I've seen several establishments (two cafes, a burger place) that advertise themselves as for ライダー  meaning bikers. That connotation seems esp. strong soI think "biker" needs to b a gloss.

@@ -10 +10,2 @@
-<gloss>rider</gloss>
+<gloss>rider (of a motorcycle, horse, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>biker</gloss>

Looks good.

gg5, prog, wisdom, daij, meikyo

Or we could move them to usage notes as neither form is especially common. Daijr/s and meikyo only have 押す as a headword.
Reworked the glosses.
The last two senses are archaic. I don't think they're needed.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15 +16 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24 +24,0 @@
-<stagk>押す</stagk>
@@ -28 +28,2 @@
-<gloss>to press</gloss>
+<gloss>to thrust</gloss>
+<gloss>to shove</gloss>
@@ -31,2 +31,0 @@
-<stagk>押す</stagk>
-<stagk>圧す</stagk>
@@ -35,2 +34,4 @@
-<gloss>to apply pressure from above</gloss>
-<gloss>to press down</gloss>
+<s_inf>also written as 圧す</s_inf>
+<gloss>to press (down)</gloss>
+<gloss>to push (e.g. a button)</gloss>
+<gloss>to exert pressure on</gloss>
@@ -39,2 +39,0 @@
-<stagk>押す</stagk>
-<stagk>捺す</stagk>
@@ -43,3 +42,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1903080">判を押す</xref>
-<gloss>to stamp (i.e. a passport)</gloss>
-<gloss>to apply a seal</gloss>
+<s_inf>also written as 捺す</s_inf>
+<gloss>to stamp (e.g. one's name)</gloss>
+<gloss>to affix (a seal)</gloss>
@@ -48 +46,0 @@
-<stagk>押す</stagk>
@@ -54 +51,0 @@
-<stagk>押す</stagk>
@@ -57,4 +54,3 @@
-<gloss>to press (someone for something)</gloss>
-<gloss>to urge</gloss>
-<gloss>to compel</gloss>
-<gloss>to influence</gloss>
+<gloss>to push (someone for something)</gloss>
+<gloss>to press</gloss>
+<gloss>to put pressure on (someone)</gloss>
@@ -63,2 +58,0 @@
-<stagk>押す</stagk>
-<stagk>圧す</stagk>
@@ -66,0 +61 @@
+<s_inf>usu. in the passive; also written as 圧す</s_inf>
@@ -69 +64,2 @@
-<gloss>to repress</gloss>
+<gloss>to put (someone) under pressure</gloss>
+<gloss>to be superior to</gloss>
@@ -72 +68,7 @@
-<stagk>押す</stagk>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to push ahead (with a policy, plan, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to proceed</gloss>
+<gloss>to stick to</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -75,2 +77,5 @@
-<gloss>to push (events along)</gloss>
-<gloss>to advance (a plan)</gloss>
+<s_inf>as ...を押して...</s_inf>
+<gloss>to do ... in spite of ...</gloss>
+<gloss>to defy</gloss>
+<gloss>to brave</gloss>
+<gloss>to push aside</gloss>
@@ -79 +83,0 @@
-<stagk>押す</stagk>
@@ -82,10 +86 @@
-<gloss>to do in spite of ...</gloss>
-<gloss>to do even though ...</gloss>
-<gloss>to force</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagk>押す</stagk>
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1900890">念を押す・ねんをおす</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1892630">駄目を押す・だめをおす</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1900890">念を押す</xref>
@@ -95 +89,0 @@
-<stagk>押す</stagk>
@@ -97,15 +91,2 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>to be pressed for time</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagk>押す</stagk>
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>to advance troops</gloss>
-<gloss>to attack</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagk>押す</stagk>
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>(of light) to be diffused across an entire surface</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to fall behind schedule</gloss>

I think splitting 圧す and 捺す off is not a bad idea. Before setting it up I thought I'd see if there was support for that.

shouldn't this be split into 押す, 圧す and 捺す?

圧し掛かる is a different usage.
The JEs don't mention 圧す but I don't mind if the [rK] is dropped.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Looks good.

手を捕まえ	1,358	66.7%	
手を捉まえ	0	0.0%	
手を掴まえ	158	7.8%	
手をつかまえ	520	25.5%
---
首根っこを捕まえ	1,519	66.2%	
首根っこを掴まえ	164	7.2%	
首根っこを捉まえ	0	0.0%	
首根っこをつかまえ	610	26.6%

According to meikyo, 捕まえる can be used for sense 2. The n-grams support this. smk has 掴まえる for all senses. Happy to drop the restrictions.
I don't think 掴まえる should be rK. In certain contexts it's not so rare relative to other forms.

@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<keb>捉まえる</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>掴まえる</keb>
@@ -15 +14 @@
-<keb>掴まえる</keb>
+<keb>捉まえる</keb>
@@ -25 +23,0 @@
-<stagk>捕まえる</stagk>
@@ -35,2 +32,0 @@
-<stagk>捉まえる</stagk>
-<stagk>掴まえる</stagk>

捕まえる	296124	78.0%
捉まえる	2047	0.5%
掴まえる	5770	1.5%
つかまえる	75769	20.0%

I'm wondering about the restrictions. I know they are in the kokugos, but considering how rare those forms are I suspect they are historical now. The current restrictions on sense 2 mean the 2/3 rule indicates the entry should be split. GG5 and ルミナス use kana for examples for all senses.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -58 +58 @@
-<gloss>in (someone's face)</gloss>
+<gloss>in (someone's) face</gloss>

gg5, luminous, daij

@@ -28,2 +28,3 @@
-<gloss>to hold down</gloss>
-<gloss>to twist someone's arm</gloss>
+<gloss>to twist someone's arm and throw them to the ground</gloss>
+<gloss>to hold (someone) down by twisting their arm</gloss>
+<gloss>to wrestle (someone) to the floor</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 捻じ伏せる │  2,247 │  7.5% │
│ ねじ伏せる │ 24,021 │ 80.6% │
│ 捩じ伏せる │    657 │  2.2% │
│ 捻伏せる　 │      0 │  0.0% │
│ 捩伏せる　 │     89 │  0.3% │
│ ねじふせる │  2,772 │  9.3% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ねじ伏せる</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11,2 @@
-<keb>ねじ伏せる</keb>
+<keb>捩じ伏せる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11 +15,2 @@
-<keb>捩じ伏せる</keb>
+<keb>捩伏せる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,3 +20 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>捩伏せる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>childcare worker (female)</gloss>
+<gloss>(female) childcare worker</gloss>

OK, so once again the JEs are reflecting recent usage better than the kokugos.

@@ -22,2 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>childcare worker</gloss>
-<gloss>children's nurse</gloss>
+<gloss>childcare worker (female)</gloss>
+<gloss>kindergarten teacher</gloss>

Regardless of what's decided, we probably should mention that this term explicitly refers to female carers (in contrast to 保父)

native informer says "保育園の先生". which doesn't trump the kokugos, but gives a hint about how it's actually used. I don't think children's nurse is right, and that the teacher gloss should go back in, even if it doesn't align eiththe kokugos.

GG5: a (children's, dry) nurse; a nursery governess.
中辞典: 〈保育園の〉 a nurse; 〈幼稚園の〉 a kindergarten teacher.
Koj: 保育所・児童養護施設などの児童福祉施設で、児童の保育に従事する女性職員。
Daijr: 保育所・養護施設など児童福祉施設で，児童の保育に従事する女子職員。所定の保母養成学校の卒業者，あるいは都道府県知事が行う保母試験に合格した者がなる。

"kindergarten teacher" seems a bit off the mark.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>kindergarten teacher</gloss>
+<gloss>children's nurse</gloss>

OK. I'm comfortable with dropping it in the absence of clear evidence.

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>a bit more</gloss>

gg5: うーん, もう一工夫ほしいところだよ.　Come on; use your heads a bit more [let's have a bit more ingenuity].

Are you referring to the example above? The "bit more" in that sentence comes from もう. 
Unless we can find a more solid reference, I think that gloss should be dropped.

I'll drop that as a sense and restore it in sense 1. GG5 has it in an example.

@@ -24,5 +24 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<gloss>bit more (e.g. food)</gloss>
+<gloss>a bit more</gloss>

I don't think sense 2 is clear. I'd add more detail but I'm not familiar with this usage and I can't find any examples.

We only have Nils' observation. May as well stay.

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

〈見／み〉〈向（き）／むき〉もし〈無／な〉い

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 見向きもしない │ 77,826 │ 99.3% │
│ 見むきもしない │    253 │  0.3% │ - add, sk
│ 見向きもし無い │     50 │  0.1% │
│ 見向もしない　 │     20 │  0.0% │
│ みむきもしない │    256 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>見むきもしない</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog, wisdom

@@ -13,3 +13,4 @@
-<gloss>taking no notice</gloss>
-<gloss>ignoring</gloss>
-<gloss>not even looking at</gloss>
+<gloss>taking no notice (of)</gloss>
+<gloss>showing no interest (in)</gloss>
+<gloss>paying no attention (to)</gloss>
+<gloss>ignoring completely</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=見向きもしない

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>not even looking at</gloss>

Koj, Daijr, etc.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>

Entry created

shinmeikai: 男性の「保育士」の旧称。
sankoku:    男性の保育士の、もとの呼び名。

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&dated;</misc>

gg5, daijr

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>male carer (esp. in a nursery school)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2685030">保育士</xref>
+<gloss>male carer (at a nursery school, children's home, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>childcare worker</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>male carer, esp. in a nursery school</gloss>
+<gloss>male carer (esp. in a nursery school)</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>

Entry created

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<s_inf>from いや+だ</s_inf>
+<s_inf>from いや + だ</s_inf>

On reflection, I'd leave it as it is.

Sense 3 seems to be arch. If we want to keep it, it should be split out I think, but it doesn't seem worth keeping.

We couls add いやだ and the kanji form 嫌だ here (as in the やや entry). It was previously a separate entry but deleted.

@@ -29,7 +28,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>やだ</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>fault</gloss>
-<gloss>defect</gloss>
-<gloss>weak point</gloss>

I've looked at this a few times, and I guess there's a slight difference between the first two senses.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<s_inf>from いや+だ</s_inf>

how is this different than sense 1?

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2037380">いやだ</xref>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/全身リップ
全身リップ、性風俗店において相手の身体を舐める性行為のことである。

I think this detail is important.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>full-body kissing and licking</gloss>
+<gloss>full-body kissing and licking (sexual service)</gloss>

Been hanging too long. I guess it scrapes in.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>kissing and licking of the erogenous zones</gloss>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>

https://cocoa-job.jp/column/6535/

https://fuzoku.jp/magazine/30358/

https://momojob.net/wordbook/detail/152/

https://www.30baito.net/blog/11003

The デジタル大辞泉 entry for リップ only has senses for "lips" and as an abbreviation. https://kotobank.jp/word/リップ-658054

No refs in the wiki article. Even if valid and common, having another sense in our リップ entry would probably be enough.

Not especially common.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

obunsha, daijs

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ ぶちのめす │  7,018 │ 35.3% │
│ 打ちのめす │ 11,414 │ 57.4% │
│ 打のめす　 │      0 │  0.0% │
│ ブチのめす │  1,457 │  7.3% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>打のめす</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +14,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ブチのめす</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -14,0 +23 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -23,0 +33 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

prog, meikyo, koj

Has the same senses as うちのめす.

@@ -19,0 +20,11 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to deal a devastating blow (from which one cannot recover)</gloss>
+<gloss>to devastate (emotionally)</gloss>
+<gloss>to crush</gloss>
+<gloss>to overwhelm</gloss>
+<gloss>to defeat resoundingly</gloss>
+<gloss>to give (an opponent) a drubbing</gloss>
+</sense>

As it's rare, I think one visible form is enough.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>かまどを起こす</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -11 +8 @@
-<keb>カマドを起こす</keb>
+<keb>竃を起こす</keb>
@@ -15 +12 @@
-<keb>竃を起こす</keb>
+<keb>かまどを起こす</keb>
@@ -34 +31 @@
-<gloss>to become head of a family</gloss>
+<gloss>to become the head of a family</gloss>

OK. Not sure it's another sense.

@@ -28,0 +29,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>to become head of a family</gloss>
+</sense>

sankoku: 独立して、一家のあるじとなる。
shinkoku: 独立して一家の主人となる。
daijr: 独立して一家の主人となる。

GG5: 竃を起こす increase the family 「fortune [assets]
Daijs: 家を繁栄させる。身代を築く。
0 n-grams for all forms.

I'm only seeing one sense. Odd that it's several references as it's quite uncommon.

@@ -25,6 +25 @@
-<gloss>to become head of a branch family</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
-<misc>&id;</misc>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
@@ -33 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>to increase family honor</gloss>

sankoku, daijr/s, senkoku, gg5, smk

I agree. While ばーと gets reasonable n-gram counts, they are almost all false positives. Actual usage is all over the place.

I feel it's safer to not have this as an entry then to give erroneous or very incomplete information

I don't think these glosses are quite it. I'm not sure it's a word in that sense, I'm not sure the meaning is really defined, that it can be used to mean almost anything.

Maybe this.

@@ -16 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>with an energetic voice</gloss>
+<gloss>emphatically (speaking)</gloss>
+<gloss>energetically</gloss>
+<gloss>vigorously</gloss>

https://ja.hinative.com/questions/16468154
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1447267019

I think there are more meanings, but this is what I was able to verify.

This is our usual style. It's easier to read.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>to crush with one's fingers (insect, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to crush with one's fingers (an insect, etc.)</gloss>

koj

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

中辞典

I think one sense is enough.

@@ -15,5 +15 @@
-<gloss>to crush (an insect, etc.)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
-<gloss>to kill readily</gloss>
+<gloss>to crush with one's fingers (insect, etc.)</gloss>

daijr/s, nikk, koj, gg5

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────┬───────╮
│ 捻り殺す　　 │  70 │ 20.6% │
│ 捻り殺して　 │  64 │ 18.8% │
│ ひねり殺す　 │  90 │ 26.5% │
│ ひねり殺して │ 116 │ 34.1% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────┴───────╯

I agree.

I don't think this is needed now that ジッポ has been approved.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────╮
│ ジッポライター │ 12,801 │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────╯

very popular in japan, the brand name has become pretty much become synonymous with this type of lighter

i'm not american so i don't know how popular it is there but i personally never heard of it

Obviously if a term is used in a book or paper related to the period when it was in more regular use, that does not override the "term was primarily used during or before the Edo period" criterion applied to the [arch] tag. Many of our [arch] terms can be found in WWW pages, and usually they are used in the context of such historical settings.
I signed of on Marcus' change to [rare] for this one, but on reflection, I think it's best as [arch].

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

That book, 漢民族華南発展史研究, and the others listed in google books, look like research papers on the subject of ancient Chinese history.
If that is the standard we're going to use, probably all of our [arch] words could be changed to [rare].
We already discussed this in entry 2452650 and settled on keeping it as [arch].

>Nikkoku's source is 宋史−吐蕃趙思忠伝.
Nikkoku always list the earliest known reference, if I'm not mistaken, so an old example there isn't really indicative of it being arch. Since it's given as a synonym in daijr's 酋長 entry, I think this should be rare rather than arch. I'm getting some recent hits on google books e.g. 漢民族華南発展史研究 (1984).

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Old_and_Rarely_Used_Terms - 
 - "arch" (archaism). This is typically used to indicate that the term was primarily used during or before the Edo period.
 - "rare". This is used to indicate that a term, although in current use, is rarely encountered.

Quite. They are meant to be mutually exclusive. I'll go through them and remove the [rare] from the [arch] entries.
We have 3,000+ arch entries and 2,500+ rare entries, so the overlap is slight.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>

リアリティ番組	7004	76.1% already an entry
リアリティショー	2195	23.9%

It might seem a little anomolous but it's consistent with our style.
We've always omitted the articles from the noun glosses where possible (for space reasons). The 絹の道/シルクロード entries have only been "Silk Road". When adding extra information, often in parentheses, we've abbreviated where possible, but otherwise used grammatical English. Hence "precursor to the Silk Road" - dropping "the" from that would be odd.

Isn't it weird to have "the Silk Road" but "Steppe Route" without the article in the same gloss?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steppe_Route

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>the Steppe Route (precursor to the Silk Road)</gloss>
+<gloss>Steppe Route (precursor to the Silk Road)</gloss>

gg5 koj wiki

Oops, brain fart

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>pair of rocks assembling a married couple (one larger representing the husband, one smaller the wife)</gloss>
+<gloss>pair of rocks resembling a married couple (one larger representing the husband, one smaller the wife)</gloss>

kokugos gg5

esp. Meoto Iwa in Mie

仏像を自刻し	20,341

Seems those google n-gram counts are mostly from one phrase. But a google web search for "を自刻し" brings up some other collocations, and sankoku vouches for the [vs,vt] usage. I guess it's okay.

I think the counts for 自刻し are strange. The KM n-grams are quite different.

Second sense to cover the usage noted by Marcus

@@ -14,0 +15,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>carved by oneself</gloss>
+<gloss>sculpted by oneself</gloss>

sankoku:
  ｟名・他サ｠〔文〕自分で（自分の像を）彫刻すること。「━像」

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────╮
│ 　自刻　 │ 23,164 │
│ を自刻し │ 20,379 │
│ 　自刻の │    929 │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────╯

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -15,2 +14 @@
-<gloss>carved by oneself</gloss>
-<gloss>sculpted by oneself</gloss>
+<gloss>self-portrait (sculpture, carving, engraving, etc.)</gloss>

based on ngrams

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Obunsha lists this word in its kanwa entry for 遊.
  野山などを気楽に歩く。「遊歩・春遊・夜遊・物見遊山」

Pixiv's encyclopedia describes this word as 中国語.
  https://dic.pixiv.net/a/春遊
  春遊とは中国語で野に出て春を楽しむことを意味する。中国語での発音は「シュンヨウ」。

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬─────╮
│ 春遊 │ 379 │
│ 春游 │  71 │
╰─ーー─┴─────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>春游</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

春遊	379
daijs

Quiet. May as well close it.

Without getting encyclopedic I think this could do.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>...</gloss>
+<gloss>original kanji form</gloss>
+<gloss>base kanji form</gloss>

Came across here:
https://ja.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/癶 (after seeing an old hanafuda wrapper with 一発 written as 一癶)
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/原字
Might not really be current? Hardly finding anything online, nothing real for site:ac.jp 原字 げんじ
But lots of hits in Google Books from 1920s, 1930s

Not sure how to translate

GG5, etc.

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/受忍限度
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=受忍限度

受忍限度	7223

I wonder if the submitter came across でしゃばる and thought the 「で」 was a particle rather than 「出」.

This is why it would be nice if people would include more details than just a link to kotobank or "daijr/s" in their references when submitting new submissions, especially for extremely rare and archaic words like this one.

しゃばる	31

Only in nikkoku. Archaic and obscure. Not needed.

https://kotobank.jp/word/しゃばる-2048282#w-1996358

https://kotobank.jp/word/ジャスパー国立公園-76007

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Jasper National Park</gloss>
+<gloss>Jasper National Park (Canada)</gloss>

The only hit on wikipedia is a manga from 2007-2013.
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/新ナニワ金融道

I highly doubt this is used as an actual name (or at least I hope so; this name seems extremely unfortunate.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehmed

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<misc>&given;</misc>
+<misc>&male;</misc>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/メフメト2世