sankoku, obunsha: (俗)
shinmeikai: (口頭)

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="2727020">ダウナー・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2727020">ダウナー・2</xref>
@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>upper (drug)</gloss>
@@ -28 +28,0 @@
-<gloss>upper</gloss>

daijs: 多く複合語の形で用い、上の、上方の、の意を表す。「―スイング」

I don't think the 上層 x-ref is needed. They're not normally interchangeable.

@@ -9,2 +9 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1353710">上層</xref>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -12 +11 @@
-<gloss>higher</gloss>
+<gloss>upward</gloss>
@@ -16,2 +15 @@
-<gloss>shoe upper</gloss>
-<gloss>upper part of a shoe</gloss>
+<gloss>upper (of a shoe)</gloss>

KOD, Daijs, etc.

Seems it's fairly broad.

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1353710">上層</xref>
@@ -10,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>higher</gloss>
@@ -22,0 +25,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="ant" seq="2727020">ダウナー</xref>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>stimulant</gloss>
+<gloss>upper</gloss>
+</sense>

koj, daijr, daijs, nikk

Not sure if the shoe sense is notable enough, but koj, daijs and nikk all have it.

@@ -11,0 +12,11 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>shoe upper</gloss>
+<gloss>upper part of a shoe</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1016590">アッパーカット</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>uppercut</gloss>
+</sense>

Daijr/s and koj don't have that restriction. I don't think it's needed, especially with 円坐 marked as rare.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<stagk>円座</stagk>
@@ -23 +22 @@
-<gloss>sitting in circle</gloss>
+<gloss>sitting in a circle</gloss>

Meikyo, obunsha, iwakoku, and shinmeikai restrict the "straw mat" sense to 円座

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 円座　 │ 91,593 │ 99.0% │
│ 円坐　 │    930 │  1.0% │ - add rK (daijr/s, koj, etc.)
│ えんざ │  3,198 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

Sankoku and shinmeikai list the "straw mat" sense first. [vs] usages seem rare.
╭─ーーーー─┬─────╮
│ 円座し　 │ 141 │
│ 円坐し　 │   0 │
├─ーーーー─┼─────┤
│ 円座する │  21 │
│ 円坐する │   0 │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────╯

@@ -6,0 +7,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>円坐</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +14,5 @@
+<sense>
+<stagk>円座</stagk>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>round straw mat</gloss>
+</sense>
@@ -15 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>round straw mat</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

花壻 could be sK.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 花婿　　 │ 98,468 │ 98.7% │
│ 花聟　　 │    852 │  0.9% │ - add rK (daijr/s, koj, etc.)
│ 花壻　　 │      0 │  0.0% │ - add rK (daijs, koj)
│ はなむこ │    430 │  0.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>花聟</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>花壻</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18 +26 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1194570">花嫁・はなよめ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1194570">花嫁</xref>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1194570">花嫁・はなよめ</xref>

gg5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Seats_of_national_legislatures

I think it's better to list the examples as glosses.

@@ -16 +16,6 @@
-<gloss>national parliament or congress building (e.g. National Diet Building (Japan), United States Capitol (USA), Houses of Parliament (UK), etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>parliament building</gloss>
+<gloss>parliament house</gloss>
+<gloss>National Diet Building (Japan)</gloss>
+<gloss>(US) Capitol</gloss>
+<gloss>Houses of Parliament</gloss>
+<gloss>National Assembly building</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Capitol

Adding reference. "United States Capitol" sounds odd to me, but I guess it's what's used.

Capitol Hill is a neighborhood (and an actual hill) in Washington, D. C. at the summit of which sits the United States Capitol. Much in the same way that the US media will refer to executive branch of the US Government simply as "the Whitehouse," often the legislative branch is colloquially referred to as "Capitol Hill" since the collective offices of the various members of the House and Senate as well as the Capitol itself are located there.

@@ -16,1 +16,1 @@
-<gloss>national parliament or congress building (e.g. National Diet (Japan), Capitol Hill (US), Houses of Parliament (UK), etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>national parliament or congress building (e.g. National Diet Building (Japan), United States Capitol (USA), Houses of Parliament (UK), etc.)</gloss>

@@ -39,0 +40 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1620400">中・6</xref>

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>on top of</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>on top of</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

Several of these senses only exist as kanwa meanings. I don't think they're needed here.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
@@ -15,3 +15,6 @@
-<gloss>as a matter of (e.g. fact)</gloss>
-<gloss>in the field of</gloss>
-<gloss>being of the type of</gloss>
+<gloss>from the viewpoint of</gloss>
+<gloss>with respect to</gloss>
+<gloss>in terms of</gloss>
+<gloss>as a matter of</gloss>
+<gloss>in view of</gloss>
+<gloss>so far as ... is concerned</gloss>
@@ -20,2 +23 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>aboard (a ship or vehicle)</gloss>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>aboard (a ship or vehicle)</gloss>
@@ -28,3 +31,5 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2080200">下・げ・2</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1352840">上巻</xref>
-<gloss>first volume (e.g. book)</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>the best</gloss>
+<gloss>top</gloss>
+<gloss>first class</gloss>
+<gloss>first grade</gloss>
@@ -34,5 +39,3 @@
-<pos>&pref;</pos>
-<gloss>superior quality</gloss>
-<gloss>best</gloss>
-<gloss>top</gloss>
-<gloss>high class</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2080200">下・2</xref>
+<gloss>first volume (of a two or three-volume set)</gloss>
+<gloss>first book</gloss>
@@ -41,21 +44,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&pref;</pos>
-<gloss>going up</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&pref;</pos>
-<gloss>governmental</gloss>
-<gloss>imperial</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&pref;</pos>
-<gloss>presenting</gloss>
-<gloss>showing</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&pref;</pos>
-<field>&med;</field>
-<field>&biol;</field>
-<gloss>ana-</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<s_inf>written on a gift's wrapping paper</s_inf>
+<gloss>with my compliments</gloss>

@@ -59 +59,3 @@
-<gloss>ana- (medical, biol.)</gloss>
+<field>&med;</field>
+<field>&biol;</field>
+<gloss>ana-</gloss>

Oxford tags lade/lading as "archaic".

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>lading</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

I disagree. Just like last month.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>fully nude</gloss>
+<gloss>nude</gloss>

The term fully nude is more appropriate for 全裸 since that is more commonly used in English. Just adding this to make it easier to find in English.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>nude</gloss>
+<gloss>fully nude</gloss>

English N-gram Counts
completely naked 86777
stark naked      39855
fully nude       28413
fully naked      12973

Also, the anonymous commenter's assertion is false.

The "fully" is redundant. You can't be half nude.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>fully nude</gloss>
+<gloss>nude</gloss>

The term "fully nude" and "fully naked" are more commonly used than the other 2 definitions and is more accurate. It should be included as such.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>nude</gloss>
+<gloss>fully nude</gloss>

Adding the word "fully" to make this word easier to find since the term "fully nude" or "fully naked" are commonly used and more in line with the definition of the word.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>nude</gloss>
+<gloss>fully nude</gloss>

I disagree. Just like last month.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>fully nude</gloss>
+<gloss>nude</gloss>

The term fully nude is more appropriate for 全裸 since that is more commonly used in English. Just adding this to make it easier to find in English.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>nude</gloss>
+<gloss>fully nude</gloss>

English N-gram Counts
completely naked 86777
stark naked      39855
fully nude       28413
fully naked      12973

Also, the anonymous commenter's assertion is false.

"fully nude" is a more appropriate definition than just "nude". Especially if "completely naked" is included.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>nude</gloss>
+<gloss>fully nude</gloss>

I disagree. Just like last month.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>fully nude</gloss>
+<gloss>nude</gloss>

The term fully nude is more appropriate for 全裸 since that is more commonly used in English. Just adding this to make it easier to find in English.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>nude</gloss>
+<gloss>fully nude</gloss>

English N-gram Counts
completely naked 86777
stark naked      39855
fully nude       28413
fully naked      12973

Also, the anonymous commenter's assertion is false.

I think that gloss should lead.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>great success</gloss>
@@ -15 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>great success</gloss>

GG5

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/en/大成功/#clj-1221002
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=大成功

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>great success</gloss>

G n-grams 797654

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Kokugos all mention 絶えそう or 死にそう.
They also say it can refer to the 状態 or to the 呼吸 itself.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>faint breath</gloss>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>dying breath</gloss>
@@ -15 +16 @@
-<gloss>at death's door</gloss>
+<gloss>being at death's door</gloss>

gg5, prog, luminous
痛恨	213,843		
痛恨の	183,290	
痛恨な	630		
痛恨し	526		
痛恨する	104

Oddly, only the smaller kokugos have this as vs (and only meikyo has it as adj-na). Given the very low n-gram counts for this usage, I think the tags are best dropped.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -16,10 +17,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<gloss>regretful</gloss>
-<gloss>sorrowful</gloss>
-<gloss>bitter</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>contrition</gloss>
+<gloss>deep regret</gloss>
+<gloss>great sorrow</gloss>
+<gloss>bitter grief</gloss>

[vt]: shinmeikai, meikyo, etc.

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Your contrition is noted  8-)
Rest assured, there'll be no attrition.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 下張り　 │ 5,518 │ 55.4% │
│ 下張　　 │ 2,694 │ 27.1% │ - add (daijr)
│ 下貼り　 │ 1,276 │ 12.8% │ - add (daijs, koj, meikyo)
│ 下貼　　 │   106 │  1.1% │ - sK
│ したばり │   364 │  3.7% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,6 @@
+<keb>下張</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>下貼り</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Bulk update of vs-vi-vt tags from meikyo
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

類を見ない	243,598
類まれ	        48,625		
類のない	        32,275

At least three forms we'd need to list. I don't think a note is helpful here. The x-refs are probably sufficient.

@@ -31 +30,0 @@
-<s_inf>often 類い(の)ない, etc.</s_inf>

GG5, 中辞典

I think this is better than "in negative".

@@ -31 +31 @@
-<s_inf>usu. in negative</s_inf>
+<s_inf>often 類い(の)ない, etc.</s_inf>

Just added this note to 比類. Helpful to make the motivation for the xrefs explicit.

@@ -30,0 +31 @@
+<s_inf>usu. in negative</s_inf>

I agree with Stephen.

Lots of questions about this on chiebukuro as well.
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q12189583437
Apparently たぐ.い was added to the 常用 list in 2010. Before that, 類 only had one reading on the list (音: るい).

This chiebukoro user saw 類い written in a recently-published novel written by a famous author. Then after using 類い at work, they were told by a work colleague that 類い is incorrect because it's written as 類 in kojien.

The impression that I get is that 類 is the most commonly used form, but the government is trying to promote 類い in official writing due to the ambiguity with るい. It seems this style hasn't yet entirely caught on, however.

Aligning.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1000730">行けない・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1000730">行けない・4</xref>
@@ -29 +29 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1000730">行けない・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1000730">行けない・2</xref>

Not sure it's needed.

@@ -35 +35 @@
-<gloss>cannot go</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">cannot go</gloss>

Literal sense

@@ -32,0 +33,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>cannot go</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>

@@ -47 +47,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1423670">中巻</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1352170">上・4</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2080200">下・2</xref>

Done.

OK.

gg5, prog, wisdom, luminous, daij

I felt that the suffix senses should be higher up.
I'll reindex the sentences if this is approved.

@@ -14,4 +14,2 @@
-<pos>&pref;</pos>
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
-<gloss>medium</gloss>
-<gloss>average</gloss>
+<gloss>medium (size)</gloss>
+<gloss>average (grade, level, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +19,22 @@
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<gloss>in</gloss>
+<gloss>within</gloss>
+<gloss>out of (e.g. ten people)</gloss>
+<gloss>among</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<gloss>during</gloss>
+<gloss>while</gloss>
+<gloss>in (the course of)</gloss>
+<gloss>within (a period)</gloss>
+<gloss>throughout</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<gloss>currently (doing)</gloss>
+<gloss>in the process of</gloss>
+<gloss>in the middle of</gloss>
+<gloss>under (e.g. construction, investigation)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -21,0 +42 @@
+<gloss>middle way</gloss>
@@ -26 +47,5 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2128530">中一</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1423670">中巻</xref>
+<gloss>second volume (of three)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -28,0 +54 @@
+<gloss>junior high school</gloss>
@@ -36,20 +61,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1423670">中巻</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>volume two (of three)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1600920">話し中・1</xref>
-<gloss>during (a certain time when one did or is doing something)</gloss>
-<gloss>under (construction, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>while</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2083570">中・じゅう・2</xref>
-<gloss>in</gloss>
-<gloss>out of</gloss>
-<gloss>of the</gloss>

i think this is basically the same as the sense we already have but that the example distracts from it.

@@ -54,6 +54,2 @@
-<gloss>out of (e.g. three out of ten people)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>(as N+中の+N) most N of the N</gloss>
-<gloss>N among N's</gloss>
+<gloss>out of</gloss>
+<gloss>of the</gloss>

gg5, daij
軽重	33,968		
軽重し	0		
軽重する	49

All the kokugos (inluding meikyo, sankoku, etc.) point from けいじゅう to けいちょう. YouGlish examples also suggest that けいちょう is the more common reading.
vs only applies to an archaic sense.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<reb>けいじゅう</reb>
+<reb>けいちょう</reb>
@@ -15 +15 @@
-<reb>けいちょう</reb>
+<reb>けいじゅう</reb>
@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>relative weight</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>(relative) weight</gloss>
@@ -24,2 +24 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>relative importance</gloss>
+<gloss>(relative) importance</gloss>

gg5, daijs

Not necessarily a crime.
Splitting.

@@ -18,0 +19,5 @@
+<gloss>relative weight</gloss>
+<gloss>lightness and heaviness</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>relative weight</gloss>
@@ -22 +26 @@
-<gloss>gravity (of a crime)</gloss>
+<gloss>gravity</gloss>

eij

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>gravity (of a crime)</gloss>

gg5, daij
研ぎ師	9,414		
研師	3,297

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>研師</keb>
@@ -12 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>sharpener (of swords) and polisher (of mirrors)</gloss>
+<gloss>knife grinder (person)</gloss>
+<gloss>sword sharpener</gloss>
+<gloss>polisher (of mirrors, swords, etc.)</gloss>

gg5, reverso

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>(maximum) load</gloss>
+<gloss>load capacity</gloss>
@@ -12,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>carrying capacity</gloss>

Koj also has 連台 for the palanquin sense.
連台	796

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>連台</keb>

Adding second sense that can be found in most kokugos. All of them say 「江戸時代」

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 蓮台　　 │ 11,248 │ 95.7% │
│ 輦台　　 │    507 │  4.3% │ - add (second sense only)
│ れんだい │ 11,089 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>輦台</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +14 @@
+<stagk>蓮台</stagk>
@@ -13,0 +18,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>river palanquin</gloss>
+<gloss>river litter (vehicle)</gloss>
+</sense>

GG5 has that, but I agree with the change.

Hyphen not necessary and makes it harder to search for.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>nurse-teacher</gloss>
+<gloss>nurse teacher</gloss>

GG5, 新和英中辞典, ルミナス和英辞典

@@ -16,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>school nurse</gloss>
+<gloss>nurse-teacher</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/養護教�
%AD

@@ -16,1 +16,1 @@
-<gloss>teacher for the handicapped</gloss>
+<gloss>health teacher</gloss>

As pointed out below, "sexual assault" is too broad. I don't think we need a second gloss.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>criminal sexual assault</gloss>

I added "criminal assault" 7 years ago largely because it is in the JEs. As I said at the time it's a euphemistic term. Since Brian rightly points out it can be somewhat misleading, I suggest adding the more literal equivalent.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>criminal sexual assault</gloss>

https://twitter.com/BleacherReport/status/1595494370459160577
Seven Michigan State players have been charged with criminal assault in connection with a tunnel brawl with Michigan players on October 29.

Or, search the news for "charged with criminal assault"

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/prince-georges-county/13-prince-georges-officers-charged-in-alleged-double-dipping-scheme/3142102/
Investigators were led to Finn shortly after an investigation into former county police corporal Darryl Wormuth. Wormuth was charged with criminal assault after allegedly grabbing a handcuffed 17-year-old boy by the throat. 

Obviously the term is also used for sexual assaults.

THE THIRD REPORT OF JAPAN
UNDER ARTICLE 44, PARAGRAPH 1
OF THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHT OF THE CHILD 
https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/human/child/report_a44.pdf
vs. 
https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/jido/pdfs/0804_kj03.pdf
"rape" is the translation throughout, ex:
１４１． なお、確かに、刑法１７７条（強姦罪）
141. While it is true that the offenses under Article 177 (rape)

I wonder if there is an issue here that we didn't used to charge men with criminal assault over brawling as much as we do today, and that "criminal assault" has lost an older implied connotation.

...

Came here to "correct" what I thought was an oversight, and saw that this was discussed and decided on deliberately.  If you see this term on jisho.org, it looks like:
(crime of) rape; criminal assault​ Law ("Law" in gray).

While the goal of "people will infer sexual connotations from the first term" is understandable, [law] appears affixed to the second term.  It's possible to read this as "colloquially used for [rape], but as a legal matter this is the general term for any criminal assault".

If you search "criminal assault" in jmdict, this is currently the *only* matching entry, which also increases the chance of misunderstanding. 

I don't agree that "criminal assault" is limited to an understood euphemistic reference for rape. If you'd asked me out of the blue, "what is criminal assault", I would have said "someone attacks/injures another in a fight and got arrested/charged."  "rape" would not have entered my mind.  If you say "the woman was criminally assaulted by the male perpetrator", inferences would obviously be made.  But "charged with criminal assault" is also what you'll get if one man punches another in a bar fight.

I was going to just insert "sexual" in the middle of "criminal assault", but I think Tom's point from 2016 was well made.  From a legal perspective "rape" in English (as far as I can see) requires penetration, as does the legal term 強姦罪.  "Sexual assault" does not.  I don't see the value of downgrading the term as a gloss. (people can do that on their own if they want)

And given that 強姦罪 *requires* penetration, "criminal assault" seems like a massive understatement.  I don't know what the other J-E dictionary motivations was here.  If eijiro and ルミナス exclusively glossed this as "criminal assault", that seems way off, and it's hard to imagine a reason other than not wanting to include sensitive English vocabulary in their dictionary. 

For comparison, the jmdictdb entries for レイプ and 強姦 are already glossed:
レイプ  rape; sexual assault​
強姦 rape; sexual assault​

In this case, as a matter of [law], this would appear to need to be

*** criminal sexual assault (including penetration)

I'm not advocating for or against such a gloss. That's a matter of everyone's sensibilities.

The value of including "criminal assault" (especially when we don't even have entry in jmdictdb for the actual legal equivalent), seems to me to be outweighed by the more serious issues attached to this term.  Translating 強姦罪 as "criminal assault" loses a whole lot of information, and blindly translating "criminal assault" as 強姦罪 could represent a massive error in modern use.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>criminal assault</gloss>

ルミナス: criminal assault
中辞典: rape; criminal assault
GG5: rape; criminal [sexual] assault
Eijiro: criminal assault

AFAIK "criminal assault" is a rather euphemistic English term for rape. Obviously compilers of JE dictionaries rather like it. It probably should be added, at least for reverse searches. Having it preceded by "rape" should make the context clear.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>criminal assault</gloss>

http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?
re=02&vm=04&id=1960#ja_pt2ch23at4

According to the Japanese penal code, "sexual intercourse" has to 
occur for the crime of 強姦罪 to apply, so I think the broader "sexual 
assault" gloss is unneeded/incorrect.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>sexual assault</gloss>

gg5

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>carrying (loading) capacity (power)</gloss>
+<gloss>load capacity</gloss>
+<gloss>loading capacity</gloss>
+<gloss>carrying capacity</gloss>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1620400">中・5</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1620400">中・6</xref>

@@ -17,2 +17,2 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1352170">上・じょう・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1184670">下巻</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1352170">上・4</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1620400">中・5</xref>

I think it's OK.

maybe the x-ref to 上 can be removed as the 下巻 entries are well x-ref'd already

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1184670">下巻</xref>

I don't think the x-ref is appropriate. This is a proverb and 藁にもすがる is an idiom. They don't even use the same verb.

@@ -33 +32,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2779480">藁にもすがる・わらにもすがる</xref>

藁をも掴む	8781	35.2%
藁をもつかむ	7388	29.6%
わらをもつかむ	4643	18.6%
ワラをもつかむ	2438	9.8%
ワラをも掴む	1702	6.8%

溺れる者は	6132	84.9%
おぼれる者は	1089	15.1%

also, vs more common
藁にもすがる	20495	  
藁にも縋る	2287	

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/a_drowning_man_will_clutch_at_a_straw#:~:text=A person in desperate need,even if it is insignificant.

https://www.plansponsor.com/tuesday-trivia-phrase-grasping-straws-come/?layout=print#:~:text=It comes from a proverb,the side of a river.
It comes from a proverb in Thomas More’s “Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation” (1534) which says, “A drowning man will clutch at straws.” It is said that the “straw” in this case refers to the sort of thin reeds that grow by the side of a river.

It was odd to see such a long-form idiom with kanji ranked at the bottom.  Full kanji form is prevalent on twitter, supported by n-grams. 

Seems like a bit of a fools errand to catalogue all combinations of 
溺れ・おぼれ　
もの・者　
藁・わら・ワラ　
掴む・つかむ
(24 combinations, all probably in use somewhere）. Likewise, I don't know about displaying any particular alternate surface form. *In particular*, for learners をも掴む would suffer by being written in kana, since をも is so unusual, and the "verb" would probably be guessed as もつかむ. (I had this problem myself, even with the kanji... I tried to figure out why もつかむ wasn't in the dictionary anywhere).  I added some [sK] forms that are more popular than the ones here, and I mostly just pulled them out of a hat. There are surely even more.

Japanese also has the old form(をも掴む) /modern-form (にも縋る) dichotomy, so I felt ok replacing the English gloss with what appears to be the most common structure. (clutch).

I didn't associate the English gloss with "grasping at straws", I had no idea this was an English idiom, or that it was the source of "grasping at straws".  
I thought this was a piece of ancient East-Asian wisdom.  Couldn't find a Japanese etymology, I think it's suspected to be a calque from English, but unknown.

In place of a [lit] gloss, I think the xref helps clears up a lot.

@@ -5 +5,5 @@
-<keb>おぼれる者はわらをもつかむ</keb>
+<keb>溺れる者は藁をも掴む</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>溺れる者は藁をもつかむ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11 +16,10 @@
-<keb>溺れる者は藁をも掴む</keb>
+<keb>おぼれる者はわらをもつかむ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>溺れる者はワラをも掴む</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>溺れる者はワラをもつかむ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +33 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2779480">藁にもすがる・わらにもすがる</xref>
@@ -20 +35 @@
-<gloss>a drowning man will catch at a straw</gloss>
+<gloss>a drowning man will clutch at a straw</gloss>

Add POS to proverbs
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>A drowning man will catch at a straw</gloss>
+<gloss>a drowning man will catch at a straw</gloss>

gg5, prog

We wouldn't normally gloss an adj-i entry as a verb but I think it makes sense to do so here. This isn't adjectival; it always takes を.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1912640">物ともせず</xref>
@@ -15,2 +14,7 @@
-<gloss>ignoring</gloss>
-<gloss>acting as if it is nothing</gloss>
+<s_inf>as ...をものともしない</s_inf>
+<gloss>to think nothing of ...</gloss>
+<gloss>to care nothing for ...</gloss>
+<gloss>to be undaunted by ...</gloss>
+<gloss>to defy ...</gloss>
+<gloss>to brave ...</gloss>
+<gloss>to pay no attention to ...</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬────────╮
│ ものともしない　　 │ 22,394 │
│ ものともしなかった │  1,160 │
│ ものともしなく　　 │    186 │
├─ーーーーーーーーー─┼────────┤
│ 物ともしない　　　 │  4,317 │
│ 物ともしなかった　 │    142 │
│ 物ともしなく　　　 │     48 │
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴────────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>

Entry created

エッチディーディー	0	0.0%
エイチディーディー	54	100.0%

New style

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>エッチディーディー</reb>
+<reb>エイチ・ディー・ディー</reb>
@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エッチディーディー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Entry created

GG5: He that toucheth pitch shall be defiled．

I guess this can be closed. Seems OK.

https://www.bible.com/bible/compare/PRO.13.20

Proverbs 13:20 New Century Version (NCV)
Spend time with the wise and you will become wise, but the friends of fools will suffer.

https://yoji-jukugo.com/近朱必赤/#:~:text=人は交わる相手によって,必ず赤くなる」という意味。

http://www.nishikie.com/stories/TNS-1054-6_confessions_of_evil.html
Proverb (allegory) is modified by 朱(しゆ)に交(まぢ)ハれバ赤(あか)くなる (shiyu ni madjihareba akaku naru) -- which today would be written 朱に交われば赤くなる (Shu ni majiwareba akaku naru) -- meaning "when mixing (mingling, associating) with vermilion, one becomes red" -- in other words, one is inspired to be good or evil according to the friends or company one keeps.

The Japanese proverb reflects part of the the Chinese expression 近朱者赤、近墨者黒 (jìn zhū zhĕ chì, jìn mò zhĕ hēi) -- meaning "those tho get close to cinnabar [China] ink become red, [while] those who get close to soot [India] ink become black" -- attributed to the poet Fu Hsuan (傅玄, Fu Xuan, 217-278) -- among other expressions, like 近墨必緇、近朱必赤.

One reason I started looking at this was because of the dated nature of the gloss.  I wasn't familiar with it (doesn't mean it's bad or wrong, of course), so it didn't seem to clarify the meaning for me.  I actually internalized the "bad" reading from the outset, assuming that red=bad (as in 朱を入れる - to make a correction). 

Googling around I see this is a bible verse.  I ran into the "New Century Version" translation, and it seems a bit more accessible. (linked reference has various translations)

"Spend time with the wise and you will become wise, but the friends of fools will suffer."

What do you think? I don't know that any of the various formulations are extremely commonly known, so modern grammar seems preferable to me.  For what it's worth, I told a 50 year old friend about the "lay down with dogs" idiom, which is apparently also biblical, and he wasn't familiar with it.

I search backwards for the longer Chinese expression referencing both vermillion and soot (black), and found what I think is a better literal gloss.  

Also, "influenced by one's environment" is maybe not as specific as it could be (being overshadowed by a lot of talented people might impact someone negatively, for example, but that would be contrary to this idiom).

@@ -14,3 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>you are the company you keep</gloss>
-<gloss>if you lie down with dogs, you will get up with fleas</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="lit">if you mingle with vermillion, you will turn red</gloss>
+<gloss>people will take on the characteristics of those who surround them</gloss>
+<gloss>spend time with the wise and you will become wise, but the friends of fools will suffer</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">when mixing with vermillion, one becomes red</gloss>

If classes are divivided up by current academic performance, then what will happen to students after that...
https://twitter.com/Tontantan3/status/1630420102678978561
しかし成績によるクラス分けがその後「朱に交われば赤くなる」的に大きく影響すると言われればそれは確かにそうだろうとは思うし、

About changing your surroundings to improve
https://twitter.com/minagawashi/status/1628500627017064449
「朱に交われば赤くなる」。あなたはきっと良い方向へ変わっていける！

That's a good catch... I think I was influenced by some of the older glosses that float around, like "he who touches pitch shall be defiled therewith" and "one rotten apple spoils the barrel", and happened to stumble into a Japanese writeup that confirmed what I expected to hear.

"you are the company you keep" is, I think, usually used judgmentally, and about the quality of one's character (not financial or academic success, etc., or professional sports performance, as I saw in one post). 

朱に交われば赤くなる seems to be a lot more, general in observing that people will be influenced by the environment they are placed it. (there may also be a judgemental after-the-fast usage, but it's certainly not the only usage).

"with wolves", like the older, dropped "pitch" gloss, seems far too negative for how this is used in practice... I might suggest just reverting to where things were, not sure I have anything to add from that. Will think about it

Looking at examples on Twitter, I don't think ふつう、悪い意味の時に使う。 is true.

Important warning given on https://proverb-encyclopedia.com/syunimaziwarreba/
ふつう、悪い意味の時に使う。
「うちの子は進学塾に通うようになったら、朱に交われば赤くなるで、熱心に勉強して成績が上がるようになったの。」
と使うのは誤り。

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/if_you_lie_down_with_dogs,_you_get_up_with_fleas#:~:text=Proverb,-if you lie&text=Spending time with undesirable people,take on their undesirable traits.

"Spending time with undesirable people will cause one to take on their undesirable traits."

Some different gloss suggestions...

You could drop the dogs/flees gloss and just leave "you are the company you keep". I think it's basically a perfect match. (Especially if you want to preserve the theoretical ambiguity that it could be used in a positive sense).

In reply to Marcus's comments from 2020, I suspect the 国語辞典 has been lazy with discussing the nuance. 
As with this English saying, in theory it means "if you spend time with bad people, you'll get bad habits, if you spend time with good people, you'll get good habits".

But it's only really used as a cautionary admonition towards people who are doing bad things. (See reference note, ふつう、悪い意味の時に使う. Also, all example sentences in reference are negative）

We rarely say "you are the company the company you keep" of people who spend all their time working with charities and volunteer groups.

==== Note for curious === 
Apparently from a longer Chinese saying, same meaning -  that mixed with black ink turns black, that mixed with vermillion turns red.  What I read wasn't apparent about whether red and black were inherently good or bad - more just the notion that your surroundings rub off on you.

@@ -14,2 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>people are formed by their surroundings</gloss>
-<gloss>walk with the wise and become wise; associate with fools and get in trouble</gloss>
+<gloss>you are the company you keep</gloss>
+<gloss>if you lie down with dogs, you will get up with fleas</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">if you mingle with vermillion, you will turn red</gloss>

sankoku: 対象を、ある年齢以上に制限すること。
ゾーニング	34,008
ゾーニングし	1,240

vs in sankoku.

@@ -8,0 +9,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -13 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>rating products, films, etc. (e.g. for adult content)</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>aged-based restriction (on products, services, etc.)</gloss>

Not easy to gloss.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>zoning</gloss>
+<gloss>zoning (e.g. in urban planning)</gloss>
@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>restricting purchase or viewership (based on age, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>rating products, films, etc. (e.g. for adult content)</gloss>

daijs
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ゾーニング

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>restricting purchase or viewership (based on age, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ くず肉　 │ 5,142 │ 46.1% │
│ クズ肉　 │ 4,399 │ 39.4% │ - add
│ 屑肉　　 │ 1,582 │ 14.2% │
│ くずにく │    30 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>クズ肉</keb>

Entry created

I think this is better.

@@ -22 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>mnemonic for remembering the months with fewer than 31 days (ni, shi, mu, ku, etc.)</gloss>
+<s_inf>士 represents November as it can be decomposed into 十一 (11)</s_inf>
+<gloss>nishimuku samurai (mnemonic for remembering the months with fewer than 31 days)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 二四六九士　　　 │   120 │  1.8% │ - (daijr, koj)
│ 西向く侍　　　　 │ 4,054 │ 60.6% │ - (daijr, nikk)
│ 西向く士　　　　 │   306 │  4.6% │ - (daijs)
│ 西向くさむらい　 │    63 │  0.9% │ - sK
│ にしむくさむらい │ 2,148 │ 32.1% │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

OK

クソ映画	7,303
クソ親父	5,647
クソ田舎	5,629
クソ会社	5,524

I don't think it needs to be searchable. This sense of くそ is very common, and 糞ゲーム is relatively uncommon. The meaning is obvious.

糞ゲーム	1841
くそゲーム	225
クソゲーム	1257

I saw the comments there. I'd be happy to make it sK/sk within the 糞ゲー entry as I think it still should be searchable. It's probably better just to keep it here.
I'll align the glosses.

@@ -17,2 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>shit video game</gloss>
-<gloss>embarrassingly bad video game</gloss>
+<gloss>terrible (video) game</gloss>
+<gloss>crappy game</gloss>
+<gloss>rubbish game</gloss>

See comments on 2691240.

迷い星	567

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

daij, koj

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1562600">惑星</xref>

日本語WordNet(英和), daijs, daijr

I'd argue it's a common/obvious sense of 負う but I won't fight it.
I think the x-ref is unnecessary.
I don't think 深傷を負う should be sK. 深傷 isn't sK.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,2 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1497930">負う・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1497930">負う・3</xref>

GG5, 中辞典 (both have this as examples in the 深手 entry)

I'd be happy to drop it if the receive/incur/etc. sense of 負う was the main one. It's not; we have it as #3 and some JEs have it as #5. It's obviously a standard phrase and while rhe meaning might be obvious, it's not something I'd construct from scratch. I think it's useful to show that it's used this way.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────╮
│ 深手　　　 │ 18,009 │
│ 深手を負う │  1,512 │
│ 深手を負っ │  6,760 │
│ 深手を負わ │  1,581 │
│ 深手を負い │  2,398 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────╯

For what it's worth, 12,251 / 18,009 = roughly 70% of the usages of 深手 seem to be in this expression.
Many of the remaining usages are slight variations (e.g. 深手の傷を負う)

I still think should be deleted (see my comment from 2019). I don't think it should be kept just because it's harmless.

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<gloss>to purr (cat)</gloss>
+<gloss>to purr (of a cat)</gloss>

See deleted 2829468.

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>喉鳴らす</keb>

〈咽喉／喉／のど〉を〈鳴ら／なら〉し

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 喉を鳴らし　 │ 21,891 │ 68.7% │
│ のどを鳴らし │  4,755 │ 14.9% │
│ 喉をならし　 │  3,478 │ 10.9% │
│ 咽喉を鳴らし │    606 │  1.9% │ - add sK (jitsuyou)
│ 咽喉をならし │     26 │  0.1% │
│ のどをならし │  1,095 │  3.4% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>咽喉を鳴らす</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>purring (cat)</gloss>
+<gloss>purring (of a cat)</gloss>

jwiki(喉鳴らし)
ngrams
  喉鳴らし	1551
  のど鳴らし	546
  喉ならし	527
  のどならし	141

Interesting. I see 喉鳴らし, etc. are more common. I'll add 喉鳴らす as sK in the 喉を鳴らす entry and drop this one.

喉鳴らす	        297		
喉を鳴らす	7,093

I don't think this is needed. It's just 喉を鳴らす without the を, but much less common.

G n-grams: 297, plenty of WWW hits about cats purring.

New style.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>アイ・オー・ティー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -12,3 +16 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>アイ・オー・ティー</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -17,0 +20 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

daijs

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1593170">転ける・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1593170">こける・2</xref>

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1593170">転ける・こける・2</xref>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1593170">転ける・2</xref>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙 (has おおコケ)

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>だいコケ</reb>
+<reb>おおコケ</reb>
@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1593170">転ける・こける・2</xref>

http://thesaurus.weblio.jp/content/大コケする

I couldn't find a better reference than the one above but there are plenty of examples online.
Usually used to describe movies that perform badly at the box office.

chujiten: 街は強風にあおられて火の海と化した.　 A strong wind was blowing and the neighborhood turned into a sea of flames.
luminous: 1 階は火の海だった The 「first [《英》 ground] floor was 「a sea of flames [in flames].
prog: 部屋の中は火の海だった The room was 「in flames [a sea of flame/ablaze].
      繁華街は火の海と化した  The shopping district turned into a blazing inferno.

I think it's clear enough that "sea of fire" isn't literal, especially with the id tag.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>area engulfed in flames</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>sea of flames</gloss>
+<gloss>blazing inferno</gloss>

sankoku:
火事で、いちめんに火がもえ広がった状態。「あたりは━だ・空襲で東京が━になる」

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>area engulfed in flames</gloss>
@@ -14 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>sea of flame</gloss>

Forgot to mention: 鯨【いさな】 is in daijr/s, koj, meikyo, and obunsha.

Meikyo and obunsha lead with 勇魚. Shinmeikai only has 勇魚.

I only see 鯨魚 in daijr.

Koj and daijr only apply いさ to 鯨

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>鯨魚</keb>
+<keb>勇魚</keb>
@@ -8 +8,4 @@
-<keb>勇魚</keb>
+<keb>鯨</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鯨魚</keb>
@@ -14,0 +18 @@
+<re_restr>鯨</re_restr>

daij
saw here:
https://art-tags.net/manyo/animal/kujira.html (万葉集)
daijr has 鯨, daijs doesn't.

KOD, ルミナス, Eijiro

It really has only one meaning in a medical context. We don't usually attempt to explain such glosses.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2857574">血清総蛋白・けつえきそうたんぱく</xref>
@@ -17 +16 @@
-<gloss>total protein(blood work measurement)</gloss>
+<gloss>total protein</gloss>

A complete protein or whole protein is a food source of protein that contains an adequate proportion of each of the nine essential amino acids necessary in the human diet.[1][2][3][4][5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_protein

総蛋白（T-P）
https://www.central-cl.or.jp/result/総蛋白（t-
p%EF%BC%89/#:~:text=%E7%B7%8F%E8%9B%8B%E7%99%BD%E3%81%A8%E3%81%AF%E3%81%9D%E3%81%AE,%E3%81%BF%E3%82%8B%E3%81%93%E3%81%A8%E3%81%8C%E3%81%A7%E3%81%8D%E3%81%BE%E3%81%99%E3%80%82

総蛋白＝アルブミン＋グロブリン　
https://jaclap.org/guests/examination_no421/

Total Protein (TP)
https://www.vetnursing.ie/total-protein
A total protein (TP) assay is a measurement of the proteins found in plasma (the liquid portion of the blood). The majority of plasma proteins are produced by the liver (Sirois, 2015).

It may have been adequate to just remove "whole protein".  Just noticed this was added from a blood test in 2021, "whole protein" probably should just not have been here.

If you google "whole protein" (quoted) and "総蛋白", you get dictionary results.  If "total protein", a landslide of results.

"Complete protein" also falls inside of [med], so this doesn't help disambiguate that term.

I *thought* this was a reference to "complete protein", based on the "whole protein" gloss. Japan actually barely has a word for this... 完全なタンパク質 works if necessary, or タンパク質の完全なソース, but it doesn't have a wikipedia page or show up in any advertising copy like "complete protein" (a protein which provides all amino acids needed by humans) would be.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2857574">血清総蛋白・けつえきそうたんぱく</xref>
@@ -16,2 +17 @@
-<gloss>total protein</gloss>
-<gloss>whole protein</gloss>
+<gloss>total protein(blood work measurement)</gloss>

総蛋白	3590
総タンパク	1271
総たんぱく	238

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>総タンパク</keb>

jst https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/総蛋白

Saw it in my blood test results.

Aligning with 月足.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>yearly candlestick chart</gloss>
+<field>&finc;</field>
+<gloss>yearly candlestick</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/年足-595806

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>いっぱきょうしょえんぜつ</reb>
+<reb>いっぱんきょうしょえんぜつ</reb>

GG5.

OK

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>教書演説</keb>
+<keb>一般教書演説</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>きょうしょえんぜつ</reb>
+<reb>いっぱきょうしょえんぜつ</reb>
@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>speech by a leader</gloss>
-<gloss>presidential address</gloss>
+<gloss>State of the Union address (US)</gloss>

教書演説	        14,155		
一般教書演説	12,490
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/一般教書演説

I don't think this is needed. We could change it to 一般教書演説, which is in GG5.

Depends on the context. Let's close it.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>presidential speech</gloss>
+<gloss>speech by a leader</gloss>
+<gloss>presidential address</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/gs/?q=教書演説
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/pickup/6454681

教書演説	14155
Might not be exclusive to presidents.

obvious typo

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>

We don't need an x-ref to a proverb.
Brian, please remember to use the desired surface form (not just the sequence number) when creating x-refs. Readings are not needed in x-refs like this.

@@ -20,2 +20 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2779480">藁にもすがる・わらにもすがる</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2102600">溺れる者は藁をも掴む・おぼれるものはわらをもつかむ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2779480">藁にもすがる</xref>

Using 思い to show that this isn't merely the suffix of the full idiom.

藁にもすがる思い	13604	43.8%
藁にも縋る思い	1582	5.1%
わらにもすがる思い	5931	19.1%
ワラにも縋る思い	90	0.3%

藁をも掴む思い	3726	12.0%
藁をもつかむ思い	3484	11.2%
わらをもつかむ思い	1763	5.7%
ワラをもつかむ思い	871	2.8%

Clone of 藁にもすがる
Mirrors the original dated grammar/vocab, maybe 50% as common as the modern equivalent (にも縋る)(very common).  Could also clone 藁にも縋る思いで, which has its own entry

I guess it may as well go in.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>not counting</gloss>

must be a variant of ノーカウント ?

I do see plenty of examples with this meaning but I'm not sure it's worth having as an entry.

カウント無し	4141	21.6%
カウントなし	15015	78.4%

WWW hits and some of those tweets seem to show it is often used in video games, although many are for 重複カウントなし or エンカウントなし. Perhaps its use at work was drawing on that. I suspect this needs broadening somewhat with some more investigation. Literally it's just "without count(ing)".

https://twitter.com/search?q=カウント無し&src=typed_query

Saw someone use it at work today.

Those Google counts are essentially meaningless.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>school infirmary teacher</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>school infirmary teacher</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/養護教諭
保健室の先生（ほけんしつのせんせい）などと通称されることが多い。 

google web hits:
"養護教諭": About 3,900,000 results
"保健室の先生": About 3,050,000 results

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 養護教諭　　 │ 112,052 │ 82.6% │ - daijr/s, koj, smk, gg5
│ 保健室の先生 │  23,608 │ 17.4% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

Seems very common at least, but maybe not enough to make an exception for

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

This is more commonly used than 養護教諭 so it makes sense to add it as a definition.

多元宇宙	        6,556

@@ -8,0 +9,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2859912">多元宇宙</xref>
+<field>&physics;</field>

マルチバース	1603
Daijs, Jitsuyo

Probably more common now.

https://www.weblio.jp/content/マルチバース
https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUD10CIA0Q2A510C2000000/

See also: 多元宇宙論

GG5

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>vulcanologist</gloss>

http://www.arukazan.jp/bbs/
https://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/火山学者

ペーパーパンチ	580

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ペーパー・パンチ</reb>

https://www.askul.co.jp/p/9326194/
https://www.kaunet.com/rakuraku/variation/00038832/

Abbreviation : パンチ

I agree.

We have an entry for ペン型 as [adj-no] (entry 2561230). I think this is just a normal composition with 消しゴム.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬─────╮
│ ペン型消しゴム　 │ 222 │
│ ペン型の消しゴム │ 138 │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴─────╯

Related: entries 2853775 and 2854306

https://www.monotaro.com/k/store/ペンタイプ 消しゴム/
https://search.kakaku.com/消しゴム ペン型消しゴム/

Thanks

This is probably supposed to be read けっせい.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>けつえきそうたんぱく</reb>
+<reb>けっせいそうたんぱく</reb>

Igaku glossary

血清総蛋白	551	66.0%
血清総タンパク	193	23.1%
血清総蛋白質	56	6.7%
血清総タンパク質	35	4.2%

血清総タンパク（TP）［total protein］
　基準値 6.7～8.3 g/dL
https://www.nutri.co.jp/nutrition/keywords/ch5-3/keyword1/

血清総蛋白(TP)が増加、減少する原因
https://www.doctor-1.com/archives/776

血清総蛋白（けっせいそうタンパク、英語: total serum protein）
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/血清総蛋白

Minimal entry to disambiguate 総蛋白 from "complete protein"

Considered adding "TP" as a gloss. This is an internationally recognized marker that might appear on a blood test result, but I don't see those elsewhere here, so didn't.

There are already a bunch of these 血清* terms, including 血清アルブミン, which is one component of this value. (the other being 血清グロブリン, serum globulin, which we don't have).

In general I wouldn't put [sK] on the nakaguro versions of visible plain forms.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ウェル・メイド</reb>
+<reb>ウエルメイド</reb>
@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<reb>ウエルメイド</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+<reb>ウェル・メイド</reb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ ウェルメイド　 │ 4,903 │ 81.7% │
│ ウエルメイド　 │   851 │ 14.2% │
│ ウェル・メイド │   169 │  2.8% │ - add
│ ウェルメード　 │    80 │  1.3% │
│ ウエル・メイド │     0 │  0.0% │
│ ウェル・メード │     0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

Are these sorts of nakaguro forms supposed to be [sK] now?

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウェル・メイド</reb>

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/4ce165aca6f134c6ee4bdbce6e4ae9bc179ace16?page=2
もう1つがストーリー性。日本人の共感や感動を誘うウェルメイドな人間ドラマが減っていることだ。

ウェルメイド	4903	84.0%
ウェルメード	80	1.4% 
ウエルメード	0	0.0% daijs
ウエルメイド	851	14.6% daijs

https://vgmdb.net/artist/48291

https://vgmdb.net/artist/6394

https://vgmdb.net/artist/5300

https://vgmdb.net/artist/47883