Since "thick" has many meanings, I don't think it works well as the first gloss.

The example sentence was indexed to the other ドロドロ entry. I updated it to point to this one (泥々[1]{どろどろ}~)

@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>thick</gloss>
@@ -31,0 +31 @@
+<gloss>thick</gloss>

Certainly

@@ -7 +6,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>

Can we remove the priority tag from 泥々?

Yes, it should be iK.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -9,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

sankoku, daijr/s, smk

@@ -32,0 +33,10 @@
+<gloss>pillar (of a group, system, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>member (of an organization, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&horse;</field>
+<gloss>first corner</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

daijr/s, Luminous

@@ -24,0 +24,1 @@
+<gloss>part</gloss>

Fixing x-ref

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1161400">一角・いっかく・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1161400">イッカク・5</xref>

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1161400">一角・いっかく・3</xref>

@@ -20,1 +20,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1575200">麒麟</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1575200">麒麟・2</xref>

@@ -20,0 +20,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1575200">麒麟</xref>

PoS/gloss alignment

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -22 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5; genius; meikyo

@@ -19,0 +20,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>
+<gloss>one-way (e.g. communication)</gloss>
+<gloss>one-sided</gloss>
+</sense>

Adding yoji tags based on gakken, shinmeikai and-or jitenon
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

GG5: a patent of decoration; a decoration diploma
中辞典: commendation accompanying the award of a decoration

GG5's "patent" is correct, but very dated English. I like the 中辞典 version. (Two colleagues received these recently and I attended the ceremonies at the Japanese consulate. The documents are impressive.)

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>certificate accompanying a medal bestowed by the state</gloss>
+<gloss>commendation accompanying the award of a decoration</gloss>

sankoku:政府から勲等（例えば勲三等）をおくるということを書き付けた文書。

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/勲章_(日本)#勲記

Google thinks this is "a medal" and I awards no points(spot on, google):
勲章の受章者には、勲章の他に勲記が授与される。
google: In addition to the medal, recipients of the medal are also awarded a medal.

"decoration diplomas" was added in 2022:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orders,_decorations,_and_medals_of_Japan
Conferral of decoration diplomas

Emperor Meiji's signature and State Seal of Japan. This State Seal was created in 1874 and is still in use today, and is affixed to all decoration diplomas of conferred orders.
In addition to the decorations, the recipient to one of the orders is also awarded a decoration diploma. The diploma is a certificate bearing the name of the recipient, the name of the order awarded, the date of the award, the name of the awarding authority, etc., along with the State Seal of Japan. The text and content of the diploma according to the type of decoration. All the text in the diplomas is written vertically.

And this is where I started. Image search 勲記, and in the bottom-center of every page is a the image of the medal received. Many are framed with the medal beside.

Only a single page on all of wikipedia uses the term "decoration diploma".  It is the page on Japanese honors, where the section on "decoration diplomas" was added in 2022, likely as a translation of the Japanese side.  I don't think this is a word, and I don't think it makes a very useful gloss (reverso never uses it). 

I think a good reverso gloss was:
このうち、名誉勲章の勲記は以下のとおりである。
His Medal of Honor citation reads as follows.

Maybe "citation" could work here. But "medal of honor" is too loaded in English to be used generically without also causing confusion.

Another, which I would also not adopt, is:
"Ambassador Kai read out the Patent of Decoration"

Here we have "award certificate"
"Dr. Friedman was presented his award by Emperor Akihito and received the award certificate from Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at the ceremony for the First Order of Merit and higher awards." 

I lied, here's one...
Even the lower rank like Kun hachito (the 8th Order of Merit) whose Kunki (decoration diploma) does not have the name of the Emperor in it, was described to be "conferred by the Emperor."

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>decoration diploma</gloss>
-<gloss>diploma</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1247240">勲章</xref>
+<gloss>certificate accompanying a medal bestowed by the state</gloss>

I agree. Done.

@@ -16,4 +15,0 @@
-<reb>けんしん</reb>
-<re_restr>欠伸</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -32 +27,0 @@
-<stagr>あくび</stagr>

けんしん is only in daijs, koj and nikk. I suggest splitting it out into a separate [rare] entry.

I agree about けんづくり.

https://www.weblio.jp/content/欠
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/欠伸_(あくび)/

I'm not seeing けんづくり in daijisen. Shinmeikai mentions it in a note in its entry for あくび.

Meikyo has a list of similar constructions in its entry for 旁.
  「所」の「斤（おのづくり）」、「対」の「寸（すんづくり）」、「形」の「彡（さんづくり）」など。

We have entries for all three of those (斧旁, 彡旁, etc.)

I think けんづくり would be better in a separate entry for 欠旁 if it's needed.

@@ -20,4 +19,0 @@
-<reb>けんづくり</reb>
-<re_restr>欠</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -37 +32,0 @@
-<stagr>けんづくり</stagr>

daijs

@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+<reb>けんづくり</reb>
+<re_restr>欠</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -32,0 +37 @@
+<stagr>けんづくり</stagr>

gg5, prog

@@ -22,6 +22,6 @@
-<gloss>complicating</gloss>
-<gloss>entangling</gloss>
-<gloss>intricating</gloss>
-<gloss>intertwining</gloss>
-<gloss>mixing up</gloss>
-<gloss>involuting</gloss>
+<gloss>becoming complicated</gloss>
+<gloss>becoming involved</gloss>
+<gloss>being intricate</gloss>
+<gloss>becoming entangled</gloss>
+<gloss>becoming jumbled</gloss>
+<gloss>becoming mixed up</gloss>

sankoku, daijr/s, smk, meikyo, gg5

@@ -20,5 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>complication</gloss>
-<gloss>intricacy</gloss>
-<gloss>involution</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
@@ -27,2 +22,6 @@
-<gloss>to become complicated</gloss>
-<gloss>to get entangled</gloss>
+<gloss>complicating</gloss>
+<gloss>entangling</gloss>
+<gloss>intricating</gloss>
+<gloss>intertwining</gloss>
+<gloss>mixing up</gloss>
+<gloss>involuting</gloss>

[vi]: shinmeikai, meikyo, etc.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 錯綜　　 │ 158,486 │ 99.3% │
│ 錯そう　 │   1,086 │  0.7% │ - sK
│ さくそう │   2,793 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,0 +26 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Yes, I forgot to remove it.

No results for "脂肉" on youglish.

Since the new entry for 脂肉 already has a cross reference pointing here, "脂肉[rK]" doesn't seem extra helpful. Maybe if it was in more references than just smk.

@@ -9,4 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>脂肉</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Now that 脂肉/あぶらにく is an entry, I think 脂肉 (on this entry) should either be tagged as rK or dropped (to avoid confusion). I doubt 脂肉 would ever be read as あぶらみ without furigana. My IME only suggests 脂身 for あぶらみ.

smk: 「脂肉」とも書く。

〈脂／あぶら／アブラ〉〈身／肉／み／ミ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 脂身　　 │ 225,428 │ 96.7% │
│ 脂肉　　 │   1,345 │  0.6% │ - add, sK
│ あぶら身 │     735 │  0.3% │ - sK
│ アブラ身 │     426 │  0.2% │
│ 脂み　　 │     224 │  0.1% │
│ あぶら肉 │     120 │  0.1% │
│ アブラ肉 │      46 │  0.0% │
│ あぶらみ │   2,624 │  1.1% │
│ アブラミ │   2,126 │  0.9% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+<keb>脂肉</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

事務処	1919

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>事務処</keb>

Yes, good [sK] candidate.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────────┬───────╮
│ 事務所　 │ 15,160,823 │ 99.9% │
│ 事ム所　 │        752 │  0.0% │ - ik to sK
│ じむしょ │      8,926 │  0.1% │
│ じムしょ │          0 │  0.0% │ - drop
╰─ーーーー─┴────────────┴───────╯

Visited this entry because I saw ム所, but it was being used as an abbreviation of 刑務所

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<re_restr>事務所</re_restr>
@@ -20,4 +18,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>じムしょ</reb>
-<re_restr>事ム所</re_restr>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<re_restr>事務所</re_restr>

gg5, prog, daij

@@ -24,7 +24,4 @@
-<gloss>basis</gloss>
-<gloss>based on</gloss>
-<gloss>conformance</gloss>
-<gloss>conformity</gloss>
-<gloss>authority (of)</gloss>
-<gloss>standard</gloss>
-<gloss>reference</gloss>
+<gloss>being based on</gloss>
+<gloss>following (a rule, guidelines, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>conforming to (standards, regulations, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>complying with</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/準拠・准拠-2049507
じゅん‐きょ【準拠・准拠】
〘名〙 あるものをよりどころとしてそれに従うこと。また、そのよりどころ。

准拠	358	0.0%
準拠	813301	100.0%

This was specifically given as an example term for the kanji here, or I would have never noticed or cared. 
https://www.kanjipedia.jp/kanji/0003252100/
 ③よる。「准拠」

Plenty of book results, even some google hits (probably about old books). Maybe an obsolete form.

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>准拠</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/旧制小学校

I think it's more hist than dated.

@@ -15,3 +15,2 @@
-<misc>&dated;</misc>
-<gloss>assistant teacher (in the old system of elementary schools)</gloss>
-<gloss>junior teacher</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>assistant teacher (at an elementary school; 1886-1946)</gloss>

The term itself is still dated.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&dated;</misc>

daijr/s, nikk

@@ -15,2 +15 @@
-<misc>&dated;</misc>
-<gloss>assistant teacher (elementary school)</gloss>
+<gloss>assistant teacher (in the old system of elementary schools)</gloss>

More dated than rare.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>

Aligning with the other 3 radical glosses.

@@ -48 +48 @@
-<gloss>bottom structural component (i.e. radical) of a kanji</gloss>
+<gloss>lower radical of a kanji</gloss>

meikyo: 《多く「お━」の形で》ぜに。→お足

@@ -34 +34 @@
-<s_inf>esp. 脚,肢</s_inf>
+<s_inf>esp. 脚, 肢</s_inf>
@@ -59 +59,2 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu お〜</s_inf>

RP has "weakness".

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>partiality (liking)</gloss>
+<gloss>partiality (to something)</gloss>
+<gloss>liking</gloss>

not bias

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>partiality</gloss>
+<gloss>partiality (liking)</gloss>

GG5, etc.

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>leeway</gloss>
+<gloss>windage</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>drift</gloss>
+<gloss>drift (of an airplane or boat, etc.)</gloss>

OK

It shouldn't be tagged as both transitive and intransitive. It's one or the other depending on how you define transitivity in Japanese.
Given that this always takes を (unlike 歩く, for example), I think it's easier to make a case for vt.

@@ -18,4 +18,2 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>walking through (a difficult and long path)</gloss>
-<gloss>travelling (the full distance) on foot</gloss>
-<gloss>travelling (all the way) across</gloss>
+<gloss>travelling (a long and difficult journey) on foot</gloss>
+<gloss>walking (all the way) across</gloss>
@@ -30 +27,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>

sorry didn't read the old comments
i think the new gloss is definitely useful, not sure about the transitive/intransitive discussion

sankoku, daijr/s, smk, obunsha, senkoku

i don't think the second sense is needed
the majority of kokugos say it's transitive

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>walking through (a difficult and long path)</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +29 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Comments on 講ずる

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2672120">措置を講じる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2672120">措置を講じる</xref>
@@ -19,2 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>to take measures</gloss>
-<gloss>to work out a plan</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (e.g. measures)</gloss>
+<gloss>to work out (e.g. a plan)</gloss>

@@ -17,2 +17,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1631450">講ずる</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1631450">講ずる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1631450">講ずる・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1631450">講ずる・1</xref>
@@ -25,0 +25,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1631450">講ずる・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1631450">講ずる・2</xref>
@@ -31,0 +33,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1631450">講ずる・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1631450">講ずる・3</xref>

Actually I don't think those xrefs are needed.

@@ -17,2 +16,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2859209">措置を講ずる</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1878730">策を講ずる</xref>

講じる	288896
講ずる	403279
措置を講ずる	273344	28.3%

The direct-objects appear to be essentially non-optional.

講じる is less common than 講ずる, though I guess they are both common enough that a circular reference is fine...

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2859209">措置を講ずる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1878730">策を講ずる</xref>
@@ -18,2 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>to take measures</gloss>
-<gloss>to work out a plan</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (e.g. measures)</gloss>
+<gloss>to work out (e.g. a plan)</gloss>

@@ -17,1 +17,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1631440">講じる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1631440">講じる・1</xref>
@@ -24,0 +24,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1631440">講じる・2</xref>
@@ -30,0 +31,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1631440">講じる・3</xref>

Best dropped.

微々たる is the one -たる adjective I hear all the time in casual conversation. I don't thk iit should be tagged [form].

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<misc>&form;</misc>

yeah i know, it's just that "微々" is often in the taru form anyway
i guess it's not technically correct as "微々と" is not "form" but i'm not sure there's anyway to make the difference clear without notes

daijirin: ［文］形動タリ
obunsha: 〔文〕（形動タリ）

The 文 symbol in in daijirin and obunsha is just used to precede information about the 文語形 inflections of a word.
The don't mean the same thing as the 文 tag in sankoku (=文章語).

Sankoku tends to overuse its 文章語 tag compared to meikyo and shinsen, but [form] might be okay here anyway.

The kokugos define it as a liquid.
むしづ is old kana orthography. We don't use [ok] for this.

@@ -16,5 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>むしづ</reb>
-<re_restr>虫唾</re_restr>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
@@ -24 +19 @@
-<gloss>strong sense of revulsion (from acid reflux)</gloss>
+<gloss>stomach acid that flows backwards into the mouth (due to acid reflux)</gloss>

sankoku, daijr/s, smk, meikyo

@@ -15,0 +16,5 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>むしづ</reb>
+<re_restr>虫唾</re_restr>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -19,5 +24 @@
-<gloss>heartburn</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>strong sense of disgust</gloss>
+<gloss>strong sense of revulsion (from acid reflux)</gloss>

GG5, etc.

直線	610733	43.2%
一直線に	187267	13.2%
直線距離	616604	43.6%

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/as+the+crow+flies
研究社 新英和中辞典での「as the crow flies」の意味
as the crow flies
一直線に, 直線距離で(は).
The place is about ten miles from here as the crow flies. その場所はここから直線距離で約10マイルだ

eijiro has it eventually, somewhere below the funny (to me) "crow-fly distance".
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=直線距離

So many of these translations are practically *begging* for "as the crow flies" as a natural translation (mostly have the straight-line distance gloss)
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/直線距離

A few knew about the crow:
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/直線距離#crow+flies

Seemed like an obvious gloss. Looks like this is used for map distances.

Google the pair:
"直線距離" "as the crow flies"

and you'll get plenty of hits.

Seems this in some ways applies to 一直線 as well, which we have, but that's a bit more complicated (needs に)

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>distance as the crow flies</gloss>

GG5: 	medals for merit.
中辞典: 	(the class of) an order.
ルミナス: the order of merit.

The JEs are a bit all over the place. I think the sense split works. Trimming a bit.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>an order of merit</gloss>
+<gloss>(an) order of merit</gloss>
@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1247200">勲一等</xref>
@@ -20,2 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>order (of medal, decoration, etc. i.e. first order, second order, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>class number (first class, second class, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>order (first, second, etc. of a medal or decoration)</gloss>
+<gloss>class number (first, second, etc.)</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/jeword/勲等
progressive: "an order of merit

Wikipedia identifies "勲等" as the class number here:
In the system before the 2003 revision, titles consisted of two parts, the class number (kuntō [ja]) and the decoration. For example:
勲一等旭日桐花大綬章 (literally: 1st Class, Grand Cordon of the Order of the Rising Sun, Paulownia Flowers)[16]
勲一等旭日大綬章 (literally: 1st Class, Grand Cordon of the Order of the Rising Sun)[16]
勲二等旭日重光章 (literally: 2nd Class, The Order of the Rising Sun, Gold and Silver Star)[16]



Meritocracy and Its Discontents:
Long-run Effects of Repeated School Admission Reforms
Mari Tanaka Yusuke Narita Chiaki Moriguchi∗
November 30, 2021
https://ies.keio.ac.jp/upload/20221014appliedpaper.pdf
In the pre-WWII Japanese honor system, the the medals for merit (kuntou in Japanese)
and the court ranks (ikai in Japanese) were conferred on individuals in recognition of their
exceptional public service or distinguished merit. The medals consisted of 8 grades from the
first order of merit (the highest honor) to the eighth order of merit (the lowest honor), and
the court ranks consisted of 16 ranks from senior first rank (the highest rank) to junior eighth
rank (the lowest rank). According to Ogawa (2009), the highest honors are given mostly
to public servants (such as top-ranking military officers, bureaucrats, and politicians), while
individuals in a private sector (such as top corporate executives) receive the fourth order
of merit and below. Given this, we define prestigious medal recipients as those who receive
at least the fifth order of merit (kungotou in Japanese) or the junior fifth rank (jugoi in
Japanese) .

I believe the numbered system identified by [1] has essentially been replaced. If you look here, you'll see an alignment between 勲等 system and modern naming:
https://kotobank.jp/word/勲等

reverso has a lot of "medals for merit".  Not sure how I feel about this, but it is the translation used by a scholarly (prepublication, don't know what for) Japanese paper from Keio.

The wikipedia xref is to the whole system of Japanese honors. progressive (book result) says "an order of merit", which was my initial thought.  Big difference between "an order of merit" and "the order of merit". sankoku's definition still seems correct, which would be sense[2].  Even this usage seems to have been deprecated in recent years, with the classes/orders being completely dropped.

@@ -11,0 +12,6 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1155420">位階勲等</xref>
+<gloss>an order of merit</gloss>
+<gloss>medals for merit</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -14 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>order (of medal, decoration, etc. i.e. first order, second order, ...)</gloss>
+<gloss>order (of medal, decoration, etc. i.e. first order, second order, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>class number (first class, second class, etc.)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/勲等

Ok, I got ahead of myself. Possibly wrong, possibly both?  I will update again in a bit...
I started this edit because the wikipedia xref was (formerly anyway) "Orders, decorations, and medals of Japan".  sankoku's gloss matched what I was reading on some other honors.

勲等	3586	16.9%
勲一等	10213	48.1%
勲二等	3401	16.0%
勲三等	4036	19.0%

勲一等、　勲二等、　勲三等、first, second, third order...

This isn't "The Order of Merit", it is "the order of the merit". 

sankoku: 勲章の等級

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>the Order of Merit</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1247200">勲一等</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1247240">勲章</xref>
+<gloss>order (of medal, decoration, etc. i.e. first order, second order, ...)</gloss>

GG5, etc.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>to work diligently</gloss>
+<gloss>to be diligent</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>to exert oneself</gloss>

精を出す	66763	87.5%
精出す	5570	7.3%

精を出し	117354	91.9%
精出し	10332	8.1%


精が出る	3976	5.2%

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=精を出す
break [bust] one's ass [balls, butt, chops]〈米・卑俗〉〔【同】work one's ass off〕
bust one's tail [conk, guts, hump]
exert oneself
slog away [on]
toil on
work hard

他動
hustle（～に）
ply（仕事などに）
句動
buckle down（仕事などに）
knuckle down

Looking at eijiro, maybe there are some other glosses we could add(and "exert oneself" was probably fine). Just aligning for now.

精を出す is barely on reverso in dictionary form, but plenty as 精を出して
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/精を出して

@@ -13 +13,5 @@
-<gloss>to exert oneself</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1888080">精を出す</xref>
+<gloss>to work hard</gloss>
+<gloss>to work diligently</gloss>
+<gloss>to do one's best</gloss>
+<gloss>to try one's hardest</gloss>

Rene used to call these "18nnnnnn" entries "the danger range".

A full-text search of my refs only gets 1 hit: daijisen's entry for 内職 (second sense).

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ 家計の足し │ 9,480 │
│ 家計の助け │ 2,717 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────╯

Not even a particularly common collocation.

Not sure why this was added.

家計の助け	2717	100.0%
家計の扶け	0	0.0%

We deleted 扶け起こす rather than merge it with 助け起こす, and it actually had ngrams.

There are zero book results for "家計の扶け".  Google search returns this dictionary and its derivatives.  I think dropping it is better than [rK].

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>家計の扶け</keb>

准看護婦	17260	10.0%
准看護師	155593	90.0%

(for anyone stumbling by, see: 看護婦).

@@ -15,0 +16,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2847783">准看護師</xref>
+<s_inf>now deprecated</s_inf>
+<gloss>(female) assistant nurse</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1280090">甲乙丙・こうおつへい</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1280090">甲乙丙</xref>

GG5, ルミナス

I'd say adj-no. 丙種危険 is the only compound more common.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>third grade</gloss>
+<gloss>third class</gloss>
@@ -14 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>third-class</gloss>

Top 10 N-grams Lookup for 丙種 (Frequency Order)
丙種	11013	  
丙種危険	2338	  
丙種危険物	2318	  
丙種危険物取扱	1878	  
丙種危険物取扱者	1802	  
丙種の	828	  
丙種化学	770	  
丙種は	616	  
丙種合格	479	  
丙種火薬	358	  
丙種火薬類	353

adj-no? adj-f? or change glosses to nouns?

Standardizing.

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>class C</gloss>
-<gloss>third class</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1280090">甲乙丙・こうおつへい</xref>
+<gloss>C-grade</gloss>
+<gloss>third-class</gloss>

Fork

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1510310">偏</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1567860">旁</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1577620">冠・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1404630">脚・5</xref>
@@ -13 +17 @@
-<gloss>the radicals</gloss>
+<gloss>structural components of kanji (left-hand, right-hand, top, and bottom)</gloss>

not a great entrt, but not sure how to improve it

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

I'm OK with this.

I prefer "components". I think most linguists and kanji enthusiasts would still insist on using the original, narrower sense of "radical". I've been corrected in the past for using "radical" to refer to any kanji component.

@@ -12,4 +12,4 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1510310">偏・へん</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1567860">旁・つくり</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1577620">冠・かんむり・3</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1404630">足・あし・5</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1510310">偏</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1567860">旁</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1577620">冠・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1404630">足・5</xref>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_kanji_radicals_by_frequency
"As dictionaries have moved from textbooks to interactive screens, the term "radicals" seems to now be used for any kanji component used in a visual search."

I'm not really fussed about calling them radicals either. The narrower sense of the word isn't as relevant in the digital age.

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>kanji components (left, right, crown and lower)</gloss>
+<gloss>radicals of a kanji (left, right, crown and lower)</gloss>
+<gloss>kanji components</gloss>

This interesting note is in shinsen's entry for 部首:
「氵（さんずい）」や「⺾（くさかんむり）」などの偏旁冠脚(へんぼうかんきゃく)を部首というのは、本来は誤り。

In their entries for 偏旁冠脚, most of the refs refer to the components as 構成部分 rather than radicals (部首).
  shinsen:     漢字の構成部分の総称。
  daijirin:    漢字の構成部分として…
  smk yoji:    漢字を構成する部分の名称。
  gakken yoji: 漢字を構成する部分。

koj uses both "構成要素" and "部首."
  漢字の代表的な構成要素である、…　漢字の部首の総称。

Most of the refs also mention that 偏旁冠脚 can, in a broad sense of the word, refer to other structural components.
  1370860・垂れ・たれ[4] "kanji radical enclosing the top-left corner of a character"
  1279690・構え・かまえ[4] "kanji enclosure type radical (must enclose at least two sides of the kanji)"
  2175530・繞・にょう[1] "kanji radical that runs from the left to the bottom part of the kanji"

Strictly speaking, the components aren't necessarily radicals. But it sounds like even native speakers sometimes use them interchangeably.

It might be less confusing to refer to them as "components" or something rather than radicals.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>the four radicals of a kanji (left, right, crown and lower)</gloss>
+<gloss>kanji components (left, right, crown and lower)</gloss>

ルミナス: the four elements of a Chinese character; (説明的には) the left hand radical, the right hand radical, the crown and the lower part of a Chinese character.
偏旁冠脚	361

Maybe this works.

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1510310">偏・へん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1567860">旁・つくり</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1577620">冠・かんむり・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1404630">足・あし・5</xref>
@@ -13 +17 @@
-<gloss>the radicals</gloss>
+<gloss>the four radicals of a kanji (left, right, crown and lower)</gloss>

iwakoku (entry for てい【亭】)
  文人・芸人などの号につける語。「二葉亭・三遊亭」

This is 若竹 (surname / stage name) + 亭 (sense 2 of our entry). 
Very rare and not mentioned in the usual refs.
I think it's okay to drop.

Remains (with placard) of one possible 若竹亭 
https://asakusasanpo.hatenablog.com/entry/2020/08/26/045832

A different 若竹? (Notably, 若竹亭 doesn't appear in the article)
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/若竹


若竹亭	59

This is an odd duck.

Was going to say to move to names dict.  But it's a bit of a challenge to figure out what it specifically was.  

Maybe some historic connection to 寄席 ("Vaudeville Theatre", hence "Variety Theatre"?)  Maybe in a period text from the turn of the last century this could have been mentioned without explanation? I guess this would be useful in such a case.  I wonder how this entry came to be...

We don't have an entry for 若竹. daijs has a definition: bamboo newly sprouted in the current year :)  Image search suggests this might actually be worth an entry.
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/若竹/

虫唾が走る	14,843	65.5%	
虫酸が走る	6,211	27.4%	
虫ずが走る	911	4.0%	
むしずが走る	708	3.1%

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,0 +24 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

E-DIC
KM n-grams:
虫唾が走る	446
虫酸が走る	376
虫ずが走る	75
むしずが走る	36

This expression stands on its own (e.g. 顔を見ただけで虫唾が走る).
It's not used with nouns as the original glosses suggested.

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>むしずが走る</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -19,2 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>to be disgusted with</gloss>
-<gloss>to loathe</gloss>
+<gloss>to be disgusted</gloss>
+<gloss>to be repulsed</gloss>
+<gloss>to get the creeps</gloss>

@@ -19,1 +19,1 @@
-<gloss>to be disgusted with (wouldn't touch with a pair of tongs)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be disgusted with</gloss>

GG5 only has "sex toy".

性具	2293	2.7%
淫具	1079	1.3%

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/性具
性具（せいぐ）は性的快感を増幅し、性的欲望を十分に満たす目的で使用される道具である。女性用・男性用のほか様々な形態、使用法のものがある。淫具（いんぐ）、大人のおもちゃ（おとなのおもちゃ）とも呼ばれる。

https://www.diqt.net/ja/dictionaries/7/search?keyword=私(わたし)に敵(てき)対(たい)すること以(い)上(じょう)の愚(ぐ)行(こう)もあるまい。&page=15

https://www.diqt.net/ja/dictionaries/7/search?keyword=淫具
彼女は淫具の使用方法を知らなかった。
She didn't know how to use the sex toy.

Previous gloss seems to be under-generalized.  Given the kanji difference, would not gloss as "sex aid".

Image search will confirm that it as, at least, not obviously the old gloss.

Ah, after a lot of searching, I see wiktionary has this sorted.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/淫具
Noun
淫具 • (ingu) 
    Synonym of 性具

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>dildo</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2116750">性具</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2116750">性具</xref>
+<gloss>sex toy</gloss>

rK tags aren't needed on arch entries.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,2 +18,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1344410">助ける・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1344410">助ける・2</xref>

daijr/s, koj

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&v2k-s;</pos>

Koj, etc.

I think the approach is over the top. Cutting it back to the kokugo forms.

@@ -8,5 +8 @@
-<keb>援く</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>救く</keb>
+<keb>輔く</keb>
@@ -17,12 +12,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>佐く</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>佑く</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>輔く</keb>

助ける	1432784

助く	38752	97.6%  (2.6% of 助ける + 助く)
輔く	150	0.4%
扶く	171	0.4%
援く	108	0.3%
救く	123	0.3%
佐く	204	0.5%
佑く	213	0.5%

日本語 に関する質問
助ける と 助く はどう違いますか？説明が難しい場合は、例文を教えて下さい。
https://ja.hinative.com/questions/13708877
助ける」は、現代の言葉です。
「助く」は文語、あるいは古語です。

not in sankoku.

just grabbed all the kanji forms from 助ける.  Listed them in identical order, they are all similar-ish in the ngrams anyway, might as well be consistent.

Seems like "the kind of arch Japanese people might be familiar with from books".  Since it's not in sankoku, [arch] seems preferable to [form] to me. Not likely to cause much harm.

@@ -8 +8,6 @@
-<keb>輔く</keb>
+<keb>援く</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>救く</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +17,13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>佐く</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>佑く</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>輔く</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19,0 +38,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1344410">助ける・2</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

KOD

I don't see the need for that xref.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2859238">大人のおもちゃ</xref>

xref is wildly more common (stats at xref)

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2859238">大人のおもちゃ</xref>

Entry created

OK

By analogy with the other 6 〜旁 entries in jmdict, I think the kanji form here would be 寸旁

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬───╮
│ 寸旁 │ 0 │
│ 彡旁 │ 0 │
│ 戈旁 │ 0 │
│ 斧旁 │ 0 │
│ 殳旁 │ 0 │
│ 節旁 │ 0 │
│ 聿旁 │ 0 │
╰─ーー─┴───╯

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>寸旁</keb>
+</k_ele>

Entry created

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ いけしゃあしゃあ │ 12,166 │ 95.8% │
│ いけしゃあしゃ　 │     56 │  0.4% │
│ イケしゃあしゃあ │     55 │  0.4% │
│ イケシャアシャア │    419 │  3.3% │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>イケシャアシャア</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>イケしゃあしゃあ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

http://www.practical-japanese.com/2011/06/blog-post_7917.html

Merging in いけしゃあしゃあ.

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>いけしゃあしゃあ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>

Entry created

みての通り	3500

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>みての通り</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +19,2 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>in accordance with what you see</gloss>

We don't have a hard rule on this but we're 
usually only adding spec1 to words/expressions 
that have at least 1m hits in the 2007 ngrams.

Goog
見ての通り	169282
見てのとおり	61544
みてのとおり	4749

KM
見ての通り	5240
見てのとおり	2830
みてのとおり	153

I'm a little surprised at the n-gram counts for this. Also comes up seemingly on an average of every two or three minutes on Twitter. Worthy of a [spec] tag?

GG5

併合用ファイル	46	23.1%
マージファイル	153	76.9%

Entry created

Just noticed this had an example sentence. Reindexed to 社会奉仕.

GG5 has it but I don't think it's needed. Rare A+B compound.

社会奉仕	56712	99.8%
社会奉仕家	107	0.2%

https://volosyokugyo.com/tokusika/#gsc.tab=0
社会奉仕家
社会奉仕家とは、見返りを求めずに行う労働する人です。
奉仕には、国や社会、目上の人につくすという意味があります。
そのため、奉仕活動は、見返りを求めずに行う労働を指します。

google trans(Note google also has "social worker" stuck to this term): 
A social worker is someone who performs labor without expecting anything in return. Service has the meaning of serving one's country, society, or superiors. Therefore, acts of service refer to labor performed without expecting anything in return.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/北原怜子
キリスト教の教義に基づき献身的な活動を展開した社会奉仕家である。 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoko_Kitahara
Satoko Kitahara (北原 怜子, Kitahara Satoko, 22 August 1929 – 23 January 1958) – later known as Elisabeth Maria Kitahara – was a Japanese Roman Catholic
Kitahara made it her goal to tend to the impoverished and orphaned as well as the sick and poor who were suffering as a result of the damage inflicted during the war.  In 1950 she first met the Conventual Franciscan friar Zenon Żebrowski and the two worked together to care for destitute people and children in the riverside Ants Village. This work became the focus for Kitahara's life until she died from tuberculosis in 1958.[4][5]

"social worker" has a pretty strong nuance in the U.S. that differs from what this is.  In particular, "social worker" is a profession for which one is duly paid.  It is not a question of self-sacrifice or volunteer work.

Rather than [see="more appropriate term for social worker"], I think this gloss should just be something else.

What would be the stereotypical description of Mother Theresa? (setting aside controversy).  Someone who dedicates their life to serving those in need.  That's what this term seems to be. If you google it, you get a Japanese Roman Catholic woman's wikipedia entry, described as a "社会奉仕家" in the intro(in fact, you'll get several different websites referring to this one woman).  No such simple gloss exists on the English side to compare to.

If you search reverso, it seems likely that the one "social worker" entry is E->J, probably plucked from here.

eijiro:
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=社会奉仕家
"servant of the public"

A little too close to "public servant" for me, which is again quite different.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>social worker</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1937400">社会奉仕</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>someone who dedicates themselves to social service</gloss>

Entry created

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_isomer#Decay_processes
  "An isomeric transition or internal transition (IT) is the decay of a nuclear isomer to a lower-energy nuclear state."

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&physics;</field>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>nuclear isomer decay</gloss>

It seems the reading was wrong for 性 (せい).

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>かくいせたいてんい</reb>
+<reb>かくいせいたいてんい</reb>

wiki, jst, cross, 機械工学英和和英辞典, 日英・英日専門用語辞書
http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/核異性�%B
D%93%E8%BB%A2%E7%A7%BB
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/核異性�
%93%E8%BB%A2%E7%A7%BB

Seems a little clumsy, but I guess distinguishing from 精を出す is useful.

精が出	5968	  
精が出る	3976	  
精が出ます	3225	

精を出し	117354	91.9%
精出し	10332	8.1%

https://www.weblio.jp/content/精が出る
精が出る:懸命に働く。仕事に励む。よく活動する。「朝早くから—◦出ますね」
精を出す：精いっぱい働く。こつこつ物事をする。「仕事に—・す」


仕事にも精が出る
https://ja.hinative.com/questions/21523148
@benkyou47 If it is to be used in place of "頑張ろう！(ganbarou!)," it needs to be changed to "精を出そう(seiodasou)“

精が出るの意味・語源・例文！敬語だとどうなる？
https://kotobaryoku.com/archives/1456

A nice little discussion just on "精が出ますね"
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1485424244


性が出なかった
https://shukatsu-venture.com/article/306479
このとき、いくつかサークルを転々としてみたけれどあまり馴染めなかった、志望動機も曖昧なまま入学してしまい勉学に精が出なかったなどのネガティブな理由ではいけません。

There's a sort of logical observation here that I think is correct. を出す is to deliberately do something (see the hinative suggestion that 頑張ろう = 精を出そう). 精が出る is an observation in the moment, or after-the-fact. The dictionary examples are all "to a worker in a field", or some such:  精が出ますね "you sure are doing great work today!"

I get the strong impression that this is used as an observation of someone else's performance: "he's really giving it his all today isn't he", "you're really doing exceptional work today", that sort of thing...

As such, I don't think the glosses should match 精を出す.　 You can say　精を出そう, or 精を出すつもり, but there is no way to do this with 精が出る.
精を出すつもり	405	9.5%
精を出そう	3872	90.5%

精が出ますね is potentially an [exp] on its own:
御精が出ますね	66	3.6%
ご精が出ますね	324	17.8%
精が出ますね	1435	78.6%

This is an interesting one.
精が出ない	246	100.0%
粋を出さない	0	0.0%

精が出ない: (a commentary on their own condition)
https://ameblo.jp/spiral-jump/entry-12572684621.html

This is a bit like 元気が出る、元気が出ない.  This might be a legitimate construction(both halves exist, but I made this up):
精を出そうとしても、精が出なかった。

Certainly the negation is a bit more nuanced than "wasn't working hard".  More like "couldn't do my best", "didn't have the willpower to focus on work". hmm

@@ -13,2 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>to work hard</gloss>
-<gloss>to make an effort</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1888080">精を出す</xref>
+<gloss>to be working hard</gloss>
+<gloss>to be doing one's best</gloss>

daij, Luminous

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2423140">零余子</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2423140">むかご</xref>

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2423140">零余子・むかご</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2423140">零余子</xref>
+<field>&food;</field>

"with with" -> "with"

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>cooked rice with with yam bulblets</gloss>
+<gloss>cooked rice with yam bulblets</gloss>

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2423140">零余子・むかご</xref>

gg5, prog, luminous, wisdom, daij
キャーキャー	157,842		
キャッキャ	63,123		
キャッキャッ	35,734		
きゃあきゃあ	21,683		
きゃっきゃ	15,800		
きゃっきゃっ	9,386

Not a noun.
Only koj and nikk have きゃあきゃあ for sense 2.

@@ -5 +5,10 @@
-<reb>きゃっきゃっ</reb>
+<reb>キャーキャー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>きゃあきゃあ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キャッキャ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>きゃっきゃ</reb>
@@ -11,10 +20 @@
-<reb>きゃあきゃあ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>キャーキャー</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>きゃっきゃ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>キャッキャ</reb>
+<reb>きゃっきゃっ</reb>
@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -26,3 +26,6 @@
-<gloss>chitter</gloss>
-<gloss>chatter</gloss>
-<gloss>giggle</gloss>
+<gloss>shrieking</gloss>
+<gloss>squealing</gloss>
+<gloss>screeching</gloss>
+<gloss>screaming</gloss>
+<gloss>shouting</gloss>
+<gloss>cackling</gloss>
@@ -31 +33,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -32,0 +35 @@
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -34,2 +37,2 @@
-<gloss>screeching</gloss>
-<gloss>squealing</gloss>
+<gloss>chattering (e.g. of a monkey)</gloss>
+<gloss>chittering</gloss>

I see KOD EJ associates キャーキャー with screaming.

きゃっきゃっ	9386	3.1%
キャッキャッ	35734	11.8%
きゃあきゃあ	21683	7.1%
キャーキャー	157842	52.0%
きゃっきゃ	15800	5.2%
キャッキャ	63123	20.8%

Not sure キャッキャ and キャーキャー belong together?

Not on the dialect list.

@@ -29 +28,0 @@
-<dial>&std;</dial>

smk: 東京方言
sankoku and obunsha have [col] tags.

〈素っ／すっ／スッ〉〈惚／恍／とぼ〉け

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 素っ惚け　 │     52 │  0.1% │ - rK (meikyo, koj, daijs)
│ 素っ恍け　 │     25 │  0.1% │ - rK (daijr)
│ 素っとぼけ │    135 │  0.3% │ - sK
│ すっ惚け　 │     84 │  0.2% │ - sK
│ スッ惚け　 │     34 │  0.1% │
│ すっとぼけ │ 41,464 │ 97.5% │
│ スッとぼけ │    723 │  1.7% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17 +18 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -25 +26 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1610900">とぼける</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1610900">とぼける・1</xref>
@@ -27,2 +28,2 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
-<s_inf>Tokyo dialect</s_inf>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<dial>&std;</dial>

smk, sankoku, meikyo

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ すっとぼけた │ 18,975 │ 99.3% │
│ 素っ惚けた　 │     26 │  0.1% │
│ 素っ恍けた　 │      0 │  0.0% │
│ 素っとぼけた │     69 │  0.4% │
│ すっ惚けた　 │     35 │  0.2% │
│ すっ恍けた　 │      0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>素っとぼける</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>すっ惚ける</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +26,3 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<s_inf>Tokyo dialect</s_inf>

Eijiro

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>to pretend one doesn't know</gloss>

Let's do that.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,5 +12,0 @@
-<re_restr>自己愛性パーソナリティ障害</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>じこあいせいパーソナリティーしょうがい</reb>
-<re_restr>自己愛性パーソナリティー障害</re_restr>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/自己愛性パーソナリティ障害
Daijisen has the rarer form with two chōonpu. We could hide it anyway.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーーーーーーー─┬─────────╮
│ パーソナリティ障害　　　　　 │  24,025 │
│ パーソナリティー障害　　　　 │   1,105 │
├─ーーーーーーーーーーーーーー─┼─────────┤
│ 自己愛性パーソナリティ　　　 │     628 │
│ 自己愛性パーソナリティー　　 │      67 │
├─ーーーーーーーーーーーーーー─┼─────────┤
│ 自己愛性パーソナリティ障害　 │       0 │ - wiki
│ 自己愛性パーソナリティー障害 │       0 │ - daijs
╰─ーーーーーーーーーーーーーー─┴─────────╯

There was an extra ー (chōonpu) in the reading. From what I can find, it appears both forms can be used.

@@ -6,0 +7,7 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>自己愛性パーソナリティー障害</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>じこあいせいパーソナリティしょうがい</reb>
+<re_restr>自己愛性パーソナリティ障害</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +16 @@
+<re_restr>自己愛性パーソナリティー障害</re_restr>

I think so.

daijs wiki

med ok for personality disorders?

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<field>&Christn;</field>

daij

daijisen: 「不機嫌そうに―（と）歩く」

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬─────╮
│ ドスドス歩い　 │ 516 │
│ ドスドスと歩い │ 139 │
├─ーーーーーーー─┼─────┤
│ ドスドス音を　 │ 101 │
│ ドスドスと音を │ 149 │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴─────╯

と seems optional.

there is no such thing as [adv-to,vs], there is only [adv,adv-to,vs]
the fact that it is [vs] makes it automatically [adv], because you cannot attach する to non-adverbs without a particle

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

ドスドスと	3721
ドスドスに	34

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>

daijs

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ ドスドス │ 13,190 │ 63.2% │
│ どすどす │  7,683 │ 36.8% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 打ち抜く │ 19,602 │ 53.6% │
│ ぶち抜く │ 13,867 │ 37.9% │
│ ブチ抜く │  3,105 │  8.5% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ブチ抜く</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Thanks

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>to dig though</gloss>
+<gloss>to dig through</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>to remove (partitions between rooms)</gloss>
@@ -26 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>to remove (a partition)</gloss>
@@ -31 +31 @@
-<gloss>to carry out to completion</gloss>
+<gloss>to carry out (to completion)</gloss>

sankoku, n-grams

Quite common. Surprised it's not in other refs.

@@ -13,3 +13 @@
-<gloss>suddenly falling down</gloss>
-<gloss>lying idle</gloss>
-<gloss>dying</gloss>
+<gloss>suddenly (fall asleep, fall over, die)</gloss>

sankoku

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ コテンと │ 9,256 │ 79.6% │
│ こてんと │ 2,374 │ 20.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

Prob ok as the third gloss? I think it often fits well.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>bungled preparations (e.g. bookings)</gloss>
+<gloss>bungled preparations</gloss>
+<gloss>booking mistake</gloss>

Making it a bit more general.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>booking mistake</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>bungled preparations (e.g. bookings)</gloss>

手配ミス	8432
eij has 
手配のミスをする
mess up the arrangements

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/d4945d975053f06fe66901bb18cd10d42eb3f63c
『埼玉・バス手配ミスを隠すため小学校を脅迫した疑いの会社員・沢野美紀容疑者（51）は2人の子を持つママ、夫は直撃に「わからない」困惑して懺悔』



https://ja.hinative.com/questions/1536953
best answer: "ちょっと変ですが、"an organizing error"や"an error with the arrangements"ではその意味を伝えます。"



https://www.asahi.com/sp/articles/ASR57455PR57UTQP011.html
Jリーグによると、VARの手配はリーグが一括で担い、業者に各会場への手配を委託している。7日朝、委託先から、VARに必要な機材を積んだ車両が新潟へ向けて手配できていなかったと連絡があったという。

Not entirely obvious from 手配 (though arguably we could update that entry)
attwmpts to translate it often end up too literal

OK, esp. since it's not the leading sense of 王道.

As it's quite common and limited to one sense of 王道, I'm inclined to let this one through.

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>orthodox</gloss>
+<gloss>proper</gloss>

Said "euphemistic", meant "idiomatic". Sorry about that.

This term is euphemistic("royal road").  One would never guess from 王道 that there was a 的 form, and one would never guess that 王道的 is limited specifically to sense[3] of 王道. If you see 王道的 in a text, you'll have to puzzle about which sense it is. 34608 ngrams seems common enough to me that this clarity would be useful.

王道	1187338
王道的	34608

You can append 的 to a vast number of terms. We don't usually include XX的 compounds unless there is a good reason. This one doesn't really seem needed.

Glosses should align with the first PoS (or the 2nd one in most cases where the first one is exp). We're not great at adhering to this when it comes to on-mim adv so you'll find many exceptions, though.

(I haven't checked the sources/validity of the entry)

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>spinning around</gloss>
-<gloss>revolving</gloss>
+<gloss>(spinning) around</gloss>
+<gloss>while revolving</gloss>
@@ -21,3 +21,3 @@
-<gloss>being curly</gloss>
-<gloss>whirling</gloss>
-<gloss>coiling around</gloss>
+<gloss>with a curl</gloss>
+<gloss>with a whirl</gloss>
+<gloss>(coiling) around</gloss>

http://sura-sura.com/archives/1777.html
https://engoo.jp/app/words/word/curly/0llDT85PSkOBS1nO_hkbgA

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ くるんと │ 36,042 │ 70.4% │
│ クルンと │ 15,163 │ 29.6% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

not op, but it's very common, probably a variation of "くるくる" (maybe a xref is needed?)
seems to be used mostly for "curly hair" or the movements of someone "spinning around"

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クルン</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,2 +11,13 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>???</gloss>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>spinning around</gloss>
+<gloss>revolving</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>being curly</gloss>
+<gloss>whirling</gloss>
+<gloss>coiling around</gloss>

Unidic: くるん (動詞,一般,*,*,五段-マ行,連用形-撥音便) Base: 包む : くるむ

Resubmit, with details of where it was encountered, etc.

Reverso

陣 can be added to many things, but this one seems surisingly common.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>instructors</gloss>

講師陣	198600
Hear it a lot at work.

Xref not needed.

@@ -19,2 +18,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2116750">性具</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2116750">性具</xref>

Not sure it's needed.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/性具
性具（せいぐ）は性的快感を増幅し、性的欲望を十分に満たす目的で使用される道具である。女性用・男性用のほか様々な形態、使用法のものがある。淫具（いんぐ）、大人のおもちゃ（おとなのおもちゃ）とも呼ばれる。

性具	2293	2.7%
淫具	1079	1.3%
大人のおもちゃ	66860	79.6%
大人の玩具	5471	6.5%
大人のオモチャ	8294	9.9%

大人のおもちゃ屋	1509

We already have 大人のおもちゃ屋, but not this.

大人の玩具, with kanji, seems less likely to be used for this purpose, and possibly more likely to be used as "a toy for a adults", but anyway...

Reverso

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

https://www.tokaitokyo.co.jp/kantan/term/detail_1897.html

未上場	24873

Reverso

Need to be wary of 〜化 entries, but I think this is OK.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>fixation</gloss>

https://www.linguee.jp/日本語-英語/翻訳/定着化.html

定着化	30099

〈土／つち／ツチ〉が〈付／つ〉く

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 土がつく │   779 │ 57.4% │ - add
│ 土が付く │   579 │ 42.6% │
├─ーーーー─┼───────┼───────┤
│ 土がつい │ 7,843 │ 63.0% │
│ 土が付い │ 4,614 │ 37.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>土がつく</keb>
+</k_ele>

中辞典 flags it as sumo.

I think the tag can stay.

sankoku, daijr/s, meikyo

it's not used exclusively for sumo, maybe the field should be converted to a note

通快	8305

https://marche.kipputotetsukomono.com/items/70698570

版ズレ	1478	67.5%
版ずれ	713	32.5%
http://printwiki.org/Misregister

daijirin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Diary_of_Lady_Murasaki

Thanks.

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
-<gloss>the Diary of Murasaki Shikibu</gloss>
+<misc>&work;</misc>
+<gloss>The Diary of Lady Murasaki (c. 1010)</gloss>

For some reason the reading for "diary" was left out.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>むらさきしきぶ</reb>
+<reb>むらさきしきぶにっき</reb>

Jitenon's 名字事典 only has しぎはら and しぎばら

Probably meant for 鴫田

Likely a mismatch; this reading is unlikely to be used.

Let's keep it.

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<misc>&person;</misc>
+<gloss>Ishii Kentarō (1940.9-)</gloss>

Mr. Ishii from 1940 seems to be a president / major stakeholder in a food company, 石井食品.
  https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/石井食品
  http://bbt757.co.jp/servlet/content/2692.html?del=1&tFlg=1

Doesn't have his own wikipedia page. Maybe not notable enough to keep here.

@@ -10,4 +9,0 @@
-<sense>
-<misc>&person;</misc>
-<gloss>Ishii Kentarō (1940.9-)</gloss>
-</sense>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/石井健太郎_(棋士)

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+<sense>
+<misc>&person;</misc>
+<gloss>Ishii Kentarō (1992.4.13-; professional shogi player)</gloss>
+</sense>

tarou conversion
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Ishii Kentarou (1940.9-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ishii Kentarō (1940.9-)</gloss>

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokyo_Toden

Thanks for that information. According to Wikipedia it's the only line left in Tokyo.

I saw your comment earlier on the Token Arakawa line, so I was happy to add this.  I've also taken this train, just a handful of times though.

I've never heard a Japanese person call it this as a tool for commuting.  It seems to be a cutesy marketing term for foreigners, as one of the last remaining "tram" lines in Tokyo.  And I think you're still right, when they say "it's a nick name", I don't think it's a nickname Japanese commuters gave it ;)

Ah, wikipedia has a note. The name was voted and adopted in 2017, explicitly for marketing. An easy-to-understand name for foreigners tourists. 
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/都電荒川線
愛称
2017年3月、都交通局は利用者増と沿線活性化のため、荒川線の愛称を決めることとした。外国人観光客にも分かりやすいように「東京○○トラム」という形式として、○○に入る言葉の候補8つを提示し、一般からの投票で絞り込んだ[8]。その結果、同年4月28日に「東京さくらトラム」に決定したと発表された[4]。

And this is what that became(so, perhaps, mission accomplished?):

Tokyo Sakura Tram: Experience Tokyo's Secret Neighborhoods, Off the Beaten Path!
https://livejapan.com/en/in-tokyo/in-pref-tokyo/in-ikebukuro/article-a0001665/
Tokyo has an adorable little tram called the Sakura Tram! It’s the nickname for the Toden Arakawa Line, one of only two streetcar lines serving the massive metropolis....

I lived on that tram line in 2000/2001. Never heard it called that.

Due to technical limitations, x-refs can't be used in the name dictionary

@@ -11,2 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="5548076">都電荒川線・とでんあらかわせん</xref>

https://www.kotsu.metro.tokyo.jp/eng/services/streetcar.html
What is Tokyo Sakura Tram (Toden Arakawa Line)?

I screwed up the xref by duplicating it (and then deleting it). Sorry about that.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/星野良生

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────╮
│ 高野秀行 │ 6,248 │
│ 髙野秀行 │    60 │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────╯

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/高野秀行_(棋士)