Daijs and GG5 redirect to アングラ.

@@ -11,2 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<gloss>underground</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1019880">アングラ・1</xref>
+<gloss>underground (film, theater, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>alternative</gloss>
+<gloss>experimental</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +18,8 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1019880">アングラ・2</xref>
+<gloss>underground (economy, press, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>unofficial</gloss>
+<gloss>illegal</gloss>
+<gloss>black (money)</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>of unknown origin</gloss>

アンダーグラウンド	134636
アンダーグラウンドが	928
アンダーグラウンドな	20585
アンダーグラウンドの	14629

Not really a noun.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ アンダーグラウンド │ 134,636 │ 90.3% │
│ アンダーグランド　 │  14,460 │  9.7% │
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アンダーグランド</reb>

No loss.

I don't think it's worth recording even as an sk form. It gets 8 Google hits, all false positives.

@@ -9,4 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ウィンブルゾン</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

I've corrected those two Tanaka sentences. Another was OK.

Saw this -ゾ- usage in tanaka corpus sentence #228321 (which is tagged as a priority sentence for a couple terms)

ウ〈ィ／イ〉ンブル〈ド／ゾ〉ン

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ ウィンブルドン │ 188,087 │ 82.7% │
│ ウインブルドン │  39,215 │ 17.2% │
│ ウィンブルゾン │      54 │  0.0% │ - add, sk
│ ウインブルゾン │       0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウィンブルゾン</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

OK

meikyo; wisdom

@@ -11,0 +12,9 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>enamel paint</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>enameled leather</gloss>
+<gloss>patent leather</gloss>
+</sense>

ステッカー	1625412	99.4%
ステッカ	10149	0.6%

@@ -6,0 +7,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ステッカ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Drop it.

@@ -13,4 +12,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>stacker</gloss>
-</sense>

gg5; chuujiten; prog

Not seeing "stacker" in my refs, but if it's to be kept, should be split out.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<gloss>(adhesive) label</gloss>

OK then.

Along with daijr/s and koj, sankoku also has a redirect entry for バッチ with this meaning.

daijirin: 「バッジ（badge）」の訛り。

@@ -10,2 +10,2 @@
-<reb>バッヂ</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+<reb>バッチ</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<reb>バッチ</reb>
+<reb>バッヂ</reb>

I'd hide them both.

@@ -10,2 +10,2 @@
-<reb>バッチ</reb>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<reb>バッヂ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<reb>バッヂ</reb>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<reb>バッチ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ バッジ │ 455,362 │ 90.9% │
│ バッヂ │  45,860 │  9.1% │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バッヂ</reb>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

All my JEs have バッチ as "batch" alone. Daijirin has two バッチ entries - one saying "batch" and the other saying "「バッジ（badge）」の訛り。". I think we shouldn't be merging purely on an errant transcription/pronunciation.

@@ -11,0 +11,1 @@
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

Daijirin has two senses for this: one for the general meaning of "batch" and another for flocks of animals.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>

(see also ホームパイ (Fujiya), まるごとレモンパイ (Furuta))

I never knew it also meant パルミエ.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2859206">パルミエ</xref>

also
https://oceans-nadia.com/user/855684/recipe/455678
2つの材料でフランスのパイ菓子【パルミエ】

e.g. うなぎパイ　(春華堂)、　源氏パイ (三立製菓株式会社)

@@ -12,0 +13,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&food;</field>
+<gloss>palmier (sweet, crispy pastry)</gloss>

All the JEs lead with "helper". "unwell" and "ill" are synonyms.

@@ -27,2 +27,2 @@
-<gloss>assistant (esp. of someone unwell or ill)</gloss>
-<gloss>helper</gloss>
+<gloss>helper (e.g. for a sick person)</gloss>
+<gloss>assistant</gloss>

It's only 介 that is ateji, but I'm not sure that needs a special mention.
Half of my kokugos have the okurigana-less version. I think it's okay to drop the [io] tag.

〈介／かい／カイ〉〈添（え）／副（え）／ぞえ／ゾエ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 介添え　 │ 23,863 │ 66.2% │
│ 介添　　 │ 11,091 │ 30.8% │
│ 介副　　 │    489 │  1.4% │
│ かい副　 │    247 │  0.7% │
│ かいぞえ │    330 │  0.9% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>

I think "learn" should lead. "(in depth)" seems unnecessary.
I gave up trying to split this into senses. It's a rather fine distinction and the glosses overlap quite a bit.

@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>to study (in depth)</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>to study</gloss>

It's a fine line. 中辞典 splits it into 3 senses and GG5 has it as one. I wouldn't object to it being split, but with over 200 example sentences I wouldn't relish reindexing them.

[vt]: meikyo, smk, iwakoku

Some of the kokugos split into multiple senses ("to receive an education (at a university)", "to learn a lesson from an experience", etc.).
Prog also splits into 3 senses.
Not sure how much of that is needed.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 学ぶ　　 │ 9,997,687 │ 98.3% │
│ 學ぶ　　 │     2,520 │  0.0% │ - [oK] to [sK]
│ まなぶ　 │   173,126 │  1.7% │
├─ーーーー─┼───────────┼───────┤
│ 学んで　 │ 1,885,862 │ 99.6% │
│ 學んで　 │       486 │  0.0% │
│ まなんで │     7,830 │  0.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

桜んぼ	        2,611	        0.1%	
桜ん坊	        22,926	        1.0%	
桜桃	        64,348	        2.9%	
桜んぼう	        77	        0.0%	
さくらんぼ	1,819,006	81.4%	
さくらんぼう	13,459	        0.6%	
サクランボ	312,664	        14.0%

If we hide 桜んぼ, we can drop the restrictions. Not sure why GG5 uses that form.
"sweet cherry" is the name of the tree. I think the gloss needs to be phrased like this.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>桜んぼ</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -16 +13,2 @@
-<keb>桜んぼう</keb>
+<keb>桜んぼ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,3 +17,0 @@
-<re_restr>桜んぼ</re_restr>
-<re_restr>桜ん坊</re_restr>
-<re_restr>桜桃</re_restr>
@@ -28,3 +22,0 @@
-<re_restr>桜ん坊</re_restr>
-<re_restr>桜桃</re_restr>
-<re_restr>桜んぼう</re_restr>
@@ -39,2 +31 @@
-<gloss>cherry fruit (esp. sweet cherry, Prunus avium)</gloss>
-<gloss>cherry</gloss>
+<gloss>cherry (fruit; esp. of the sweet cherry, Prunus avium)</gloss>

@@ -38,0 +39 @@
+<gloss>cherry fruit (esp. sweet cherry, Prunus avium)</gloss>
@@ -40 +40,0 @@
-<gloss>cherry fruit (esp. sweet cherry, Prunus avium)</gloss>

wisdom

@@ -38,0 +39 @@
+<gloss>cherry</gloss>

中辞典 (has 桜ん坊/さくらんぼ)

GG5 has only 桜んぼ. I think it should be first. "uk" rules.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>桜桃</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -15,0 +13,3 @@
+<keb>桜桃</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<re_restr>桜んぼ</re_restr>
+<re_restr>桜ん坊</re_restr>
@@ -21 +22,0 @@
-<re_restr>桜んぼ</re_restr>
@@ -26,0 +28 @@
+<re_restr>桜ん坊</re_restr>
@@ -28 +29,0 @@
-<re_restr>桜ん坊</re_restr>

meikyo; daijs; JEs

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>to be wet</gloss>
+<gloss>to be wet (with tears)</gloss>

koj, daij, gg5, prog, nc

splitting senses

@@ -19,2 +19,10 @@
-<gloss>to be clouded</gloss>
-<gloss>to be dimmed</gloss>
+<gloss>to be wet</gloss>
+<gloss>to be moist</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to get dim</gloss>
+<gloss>to become blurred</gloss>
+<gloss>to get cloudy</gloss>
+<gloss>to get muddy</gloss>
@@ -22,2 +30,6 @@
-<gloss>to be wet</gloss>
-<gloss>to get muddy</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<s_inf>of one's voice</s_inf>
+<gloss>to become tear-choked</gloss>

順序通り	3841	55.9%
順序どおり	3031	44.1%

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>順序どおり</keb>

OK as-is.

not sure if adj-no or adv should lead
or if only really adv with に

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Back in 2012 Daiirin was available via KOD and I may have seen it there. (Kenkyusha has since dropped it.)

女蕩し	113

I'm also unable to find 女垂し.
Sankoku has 女蕩し.

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>女蕩し</keb>

Jim in 2010: "女垂し is in Daij, etc. but only gets 3 hits. Very odd."

Not seeing that form (nor 女垂らし) in daij? I assume it was OK I removed it? (0 ngrams)

女たらし	28534	73.6%
女誑し	521	1.3% rK
女垂らし	413	1.1% not in disc, making sK
女垂し	0	0.0% remocing
女タラシ	989	2.6%
女ったらし	8287	21.4%
女ッタラシ	0	0.0%
女っタラシ	31	0.1%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,3 +13 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>女垂し</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

would be its own entry, not here

JEs

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>honorable certificate</gloss>
-<gloss>honourable certificate</gloss>
+<gloss>certificate of merit</gloss>
+<gloss>testimonial</gloss>

Aligning with 尾

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>tail (animal)</gloss>
+<gloss>tail (of an animal)</gloss>

I agree, although the JEs usually use kana for examples.

G n-grams:
 尻尾を   	242537
 しっぽを  	152891
 尻尾の先  	 16052
 しっぽの先	 12684
 尻尾が生え	  4564
 しっぽが生え	  2952

Probably not [uk].
The n-gram count for しっぽ includes false matches,
such as しっぽの大冒険 (6894) from the online game トリックスター.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -23 +21,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>tip</gloss>

prog; wisdom; genius

@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>checkup</gloss>
+<gloss>consultation</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Iwakoku, sankoku, and smk say 雅語的.

Iwakoku puts the note on the second sense. I'd guess that the first sense probably isn't used much in practice, and that it's only mentioned by the refs in order to explain the literal meaning.

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<misc>&poet;</misc>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 息吹　 │ 349,832 │ 89.1% │
│ 息吹き │  40,675 │ 10.4% │
│ 気吹　 │   1,937 │  0.5% │ - rK (daijr/s, koj)
│ いぶき │ 186,908 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Thanks

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

This entry needed some work.
打ち貫く is in daijr/s and koj.

@@ -8,2 +8,2 @@
-<keb>打抜く</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>打ち貫く</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12 +12 @@
-<keb>打ち貫く</keb>
+<keb>打抜く</keb>
@@ -25,3 +25,5 @@
-<gloss>to punch</gloss>
-<gloss>to hit and hit</gloss>
-<gloss>to stamp out</gloss>
+<gloss>to go through (e.g. a wall)</gloss>
+<gloss>to penetrate</gloss>
+<gloss>to pierce</gloss>
+<gloss>to perforate</gloss>
+<gloss>to bore into</gloss>
@@ -32,3 +34,13 @@
-<gloss>to pierce</gloss>
-<gloss>to bore into</gloss>
-<gloss>to knock down walls</gloss>
+<gloss>to punch (a hole, pattern, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to stamp out (e.g. a coin)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to remove (partitions between rooms)</gloss>
+<gloss>to join (multiple rooms) into one</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to carry out (to completion)</gloss>

打ち抜く	19602	55.0%
打抜く	353	1.0%
打ち貫く	766	2.1%
ぶち抜く	13867	38.9%
うち抜く	69	0.2%
うちぬく	205	0.6%
ぶちぬく	773

OK, I'll set up the split. I'll approve and reopen.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,3 +13 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>ぶち抜く</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,10 +20,0 @@
-<re_restr>打ち抜く</re_restr>
-<re_restr>打抜く</re_restr>
-<re_restr>打ち貫く</re_restr>
-<re_restr>うち抜く</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ぶちぬく</reb>
-<re_restr>打ち抜く</re_restr>
-<re_restr>打抜く</re_restr>
-<re_restr>ぶち抜く</re_restr>

I suggest splitting out ぶち

The JEs lead with "chisel".

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>chisel</gloss>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>chisel</gloss>

挑灯	359
daijirin, smk, nikkoku

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>挑灯</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

提灯	813,815	98.9%	
提燈	8,882	1.1%	- uncommon kyujitai -> sK

I'd rather we dropped the ていとう reading than clutter the entry with restr tags. It's not in any of the JEs or smaller kokugos (or daijr).

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,4 +17,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ていとう</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
@@ -22 +18,0 @@
-<stagr>ちょうちん</stagr>
@@ -29,7 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>handheld lantern</gloss>
-<gloss>handheld lamp</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>ちょうちん</stagr>

Been around too long. Not convinced that sense 3 should be here.

中辞典 uses しめ上げる in examples.

Simplifying a bit.

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>しめ上げる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -20,2 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>to firmly tighten (e.g. neck, throat)</gloss>
-<gloss>to constrict (someone, something)</gloss>
+<gloss>to firmly tighten (e.g. around neck, throat)</gloss>
+<gloss>to constrict</gloss>
@@ -29 +32,0 @@
-<stagk>締上げる</stagk>
@@ -33 +36 @@
-<gloss>to crack down on (someone)</gloss>
+<gloss>to crack down on</gloss>
@@ -40 +42,0 @@
-<stagk>締上げる</stagk>

sankoku, daijr/s, smk, meikyo, senkoku

added more glosses and used neck/throat as examples which most kokugos do + changed the "screw" gloss to be more clear
gg5 uses "put the screws on" but i think it's a mistranslation, kokugos all use "せめる", "苦しめる" or "取り締まる" and i don't believe it's helpful at all as it has a pretty different meaning in english
gave "settle accounts" its own sense

i wonder if i might have missed a better way to make it clear that "絞め上げる" can only be used for the 1st sense (and possibly when referring to "首")?

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>締上げる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -15,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>to firmly tighten (e.g. neck, throat)</gloss>
@@ -17 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>to bind tightly</gloss>
+<gloss>to squeeze</gloss>
+<gloss>to bind</gloss>
@@ -19 +25 @@
-<gloss>to screw up (e.g. a nut)</gloss>
+<gloss>to screw in (e.g. a bulb)</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +28,2 @@
+<stagk>締め上げる</stagk>
+<stagk>締上げる</stagk>
@@ -24,2 +32,11 @@
-<gloss>to put the screws on (a person)</gloss>
-<gloss>to pursue rigorously</gloss>
+<gloss>to strongly press (someone)</gloss>
+<gloss>to crack down on (someone)</gloss>
+<gloss>to pursue relentlessly</gloss>
+<gloss>to keep under strict control</gloss>
+<gloss>to put the screws on</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>締め上げる</stagk>
+<stagk>締上げる</stagk>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>to screw up (e.g. nut)</gloss>
+<gloss>to screw up (e.g. a nut)</gloss>

GG5: 〔ねじで〕 screw up; 〔人をきびしくとがめる〕 《口》 put the screws on sb.
中辞典: 〈しぼるように〉 wring; 〈首などを〉 throttle a person; strangle a person
ルミナス: 	(強くしばる) bind…tightly; (厳しく追求する) put the heat on…
Daijr/s

"screw up" belongs in the other sense, which all the refs put first. I'll expand and reorder.

@@ -16 +16,4 @@
-<gloss>to put the screws on (a person)</gloss>
+<gloss>to constrict (someone, something)</gloss>
+<gloss>to bind tightly</gloss>
+<gloss>to wring</gloss>
+<gloss>to screw up (e.g. nut)</gloss>
@@ -21 +24,3 @@
-<gloss>to constrict (someone, something)</gloss>
+<gloss>to put the screws on (a person)</gloss>
+<gloss>to pursue rigorously</gloss>
+<gloss>to settle accounts</gloss>

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

there was nothing wrong with the original

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<gloss>heavenly body</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/天体

@@ -19,1 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>heavenly body</gloss>
+<gloss>celestial body</gloss>
+<gloss>astronomical object</gloss>

JEs

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>theft</gloss>

Unlikely to be translated as "full date". The JEs just have "date".

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>full date (year, month and day)</gloss>
+<gloss>date (year, month and day)</gloss>

sankoku, daijr/s, smk, meikyo

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>date</gloss>
+<gloss>full date (year, month and day)</gloss>

GG5

Xref not needed.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1358800">尻尾・1</xref>
@@ -19,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>cauda</gloss>

尻尾を振って	27214	92.5%
尾を振って	2218	7.5%

尻尾を振る	10123	81.9%
尾を振る	2240	18.1%

I had an old poorly-conceived flashcard with 尾を振る, to wag one's tail. From experience,  尻尾 would usually be used, at least in everyday conversation about pets.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1358800">尻尾・1</xref>

https://astro-dic.jp/dust-tail-2/

@@ -18 +18,5 @@
-<gloss>tail (animal, kite, comet, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>tail (of an animal)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>tail (of a kite, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +24,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&astron;</field>
+<gloss>tail (of a comet)</gloss>

JEs

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>secret meeting</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────────╮
│ 迷子　 │ 1,180,389 │
│ 迷児　 │       286 │ - add, sK (iwakoku, shinsen, obunsha, jitenon)
│ まいご │   100,924 │
╰─ーーー─┴───────────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>迷児</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

wiki: "子供だけではなく、成人でも初めて訪れた場所などでは同様の状況に陥りや
すくなり、迷子と呼ばれることがある。"
daijs: "道がわからなくなったり、連れにはぐれたりすること。また、その子供やそ
の人。まよいご。"
daijr has two senses: 
［1］	親にはぐれたり、道に迷ったりした子供。
［2］	連れからはぐれること。また、そのもの。

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<gloss>lost person</gloss>

GG5, etc.

@@ -18,1 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>lost (stray) child</gloss>
+<gloss>lost child</gloss>
+<gloss>stray child</gloss>

rare 混ぜ書き forms should be hidden.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<keb>顳かみ</keb>
+<keb>顳</keb>
@@ -17,2 +17,2 @@
-<keb>顳</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>顳かみ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

顳	401	  
顳かみ	195	  <----
顳顬	96	  
顳前	76	  
顳前斜線	68	  
顳を	27 <--- maybe read is こめかみ	
顳に	23	  

顳顬	96	9.5%
蟀谷	314	31.2%
顳かみ	195	19.4%

顳 is rarer than it looks, since 顳かみ is also a valid form.

I use two fonts for reviewing kanji, a handwritten font which is missing a lot of uncommon kanji, and a stroke-order font that has *almost* everything.  I was shocked to find the stroke-order font had 顳 but not 顬.  This may indicate there is a reason why "顳かみ" pops up as a valid form, even though both kanji seem equally esoteric to me. (This is why I include it, instead of [sK]).

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>顳かみ</keb>

こめかみあたり	2641	83.1%
コメカミあたり	539	16.9%
こめかみが痛い	977	81.1%
コメカミが痛い	227	18.9%

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss>temple (side of head)</gloss>
+<gloss>temple (on side of head)</gloss>

https://nanchiku029yasan.com/html/page17.html

The pork references seem to be abbreviations of 豚コメカミ. It could go in as a separate sense with "esp. コメカミ".

GG5 (splits)

@@ -19,0 +20,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>

gg5

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>to coax</gloss>

Tagged as 古風 and 俗 in sankoku.

Meiji example in daijs, Edo in daijr  -prob dated as a verb (i.e. outside 女たらし)?
女を垂らす	0	0.0%
女を誑す 	0	0.0%
女をたらす	32	100.0%
女をタラす	0	0.0%

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>

Indexing is OK.

Thanks. I'll approve this, then reopen it to remind me to look at the indexing. It will be easier to do that once the latest example file is available in a couple of days.

I'll add "note" back in but without the [music] tag. It's not really music terminology.

@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>(musical) note</gloss>

GG5 (おと entry): 
高い[低い]音 a high-[low-]pitched sound
音の高さ pitch
〔演奏[歌唱]で〕 音を間違える play [sing] the wrong note(s)
〔演奏の前に〕 音を合わせる tune up.
GG5 (ね entry): ...〔楽器･鳥などの〕 (a) note ...
琴の音 the 「sound [tones] of a koto
笛の音 the piping of a flute

There's some ambivalence about the use of おと and ね in the context of musical notes. Perhaps we need a gloss here to reflect its use in expressions such as 高い音.

meikyo, daijr, iwakoku

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>

眼鏡	2228370
めがね	1206845
メガネ	3949144

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -31,0 +33 @@
+<stagr>メガネ</stagr>
@@ -32,0 +35 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

https://www.dictionary.com/e/judgement-vs-judgment/

@@ -33,0 +34 @@
+<gloss>judgement</gloss>

meikyo, smk, daijr, etc.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>

I think that works.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">general term for inflammatory respiratory system illness</gloss>
+<gloss>inflammatory respiratory system illness (in general)</gloss>

I think expl's should be treated as glosses, so it shouldn't lead with "general term" - 風邪 is an illness, not a term.
If an expl is needed, which I'm not convinced it is, it should maybe be something like "inflammatory respiratory system illness (in 
general)" instead.

I agonized a bit as I accept that "cold" and "influenza" are not synonyms, but wanted to reflect that 風邪encompasses both.

@@ -21,3 +21 @@
-<gloss>inflammatory respiratory system illness</gloss>
-<gloss>common cold</gloss>
-<gloss>cold</gloss>
+<gloss>(common) cold</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +25 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">general term for inflammatory respiratory system illness</gloss>

lighted -> lightly

@@ -39 +39 @@
-<gloss>deep-frying food lighted coated in flour or potato starch</gloss>
+<gloss>deep-frying food lightly coated in flour or potato starch</gloss>

I think we should mention it.
Refers to the technique as well as the food.

@@ -38,0 +39 @@
+<gloss>deep-frying food lighted coated in flour or potato starch</gloss>

唐揚げ	939116	44.1%
から揚げ	681119	32.0%
唐揚	143321	6.7% daijs says 「唐揚げ」の字も当てることがある。
空揚げ	21679	1.0% rK
カラ揚げ	3885	0.2% sK
空揚	1678	0.1% rK
からあげ	308802	14.5%
カラあげ	264	0.0% remove
カラアゲ	28644	1.3% remove

meikyo and daijs say coated in flour or starch,
daijr says 何もつけないで，または小麦粉やかたくり粉を軽くまぶして油で揚げること
we could mention it but it might be messy. but KFC chicken wouldn't be called 唐揚げ

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +19,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>空揚</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,3 +27 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>空揚</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -26,5 +30,0 @@
-<re_restr>唐揚げ</re_restr>
-<re_restr>から揚げ</re_restr>
-<re_restr>唐揚</re_restr>
-<re_restr>空揚げ</re_restr>
-<re_restr>空揚</re_restr>
@@ -33,8 +32,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>カラあげ</reb>
-<re_restr>カラ揚げ</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>カラアゲ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
@@ -44,0 +37 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1379330">生地・きじ・1</xref>

This needs to be split into 布地/ぬのじ and 裂地, etc./きれじ. Should never have been merged.

@@ -9,11 +8,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>裂地</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>切れ地</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>切地</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -22 +10,0 @@
-<re_restr>布地</re_restr>
@@ -25,3 +12,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>きれじ</reb>
@@ -32,2 +17 @@
-<s_inf>usu. ぬのじ・布地</s_inf>
-<gloss>fabric (esp. for making clothing)</gloss>
+<gloss>fabric</gloss>
@@ -35,11 +19 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagk>裂地</stagk>
-<stagr>きれじ</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>traditionally patterned textiles (esp. for mounting scrolls, pictures, etc., or for adorning bags, clothing, etc.)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>fabric scraps</gloss>
+<gloss>material</gloss>

Dictionary trivia!
「布地」は「ぬのじ」以外になんと読む？読めたらスゴい難読漢字、正解は？
https://trilltrill.jp/articles/2675215
「布地」を「きれじ」と読むなんて、想像もしていなかったのではないでしょうか。 <--- bet you never guessed きれじ!

daijs on 【切れ地／▽布地／▽裂地】:
１ 織物。反物。また、その地質。「厚い―」
２ 織物の切れ端。
３ 袋物や鼻緒などにする特別の紋織物。

sankoku:
ぬのじ：衣服をつくるための布。生地
きれじ：
1)反物。織物
2)反物のきれはし


  生地	8370062

布地	353903	95.6%
切れ地	192	0.1%
切地	2335	0.6%
裂地	13787	3.7%


Hinative users say 布地 = ぬのじ, きれじ = ??? never heard of it and/or "anal fissure"
https://ja.hinative.com/questions/13072539
Response #1:
ぬのじ、です。きじ（生地）、でもいいです。
きれじ、は違う意味になっちゃいます。
Response #2:
ぬのじ(布地)も使いますが、
服やバッグなどを作る材料としては、「きじ(生地)」が一般的です。
Response #3:
「きれ」にも布地・生地の意味はありますが、通じない可能性があります。
「きれじ」の言い方は聞いたことがありません。
「布地（ぬのじ）」もしくは「生地（きじ）」と言うのがいいと思います。
Response #4:
「布地(ぬのじ)」です。「生地(きじ)」という言い方もあります。「余った布」というニュアンスを含む「布切れ(ぬのきれ)」という言葉もありますが、布関係で「きれじ」という言葉は知りません。
「きれじ」は、一般的には「切れ痔(じ(ぢ))」(裂肛, anal fissure の通称)ですね。

Doesn't even *consider* きれじ in it's little "how-do-you-read" exercise(funny question, since ぬのぢ and ぬのじ are the same 読み方...):
布地の正しい読み方は「ぬのぢ」「ぬのじ」？
https://zatugaku-gimonn.com/entry4930.html


「布地」と「生地」の違いを分かりやすく説明していきます。
https://chigai-hikaku.com/?p=41496
「布地」は「ぬのじ」と読みます。


A page on 裂地 as きれじ.
https://sukiwa.net/fabric
裂地（きれじ）について
表装の裂地は、昔は法衣や装束を解いて使っていましたが、明治以降に表装裂地として新たに織られるようになりました。　　　
裂という字
きれを辞書でひくと「切（れ）」と載っているように、裁断した（切った）織物を表具に仕立てるので、（裂くのではなく）「切る」の方が正式かと思われます。 ただし表具で使われる布の総合名詞として、現在は『裂（きれ）』と書くのが一般的になっています。

From the book: How to Make Handmade Wall Scrolls(2010)
"The size and color of the  裂地 kireji (Specialized Finished Scroll Cloth that has Urauchi) "

https://www.seidoshop.com/blogs/the-seido-blog/83-kakejiku-fabric-kireji
The fabric used to make a kakejiku is referred to as "kireji" (裂地). There are numerous types of kireji available in a variety of materials.Kireji's function, similar to that of a frame in Western painting, is to highlight the calligraphy or artwork; therefore picking the proper one is crucial to creating a beautiful composition.

https://nomurakakejiku.com/lesson_lineup/fabric
Kireji
The “kireji” is a type of cloth used for mounting. The price of the kireji influences the price of a “kakejiku” (hanging scroll) or its mounting. The selection of the kireji is an important element for a kakejiku, because the kireji must accentuate a main artwork.

http://y2-office.com/English_index.html
In general, cloth is also called KIRE in Japan. To begin with, KIRE means pieces of a thing. When we want to use cloth, we usually cut out the cloth of necessary length from a roll of cloth. So we came to call not only a piece of cloth but also cloth itself KIRE. Particularly, artistic fabrics with traditional design are called KIREJI.

I think this should probably be split for practical reasons.  布地 seems common-ish, reasonably-well recognized, and understood to be read as ぬのじ. Paul noted in 2016 that no common 和英 references provide きれじ as a reading.  It does comes up in furigina.info (one example was a translation of Les Miserables, for context...). Under きれじ, sankoku lists 切れ地 *before* 布地. If you compare that with the ngrams, that would make きれじ a rare reading of  布地.  So, きれじ seems like, perhaps, an [arch] reading for 布地.

reverso has *lots* of 布地, zero 切れ地；切地.

裂地, on the other hand, does exist on reverso and elsewhere, with a use that seems to reflect daijs' third sense of  きれじ. Thus, we can't flag きれじ as [arch] or [io] or what-have-you on the entire entry. We could write some big [note] or something.

You can actually just google "kireji fabric" and get quite a lot in English.(for sense [2])

What I would recommend is to put  布地 as its own entry with ぬのじ and the note "esp. for making clothing".  Then a separate entry for 裂地;切れ地；切地 as きれじ, including 布地 as [oK]. 

For context on why I'm making this suggestion, I wanted to know the difference between the readings, so I googled 布地  ぬのじ きれじ.  I ran into another American who had the exact same question, no-doubt driven by this exact entry, and posed it to hinative. (That is the danger of these blended entries, with no guidance we're all on our own to figure out what readings are valid).  Anyway, 4 consecutive responses all concurred that 布地 is read "ぬのじ", "きれじ" is unrelated (they were unfamiliar with the [arch] meaning or reading), and one going so far as to warn that the usual interpretation of きれじ would be:
「きれじ」は、一般的には「切れ痔(じ(ぢ))」(裂肛, anal fissure の通称)ですね。

In fact, if you google "布地", image search will return pictures of anatomy instead. So this is no joke.

Hence my motivation to improve the guidance here.

The ever-mysterious 生地 was often referenced as a more-common term for raw fabric.

I've crammed most of what I've found into this entry, you can see how unwieldy it ends up being.

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<keb>裂地</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,3 +18 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>裂地</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -28,0 +31,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1379330">生地・きじ・1</xref>
+<s_inf>usu. ぬのじ・布地</s_inf>
+<gloss>fabric (esp. for making clothing)</gloss>
@@ -30 +35,11 @@
-<gloss>fabric</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>裂地</stagk>
+<stagr>きれじ</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>traditionally patterned textiles (esp. for mounting scrolls, pictures, etc., or for adorning bags, clothing, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>fabric scraps</gloss>

Yes!

研究社 新和英中辞典, prog, Luminous (all only give ぬのじ for 布地)
Kyoto n-grams, Google n-grams (布地 is far more common)

Moving [news1,nf22] to the ぬのじ reading.

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<reb>きれじ</reb>
+<reb>ぬのじ</reb>
+<re_restr>布地</re_restr>
@@ -24,2 +25 @@
-<reb>ぬのじ</reb>
-<re_restr>布地</re_restr>
+<reb>きれじ</reb>

駄々っ子	28108	41.3%
駄駄っ子	262	0.4%
だだっ子	16285	23.9%
駄々っ児	65	0.1%
駄駄っ児	0	0.0%
だだっ児	0	0.0%
だだっこ	18335	26.9%
ダダッコ	1541	2.3%
ダダッ子	1587	2.3%
ダダっ子	1947	2.9%

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20 +22,2 @@
-<keb>だだっ児</keb>
+<keb>ダダっ子</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

koj

sorted by hits

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>駄々っ子</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,1 +11,4 @@
-<keb>駄々っ子</keb>
+<keb>だだっ子</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>駄々っ児</keb>
@@ -14,3 +20,0 @@
-<keb>駄々っ児</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -18,3 +21,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>だだっ子</keb>

@@ -9,0 +9,12 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>駄駄っ児</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>駄々っ児</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>だだっ児</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>だだっ子</keb>

Should be split.

@@ -12,3 +11,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>しょうか</reb>

I meant to move it.

[nokanji] forms usually go last.

The しょうか reading definitely wouldn't be [uk], but oh well

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<reb>しょうか</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -16,3 +18,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>しょうか</reb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 小火 │  17,038 │  6.3% │
│ ぼや │ 144,345 │ 53.2% │
│ ボヤ │ 110,011 │ 40.5% │
╰─ーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+<reb>ボヤ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +22 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Comments on 講ずる

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2672120">措置を講じる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2672120">措置を講じる</xref>
@@ -19,2 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>to take measures</gloss>
-<gloss>to work out a plan</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (e.g. measures)</gloss>
+<gloss>to work out (e.g. a plan)</gloss>

@@ -17,2 +17,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1631450">講ずる</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1631450">講ずる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1631450">講ずる・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1631450">講ずる・1</xref>
@@ -25,0 +25,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1631450">講ずる・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1631450">講ずる・2</xref>
@@ -31,0 +33,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1631450">講ずる・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1631450">講ずる・3</xref>

Actually I don't think those xrefs are needed.

@@ -17,2 +16,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2859209">措置を講ずる</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1878730">策を講ずる</xref>

講じる	288896
講ずる	403279
措置を講ずる	273344	28.3%

The direct-objects appear to be essentially non-optional.

講じる is less common than 講ずる, though I guess they are both common enough that a circular reference is fine...

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2859209">措置を講ずる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1878730">策を講ずる</xref>
@@ -18,2 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>to take measures</gloss>
-<gloss>to work out a plan</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (e.g. measures)</gloss>
+<gloss>to work out (e.g. a plan)</gloss>

@@ -17,1 +17,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1631440">講じる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1631440">講じる・1</xref>
@@ -24,0 +24,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1631440">講じる・2</xref>
@@ -30,0 +31,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1631440">講じる・3</xref>

取締班	357

I'm always reluctant to toss out terms that are in GG5 and other references. This is in Eijiro too along with several other rare XX取締班 compounds. 取締班 itself is not that common. Makes you wonder what is actually used.

麻薬取締班	53

Rare compound. I don't think it's worth keeping.

GG5, KOD

May as well stay.

A+B

OK, didn't see that in the first dictionary definition I got on Google, my bad.

"movement" by itself can refer to bowel movements. All the English dictionaries have it as a sense.
Several of the JEs have "(bowel) movement". I don't really mind which way we do it.

Why put "bowel" in brackets? If "movement" by itself can refer to "bowel movement" then it makes sense to me, but that doesn't seem to really be the case?

luminous, daij, smk
daijr: 「お通じ」と「お」を付けて用いることが多い
お通じがよく	7,639		
通じがよく	7,993		
お通じがある	2,426		
通じがある	2,537

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>bowel movement</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. お〜</s_inf>
+<gloss>(bowel) movement</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>defecation</gloss>
@@ -21 +23 @@
-<gloss>understanding</gloss>
+<gloss>understanding (of another's thoughts, feelings, etc.)</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

daijr:  胆汁を含んだままの熊の胆囊を乾燥させたもの。苦みが強い。利胆・消炎・鎮痙・強壮などの目的で用いる。熊胆。

Not the bile.
None of my refs have くまのい for 熊胆 (except koj which usually omits okurigana). I think 熊胆/ゆうたん should be split out.

@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>熊胆</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12,4 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ゆうたん</reb>
-<re_restr>熊胆</re_restr>
@@ -23,2 +16 @@
-<gloss>bear's gall (used as medicine for the stomach)</gloss>
-<gloss>bear's bile</gloss>
+<gloss>dried bear's gallbladder (used as a medicine)</gloss>

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<reb>クマノイ［nokanji］</reb>
+<reb>クマノイ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

熊の胆	3159	70.1%
クマノイ	1089	24.2%
クマの胆	257	5.7%

@@ -15,0 +16,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>クマノイ［nokanji］</reb>

synonym

@@ -20,0 +20,1 @@
+<gloss>bear's bile</gloss>

gg5 (entry for かいせい【改正】)
  契約を左の通り改正する.

I see adverbial and noun usages

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Yes, sankoku has it as a usage example for 左・さ. Also has it tagged as 文

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>

Needed? Is さ correct?

Fork.

証として	89982	92.1%
証しとして	7674	7.9%
https://mazii.net/en-US/search/word/jaen/証として

Seems it can be either. WWW hits favour あかしとして.

@@ -6,0 +7,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>証しとして</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あかしとして</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +15 @@
+<re_restr>証として</re_restr>

shouldn't this be あかし?

証として	89982	92.1%
証しとして	7674	7.9%
https://mazii.net/en-US/search/word/jaen/証として

Fork. I'll reject mine.
Seems it can be either. WWW hits favour あかしとして.

Shinmeikai (entry for あかし・証):
  「友情の━として」
Sankoku (entry for しょう・証)
  「後日の━として」

〈証（し）／あかし／アカシ〉として

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 証として　　 │ 89,982 │ 89.7% │
│ 証しとして　 │  7,674 │  7.6% │ - add
│ あかしとして │  2,639 │  2.6% │ - add
│ アカシとして │     42 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

Seems it can be either

@@ -6,0 +7,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>証しとして</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あかしとして</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +15 @@
+<re_restr>証として</re_restr>

shouldn't this be あかし?

世間の通りがよくない　be poorly received by the public; be unpopular.

A+B. Sense 5 of 通り. GG5 has it in an example sentence but I don't think it's worth keeping.

世間のとおり	0	0.0%
世間の通り	59	36.4%
世間通り	73	45.1%
世間どおり	30	18.5%

GG5 has it, pointing to 元通り.

I'd keep it.

元の通り	8905	73.1%
もとの通り	1491	12.2%
元のとおり	1793	14.7%

Needed?

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>元のとおり</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15 +19 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>もとの通り</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

RP too.

I think this is closer

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>コマす</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +12,4 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&vulg;</misc>
+<gloss>to seduce</gloss>
+<gloss>to hit on</gloss>
@@ -11 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>to have sexual intercourse</gloss>

http://zokugo-dict.com/10ko/komasu.htm
これが転じ、口説くという意味も持つが
https://kotobank.jp/word/こます-269326
② だます、くどく、手に入れることをいう
https://hinative.com/questions/23314826
騙す、たぶらかす、(女性を)口説くという意味があります。
https://okwave.jp/qa/q329006.html
下品な言い方ですが，「女をコマす」とか，ナンパが上手な人を「コマし屋」と言ったりします
https://www.weblio.jp/content/こます 隠語大辞典
巧言をもって婦女子等を騙かすことをいう。転じて一般に人を欺す所為をいう。おだてる、くどく、たぶらかす。ごまかすこと。

女をコマす means "to hit on women", not "to have sexual intercourse"

弾丸飛雨	0	0.0%  <--- this term
弾丸雨飛	158	100.0% <--- we don't have this (still rare)

In some older books.  Many of the 弾丸 terms are quite common, but not this one

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

Remove unsupported yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Entry created

いつも通り	1009485	64.1%
何時も通り	16504	1.0%
いつもどおり	496571	31.5%
いつもとおり	3513	0.2%
いつもどうり	48349	3.1%

@@ -17,0 +18,4 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>いつもどうり</reb>

いつも通り	1009485	66.1%
何時も通り	16504	1.1% -sK
いつもどおり	496571	32.5%
いつもとおり	3513	0.2% - ik to sk

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17 +18 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

いつも通り	1009485
いつもの通り	142923

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1188910">何時もの通りに</xref>

I've reindexed the one sentence.

gg5
鬱憤晴らし	20,278		
うっぷん晴らし	8,549

Let's change it to 鬱憤晴らし.

@@ -5 +5,4 @@
-<keb>鬱憤晴らす</keb>
+<keb>鬱憤晴らし</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>うっぷん晴らし</keb>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<reb>うっぷんはらす</reb>
+<reb>うっぷんはらし</reb>
@@ -11,7 +14,4 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2102270">鬱憤を晴らす</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2102270">鬱憤を晴らす</xref>
-<gloss>to vent one's frustration</gloss>
-<gloss>to release one's pent-up anger</gloss>
-<gloss>to let off steam</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>venting one's pent-up anger</gloss>
+<gloss>venting one's frustration</gloss>
+<gloss>letting off steam</gloss>

鬱憤晴らし	20278	94.6% <- GG5, 中辞典
鬱憤晴らす	1148	5.4%  <- can't see in references.
鬱憤を晴らす	25865

Should probably either add 鬱憤晴らし as an entry, or convert this one to it. 鬱憤を晴らす should stay.

note to align with xref.

@@ -15 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>to vent one's anger</gloss>
+<gloss>to vent one's frustration</gloss>
+<gloss>to release one's pent-up anger</gloss>
+<gloss>to let off steam</gloss>

Quiet. Closing.

One more try

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>the average person</gloss>
+<gloss>uncultured but well-intentioned person</gloss>

It's a pretty rare expression and the definition 無教養ではあるが善意の庶民をいう称。 seems more precise than "average person" /Joe Blow/Bloggs to me.

GG5: 	the average person; your average nice guy; 《米》Joe Blow [《英》Joe Bloggs].

"average Joe" works OK for me. It's quite idiomatic English for this meaning. OTOH switching to GG5's version is not a problem.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>the average Joe</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2114640">熊さん八っつあん</xref>
+<gloss>the average person</gloss>

daijs
くまこう‐はちこう【熊公八公】 の解説
《落語などに出てくる庶民を代表する二人の名から》無教養ではあるが善意の庶民をいう称。熊さん八つぁん。

I don't think "average Joe" is an appropriate translation here.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2114640">熊さん八っつあん</xref>

ことば通り	1986

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ことば通り</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1432930">通り・どおり・1</xref>

https://sanko1.co.jp/cat-blog/1654
レーザーには「カット」と「彫刻」という機能があります。言葉通り「カット」は素材を切ったり穴をあけたりする機能。

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -15 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>exactly as stated</gloss>
+<gloss>as stated</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>literally</gloss>

I meant, is [n] needed?

GG5

Worth having.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1432930">通り・どおり・1</xref>

こよなく愛する	749485
こよなく愛した	39836
こよなく愛して	119995
こよなく	1283174

True, but as a very common stock phrase I think it's worth keeping. It accounts for most of the use of こよなく.

A+B. Meaning is obvious.

https://www.edrdg.org/wwwjdic/wwwverbinf.html#suru_tag

No, vs-s because it's こよなく + 愛する. See the referenced page.
vs-i are "regular" する formations such as 勉強する.

Shouldn't this be vs-i? What'. the difference between the two?

〈蚊／か〉〈帳／や〉〈吊（り）／釣（り）／つり〉〈草／ぐさ〉／カヤツリグサ

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ かやつり草　 │    562 │  3.8% │ - add, sK
│ 蚊帳吊り草　 │    501 │  3.4% │ - add, sK
│ 蚊帳吊草　　 │    219 │  1.5% │
│ 蚊帳つり草　 │     57 │  0.4% │
│ 蚊帳釣り草　 │     54 │  0.4% │ - add, sK
│ 蚊帳釣草　　 │     48 │  0.3% │
│ カヤツリグサ │ 11,961 │ 80.8% │
│ かやつりぐさ │  1,396 │  9.4% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12,12 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>かやつり草</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蚊帳吊り草</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蚊帳釣り草</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

蚊帳吊草	219	82.0% <- GG5
蚊帳釣草	48	18.0% <- 中辞典, ルミナス

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蚊帳釣草</keb>

かやつりぐさ【莎草】 is in various 国語辞典 (daijirin, daijisen, kojien, shinmeikai, etc.)

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>蚊帳吊草</re_restr>

It seems like these readings should be restricted like this.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_restr>蚊帳吊草</re_restr>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<re_restr>莎草</re_restr>

みての通り	3500

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>みての通り</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +19,2 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>in accordance with what you see</gloss>

We don't have a hard rule on this but we're 
usually only adding spec1 to words/expressions 
that have at least 1m hits in the 2007 ngrams.

Goog
見ての通り	169282
見てのとおり	61544
みてのとおり	4749

KM
見ての通り	5240
見てのとおり	2830
みてのとおり	153

I'm a little surprised at the n-gram counts for this. Also comes up seemingly on an average of every two or three minutes on Twitter. Worthy of a [spec] tag?

GG5

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ 臨時従業員 │ 2,029 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────╯

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>

Entry created

Needs gerund glosses.

@@ -14,2 +14,4 @@
-<gloss>viewed as inevitable</gloss>
-<gloss>regarded as reasonable</gloss>
+<gloss>regarding as (quite) natural</gloss>
+<gloss>regarding as something to be expected</gloss>
+<gloss>regarding as a matter of course</gloss>
+<gloss>regarding as right and proper</gloss>

当然視	7638	 
当然視する	1844
当然視して	1256
当然視される	615
当然視されて	2034

Could go either way. GG5 has a subentry of 当然視.

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>considering to be inevitable</gloss>
-<gloss>considering to be reasonable</gloss>
+<gloss>viewed as inevitable</gloss>
+<gloss>regarded as reasonable</gloss>

better this way?

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>当然視する</keb>
+<keb>当然視</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>とうぜんしする</reb>
+<reb>とうぜんし</reb>
@@ -11,3 +11,5 @@
-<pos>&vs-i;</pos>
-<gloss>to consider to be inevitable</gloss>
-<gloss>to consider to be reasonable</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>considering to be inevitable</gloss>
+<gloss>considering to be reasonable</gloss>

Entry created

smk: 〔「尻」と「しっぽ」の混合形〕尻の方。〔動物・凧タコの〕「しっぽ」の幼児語。
daijr: （１）尻。また，尾(オ)。
       （２）尻のほう。はしの方。

Not just animals.
Relatively uncommon but don't think [rare] is appropriate.

@@ -12,3 +12,7 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1358800">尻尾・1</xref>
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>tail (animal)</gloss>
+<gloss>tail end</gloss>
+<gloss>rear</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>tail</gloss>
+<gloss>bottom</gloss>

I think it's the animal one.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1358800">尻尾</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1358800">尻尾</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1358800">尻尾・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1358800">尻尾・1</xref>
@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>tail</gloss>
+<gloss>tail (animal)</gloss>

しっぽ	1656745	62.8%
尻尾	977049	37.1%
しりっぽ	2307	0.1%
尻っぽ	615	0.0%


https://yspalace.hatenablog.com/entry/20080520/p1
A300は尻が他と比べて大きく上がっており、B767の尻っぽは丸く、B777の尻っぽは

Seems like this should either be:
  tail (of an animal)

or xref all senses of 尻尾.  Technically I guess it's the latter, but I imagine this is usually for animals...

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1358800">尻尾・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1358800">尻尾・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1358800">尻尾</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1358800">尻尾</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

Entry created

Aligning.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>bowel movement</gloss>
+<gloss>(bowel) movement</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>defecation</gloss>

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1854760">通じ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1854760">通じ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1854760">通じ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1854760">通じ・1</xref>

Entry created

I think it's confusing to call this an adjective.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>

前項に規定する	204628

It came out of the "Standard Legal Terms Dictionary" and is apparently a stock term in legal texts. Probably worth keeping. Not used as a verb.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&vs-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>

Overly compositional

Seems common. I'd leave it.

Delete?

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&vs-i;</pos>