulance, fire engine, etc.)</gloss>

Better to lead with the straight noun, as with 入場.

@@ -33,0 +34 @@
+<gloss>exit</gloss>

４ 改札口・出入り口などを通って、場内・構内から外へ出ること。
sounds more like "exiting" than "exit" to me

@@ -34 +34 @@
-<gloss>exit</gloss>
+<gloss>exiting</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/出場-528933

Saw it on the subway 改札.

@@ -28,0 +29,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1466360">入場</xref>
+<gloss>exit</gloss>
+</sense>

I don't think so. We already have 援ける and I think 左ける might be a mistake for 佐ける. It gets 0 n-grams.

Should there be a note for sense 2? 
daijr ②: （「援ける」「左ける」などとも書く）他人を補佐して，事がうまく運ぶようにする。助力する。手伝う。

佐ける is also in shinmeikai and nikk. 輔ける is also in koj. Probably best to keep them visible.

I think those last 3 can be sK.

prog, etc.

助ける　 1,432,784 98.4%
援ける　     1,644  0.1% <- meikyo
救ける　       803  0.1% <- iwanami only
扶ける　       789  0.1% <- meikyo
佐ける　        90  0.0% <- daijs
佑ける　        23  0.0% <- daijs
輔ける　       121  0.0% <- daijs
たすける    19,990  1.4%

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +24 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,0 +28 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -26,0 +32 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -38,0 +45 @@
+<gloss>to spare</gloss>

gg5, prog, luminous, wisdom

I think "energy conservation" is too broad.

@@ -19,2 +19,4 @@
-<gloss>conservation of electricity</gloss>
-<gloss>energy conservation</gloss>
+<gloss>saving electricity</gloss>
+<gloss>power saving</gloss>
+<gloss>reducing electricity usage</gloss>
+<gloss>reducing power consumption</gloss>

brownout seems very wrong

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>brownout</gloss>
+<gloss>energy conservation</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, luminous, wisdom, daijr

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>retirement age</gloss>
+<gloss>(compulsory) retirement age</gloss>
+<gloss>age limit</gloss>
@@ -28,2 +28,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1943160">定年退職・ていねんたいしょく</xref>
-<gloss>(compulsory) retirement (e.g. on reaching the age of 65)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1943160">定年退職</xref>
+<gloss>(compulsory) retirement (on reaching retirement age)</gloss>
+<gloss>mandatory retirement</gloss>
@@ -31,0 +33 @@
+<stagk>停年</stagk>
@@ -33,2 +35,2 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>years of service in a military rank before eligibility for promotion</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>minimum years of service at a particular rank before eligibility for promotion (in the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy)</gloss>

sankoku: 名・自さ。退官・退職することになっている、一定のとし（になること）
trans. mine: In the state resulting from having to retire (through actions out of one's control), at a prescribed age

daijs confirms [1],[2], [vs]:
［名］(スル)法規・規則により、一定の年齢到達を事由に退官・退職することになっている年齢。(sense 1)また、退官・退職すること(sense 2)。「―を迎える」

定年後	532914	  
定年後の再雇用	181396	

定年	2240583	
定年した	4286	  
定年したら	2306	  
定年した後	382	  
定年したばかり	373	  
定年した人	320
定年したばかりな	249	  
定年したばかりなの	247	  
定年した父	173	 

Compare:
定年した人	320
定年になった人	364	  


高齢人材は「お荷物」か「助っ人」か　タニタ、セブンの選択
https://business.nikkei.com/atcl/NBD/19/special/00735/
今から11年前、タニタ総研は60歳で定年した後の再雇用の受け皿会社として設立。定年を迎えた社員の再雇用の受け皿として、子会社や関連会社を活用する会社は多い。

I suspect this evolved as a shorthand for the xref (and similar related terms).

Far more than the not-so-common する usage, you can see from the n-grams on
定年後の再雇用 181396

that 定年後 means "after retirement/after having to retire", not "after reaching retirement age". 

Perhaps [1] should add (compulsory) as well.

Looking at a number of reverso examples (which lean heavily toward "retirement age"), I don't think [1] and [2] are the same sense, related though they may be. 
[1] is a number. "retirement age is 60, 65, 70"... "retire before reaching retirement age".  It's a noun with no straightforward する verb equivalent.
[2] is the act of retiring/having been retired at a fixed age.

@@ -25,0 +26,7 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1943160">定年退職・ていねんたいしょく</xref>
+<gloss>(compulsory) retirement (e.g. on reaching the age of 65)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

定年	2241679
停年	16082 (mk)

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5, luminous, daijr, meikyo

@@ -16 +16,7 @@
-<gloss>the same firm</gloss>
+<gloss>the same company</gloss>
+<gloss>the said firm</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>the same (Shinto) shrine</gloss>
+<gloss>the said shrine</gloss>

RP has 任務 as a gloss for role.

Would be really handy for this to come up in a search for "role". (literally as in "office role", which is what I was trying to find)

Reverso seems to think it's an appropriate gloss(73 examples).
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/任務#role

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>role</gloss>

gg5, prog, luminous

@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>infeasible</gloss>
+<gloss>unreal</gloss>

https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/非現実的

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=非現実的

Was specifically looking for a term for "impractical".  Wasn't sure about the entries here, and searched reverso and found this.

Reverso is roughly 50/50 unrealistic/impractical.  Since 現実的 is already "realistic, pragmatic", this would seems consistent. (not pragmatic = impractical)

alc has a laundry list of possibilities. Might be worth taking a glance, though the seem to have grabbed every conceivable synonym for this term.  But, "impractical" is on the list as:
impractical（計画・考え・目標などが）

"impractical goal" is exactly what I was looking for. Don't know if parentheticals are needed here or not , i.e.
impractical (e.g. plan, goal, etc.)

One of the glosses is "pie in the sky" :) That makes more sense for a E->J dictionary I think, but it does seem to back up the meaning I was going for.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>impractical</gloss>

Jwiki too.

Maybe rK?

https://gimon-sukkiri.jp/zero-twentyfour/

Confusing when used with the numeral.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>０時</keb>

daijr/s, nikk, prog, Luminous, 新和英中辞典

@@ -16,1 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>12 o'clock (midnight)</gloss>
+<gloss>twelve o'clock</gloss>
+<gloss>midnight</gloss>
+<gloss>noon</gloss>

* gg5 subentry: boiled rice with raw [salmon] soaked in tea.
* "Salmon ochazuke is a traditional Japanese dish of steamed rice … topped with grilled salmon and tea." (https://www.thespruceeats.com/salmon-ochazuke-rice-with-tea-2030906)

鮭茶漬け　　 8,922 95.2%
鮭茶づけ　　   164  1.7%
さけちゃづけ   290  3.1%

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>鮭茶づけ</keb>
+<keb>鮭茶漬け</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>鮭茶漬け</keb>
+<keb>鮭茶づけ</keb>
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>chazuke with salmon powder</gloss>
+<gloss>chazuke with salmon</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>chadzuke with salmon powder</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1597520">茶漬け</xref>
+<gloss>chazuke with salmon powder</gloss>

* gg5: the Adam's apple.
* prog: the [one's] Adam's apple
* genius: Adam's apple
* concise: the Adam's apple.
* example sentence: ジョージののどぼとけは信じられないぐらい大きい。 George has an incredibly large Adam's apple.
* saito: Adam's apple

喉仏　　　 18,518 60.5%
のど仏　　  5,730 18.7%
のどぼとけ  6,337 20.7%
アダムのリンゴ 409

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>Adam's apple</gloss>
@@ -17 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>Adam's apple</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<field>&anat;</field>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ピッチング

@@ -21 +21,3 @@
-<gloss>pitching (of a boat, aircraft, etc.)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1106790">ピッチング・2</xref>
+<gloss>pitch (of a ship, aircraft, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>pitching</gloss>

mk

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daij, gg5

Two senses in the refs.

@@ -16 +16,5 @@
-<gloss>pitching</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>pitching (of a boat, aircraft, etc.)</gloss>

@@ -13 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>(with respect to an earthquake) vertical shake</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1719720">横揺れ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1719720">横揺れ</xref>
+<gloss>vertical shaking (of an earthquake)</gloss>

gg5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&zool;</field>

daijr/s:「ぼんでん」とも

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Can't see ぼんでん in refs.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

The hindu god ブラフマー:
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ブラフマー
(critical note at bottom: 日本では「梵天」という名で知られる[48]。)

The buddhist god 梵天:
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/梵天

Hindu:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahma
Buddhist:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmā_(Buddhism)

I'm aligning [1] with 梵天王 and ブラフマー by adding the word "creator", which seems reasonable enough.

After that, I am suggesting some important (and less-important)changes, but not doing anything on this myself....

I think this needs one more sense for the Buddhist god, whose role differs from the Hindu God.  It may be the case that 梵天王 applies to one and not the other.  It appears to *actually* be the case that ブラフマー refers only to the Hindu God, not the Buddhist God. (Buddhist god seems to *not* be a creator god... haven't studied in depth).

Wikipedia in English and Japanese both have completely separate pages for the Hindu and Buddhist gods, with the proviso that in Japanese, there is a page for 梵天 (Buddhist), and a Page for ブラフマー(Hindu) which ends with a line stating "In Japan, ブラフマー is known as 梵天". 

sankoku has only three entries: 1. Indian god, 2. Buddhist god, 3. puffy thing at end of ear pick.  Does not have an entry for ブラフマー.

The ear pick thing is real. You can even get fluffy balls back from an image search of ぼんてん, so this may even be a bit broader than the earpick usage.  Happy shopping:
http://www.ltlt.co.jp/product/1158/
This website discusses the use of 梵天 for carpet color matching? and it brings up the dictionary definitions of 梵天 and 天竺 to speculate how this meaning might have come about... 
https://www.sincol-kys.co.jp/blog/carpet/2351/

I have not yet found any examples of [3], though I'm sure they must be out there.  But sankoku doesn't list [3], and I suspect it might be [rare] or otherwise historical.

To complicate matters, wikipedia verifies the ear pick thing *and* gives another orthography.
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/耳掻き
梵天（凡天、ぼんてん）

AND, earpick may not have the ぼんでん reading. (sankoku doesn't give ぼんでん at all for any of this, ぼんてん　image search returns fluffy balls, ぼんでん returns a Hindu/Buddhist god).

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>Brahma (Hindu god)</gloss>
+<gloss>Brahma (Hindu creator god)</gloss>

Thanks. Seems a reasonable selection.

daijr/s: 「ぼんでん」とも
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ear_pick#Embellishments

Added the senses in meikyo and shinmeikai.
I don't think the 耳かき x-ref is needed.

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ぼんでん</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -12 +15 @@
-<gloss>Brahma-Deva</gloss>
+<gloss>Brahma (Hindu god)</gloss>
@@ -16,2 +19,10 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1817040">耳かき・1</xref>
-<gloss>fluffy ball on the end of an earpick</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1270620">御幣</xref>
+<gloss>large staff with plaited paper streamers (used at religious festivals or as a sign)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>buoy (used in longline fishing, gillnetting, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>down puff (on the end of an ear pick)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2857878">到着時間</xref>

GG5, etc.

A bit clearer.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>starting (departure) time</gloss>
+<gloss>departure time</gloss>
+<gloss>starting time</gloss>

定年退職	542,256	99.5%	
停年退職	2,914	0.5%

I agree with Brian regarding "reaching retirement age".

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17 +18 @@
-<gloss>(compulsory) retirement (e.g. on reaching the age of 65)</gloss>
+<gloss>(compulsory) retirement (on reaching retirement age)</gloss>
@@ -19 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>reaching retirement age</gloss>

https://www.boj.or.jp/en/about/press/koen_2019/ko190306a.htm

Improvements in Employment of Women and the Elderly
[paragraph on women]

Moreover, Chart 2 also shows that employment of the elderly has been growing. However, in the case of the elderly, the share of non-regular employees has been rising. The reason is likely that many are hired as temporary or part-time workers after reaching retirement age. Because Japan's population is aging, this means that it is unlikely that the share of non-regular employees in employment as a whole will decrease. However, looking at employees between 15 and 64 years of age, the share of non-regular employees has been declining since around 2014.

また、同じ図2に見るように、高齢者の雇用も伸びています。ただし、高齢者の場合は、非正規の割合が上昇しています。これは定年退職後、嘱託や非常勤として雇われる高齢者が多いからだと思われます。日本は高齢化が進んでいる訳ですから、このことは、雇用全体として非正規の割合が低下することが難しいということを意味します。しかし、15－64歳までの雇用者を見れば、2014年頃から、非正規の割合が低下しています。

Small note of little importance, the previous translation coincidentally ran into my  嘱託(社員) edit. The workers were probably "RE-hired after reaching (mandatory) retirement age".  

And I found the original source.
https://www.boj.or.jp/en/about/press/koen_2019/ko190306a.htm

I was going to suggest that context probably made things clear. Instead, it looks like this is an official Japanese translation of a Japanese source document that dropped some (perhaps non-critical) nuances.

定年退職	542157	  
定年退職し	73046	  
定年退職した	34855	 

daijs: suru
［名］(スル)一定の年齢に達したことを事由に退職すること。「65歳で会社を―する」

Add [vs,vi] 

If it were me, I wouldn't have added the GG5 gloss of "reaching retirement age".  It definitely works in some contexts, but this term doesn't mean "turned 65".  It means "turned 65 and had to retire".  In English, I feel like even after saying "After reaching retirement age...", you would *still* have to add "...she left the company (...and started a small business)".  

Take this reverso translation:
これは定年退職後、嘱託や非常勤として雇われる高齢者が多いからだと思われます。
"The reason is likely that many are hired as temporary or part-time workers after reaching retirement age."

I feel like the translator lost a step. I think "after mandatory retirement" would have been clearer.

Also, you can "reach retirement age" without being employed. You definitely need a job to 定年退職. (One more reason why the previous translation ends up ambiguous).

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphics_tablet

@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>graphics tablet</gloss>
+<gloss>drawing tablet</gloss>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙
pen tablet 54811

Feels wasei-ish but it's not.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&comp;</field>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ペン・タブレット</reb>

It's 2nd gloss in GG5.

Procedures for Entry/ Residence
https://www.moj.go.jp/content/001291262.pdf
A foreign national, when he / she is recognized as a refugee, is issued a Certificate of Refugee Status, and 
---> is granted a residence status of “Long Term Resident” etc.

Looked for "residence status", couldn't find, checked my residence card to find 在留資格, looked it up and found this entry.

I think "residence status" is so common colloquially that it is worth having here just for lookup purposes ("status of residence" is both more common, and more technically correct, if there is such a thing).

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>residence status</gloss>

That qualification ("in Japan") is probably not necessary?

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>status of residence (in Japan)</gloss>
+<gloss>status of residence</gloss>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>residence qualification</gloss>
+<gloss>immigration status</gloss>

Entry created

gg5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&photo;</field>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ロール・フィルム</reb>

Entry created

I don't think "flight time" is needed. The JEs don't have it.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1938140">出発時間</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1944010">到着時刻</xref>
@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>flight time</gloss>

Entry created

daijs
グラフィックタブレット	229		
ペンタブレット	        87,133

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1982410">ペンタブレット</xref>
@@ -13 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>graphic tablet</gloss>
+<gloss>graphics tablet</gloss>
+<gloss>drawing tablet</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>グラフィック・タブレット</reb>

Entry created

Moi non plus.

I didn't know what "butter roll" meant.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>butter-enriched bread roll</gloss>

Very much an American thing.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

Google

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">butter roll</lsource>
-<gloss>butter-enriched roll</gloss>
+<gloss>butter roll</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バター・ロール</reb>

(I haven't looked at Brian's edit)

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

I have comments already on 針の穴から天覗く, but I ran into an article on this term specifically, and as you might imagine, the definitions are basically identical:

https://landofnu.com/2016/10/09/3250/
Forming opinions and making decisions on a topic based on one’s narrow views and pre-formed beliefs rather than any sort of breadth or depth of experience. Making judgments about big issues based on little information, often in a self-serving way. Having a view as narrow as what can be seen through the hollow stem of a reed after the pith has dried up.

This saying is the よ entry of the Edo iroha karuta set, and is mostly synonymous with the saying about the frog in the well.

https://www.gyosei.jp/service/catalog/hiruma_JHS_2019/HTML/index386.html
One peeps at the heavens through the pith of a reed.

The first reference here had a long description of this idiom.  Had the rather nice-looking translation of 覗く as "peer at the ceiling". Not sure if that is any more [lit] than "look" was though.

look -> peek/peep
Also, since [lit], adding a term for 髄.

peep/peek matches:
針の穴から天覗く
針の穴から天を覗く 
鍵の穴から天を覗く

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">to look at the ceiling through a reed</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">to peek at the ceiling through the pith of a reed</gloss>

koj, daij, gg5

RP

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&biol;</field>

http://www.practical-japanese.com/2011/02/blog-post_781.html

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>a protuberance</gloss>
+<gloss>protuberance</gloss>

英辞郎

Seen on a Lawson’s bag (warning to avoid tears).

Aligning... ?  I hate to discard information, but ...

I think all of the following are roughly the same in meaning:
針の穴から天覗く   <-- This entry
to be like a frog in a well; to make (faulty) assumptions based on one's limited understanding of something;
針の穴から天を覗く 
to have a narrow view of things
鍵の穴から天を覗く
to have a narrow view of things
葦の髄から天井を覗く
to have a narrow view of things 
管を以て天を窺う 
to have a narrow view of things

If any of these expressions was common, I'd probably feel differently.  All of these are pretty my trivia, and their meanings are more-or-less comprehensible from their literal glosses. Compare:

井の中の蛙 - 89167  "synonym"
針の穴から天覗く	93

"to make (faulty) assumptions based one one's limited understanding of something" seems like a literal translation of the daijs definition. daijs also gives similar definitions for all of the other terms above.  Wording varies slightly, but I can't imaging the nuances are actually different.  As an alternative to simplifying this gloss, we could complicate all of the other glosses.

Seemed odd in particular to have the "frog" gloss here, which I don't think is particularly common in everyday English.  (If it were, we wouldn't need a separate gloss on 井の中の蛙, "person who is ignorant of the real world"). 
It is certainly used in Japanese references to define the term, however, perhaps that's where it came from...
https://thesaurus.weblio.jp/content/針の穴から天を覗く

For a [lit] gloss especially, not sure why 覗く would be glossed as "look".  針の穴から天を覗く already uses "peek". aligning this as well. (also "the sky" vs. "the skies").

@@ -17,3 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>to be like a frog in a well</gloss>
-<gloss>to make (faulty) assumptions based on one's limited understanding of something</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="lit">to look at the skies through the eye of a needle</gloss>
+<gloss>to have a narrow view of things</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">to peek at the sky through the eye of a needle</gloss>

typo

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>to make (faulty) assumptions based one one's limited understanding of something</gloss>
+<gloss>to make (faulty) assumptions based on one's limited understanding of something</gloss>

Thanks.

I think time's up.

This has been hanging around for a while. I'll remove it in a few days.

丸ちょぼ	0
まるちょぼ	0

The WWW hits are for things like ear piercing.

native informer

will revisit

gg5

We have 出発時間.

The EJs say things like 効果音を付け加える.

* http://codama.co.jp/foley/foley_info
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foley_(filmmaking)

Saw in the credits of a show. Not in the usual refs, and the above foley studio claims it's not as common in Japanese productions.

koj, nikk
G n-grams: 4479

daijr; readers+

見通しが立つ	3953
見通しが立ちます	224
見通しが立たない	17687
見通しが立たぬ	147
見通しが立たず	2343
GG5: いま失職したら将来の見通しが立たない． If I lose my job now, prospects for the future will be dim.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>(usu. neg) to have (a certain) prospect in sight</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. neg</s_inf>
+<gloss>to have (a certain) prospect in sight</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/見通しが立つ
https://meaning-book.com/blog/20190628104251.html
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=見通しが立

もうすぐ卒業だっていうのに将来の見通しがまるで立ってない

Agreed.
It's not in リーダーズ＋プラス. I think the submitter has misinterpreted the katakana pronunciation (which is a search aid in RP) as a gloss.

0 n-grams. Not in JEs/EJs that I can see. Few WWW hits.

I don't think this is needed.

研究社リーダーズ＋プラスＶ２; https://mixi.jp/view_bbs.pl?comm_id=123524&id=66758405

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/畠山重篤

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&male;</misc>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/津金澤督雄

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/寺尾知可史

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/新見昌央

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/二宮宣文

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/秦光賢

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/平井政遒

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/平川公義

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/深尾立

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/福嶌教偉

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/堀田知光

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/保利眞直

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/村松郁延

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/守屋秀繁