https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/disimprove

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>disimprovement</gloss>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>change for the worse</gloss>
+<gloss>changing (something) for the worse</gloss>

nikk

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 器量 │ 107,725 │ 94.9% │
│ 気量 │   5,778 │  5.1% │
╰─ーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>気量</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

OK

As 縹緻 is not a variant of 器量, I don't think we can make it sK unless we include an "also written as 縹緻" note on sense 1. I'm not sure if that's a better approach (considering the form's rarity).

I'm inclined to change that rK to sK and remove the 器量 restrictions from the later senses. After all the kokugos only say ...とも書く... and are not stating that 縹緻 really is a valid surface form.

daij, koj, RP

GG5 puts "demarcation" with sense 1. Some of these glosses work for both senses. I don't think "subdivision" is needed, even though GG5 has it.
Added sense.

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>demarcation</gloss>
@@ -24 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>subdivision</gloss>
+<gloss>segmentation</gloss>
+<gloss>compartment</gloss>
@@ -26 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>compartment</gloss>
@@ -34 +34 @@
-<gloss>demarcation</gloss>
+<gloss>grouping</gloss>
@@ -35,0 +36,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<field>&logic;</field>
+<gloss>division</gloss>

GG5

Splitting into senses.

@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>demarcation</gloss>
@@ -25 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>segmentation</gloss>
@@ -28,0 +27,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -30,0 +34,2 @@
+<gloss>demarcation</gloss>
+<gloss>segmentation</gloss>

meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog, luminous, wisdom, daij

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>words and phrases</gloss>
@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>phrases</gloss>

gg5, luminous, wisdom

I think it's quite easy to work out the meaning of 合同〜 compounds from the noun glosses but I don't object to having a separate adj-no sense.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -23,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>joining</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>merger</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +28,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>combined</gloss>
+<gloss>joint</gloss>
+<gloss>united</gloss>
+<gloss>shared</gloss>
@@ -31 +38,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

daijs

I think this could use some plain-english glosses
such as "together" or "shared" or "common"
so you don't have to wonder what 合同授業 is supposed to mean

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -29 +30,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

澁 is a rare kyūjitai. Changing the tag to [sK].

Both example sentences are for sense [2]. I updated the indices. 

There are three example sentences for 〜顔をする. Maybe a x-ref in this entry is helpful.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 渋い　　 │ 989,319 │
│ 渋い顔　 │  42,279 │
│ 渋い顔を │  17,783 │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────╯

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -42,0 +43 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1881340">渋い顔をする</xref>

@@ -39,0 +39,1 @@
+<gloss>understated</gloss>

I don't think we need a separate entry for 証し.
I don't think the 証し人 x-ref is needed.

@@ -17,4 +16,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>しょう</reb>
-<re_restr>証</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
@@ -31,8 +26,0 @@
-<stagr>しょう</stagr>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>certificate</gloss>
-<gloss>license</gloss>
-<gloss>membership card</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>あかし</stagr>
@@ -42 +29,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2859122">証し人</xref>
@@ -48,12 +34,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>しょう</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&Buddh;</field>
-<gloss>enlightenment</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>しょう</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>symptoms (in Chinese medicine)</gloss>
-<gloss>patient's condition</gloss>

I think this needs to be split into at least two and possibly three entries:
- 証/あかし - sense 1
- 証/しょう - senses 1, 2, 4 and 5
- 証し/あかし - sense 3

神の愛を証し	365	  
神の愛を証しする	77 <-- 20k googits (I know,...) explicit し wins in the [Christn] ngrams
神の愛を証する	20 <-- 2k googits	

キリストを証しする	537	76.3%　<-- し wins again
キリストを証する	167	23.7%
  


Book: 証し 日本のキリスト者
https://www.amazon.co.jp/証し-日本のキリスト者-最相-葉月/dp/404601900X

Review of said book;
＜書評＞『証し　日本のキリスト者』最相葉月 著
https://www.tokyo-np.co.jp/article/242908
読者は、本書を開くとまず、「証し」とは何かの定義を見る。「『証し』とは、キリスト者が神からいただいた恵みを言葉や行動を通して人に伝えること。証、証言ともいう」。

(use of "testimony"):
Paul’s Testimony: The Gospel of the Grace of God 「 使徒パウロの証し：神の恵みの福音 」
https://www.alive.international/sermons/pauls-testimony-the-gospel-of-the-grace-of-god-「-使徒パウロの証し：神の恵みの/

Bilingual memorial service:
証し Testimony
Linked to timestamp with 証し Testimony on powerpoint slides.
https://youtu.be/xCzG4t0ZGVw?t=2568

「証（あか）しする」とは？　「賜物（たまもの）」とは？
https://www.cbcj.catholic.jp/faq/testimony/
いずれも基本的に、信者がイエス・キリストの教えにしたがって生活し、そのことばと行いを通して、まわりの人々にキリストの愛を伝えることを表します。
google trans: living according to the teachings of Jesus Christ and communicating Christ's love to those around them through their words and deeds. 
(i.e. witnessing)


It's not a word-for-word translation, but 証し is either "witnessing" or "share and declare the Gospel of Jesus Christ". Also, [vs,vt]
https://ariakebc.jp/bible-vitamin/20230817-あらゆる機会をとらえてキリストの復活を証し/
またパウロが引き裂かれそうになっているのを見てローマの司令官はパウロを兵営へ連れ戻しました。パウロはもう一度絶妙に機会をとらえて、いのちをもものともせず、キリストの復活を証しました。
But Paul is once again witnessing to the resurrection of Jesus Christ which is the pivotal point of the Gospel. Paul again uses every opportunity to share and declare the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

===========

何々の証し, eijiro is riddled with "a testament to"... collocations
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=証し
Testament examples (17)
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/証し#testament

One of the references is sense [3], and uses [vs,vt]: 
Such evidence witnesses to the fact that the New Testament was recognized far earlier than the Council of Carthage 
このような証拠は、新約聖書が紀元397年のカルタゴの会議よりもはるか前から認識されていた事実を証しています。

Might be worth splitting しょう　and あかし. (not jmdict's fault, but there's quite a mess in Japanese between　あかしする　あかす　しょうする　しょうす　あかし　しょう).  (note: I read all the previous comments on this)

I have a wrinkle for you.  I think [3] is also [n], and still distinct from [1] (just as "witness" has these senses in English).  And, in that context, it's not only the reading that may prefer あかし, but the kanji form itself as 証し (with the し）. All modern refs use this form.

Also note, sankoku gives *only* 証し. So while 証 might have some historical weight as あかし, it doesn't appear to be the preferred form today, and looking at Christian websites, し seems to appear explicitly. (though it is hard to search for usage without it).

I am grateful that [3] is here, even though the kokugos don't call it out. I hope I don't inadvertently push you to remove it.  It is specifically relevant to the context I just encountered it. A mystical villain appears who goes by the name "sloth"(怠惰), identifies himself as one of 6 disciples of a powerful witch (the central mysterious antagonist of the series) structured around the 7 deadly sins, carries a black Bible-like book he calls his 福音(gospel), speaks constantly of the witch's love, and describes the book using 証し(subtitled with this orthography).  The relevance to Christianity is unmistakable.  If we didn't have [3] here, I'd miss the weight of the vocabulary choice entirely.

As he repeats 証し 証し 証し in Japanese, the English translation is "proof".   Later he describes the book as 寵愛の証し, which is subbed "proof of love". This may overlap adequately with [1].  

This is one of the later senses of "witness" in the dictionary:
openly profess one's religious faith.
"one of the purposes of his coming was to nerve the disciples to witness to Jesus"

I think there may also be some nuance differences that cannot be identified with しょう and おかし stuck together in [1]. (I'm not sure if "proof of love" especially needs to be called out, but there do seem to be reasons for preferring one term over the other).

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>testament (to something)</gloss>
@@ -37,0 +39 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -39 +41,8 @@
-<gloss>to testify (usu. Christian religious context)</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2859122">証し人</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2859122">証し人</xref>
+<field>&Christn;</field>
+<s_inf>usu. 証し</s_inf>
+<gloss>witnessing</gloss>
+<gloss>testifying</gloss>
+<gloss>testimony</gloss>

Quite a bit of discussion in 2007 about sense 3. Interesting comment from Kanji Haitani:
"Not an amendment, just a comment.
証する is usually read しょうする。
証す　is read あかす。
It appears that 証する　is read あかしする　only in the Christian Church in Japan. e.g.
福音をを証する（あかしする）。　神の愛を証する（あかしする）。"

I think that the "equal terms" is coming from the adverbs such as 互角に and 堂々と. If it was implicit in 渡り合う, why would they be added? Both the JEs and kokugos have them.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>to fight (with) on equal footing</gloss>
+<gloss>to fight (with)</gloss>

sankoku:
たがいに（対等に）〈切り合う／戦う〉。
daijr:
相手になって争う。応戦する。
「チャンピオンと互角に━・う」
meikyo:
相手になって戦う。
daijs:
相手になって戦う。
「格上のチームと互角に―・う」
obunsha:
刀できりあう。また、激しく競い合う。
「強豪と互角に―」
iwanami:
相手になって切り合う、または争う。激しく論じ合う。
「互角に―」
koujien:
相手になって斬りあう。（強い相手と対等に）戦う。
gg5:
►互角に渡り合う　prove oneself ┏a match [a worthy opponent, no mean foe]
・堂々と渡り合う　compete [vie] fairly and squarely 《with…》

i don't think it's over-interpreting
sankoku and koujien explicitly say that it's fighting on equal terms, most kokugos use "相手になる" which basically means the same thing in this context and generally all dictionaries go out of their way to use "互角に" in examples

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>to fight (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>to fight (with) on equal footing</gloss>

That qualification isn't in any of the JEs. I think it's over-interpreting what's in the kokugos.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>to fight (with) on equal footing</gloss>
+<gloss>to fight (with)</gloss>

sankoku, daijr/s, smk

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>to fight (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>to fight (with) on equal footing</gloss>

"debate" seems a bit tame here. I think it should go further down.

@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>to debate</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>to debate</gloss>

luminous, wisdom, genius, daij

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>half share</gloss>
+<gloss>half portion</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +16,3 @@
+<gloss>inexperienced</gloss>
+<gloss>green</gloss>
+<gloss>poor (work)</gloss>
@@ -19 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>no good</gloss>

GG5, n-grams.

Adjectival sense.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

GG5

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

sankoku, daijr/s, gg5

@@ -16 +16,4 @@
-<gloss>half a man</gloss>
+<gloss>useless</gloss>
+<gloss>incompetent</gloss>
+<gloss>worthless</gloss>
+<gloss>no good</gloss>

GG5: 比類のない peerless; matchless; unrivaled; unparalleled; beyond [without] compare; incomparable; without (an) equal; without (a) 「parallel [peer]; unequaled
比類のない	19046	90.7%
比類の無い	1955	9.3%

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>比類の無い</keb>
@@ -15 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>unparallelled</gloss>
@@ -17 +19 @@
-<gloss>unmatched</gloss>
+<gloss>matchless</gloss>
@@ -19 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>unrivalled</gloss>

Top reverso glosses(some apparent preference differences between の and non-の forms):
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/比類ない
unparalleled: 242
incomparable: 168
unmatched: 138
unrivaled/unrivalled: 60
unique: 29
peerless: 22


https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/比類ない
Unparalleled: 50+
Unmatched: 40+
unrivalled + unrivaled = 15
exceptional, incomparable ~10 each
unsurpassed ~7
peerless: 2

Some example collocations from yourei:
"incomparable" or "unparalleled" beauty (super common)
unparalleled accuracy (of a gps system)
unparalleled/unrivalled influence (of an advisor, over a king)
"love for humanity" (maybe "unrivalled")
a particular child's "unmatched" affection toward his mother in all of Japan
"love of singing"
"military power" (unparalleled, unrivalled)
"incident" ("unprecedented" I think)
variety of changes in diversity in a river (比類のない多種多様の変化)
an exquisite sword (peerless, matchless?)
excellent handwriting (google gives "incomparably excellent")

Had an intuition to add "incomparable" (with the accent con "co") to 類いない, just based on the kanji.  Then I saw 類いない was a relatively uncommon term, and that this was a more common synonym.

There are contexts where all these glosses apply, but it seems like "unparalleled; incomparable; unmatched" should lead, given both the literal nuance, and the frequency in reverso.  I wouldn't mind trimming beyond that.

It also seems there's a time and a place for the gloss "beyond compare" or "without compare". Especially as 比類なく ...

Seems we usually do: unparalleled; unparallelled , and unrivaled/unrivalled

@@ -13,0 +14,6 @@
+<gloss>unparalleled</gloss>
+<gloss>unparallelled</gloss>
+<gloss>incomparable</gloss>
+<gloss>unmatched</gloss>
+<gloss>unrivaled</gloss>
+<gloss>unrivalled</gloss>
@@ -16,2 +22 @@
-<gloss>unparalleled</gloss>
-<gloss>unchallenged</gloss>
+<gloss>unprecedented</gloss>

OK, I'll make that version and close this

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2847824">比類ない・ひるいない</xref>

比類のない	19046 - in 中辞典
比類ない	19436 - in ルミナス

If we want 比類ない it should be another entry (avoids mucking up the sound clips.)

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>比類ない</keb>
+<keb>比類のない</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ひるいない</reb>
+<reb>ひるいのない</reb>
@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<gloss>unique</gloss>
+<gloss>unparalleled</gloss>
+<gloss>unchallenged</gloss>

Daijisen

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>比類のない</keb>
+<keb>比類ない</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ひるいのない</reb>
+<reb>ひるいない</reb>

Iwanami's kokugo is the only one I know which does both 他自 and 自他. By the way, Iwakoku and shinsen kokugo jiten are also the only ones (that I know of) with の-adjective tags like we have.

I'm not saying we should change our policy, but I'll just note that iwakoku has 自他 on this word.

We always put vt first (the kokugos always put 自 first). The order doesn't indicate whether transitive or intransitive usage is more common.
I see that GG5 and meikyo have transitive examples.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -20 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>

憤慨	251263
憤慨し	129687	 

How to resent something？:
と憤慨し	23509	 
に憤慨し	27659	  
を憤慨し	911	 yikes....

を憤慨	3235	  
を憤慨さ	1870	  
を憤慨させ	1246	 <- e.g. "made me resent"
を憤慨し	911	 

憤慨さ	8818　<- causative, made someone resent

zero hits:
site:mainichi.jp "を憤慨し"

1~2 hundred hits:
site:mainichi.jp "憤慨し"

Swapped [vi,vt]. That's it.  Maybe usually not so important, or paid attention to, but [vi] so low that pedagogically I'd rather pretend it didn't exist. But oh well.

sankoku agrees 自他さ

ngrams show 130,000 strait suru uses, 911 straight transitive uses. Usual particle is に or と, not を.

を　uses usually causative:
a mainichi を hit for させる "made me resent":
しかし、それよりもさらに私を憤慨させたのが何か分かるだろうか

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -20 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>

I prefer this.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>loud laughter (esp. by several people)</gloss>
+<gloss>loud laughter (esp. by a group of people)</gloss>

Clearer? Just crowd by itself...

@@ -12,3 +12 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>loud laughter (esp. by a crowd)</gloss>
+<gloss>loud laughter (esp. by several people)</gloss>

OK

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>loud laughter (esp. by a crowd of people)</gloss>
+<gloss>loud laughter (esp. by a crowd)</gloss>

悔やしい	727

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>悔やしい</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

"envious" is not showing up in references. I don't think the case for adding is strong. It would have to a different sense, anyway.

@@ -31 +30,0 @@
-<gloss>envious</gloss>

誰かが自分より優れているときに使われる「悔しい」というのは妬む = to envy というのが適切だと思います。

@@ -30,0 +31 @@
+<gloss>envious</gloss>

OK. Done.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,4 +18,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>くちおしい</reb>
-<re_restr>口惜しい</re_restr>

悔しい	1908510
口惜しい	45087
くちおしい	418


mk says 口惜しい is やや古い言い方 - and 口惜しい is an rK for くやしい, but of not for くちおしい. Could we split out くちおしい 
 into it's own entry with a [dated] tag and tag 口惜しい in this entry as rK?

類を見ない	243,598
類まれ	        48,625		
類のない	        32,275

At least three forms we'd need to list. I don't think a note is helpful here. The x-refs are probably sufficient.

@@ -31 +30,0 @@
-<s_inf>often 類い(の)ない, etc.</s_inf>

GG5, 中辞典

I think this is better than "in negative".

@@ -31 +31 @@
-<s_inf>usu. in negative</s_inf>
+<s_inf>often 類い(の)ない, etc.</s_inf>

Just added this note to 比類. Helpful to make the motivation for the xrefs explicit.

@@ -30,0 +31 @@
+<s_inf>usu. in negative</s_inf>

I agree with Stephen.

Lots of questions about this on chiebukuro as well.
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q12189583437
Apparently たぐ.い was added to the 常用 list in 2010. Before that, 類 only had one reading on the list (音: るい).

This chiebukoro user saw 類い written in a recently-published novel written by a famous author. Then after using 類い at work, they were told by a work colleague that 類い is incorrect because it's written as 類 in kojien.

The impression that I get is that 類 is the most commonly used form, but the government is trying to promote 類い in official writing due to the ambiguity with るい. It seems this style hasn't yet entirely caught on, however.

I think it's clear from the glosses.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<misc>&sens;</misc>

Just to be clear, the point being made by sankoku is that the word contains a sexist nuance in addition to being disparaging.
I think the question is whether this deserves special mention in jmdict or if it's already clear from the glosses.

sankoku: 偏見をふくんだ言い方。

To me it sounds more [derog] than [sens].
I don't think we normally use either tag when the glosses are plainly disparaging.

Is that tag needed? It's a bit obvious.

sankoku

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&sens;</misc>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 〜なき, 〜ない, etc.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. as 〜なき, 〜のない, etc.</s_inf>

比類	128482	  
比類なき	62918	  
比類ない	19436	  
比類のない	19046

I think this is better than "in negative" for a noun.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<s_inf>usu. in negative</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. 〜なき, 〜ない, etc.</s_inf>

比類	128482	  
比類なき	62918	  
比類の	21556	  
比類ない	19436	  
比類のない	19046	  
比類無き	6451	  
比類なく	4184	  
比類が	3954	  
比類がない	2464	  
比類の無い	1955

We have the same sort of xref, but without the note, on the synonym 類い.

Note copied from 為す術, in case this isn't the right wording. (not a negative verb or a negative sentence, *usually* just なき なく ない pretty much...)  First page of yourei was all negation, with this one extremely elegant non-ない usage:
彼女に比類する美女の数は片手の指を超えまい

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1483690">比類のない</xref>
+<s_inf>usu. in negative</s_inf>

daij, gg5, prog, luminous

I think sense 2 needs a bit more detail.

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>checking a person's identity</gloss>
+<gloss>checking someone's identity</gloss>
+<gloss>identification (of a suspect)</gloss>
@@ -25 +26 @@
-<gloss>identifying a severed head (of an enemy combatant)</gloss>
+<gloss>identification (by a general) of the severed head of an enemy killed in battle</gloss>

Most JEs only have the identity check sense.

@@ -18,2 +18 @@
-<misc>&hist;</misc>
-<gloss>identifying a severed head (of an enemy combatant)</gloss>
+<gloss>checking a person's identity</gloss>
@@ -25 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>checking a person's identity</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>identifying a severed head (of an enemy combatant)</gloss>

All of the kokugos have our first sense prefaced with "昔、"

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>identifying a severed head</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>identifying a severed head (of an enemy combatant)</gloss>

mk

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

daijr, koj, luminous

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>commandment</gloss>
@@ -18,2 +17,7 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2203940">モーセ五書</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2203940">モーセ五書</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1200700">戒律</xref>
+<field>&Buddh;</field>
+<gloss>precept</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2510700">トーラー</xref>

Proposed alignment with the トーラー entry.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>the Torah (the law of God as revealed to Moses)</gloss>
+<gloss>Torah (first five books of the Hebrew Bible)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ タコ部屋 │ 16,835 │ 74.4% │ - add (sankoku)
│ たこ部屋 │  4,931 │ 21.8% │
│ 蛸部屋　 │    807 │  3.6% │
│ たこべや │     66 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>タコ部屋</keb>
+</k_ele>

GG5, Unidic/ngrams

This is the only form in GG5.

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>たこ部屋</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +17,1 @@
+<gloss>low-quality accommodation for laborers</gloss>

About where we were in 2017.

daijr/s, smk, meikyo, obunsha, koujien

"妖気" is not the "feeling that something bad is about to happen" but a mood/atmosphere that has that "feeling that something bad is about to happen", i think that's an important distinction

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>eerie atmosphere</gloss>
-<gloss>feeling that something bad is about to happen</gloss>
+<gloss>ominous atmosphere</gloss>

I don't think that note works with that gloss.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>eerie atmosphere (feeling that something bad is about to happen)</gloss>
+<gloss>eerie atmosphere</gloss>
+<gloss>feeling that something bad is about to happen</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>eerie atmosphere (omen of something bad about to happen)</gloss>
+<gloss>eerie atmosphere (feeling that something bad is about to happen)</gloss>

Sankoku has むずがる.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<reb>むつかる</reb>
+<reb>むずがる</reb>
@@ -15,2 +15 @@
-<reb>むずがる</reb>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<reb>むつかる</reb>

I don't think [nokanji] is needed for むずがる. Should be marked as irregular.
むつかる is in all the refs. Shouldn't be hidden.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<reb>むずがる</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
+<reb>むつかる</reb>
@@ -16,2 +15,2 @@
-<reb>むつかる</reb>
-<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+<reb>むずがる</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
@@ -23 +22 @@
-<gloss>to fret (esp. of infants and small children)</gloss>
+<gloss>to fret (esp. of a young child)</gloss>

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>to fret (esp. infants and small children)</gloss>
+<gloss>to fret (esp. of infants and small children)</gloss>

むずかる	3588	61.4%
むつかる	502	8.6%
むずがる	1756	30.0%

I suggest merging むずがる (2783380) here, and making 憤る [rK] (I feel like [sK] but the kokugos have it.)
If approved, 2783380 needs to be deleted.

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<reb>むずがる</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -12,0 +17 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -17 +21,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1504640">憤る・いきどおる</xref>
@@ -19,2 +23 @@
-<s_inf>this kanji reading is restricted to infants, small children, etc.</s_inf>
-<gloss>to fret</gloss>
+<gloss>to fret (esp. infants and small children)</gloss>

Maybe I shouldn't copy/paste the whole explanation, but who knows which site will outlive which, and it's a good set of comments.  

辞書によると憤るの訓読みは「いきどおる」と「むずかる」がありますけど...
https://ja.hinative.com/questions/13468854
「むずかる」の読みは常用指定されていないので、公文書や新聞などではひらがな書きされます。
一般の使用に制約はありませんが、マンガやラノベ以外の本は読んだことか無いような人も増えており、「憤る」に「むずかる」の読みがあることを知らない、とか、そもそも憤る赤ん坊自体見たことがない、などということも（書き手の側も含め）珍しくはないと思います
2
上述の通り、公文書、新聞では必ずひらがな書きされますので、「憤る」と漢字交じりで書かれていたら、必ず「いきどおる」です。一般の書物では文脈で判断するしかありませんが、「むずかる」は乳幼児か、乳幼児に擬せられた者に対してしか使われませんから、判別は容易だと思います

I can't mark kanji forms [rK] on a [uk] entry, but I'm pretty sure [oK] still applies.   If the random hinative reference is to be believed, this is a word with an official orthography, and it's hiragana. 憤る in a newspaper will *always* be いきどおる.

As some confirmation, sankoku does not give kanji for this term at all (and it contains some crazy kanji, like 憤懣).  Everything I've looked at suggests 憤る will be taken as いきどおる in modern Japanese, and even in old texts, 憤る will only be read as むずかる when discussing babies and small children specifically. (sankoku says "小さい子供などが"...)

Right now 憤る appears to have an ambiguous reading(which is exactly why the hinative question was posed).  It would appear that it's not really that ambiguous, and we can easily clarify this for anyone who sees both 憤る entries here.

More stats on backref (I started there first before finding the hinative details).  I recommend merging.  We don't *usually* have standalone entries for prescriptive "mistakes", and the kokugos identify the backref as a common misunderstanding/error, which might be better as [sK] or [io] to here.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1504640">憤る・いきどおる</xref>
@@ -16,0 +19 @@
+<s_inf>this kanji reading is restricted to infants, small children, etc.</s_inf>

〈卒／そつ／ソツ〉〈が／の〉〈無／な〉い

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ そつの無い │  1,720 │  7.5% │
│ ソツの無い │  1,106 │  4.8% │ - add, sK
│ 卒のない　 │  1,212 │  5.3% │ - add, iK
│ 卒の無い　 │    378 │  1.6% │ - add, sK
│ そつのない │ 10,950 │ 47.5% │
│ ソツのない │  7,698 │ 33.4% │
├─ーーーーー─┼────────┼───────┤
│ そつが無い │  1,012 │  7.5% │
│ ソツが無い │    800 │  5.9% │
│ 卒がない　 │    656 │  4.8% │
│ 卒が無い　 │    271 │  2.0% │
│ そつがない │  7,077 │ 52.2% │
│ ソツがない │  3,747 │ 27.6% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

Same edit that I made on the -が- version

@@ -4,0 +5,4 @@
+<keb>卒のない</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +10,8 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ソツの無い</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>卒の無い</keb>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog

More glosses.
Doesn't conjugate.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +22,4 @@
+<gloss>tactful</gloss>
+<gloss>prudent</gloss>
+<gloss>faultless</gloss>
+<gloss>perfect</gloss>

An attempt at improving the entry. 

I don't really like any of those gg5 glosses and would rather see them gone.

@@ -23,5 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>snapping back (at someone)</gloss>
-<gloss>lashing out (despite being in the wrong)</gloss>
-<gloss>counterblast</gloss>
-<gloss>counteroffensive</gloss>
-<gloss>backlash</gloss>
+<gloss>snapping back (at someone) despite being in the wrong</gloss>
+<gloss>getting mad back</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 逆ギレ　　 │ 235,273 │ 60.0% │
│ 逆切れ　　 │ 155,667 │ 39.7% │
│ 逆ぎれ　　 │     941 │  0.2% │ - sK
│ ぎゃくギレ │     152 │  0.0% │ - drop
│ ぎゃくぎれ │     182 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,4 +14,0 @@
-<reb>ぎゃくギレ</reb>
-<re_restr>逆ギレ</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -19,2 +15,0 @@
-<re_restr>逆切れ</re_restr>
-<re_restr>逆ぎれ</re_restr>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

〈ご／御〉〈多／他／た〉〈分／聞／ぶん〉に〈漏／洩／も〉れず

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ ご多分にもれず　 │ 18,376 │ 16.6% │ - sK
│ ご多分に漏れず　 │ 54,033 │ 48.7% │ - move up
│ 御多分に漏れず　 │  5,798 │  5.2% │ - sK
│ ご多分に洩れず　 │  2,222 │  2.0% │ - keeping visible to show the 洩 kanji uasge
│ 御多分に洩れず　 │  1,959 │  1.8% │ - sK
│ 御多分にもれず　 │  3,527 │  3.2% │ - sK
│ ご他聞にもれず　 │  7,444 │  6.7% │ - add, sK
│ ご他聞に漏れず　 │  5,783 │  5.2% │ - add, sK
│ ご多聞に漏れず　 │  2,769 │  2.5% │ - add, sK
│ ご多聞にもれず　 │  2,714 │  2.4% │ - add, sK
│ ごたぶんに漏れず │  1,112 │  1.0% │ - add, sK
│ ご他聞に洩れず　 │    495 │  0.4% │
│ 御他聞に漏れず　 │    455 │  0.4% │
│ 御多聞にもれず　 │    343 │  0.3% │
│ 御他聞にもれず　 │    342 │  0.3% │
│ 御多聞に漏れず　 │    340 │  0.3% │
│ ご多聞に洩れず　 │    297 │  0.3% │
│ 御他聞に洩れず　 │    104 │  0.1% │
│ 御多聞に洩れず　 │     87 │  0.1% │
│ ごたぶんに洩れず │     76 │  0.1% │
│ 御たぶんにもれず │     27 │  0.0% │
│ ご他分に漏れず　 │     23 │  0.0% │
│ ごたぶんにもれず │  2,583 │  2.3% │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,3 +4,0 @@
-<keb>ご多分にもれず</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -9,3 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>御多分に漏れず</keb>
@@ -16,0 +11,8 @@
+<keb>ご多分にもれず</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>御多分に漏れず</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -17,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +24,21 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ご他聞にもれず</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ご他聞に漏れず</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ご多聞に漏れず</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ご多聞にもれず</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ごたぶんに漏れず</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -19,0 +19,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>御多分にもれず</keb>
+</k_ele>

Entry created

gg5

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>the strength of one's muscles</gloss>
+<gloss>muscular strength</gloss>

Meikyo, shinsen, and sankoku have 文 tags.

Sounds like this is nearly synonymous to 腕力, but shinmeikai explains that it originally applied to all muscles / parts of the body (not just the arms).

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 膂力 │   6,523 │  4.0% │
│ 腕力 │ 156,895 │ 96.0% │
╰─ーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>

Entry created

gg5:〔聖書の初めの 5 書〕 the Pentateuch; the Five Books of Moses.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torah
"It is known as the Pentateuch or the Five Books of Moses by Christians."

I think this is better. 
I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1739010">律法・2</xref>
-<gloss>first five books of the Bible, traditionally attributed to Moses</gloss>
+<gloss>Pentateuch</gloss>
+<gloss>Five Books of Moses</gloss>
@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>Pentateuch</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -12,3 +12,5 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1739010">律法</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1739010">律法</xref>
-<gloss>Pentateuch (first five books of the Bible, traditionally attributed to Moses)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1739010">律法・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1739010">律法・2</xref>
+<gloss>first five books of the Bible, traditionally attributed to Moses</gloss>
+<gloss>Torah</gloss>
+<gloss>Pentateuch</gloss>

Entry created

集中局	1531

Original gloss rather opaque.

@@ -12,5 +12 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
-<gloss>Toll Center</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>centralised office</gloss>

https://context.reverso.net/翻訳/日本語-英語/集中局
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/普通郵便局#地域区分局・起点局・集中局

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>sectional center (for mail processing)</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

GG5

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>efficiency test</gloss>

https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/性能評価
performance evaluation 117 matches
performance assessment 16


性能評価	196923	45.7%
ベンチマーク	234252	54.3%

Took the two most common reverso glosses that were also in eijiro.  This term is not limited to computing. Either gloss would be fine in computing.  Image searches are about evaluating *housing* performance. Didn't look into it further.

No need for "benchmark" as a gloss.  The current Japanese word for computer benchmark is "ベンチマーク". No major harm translating a computer benchmarking situation as "performance evaluation", even if this was the only translation in texts from the 90s.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
-<gloss>benchmark</gloss>
+<gloss>performance evaluation</gloss>
+<gloss>performance assessment</gloss>

Entry created

ルミナス

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>formalization</gloss>

daijr/s, obunsha, shinjirin, koujien

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -13,5 +16,2 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>to stylize</gloss>
-<gloss>to conventionalize</gloss>
+<gloss>conventionalization</gloss>
+<gloss>standardization</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1916360">類のない・るいのない</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1916360">類のない</xref>
@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>unparallelled</gloss>
@@ -27 +26 @@
-<gloss>unrivalled</gloss>
+<gloss>matchless</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/類い無い
比較対象がない（くらい甚だしい）、という意味の表現。
「比類ない」ともいう。<---- xref
読み方：たぐいない
別表記：類い無い、類ない、類無い

類いない	217	0.3%
類ない	660	0.9%
たぐいのない	236	0.3%
たぐいない	552	0.8%
=== るい forms
類のない	32275	44.4%
比類のない	19046	26.2%
比類ない	19436	26.7%
るいのない	48	0.1%
るいない	202	0.3%


https://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/たぐいない
他に比べるものがない。

類いない over　類ない in deference the the official movement to change the orthography. I did read the whole conversation on たぐい, Quite interesting.

I xreffed 比類ない without の due to structural similarity, but my intention is that it be aligned with 比類のない, which I have currently edited as:
  unparalleled; unparallelled; incomparable; unmatched; unrivaled; unrivalled; peerless; unique; unprecedented

Do we think the meaning here is distinct from the xref? (it does not seem so to me).  Do we try to give more dated/formal glosses for more formal/dated terms (like preferring "matchless" and "peerless" over "unparalleled" and "unmatched")?  Maybe that's better?

I don't know which users will pay attention, but the fact that 類ない and 類のない apparently have different readings on 類 is quite shocking. (the latter commonly るい, hence the high ngrams).  That xref is more of a warning than anything else.　I made the reading explicit, otherwise it will be unnoticed.

sankoku gives all of たぐい(類い) as 文(and gives no collocations). Given the frequency on this term vs. the xrefs, this seems fair at least on this structure.　Also [rare]-ish.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>類ない</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,2 +19,9 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>matchless</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2847824">比類ない</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1916360">類のない・るいのない</xref>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<gloss>unparalleled</gloss>
+<gloss>unparallelled</gloss>
+<gloss>incomparable</gloss>
+<gloss>unmatched</gloss>
+<gloss>unrivaled</gloss>
+<gloss>unrivalled</gloss>

n-grams (3:1)

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Entry created

Proposing a merge with  むずかる.

https://furigana.info/w/憤
いきどお	41.6%
おこ	25.5%
いきどほ	9.8%
いか	6.3%
む	5.2% <--- 憤ッと
いきどほり	3.5%
いきど	1.7%
いきどおり	1.7%
じ	0.9%
いかり	0.4%
むっ	0.4%
おそ	0.4%
むく	0.4%
むつ	0.2%
いき	0.2%
いきどう	0.2%
じれ	0.2%
すね	0.2%
ふん	0.2%
ぷ	0.2%
ぷん	0.2%
むず	0.2%

Somebody stuck the kanji next to this form (once, maybe, in all of history...)
https://ameblo.jp/field-day-jikkouiinn/entry-12787009673.html
「憤る（むずがる）」や、「難しい（むずかしい）」などです。

I see this has been previously discussed.

Recommend doing the merge previously considered, with むずかる being marked as irregular/erroneous/nonstandard in some way.  Extra datapoint: sankoku does not give kanji *at all* for the xref むずかる(and has no entry at all for むずがる). More comments at xref, but in modern Japanese neither むずかる nor もずがる have a kanji form(except maybe in old texts, or as a curiosity). No one should *choose* use use 憤 to write either, unless they are deliberately playing games.

On furigana.info,  憤 is basically never used for this reading. The 0.2% むず at the bottom is someone who wrote 憤かり, which is not a standard orthography anyway.

For the moment marked [col] for lack of anything else.  It's prescriptively an error. here's asahi shinbun telling their readers they're wrong:
http://www.asahi.com/special/kotoba/quiz/SDI201505204648.html

Of course, the fact that such an article exists is a testament to the fact that this *is* a word in practice. Still, I think it could be comfortably merged into the xref, and benefit from one set of notes/xrefs.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

Could go either way. I'm tempted to merge with むずかる as "nokanji". むずかる has to be "uk".

http://www.practical-japanese.com/2010/10/blog-post_8121.html
Hits:
"憤る（むずかる）" 1.1k
"憤る（むずがる）" 0

Could possibly be combined with むずかる. Though the ref doesn't give the kanji (憤る) as a headword, so I'm not sure if someone would actually write 憤る with the reading むずがる.
Also, this would presumably be [uk] if it were given the kanji, while I'm not sure if むずかる should be [uk] or not (due to 憤る hits for いきどおる confusing things).

sankoku, jitsuyou

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>

Jitsuyo: 詩や小説などで比喩的に用いられる。

I don't think either is appropriate.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&joc;</misc>

Jitsuyo

or at least col

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&joc;</misc>

GG5

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>several moments of time</gloss>
+<gloss>a few moments</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22 +23 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2150710">為す術もない</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2150710">なすすべもない</xref>
@@ -24 +25 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 〜もない, 〜もなく, etc.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. as 〜もない, 〜もなく, etc.</s_inf>

なす術	31751	27.3% <- adding
為す術	20360	17.5%
為すすべ	6381	5.5%
為術	48	0.0%
なすすべ	57791	49.7%

I know I put it in originally, but I don't think we should say "in negative" for a noun.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>なす術</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20 +24 @@
-<s_inf>usu. in negative</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. 〜もない, 〜もなく, etc.</s_inf>

為す術	20360
為すすべ	6381
為術	48
なすすべ	57791

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu. in negative</s_inf>

実用日本語表現辞典 https://www.weblio.jp/content/為す術

Indeed.

The reading appears to have been a mistake. 悲劇役者 (ひげきやくしゃ) is seemingly also a common term. Should a different entry be created for it?

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ひげきやくしゃ</reb>
+<reb>ひげきはいゆう</reb>

Theatrical terms tend to be gender neutral these days.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>tragic actor</gloss>
@@ -13,2 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>tragic actor (actress)</gloss>
-<gloss>tragedienne</gloss>

研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版

OK

I don't doubt it's in kod, but it doesn't strike me as a goodgloss. Not a lot of google results forit, and googleimages are all aboutsports. Google image results for 反転攻勢 are all seemingly war-related

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&mil;</field>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>switch to the offensive</gloss>

KOD: a 「switch [change] to 「an attack [the offensive].

I'll move it.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>counteroffensive</gloss>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>counteroffensive</gloss>

Is "switch to the offensive" a particularly good gloss? This word is used by NHK, Mainichi etc. to describe the Ukrainian counteroffensive. I'm not sure "switch to the offensive" needs to be included at all but even if it does, I don't think it should lead.

English N-gram Counts
counteroffensive 33901
counter offensive 5718

Usually one word.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>counter offensive</gloss>
+<gloss>counteroffensive</gloss>

I don't think the ヌンチャク x-ref is needed.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1092340">ヌンチャク</xref>

Let it go.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">kungfu bats</lsource>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>based on Bruce Lee's nunchaku</s_inf>
+<s_inf>named after Bruce Lee's use of nunchaku</s_inf>

Certainly must be an entry. Attempting to trim it a bit.

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<s_inf>named from their similarity to nunchaku, famously used by Bruce Lee</s_inf>
-<gloss>two small plastic baseball bats connected with a chain (struck against each other as a percussion instrument during sports chants)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1092340">ヌンチャク</xref>
+<s_inf>based on Bruce Lee's nunchaku</s_inf>
+<gloss>two small plastic baseball bats connected with a chain (struck against each other during sports chants)</gloss>

GG5: a double disaster.
●悪天候で二重遭難の危険性があるので救援隊の出発は延期となった. There being a risk of a double disaster in the bad weather, the rescue team's departure has been postponed.
二重遭難	1473

kenkyuusha
persona 3 videogame -> https://i.imgur.com/a36d3n2.jpeg

止句	0
止め句	0
とめく	526

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>words or phrases not allowed (in waka and haikai poems)</gloss>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>words or phrases not allowed (in waka and haikai)</gloss>

daijr/s, obunsha, nikk, koujien

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>entrance fee (to see a movie, performance, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>entrance fee (for a movie, performance, etc.)</gloss>

Yes, I saw it being used for observing maiko too. I think it's broader than just a ticket to something.

I don't think "appreciation fee" works at all. If that's on Reverso it's a good reminder to take the translations on there with a pinch of salt. I don't like "observation fee" either - it's too literal, and googling it I just get Japanese pages.

I came across the word in reference to maiko dance shows, but most hits are for movie theaters. In those cases, "ticket price" would obviously be the best translation, so I think it should stay.

@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>observation fee (for a performance, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>appreciation fee</gloss>
-<gloss>entrance fee</gloss>
+<gloss>entrance fee (to see a movie, performance, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>ticket price</gloss>

Reverso

Suggesting some changes. The Reverso matches are interesting.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>cost (to watch a performance, movie at the movie theater, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>observation fee (for a performance, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>appreciation fee</gloss>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>ticket price</gloss>

鑑賞料	1954
not entirely obvious from the 鑑賞 entry ("appreciation fee")

https://av.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news/1505340.html
松竹、東急も映画鑑賞料を値上げ。

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/普通郵便局
区分局	2465

It seems regional sorting center is 地域区分局. Not obvious from the parts.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>regional sorting center</gloss>
+<gloss>(post office) sorting center</gloss>

https://eikaiwa.dmm.com/uknow/questions/136993/

gg5, prog

I don't think the note is helpful. It's just a nominalizing の.

@@ -20,3 +20,2 @@
-<s_inf>usu. の〜</s_inf>
-<gloss>taking advantage of...</gloss>
-<gloss>under the pretence of...</gloss>
+<gloss>taking advantage of ...</gloss>
+<gloss>using ... as an excuse</gloss>

GG5: -をいいことに 
●偶然の成功をいいことに彼らはまた同じ作戦に出た. Following up on [Flushed with] their accidental success, they embarked on the same strategy again.
のをいいことに	103290
をいいことに	174724
のをいい事に	17508
をいい事に	28300
を良い事に	15887
をよいことに	5123
を好い事に	186
5 Tanaka sentences

I think it's worth having. Moving the の to a note. I'll reindex the sentences if this gets agreement.

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>をいい事に</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>を良い事に</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -5 +11,5 @@
-<reb>のをいいことに</reb>
+<reb>をいいことに</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>をよいことに</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -9 +19,4 @@
-<gloss>to take advantage of...</gloss>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu. の〜</s_inf>
+<gloss>taking advantage of...</gloss>
+<gloss>under the pretence of...</gloss>

We have a usage note describing this pattern in the entry for いい事

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>のをいいことに</keb>
-</k_ele>

https://jlptsensei.com/learn-japanese-grammar/をいいことに-o-ii-koto-ni-meaning/

don't know if this should be like that or just いいことに , but I think it's a grammar pattern worth including in the dictionary.

I agree. A+B and not particularly common.

I don't think this is needed. Few web hits. 担務 is now an entry.

担務表	66
担務	5801

I've proposed an entry for 担務. Maybe this is not needed but 表 has multiple meanings.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1489350">表・ひょう・1</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
@@ -13 +15 @@
-<gloss>table showing distribution of duties between employees</gloss>
+<gloss>table of employee duties</gloss>

daijs: 組織内で、業務を分担して受け持つこと。「—変更」「複数の業務を—する」
jitsuyo: 組織において担当する任務ならびにその責任範囲。職務、職責。

@@ -12,3 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>duties</gloss>
-<gloss>responsibilities</gloss>
-<gloss>division of tasks</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>one's duties (in an organization)</gloss>
+<gloss>one's responsibilities</gloss>
+<gloss>taking charge of (a duty)</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/担務 Jitsuyo
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/担務/  Daijs
Unidic
担務	5801