I think it's best without a (partial) set of field tags.

@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
-<field>&econ;</field>
-<field>&bus;</field>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benchmarking
Benchmarking is the practice of comparing business processes and performance metrics to industry bests and best practices from other companies. Dimensions typically measured are quality, time and cost.

https://www.nera.com/practice-areas/transfer-pricing/economic-benchmarking.html
Economic benchmarking analysis is a technique for establishing the arm's length profits of a controlled entity by reference to the profitability of one or more uncontrolled entities determined to be comparable to the controlled entity of interest with respect to functions performed, assets employed, and risks taken.

Econ:
https://www.smbcnikko.co.jp/terms/japan/he/J0134.html
ベンチマーク(Benchmark）とは、投資信託などが運用の指標としている基準のことです。多くの場合、投資信託が投資対象とする商品や市場の各種指数が用いられます。たとえば、日本株式に投資する投資信託であれば、TOPIXや日経平均株価などの指数がこれに当たります。

Business (Wikipedia's claim that ベンチマーキング　and ベンチマーク are somehow cleanly separated notwithstanding)
https://www.tableau.com/ja-jp/learn/articles/what-is-benchmark
https://next-sfa.jp/journal/others/bench-mark/
IT業界におけるベンチマークの意味とは？
自動車業界におけるベンチマークの意味とは？
投資分野におけるベンチマークの意味とは？
経営分野においてのベンチマークの意味とは？

Obviously [comp]. I don't know if this is so many fields that you'd prefer to not tag any of them.  Note: we have a "benchmark" term in a different field, surveying:


水準原点 primary benchmark (surveying); fundamental benchmark

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<field>&econ;</field>
+<field>&bus;</field>

Serves no real purpose.

ベンチマーク	234252	100.0%
ベンチマークタスク	0	0.0%

One reverso:
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/ベンチマークタスク
定期処理ベンチマーク　タスクです。
Periodic benchmark tasks.

not a super-common collocation, A+B in English and in Japanese.  Totally understandable without this entry.

I'm not sure if this falls into a specific field either.  Way simpler to delete than identify fields properly.

Here's a pdf from computing:
https://www.scsk.jp/sp/sysdig/whitepaper/upload/SysdigSecureBenchmark.pdf

It's just addressing the computer program ("task") that runs the benchmark.  (i.e., it's nothing special)

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ベンチマーク・タスク</reb>

According to sankoku, みどりご is uk. Splitting it out.

@@ -7,7 +6,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>みどり児</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>緑児</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -16,4 +8,0 @@
-<re_restr>嬰児</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>みどりご</reb>

daijr/s and koj have 緑児 for みどりご, but the smaller kokugos don't mention it.
I think it can be [rK] here.

緑児	340

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>緑児</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

嬰児	21061	89.8%
みどり児	2395	10.2%

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>みどり児</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<re_restr>嬰児</re_restr>

架空の	675268	  
架空のもの	73961	 
架空なもの	350	  
＝＝＝
架空な	3804	  
架空なの	680	  
架空なん	489	  
架空な彼方へ	302	  
架空な彼方	302

Just [n] in sankoku. [adj-na] not well-supported by ngrams. (adj-no is)

@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

shinsen: 「仮空」と書くのはあやまり。

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 架空　 │ 1,285,562 │ 98.9% │
│ 仮空　 │       471 │  0.0% │ - add, sK
│ かくう │     9,802 │  0.8% │
│ がくう │     3,627 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>仮空</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Hard to tell for that sense.

Aligning.

@@ -49 +49 @@
-<gloss>cucumber sushi wrapped in nori (seaweed)</gloss>
+<gloss>cucumber sushi wrapped in nori</gloss>

Sankoku has a 俗 tag on "excellent swimmer."
Iwakoku has it on "cucumber."

@@ -30,0 +31 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -34,0 +36 @@
+<stagr>カッパ</stagr>
@@ -36,0 +39 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

OK.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">mythical turtle-like humanoid creature with a beak for mouth and a water-filled depression on the top of its head</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">mythical water-dwelling creature</gloss>

I really prefer just the "mythical water-dwelling creature". We don't need to be encyclopedic.

OK, I'll make them all "nori".

I see that for entries containing "nori" in the glosses we sometimes have it alone, sometimes "nori (laver)" and sometimes "nori (seaweed)". I suggest we just have "nori". I'm sure users either know what it is, or can look it up.
I'll leave this open in case there's discussion. Depending on what we decide, I'll align other entries.

@@ -33 +33 @@
-<gloss>cucumber sushi wrapped in nori (seaweed)</gloss>
+<gloss>cucumber sushi wrapped in nori</gloss>

〈かっぱ／カッパ／河童〉〈巻（き）／まき／マキ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ かっぱ巻き │ 14,681 │ 27.0% │
│ かっぱ巻　 │ 14,207 │ 26.1% │
│ カッパ巻き │  7,808 │ 14.3% │ - sK
│ カッパ巻　 │  7,241 │ 13.3% │ - sK
│ 河童巻　　 │    249 │  0.5% │ - sK
│ 河童巻き　 │    634 │  1.2% │ - rK (daijr/s)
│ 河童まき　 │     28 │  0.1% │
│ 河童マキ　 │      0 │  0.0% │
│ かっぱまき │  8,766 │ 16.1% │
│ カッパマキ │    434 │  0.8% │
│ カッパまき │    416 │  0.8% │ - drop
│ かっぱマキ │      0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+<keb>河童巻き</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,3 +24 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>河童巻き</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,9 +27,0 @@
-<re_restr>かっぱ巻き</re_restr>
-<re_restr>かっぱ巻</re_restr>
-<re_restr>河童巻</re_restr>
-<re_restr>河童巻き</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>カッパまき</reb>
-<re_restr>カッパ巻き</re_restr>
-<re_restr>カッパ巻</re_restr>

河童巻   	249
河童巻き 	634
かっぱ巻き	14681
カッパ巻き	7808
かっぱ巻 	14207
カッパ巻 	7241

@@ -3,0 +4,12 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>かっぱ巻き</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>かっぱ巻</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>カッパ巻き</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>カッパ巻</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +24,9 @@
+<re_restr>かっぱ巻き</re_restr>
+<re_restr>かっぱ巻</re_restr>
+<re_restr>河童巻</re_restr>
+<re_restr>河童巻き</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カッパまき</reb>
+<re_restr>カッパ巻き</re_restr>
+<re_restr>カッパ巻</re_restr>
@@ -14,0 +36,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1665520">巻き寿司</xref>
+<field>&food;</field>
@@ -15,0 +39 @@
+<gloss>cucumber makizushi</gloss>

OK. The text glosser should work on the two components.

外人向け	        11,334		
外国人向け	125,583

I strongly feel this isn't needed. Although isn't not rare, it's not especially common either. I don't think it matters that it's been an entry for years. It's A+B, the meaning is obvious, and 外国人向け is much more common.

外人向け	11334

It's not rare and it's been in the dictionary for 20+ years. I can't see that removing it is an improvement.

We prob don't need this one w the much more common 外国人向け in. A+B

HMMMM...
偽善的な	15469	50.7%
偽善の	15039	49.3%


偽善的な態度	354	100.0%
偽善的の態度	0	0.0%

偽善的なこと	747	95.5% <-- hypocritical things
偽善のこと	35	4.5%  <-- about hypocrasy

偽善的な言葉	457	57.7%  <-- "hypocritical speech"
偽善の言葉	165	20.8%  <-- the word "hypocrisy" maybe, sometimes

偽善的な行動	133	16.8%  <-- hypocritical actions
偽善の行動	37	4.7%　　<-- defining what hypocrisy means? eh.

Changed nothing.

I said on another edit I was going to drop [adj-no] here.  I think 的 is the safe usage (eijiro backs this up 100%), but there seems to by plenty of の usage in the wild, and I did get a reference for it:

https://kotobank.jp/esjaword/hipocrita
小学館 西和中辞典 第2版
[形] 偽善的な，偽善の．
All example sentences used 的. 的 is bold, の is not.

I think that の results are at least inflated by coincidental usage. Such as:
こと example (not adj-no here, I don't believe):
それは彼らの偽善のことです

GG5, etc.

The JEs have 人頼みする examples but the n-grams are quite low for it.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>depending on others</gloss>

Daijisen

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>reliance on others</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>relying on others</gloss>

iwakoku and shinsen have both 付 and 附 forms.
The 附 form also appears in three old (~1900) quotations in nikkoku (entries for 懐中日記, 受領証, and 添付).
It seems to be old and rare rather than irregular.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 添付　 │ 4,010,251 │ 99.6% │
│ 添附　 │    15,953 │  0.4% │ - [iK] to [rK]
│ てんぷ │    28,000 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

Dropping [adj-no] tag.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Correct POS order
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -24 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daij, gg5, prog

Refers to the act of attaching, not the attachment itself.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,5 +24,3 @@
-<gloss>attachment (e.g. email)</gloss>
-<gloss>appendix (e.g. of a report, document, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>annex</gloss>
-<gloss>appendage</gloss>
-<gloss>annexure</gloss>
+<gloss>attaching (documents, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>appending</gloss>
+<gloss>affixing</gloss>

gg5

I think ばか受け can be hidden.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22,0 +24,2 @@
+<gloss>massive success</gloss>
+<gloss>huge hit</gloss>

バカ受け	16739
馬鹿受け	3408
ばか受け	721 gg5

@@ -10,4 +10,3 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>バカうけ</reb>
-<re_restr>バカ受け</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ばか受け</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -16 +14,0 @@
-<re_restr>馬鹿受け</re_restr>
@@ -20,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<re_restr>馬鹿受け</re_restr>

more literal perhaps

@@ -21,2 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>extremely good reception</gloss>
-<gloss>being very well-received</gloss>
+<gloss>ridiculously good reception</gloss>
+<gloss>being extremely well-received</gloss>

sankoku, smk, iwakoku, saito, and the larger kokugos have this second sense.

sankoku has it with a 俗 tag.

@@ -20,0 +21,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>jack of all trades</gloss>
+</sense>

adding AmE gloss

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>fruit and vegetable shop</gloss>

Trying to remove an xref.

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="2842935">仰向き</xref>

GG5, etc. Kokugos

I'm doubtful about うつ向き but probably OK as sK. Drop that xref.
I'll align 俯け - GG5 and other JEs have them identical

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2859127">俯き加減</xref>

俯向き	313	13.8%
うつ向き	1961	86.2%

Ah yes, and the original thing.  俯向き was rare, but not "うつ向き".  Google search (quoted) returns plenty of exactly what you expect (sense[1]). Happy to leave [sK] though, I think it's "wrong".

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>うつ向き</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

俯き	92010	  
俯き加減	62411	 

うつむき加減の	6122	95.3%
うつむきの	300	4.7%

うつむき加減のなりたちってなんですか？
まあ、「加減」≒程度(湯加減)→“そのものずばりではないが、それに近い状態”とでも言っておきましょうか。
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q13119914018

うつむき and うつむき加減 images are not actually distinguishable. The latter seems far more common.

kokugos call this and 仰向き antonyms, but this seems way less common.  Image searches matching [2] are non-existing.  Image searches for 仰向き are all laying face up in bed. 仕方がない I guess.

yourei examples even use 少し俯き加減, which should otherwise be redundant.
少し俯き	1937
少し俯き加減	863 <--- 1937 includes these as well
少し俯きながら	373 <--- and these, which are verbal uses of 少し俯く

@@ -9,0 +10,10 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2859127">俯き加減</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2859127">俯き加減</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2859127">俯き加減</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="2842935">仰向き</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>facing downward</gloss>
+</sense>

Aligning with 俯き.

@@ -14,0 +15,7 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>facing downward</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

G n-grams (just)

俯け	222
俯向け	32
うつむけ	304

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

GG5

“prone” sense

@@ -17,0 +17,1 @@
+<gloss>prone</gloss>

Can drop the ichi1 from the other combinations.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -22 +20,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -27 +24,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -32 +28,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -37 +32,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -42 +36,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>

Sankoku, shinsen, and shinmeikai sharply distinguish the different kanji usages. I've added "esp." sense notes.

〈引（き）／ひき／ヒキ〉〈延（ば）／伸（ば）／のば〉す

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 引き延ばす │ 17,570 │ 38.8% │
│ 引き延す　 │     54 │  0.1% │ - sK
│ 引延ばす　 │    217 │  0.5% │ - [io] to [sK]
│ 引延す　　 │     31 │  0.1% │ - [io] to [sK]
│ 引き伸ばす │ 25,383 │ 56.1% │ - move to top
│ 引き伸す　 │     83 │  0.2% │ - sK
│ 引伸ばす　 │    273 │  0.6% │ - [io] to [sK]
│ 引伸す　　 │      0 │  0.0% │ - [io] to [sK]
│ 引きのばす │    820 │  1.8% │ - sK
│ ひき延ばす │     41 │  0.1% │
│ ひき伸ばす │     23 │  0.1% │
│ ひきのばす │    782 │  1.7% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>引き伸ばす</keb>
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +21 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,5 +26 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>引き伸ばす</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -29,0 +31 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -34 +36 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -39 +41 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -43,0 +46 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -53,0 +57 @@
+<s_inf>esp. 引き伸ばす</s_inf>
@@ -58,0 +63 @@
+<s_inf>esp. 引き伸ばす</s_inf>
@@ -63,0 +69 @@
+<s_inf>esp. 引き延ばす</s_inf>

スーパー大辞林

@@ -54,2 +54,11 @@
-<gloss>to delay</gloss>
-<gloss>to enlarge</gloss>
+<gloss>to stretch larger</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to enlarge (photos)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to delay (e.g. the end of a meeting)</gloss>

@@ -42,0 +42,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>引きのばす</keb>
+</k_ele>

meikyo: 多く「お━」の形で
あつらえ向き	12,553		
おあつらえ向き	11,762

Aliging.

@@ -16,2 +16,3 @@
-<misc>&id;</misc>
-<gloss>perfect</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. お〜</s_inf>
+<gloss>perfect (for)</gloss>
+<gloss>ideal</gloss>
@@ -19 +20 @@
-<gloss>ideal</gloss>
+<gloss>most suitable</gloss>

aligning, all comments at xref.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +15,5 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2535570">おあつらえ向き</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2535570">おあつらえ向き</xref>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>perfect</gloss>
+<gloss>just right</gloss>
@@ -17 +21 @@
-<gloss>most suitable</gloss>
+<gloss>tailor-made</gloss>

GG5, ルミナス, Unidic/ngrams

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>あつらえ向き</keb>
+</k_ele>

About where we were in 2017.

daijr/s, smk, meikyo, obunsha, koujien

"妖気" is not the "feeling that something bad is about to happen" but a mood/atmosphere that has that "feeling that something bad is about to happen", i think that's an important distinction

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>eerie atmosphere</gloss>
-<gloss>feeling that something bad is about to happen</gloss>
+<gloss>ominous atmosphere</gloss>

I don't think that note works with that gloss.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>eerie atmosphere (feeling that something bad is about to happen)</gloss>
+<gloss>eerie atmosphere</gloss>
+<gloss>feeling that something bad is about to happen</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>eerie atmosphere (omen of something bad about to happen)</gloss>
+<gloss>eerie atmosphere (feeling that something bad is about to happen)</gloss>

gg5 has a 電算 tag

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ 圧縮効率　　　　　 │ 6,700 │
│ あっしゅくこうりつ │     0 │
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&comp;</field>

KOD

empirical
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/実証研究
vs
experimental
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/実験研究

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/実証研究
実証研究（じっしょうけんきゅう、英語：empirical research）

Much cleaner eijiro "experimental study" term:
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=実験研究

The jisho.org wikipedia cross-ref pointed this out, and reverso confirms.  "Empirical" does not strictly imply "experimentation", only observation, and 実証 vs 実験 would seem to be the same distinction.  Given that, and that 実験研究 seems perfectly effective for "experimental study" or "experimental research" if that's what you mean, I'm not sure it's actually helpful to keep either of those as a sometimes-maybe gloss(even though eijiro has it. It also has "demonstration research", so... ). 

We do not have 実験研究, might be worth adding, A+B though it may be.

実験研究	27541	37.1%
実証研究	46683	62.9%

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>experimental study</gloss>
+<gloss>empirical research</gloss>

Entry created

I'm always keen to keep the text-glossing functions running appropriately. In this case there'd probably be a partial match with 外国人向け which would work OK.

A+B and far less common than 外国人向け. I can't see a case for keeping this.

I'd keep it.

Reasons given previously, but posted changes just in case as well.

外人向け	11334	8.1%
外人向き	246	0.2%
外国人向け	125583	90.0%
外国人向き	2350	1.7%

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/mojimojimojisuke/e/d7e6157cfca451b66f2e905724217f10
Aimed at/designed for Japanese people:
この辞書は日本人向けです。みなさんにはちょっと難しいと思います。
suitable for foreigners:
　文が易しいです。例文がたくさんあります。この辞書は外国人向きです。

Was going to [adj-no] this, but on further thought, this is pedestrian and A+B and not particularly common vs. other forms we don't have. (We have 外人向け, oddly, but not 外国人向け)..

The gloss is also maybe wrong.  向き vs 向け is subtle indeed, but we actually record the distinction:
向き suited to; suitable for; designed for
向け 1. intended for ...; oriented towards ...; aimed at ...

So "muki" is potentially aimed at many audiences, but not explicitly for foreigners.  I guess. 8 years of Japanese and I don't really know.

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>aimed at foreigners</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>suitable for foreigners</gloss>

Sankoku: 〔雅〕

Most kokugos lead with the 目交(い) form rather than 眼間. Sankoku and smk don't even have 眼間.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────╮
│ 眼間　　 │ 483 │
│ 目交　　 │ 162 │ - add (meikyo, shinsen, smk, koj)
│ 目交い　 │  87 │
│ 目交ひ　 │   0 │
│ まなかい │ 947 │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>目交</keb>
@@ -14,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&poet;</misc>

Entry created

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>coming back (home) to Osaka</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

Entry created

daijisen, sankoku

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────────╮
│ マルチポスト │ 135,937 │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────────╯

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
+<misc>&net-sl;</misc>

Entry created

policy

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>Tokyo bitterling (species of cyprinid fish, Tanakia tanago)</gloss>
+<gloss>Tokyo bitterling (Tanakia tanago)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 都鱮　　　　 │     0 │  0.0% │ - [oK] to [rK] (daijr/s, koj, gg5)
│ みやこたなご │    30 │  0.9% │
│ ミヤコタナゴ │ 3,292 │ 99.1% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Entry created

I think it can go.

ベンチマーク	234252	94.0%
ベンチマークテスト	14599	5.9%
ベンチマーク試験	280	0.1%

I suppose this entry serves the role of saying "use テスト with other katakana loan words, not 試験".  Or delete it.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2329280">ベンチマークテスト</xref>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

Entry created

Agreed.

I don't think this is needed, especially if we're keeping it so general.

Reverso, WWW pages.

I see examples of it being used for entrance tests to educational institutions. It's far too broad to try and use field tags.

@@ -12,2 +11,0 @@
-<field>&engr;</field>
-<field>&agric;</field>
@@ -15 +13 @@
-<gloss>standard test (i.e. against official material standards, safety standards, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>standard test</gloss>

eijiro
基準試験に受かる
pass a standard test

ベンチマーク	234252	99.6%
基準試験	825	0.4%

https://www.weblio.jp/content/基準試験
材料や機械が使えるかどうかを確かめ、配合を決定し、また管理する上で必要な基準になる数値を得る為に実施する試験。

https://doboku.ezwords.net/yougo/基準試験.html
ぴったり土木用語
基準試験とは　（きじゅんしけん）
（standard test）<1>使用材料や使用機械が施工可能か否かを確認する試験。<2>アスファルト混合物の配合を決定し、管理基準値を確認する試験。

I believe this could be related:
https://www.aimil.com/blog/what-is-asphalt-testing-and-why-is-it-necessary/#The_Different_Types_of_Asphalt_Tests_How_They_Work
(a lot of on-site tests to evaluate if the materials meet certain standards)

Materials Testing: Should You Change from the Standard Test Method Approach?
https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=20070

https://seidoublog.com/construction-management2/
使用材料の基準試験
材料の基準試験の項目は、工種ごとに定められています。

I question whether this was ever used in computing, and whether it needs a gloss or xref to ベンチマーク. 　Book results seem to be compatible with the weblio definition, usually having 工事 in the title.

I gave it a go, and I've left what I've found in the refs.  I'm feel "medium" about this gloss.  Just wanted to strip "benchmark".  I put a good amount of effort in, but there's no silver-bullet conclusive reference I can find.  It seems a bit "A+B", where different contexts might yield different, simple-enough interpretations.  This might be one of those "better to delete it than have an incorrect gloss" situations.  

Not in the kokugos that I can see, but eijiro has it in a few places with the simple-but-wholly-ambiguous gloss.

This alignment give a good hint as to one possible sense:

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/idenshi/codex/06/dl/cac_gl72.pdf
選定された基準試験所（reference laboratory)

And here's a good string (which might be a different sense).  I don't have an alignment, but you can kind of see what it is:
「無線LAN等の欧米基準試験データの活用の在り方に関する検討会」
https://twitter.com/MIC_JAPAN/status/1641750016669921280

@@ -12,2 +12,4 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
-<gloss>benchmark (test)</gloss>
+<field>&engr;</field>
+<field>&agric;</field>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>standard test (i.e. against official material standards, safety standards, etc.)</gloss>

Entry created

GG5

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>efficiency test</gloss>

https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/性能評価
performance evaluation 117 matches
performance assessment 16


性能評価	196923	45.7%
ベンチマーク	234252	54.3%

Took the two most common reverso glosses that were also in eijiro.  This term is not limited to computing. Either gloss would be fine in computing.  Image searches are about evaluating *housing* performance. Didn't look into it further.

No need for "benchmark" as a gloss.  The current Japanese word for computer benchmark is "ベンチマーク". No major harm translating a computer benchmarking situation as "performance evaluation", even if this was the only translation in texts from the 90s.

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
-<gloss>benchmark</gloss>
+<gloss>performance evaluation</gloss>
+<gloss>performance assessment</gloss>

Entry created

Daijr: ... 狭義にはモーセ五書をいう。
ルミナス: 	(モーセ五書) the Tora(h).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torah

Maybe a bit of amplification helps. I'll propose tweaks to the 律法 and モーセ五書 entries.

@@ -9,2 +9 @@
-<gloss>Torah</gloss>
-<gloss>Hebrew Bible</gloss>
+<gloss>Torah (first five books of the Hebrew Bible)</gloss>

I'm not sure why "Hebrew Bible" was added as a gloss. The references below explain that the Torah is only part of the Hebrew Bible.

enwiki: Torah has a range of meanings. It can most specifically mean the first five books of the Hebrew Bible. This is commonly known as the 
Written Torah.
brit: The meaning of “Torah” is often restricted to signify the first five books of the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament), also called the Law 
(or the Pentateuch, in Christianity). 
Jewishvirtuallibrary.org: The Torah, or Jewish Written Law, consists of the five books of the Hebrew Bible - known more commonly to non-Jews 
as the "Old Testament"...

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<gloss>Hebrew Bible</gloss>

gg5, prog

I don't think id is appropriate here.
The kokugos don't describe it as polite.

@@ -19,3 +19,2 @@
-<misc>&id;</misc>
-<misc>&pol;</misc>
-<gloss>perfect</gloss>
+<gloss>perfect (for)</gloss>
+<gloss>ideal</gloss>
@@ -23 +22 @@
-<gloss>ideal</gloss>
+<gloss>most suitable</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/ejword/tailored tailor-made
(形)目的[要求、条件、好み]にぴったり合った 〜に適合した 〜に適した あつらえ向きの 注文仕立ての 仮編成済みの

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=あつらえ向き
おあつらえ向きの
形
tailored

の：
おあつらえ向きの場所	198	33.2%
お誂え向きの場所	59	9.9%
御誂え向きの場所	0	0.0%
あつらえ向きの場所	208	34.8%
誂え向きの場所	66	11.1%

な：
おあつらえ向きな場所	32	5.4%
お誂え向きな場所	0	0.0%
御誂え向きな場所	0	0.0%
あつらえ向きな場所	34	5.7%
誂え向きな場所	0	0.0%

To be clear, this looked to me like it *should* be the equivalent to the English idiom "tailor-made", so I went off hunting for that and found someone to agree with me.  誂える is "to have made to order", this feels like an almost-identical derivation in English and Japanese.
 
Wouldn't have edited this all, except for this and the back-ref are the first two terms that come back when searching "ends-with-向き", and they were obviously the same, but not aligned.

I've reversed the xrefs (and not even cross-ref'd).  daijs makes the rare statement: 多く「おあつらえむき」の形で
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/誂え向き/

eijiro only gives おあつらえ向き forms, and if you google あつらえ向き you'll be hard pressed to find it without お.  Book results reveal some unadorned 誂え向き.

I just attempted to remove [pol] from onigiri, so it feels inconsistent to put it here if this is the only form used in practice. But perhaps the whole expression is polite and that's the reason it's here, in which case it's fine. 

Usage with な seems very limited, with very few collocations except 場所.  xref/backref has adj-na there, but I think the entry is better without.

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1808590">誂え向き</xref>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<misc>&pol;</misc>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>tailor-made</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

〈真／ま〉（っ）〈赤／か〉な〈嘘／噓／うそ／ウソ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 真っ赤な嘘　 │ 23,819 │ 56.3% │
│ 真っ赤なウソ │ 13,063 │ 30.9% │
│ 真っ赤なうそ │  2,969 │  7.0% │ - sK
│ まっ赤な嘘　 │    145 │  0.3% │ - sK
│ まっ赤なウソ │    113 │  0.3% │ - sK
│ 真赤な嘘　　 │    359 │  0.8% │ - [io] to [sK]
│ 真赤なウソ　 │    461 │  1.1% │ - [io] to [sK]
│ まっかな嘘　 │    476 │  1.1% │
│ 真赤なうそ　 │     28 │  0.1% │
│ まっ赤なうそ │     27 │  0.1% │
│ まっかなうそ │    266 │  0.6% │
│ まっかなウソ │    555 │  1.3% │ - drop
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21 +24 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -25 +28 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -29,10 +31,0 @@
-<re_restr>真っ赤な嘘</re_restr>
-<re_restr>真っ赤なうそ</re_restr>
-<re_restr>まっ赤な嘘</re_restr>
-<re_restr>真赤な嘘</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>まっかなウソ</reb>
-<re_restr>真っ赤なウソ</re_restr>
-<re_restr>まっ赤なウソ</re_restr>
-<re_restr>真赤なウソ</re_restr>

see 真っ赤

adding [io]

@@ -14,6 +13,0 @@
-<keb>真赤な嘘</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>真赤なウソ</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -24,0 +19,8 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>真赤な嘘</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>真赤なウソ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -28,0 +31 @@
+<re_restr>まっ赤な嘘</re_restr>
@@ -30 +32,0 @@
-<re_restr>まっ赤な嘘</re_restr>
@@ -34,0 +37 @@
+<re_restr>まっ赤なウソ</re_restr>
@@ -36 +38,0 @@
-<re_restr>まっ赤なウソ</re_restr>

The current glosses are in 中辞典 and Eijiro.

I'll add a couple of those.

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>operating on the same wavelength</gloss>
+<gloss>reading each other's minds</gloss>

iwakoku, shinsen, and obunsha have (俗) tags. smk says it is 口頭語的.

Not sure that these glosses capture the nuance correctly. I think this word describes a type of relationship characterized by a high degree of mutual understanding. Something closer to "finishing each other's sentences," "reading each other's minds," "operating on the same wavelength," etc.

The current glosses are closer in meaning to something like "being mentally acute / alert / sharp" or "being able to read the room."

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2073040">ツーと言えばカー・ツーといえばカー</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2073040">ツーと言えばカー</xref>
+<misc>&col;</misc>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2073040">ツーと言えばカー・ツーといえばカー</xref>

Daijr, ルミナス, GG5, 中辞典. N-grams:
つうかあ	3746
ツーカー	96090

Putting it back.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1563610">俯き・1</xref>

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1563610">俯き・1</xref>

仰むき is in GG5, JLD and Goi Taikei, but it gets 0 n0grams.

[sK]?
I'm going to zap the xref temporarily.

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>仰むき</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5 あおむけ, あおむき【仰むけ, 仰むき】entry

--> n

matching gloss from 仰むけ

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>on one's back</gloss>
-<gloss>face up</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1563610">俯き</xref>

From the Japanese dictionary (スーパー大辞林) that comes on Mac computers.

Note the existing entry for 仰向け.

That seems to work to a point, although the "spare the rod" is about avoiding punishment.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>spare the rod, spoil the child</gloss>

non-lit gloss seems cery clumsy to me. Isn't this essentially a variation of かわいい子には旅をさせよ? That's glossed as "spare the rod, spoil the child."

Seems OK.

* jitsuyō: https://www.weblio.jp/content/獅子は我が子を千尋の谷に落とす
* https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q11135252456

獅子は我が子を千尋 560 85.4%
獅子はわが子を千尋  96 14.6%

Closest expression in English is probably "tough love", but not exactly the same.

I agree.

I don't think so. It's virtually unused in Japanese. 庯 is not in any JIS standard.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ベトナムの地方行政区画

Cf. 市社、市鎮

俯き加減	62411	  
俯き加減の	1935	  
俯き加減が	189

I don't think we can class this as adj-no.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

うつむき加減	38500	  
うつむき加減に	12550	  
うつむき加減で	12097	  
うつむき加減の	6122

Cribbed note from a similar term.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<s_inf>oft. as ～で or 〜に</s_inf>

俯き加減	62411
うつむき加減	38500
うつむきかげん	7257

missed a form

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>うつむき加減</keb>

115 examples, all appear to be ~の、～に、and ～で. One exceptional use of な様子 not supported by the ngrams.
https://yourei.jp/俯き加減
Example: その横には、少し俯き加減の玉木が立っている。
Example: 俯き加減の少女の唇から漏れるため息が、白い吐息となって凍えた空気に霧散した。

https://www.weblio.jp/content/俯き加減
顔を少し下へ向けているさま。

nikk: 少しうつむいている様子。うつむきぎみ。

俯き加減	62411	100.0%
俯加減	0	0.0%

俯き加減に	55212	   <-- I think the database has inflated this
俯き加減で	3614	  
俯き加減の	1935	  
俯き加減な	356	  (なので。。。)



俯き加減 とはどういう意味ですか?
https://ja.hinative.com/questions/21808765
少しうつむいている様子
うつむく=顔が下を向く😞

Image search.  Images seem to not *necessarily* imply sadness. 

nikk uses 俯加減, but this isn't used anywhere(maybe 3 non-reference book results?). I would really rather not surface this.

Would be nice to indicate に and で. These both seem more common than の。

That's a fair point. I'd misremembered how sankoku defined the red parentheses. I suspect uk is correct here because 嬰児 is more likely to be read えいじ.
In any case, I think unrelated readings like this are best kept separate if merging them means adding restrictions.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 嬰児　　 │ 21,061 │ 74.3% │
│ みどり児 │  2,395 │  8.4% │ - add
│ 緑児　　 │    340 │  1.2% │
│ みどりご │  4,557 │ 16.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

The appendix in sankoku defines the red colored parentheses as 「仮名書きにして（も）よい」

I'm not sure if it's okay to interpret that as "usually kana," which I think is a little stronger.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>みどり児</keb>

sankoku, smk:〔雅〕

Split from 1173630.

Aligning with our 比丘尼 entry.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>yao bikuni</gloss>
+<gloss>yao bhikkhuni</gloss>

@@ -8 +8,7 @@
-<reb>やおびくに、はっぴゃくびくに、おびくに</reb>
+<reb>やおびくに</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>はっぴゃくびくに</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>おびくに</reb>

Maybe this

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Eight-Hundred Year Nun</gloss>
+<gloss>yao bikuni</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">mythical nun who acquired perpetual youth by consuming mermaid flesh</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/八百比丘尼#概要
https://yokai.com/yaobikuni/

I don't know how to properly phrase this without getting some very long Meaning entry, so I've put that as a placeholder, but I'm sure it can be further improved

It's also in prog and wisdom.

We usually add the ones that are in GG5.

GG5: 偽善的(な) hypocritical; pharisaical.

Not sure. We've generally avoided XX的 entries where the meaning is obvious from the root term. Even then we have about 800 of them.

偽善	407375	  
偽善者	165499	  
偽善的	32195	  
偽善的な	15469	 

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=hypocritical
〈侮蔑的〉〔言動が〕善人ぶった、偽善（者）的な、猫をかぶった◆【反】sincere

Removing [adj-no] from 偽善. sankoku gives －者・ー的.  In eijiro.

A bit late I guess, but we might have had [adj-no], [adj-na], and [adj-teki]. 

And now I want to know more about eijiro's 猫をかぶった... (we have it).

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/星野展弥