I guess if it's bigger than Sacramento (#2853293) it can stay.

Wiki tells me Austin is the 11th-most-populous city in the United States. The only state capital with a larger population than Austin on that list is New York City. Population isn't everything but if Austin is not considered a "significant" state capital then we should probably not bother mentioning "capital cities" of Anglosphere states and provinces in policy at all.

Thanks for reminding me. If we're not including all US state capitals, this can go.

"(US)" is used in 40 entries, "(USA)" in 14. They should be aligned. I prefer "US". We don't mention the state on any US city entries, as far as I know.
The editorial policy on proper names in JMdict was tweaked about a year ago to add "(if significant)" to the "states and provinces of English-speaking countries and their capital cities" category. (See the discussion on 1077200.)
Austin is one of the larger US state capitals but I'm not sure it's needed here.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Austin (Texas, USA)</gloss>
+<gloss>Austin (US)</gloss>

GG5, etc.

True

@@ -4,3 +4,3 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>オースチンと緑が一緒に住むかも？</keb>
-</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>オースティン</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>オースティン</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -15 +12 @@
-<gloss>Austin</gloss>
+<gloss>Austin (Texas, USA)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_streamer

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<field>&internet;</field>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>live streamer</gloss>

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<field>&fish;</field>

daij
http://weekly.ascii.jp/elem/000/000/409/409090/

Added senses.
Example of sense 2 in the link above.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>ストリーマ</reb>
+<reb>ストリーマー</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ストリーマー</reb>
+<reb>ストリーマ</reb>
@@ -12,2 +12,11 @@
-<gloss>streamer</gloss>
-<gloss>streaming tape drive</gloss>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>tape streamer</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>(online) streamer</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2497860">ストリーマーフライ</xref>
+<gloss>streamer fly</gloss>

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

daijr/s, koj, obunsha

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>降り</keb>

See comment on the 上り entry.

@@ -34,3 +34,4 @@
-<xref type="ant">上り・4</xref>
-<field>&comp;</field>
-<gloss>download</gloss>
+<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1352510">上り・4</xref>
+<gloss>downstream</gloss>
+<gloss>downhill</gloss>

https://www.bbiq.jp/hikari/column/wifi/speed/

@@ -30,0 +31,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="ant">上り・4</xref>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>download</gloss>

daij, koj, meikyo, prog

It's still quite specific.

@@ -16,3 +16,14 @@
-<gloss>(leadership) address</gloss>
-<gloss>(presidential) message</gloss>
-<gloss>(papal) decree</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1627940">一般教書</xref>
+<gloss>message (delivered by the US president or a state governor)</gloss>
+<gloss>address</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>(papal) bull</gloss>
+<gloss>decree</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1237020">教科書</xref>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
+<gloss>textbook</gloss>

GG5, etc.

Not just presidents.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>(leadership) address</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>(papal) decree</gloss>

gg5

@@ -18,2 +18 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>capital city</gloss>
+<gloss>capital (city)</gloss>

JEs don't split and the kokugos do.

@@ -23 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>sinker (fishing)</gloss>
+<field>&fish;</field>
+<gloss>sinker</gloss>

綜括 is in Koj and Daij

[rK] is fine.

そうかつ：0.02% 綜
総括	1080417
綜括	227

0.08% 綜 (most common usage)
総括的	57566
綜括的	46


Breakdown...	  
綜括	227
綜括不動産 51（This is the *name* of an actual real estate company https://www.asahisokatsu.com/)
綜括的	46 (appears in academic research papers in the 1950s and 1960s)  
綜括的に	29	  
綜括する	26 (する = mostly dictionary entries) 
綜括的になり	26 (one single famous quote from 森鴎外・舞姫)
綜括的になりて	26 (one single famous quote from 森鴎外・舞姫)

27 google results are a *single* quote(can be found on twitter in this form!):
我学問は荒みぬ。されど余は別に一種の見識を長じき。～～。今まで一筋の道をのみ走りし知識は、自づから綜括的になりて、同郷の留学生などの大かたは、夢にも知らぬ境地に到りぬ。（森鴎外・舞姫）
or kotobank(abbreviated)
https://kotobank.jp/word/総括的-311651

For comparison, here is a term that was 17 times more commonly used. (0.35% vs. 0.02%).
そうごう: 0.35% 
総合	44074939
綜合	157254

Example, actual use:　University research paper, 1955, lot's of old kanji （ex. 之等 = かれら)
従って触媒を調整する場合には，之等の因子を単独に考える事は不適当で，五に開回する作用のあるものとして綜括的に考慮する必要がある．
https://eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2115/40563/1/12_127-138.pdf

Another: 1960, Relation between Volcanic Earthquakes and Tidal Phases
＊＊＊THIS DOESN'T ACTUALLY USE THE TERM.  It contains a reference to another article from 1958, titled "大島の地球物理学的研究の綜括，火山，2集， 3 (大島特集号) (1958)， 39-45
So, any academic text referencing this other paper will include the term as part of the reference. 
https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/kishou/books/kenshin/vol26p007.pdf

n-grams(paper title a):
研究の総括 1821
研究の綜括 No matches

A third academic paper 1968:
補助循環の研究に関する綜括的展望
https://webview.isho.jp/journal/detail/abs/10.11477/mf.1407204518?p=firstTab&englishFlg=2

A fourth:
Title: 	性格自己診断検査の作製
Other Titles: 	CONSTRUCTION OF NEW SELF DIAGNOSTIC INVENTORIES
Authors: 	矢田部, 達郎  KAKEN_name
Author's alias: 	YATABE, TATSURO
Issue Date: 	30-Mar-1954
Publisher: 	京都大學文學部
Journal title: 	京都大學文學部研究紀要
https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dspace/handle/2433/72858

An actual, modern use (2002 cookbook summary blurb).  I think that for mosts intents and purposes, this is a mistake.
内容詳細
本書は、これまでの食物アレルギーに関する知見を綜括することにより現状を把握し、これらをｂａｓｅとして将来の新たな発展のための幾つかの方向づけをすることにより、この領域における臨床と研究に寄与できればと考え、企画したものである。
https://www.hmv.co.jp/artist_中村晋_200000000531757/item_最新-食物アレルギー_3087305

Unfortunately:
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/総括/
出典：デジタル大辞泉（小学館）
そう‐かつ〔‐クワツ〕【総括／×綜括】 の解説

https://kotobank.jp/word/総括・綜括-2056346
精選版 日本国語大辞典「総括・綜括」の解説
そう‐かつ ‥クヮツ【総括・綜括】

If you want something crazy, there is an aozora use of 綜括, but it has furigana しめくくり。 (締めくくり　1. conclusion; end; finish; settlement;)
Is this... a translation of the Biblical Gospel of Mark?
https://www.aozora.gr.jp/cards/001538/files/60358_76776.html

Was going to lobby for [sK] over [rK](or [oK]?), even though it's in daijisen. The statistics speak for themselves, so I don't really mind if this is amended to [sK].  On bing, searching for "綜括" you have to go through 6 pages of dictionary entries, mixed with mentions of a very modern real estate agency (綜括不動産). Then the 1st hit is a pdf scan of a 1950s academic research paper. 

Was scouring twitter for the last bit of confirmation, and stumbled on the image of a book with "綜括編" on the spine. 『#東海の先史遺跡』綜括編（1963年）Looks serious enough, I guess this was at least somewhat legitimate at some time in the mid 1900s. 

https://twitter.com/ore_nest/status/1564519842426023939
https://twitter.com/ore_nest/status/1564519842426023939/photo/1

Although, google N-gram Corpus Counts
総括論	244
綜括編	No matches

Otherwise, there is one reasonably known quote with 綜括. And that seems to be about it. It's a nice-looking quote though(if I am to trust google translate, I honestly can't read this well enough to appreciate it).
我学問は荒みぬ。されど余は別に一種の見識を長じき。～～。今まで一筋の道をのみ走りし知識は、自づから綜括的になりて、同郷の留学生などの大かたは、夢にも知らぬ境地に到りぬ。（森鴎外・舞姫）

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

mk

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -26,0 +28 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog, daij

Revised glosses.
Added sense.
Added kanji.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>綜括</keb>
@@ -17,5 +20,8 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>synthesis</gloss>
-<gloss>recap</gloss>
-<gloss>generalize</gloss>
-<gloss>generalise</gloss>
+<gloss>summarization</gloss>
+<gloss>summary</gloss>
+<gloss>generalization</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>review (by labour or political movements of past activities, results, etc.)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ギャル文字#漢字
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyaru-moji

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬─────────╮
│ 禾ム │     254 │
│ 走召 │   4,353 │
│ ネ申 │ 187,033 │ - entry 2223620
╰─ーー─┴─────────╯

走召 gets a lot of hits on twitter. Maybe worth having as a search form?

@@ -6,0 +7,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>走召</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I think "pref" is safest. It's rather like めっちゃ, which could xref here.

Should sense 2 maybe be an adv rather than pref? Is there any difference in usage between 超 and めっちゃ？

daij, gg5

Added colloquial sense.
Fixed PoS tags.

@@ -17,2 +17 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<stagr>ちょう</stagr>
@@ -23,2 +22 @@
-<gloss>very</gloss>
-<gloss>really</gloss>
+<gloss>extreme</gloss>
@@ -27 +25,9 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&pref;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>extremely</gloss>
+<gloss>really</gloss>
+<gloss>totally</gloss>
+<gloss>absolutely</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>ちょう</stagr>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
蒟蒻	192380
菎蒻	203

https://www.kanjipedia.jp/kanji/0002439300
参考：「菎蒻」は「蒟蒻」の誤字。

デジタル大辞泉 索引トップ用語の索引ランキング凡例
デジタル大辞泉デジタル大辞泉
こん‐にゃく【×蒟×蒻／×菎×蒻】
https://www.weblio.jp/content/菎蒻

in daijisen

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

I didn't mean you should change it...

OK

@@ -20,2 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>konjac (Amorphophallus konjac)</gloss>
-<gloss>konnyaku</gloss>
+<gloss>konnyaku (Amorphophallus konjac)</gloss>
+<gloss>konjac</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>konnyaku jelly</gloss>
@@ -29 +30 @@
-<gloss>konnyaku jelly</gloss>
+<gloss>devil's tongue jelly</gloss>

To me it's always konnyaku and never konjac.

GG5: an acquaintance; a friend.
中辞典: (しりあい - acquaintance), (あんない - guidance, invitation), (てびき - guidance, introduction)
Daijr: 知り合い。縁のある人。
Daijs: 知っている人。知り合い。

Thre is overlap/confusion with the other しるべ entry (導； 標). We are keeping them separate.

@@ -12,9 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>guidance, directions (esp. in a geographical sense)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>one who gives guidance or directions</gloss>
-<gloss>guide</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>friend</gloss>

https://kobun.weblio.jp/content/知る辺#:~:text=しる－べ 【知る辺・導】&text=道の案内をする,道しるべ。

"Acquaintance" is a much less common meaning of this word

@@ -11,0 +12,9 @@
+<gloss>guidance, directions (esp. in a geographical sense)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>one who gives guidance or directions</gloss>
+<gloss>guide</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>friend</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬───╮
│ 形式的な性　　　　 │ 0 │
│ けいしきてきなせい │ 0 │
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴───╯

Indeed

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬─────╮
│ 好戦的な人　　　　 │ 679 │
│ こうせんてきなひと │   0 │
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴─────╯

A+B, no refs, obscure

Entry created

揉み苦茶 not in kokugos.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 揉みくちゃ │  6,949 │ 11.2% │
│ 揉み苦茶　 │     58 │  0.1% │ - rK (only gg5; probably ateji? [sK] might be appropriate)
│ もみくちゃ │ 55,161 │ 88.7% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

daij, gg5
G n-grams:
揉みくちゃ	6949
もみくちゃ	55161

Added sense.
Usually kana.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -15 +16,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -17,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>being mobbed</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +23,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>crumpling</gloss>
+</sense>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーーーーー─┬────╮
│ 持続的な有効性　　　　　 │ 20 │
│ じぞくてきなゆうこうせい │  0 │
╰─ーーーーーーーーーーーー─┴────╯

Entry created

Dupe.

相対的なパス名	26

相対的 and パス名 are both entries.

Entry created

相対的 and パス名 are both entries.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 相対パス　　　　　　　 │ 42,061 │ 99.9% │ - Looks like it's normally this
│ 相対的なパス名　　　　 │     26 │  0.1% │
│ そうたいてきなパスめい │      0 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーーーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

Entry created

I've been mulling this over for a while, and I've come round to Robin's position.

@@ -15,6 +14,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2026130">西語</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>Spanish (language)</gloss>

I think their use as abbreviations for languages is very limited. All that comes to mind is titles of dictionaries (e.g. 和仏辞典) and translations (e.g. "独: Wissenschaft"). Unless the name of the language differs significantly from the country name (e.g. 英 - United Kingdom/English), I don't think having a language sense adds much clarity.

I think adding language senses would make the entries clearer, as it might not be always obvious from context alone.

Most of these single-kanji abbreviations for countries can also represent the languages of those countries but only a couple of entries currently have a "... (language)" sense (or gloss).
Either we should add language senses to 日, 独, 伊, etc. or we should drop the language senses/glosses. My preference is the latter. It's almost always obvious from the context whether these abbreviations are referring to the country or the language. I note that the kokugos only mention the country.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1766800">西班牙</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1766800">西班牙・スペイン</xref>

Koj: "西班牙スペインの略。「米西戦争」"

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1766800">西班牙</xref>
@@ -14 +15,6 @@
-<gloss>Spanish language</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2026130">西語</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>Spanish (language)</gloss>

Hiding the 無し form.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

No problem.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>when you would be a filial child, your parents are already gone</gloss>
+<gloss>when you are ready to be a filial child, your parents are already gone</gloss>

If you're willing to drop the "want/wish" of したい, what do you think of:
  when you're ready to be a filial child, your parents are already gone

GG5: 孝行のしたい時分に親はなし． When one would be filial, one's parents are gone． ｜ A son is always too late to think of his parents.

I feel the second gloss is overdoing it a bit. Trimming.

@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<gloss>when you want to become a filial child, your parents are already gone</gloss>
-<gloss>when you finally appreciate what your parents have done for you, it's too late to repay them</gloss>
+<gloss>when you would be a filial child, your parents are already gone</gloss>

孝行のしたい時分に親はなし
https://imidas.jp/proverb/detail/X-02-C-10-1-0018.html#:~:text=こうこうのしたいじ,はいないことをいう。
親の苦労がやっと分かって、これからは親孝行をしなければと考えるころには、すでに親は死んでこの世にはいないことをいう。

Just made an edit to 風樹の嘆, and pointed it at this entry.

"when you will wish" was not grammatical, which prompted me to edit to, something....  

Gloss #1 aims to be literal. I don't think that "want to be filial" in isolation makes a lot of sense in English.  I have a similar reluctance toward "I want to show filial piety", I feel like an indirect object is needed.  Another possible literal gloss:

  when you want to show filial piety to your parents, they're already gone; 


For the second gloss, I've taken the imidas explanation(when you understand the hardships of your parents...) and tried to arrive at something more relatable/analogous to Western experience (since we don't really do filial piety here...).  "It's too late to repay" tries to capture "you want to repay", which is the 孝行のしたい bit. It's ends up being ambiguous about the parents being dead-dead, but technically I think the original is as well?  "It's too late to thank them" seems less ambiguous about them being dead, but "thank" could be a one-off gesture, and not a change in behavior (which repayment would require). 

Well, best I could come up with.  I won't take it personally if the gloss isn't kept.

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>when you will wish to be filial, your parents will already be gone</gloss>
+<gloss>when you want to become a filial child, your parents are already gone</gloss>
+<gloss>when you finally appreciate what your parents have done for you, it's too late to repay them</gloss>

The issue is now live so I think this can be closed.

Reopen.

I had started a response to this thread, not noticing this one from Robin (the order being changed.) I think the suggested approach is sound. I'm keen to get the more common nakaguro versions searchable.
I'll approve this and reopen it.

I'm planning to raise an issue about this on GitHub. I'm going to suggest that we copy GG5's approach and have only a single visible reading – *with* nakaguro – for all non-[uk] acronyms. The nakaguro-less forms would be search-only (as would readings that contain variant pronunciations of letters). I've made an edit to show what this would look like on this entry.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<reb>ジェイアール</reb>
+<reb>ジェイ・アール</reb>
@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<reb>ジェイ・アール</reb>
+<reb>ジェイアール</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -17,4 +18 @@
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ジェー・アール</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Maybe. A JMdictDB search for readings containing the character "・" pulls up a lot of them, though.
１Ｒ；ＡＶ；Ｇ７；ＪＣ；ＪＳ；ＬＨＲ；ＯＤＰ, etc.

Obvious; as is usual for ...的な... expressions.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ 技術的な課題　　　　 │ 8,143 │
│ ぎじゅつてきなかだい │     0 │
╰─ーーーーーーーーーー─┴───────╯

Entry created

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>streamer fly (fishing)</gloss>
+<field>&fish;</field>
+<gloss>streamer fly</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ストリーマー・フライ</reb>

Daijr

I was puzzled.

@@ -9,1 +9,1 @@
-<gloss>streamer fly</gloss>
+<gloss>streamer fly (fishing)</gloss>

Entry created

We have 風木 tagged as rare. No need for the x-ref.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2582660">風木</xref>

Aligning.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>thinking about one's deceased parents (particularly about having failed in one's filial duties while they were alive)</gloss>
+<gloss>regret for not appreciating one's parents when they were alive</gloss>

デジタル大辞泉「風樹」の解説
ふう‐じゅ【風樹】
１ 風に吹かれて揺れている木。風木。
２ 「風樹の嘆」に同じ。
「眺めて居ると―の思いに堪え難いから」〈梅崎・贋の季節〉

《「韓詩外伝」九から》静止していたいのに、風に吹かれて揺れ動かざるをえない樹木のように、子供が孝行をしたいと思うときには、すでに親が死んでいてどうすることもできないという嘆き。風樹の悲しみ。風木の嘆。風木の悲しみ。


https://kotobank.jp/word/風樹-615836#:~:text=ふう‐じゅ【風樹】&text=① 風に吹かれる,風木。&text=② (%E3%80%8C%E9%9F%93%E8%A9%A9%E5%A4%96%E4%BC%9D%E2%80%90,%E6%80%9D%E3%81%86%E6%B0%97%E6%8C%81%E3%82%92%E3%81%84%E3%81%86%E8%AA%9E%E3%80%82

精選版 日本国語大辞典「風樹」の解説
 すでに死んでしまった親を思う気持をいう語。風木。

The entire definition in daijisen is ２ 「風樹の嘆」に同じ。

This is not consistent across all dictionaries, so I went with the "particularly" option.

But, given the daijisen entry, I think the derivation is probably from 風樹の嘆 backwards to 風樹, rather than the other way around (as it appears before this edit). I think the swaying trees are tied up in some sense of melancholy or regret.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>thinking about one's deceased parents</gloss>
+<gloss>thinking about one's deceased parents (particularly about having failed in one's filial duties while they were alive)</gloss>

not a verb

@@ -17,2 +17,4 @@
-<xref type="see">風樹の嘆</xref>
-<gloss>to think about one's deceased parents</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2582680">風樹の嘆</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2582680">風樹の嘆</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>thinking about one's deceased parents</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

GG5: regret for one's unkindness to one's parents when they were alive.

Maybe this is clear enough. I don't think that xref helps.

@@ -12,3 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2417390">孝行のしたい時分に親はなし・こうこうのしたいじぶんにおやはなし</xref>
-<gloss>regret of not fulfilling one's filial duties to one's parents when they were still alive</gloss>
-<gloss>regret of not properly appreciating one's parents when they were still alive</gloss>
+<gloss>regret for not appreciating one's parents when they were alive</gloss>

n-grams
風樹の嘆	226
時分に親はなし 337　(fragment of suggested see=kotowaza, which is otherwise too long to match the n-gram database)

Whole little writeup on just this expression, Nov. 2022
https://japanese-note.jp/fuujyu-no-tan/
「やりたくても親孝行ができない」とか「親孝行にはも遅い」ということです

風樹の嘆
https://kotobank.jp/word/風樹の嘆-615839
故事成語を知る辞典: 親孝行をしたいと思うときには、親はすでに亡くなっているという嘆き。

This entry is for my benefit, since *I* don't understand what "filial" really means...

https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-981-287-080-3_45-1#:~:text=Definition,and meet a parent's needs.
Filial obligation is the obligation of children to defer to parental wishes and meet a parent’s needs. This role not only includes contact with parents, having shared living arrangements, and providing routine care, but also involves providing physical, informational, and emotional support and financial help, especially when parents reach old age. This responsibility also includes more comprehensive efforts to ensure a parent’s safety, health, emotional well-being, sociability, and continued integration in society through contact with the outside world (Schorr 1960; Caro 2014; Whyte 2004).

Article seems to match Rene's comments from back in 2010.

Suggested [see=] is a slightly more popular-looking kotowaza listed as a related-expression in the reference article. In particular, the linked expression is more literal, and might provide some insight on the thought-process behind this expression.

I *never* know what dictionary term glossed with "filial" really means, since "filial piety" and  "filial responsibility" (at least in my experience) are not so ingrained in western culture.  So, I've gone ahead and tried for a more relatable gloss as well, but feel free to edit/drop it.  For me "properly appreciating", in the western sense, would include things like "visiting, keeping in touch with, making sure they were well cared for", etc. "Doing what you were supposed to do when they were alive, and now they're gone".  I think that's the right idea...  

If the second gloss is kept, I think there is a meaningful gap between "appreciating" and "properly appreciating", with the latter encompassing the thought "I may have done some things, but I should have done more". 

Like Rene, I think, it's probably less about "active" mistreatment, and more about passive neglect.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>regretting one's unkindness to one's deceased parents when they were alive</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2417390">孝行のしたい時分に親はなし・こうこうのしたいじぶんにおやはなし</xref>
+<gloss>regret of not fulfilling one's filial duties to one's parents when they were still alive</gloss>
+<gloss>regret of not properly appreciating one's parents when they were still alive</gloss>

koj, daijr, daijs, meikyo have a different reading

i don't think it's about "unkindness" so much as failing to fulfil one's filial duties

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>ふうじゅのなげし</reb>
+<reb>ふうじゅのたん</reb>
@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>to regret one's unkindness to one's deceased parents when they were alive</gloss>
+<gloss>regretting one's unkindness to one's deceased parents when they were alive</gloss>

Probably better to lead with this gloss.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>Pancake Day</gloss>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>pancake day</gloss>

We called it "pancake day" when I was a kid.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>pancake day</gloss>

wiki

worshiping 170381
worshipping 521052

I'll take a middle path.
Even AmE tends to double the "p".

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>two bows, two claps, and a third bow (form of worshiping at a shrine)</gloss>
+<gloss>two bows, two claps, and a third bow (common form of worshipping at a shrine)</gloss>

To be clear, I think any of these would be an improvement:

(a standard form of worshiping at a shrine)   # (maybe my favorite, even with the article, but we don't like articles)

(the standard form of worshiping at a shrine) # (opinionated, but probably accurate.  I think this is objectively the standard form of worshiping at a Shinto Shrine in Japan

(common form of worshiping at a shrine)       # True enough

(form of worshiping at a shrine)              # Safe but inoffensive, loses some information

Don't really need a reference for this, but I can say the wikipedia page includes the note:
なお、拝礼の作法は神社や地域によって特色があり、厳格な決まりはない[4]。 (no rules, worship etiquette may vary by shrine and region)

二礼二拍手一礼
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/二礼二拍手一礼

Another historical, less common pattern is, for example:
三礼三拍手一礼

I invite comments/changes to this edit.  Sorry if this seems overly trivial, I'm making this post as a not-overly-sensitive person :)

I had replaced "standard" with "common", but ended up convincing myself to remove that as well.

My question/emotional reaction when reading this definition is "*a* standard form of worship" or "*the* standard form of worship".

Oddly, I wouldn't mind either one personally, but I don't like the feeling of trying to "guess" what the dictionary is saying.  The problem is that this practice is, so far as I can tell from personal experience and google, objectively "the standard", with the proviso that there are still other ways to do this at different shrines and different regions (different numbers of claps, different numbers of bows).  If we mean "the standard", I think "the" should be added unambiguously, even though policy shies away from articles.  If we don't want to make such a committal assertion, we could say "a standard".

Or, if we don't want an article, and don't want to take a firm stance on Japanese religious practices, "common" seems easily fair enough given the prevalence of this ritual in Japanese society.

Or, we could just say "(form of worshiping at a shrine)", the only loss being that it really is super-common, and we're no longer communicating that.

I've searched pretty much every gloss with "standard" in it, and this issue really is limited to just this, and one related entry (or I would have gone the github route).

If a change is made/accepted here, the identical change should be made to the entry 二拝二拍一拝.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>two bows, two claps, and a third bow (standard form of worshiping at a shrine)</gloss>
+<gloss>two bows, two claps, and a third bow (form of worshiping at a shrine)</gloss>

g ng
二礼二拍手一礼	4847
二礼二拍一礼	1404
二礼二拍手一拝	292
二礼二拍一拝	35
https://www.xn--t8j4c7dy42mj9kt8e4tsjg7cfa.net/nireinihakuichirei/
”参拝で行うこの作法のことを「二礼二拍手一礼」といいます。"

Reconciling gloss with change in 二礼二拍手一礼.
(apologies, my comment on 二礼二拍手一礼 had the wrong kanji for this entry).

Was wondering if this is an [abbr], but that seems like a bad idea given that there are also 3 or 4 other variations of this phrase that are commonly used, and this is probably still the second-most common form overall.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>two bows, two claps, and a third bow (standard form of worshiping at a shrine)</gloss>
+<gloss>two bows, two claps, and a third bow (common form of worshipping at a shrine)</gloss>

g ng
二礼二拍手一礼	4847
二礼二拍一礼	1404
二礼二拍手一拝	292
二礼二拍一拝	35
https://www.xn--t8j4c7dy42mj9kt8e4tsjg7cfa.net/nireinihakuichirei/
”二礼二拍一礼は参拝の基本。その歴史と考え方とは。"

Aligning.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

wadoku
gloss, PoS copied from ちょっぴり
6 tweets past 24 hrs
ちょっぴし	14988
チョッピシ	916
ちょっぴり	2686985
チョッピリ	90291
https://seikou38.com/uwajima/宇和島の方言「ちょっ�%
B4%E3%81%97%E3%80%8D/
"宇和島の方言で「ちょっぴし」は、「少し」を意味します。"
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1423559494
「ちょっぴり」の訛りではないでしょうか。
非常にわずかなさまの意味です。
新語ではありません。
「り」が「し」に変わる例が幾つかあります。
「ばっちし」、「やっぱし」などです。

Yes.

Seems to be a dupe of 2852155

gg5
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_header/?id=883&vm=&re=

中辞典 has 鰾膠/にべ as the fish.

gg5, daij

GG5 and daijr/s have a second sense.
Given that there's no kanji overlap in most of the refs, I think it's best to keep the entries separate.

@@ -26,0 +27,10 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1571050">にべもない</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu. as 〜もない or 〜もなく</s_inf>
+<gloss>amiability</gloss>
+<gloss>friendliness</gloss>
+<gloss>graciousness</gloss>
+<gloss>flattery</gloss>
+</sense>

GG5: ニベ  〔ニベから得るにかわ〕 isinglass; fish glue.

GG5 and several EJs have this as kana-only.  We currently have 鮸/にべ as an entry for the croaker fish, and 中辞典 has the 鰾膠 for that entry too.
Given the kanji form and reading overlap, this probably needs to be merged with 2191590. All rather messy.

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -23,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>isinglass</gloss>

鰾膠 and 鮸膠 are in meikyo, obunsha, daijs, etc. with this meaning.

Shinmeikai has this meaning for 鮸, as well as a sense for the fish specifically (our entry 2191590)

I only see 膠 with this reading in jitsuyou in the expression 膠も無い

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬─────────╮
│ 鰾膠 │     183 │
│ 鮸膠 │       0 │
│ 鮸　 │       0 │
│ 膠　 │ 240,033 │
╰─ーー─┴─────────╯

同線	35708
同家	12740
同格	72758
同級	105152
同月	441614
同権	22378
同校	247394
同県	230541

We have heaps of these as entries; some are less common than this one. I think this one won't hurt.

I'm not sure this is needed. It's just 同+線. It looks like a single word because it's only two characters but it's no different from something like 同条件.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>said line</gloss>
-<gloss>same line</gloss>
+<gloss>the said line</gloss>
+<gloss>the same line</gloss>

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/同線
https://www.brasilnippou.com/2023/230216-15brasil.html

同線	35708

Looks good.

daijs, meikyo

It's a long gloss but I think it's helpful to be specific here.
The kokugos have a second sense.

@@ -7,0 +8 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -10 +11,2 @@
-<gloss>thickly (e.g. whipped eggs or cream)</gloss>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>thickly (of whipped eggs, cream, etc.; such that it leaves a trail or forms soft peaks)</gloss>
@@ -12 +14,10 @@
-<gloss>softly (e.g. foam from soap)</gloss>
+<gloss>becoming thick and foamy (of soap suds)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>sluggishly</gloss>
+<gloss>slowly</gloss>
+<gloss>heavily</gloss>

GG5: 
卵の白身を掻き立て, もったりしてきたら砂糖を加えてさらに少し掻き立てます. Beat the egg whites until 「thick (and foamy) [soft peaks form], add the sugar, and beat a little more.
この石けんの泡はもったりと柔らかい. This soap forms thick soft suds.
Unidic
https://www.lotte.co.jp/products/brand/ghana/technique/make3.html   (5th section)
もったり	95277
もったりと	12359
もったりする	10666
もったりして	10293

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>もったり</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -11,2 +8,5 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>???</gloss>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>thickly (e.g. whipped eggs or cream)</gloss>
+<gloss>stickily</gloss>
+<gloss>softly (e.g. foam from soap)</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/もったり-645885

反乱	459613
鎮圧	162133

Yes, it's rather obvious and not that common compared with the parts.
OTOH I put the three glosses into GT and it returned this expression for two of them.

I don't think it's needed. In previous years, all sorts of expressions were added to JMdict but we tend not to accept collocations like this any more. It's A+B (a sum of parts).

I appreciate all the time reviewing my comments.

My two cents, since I guess I started this... 
Since 反乱を抑える and 反乱を鎮める actually were approved for deletion(which was my larger motivation, because I actually found them to be misleading), I think it would be completely consistent to *not* create this entry. (Consistent with Robin's remarks on 反乱を鎮める).

On the other hand, this is a very nice collocation now (and there are lots of collocations in this dictionary, whatever the actual editorial policy might be). If I searched for either 反乱 or 鎮圧, I think this entry would be particularly elucidating to see, and I would probably build a flashcard off of it. (As we've seen, there are a lot of terms for "suppress" to chose from in Japanese, for example). 

Beyond that, I don't think I have a definitive view on whether this should or shouldn't actually be here.  Not that it was my call anyway :) But I won't be bothered with whatever everyone else decides.

反乱を鎮圧する	1191
反乱を鎮圧した	1020
反乱を鎮圧して	329
Eijiro:
左翼の反乱を鎮圧する : put down a leftist insurgency
大きな反乱を鎮圧する〔～の〕 : suppress the great rebellion of
反乱を鎮圧する : crush a rising
GG5: クラッスス - .. 70 BC にスパルタクスの反乱を鎮圧)
3 Tanaka sentences

反乱 （はんらん） (n,vs,vi) insurrection; mutiny; rebellion; revolt; uprising
鎮圧 （ちんあつ） (n,vs,vt) suppression; subjugation
Possibly a bit obvious.

https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Which_Reference_Is_Best?
Unidic only has 英彦 for the names ひでひこ and ひこ.

I've added a few words to the policy. I agree that Nikkoku alone is not a great case.

I suspect that almost all those n-grams are names. Nikk is the only kokugo that has this. I don't think it's needed.
If a word is in none of the usual refs besides nikkoku, it's usually archaic or obsolete. A submission that cites nikk should ideally be supported by other references or evidence of non-archaic use.
Jim, could we add a note about nikk to the editorial policy?

https://kotobank.jp/word/英彦-2012785

英彦	69957
Also a given name.

See comments on 週足.

@@ -12,9 +12,2 @@
-<field>&bus;</field>
-<gloss>monthly share price movement</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2857466">月足チャート・つきあしチャート</xref>
-<field>&bus;</field>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>monthly candlestick chart</gloss>
+<field>&finc;</field>
+<gloss>monthly candlestick</gloss>

GG5: 月足チャート : 	【証券】 a monthly candlestick chart.
月足	62305	  
月足チャート	25293	 
月足らず	4793 <- entry

I think 月足 means something like "monthly share price movement", and hence GG5's 月足 + チャート but it seems that often it's used as the name of the chart of such movements.  Not sure if a sense split is appropriate.

@@ -11,0 +12,8 @@
+<field>&bus;</field>
+<gloss>monthly share price movement</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2857466">月足チャート・つきあしチャート</xref>
+<field>&bus;</field>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

https://kotobank.jp/word/月足-570966

Eijiro

副+党首, but probably worth having.

https://www.brasilnippou.com/2023/230218-13brasil.html

副党首	4602

いい人止まり	976	38.3%
良い人止まり	349	13.7%
イイ人止まり	85	3.3%
良い人どまり	74	2.9%
イイ人どまり	52	2.0%
いい人どまり	1012	39.7%

Left one out.
They can help text searches. Thanks for noticing いいひととどまり - I meant to fix it and overlooked it.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>いい人どまり</keb>
+</k_ele>

Is there any point in sk's which only are katakana versions of other readings?

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<reb>いいひととどまり</reb>
+<reb>いいひとどまり</reb>

OK

http://www.practical-japanese.com/2014/05/blog-post_4115.html?q=いい人止まり
単なる「いい人」として見られるだけにとどまり、異性としての魅力を感じられるに至らないさまを表す語。
https://onet.co.jp/marriage_column/4009.html
https://pcmax.jp/column/love/m/712/

I think they're more or less equivalent.

@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -29 +28,2 @@
-<gloss>nice person of the opposite sex (but not an object of love)</gloss>
+<gloss>being friend-zoned</gloss>
+<gloss>being regarded by someone as a nice person but not as a potential romantic partner</gloss>

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/friendzone
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friend_zone

I can't claim expertise with "friendzoning", but the meanings don't seem to align with the Japanese explanations. Please provide references to support such an edit.

@@ -29 +29 @@
-<gloss>frendzoning</gloss>
+<gloss>nice person of the opposite sex (but not an object of love)</gloss>

I think one gloss is sufficient.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<field>&bus;</field>
-<gloss>monthly share price movement chart</gloss>
+<field>&finc;</field>

GG5
月足チャート	25293

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>いっぱきょうしょえんぜつ</reb>
+<reb>いっぱんきょうしょえんぜつ</reb>

GG5.

OK

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>教書演説</keb>
+<keb>一般教書演説</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>きょうしょえんぜつ</reb>
+<reb>いっぱきょうしょえんぜつ</reb>
@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>speech by a leader</gloss>
-<gloss>presidential address</gloss>
+<gloss>State of the Union address (US)</gloss>

教書演説	        14,155		
一般教書演説	12,490
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/一般教書演説

I don't think this is needed. We could change it to 一般教書演説, which is in GG5.

Depends on the context. Let's close it.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>presidential speech</gloss>
+<gloss>speech by a leader</gloss>
+<gloss>presidential address</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/gs/?q=教書演説
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/pickup/6454681

教書演説	14155
Might not be exclusive to presidents.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/坂崎幸之助

Not a female name.

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<misc>&fem;</misc>
-<gloss>Kounosuke</gloss>
+<misc>&male;</misc>
+<gloss>Kōnosuke</gloss>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
-<gloss>Mutsumaru (name of ship)</gloss>
+<misc>&ship;</misc>
+<gloss>Mutsumaru</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Matsumaru (name of ship)</gloss>
+<gloss>Mutsumaru (name of ship)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/相羽装子

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/伊藤盡

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/小田都由

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/加藤充明

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/君嶋麻耶

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/楠部三吉郎

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/佐野伶莉

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/塩山瑛大

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/杉森此馬

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/菅田琳寧

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/高橋真登

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/増澤璃凜子

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/皆川正禧