OK. Closing. I've tweaked the sentences. There weren't any really for sense 2.

GG5 and 中辞典 don't split, but I guess we should separate them. The vast majority of examples are for sense 2. I'll set up swap, and if agreed I'll need to do a lot of reindexing of examples sentences, which are in a mess.
The xref with 1457730 will need fixing too.

@@ -14,5 +13,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>house</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +20,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>house</gloss>

Shouldn't the "one's home" sense lead?

possessive, not adjectival, I think

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

All the JEs lead with "helper". "unwell" and "ill" are synonyms.

@@ -27,2 +27,2 @@
-<gloss>assistant (esp. of someone unwell or ill)</gloss>
-<gloss>helper</gloss>
+<gloss>helper (e.g. for a sick person)</gloss>
+<gloss>assistant</gloss>

It's only 介 that is ateji, but I'm not sure that needs a special mention.
Half of my kokugos have the okurigana-less version. I think it's okay to drop the [io] tag.

〈介／かい／カイ〉〈添（え）／副（え）／ぞえ／ゾエ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 介添え　 │ 23,863 │ 66.2% │
│ 介添　　 │ 11,091 │ 30.8% │
│ 介副　　 │    489 │  1.4% │
│ かい副　 │    247 │  0.7% │
│ かいぞえ │    330 │  0.9% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>

I do too. Maybe someone can add the others.

灰塗れ　 - daijr/s, koj, nhk accent
灰だらけ - nhk accent, koj (defines it as 灰まみれ)
灰被り　 - daijr, koj (this is actually a title of the story Cinderella in Japanese)

I think they're all worth recording

灰まみれ	2893	11.1%
灰だらけ	8712	33.4% not an entry
灰かぶり	14475	55.5% not an entry

A+B. If we need one (or even 2) entries for "ash-covered" for, say, reverse seaeches, it should not be this one.

灰塗れ	34	0.8%
灰まみれ	2893	65.2%
灰まみれの	1479	33.3%
灰まみれな	30	0.7%

https://www.suruga-ya.com/en/product/602226444
Deadpool (Ash-Covered Version) 
Japanese title: フィギュア デッドプール（灰まみれ版）

After volcanic ash covered the roofs of cars:
「灰まみれの朝」桜島が１１日夜爆発的噴火　鹿児島市街地側に降灰　１２日も噴煙は…
https://newsdig.tbs.co.jp/articles/gallery/149443

As with the other まみれ terms.
Huh.  One "Japanese" name for Cinderella is 灰かぶり姫 (comes up when you search this term)
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/シンデレラ
Also contains: 「灰まみれのエラ/シンダーエラ

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>灰まみれ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11 +14 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>ash-covered</gloss>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

Yoji dictionary references:
  https://yoji.jitenon.jp/yojic/1419.html
  https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/玉石混淆/

I think "mixed bag" is the most common way of expressing this concept, at least in American English. This is also what the priority example sentence uses.

Saito has "thread and thrum." That phrase and "wheat and tares" might be too old-fashioned for inclusion here.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 玉石混淆　　　　　 │ 19,070 │ 38.7% │
│ 玉石混交　　　　　 │ 29,774 │ 60.4% │ - move up (sankoku and iwakoku lead with this form)
│ ぎょくせきこんこう │    419 │  0.9% │
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>玉石混淆</keb>
+<keb>玉石混交</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>玉石混交</keb>
+<keb>玉石混淆</keb>
@@ -16,3 +16,4 @@
-<gloss>mixture of wheat and chaff</gloss>
-<gloss>mixture of the good and bad</gloss>
-<gloss>jumble of wheat and tares</gloss>
+<gloss>mixed bag</gloss>
+<gloss>mixture of good and bad</gloss>
+<gloss>jumble of wheat and chaff</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">mixture of precious gems and common rocks</gloss>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

I guess the extra sense works. I prefer the original order, as in GG5.

@@ -19,0 +20,9 @@
+<gloss>self restraint</gloss>
+<gloss>moderating one's own behavior</gloss>
+<gloss>penitence</gloss>
+<gloss>discipline</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -29,9 +37,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>self restraint</gloss>
-<gloss>moderating one's own behavior (behaviour)</gloss>
-<gloss>penitence</gloss>
-<gloss>discipline</gloss>

謹慎	220497	  
謹慎中	38738	  
謹慎処分	34573	  
謹慎し	13701	

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=謹慎
謹慎中の
suspended
謹慎期間
probation
校内謹慎処分
in-school suspension〔登校させるが通常の授業に出席させず、教師の監督下で自習。Saturday detentionより重い罰◆【略】ISS〕

https://www.weblio.jp/content/謹慎
謹慎（きんしん）は、江戸時代から明治時代初期にかけて日本に存在した自由刑の一種で、一定期間外出を禁止されることである。転じて、活動をしばらく休止することをも指す。

Modern, suspension of a coach for relations with a female player. Does not appear to be "house arrest":
立大の男子駅伝監督を謹慎処分　「指導者として不適切」
https://www.tokyo-np.co.jp/article/283077

Similar scenario, without 処分:
立教大の上野裕一郎・男子駅伝監督、女子部員との不適切な行為報道で無期限の謹慎 <---
https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/national/20231011-OYT1T50199/

sankoku has only the "house arrest", but words it as "家などで"(i.e., not only one's home).  Reverso quickly turned up "confined to his home city"
徳川慶喜は故郷の水戸市で謹慎する。
Condition Number One: Yoshinobu TOKUGAWA should confine himself within his hometown of Mito City.

Reverso turns up many instances glossed as "suspension", which is in daijs.

sankoku says [vs,vi], ngrams support.

I've split [1] and [2], though the kokugos cram them together.  We've left out the unifying nuance "for a period of self-reflection on one's wrongdoings", presumably before returning to society. (this is also apparent in the kanji).

[3] seems possibly arch. (not in sankoku). 

Spellcheck called out the spelling of behavior.

@@ -18,4 +18,4 @@
-<gloss>self restraint</gloss>
-<gloss>moderating one's behaviour</gloss>
-<gloss>penitence</gloss>
-<gloss>discipline</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>confinement (esp. to one's home)</gloss>
+<gloss>house arrest</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +25,13 @@
-<gloss>confinement to one's home</gloss>
-<gloss>house arrest</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2841593">謹慎処分</xref>
+<gloss>suspension (from work or school)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>self restraint</gloss>
+<gloss>moderating one's own behavior (behaviour)</gloss>
+<gloss>penitence</gloss>
+<gloss>discipline</gloss>

daijr, daijs, gg5

I'm not sure what was intended by the original split.
Only this way makes sense to me.

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>self restraint</gloss>
+<gloss>moderating one's behaviour</gloss>
@@ -20 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>house arrest</gloss>
@@ -24,2 +25,2 @@
-<gloss>self restraint</gloss>
-<gloss>moderating one's behaviour</gloss>
+<gloss>confinement to one's home</gloss>
+<gloss>house arrest</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

The JEs tend not to split senses, but I think this is appropriate.

I guess that works.

Maybe better to have example sentences to show it should usually be translated as "extremely"?

@@ -58,4 +58,3 @@
-<s_inf>usu. adj+限りです/だ</s_inf>
-<gloss>extremely</gloss>
-<gloss>absolutely</gloss>
-<gloss>very</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. adj+限り</s_inf>
+<gloss>being very much (in a certain state)</gloss>
+<gloss>extreme amount (of a feeling, etc.)</gloss>

Unidic: 限り 名詞-普通名詞-副詞可能

Yes, behaving adverbially. Odd glosses for a noun.

@@ -57 +57 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

Is it an adv in this usage? Syntactically it's a noun.

GG5 sense: 〔極み〕
ようやく彼の賛成を得ることができて喜ばしい限りだ. We are extremely pleased that we have finally obtained his approval.
その子供たちの姿は痛ましい限りだった. The children's appearance was absolutely heart-rending.
https://www.janguage.jp/material/grammar/grammar-advanced-9

This came up as an entry submission (2859126) and I see it's in GG5 as a sense which we don't really cover. Should be included. I'm putting it after the sense for which we have example sentences.

@@ -54,0 +55,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<s_inf>usu. adj+限りです/だ</s_inf>
+<gloss>extremely</gloss>
+<gloss>absolutely</gloss>
+<gloss>very</gloss>

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>five-household neighborhood unit (for mutual aid, self-protection, etc.) (Edo period)</gloss>
+<gloss>five-household neighborhood unit (for mutual aid, self-protection, etc.; Edo period)</gloss>

GG5: 〔江戸時代の〕 a five-household neighborhood unit of the Tokugawa period.
Koj, Daijr/s

Also "The Five" Russian composers.

@@ -22,4 +22,2 @@
-<misc>&hist;</misc>
-<gloss>a primitive policing system where peasants were communally responsible for others in their "group" (which did not necessarily number five people)</gloss>
-<gloss>frankpledge</gloss>
-<gloss>tithing</gloss>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>five-household neighborhood unit (for mutual aid, self-protection, etc.) (Edo period)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/五人組_(日本史)

frankpledge and tithing are olde tyme English words for the same thing; not sure how many people would actually search for it but seems harmless to throw them in

@@ -19,0 +20,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>a primitive policing system where peasants were communally responsible for others in their "group" (which did not necessarily number five people)</gloss>
+<gloss>frankpledge</gloss>
+<gloss>tithing</gloss>
+</sense>

To distinguish it from 抗生物質.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>antibiotic</gloss>
+<gloss>antibiotic (medicine)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&pharm;</field>

gg5

I don't think we need the plural form.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<field>&med;</field>
+<field>&pharm;</field>
@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>antibiotics</gloss>

抗生物質の	87320	  
抗生物質の投与	8193	  
抗生物質の点滴	4332	  
抗生物質の使用	4236	  
抗生物質の薬	3417	  
抗生物質の注射	2957	  
抗生物質の服用	2327	  
抗生物質の内服	1961	  
抗生物質の薬を	1861	  
抗生物質のお	1802	  
抗生物質の飲み	1780	  
doesn't look adjectival to me

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<field>&med;</field>

I think it's best to think of it as an entry-wide x-ref (a feature that will probably be added to JMdict: NG).
I've reindexed that sentence and chosen a new one for sense 1.

I don't think the antonym cross reference to sense 1 of 低い is right.
As I wrote last year in the entry for 低い:
  "Right now it seems we have
   低い[1] <-> 高い[2,3]
   低い[3] <-> 高い[1] (and possibly 低い[2])
   低い[4] <-> 高い[4,5]"

The current priority example sentence indexed to sense 01 of 高い seems like it should be sense 03 instead. It's definitely not high/tall.
  銀行はリスクの高い顧客へのローンには高い金利をつける。
  Banks charge higher interest on loans to risky customers.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────────╮
│ 高い　 │ 62,758,210 │
│ 高価い │      4,201 │ - [iK] to [sK]
│ たかい │    711,529 │
╰─ーーー─┴────────────╯

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<stagk>高い</stagk>

gg5 daijs
conflated "high (number)" (e.g. high blood levels) with 
"high (quality)" though both gg5 and daijs keep them apart
split "loud" and "high-pitched" though both gg5 and daijs 
keep them together

@@ -29,0 +30,15 @@
+<gloss>high-priced</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>high (level)</gloss>
+<gloss>above average (in degree, quality, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>loud</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>high-pitched</gloss>
+<gloss>shrill</gloss>

smk, senkoku

@@ -22,0 +23,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daij, koj

Added sense.
[vs] usage is archaic.
Not [adj-no].

@@ -18,2 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +21,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>writing down</gloss>
+<gloss>putting on record</gloss>
+</sense>

Consistency

@@ -29 +29 @@
-<s_inf>頂き,戴き</s_inf>
+<s_inf>esp. 頂き, 戴き</s_inf>
@@ -34 +34 @@
-<s_inf>頂き,戴き</s_inf>
+<s_inf>esp. 頂き, 戴き</s_inf>

弥る is from the discussion in 1537730. Not recorded in the usual kokugos; I only see it in the kanwas.
The kyūjitai form of 弥 is 彌. Since 弥 is not a kyūjitai, oK -> rK

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Time this was sorted out. Dropping 航る - it doesn't belong here. Reverting sense 1. Tweaking sense 2.

@@ -25,4 +24,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>航る</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -36,3 +31,0 @@
-<stagk>渡る</stagk>
-<stagk>渉る</stagk>
-<stagk>航る</stagk>
@@ -40,0 +34 @@
+<s_inf>usu. 渡る or 渉る</s_inf>
@@ -49 +43 @@
-<s_inf>prescriptively 亘る or 亙る, commonly 渡る</s_inf>
+<s_inf>orig. 亘る or 亙る, now commonly 渡る</s_inf>

School essay hand-corrected with red-ink for "misuse" of 渡る for [2]
https://salon.mainichi-kotoba.jp/archives/763
「わたる」は「渡る」を使う場合が多いのですが、範囲や期間をあらわす場合には使えません。

Wiktionary expends a fair amount of effort on the senses:
https://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/わたる
Seems we're maybe missing a form... 航る for ocean crossings...

Spanning years([2]):
年にわたって	139862	73.0%
年に渡って	44513	23.2%
年に亘って	6444	3.4%
年に渉って	226	0.1%
年に亙って	636	0.3%

Crossing via: (i.e. a bridge)
でわたって	1786	5.8%
で渡って	29095	94.1%
で亘って	0	0.0% <- not used
で渉って	37	0.1%
で亙って	0	0.0% <- not used

Explains that people use "渡る" "incorrectly"
https://wisdom-box.com/confusing/similar/wataru/
一方「亘る」は、「数カ月に亘る仕事（=数カ月に達する仕事）」とか「多方面に亘る知識（=広い範囲の知識）」などと使われます。つまり、「範囲や期間」をイメージするのですね。

Note: the respondent did not call 渡 an error, but did offer 亘:
「2年間に渡って」と「2年に渡って」、どっちが正しいですか？
https://ja.hinative.com/questions/736646
「2年に渡って(亘って)」が正しいです。
なぜなら「2年に渡って(亘って)」は、"2年の間、物事が継続している"という意味だからです。「2年間に渡って」だと、意味が重なってしまいます。


https://www.weblio.jp/content/わたって
亘って
読み方：わたって
ある程度や範囲に及んでいること。「渡る」の限定的な漢字遣い。 <--亘 not used for everything

Suggest a split, with [2] perhaps getting its own entry headed by 亘る (in spite of statistics). 

I've made edits which I don't expect to stand as-is. They reflect my understanding of the situation.

sankoku gives two entries, one for 亘る alone with sense [2], and one for 渡る；渉る, with literally 12 different senses. (wiktionary also has a pile of senses)

Quite coincidentally, this is on Stephen's spreadsheet, so might have gotten a look-over anyway.  I just stumbled into this entry.
https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/107

The [usu.] comments seem to differ from actual practice.  Primarily it looks like [1] is 渡, and [2] *should be* 亘.  In practice, [2] is [uk], and 渡 is actually the most common kanji form. (I'm assuming sense[2] statistics are reflected in 年にわたって statistics).  Note: the first corrected essay (first ref.) did not replace に渡って with 亘って, but kana わたって. 

If we split off 亘る, this might be a case for making a prescriptive overrule of the statistics, putting 亘る as the top-level kanji, and putting a usage [note=].  Obviously 渡る will necessarily be present on both entries.

Same rationale would apply to our standalone entry に渡って, which should possible by headed as に亘って. (or, we agree the world has changed, stodgy Japanese lit. teachers not withstanding).

What is more useful for us to report as the "best" kanji?  The one  that is most-used, or the one that won't lose marks on an essay? 

航る is limited to sea-crossings, but I tacked it on. Probably needs a sense to handle correctly. There is one example of this use in furigana.info.

@@ -24,0 +25,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>航る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -31,0 +36,3 @@
+<stagk>渡る</stagk>
+<stagk>渉る</stagk>
+<stagk>航る</stagk>
@@ -34 +40,0 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 渡る or 渉る</s_inf>
@@ -42 +48,2 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 亘る or 亙る</s_inf>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>prescriptively 亘る or 亙る, commonly 渡る</s_inf>

ngrams

渡る	1972118
亘る	76680
渉る	8520
亙る	7792
弥る	29

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog

@@ -26,2 +26,4 @@
-<gloss>being carried away by</gloss>
-<gloss>being enraptured by</gloss>
+<gloss>being fascinated (by)</gloss>
+<gloss>being carried away (by)</gloss>
+<gloss>being enraptured (by)</gloss>
+<gloss>being intoxicated (with)</gloss>

mk

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -23,0 +25 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, daij

Added sense. Used both figuratively and non-figuratively.
Not [adj-no].

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +21,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>being carried away by</gloss>
+<gloss>being enraptured by</gloss>
+</sense>

JEs just have sense 1.

Making the difference clearer.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>days and time</gloss>
+<gloss>days and hours</gloss>

daijr/s, meikyo, smk

@@ -18 +18,5 @@
-<gloss>date and time</gloss>
+<gloss>date and time (of a meeting, departure, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>days and time</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 罰当たり　 │ 48,452 │ 76.4% │
│ 罰当り　　 │  1,153 │  1.8% │
│ バチ当たり │ 12,797 │ 20.2% │
│ バチ当り　 │  1,002 │  1.6% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>バチ当たり</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>バチ当り</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Bulk update: Adjusting POS details
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

daij, koj

Added sense.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1548200">来日</xref>
@@ -15,2 +16,9 @@
-<gloss>arriving in Japan</gloss>
-<gloss>visiting Japan</gloss>
+<gloss>coming to Japan</gloss>
+<gloss>visit to Japan</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>coming to the imperial court (of an envoy, emissary, etc.)</gloss>

All the JEs just point to 来日.

wiktionary: 主に戦前の用法

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&dated;</misc>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

sankoku, daijr/s, smk, obunsha, g55
oxford: 'come into the presence or company of someone, especially by arrangement.
"Ruby called and we met up for lunch"'

pretty much all kokugos and gg5 either specify that it's getting together after arranging a meeting or use "約束" as an example
"meet up" seems to already imply that it's probably pre-arranged but i still thought it was warranted
removed "meet" (redundant) and moved up "rendezvous" (closer in meaning)

@@ -18,2 +18 @@
-<gloss>to meet</gloss>
-<gloss>to meet up</gloss>
+<gloss>to meet up (as arranged)</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>to gather</gloss>
+<gloss>to meet up</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>to get together</gloss>

Indexing is OK.

Thanks. I'll approve this, then reopen it to remind me to look at the indexing. It will be easier to do that once the latest example file is available in a couple of days.

I'll add "note" back in but without the [music] tag. It's not really music terminology.

@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>(musical) note</gloss>

GG5 (おと entry): 
高い[低い]音 a high-[low-]pitched sound
音の高さ pitch
〔演奏[歌唱]で〕 音を間違える play [sing] the wrong note(s)
〔演奏の前に〕 音を合わせる tune up.
GG5 (ね entry): ...〔楽器･鳥などの〕 (a) note ...
琴の音 the 「sound [tones] of a koto
笛の音 the piping of a flute

There's some ambivalence about the use of おと and ね in the context of musical notes. Perhaps we need a gloss here to reflect its use in expressions such as 高い音.

About 60% of the n-gram counts for 年寄り come from use of お年寄り. I've proposed an entry for that form.

sankoku

basically "お年寄り" should be used instead to be polite so maybe "sensitive" tag might be useful?

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&sens;</misc>

gg5 G-ngrams

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Should be split.

@@ -12,3 +11,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>しょうか</reb>

I meant to move it.

[nokanji] forms usually go last.

The しょうか reading definitely wouldn't be [uk], but oh well

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<reb>しょうか</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -16,3 +18,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>しょうか</reb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 小火 │  17,038 │  6.3% │
│ ぼや │ 144,345 │ 53.2% │
│ ボヤ │ 110,011 │ 40.5% │
╰─ーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+<reb>ボヤ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +22 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

daij
seeing no mebtion of a wind in kokugos

@@ -13 +13,6 @@
-<gloss>wind blowing down, coming over a mountain</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>crossing a mountain</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>other side of a mountain</gloss>

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>immediately after one's draw (in mahjong)</gloss>
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<gloss>immediately after one's draw</gloss>
@@ -21 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>winning off a discarded tile from the player to one's right or across the table on the turn after letting one's winning tile go by from the player to one's left (mahjong)</gloss>
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<gloss>winning off a discarded tile from the player to one's right or across the table on the turn after letting one's winning tile go by from the player to one's left</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/山越し

I tried to keep sense 3 short, but it's a pretty narrow sense.

@@ -15,0 +15,8 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>immediately after one's draw (in mahjong)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>winning off a discarded tile from the player to one's right or across the table on the turn after letting one's winning tile go by from the player to one's left (mahjong)</gloss>
+</sense>

山越し	3103
山越しする	31
山越しして	35
山越しをする	26
山越しをして	27

Straight vs is slightly more common.

山越し is vs, whixh implies (を)する

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&vs-i;</pos>

GG5 (splits)

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>thoughtless</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +18,7 @@
+<gloss>inhuman</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>thoughtless</gloss>
+<gloss>unthinking</gloss>
+<gloss>mindless</gloss>

I think inconsiderate should lead. "tasteless" seems off. "cruel" is maybe overstating things, as well.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>inconsiderate</gloss>
@@ -16,2 +17 @@
-<gloss>inconsiderate</gloss>
-<gloss>tasteless</gloss>
+<gloss>unkind</gloss>

取締班	357

I'm always reluctant to toss out terms that are in GG5 and other references. This is in Eijiro too along with several other rare XX取締班 compounds. 取締班 itself is not that common. Makes you wonder what is actually used.

麻薬取締班	53

Rare compound. I don't think it's worth keeping.

GG5, KOD

May as well stay.

A+B

送り迎え	223761
送り迎える	185

Trying to be a bit less clumsy.
I wouldn't bother with 送り迎える.

@@ -22 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>seeing (or dropping) off, then later picking up or going to meet (the same person)</gloss>
+<gloss>seeing someone off and later welcoming them back</gloss>
+<gloss>taking someone to and fro</gloss>

saw it on sankoku (maybe need new entry for "送り迎える"?)

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 送り迎え　 │ 223,761 │
│ おくり迎え │      70 │
│ 送りむかえ │     179 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>送りむかえ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

The JEs tend have "bright" close to the front.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>bright</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>bright</gloss>

sankoku, smk

sorry, somehow forgot refs
as for the order of the glosses, all kokugos describe "利発" using "回転が速い" so "clever" or "smart" seem more appropriate first rather than "intelligent"

??

References/case for edit needed,

@@ -16,0 +17,3 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<gloss>clever</gloss>
+<gloss>smart</gloss>
@@ -18 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>clever</gloss>
@@ -20 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>smart</gloss>

利発	27202
利発な	10170
利発を	23
利発が	45

Yes.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>shrewd</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>smart</gloss>

I don't think [dated] is appropriate here.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&dated;</misc>

GG5: nourishing [nutritious] food [sustenance]; nourishment; nutriment; aliment; nutrient.
中辞典: nourishing [nutritious] food; nourishment

@@ -12,2 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2128860">栄養物</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2128860">栄養物</xref>
@@ -14,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>nutritious food</gloss>

All "nourishment"
https://tr-ex.me/翻訳/日本語-英語/滋養物?search=滋養物

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=滋養物
nourishing food
nourishment（生命・健康を維持するために必要な）〔不可算〕
nutriment〔可算〕

daijs:
栄養物: 栄養素を多く含んだ飲食物。
滋養物: 滋養分を多く含んだ飲食物。滋養品。
滋養品: 栄養になる食物。滋養が多く含まれる飲食品。滋養物 (滋養品 is pretty rare, and we don't have it)

daijs glosses for 栄養物 and 滋養物 are clearly the same(apart from 栄養素 vs 滋養分).  But the few reverso entries for 滋養物 gloss it as "nourishment" (which is agnostic to food or drink). 

They are both explicitly not limited to food by daijs(飲食物).  daijs says "high in nutrients" but this doesn't appear in eijiro for any translations I've seen. Maybe "nourishment" carries this nuance well enough.

If I think this is a bit [dated], that would be consistent with thinking "nourishment" is a bit dated. I need some other opinions at this point. Maybe "nourishment" does belong at the xref. Maybe some xref terms belong here.

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>nourishing or nutritious food</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2128860">栄養物</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2128860">栄養物</xref>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
+<gloss>nourishment</gloss>

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>クマ狩り</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

OK, didn't see that in the first dictionary definition I got on Google, my bad.

"movement" by itself can refer to bowel movements. All the English dictionaries have it as a sense.
Several of the JEs have "(bowel) movement". I don't really mind which way we do it.

Why put "bowel" in brackets? If "movement" by itself can refer to "bowel movement" then it makes sense to me, but that doesn't seem to really be the case?

luminous, daij, smk
daijr: 「お通じ」と「お」を付けて用いることが多い
お通じがよく	7,639		
通じがよく	7,993		
お通じがある	2,426		
通じがある	2,537

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>bowel movement</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. お〜</s_inf>
+<gloss>(bowel) movement</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>defecation</gloss>
@@ -21 +23 @@
-<gloss>understanding</gloss>
+<gloss>understanding (of another's thoughts, feelings, etc.)</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

daijr:  胆汁を含んだままの熊の胆囊を乾燥させたもの。苦みが強い。利胆・消炎・鎮痙・強壮などの目的で用いる。熊胆。

Not the bile.
None of my refs have くまのい for 熊胆 (except koj which usually omits okurigana). I think 熊胆/ゆうたん should be split out.

@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>熊胆</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12,4 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ゆうたん</reb>
-<re_restr>熊胆</re_restr>
@@ -23,2 +16 @@
-<gloss>bear's gall (used as medicine for the stomach)</gloss>
-<gloss>bear's bile</gloss>
+<gloss>dried bear's gallbladder (used as a medicine)</gloss>

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<reb>クマノイ［nokanji］</reb>
+<reb>クマノイ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

熊の胆	3159	70.1%
クマノイ	1089	24.2%
クマの胆	257	5.7%

@@ -15,0 +16,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クマノイ［nokanji］</reb>

synonym

@@ -20,0 +20,1 @@
+<gloss>bear's bile</gloss>

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>trencher (trench digging machine)</gloss>
+<gloss>trench digging machine</gloss>
+<gloss>trencher</gloss>

https://item.rakuten.co.jp/haige/hg-trc200-a-n/

溝掘り機	208	12.7%
溝掘機	111	6.8%
トレンチャー	1325	80.6%

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trencher_(machine)
A trencher is a piece of construction equipment used to dig trenches, especially for laying pipes or electrical cables, for installing drainage, or in preparation for trench warfare. Trenchers may range in size from walk-behind models, to attachments for a skid loader or tractor, to very heavy tracked heavy equipment.


https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/溝掘機

Happen to be familiar with this piece of equipment. 

"ditching machine" is comparatively rare next to "trenching machine", which in turn is rare next to "trencher".  I don't know how many glosses we want to give, but "trencher" is quite versatile.

"ditching machine" site:twitter.com    one hit?
"trenching machine" site:twitter.com 40+ hits
"trencher" site:twitter.com  some people are named "trencher", so it's a bit hard to gauge.  Lots with pics though.

"trench digging machine" is more of a definition than a gloss, but it's the literal translation of the kanji, and serves to disambiguate.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>溝掘機</keb>
@@ -12 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>ditching machine</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2841722">トレンチャー</xref>
+<gloss>trencher (trench digging machine)</gloss>

OK

*daijirin, I meant. Not daijisen.

daijisen: 東京落語に登場する庶民の典型の二人の名から

I think this is clearer

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<s_inf>ref. to two 落語 characters</s_inf>
+<s_inf>from the names of two stock characters in rakugo</s_inf>

This was proposed in 2006 by Kanji Haitani. Kanji was a retired economics professor (then in his 80s) who in his retirement did translation, collecting yojijukugo, etc. In his submission, he wrote:
Reference to 「熊さん八っつあん」in 落語、in many web pages including:
http://www.wagamachigenki.jp/genki/report/041002-01.htm (dead link)
http://bookweb.kinokuniya.co.jp/htm/4480027165.html
http://www.kumahachi.net/ml.html  (dead link)
---
The 熊公八公 yoji, which is in GG5, clearly alludes to these two 落語 characters.
I'd prefer to keep this entry alive.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<s_inf>ref. to two 落語 characters</s_inf>

Daijirin has this ("熊公八公に同じ。")

I think it should at least be in the name dictionary. I've added a name for a stock character there before (越後屋, entry 5142046).

Quiet. Closing.

One more try

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>the average person</gloss>
+<gloss>uncultured but well-intentioned person</gloss>

It's a pretty rare expression and the definition 無教養ではあるが善意の庶民をいう称。 seems more precise than "average person" /Joe Blow/Bloggs to me.

GG5: 	the average person; your average nice guy; 《米》Joe Blow [《英》Joe Bloggs].

"average Joe" works OK for me. It's quite idiomatic English for this meaning. OTOH switching to GG5's version is not a problem.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>the average Joe</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2114640">熊さん八っつあん</xref>
+<gloss>the average person</gloss>

daijs
くまこう‐はちこう【熊公八公】 の解説
《落語などに出てくる庶民を代表する二人の名から》無教養ではあるが善意の庶民をいう称。熊さん八つぁん。

I don't think "average Joe" is an appropriate translation here.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2114640">熊さん八っつあん</xref>

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1889050">先輩風を吹かす</xref>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

先輩面をする	86
先輩づらをする	0
先輩面	2726
先輩づら	388
GG5, etc.

Should keep the base form.

@@ -5 +5,5 @@
-<keb>先輩面をする</keb>
+<keb>先輩面</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>先輩づら</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8 +12 @@
-<reb>せんぱいづらをする</reb>
+<reb>せんぱいづら</reb>
@@ -11,2 +15,2 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&vs-i;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -14 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>to put on an air of seniority</gloss>
+<gloss>air of seniority</gloss>
+<gloss>patronizing attitude</gloss>

先輩面をする	86	1.8%
先輩面をし	441	9.2%
先輩面する	670	14.0%
先輩面し	3601	75.1%

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&vs-i;</pos>

Can drop the explanation of nutrition.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>nutrition (i.e. food or other nourishment)</gloss>
+<gloss>nutritious food</gloss>
+<gloss>nourishing food</gloss>
+<gloss>nutrition</gloss>

適切な栄養物	529	36.6% proper nutrition
よい栄養物	506	35.0%  good nutrition
スポーツの栄養物	271	18.8% sports nutrition (not "the science of", but food for)
悪い栄養物	138	9.6%  poor nutrition

All "nutrition", including some collocations:
https://tr-ex.me/翻訳/日本語-英語/栄養物

Everything (mostly nutrition)
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/栄養物

A fair number of nutrients (maybe 1/3 of "nutrition")
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/栄養物#nutrients

"nutrition" in this sense:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/nutrition
the substances that you take into your body as food [and the way that they influence your health]:
Good nutrition is essential if patients are to make a quick recovery.


https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nutrition
NOURISHMENT sense 1
… get adequate nutrition both before and during the race.
: FOOD, NUTRIMENT

Oxford:
food or nourishment.
"a feeding tube gives her nutrition and water"

========== Some hits for "nutrients" outside of reverso

https://tr-ex.me/翻訳/日本語-英語/栄養物
get/take （enough）nutrients は、nutrientは形容詞で栄養を含む、滋養になることを言います。また、名詞では、栄養物、栄養になる食物、栄養素を指します。

https://nativecamp.net/blog/20230607-nutrition
栄養摂取はnutrient intake、nutrientは栄養物や栄養素、intakeは食物などの摂取を表すためです。

If kept, I think "nutrients" needs to be plural here (various ~物 terms are plural).  This is never 1 nutrient (栄養素). 

It doesn't seem like it should be, but the collocations and parallel translations seem to suggest that it is just "nutrition".

Critically, not the "science of nutrition", so some distinction is needed.

"nutriment" could go here, if others here are familiar with the word.  It never shows up in reverso, and I've never heard of it myself, and it doesn't come up in reverso at all.

"nourishment" is a synonym, but seems like an awkward(perhaps [dated]) gloss to me. At least, we don't talk about getting nourishment from breakfast cereal. All the translations I see that do this are quite stiff.

I didn't want to confuse "nutrient" given　栄養分 and 栄養素, but it seems there is a case for it.  At least it's plural here with some context.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>nutritive material</gloss>
+<gloss>nutrition (i.e. food or other nourishment)</gloss>
+<gloss>nutrients</gloss>

Entry created

如露亦如電	568	100.0%
如露如電	0	0.0%

https://kotobank.jp/word/如露亦如電-2071410


如露如電 1 news hit
如露亦如電 45 news hits

reversing xref. will copy this gloss to the other side.

The 5-character is not common, but maybe not rare for being what it is (a piece of Buddhist philosophy).  This 4 character version is rare vs. the 5 character version.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2413010">如露亦如電</xref>

Remove unsupported yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>existence (as we percieve it) is as mutable and incorporeal as is the morning dew or a flash of lightning</gloss>
+<gloss>existence (as we perceive it) is as mutable and incorporeal as is the morning dew or a flash of lightning</gloss>

こよなく愛する	749485
こよなく愛した	39836
こよなく愛して	119995
こよなく	1283174

True, but as a very common stock phrase I think it's worth keeping. It accounts for most of the use of こよなく.

A+B. Meaning is obvious.

https://www.edrdg.org/wwwjdic/wwwverbinf.html#suru_tag

No, vs-s because it's こよなく + 愛する. See the referenced page.
vs-i are "regular" する formations such as 勉強する.

Shouldn't this be vs-i? What'. the difference between the two?

〈蚊／か〉〈帳／や〉〈吊（り）／釣（り）／つり〉〈草／ぐさ〉／カヤツリグサ

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ かやつり草　 │    562 │  3.8% │ - add, sK
│ 蚊帳吊り草　 │    501 │  3.4% │ - add, sK
│ 蚊帳吊草　　 │    219 │  1.5% │
│ 蚊帳つり草　 │     57 │  0.4% │
│ 蚊帳釣り草　 │     54 │  0.4% │ - add, sK
│ 蚊帳釣草　　 │     48 │  0.3% │
│ カヤツリグサ │ 11,961 │ 80.8% │
│ かやつりぐさ │  1,396 │  9.4% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12,12 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>かやつり草</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蚊帳吊り草</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蚊帳釣り草</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

蚊帳吊草	219	82.0% <- GG5
蚊帳釣草	48	18.0% <- 中辞典, ルミナス

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蚊帳釣草</keb>

かやつりぐさ【莎草】 is in various 国語辞典 (daijirin, daijisen, kojien, shinmeikai, etc.)

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>蚊帳吊草</re_restr>

It seems like these readings should be restricted like this.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_restr>蚊帳吊草</re_restr>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<re_restr>莎草</re_restr>

I think it's two senses, one intransitive and one transitive.

@@ -12,0 +13,7 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
+<gloss>absorption (in an activity)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -15,2 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>intoxicating</gloss>
-<gloss>intoxication</gloss>
+<gloss>intoxication (of someone)</gloss>
+<gloss>enrapturing</gloss>
+<gloss>carrying (someone) away</gloss>

meini example in daij
vt in the ezample

is the gloss really correct?
daijr
魔力で引き入れられたように，あることに熱中すること。また，陶酔させること。

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>

Entry created

Needs gerund glosses.

@@ -14,2 +14,4 @@
-<gloss>viewed as inevitable</gloss>
-<gloss>regarded as reasonable</gloss>
+<gloss>regarding as (quite) natural</gloss>
+<gloss>regarding as something to be expected</gloss>
+<gloss>regarding as a matter of course</gloss>
+<gloss>regarding as right and proper</gloss>

当然視	7638	 
当然視する	1844
当然視して	1256
当然視される	615
当然視されて	2034

Could go either way. GG5 has a subentry of 当然視.

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>considering to be inevitable</gloss>
-<gloss>considering to be reasonable</gloss>
+<gloss>viewed as inevitable</gloss>
+<gloss>regarded as reasonable</gloss>

better this way?

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>当然視する</keb>
+<keb>当然視</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>とうぜんしする</reb>
+<reb>とうぜんし</reb>
@@ -11,3 +11,5 @@
-<pos>&vs-i;</pos>
-<gloss>to consider to be inevitable</gloss>
-<gloss>to consider to be reasonable</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>considering to be inevitable</gloss>
+<gloss>considering to be reasonable</gloss>

Entry created

https://www.italki.com/ja/post/TY1DUCwV2bas6r0aufD9vC
一切有为法
All conditioned phenomena
如梦幻泡影
are like dreams, illusions, bubbles, shadows,
如露亦如電
dew and lightning
應作如是觀

https://diamond-sutra.com/read-the-diamond-sutra-here/diamond-sutra-chapter-32/
“So I say to you –
This is how to contemplate our conditioned existence in this fleeting world:”

“Like a tiny drop of dew, or a bubble floating in a stream;
Like a flash of lightning in a summer cloud,
Or a flickering lamp, an illusion, a phantom, or a dream.”

“So is all conditioned existence to be seen.”

Just if you were also curious...From the "Diamond Sutra"

When I counted "news" results, it was for google's very loose definition of "news" (twitter, bloggish things). 

This is just a chunk of a larger passage.  If you do an image search, you'll actually encounter products with the whole thing.

A memorial stone(fragment of passage):
http://bangaifudasho.web.fc2.com/nyoroyakunyoroden.html

Calligraphy: (whole passage)
https://ameblo.jp/yuyu-chiba/entry-12308699237.html

reversed xrefs. aligned glosses. stats at xref.

@@ -11,4 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2149980">如露如電</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2149980">如露如電</xref>
-<gloss>like dew or lightning, gone in a flash</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
+<gloss>existence (as we perceive it) is as mutable and incorporeal as is the morning dew or a flash of lightning</gloss>

Entry created

I think it's confusing to call this an adjective.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>

前項に規定する	204628

It came out of the "Standard Legal Terms Dictionary" and is apparently a stock term in legal texts. Probably worth keeping. Not used as a verb.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&vs-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>

Overly compositional

Seems common. I'd leave it.

Delete?

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&vs-i;</pos>

GG5

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>to punish someone with death</gloss>

sankoku, daijr, obunsha, gg5

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>to put to death</gloss>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<gloss>to put to death (e.g. a sinner, traitor, etc.)</gloss>

koj, daij, gg5

split of scott's submission for 誅

daijs: 新聞やニュース番組などで、緊急性のない情報。暇なときに用意しておいて、埋め草として利用するねた。
Collins (filler): articles, photographs, etc, to fill space between more important articles in the layout of a newspaper or magazine

I think this works.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>news unrelated to major events or pressing social conditions</gloss>
+<gloss>filler</gloss>

@@ -11,4 +10,0 @@
-<reb>ひまネタ</reb>
-<re_restr>暇ネタ</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -16 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>暇ねた</re_restr>

daijr
http://news.livedoor.com/article/detail/2799860/

I was initially going to go with "fluff piece", but there's disagreement among the first few Google hits on whether that means "unimportant news piece" or "puff piece".

daijirin: 〔中国語「栄和(ロンホー)」の略〕

This kanji form is practically never used in Japanese

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>
@@ -16 +17 @@
-<gloss>winning by picking up a discarded tile (mahjong)</gloss>
+<gloss>winning by picking up a discarded tile</gloss>

daijs

I agree with Marcus. I don't think we need to be concerned about ラリッタ. It's not common.

ラリッタ	259	2.9%
ラリル	8390	94.5%
ラリッテル	226	2.5%

At 259 Google n-grams for ラリッタ, it seems like a weak basis for keeping it,. I think this entry is also potentially "harmful" in that users could reverse search their way here and misundersrand how to use it.

As I commented back in 2015, the only reason for having this is the ラリッタ form, which doesn't clearly align with ラリる.
We could have it as the only form in the entry, but ラリッた and らりった may as well be there too.

ラリッた	1382	  
ラリッた状態	89	  
ラリッたよう	79	  
ラリッたり	73	  
ラリッた感じ	70	  
ラリッたような	61	  
ラリッた状態で	46	  
ラリッた大学生	43	  
ラリッた頭	41	  
ラリッた人	39	  
ラリッた感じの	38

I don't think this is particularly common as an adjective (as opposed to the past tense of ラリる). I think it can go.

熊肉	8584	86.8%
くま肉	119	1.2%
クマ肉	1181	11.9%

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>クマ肉</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Unidic

wiki

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 板バネ　 │ 25,975 │ 68.7% │
│ 板ばね　 │ 10,855 │ 28.7% │
│ 板発条　 │      0 │  0.0% │ - rK (daijr/s, koj)
│ いたバネ │    815 │  2.2% │ - drop
│ いたばね │    156 │  0.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,4 +14,0 @@
-<reb>いたバネ</reb>
-<re_restr>板バネ</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -19,2 +15,0 @@
-<re_restr>板ばね</re_restr>
-<re_restr>板発条</re_restr>

N-grams:
板ばね	10855
板発条	< 20
板バネ	25975

Reordering.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>板バネ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,3 +13,4 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>板バネ</keb>
-</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>いたバネ</reb>
+<re_restr>板バネ</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -18,4 +21,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>いたバネ</reb>
-<re_restr>板バネ</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
@@ -24 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>leaf spring, plate spring</gloss>
+<gloss>leaf spring</gloss>
+<gloss>plate spring</gloss>

koj daij gg5

Appears to be overwhelmingly intransitive.
I think "in a different direction" is redundant.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -14 +15 @@
-<gloss>steering in a different direction</gloss>
+<gloss>steering</gloss>

Probably could be both.

vi?

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>change of course (ship)</gloss>
+<gloss>change of course (of a ship)</gloss>

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1722290">あじつけのり</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1722290">味付け海苔</xref>
+<field>&food;</field>

Aligning.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>seasoned nori (laver)</gloss>
+<gloss>seasoned nori</gloss>

Next time provide some.

Seems from www hits that it's an abbreviation.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

I prefer the "(something)".

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>to use ... as a selling point</gloss>
+<gloss>to use (something) as a selling point</gloss>

better? or (something)

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<s_inf>as Xを売りにする</s_inf>
-<gloss>to use X as a selling point</gloss>
+<s_inf>as …を売りにする</s_inf>
+<gloss>to use ... as a selling point</gloss>

I think it's useful to distinguish it from 売りに出す, which is the major use of 売りに, and is of course a case of sense 1. Of the 12 Tanaka sentences using 売りに, 11 are for 売りに出す and 1 is 売りにする

Given that the second sense of 売り is "selling point", I don't feel this is needed. It's a standard use of the XをYにする construction. I think the meaning is obvious enough.

売りにする	28955
売りにして	96248


売り物にする	18285
売り物にして	28723


https://www.asahi.com/articles/photo/AS20190709003887.html
"パンプス反対、噴き出た性差別「女を売りにしたくせに」
...
　《あんた女売り物にしててそれが出来なくなったら女性差別とか騒ぐんかい》"

https://thesaurus.weblio.jp/content/売りにして
"商品や芸能人などを世に広めるために、それが持っている特徴を強調するさま"

Potentially useful?
I really dislike using "X" etc. both in notes and glosses but couldn't come up with anything better. Feel free to improve (as 
always)

熊鍋	4358	79.8%
くま鍋	438	8.0%
クマ鍋	667	12.2%

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>クマ鍋</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

In Unidic too.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>bear meat hot pot</gloss>
+<field>&food;</field>
+<gloss>bear meat hotpot</gloss>

熊鍋	4358
熊肉鍋	123
wiki redir to 熊肉
oldest mention on google books, 1900:
https://books.google.co.jp/books?
id=-6AG6k8FzTYC&q=%22%E7%86%8A%E9%8D%8B%22&dq=%22%E7%86%8A%E9%8D%8B%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjWwPO_quXrAhUb_GEKHQelBN44jAE
Q6AEwAXoECAAQAg
"そのころ、家には、十人ほどの奉公人がいたが、毎日の熊鍋で閉口のていだった
。熊からとった脂肪を大きいガラスびんに詰めて、やけどや凍傷につけたりした
。それから三十年ほどたったあるとき、軽い胃けいれんをやったので、その
熊の胆 ..."
(doesn't seem like an OCR mishap)
https://www.47news.jp/137423.html　(kyodo)
奥深いおふくろの味　特注鍋でもてなす「熊鍋」　【ＧＯＨＡＮスペシャル】
https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/bear-meat-hot-pot-cuisine/kgEY91Gp22fb_g

In that case it shouldn't be hard to provide some references.

more common than you'd expect!

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,5 +12,0 @@
-<re_restr>熊鈴</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>クマすず</reb>
-<re_restr>クマ鈴</re_restr>

Yes, that's enough.

熊鈴	6520
くま鈴	142
クマ鈴	775
https://www.backpacker.com/news-and-events/do-bear-bells-really-work/
Ask a Bear: Do Bear Bells Really Work?

Don't think it needs to be explained

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>クマ鈴</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_restr>熊鈴</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クマすず</reb>
+<re_restr>クマ鈴</re_restr>
@@ -12,2 +20 @@
-<gloss>bear bells</gloss>
-<gloss>bear repellent items to avoid encountering bears</gloss>
+<gloss>bear bell</gloss>

https://sakidori.co/article/864815

熊鈴は、熊との遭遇を避けるために身に着ける熊よけアイテムのひとつ

Thanks. Two other sources have せつだんせん.

It seems there was some confusion over 切断 (せつだん) and 断裁 (だんさい)?

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>だんさいせん</reb>
+<reb>せつだんせん</reb>

ｇｇ５
http://www.katsuda-works.co.jp/products/index.html
 定盤表面硬質クロームメッキ・カットライン（切断線指示装置）


カットライン	18004 (not in gg5)
切断線	3045

Usually written with a hyphen.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>middle old (person between 75 and 84 years old)</gloss>
+<gloss>middle-old (person between 75 and 84 years old)</gloss>

jitsuyo daijr

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6301865/
Although there are different ways to classify this population, some studies have classified elderly adults between the ages of 65 and 74 years as youngest-old, those between ages 75 and 84 years as middle-old, and those aged over 85 years as oldest-old [5].

Thanks

Reading had こう and くう swapped.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>てんばくうこう</reb>
+<reb>てんばこうくう</reb>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/天馬行空/
https://imidas.jp/fourchars/detail/X-01-S-19-A-0021.html
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/天馬行空

天馬行空	1076

OK

@@ -19,3 +19,3 @@
-<s_inf>on a sign</s_inf>
-<gloss>Watch out for bears</gloss>
-<gloss>Beware of bears</gloss>
+<s_inf>on trail signage, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>watch out for bears</gloss>
+<gloss>beware of bears</gloss>

I'm comfortable with this. WWW images show it on a lot of T-shirts...

Brian raised a topic on Github ([JMdictProject/JMdictIssues] Allowing inclusion of common road signage / placards as idiomatic (Issue #92)) arguing for including this as an entry.

My issue with 熊没出注意 is that it is 1) not to my knowledge officially used on road signage but on trail heads and the like (though I don't live in bear country and could be misinformed), and 2) is one of several forms used, albeit the most common in the ngrams at a combined 58%, 3) very compositional where 熊 could be replaced by any other animal you might want to warn for. That said looking at the ngrams and google images it's at least 90x more common than 猿/サル出没注意 so this point might be moot.

熊注意	3182	13.6%
熊出没注意	11851	50.8%
熊に注意	3472	14.9%
クマ注意	915	3.9%
クマ出没注意	1670	7.2%
クマに注意	2237	9.6%

It is true that adding it to JMdict would mean it would likely pop up at the top for searches for 熊出没注意　英語, but Tatoeba sentences are also indexed by services like Weblio so adding it there instead of here, as I suggested when deleting this, should have much the same effect.

Top 10 N-grams Lookup for 咽喉を (Frequency Order)
咽喉を	9385	  
咽喉を鳴らし	606	  
咽喉を持つ	451	  
咽喉を使用し	449	  
咽喉を使用	449	  
咽喉を使用して	448	  
咽喉を使用して酵素	448	  
咽喉を潤し	438	  
咽喉を通ら	396	  
咽喉を痛め	334	  
咽喉を鳴らして	316	  

Top 10 N-grams Lookup for 咽喉を扼 (Frequency Order)
咽喉を扼する	22

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

OK

daijr/s

I don't think it's military terminology.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<field>&mil;</field>
@@ -15 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>to obtain control of a key position</gloss>
+<gloss>to gain control of a key position</gloss>
+<gloss>to command a key position</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vs-s;</pos>
+<field>&mil;</field>
@@ -14 +15 @@
-<gloss>obtain control of a key position</gloss>
+<gloss>to obtain control of a key position</gloss>

sankoku, daijr/s, gg5

That seems to work to a point, although the "spare the rod" is about avoiding punishment.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>spare the rod, spoil the child</gloss>

non-lit gloss seems cery clumsy to me. Isn't this essentially a variation of かわいい子には旅をさせよ? That's glossed as "spare the rod, spoil the child."

Seems OK.

* jitsuyō: https://www.weblio.jp/content/獅子は我が子を千尋の谷に落とす
* https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q11135252456

獅子は我が子を千尋 560 85.4%
獅子はわが子を千尋  96 14.6%

Closest expression in English is probably "tough love", but not exactly the same.

限りです	1307451
限りだ	144031

This is really a sense of 限り/かぎり and is best covered in that entry. It's in GG5 and I've proposed an extra entry based on it.

https://www.janguage.jp/material/grammar/grammar-advanced-9
https://www.mlcjapanese.co.jp/n1_04_12.html

Google N-gram Corpus Counts (probably very inflated by 限り being used in other contexts, still useful imo)
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 限りです　 │ 1,307,451 │ 90.1% │
│ かぎりです │   144,143 │  9.9% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

校時	51787

Not sure it's really a counter.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>counter for school periods in a school day</gloss>
+<gloss>counter for periods in a school day</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/校時#学校等で用いられる場合
https://www.hachinohenishi-h.asn.ed.jp/shoukai/kouji.htm
https://www.city.minoh.lg.jp/nishi-ele/html/gakkouyourann/kouji/kouji.html

３校時 is probably equiv. of ３時間目 or ３時限目

OK

nipp

Maybe this is better? Pretty wide (and detailed) definition in nipp.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>medicine for intestinal disorders (upset stomachs, diarrhea, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>medicine for treating digestive disorders (e.g. antidiarrheals, probiotics)</gloss>
+<gloss>gastrointestinal drug</gloss>

Daijr/s.

The kokugos make it sound more significant.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>medicine for intestinal disorders</gloss>
+<gloss>medicine for intestinal disorders (upset stomachs, diarrhea, etc.)</gloss>

When I hear xintestinal disordersx I think of more serious diseases like IBS. I think 整腸剤 are mainly used for upset stomaches, diarrhea and the like.

GG5: 整腸剤[薬] 【薬】 drugs for controlling intestinal function; medicine for intestinal disorders.
中辞典: 	(a) medicine for intestinal disorders.
ルミナス: indigestion remedy [C]; medicine for intestinal disorders

I think this is simpler.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>medication used to treat temporary discomfort of the stomach (e.g. antacids)</gloss>
+<gloss>medicine for intestinal disorders</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>medication used to treat temporary discomfort of the stomach (e.g. antacids)</gloss>
+<gloss>medicine for intestinal disorders</gloss>

整腸	121880	66.3%
整腸剤	44474	24.2% daij etc.
整腸薬	17406	9.5%

more commonly as xref

All the results appear to be hospital-related. I think one gloss is sufficient.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>serving tea (esp. with meals in hospital)</gloss>
-<gloss>tea distribution</gloss>
+<gloss>serving tea (to hospital patients, esp. during meals)</gloss>

Most WWW hits are hospital-related, e.g. "配茶サービス終了のお知らせ. 当院では、入院患者さんへお茶をお配りしておりまし. たが、安全面・衛生面・感染面を検討した結果"

Clearer?

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>providing with tea</gloss>
+<gloss>serving tea (esp. with meals in hospital)</gloss>
+<gloss>tea distribution</gloss>

配茶	1231
saw in hospital brochure:
*配茶
毎食時、コップ1杯のお茶をお配りしております

Seems OK.

https://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/当週#:~:text=ある出来事が発生した（又は発生する）週。

当週	2629
Styled after 当日.

daijs: カエデの古名。

This is archaic.

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -10 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19,4 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>カエルデ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
@@ -25,4 +18,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2061900">楓・かえで</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>maple (Acer spp.)</gloss>
-<gloss>maple tree</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2061900">カエデ</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>maple (tree)</gloss>

Split from 2061900

OK

How is this?

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>to put one's weight on (e.g. one leg)</gloss>
+<gloss>to put (one's) weight on (e.g. one leg)</gloss>

I think it's OK. Removes possible ambiguity.

I think it's OK. "to put all one's weight on X" is a very common expression.

On the one hand that's true, but I think it's better to give the more common expression, not least for the sake of native Japanese users (and other ESL users)