最終目標	170413 "end goal; final target"
最終的な目標	21086
最終の目標	1793

最終目的	107373 "ultimate goal"
最終的な目的	12581
最終の目的	2290

究極の目標	72730	
究極の目的	37379
究極的な目標	2381
究極的な目的	2276

Just noticed, it looks like we may already have an even-higher n-gram "ultimate goal": 最終目標 and/or 最終目的. Current glossing seems inconsistent and maybe a little arbitrary on these entries though.  Are these "ultimate goals" and "ultimate objectives" or "final goals and final objectives" (and, is there a difference? hmmm).

究極の目標	72730	62.7%　　
究極の目的	37379	32.2%
究極目標	3502	3.0%
究極目的	2421	2.1%

In sankoku's entry for 究極, the example usage us 「ーの目的」。(ie. it's common)　N-grams show that 究極の目標 and 究極の目的 are far more common than the contracted forms, but the full forms are not in jmdict, so I can't xref them.

I see gg5 and eij cited, but no kokugos (and google doesn't give me one).

This is one of these cases where I find the entry distracting/misleading as a Japanese learner.  Yes, this term means "final aim".  But the better way to *say* final aim is "究極の目的".

Alternatively, I wouldn't object to creating 究極の目的 and 究極の目標 and xref'ing them together as a sign of relative frequency.  It's a super-common, but also somewhat obvious-looking. Probably no one would think to actively search a dictionary for "final aim", you'd just encounter them by chance (as I have).  Otherwise they seem to fail most basic tests for entry.

If you see 窮極目的in the wild, the meaning is self-evident from 窮極+目的.　

For my part, I'm replacing my flash card for 究極目的 with 究極の目標/究極の目標.  These seem useful enough to me to study.  But not sure any of these belong here.

gg5, eij

'extreme purpose' is rather odd

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>窮極目的</keb>
+<keb>究極目的</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>究極目的</keb>
+<keb>窮極目的</keb>
@@ -15 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>extreme purpose</gloss>
+<gloss>final aim</gloss>
+<gloss>final end</gloss>
+<gloss>supreme end</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

@@ -24,0 +25,2 @@
+<gloss>brake (on inflation, spending, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>check</gloss>
@@ -26,3 +28 @@
-<gloss>curtailment</gloss>
-<gloss>self-imposed limit</gloss>
-<gloss>check</gloss>
+<gloss>(imposed) limit</gloss>

Not [vs] in the smaller kokugos

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 歯止め　　 │ 363,812 │ 99.8% │
│ 歯止めし　 │     320 │  0.1% │
│ 歯止めする │     274 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

gg5, daij

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>drag</gloss>

luminous, wisdom

Sense 3 appears to be archaic. Not in the JEs or smaller kokugos. I think it can be dropped.

@@ -28,4 +28 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<gloss>great quantity (of something)</gloss>
+<gloss>generous</gloss>

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>big hearted</gloss>
+<gloss>big-hearted</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 大らか　 │ 116,309 │ 26.8% │
│ 多らか　 │      24 │  0.0% │ - rK (daijr/s, koj)
│ おおらか │ 317,492 │ 73.2% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

https://kokugo.jitenon.jp/word/p34063

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 土塊　　 │ 17,263 │ 51.8% │
│ 土くれ　 │ 11,455 │ 34.4% │ - add (jitenon)
│ つちくれ │  1,368 │  4.1% │
│ どかい　 │  3,251 │  9.8% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>土くれ</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<re_restr>土塊</re_restr>

I agree. Many references point どかい to つちくれ.

つちくれ seems to be the more common reading.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>どかい</reb>
+<reb>つちくれ</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>つちくれ</reb>
+<reb>どかい</reb>

daij, meikyo

It is a noun. The glosses weren't great.

@@ -22,0 +23,2 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2837561">二足のわらじを履く</xref>
@@ -24,2 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>many irons in the fire</gloss>
-<gloss>engaged in two trades at the same time</gloss>
+<s_inf>oft. as 〜を履く</s_inf>
+<gloss>being engaged in two trades at the same time</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +29,2 @@
+<gloss>having two irons in the fire</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">two pairs of straw sandals</gloss>

It ends in わらじ which is a noun.
It can take the を article (see 二足のわらじを履く). What is the argument for this is not being a noun exactly?

I absolutely think it is.

If it were more common it could go in as [sK].

録 is read ろく so this is either a new word or it's what some IMEs spit out when you mistype にゅうりょく as にゅうろく. I suspect it's the latter.
It gets a reasonable number of web hits but I think we need some solid references.

@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>入録</keb>

入力	74404395
入録	208

Reference?

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>入録</keb>

meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog

@@ -24 +24,3 @@
-<gloss>to get information out of a person</gloss>
+<gloss>to get (information) out of someone</gloss>
+<gloss>to extract (information) from someone</gloss>
+<gloss>to find out (through questioning)</gloss>
@@ -29 +31 @@
-<gloss>to begin listening</gloss>
+<gloss>to begin listening (to)</gloss>

〈聞（き）／きき〉〈出／だ〉し

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 聞き出し │ 128,399 │ 82.6% │
│ 聞きだし │  24,889 │ 16.0% │
│ 聞出し　 │     584 │  0.4% │ - adding (daijr/s, smk)
│ きき出し │     167 │  0.1% │
│ 聞だし　 │       0 │  0.0% │
│ ききだし │   1,440 │  0.9% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>聞出す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

daij, meikyo

@@ -29 +29,2 @@
-<gloss>old unpleasant incident</gloss>
+<gloss>unpleasant past experience</gloss>
+<gloss>painful memory</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 古傷　　 │ 71,264 │ 99.5% │
│ 古疵　　 │    112 │  0.2% │ - rK (daijr/s, koj, etc.)
│ 古創　　 │     46 │  0.1% │ - rK (daijs, shinmeikai)
│ ふるきず │    192 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

daij

Splitting into senses.

@@ -23,0 +24,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>past misdeed</gloss>

gg5, wisdom

Daijr/s have archaic examples for sense 2. I think we can drop it.

@@ -22,4 +22 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>getting on board</gloss>
+<gloss>mariner</gloss>

Smaller kokugos only have the "sailor" sense. All the example sentences seem to be for this sense too.

Daijr/s and koj have the "getting on board" sense

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 船乗り　 │ 142,366 │ 94.1% │
│ 船のり　 │   5,850 │  3.9% │ - add
│ ふね乗り │       0 │  0.0% │
│ ふなのり │   3,093 │  2.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>船のり</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>getting on board</gloss>
+<gloss>sailor</gloss>
+<gloss>seaman</gloss>
@@ -20,2 +25 @@
-<gloss>sailor</gloss>
-<gloss>seaman</gloss>
+<gloss>getting on board</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -25 +25,3 @@
-<gloss>to begin slipping or sliding</gloss>
+<gloss>to start sliding</gloss>
+<gloss>to begin to slide</gloss>
+<gloss>to begin to slip</gloss>
@@ -30 +32,3 @@
-<gloss>to make a start upon</gloss>
+<gloss>to make a start</gloss>
+<gloss>to start (off)</gloss>
+<gloss>to get under way</gloss>

[vi]: meikyo, obunsha

〈滑（り）／すべり〉〈出／だ〉す

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 滑り出す　 │ 14,786 │ 85.6% │
│ 滑りだす　 │  1,445 │  8.4% │
│ すべり出す │    518 │  3.0% │
│ 滑出す　　 │      0 │  0.0% │
│ 滑だす　　 │      0 │  0.0% │
│ すべりだす │    531 │  3.1% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>滑りだす</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>すべり出す</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +29 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

sankoku has [vi]

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

肘枕	966	55.5%
ひじ枕	773	44.5%
GG5: 肘枕をする rest one's head on one's 「elbow [arm].
ルミナス: 彼は*ひじ枕をして寝ている He is sleeping with his head on his arm.
Koj: 自分の肘をまげて枕の代りにすること。
Daijr: 自分の肘を曲げて枕代わりにして横になること。
肘枕する	0
肘枕して	35
肘枕をして	86

I think this is more like it. One may well be l(a)ying on one's side but it doesn't seem to be a core meaning of the term.
The "vs" case is weak.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ひじ枕</keb>
@@ -13 +16 @@
-<gloss>propping one's head up with one arm while laying down on one's side</gloss>
+<gloss>resting one's head on one's arm or elbow</gloss>

Typo( one one's side -> on one's side).  A lot of "one" in this gloss...

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>propping one's head up with one arm while laying down one one's side</gloss>
+<gloss>propping one's head up with one arm while laying down on one's side</gloss>

sankoku: ひじをまげて自分の枕として横になること

Google image search

https://hinative.com/questions/14004763
ひじまくら is "to bend one's elbow and use it instead of a pillow.

Kind of a "lol" here:
Is there a common phrase or a better, shorter way to describe this man's body position?
"He was lying on his side, propped up on one/his elbow, hand supporting his head."

... The answer was "no, not really"

https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/518372/position-description-for-lying-on-the-side-propped-up-on-one-elbow-with-the-han

Trying to figure out how I'd get my head to touch my elbow. (The old gloss also used the plural "elbows".  It's just one.)

Sorry for the long gloss, but I can't find a concise word or phrase for this. 

Not *super* common. For comparison:
肘枕	966
頬杖	46731
膝枕	61100

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>using one's elbows as a pillow</gloss>
+<gloss>propping one's head up with one arm while laying down one one's side</gloss>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>unexplored area (e.g. of study, research)</gloss>
+<gloss>unexplored area (of study, research, etc.)</gloss>

All the JEs I checked have "virgin soil". It's even the Japanese title of Turgenev's novel.
Please use our "e.g." style.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>virgin territory</gloss>
+<gloss>virgin soil</gloss>
@@ -13 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>virgin territory</gloss>
@@ -17 +18 @@
-<gloss>unexplored area (eg. of study, research)</gloss>
+<gloss>unexplored area (e.g. of study, research)</gloss>

reverso gives 27 examples, 26 are "virgin land" and 1 is "virgin territory". 

m-w.com
virgin soil
noun
: soil that has never been cultivated

virgin soil

collins: noun
soil that has not been cultivated before
a person or thing that is as yet undeveloped

sankoku
１。まだ人の手の加わっていない土地。
２。まだ誰も調査・研究をしていない学問分野

daijs 出典：デジタル大辞泉（小学館）
しょじょ‐ち〔シヨヂヨ‐〕【処女地】 の解説
１ まだ開墾されていない土地。
２ 研究・調査などで、まだ手がつけられていない分野。

処女地	4254

I didn't xref this otherwise popular term from 処女 because I thought the gloss was hard to reason about... "virgin soil" was maybe not technically wrong, but it's not an overly familiar term to me in this context.  Seemed overly literal.  Reverso has a bunch of entries for "virgin land", but I didn't look at how many were J->E vs E->J. "virgin territory" was on one entry.

"virgin territory" has the nice property of being a nice gloss for [2] as well, I think. I would have put "virgin territory" as the first entry in [1], but it looks nicer lined up with [2]...

Someone here might have better gloss suggestions.

@@ -12 +12,6 @@
-<gloss>virgin soil</gloss>
+<gloss>uncultivated land</gloss>
+<gloss>virgin territory</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>unexplored area (eg. of study, research)</gloss>

I think "administered" is a better word here. It's what Wikipedia uses.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Southern Kuril Islands (held by Russia, claimed by Japan)</gloss>
+<gloss>Southern Kuril Islands (administered by Russia, claimed by Japan)</gloss>

gg5: the 《Russian-held》 Northern Territories.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Southern Kuril Islands</gloss>
+<gloss>Southern Kuril Islands (held by Russia, claimed by Japan)</gloss>

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>the Southern Kuril Islands</gloss>
-<gloss>the Northern Territories</gloss>
+<gloss>Southern Kuril Islands</gloss>
+<gloss>Northern Territories</gloss>

[vt]: shinmeikai
All the kokugos have 「釣瓶」は当て字 notes

〈つるべ／釣瓶／連べ〉〈うち／打ち／撃ち〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ つるべ打ち │ 3,184 │ 69.6% │
│ つるべ撃ち │   496 │ 10.8% │
│ 釣瓶打ち　 │   377 │  8.2% │ - ateji
│ 釣瓶撃ち　 │    89 │  1.9% │ - sK
│ 連べ打ち　 │    33 │  0.7% │ - rK (daijr/s, smk, meikyo)
│ 釣瓶うち　 │    22 │  0.5% │ - sK
│ 連べうち　 │     0 │  0.0% │
│ 連べ撃ち　 │     0 │  0.0% │
│ つるべうち │   371 │  8.1% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>連べ打ち</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,3 +20 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>連べ打ち</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +24 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -27,0 +32 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Daijr, GG5, etc.
釣瓶打ち	377
つるべ撃ち	496
連べ打ち	33  <- mentioned in Daijr, GG5
つるべ打ち	3184
釣瓶撃ち	89
釣瓶うち	22
連べ撃ち	< 20

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>つるべ打ち</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>つるべ撃ち</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +14,7 @@
-<keb>つるべ撃ち</keb>
+<keb>釣瓶撃ち</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>連べ打ち</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>釣瓶うち</keb>
@@ -16,2 +28,2 @@
-<gloss>fire in rapid succession</gloss>
-<gloss>a volley of shots</gloss>
+<gloss>firing in rapid succession</gloss>
+<gloss>volley of shots</gloss>

Encountered this spelling in the CCs for GATE 自衛隊 彼の地にて、斯く戦えり and ねじ巻き精霊戦記 天鏡のアルデラミン.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>つるべ撃ち</keb>

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

〈年貢／ねんぐ〉の〈納（め）／収（め）／おさめ〉〈時／どき〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 年貢の納め時　　　 │ 12,566 │ 90.4% │
│ 年貢の納めどき　　 │    649 │  4.7% │ - add
│ 年貢の収め時　　　 │    246 │  1.8% │ - add
│ 年貢のおさめどき　 │    201 │  1.4% │ - add
│ 年貢のおさめ時　　 │    122 │  0.9% │
│ 年貢の収めどき　　 │     59 │  0.4% │
│ ねんぐのおさめどき │     52 │  0.4% │
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,12 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>年貢の納めどき</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>年貢の収め時</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>年貢のおさめどき</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +24 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss>lit: time to pay the land tax (in kind)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">time to pay the land tax (in kind)</gloss>

gg5, prog

口を窮めて can be dropped.

@@ -10,4 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>口を窮めて</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -20,0 +17,3 @@
+<gloss>scathingly (criticize, deride, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>(praise) to the skies</gloss>
+<gloss>in the highest possible terms</gloss>

口を極めて	3803	76.2%
口をきわめて	1188	23.8%
口を究めて	0	0.0%
口を窮めて	0	0.0%

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>口をきわめて</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Entry created

I don't think that works, I wouldn't call the use in that heading figurative. Also we're moving away from using the fig tag overall (instead using separate senses when appropriate).

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="fig">50% tax rate</gloss>

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/profile/commentator/ishikawatomohisa/comments/16778403898851.4f11.00046 ②税と社会保険料の合計である国民負担率が約50パーセントと、いわば五公五民となるなか

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss g_type="fig">50% tax rate</gloss>

Remove unsupported yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Entry created

gg5, chujiten, luminous
メリハリの効いた	15,424	55.9%	
メリハリの利いた	11,240	40.8%	
めりはりの利いた	261	0.9%	
めりはりの効いた	613	2.2%

The glosses were definitely off.

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+<keb>めりはりの効いた</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19,4 +24,3 @@
-<gloss>explicit</gloss>
-<gloss>clear</gloss>
-<gloss>unambiguous</gloss>
-<gloss>meaningful</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1630910">メリハリ・1</xref>
+<gloss>well-modulated (voice)</gloss>
+<gloss>nicely varied (writing style)</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +28,2 @@
+<gloss>full-bodied (flavour)</gloss>
+<gloss>complex</gloss>

メリハリの効いた	15424	42.8%
メリハリの利いた	11240	31.2%
メリハリのきいた	7345	20.4%

メリハリを利かせた	427	1.2%
メリハリをきかせた	690	1.9%
メリハリを効かせた	931	2.6%

Add 効
Add adj-f
Not confident this gloss is correct.

Removed xref to far *less* frequent form. (xref target should probably be deleted, comments on that entry)

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>メリハリの効いた</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12,5 +14,0 @@
-<re_restr>めりはりの利いた</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>メリハリのきいた</reb>
-<re_restr>メリハリの利いた</re_restr>
@@ -20,2 +18 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2407870">メリハリを利かせた</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2407870">メリハリを利かせた</xref>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>

Entry created

GG5: めりはりをきかせる modulate one's voice for effect
中辞典: めりはりを利かせる modulate one's voice for effect.

I think this entry is too problematic to keep.

past-tense inflection common, but not completely remarkable:
メリハリを効かせた	931
メリハリを効かせて	609
メリハリを効かせる	254
メリハリを効かせました	44
メリハリを効かせます	31


more-popular xref-form
メリハリの効いた	15424	42.8%
メリハリの利いた	11240	31.2%
メリハリのきいた	7345	20.4%

this form
メリハリを利かせた	427	1.2%
メリハリをきかせた	690	1.9%
メリハリを効かせた	931	2.6%

similar non-existent entry(do we want to create these?):
ドスを効かせた	494	50.8%
ドスを利かせた	365	37.5%
ドスを利かせる	114	11.7%

Added 効

This is the *only* example of a past-tense-causative verb in all of jmdict. (Advanced search: reading ends-with せた)

The consistent thing to do would be to delete this entry, and then to *possibly* create メリハリを効かせる。　メリハリを効かせる　is missing(though arguably not necessary either), and it has other uses.  

Also, I don't think this gloss is right, but I don't have the time to verify that at the moment.

Entry created

GG5: He that toucheth pitch shall be defiled．

I guess this can be closed. Seems OK.

https://www.bible.com/bible/compare/PRO.13.20

Proverbs 13:20 New Century Version (NCV)
Spend time with the wise and you will become wise, but the friends of fools will suffer.

https://yoji-jukugo.com/近朱必赤/#:~:text=人は交わる相手によって,必ず赤くなる」という意味。

http://www.nishikie.com/stories/TNS-1054-6_confessions_of_evil.html
Proverb (allegory) is modified by 朱(しゆ)に交(まぢ)ハれバ赤(あか)くなる (shiyu ni madjihareba akaku naru) -- which today would be written 朱に交われば赤くなる (Shu ni majiwareba akaku naru) -- meaning "when mixing (mingling, associating) with vermilion, one becomes red" -- in other words, one is inspired to be good or evil according to the friends or company one keeps.

The Japanese proverb reflects part of the the Chinese expression 近朱者赤、近墨者黒 (jìn zhū zhĕ chì, jìn mò zhĕ hēi) -- meaning "those tho get close to cinnabar [China] ink become red, [while] those who get close to soot [India] ink become black" -- attributed to the poet Fu Hsuan (傅玄, Fu Xuan, 217-278) -- among other expressions, like 近墨必緇、近朱必赤.

One reason I started looking at this was because of the dated nature of the gloss.  I wasn't familiar with it (doesn't mean it's bad or wrong, of course), so it didn't seem to clarify the meaning for me.  I actually internalized the "bad" reading from the outset, assuming that red=bad (as in 朱を入れる - to make a correction). 

Googling around I see this is a bible verse.  I ran into the "New Century Version" translation, and it seems a bit more accessible. (linked reference has various translations)

"Spend time with the wise and you will become wise, but the friends of fools will suffer."

What do you think? I don't know that any of the various formulations are extremely commonly known, so modern grammar seems preferable to me.  For what it's worth, I told a 50 year old friend about the "lay down with dogs" idiom, which is apparently also biblical, and he wasn't familiar with it.

I search backwards for the longer Chinese expression referencing both vermillion and soot (black), and found what I think is a better literal gloss.  

Also, "influenced by one's environment" is maybe not as specific as it could be (being overshadowed by a lot of talented people might impact someone negatively, for example, but that would be contrary to this idiom).

@@ -14,3 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>you are the company you keep</gloss>
-<gloss>if you lie down with dogs, you will get up with fleas</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="lit">if you mingle with vermillion, you will turn red</gloss>
+<gloss>people will take on the characteristics of those who surround them</gloss>
+<gloss>spend time with the wise and you will become wise, but the friends of fools will suffer</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">when mixing with vermillion, one becomes red</gloss>

If classes are divivided up by current academic performance, then what will happen to students after that...
https://twitter.com/Tontantan3/status/1630420102678978561
しかし成績によるクラス分けがその後「朱に交われば赤くなる」的に大きく影響すると言われればそれは確かにそうだろうとは思うし、

About changing your surroundings to improve
https://twitter.com/minagawashi/status/1628500627017064449
「朱に交われば赤くなる」。あなたはきっと良い方向へ変わっていける！

That's a good catch... I think I was influenced by some of the older glosses that float around, like "he who touches pitch shall be defiled therewith" and "one rotten apple spoils the barrel", and happened to stumble into a Japanese writeup that confirmed what I expected to hear.

"you are the company you keep" is, I think, usually used judgmentally, and about the quality of one's character (not financial or academic success, etc., or professional sports performance, as I saw in one post). 

朱に交われば赤くなる seems to be a lot more, general in observing that people will be influenced by the environment they are placed it. (there may also be a judgemental after-the-fast usage, but it's certainly not the only usage).

"with wolves", like the older, dropped "pitch" gloss, seems far too negative for how this is used in practice... I might suggest just reverting to where things were, not sure I have anything to add from that. Will think about it

Looking at examples on Twitter, I don't think ふつう、悪い意味の時に使う。 is true.

Important warning given on https://proverb-encyclopedia.com/syunimaziwarreba/
ふつう、悪い意味の時に使う。
「うちの子は進学塾に通うようになったら、朱に交われば赤くなるで、熱心に勉強して成績が上がるようになったの。」
と使うのは誤り。

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/if_you_lie_down_with_dogs,_you_get_up_with_fleas#:~:text=Proverb,-if you lie&text=Spending time with undesirable people,take on their undesirable traits.

"Spending time with undesirable people will cause one to take on their undesirable traits."

Some different gloss suggestions...

You could drop the dogs/flees gloss and just leave "you are the company you keep". I think it's basically a perfect match. (Especially if you want to preserve the theoretical ambiguity that it could be used in a positive sense).

In reply to Marcus's comments from 2020, I suspect the 国語辞典 has been lazy with discussing the nuance. 
As with this English saying, in theory it means "if you spend time with bad people, you'll get bad habits, if you spend time with good people, you'll get good habits".

But it's only really used as a cautionary admonition towards people who are doing bad things. (See reference note, ふつう、悪い意味の時に使う. Also, all example sentences in reference are negative）

We rarely say "you are the company the company you keep" of people who spend all their time working with charities and volunteer groups.

==== Note for curious === 
Apparently from a longer Chinese saying, same meaning -  that mixed with black ink turns black, that mixed with vermillion turns red.  What I read wasn't apparent about whether red and black were inherently good or bad - more just the notion that your surroundings rub off on you.

@@ -14,2 +14,3 @@
-<gloss>people are formed by their surroundings</gloss>
-<gloss>walk with the wise and become wise; associate with fools and get in trouble</gloss>
+<gloss>you are the company you keep</gloss>
+<gloss>if you lie down with dogs, you will get up with fleas</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">if you mingle with vermillion, you will turn red</gloss>

gg5, prog
庇を貸して	1,626		
ひさしを貸して	666
母屋を取られ	908		
母屋をとられ	178

yard/ell -> mile

@@ -5,0 +6,12 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ひさしを貸して母屋を取られる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>庇を貸して母屋をとられる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ひさしを貸して母屋をとられる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,2 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>give him an inch and he'll take an ell</gloss>
-<gloss>give him an inch and he'll take a yard</gloss>
+<gloss>to have one's kindness taken advantage of</gloss>
+<gloss>give him an inch and he'll take a mile</gloss>

庇 - eaves.
Trimming.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">to lend out the leaves but have the whole house taken from one</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">to lend out the eaves but have one's whole house taken</gloss>

Koj imidas

The Japanese is actually an idiom rather than a proverb (my bad). Not sure the "give sb an inch" can be worked into an idiom? 
"to give someone an inch and have a wole yard taken"? it's a little awkward.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<misc>&proverb;</misc>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
@@ -15,0 +16,7 @@
+<gloss g_type="lit">to lend out the leaves but have the whole house taken from one</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>to have a favor returned with spite</gloss>

Cambridge phrasing:
give someone an inch and they'll take a mile
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/give-someone-an-inch-and-they-ll-take-a-mile

Weblio gloss for 庇を貸して母屋を取られる
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/give+him+an+inch+and+he'll+take+a+mile 
Give him an inch and he'll take a mile [a yard].
彼にひさしを貸したら母屋まで取られるよ

Totally Japanese reference for variant: 軒のきを貸して母屋おもやを取られる
https://japanese-note.jp/noki-omoya/
英文	Give him an inch and he’ll take a mile.
彼に庇を貸したら母屋まで取られるよ
（直訳:彼に少しでも与えたら善意に付け込まれるよ)

Alternate suggestion, single gloss only: 

give someone an inch and they'll take a mile

========= Long winded reasoning
Before adding a new entry for a variant of this Japanese idiom, I'd like to add to the discussion on the current glosses, and see if something different might be considered. 

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
庇を貸して母屋	1530
軒を貸して母屋	908    NEW

Adding to Stephen's comment, I have also have never heard the "ell" formation (though it's fair to say I'm not well versed in literature).  Kids these days I guess... (I'm 42). I also immediately though "wouldn't mile be better than yard?"  Obviously all of these formulations, and a number of variants (give 'em an inch, give them an inch, give someone an inch) are all in circulation(with "ell" appearing to be the origin)

Currently, Cambridge Dictionary online has a single, modern / gender-neutral formulation:

- give someone an inch and they'll take a mile

No mention of yards or ells. If it were me, I would just use this gloss alone.  I think it's likely to be readily understood by native English speakers, and safe to use for Japanese learners who acquire it via jmdict (I would not necessarily say the same of the "inch/ell" formulation).

===== 

Just looking at cute quotations and comic images, if you do a google image search for just the quoted prefix, you get the following rough counts for "miles", "yards", "foot", "ells", and "furlongs"(hah)...    As you move toward gender neutrality (~modern usage), miles seems to gain in popularity.

"give someone an inch" 17 miles, 1 yard, 0 ells
"give them an inch" 12 miles, 2 yards, 0 ells
"give em an inch". 6 miles, 2 x "foot", 1 furlong, 0 ells
"give him an inch" 3 miles, 5 yards, 2 ells    (there were a bunch of additional t-shirts with the "yard" expression)

Also anecdotally, a twitter search for "give someone an inch" seems to be entirely "miles" (though other formulations sometimes yield different results)

GG5: 【哲】 〔アリストテレスの説く 4 原因の 1 つ〕 the final cause.

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2513930">質料因・しつりょういん</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2513920">形相因・けいそういん</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2513950">作用因・さよういん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2513930">質料因</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2513920">形相因</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2513950">作用因</xref>

四原因説
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/四原因説
質料因（羅: causa materialis) 
形相因（羅: causa formalis）
作用因（羅: causa efficiens）
目的因（羅: causa finalis）

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/目的因/
アリストテレスの説いた四原因の一。....  →形相因 →質料因 →動力因 (daijs)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_causes
See also: Potentiality and actuality
This article uses the word 'cause' in its traditional scholarly philosophical sense, not to be confused with the word's main usage in current ordinary language.

Main purpose of edit: communicate "do not use if you don't know exactly what this is".

===

Funny... do we really want these entries?  If so, need to update the other three as well. In daijs :)

It would seem they were created as a set.

Aristotles 4 causes:
四原因説	156    MISSING in jmdict (not in daijs, which just lists the 4 causes as I have done)
質料因	760	20.8%
形相因	727	19.9%
作用因	725	19.9%
目的因	1283	35.1%

@@ -12 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>final cause</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2513930">質料因・しつりょういん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2513920">形相因・けいそういん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2513950">作用因・さよういん</xref>
+<field>&phil;</field>
+<gloss>final cause (one of Aristotle's four fundamental types of answer to the question "why?")</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1780460">近因</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2517460">究極要因・きゅうきょくよういん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2517460">究極要因</xref>
+<field>&phil;</field>
@@ -15,2 +15 @@
-<field>&phil;</field>
-<gloss>proximate cause (vs. ultimate cause)</gloss>
+<gloss>proximate cause (in contrast to an ultimate cause)</gloss>

See comments at new xref.

@@ -13 +13,5 @@
-<gloss>proximate cause</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2517460">究極要因・きゅうきょくよういん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2517460">究極要因・きゅうきょくよういん</xref>
+<field>&biol;</field>
+<field>&phil;</field>
+<gloss>proximate cause (vs. ultimate cause)</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2517450">至近要因・しきんよういん</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2517450">至近要因・しきんよういん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2517450">至近要因</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2517450">至近要因</xref>
+<field>&phil;</field>
@@ -15,2 +16 @@
-<field>&phil;</field>
-<gloss>ultimate cause (vs. proximate cause)</gloss>
+<gloss>ultimate cause (in contrast to a proximate cause)</gloss>

"Is the evolutionalist approach valid for studies of animal psychology?"
by Goto and Ushitani (2008)
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/janip/advpub/0/advpub_58.2.6/_pdf/-char/ja

(can cross-reference the english and japanese introductions to verify terminology)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proximate_and_ultimate_causation

https://kotobank.jp/word/究極要因-1524077#:~:text=くよういん-,ultimate factor,群のことをいう。

The ultimate point of this edit is "please don't learn/use this if you don't know exactly what it is".

old xref appeared to be unrelated.

究極要因	657
至近要因	495

@@ -12,3 +12,4 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2513910">目的因</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2513910">目的因</xref>
-<gloss>final cause</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2517450">至近要因・しきんよういん</xref>
+<field>&biol;</field>
+<field>&phil;</field>
+<gloss>ultimate cause (vs. proximate cause)</gloss>

Entry created

I feel the あやつける, etc. forms need to be visible as they make up a reasonable proportion of the use. If they were marginal I think sK/sk would be OK.

Is having a separate entry really better? The を can essentially be dropped from any expression including it.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2857543">文つける</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2857543">あやつける</xref>

We could, but it's probably better to put it in its own entry.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2857543">文つける</xref>

https://www.keiben-oasis.com/keibenterms/アヤつける　　

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1233337122
アヤをつけられる
_たまに耳にする言葉ですが-、アヤとはどういう意味ですか？ (my emphasis)


文つける	131	47.1%
アヤつける	108	38.8%
あやつける	39	14.0%

If it's dialectal it's likely underrepresented in writing, doesn't necessarily mean it really is all that rare. Also seems weird to tag something both rare and uk. I wonder to what extent あや/文 really is uk, also. It's the first option in my android IME.

Should we include を-less glosses as sk/sK in entries like this one?

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アヤをつける</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -14 +17,0 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1583270">飛沫・しぶき</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1583270">しぶき</xref>

@@ -26 +26 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2000120">飛沫感染・ひまつかんせん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2000120">飛沫感染</xref>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 飛沫　 │ 148,587 │ 98.4% │
│ 飛まつ │   2,402 │  1.6% │ - sK
│ ひまつ │   2,106 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

True, the JEs just have one sense too. However, it's what's used in Japanese when referring to droplets and the EJs give it for droplets. Since they are different things in English (we wouldn't say "spray infection" for 飛沫感染) I think they're best not put into the one sense.

Cama cross this online. It's in OL also

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>EBF</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2799040">完全母乳・かんぜんぼにゅう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2799040">完全母乳</xref>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>feeding an infant solely with breast milk (i.e. no formula)</gloss>
+<gloss>exclusive breastfeeding</gloss>

Worth putting the full form in.

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2799040">完全母乳・かんぜんぼにゅう</xref>
@@ -13,1 +14,0 @@
-<s_inf>abbrev. of 完全母乳</s_inf>

http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q127
0229272
"完母って本当に楽ですか？ １ヶ月半の赤ちゃんを母乳寄りの混合で育てています。"
http://ameblo.jp/hiro-sugar0707/entry-11271850256.html
"ベビィを抱っこしていて、
不思議な質問をされたコトがある。
突然
「完母（かんぼ）？」
って聞かれるのだ。
最初はよく聞き取れなくて、
えっ？？
って聞き返すことが何回かあったのだが
どうやら、
「完全に母乳だけで育ててるのですか？」
の略らしい。"
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/fish-b/20120512/1336786551
"完全母乳という言葉を問い直す"
http://allabout.co.jp/gm/gc/198362/2/
”完全母乳育児を、「完母（かんぼ）」と呼び、「えーっ、○○さん完母なの、すごー
い」なんて楽しそうに喋っている若いママたちや、カフェに座り、オシャレなスリングで人
目からそっと隠しながらベビーに母乳をあげている自然体のママを見かけたりすると、母
乳育児の広がりを感じさせられます。"

no hits for する etc. on ngram but there's some google hits for 
it.

wisdom: 中国の領土の広さは日本とは桁が違う  In terms of territory, there is no comparison between Japan and China.

I don't mind dropping "poles apart" and "wildly different".
Given that this expressions is used to emphasise the size/extent of a difference, I think "completely" should be in there somewhere.
I think "stand no comparison" is fine. It's idiomatic. Daijr even has "比べものにならない" in its definition for 桁が違う.
I don't think a lit gloss is needed here.

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>to be on a (completely) different level</gloss>
@@ -27 +28,2 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">to be of a different order of magnitude</gloss>
+<gloss>to be of a different order of magnitude</gloss>
+<gloss>to stand no comparison</gloss>

I just want to comment I'm not convinced that lit is literal enough, I'm not a big fan of "order of magnitude" for 桁, it's not wrong but I feel it's not all that literal.

〈桁／けた／ケタ〉が〈違／ちが〉う

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 桁が違う　　 │ 18,466 │ 68.3% │
│ ケタが違う　 │  6,909 │ 25.5% │ - add
│ 桁がちがう　 │    667 │  2.5% │ - add
│ けたが違う　 │    498 │  1.8% │ - sK
│ ケタがちがう │    460 │  1.7% │
│ けたがちがう │     53 │  0.2% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,7 @@
+<keb>ケタが違う</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>桁がちがう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

GG5: differ widely 《from…》; be 「widely different [poles apart] 《from…》; be on a different order of magnitude 《from…》; make [stand] no comparison 《with…》; be no match 《for…》
中辞典: be ┏widely different [poles apart] 《from》; be in a different class 《from》; stand no comparison 《with》; be no match 《for》
桁が違う	18466	97.4%
けたが違う	498	2.6%

I'm not sure culling all those glosses Robin put in has improved it at all. They certainly matched what is in the major JEs.
けたが違う is in GG5. Otherwise I'd suggest sK.

Add POS to proverbs
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>

JLD

daij, enwiktionary (as 女賢しゅうして牛売り損なう)

My take on daij's definitions.

Looks OK.

daij, koj

I felt the glosses for this were a bit off. I struggled to come up with my own so improvements are welcome. The last one is from GG5.

@@ -14,3 +14,4 @@
-<gloss>women are not as clever as they think</gloss>
-<gloss>women should know their place</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="lit">even a clever woman will fail at selling a cow</gloss>
+<gloss>even a clever woman is bound to mess up</gloss>
+<gloss>a woman's intelligence only goes so far</gloss>
+<gloss>female sagacity overreaches itself</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">a clever woman fails to sell a cow</gloss>

As さかしうて in koj, btw.

Add POS to proverbs
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>

JLD

掛け値	33906	  
掛け値なし	26488	  
掛け値無し	3817	  
掛け値なく	1123

I see it's actually the most common use of 掛け値. I'll add a note to sense to of 掛け値, and we can drop this.

wisdom: 掛け値なしの値段  a net price.
gg5: 掛け値なしで　frankly speaking; to be frank [plain] with you; to be candid
     掛け値なしに 30 キロも先　《be》 a good [fully] 30 kilometers farther; be 30 kilometers farther, without exaggeration

I don't think this is needed. A+B.
It's only adverbial with に or で.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 掛け値なし │ 26,488 │ 81.5% │
│ 掛け値無し │  3,817 │ 11.7% │
│ 掛値なし　 │  1,270 │  3.9% │ - add (jitsuyou)
│ 掛値無し　 │    337 │  1.0% │ - add
│ かけねなし │    606 │  1.9% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>掛値なし</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>掛値無し</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

GG5, etc. (most JEs have it in examples of sense 2 of 掛け値)
掛け値なし	26488
掛け値なしの	8638
掛け値なしに	13611

@@ -14 +14,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1821230">掛け値・かけね・2</xref>
@@ -16,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>factual</gloss>

@@ -34,0 +35 @@
+<gloss g_type="lit">to wear two pairs of straw sandals</gloss>

〈二足／二束／にそく〉の〈草鞋／わらじ〉を〈履／は〉く

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 二足のわらじを履く　 │ 3,940 │ 59.6% │
│ 二足の草鞋を履く　　 │   925 │ 14.0% │
│ 二足のわらじをはく　 │   720 │ 10.9% │ - sK
│ 二束のわらじを履く　 │   516 │  7.8% │ - add
│ 二束の草鞋を履く　　 │   211 │  3.2% │ - add
│ 二足の草鞋をはく　　 │   130 │  2.0% │ - sK
│ 二束のわらじをはく　 │   112 │  1.7% │
│ 二束の草鞋をはく　　 │    25 │  0.4% │
│ にそくのわらじをはく │    31 │  0.5% │
╰─ーーーーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12,9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>二束のわらじを履く</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>二束の草鞋を履く</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +24 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +31 @@
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>

Yes, I looked at the kokugo explanations too quickly.
I feel that with 180 in the n-grams it's worth having a go at it. If it was < 50 I'd probably drop it.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>harmonious and courteous married couple</gloss>
+<gloss>harmony and courtesy in a marriage</gloss>

daijr: 夫婦が仲よくて，礼儀正しいこと。

Doesn't refer to the couple itself. I don't have any suggestions for how it should be glossed.
Without JEs or contemporary examples to refer to, I feel we're a bit in the dark when it comes to glossing archaic terms like this. Relying on definitions alone will inevitably lead to inaccurate glosses in some cases. It's one of the reasons I'd rather we didn't accept archaic terms as a general rule.
I don't think an entry like this has much value.

関雎	180
Koj, Daijr, etc.

I think this is enough. I don't think it's actually an aphorism.

@@ -13,3 +13 @@
-<misc>&aphorism;</misc>
-<s_inf>from '詩経', 関関雎鳩's abbreviation</s_inf>
-<gloss>Harmonious and courteous married couple</gloss>
+<gloss>harmonious and courteous married couple</gloss>

日本国語大辞典

Aligning.
I don't think [rare] is appropriate here. The counts aren't much lower than 睨みを利かせる's.

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<keb>睨みを効かす</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,3 +19 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>睨みを効かす</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -25,3 +27 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2791910">睨みを利かせる・にらみをきかせる・1</xref>
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>to have authority over</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2791910">睨みをきかせる・1</xref>
@@ -28,0 +29 @@
+<gloss>to influence</gloss>
@@ -33,5 +34,4 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2791910">睨みを利かせる・にらみをきかせる・2</xref>
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>to glare</gloss>
-<gloss>to scowl at</gloss>
-<gloss>to glower at</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2791910">睨みをきかせる・2</xref>
+<gloss>to glare (at)</gloss>
+<gloss>to scowl</gloss>
+<gloss>to glower</gloss>

睨みをきかす	1287	30.7%
にらみをきかす	895	21.4%
睨みを利かす	854	20.4%
にらみを利かす	447	10.7%
にらみを効かす	319	7.6%
睨みを効かす	389	9.3%

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>睨みをきかす</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>にらみを効かす</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>睨みを効かす</keb>

https://thesaurus.weblio.jp/content/睨みを利かす

利かせる
睨みを利かせて	3180	61.3%
にらみを利かせて	1334	25.7%

利かす
睨みを利かして	446	8.6%
にらみを利かして	231	4.5%

Just about the end of matching up 利かす and 利かせる.

This form is 13% of actual use, so seems to warrant inclusion with the others. Seems preferable to mark [rare] for pedagogical reasons, but maybe the numbers are too high?

Couldn't actually find a dictionary to back this one up, interestingly.  But it's not hard to google examples (and the n-grams are there).

There was some conversation on the xref thread about whether "glare/scowl" was a common sense.  Image search suggests that it absolutely is (lots of pet animals). Here, for example, are a bird and two cats (using this form 利かす).

https://twitter.com/mpmb7/status/1537723679312080896
https://twitter.com/shojiyukiya/status/1585475594669547520
https://twitter.com/fcummavo/status/1329235154787680256

https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095737502
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DyingClue

Certainly not wasei.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">dying message</lsource>
-<gloss>message left by a dying murder victim (esp. in mystery novels)</gloss>
+<gloss>dying message (message left by a murder victim just before death; in mystery novels, etc.)</gloss>

GG5: 〔殺人被害者が死の直前に残したメッセージ〕 a dying message.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ダイイング・メッセージ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10 +13 @@
-<gloss>message left before dying (e.g. written in blood) (esp. in mystery novels)</gloss>
+<gloss>message left by a dying murder victim (esp. in mystery novels)</gloss>

daijisen

趣味	22542842
趣味を持つ	58107

Compared with 趣味 itself this expression is quite rare. There are other more obvious ones.

I don't think we've added any [noun]を[noun]する expressions in recent years. The only collocations we tend to accept nowadays are non-literal idiomatic phrases.

I'm not seeing a strong case for including this.

Re: a+b
See: 趣味を極める

I agree this entry is a+b in isolation, but it is misleading for a Japanese learner to see 趣味を極める as the sole gloss for "pursue a hobby" in jmdict. And, I think the case for 趣味を極める is quite strong. (Also, as noted in n-grams, this is a preferable form over many other terms glossed "pursue", so it is not completely without value on its own).

A+B

I think it's time to pull the plug here.

趣味	22542842
趣味を極める	1787
趣味を持つ	58107

My concern about this proposed entry is that it's a comparatively rare expression. If it was the standard way of saying one is following a hobby I'd expect it to be more than 0.01% of the usage of 趣味. It's not in any of the examples in the JEs, nor in any of the 125 Tanaka sentences using 趣味.

I'm not seeing a strong case for including this. Somebody coming across the Japanese phrase will face no issue with understanding it based on our current entries for 趣味 and 極める. I don't think 極める has a different meaning here than it does usually, but it might be that our entry for it could have more senses and glosses added to it.

Re: a+b

Of the many, many glosses of all of the きわめる entries, "pursue" is not currently one of them (although maybe it should be).

If someone saw this term in isolation in the J->E direction and tried to translate it as a one-off, they might think it carries more weight than it actually does.

In E->J direction, it is all but impossible to guess that this is, apparently, is one of the most common form of "to pursue a hobby". (追求 would be a logical guess).

Machine translations all seem to gloss this incorrectly, so it doesn't seem so obvious to them.

A+B

daijr: （企業，組織間で交わす文書などで）現にその職務についている自分自身をへりくだっていう語。
jitsuyo: 職場において自分をへりくだって言う語。ただし、一般的に用いられる表現ではないとする見方もある。なお、「小職」は官職が用いる一人称である。
G n-grams: 1536

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&pn;</pos>
@@ -13,2 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>my work</gloss>
-<gloss>my duties</gloss>
+<s_inf>used in correspondence with other companies, organizations, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>I</gloss>
+<gloss>me</gloss>

Daijr

https://iss.ndl.go.jp/sp/show/R100000039-I002203879-00/
インタニー及法人に対し公平な機会を与えよ /

アメリカを生きぬぃた日本人: 屈辱と栄光の百年 - Page 147
books.google.com › books
岡元彩子 · 1980 · ‎Snippet view
ただ問題は、インタニー(被収容者)である日本人の方にも ...

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>インタニー</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

Plenty of examples in Google Books.

0 n-grams. Not in any references. Very few WWW hits

Not sure it should be included. Doesn't seem to be actually used in Japanese.

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>(civilian) internee (in a US internment camp)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>internee</gloss>

https://www.asahi.com/sp/articles/ASR103K02R1WUHBI01G.html
暑さにうだるインターニー（収容者）達は年中ショートパンツ1枚の裸暮らしで、シャツを着ることは稀（まれ）だった」.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>internee</gloss>
+<gloss>(civilian) internee (in a US internment camp)</gloss>

saw in old book
wwii context

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="por" ls_type="part">pão</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng" ls_type="part">maker</lsource>

パンメーカー	7903

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パン・メーカー</reb>

https://search.rakuten.co.jp/search/mall/パンメーカー/

@@ -10 +10,2 @@
-<gloss>detuning (engine, guitar, etc.)</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>detuning (an engine, guitar, etc.)</gloss>

デチューン	10256	
KOD: ～する 〔意図的に機械の性能を落としたり楽器の音程をずらしたりする〕 detune 《an engine》; put 《a guitar》 out of tune.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>unprecedented monetary easing by the Bank of Japan in 2013</gloss>
+<gloss>unprecedented monetary easing (by the Bank of Japan in 2013)</gloss>

KOD says it's an abbreviation of 異次元の金融緩和 which is already an entry. I think they should be aligned.

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>Quantitative and Qualitative Monetary Easing (done by the BOJ from 2013)</gloss>
-<gloss>QQE</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2853828">異次元の金融緩和</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>unprecedented monetary easing by the Bank of Japan in 2013</gloss>

https://www.ifinance.ne.jp/glossary/japan/jap125.html

KOD: (地球温暖化対策推進法 entry) the Law to Promote Measures to Deal with Global Warming.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (abbr)</gloss>
+<field>&law;</field>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/地球温暖化対策の推進に関する法律

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures</gloss>
+<gloss>Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (abbr)</gloss>

wiki

https://oggi.jp/6256679

I think でゎでゎ is best as sk.

I won't be surprised if でゎでゎ stays [sk], but as a learner/linguist I would like to say it feels like a shame to hide でゎでゎ as a surface form.  

It may be 2% of total use, but with 20,000 hits it's quite common considered in isolation.  It's not a spelling error either, it's a "correct" informal use.

Seeing the form gives a sense of who is using this (young people), and also makes it clear why でわでわ is on the list.  I don't think people are likely to use it on accident, but it might spark some interesting conversations with natives.  

*I* only discovered this because the linked reference on ではでは *also* went out of its way to mention this form. That's how common it is (in certain circles).

jmdict has entries for 草(LOL), a note  "See also ｗ, multiple repetitions of "w" ("LOL") resembles grass: wwwwww", and other fun entries.  I think that's to its credit. Well, my 2p.

So you don't all have to watch the youtuber video (very cute though) here's 90% transcript: (Speaker is a young Japanese woman whose father is texan but was principally raised in Japan. Bilingual, but stronger in Japanese; broadcasts in both languages).

    "dewadewa, I say this a lot. dewa dewa dewa. It's kinda like a - well, then... when you change the subject or something like that, you add the dewa dewa... so, before you guys were talking about something completely different, added dewa dewa, you can change it to the different topic, or, bring it back to the previous topic. ........ I like to se dewadewa, or それでは, or those kinds of words, because I don't like being silent [while thinking of what to say].... BUT ALSO we use dewa dewa as sayonara as well.  dewa! like that, like, bye! dewa dewa, like that. It means sayonara or goodbye".

====

In the expression below, it's a preamble to "goodbye".  "well them, everyone have a good weekend, goodnight".
でゎでゎ素敵な週末を🙋
おやすみなさい💤😪

Is ではでは really used to mean "so;then"? I think it's only used to say bye?

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -24 +25 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1008450">では・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1008450">では・2</xref>

「ではでは」の意味と使い方・メール・LINEでの使い方
https://mayonez.jp/topic/1020677
「は」を「わ」と表記するのは若者言葉  わ is for young people

Note on the dangers of わ form instead of は: (are you a middle school student talking to your friends? If not, maybe don't use でわでわ or でゎでゎ )
「でわでわ」と表記すると印象が悪い
「は」を「わ」と表記しているのは、一般的に中高生が友達同士の会話内くらいですので、使用するシーンによっては相手に幼稚な印象を与えてしまいます。どんな場であれ「でわでわ」といった表記はしない方が無難でしょう。

Twitter search for the colloquial form でわでわ. Lots and lots of hits:
https://twitter.com/search?q=でわでわ&src=typed_query
example:
https://twitter.com/Bic_shintoueki/status/1631623447066583040
でわでわ❣️またね👋ばいばいしーん🫶

でゎでゎ common as well:
https://twitter.com/Mihail_pianista/status/1573324946885193730
でゎでゎ素敵な週末を🙋
おやすみなさい💤😪

Extensive video English on SPOKEN ではでは by native Japanese speaker ... :)
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5x71M7rjOT4

ではでは	873004
でわでわ	89516
でゎでゎ	17579

Decided to err on the side of [col]. The forms using わ are definitely col, and probably [net-sl]. However, ではでは is also a spoken form, and this is how I actually first encountered it.  See video reference if you like.

possibly seen by some as sitting between じゃ and では in terms of formality.

Added "bye bye" as a gloss to try and emphasize some of the attached nuance.

Otherwise not sure if there's a good way to identify でわでわ and でゎでゎ is obviously more colloquial than ではでは (two separate entries?). 

Learned about this in the attached video, which is quite extensive on the usage of ではでは. "Well then" or "goodbye".  Roughly the same meanings as では[1].　Informal. Googled the referenced, giant writeup on the etiquette and implications of using this form.

Wasn't sure I trusted the n-grams till I saw でゎでゎ was 1/4 of でわでわ, which was 1/10th of ではでは.  That seems pretty reasonable.

Linked website says it's fine to use in emails in closing(probable peers on friendly terms), fine to use in conversation. DO NOT use to superiors, but that's true of lots of things (それでは is also not recommended for 目上の人 and it doesn't have[col] or anything).

国家主義的	13,031		
民族主義的	12,480		
国粋主義的	5,221

Not the only word for "nationalistic".
I don't think it's needed. The only other -主義的 term we have is 帝国主義的, which probably isn't needed either.

民族主義	111712	89.9%
民族主義的	12480	10.0%

民族主義+的. A regular and common use of 的. I don't think it's needed.

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版; 英辞郎１０３; ２５万語医学用語大辞典 英和／和英

Oops.

ら -> り

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>分からみ</keb>
+<keb>分かりみ</keb>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/わかりみ
https://numan.tokyo/words/kZmHp
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/わかりみ
https://www.oricon.co.jp/article/1583432/
最近はネットだけでなく、日常会話でも耳にすることが増えましたよね。

I suggest trimming it to わからみ.
Maybe not limited to the Internet but definitely slang. Seems very similar to the English slang "mood", but that's probably too opaque as a gloss.
The link you posted says that it may already be a 死語. Certainly not very common on Twitter. Less than a dozen hits in February.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>わかりみが深い</keb>
+<keb>分からみ</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>わかりみがふかい</reb>
+<reb>わかりみ</reb>
@@ -11,5 +11,6 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<gloss>fully understanding</gloss>
-<gloss>sympathetic with someone's opinion</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>agreement (with something someone has said)</gloss>
+<gloss>understanding</gloss>
+<gloss>relatable feeling</gloss>

わかりみが深い	0
分かりみが深い	0
わかりみがふかい	0
Jitsuyo
https://jp.quizcastle.com/dictionary/eo4k3rlkrm
Many WWW hits.

Ref says it was net-slang but has become more widely used. Possible.

@@ -11,2 +11,5 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>To understand very well, full understanding</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>fully understanding</gloss>
+<gloss>sympathetic with someone's opinion</gloss>

Judging from tweets.

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

文付ける	32	10.3%
文つける	131	42.3%
アヤつける	108	34.8%
あやつける	39	12.6%

See 2582630.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Ōkawa Ryūhou (1956.7.7-2023.3.2)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ōkawa Ryūhō (1956.7.7-2023.3.2)</gloss>

wiki

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Ookawa Ryūhou (1956.7-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ōkawa Ryūhou (1956.7.7-2023.3.2)</gloss>

 Ryuu to Ryū conversion
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Ookawa Ryuuhou (1956.7-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ookawa Ryūhou (1956.7-)</gloss>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Thanks.

https://dic.nicovideo.jp/a/民明書房
ここまで読んでいただけた賢明な読者の方々ならば、『民明書房』が架空の出版社である事はおわかりいただけるだろう。

It's definitely fictional. Niconicopedia has a whole joke article about it.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<misc>&fict;</misc>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<gloss>Minmeishobō (book publisher)</gloss>
+<gloss>Minmeishobō (publishing company featured in the manga series "Sakigake!! Otokojuku")</gloss>

I think they exist.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<misc>&fict;</misc>

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/民明書房
民明書房とは、漫画「魁!!男塾」に登場する架空の出版社。 

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬────────╮
│ 民明書房　　　　 │ 21,018 │
│ みんめいしょぼう │     58 │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴────────╯

@@ -11,2 +11,3 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
-<gloss>Minmeishobou</gloss>
+<misc>&fict;</misc>
+<misc>&company;</misc>
+<gloss>Minmeishobō (book publisher)</gloss>