Since "thick" has many meanings, I don't think it works well as the first gloss.

The example sentence was indexed to the other ドロドロ entry. I updated it to point to this one (泥々[1]{どろどろ}~)

@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>thick</gloss>
@@ -31,0 +31 @@
+<gloss>thick</gloss>

Certainly

@@ -7 +6,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>

Can we remove the priority tag from 泥々?

Yes, it should be iK.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -9,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

セーフティバント	9056	55.7%
セーフティーバント	7190	44.3%

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<reb>セーフティバント</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>セーフティ・バント</reb>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bunt_(baseball)#Bunting_for_a_base_hit
https://baseballrulesacademy.com/bunting-for-a-base-hit/
セーフティーバント	7,190
セイフティバント	205

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>セイフティバント</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -11 +8 @@
-<reb>セイフティ・バント</reb>
+<reb>セーフティー・バント</reb>
@@ -14 +11,2 @@
-<reb>セーフティー・バント</reb>
+<reb>セイフティバント</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -18 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2243230">犠牲バント</xref>
@@ -21 +18 @@
-<gloss>bunt performed for a base hit</gloss>
+<gloss>bunt for a base hit</gloss>

@@ -10,0 +10,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>セイフティ・バント</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>セーフティー・バント</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -13,0 +19,1 @@
+<field>&baseb;</field>

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
@@ -18,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&net-sl;</misc>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<field>&comp;</field>
@@ -23 +24 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1968820">マルチ商法・マルチしょうほう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1968820">マルチ商法</xref>
@@ -25 +26 @@
-<gloss>multilevel marketing system</gloss>
+<gloss>multi-level marketing</gloss>

Splitting on source.

@@ -28,8 +27,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1129880">マルチング</xref>
-<field>&gardn;</field>
-<gloss>mulch</gloss>
-<gloss>mulching</gloss>

@@ -33,0 +34 @@
+<field>&gardn;</field>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&gardn;</field>

meikyo: 「一早く」「いち速く」は誤り。

〈逸／一／いち／イチ〉〈早／速／はや〉く

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ いち早く　 │ 2,011,873 │ 93.3% │
│ 逸早く　　 │    16,642 │  0.8% │ - rK (most kokugos, gg5)
│ 逸速く　　 │       329 │  0.0% │ - rK (daijr/s, koj, smk)
│ イチ早く　 │    51,885 │  2.4% │ - add, sK
│ 一早く　　 │    20,877 │  1.0% │ - add, sK (meikyo)
│ いち速く　 │     2,583 │  0.1% │ - add, sK (meikyo)
│ イチ速く　 │     1,260 │  0.1% │
│ 一速く　　 │       343 │  0.0% │
│ 一はやく　 │        71 │  0.0% │
│ 逸はやく　 │         0 │  0.0% │
│ いちはやく │    49,073 │  2.3% │
│ イチはやく │       267 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +14,13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>イチ早く</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>一早く</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>いち速く</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

We tend to add spec1 to things with >1m in the 2008 ngrams. (or that's what Johan used to do, at least)

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

G n-grams:

いち早く	2011873 <- gg5 examples
逸早く	16642
いち速く	2583
逸速く	329
いちはやく	49073

2M n-grams warrants a frequency tag?

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>逸早く</keb>
+<keb>いち早く</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>いち早く</keb>
+<keb>逸早く</keb>

According to sankoku, みどりご is uk. Splitting it out.

@@ -7,7 +6,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>みどり児</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>緑児</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -16,4 +8,0 @@
-<re_restr>嬰児</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>みどりご</reb>

daijr/s and koj have 緑児 for みどりご, but the smaller kokugos don't mention it.
I think it can be [rK] here.

緑児	340

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>緑児</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

嬰児	21061	89.8%
みどり児	2395	10.2%

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>みどり児</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<re_restr>嬰児</re_restr>

OK. The text glosser should work on the two components.

外人向け	        11,334		
外国人向け	125,583

I strongly feel this isn't needed. Although isn't not rare, it's not especially common either. I don't think it matters that it's been an entry for years. It's A+B, the meaning is obvious, and 外国人向け is much more common.

外人向け	11334

It's not rare and it's been in the dictionary for 20+ years. I can't see that removing it is an improvement.

We prob don't need this one w the much more common 外国人向け in. A+B

〈串／くし／クシ〉〈焼（き）／やき／ヤキ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 串焼き　 │ 722,834 │ 72.1% │
│ 串焼　　 │ 264,415 │ 26.4% │
│ 串やき　 │   5,310 │  0.5% │ - add, sK
│ くし焼き │   3,909 │  0.4% │ - add, sK
│ くし焼　 │   2,181 │  0.2% │ - add, sK
│ クシ焼き │      85 │  0.0% │
│ くしやき │   3,082 │  0.3% │
│ クシヤキ │      80 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -9,0 +10,12 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>串やき</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>くし焼き</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>くし焼</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +27 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

daij

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>串焼</keb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 思いがけず　 │ 283,312 │ 98.1% │
│ 思い掛けず　 │   1,654 │  0.6% │ - rK (smk, daijr/s, etc.)
│ おもいがけず │   3,957 │  1.4% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>surprisingly</gloss>

I meant "glosses" of course.

daijr/s

Don't see the need for those last two senses.

@@ -17,2 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>not expecting</gloss>
-<gloss>not dreaming of</gloss>

koj, saito

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>conflict</gloss>
+<gloss>fight</gloss>

gg5 redirects to 闘争. Many refs include 「闘争。」 in their definitions.

sankoku has a 文 tag.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 争闘 │     8,151 │  0.6% │
│ 闘争 │ 1,352,937 │ 99.4% │
╰─ーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1451020">闘争・1</xref>
+<misc>&form;</misc>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog, daij

The second sense is always ironic (but the glosses aren't). I think the note is confusing no matter how we word it.

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>detestable</gloss>
@@ -27,2 +28,2 @@
-<gloss>poor-looking</gloss>
-<gloss>detestable</gloss>
+<gloss>vexing</gloss>
+<gloss>provoking</gloss>
@@ -32 +32,0 @@
-<s_inf>often with irony</s_inf>

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

sankoku

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 憎い　 │ 293,721 │ 91.1% │
│ ニクい │  28,585 │  8.9% │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -17,0 +18,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ニクい</reb>

meikyo:「とにかく」を強めた言い方。「兎にも角にも」と当てる。

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1443990">兎に角・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1443990">とにかく・1</xref>
@@ -13,0 +15,3 @@
+<gloss>at any rate</gloss>
+<gloss>in any case</gloss>
+<gloss>anyway</gloss>
@@ -15,4 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>anyway</gloss>
-<gloss>somehow or other</gloss>
-<gloss>generally speaking</gloss>
-<gloss>in any case</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1443990">兎に角・1</xref>

Dropping [adj-no] from the first sense. 

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────────┬───────╮
│ 病気　　 │ 14,339,579 │ 99.5% │
│ 病氣　　 │      6,036 │  0.0% │ - [oK] to [sK]
│ びょうき │     22,139 │  0.2% │
│ ビョーキ │     44,199 │  0.3% │ - add, sk (sankoku)
╰─ーーーー─┴────────────┴───────╯

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ビョーキ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -22 +25,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

500+ example sentences, and AFAICT all are sense 1.

病気し	55652
病気をし	77890
病気する	9691
病気をする	12935

I don't think the "crazy" meaning should be merged with sense 2. 
According to our current policy, sense 1 shouldn't be vs.

@@ -23,2 +23 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>illness (usu. excluding minor ailments, e.g. colds)</gloss>
+<gloss>illness (usu. excluding minor ailments, e.g. common cold)</gloss>
@@ -30,2 +28,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>weirdness</gloss>
@@ -34,2 +31,10 @@
-<gloss>craziness</gloss>
-<gloss>perversion</gloss>
+<gloss>weakness</gloss>
+<gloss>failing</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>crazy</gloss>
+<gloss>insane</gloss>
+<gloss>disturbed</gloss>
+<gloss>sick in the head</gloss>

病氣	6036

Probably common enough to mention.

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>病氣</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

Trying to remove an xref.

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="2842935">仰向き</xref>

GG5, etc. Kokugos

I'm doubtful about うつ向き but probably OK as sK. Drop that xref.
I'll align 俯け - GG5 and other JEs have them identical

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2859127">俯き加減</xref>

俯向き	313	13.8%
うつ向き	1961	86.2%

Ah yes, and the original thing.  俯向き was rare, but not "うつ向き".  Google search (quoted) returns plenty of exactly what you expect (sense[1]). Happy to leave [sK] though, I think it's "wrong".

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>うつ向き</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

俯き	92010	  
俯き加減	62411	 

うつむき加減の	6122	95.3%
うつむきの	300	4.7%

うつむき加減のなりたちってなんですか？
まあ、「加減」≒程度(湯加減)→“そのものずばりではないが、それに近い状態”とでも言っておきましょうか。
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q13119914018

うつむき and うつむき加減 images are not actually distinguishable. The latter seems far more common.

kokugos call this and 仰向き antonyms, but this seems way less common.  Image searches matching [2] are non-existing.  Image searches for 仰向き are all laying face up in bed. 仕方がない I guess.

yourei examples even use 少し俯き加減, which should otherwise be redundant.
少し俯き	1937
少し俯き加減	863 <--- 1937 includes these as well
少し俯きながら	373 <--- and these, which are verbal uses of 少し俯く

@@ -9,0 +10,10 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2859127">俯き加減</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2859127">俯き加減</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2859127">俯き加減</xref>
+<xref type="ant" seq="2842935">仰向き</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>facing downward</gloss>
+</sense>

- sankoku has 端たない as a headword (wrapped in its '仮名書き可' parentheses)
- shinmeikai has this word as a subentry in its entry for はした【端た】
- obunsha has 端ない as a headword
- iwakoku states directly that this is 「端」の形容詞化。

None of these refs say it is ateji or a special reading / jukujikun.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 端ない　　 │     95 │  0.2% │ - [iK] to [sK]
│ 端たない　 │    120 │  0.3% │ - [iK] to [rK]
│ はしたない │ 38,450 │ 99.4% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,2 +5,3 @@
-<keb>端ない</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>端たない</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -9,3 +10,2 @@
-<keb>端たない</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<keb>端ない</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<s_inf>poss. ateji</s_inf>

Since the 国語s are quiet on it being an ateji, I think I'll put it in a note, and close it.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<s_inf>poss. ateji</s_inf>

Sorry, I meant [iK], not [oK]. Definitely irregular, not obsolete.
I can find quite a few recent examples of "端ない" on Twitter.

@@ -6 +6 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -10 +10 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

is there any evidence that this is "obsolete"?  (i.e., is there any evidence it used to be a thing in the past but is no longer?  the uses i'm seeing online don't seem to come from old sources)  i think ateji makes more sense
--
also, 端たない seems to be more common than 端ない, since 端ない looks to get a lot more false positives.
--
overall i get <200 "real" google hits for both headwords combined (many/most of which don't seem to be real), which raises the question of whether it's worth recording at all, or if it's just a henkan error and should be iK

meikyo: 多く「お━」の形で
あつらえ向き	12,553		
おあつらえ向き	11,762

Aliging.

@@ -16,2 +16,3 @@
-<misc>&id;</misc>
-<gloss>perfect</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. お〜</s_inf>
+<gloss>perfect (for)</gloss>
+<gloss>ideal</gloss>
@@ -19 +20 @@
-<gloss>ideal</gloss>
+<gloss>most suitable</gloss>

aligning, all comments at xref.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +15,5 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2535570">おあつらえ向き</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2535570">おあつらえ向き</xref>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>perfect</gloss>
+<gloss>just right</gloss>
@@ -17 +21 @@
-<gloss>most suitable</gloss>
+<gloss>tailor-made</gloss>

GG5, ルミナス, Unidic/ngrams

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>あつらえ向き</keb>
+</k_ele>

Needs to be split (2/3 rule). I suggested a まをとる entry in 2013.

@@ -11,3 +10,0 @@
-<reb>まをとる</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -17,7 +13,0 @@
-<stagr>まをとる</stagr>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
-<gloss>to pause</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>あいだをとる</stagr>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/間をとる

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 間を取る │ 10,635 │ 81.9% │
│ 間をとる │  2,351 │ 18.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -6,0 +7,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>間をとる</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>まをとる</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10,0 +17,7 @@
+<stagr>まをとる</stagr>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<gloss>to pause</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>あいだをとる</stagr>

GG5

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>to split the difference</gloss>

possibly.  but i agree this should remain with this reading.

Harmless, but also not much use.

A+B.

I don't think the gloss needs explaining. Xrefs not very relevant. Actually it's a marginal entry.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12,5 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1520980">北向き</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1460290">南向き</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1447800">東向き</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1380960">西向き</xref>
-<gloss>orientation of a house (i.e. the direction its windows face)</gloss>
+<gloss>orientation of a house</gloss>

家相	172371	96.1%
家の向き	1621	0.9%
家向き	5282	2.9%


北向き	67598	8.7%
南向き	581617	75.3%
西向き	57593	7.5%
東向き	65927	8.5%

家の日当たりのベストな方角は？向き別の特徴や日当たり対策方法も
https://www.cosmokensetsu.co.jp/hint/house-sunny-direction/



https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/家の向き
そこの流れとは、家の向きの方向に応じて2つのオプションがあります。
There are two options depending on the direction of flow and orientation of the house.

https://www.yourhome.gov.au/passive-design/orientation#:~:text=Orientation is how a building,be protected from their effects.
Orientation is how a building is positioned in relation to the sun’s paths in different seasons, as well as to prevailing wind patterns. In passive design, it is also about how living and sleeping areas are designed and positioned, either to take advantage of the sun and wind, or be protected from their effects.

https://www.bobvila.com/articles/why-it-matters-which-direction-your-home-faces/
“Location, location, location!” may be a well-known real estate rallying cry, but the orientation of a house is important as well. House orientation refers to the position of a structure on its site, and it’s typically described by the cardinal direction that the front facade faces—for example, a home with its main entrance facing north would be described as a north-facing house.

This use of "aspect" was perhaps not wrong, but quite ambiguous on its own.  It's also not a word I would have thought to use for this, though it clearly is used.  However all the immediate hits I get are from australia and the uk (could be because I'm searching from Japan).

I don't get the feeling from web results that this is so much of a "word" as it is the question of *which* cardinal 向き your house is going to be. So this is just A+B, and not super common.

向き[1] is direction; orientation; aspect; exposure

So there's really not much point...  Was going to vote "delete", but I guess it's a kind-of cute entry with all the xrefs tying together a nice concept in Japanese.  But you may wish to delete it anyway.

I believe a house can have multiple 向き's. (ie. A south facing and north facing side, with the walls blocked by other buildings, or something to that effect)...

@@ -12 +12,6 @@
-<gloss>aspect of a house</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1520980">北向き</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1460290">南向き</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1447800">東向き</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1380960">西向き</xref>
+<gloss>orientation of a house (i.e. the direction its windows face)</gloss>
+<gloss>house's aspect</gloss>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ どかっと │ 28,454 │ 42.8% │
│ ドカッと │ 26,585 │ 40.0% │
│ ドカっと │  7,917 │ 11.9% │
│ ドカと　 │  2,553 │  3.8% │
│ どかと　 │    925 │  1.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,9 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ドカッと</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ドカっと</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ドカと</reb>

GG5

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>for the general market</gloss>

一般向け	550612	  
一般向け情報	172900	  
一般向けの	66750	  
一般向けに	66308	  
一般向け漫画	34511	 
...

Looking at むき・むけ, these are usually [adj-no] and usually not [exp] currently.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Entry created

sankoku (entry for そつ):
  俗に「：卒」 「ソツ」とも。

〈卒／そつ／ソツ〉〈が／の〉〈無／な〉い

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ そつが無い │  1,012 │  7.5% │
│ ソツが無い │    800 │  5.9% │ - add, sK
│ 卒がない　 │    656 │  4.8% │ - add, iK
│ 卒が無い　 │    271 │  2.0% │ - add, sK
│ そつがない │  7,077 │ 52.2% │
│ ソツがない │  3,747 │ 27.6% │
├─ーーーーー─┼────────┼───────┤
│ そつの無い │  1,720 │  7.5% │
│ ソツの無い │  1,106 │  4.8% │
│ 卒のない　 │  1,212 │  5.3% │
│ 卒の無い　 │    378 │  1.6% │
│ そつのない │ 10,950 │ 47.5% │
│ ソツのない │  7,698 │ 33.4% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

I think it's okay to have 卒 as an irregular form here. 卒 forms get >7% of the counts.
Compare to our entry for 卒なく.

@@ -4,0 +5,4 @@
+<keb>卒がない</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +10,8 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ソツが無い</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>卒が無い</keb>
@@ -12,0 +25 @@
+<re_nokanji/>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12 +12,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>

Aligning.

@@ -21,0 +22,4 @@
+<gloss>tactful</gloss>
+<gloss>prudent</gloss>
+<gloss>faultless</gloss>
+<gloss>perfect</gloss>

http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q148708644
G n-grams:
卒がない	656
そつが無い	1012
卒が無い	271
そつがない	7077
ソツがない	3747

The 卒 is interesting. It was added in a 2006 edit, with the ref: "江戸語の辞典（講談社学術文庫）" The chiebukuro discussion is very appropriate. I think it's best omitted.

I'm always keen to keep the text-glossing functions running appropriately. In this case there'd probably be a partial match with 外国人向け which would work OK.

A+B and far less common than 外国人向け. I can't see a case for keeping this.

I'd keep it.

Reasons given previously, but posted changes just in case as well.

外人向け	11334	8.1%
外人向き	246	0.2%
外国人向け	125583	90.0%
外国人向き	2350	1.7%

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/mojimojimojisuke/e/d7e6157cfca451b66f2e905724217f10
Aimed at/designed for Japanese people:
この辞書は日本人向けです。みなさんにはちょっと難しいと思います。
suitable for foreigners:
　文が易しいです。例文がたくさんあります。この辞書は外国人向きです。

Was going to [adj-no] this, but on further thought, this is pedestrian and A+B and not particularly common vs. other forms we don't have. (We have 外人向け, oddly, but not 外国人向け)..

The gloss is also maybe wrong.  向き vs 向け is subtle indeed, but we actually record the distinction:
向き suited to; suitable for; designed for
向け 1. intended for ...; oriented towards ...; aimed at ...

So "muki" is potentially aimed at many audiences, but not explicitly for foreigners.  I guess. 8 years of Japanese and I don't really know.

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>aimed at foreigners</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>suitable for foreigners</gloss>

特定マシン向け	0
マシン向け	1255
特定マシン	304

A+B+C. Not needed.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

Entry created

Quiet. Closing.

I'll set it to [arch] as per my last comment, approve (to shorten the queue) and reopen for a while.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

I think it should be [arch]. There are other terms such as 睡眠不足 (current entry) and 睡眠遮断 which are in the references and which are used for the medical condition. 現責 seems only to be used to refer to the Edo period punishment. I don't think it meets the "term itself is still in current use" criterion for [hist].

https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy
> "arch" (archaism). This is typically used to indicate that the term was primarily used during or before the Edo period.

> The "hist" (historical) term does not fall into this category. It refers to a past event (e.g. battle, ceremony) or concept (e.g. an art-form common in the 18th century), but the term itself is still in current use.

I'm inclined to agree that [hist] makes more sense than [arch] for specific concepts that have not been replaced by modern exact equivalents. But it seems this is contrary to the current editorial policy.

The argument on 2858694 by Jim was that the term must still be in current use for it to be [hist]. I don't know if hypothetical papers written about the subject would make the term qualify as being still in use.

gg5, prog

I don't think id is appropriate here.
The kokugos don't describe it as polite.

@@ -19,3 +19,2 @@
-<misc>&id;</misc>
-<misc>&pol;</misc>
-<gloss>perfect</gloss>
+<gloss>perfect (for)</gloss>
+<gloss>ideal</gloss>
@@ -23 +22 @@
-<gloss>ideal</gloss>
+<gloss>most suitable</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/ejword/tailored tailor-made
(形)目的[要求、条件、好み]にぴったり合った 〜に適合した 〜に適した あつらえ向きの 注文仕立ての 仮編成済みの

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=あつらえ向き
おあつらえ向きの
形
tailored

の：
おあつらえ向きの場所	198	33.2%
お誂え向きの場所	59	9.9%
御誂え向きの場所	0	0.0%
あつらえ向きの場所	208	34.8%
誂え向きの場所	66	11.1%

な：
おあつらえ向きな場所	32	5.4%
お誂え向きな場所	0	0.0%
御誂え向きな場所	0	0.0%
あつらえ向きな場所	34	5.7%
誂え向きな場所	0	0.0%

To be clear, this looked to me like it *should* be the equivalent to the English idiom "tailor-made", so I went off hunting for that and found someone to agree with me.  誂える is "to have made to order", this feels like an almost-identical derivation in English and Japanese.
 
Wouldn't have edited this all, except for this and the back-ref are the first two terms that come back when searching "ends-with-向き", and they were obviously the same, but not aligned.

I've reversed the xrefs (and not even cross-ref'd).  daijs makes the rare statement: 多く「おあつらえむき」の形で
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/誂え向き/

eijiro only gives おあつらえ向き forms, and if you google あつらえ向き you'll be hard pressed to find it without お.  Book results reveal some unadorned 誂え向き.

I just attempted to remove [pol] from onigiri, so it feels inconsistent to put it here if this is the only form used in practice. But perhaps the whole expression is polite and that's the reason it's here, in which case it's fine. 

Usage with な seems very limited, with very few collocations except 場所.  xref/backref has adj-na there, but I think the entry is better without.

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1808590">誂え向き</xref>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<misc>&pol;</misc>
@@ -22,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>tailor-made</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

daijr/s, koj, and nikk have a second sense meaning something like "place of origin." gg5 and sankoku don't mention it.

[vi]: sankoku

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 来所　　 │ 78,411 │ 99.2% │
│ 来処　　 │    593 │  0.8% │ - add, rK (koj, nikk)
│ らいしょ │  3,427 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>来処</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -13,1 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>to come to or visit an office (or any place that ends with the kanji 所)</gloss>
+<s_inf>appropriate for any place ending with 〜所</s_inf>
+<gloss>coming to an office, laboratory, etc.</gloss>

http://www.weblio.jp/content/来所

Actually, no case was made for that edit. Please include them in future, including the reason for removing words.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>coming to a police station, fire station, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>coming to a police station, fire station, tax office, etc.</gloss>

The case made was the word 税務署. You will find plenty of use of this word on NTA.go.jp

sankoku: 警察署・税務署など、署と呼ばれるところへ来ること。

Copying the note from the x-ref entry

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<s_inf>appropriate for any place ending with 〜署</s_inf>

No case made. Reverting.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>coming to a police station, tax office, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>coming to a police station, fire station, etc.</gloss>

税務署

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -14 +15 @@
-<gloss>coming to a police station, fire station, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>coming to a police station, tax office, etc.</gloss>

Actually it is the kana form. Yes, a note is clearer.

I think using the irregularity tags like this is confusing.
It's the entire word that is irregular, not just the kanji form.

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<s_inf>non-standard variant of 濡れそぼつ</s_inf>

ぬれそぼつ	67
濡れそぼつ	1261
濡れそぼる	1181
ぬれそぼる	149
濡れそぼり	875
濡れそぼち	474

But just as common. Curious.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&ik;</ke_inf>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>(considered incorrect) to be dripping wet</gloss>
+<gloss>to be dripping wet</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/濡れそぼる

We have another entry for うまい話 that displays all the kanji forms.

〈うま／甘／旨／上手〉い〈話／はなし／ハナシ〉には〈裏／うら／ウラ〉が

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ うまい話には裏が　　　 │ 5,195 │ 78.1% │
│ 上手い話には裏が　　　 │   430 │  6.5% │ - [iK] to [sK]
│ 甘い話には裏が　　　　 │   371 │  5.6% │ - sK
│ 旨い話には裏が　　　　 │   283 │  4.3% │ - sK
│ うまい話にはウラが　　 │   280 │  4.2% │
│ 甘い話にはウラが　　　 │    26 │  0.4% │
│ 上手い話にはウラが　　 │    26 │  0.4% │
│ 旨い話にはウラが　　　 │    22 │  0.3% │
│ うまい話にはうらが　　 │    21 │  0.3% │
│ うまいはなしにはうらが │     0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15 +17 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

It seems there was an extraneous うら in one of the kanji components.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<keb>上手い話には裏うらがある</keb>
+<keb>上手い話には裏がある</keb>

Add POS to proverbs
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&v5r-i;</pos>

I think this is clearer.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────╮
│ 危なかしい　　 │    983 │
│ あぶなかしい　 │    460 │
├─ーーーーーーー─┼────────┤
│ 危なっかしい　 │ 96,577 │
│ あぶなっかしい │ 11,817 │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────╯

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,0 +13 @@
+<s_inf>non-standard variant of 危なっかしい</s_inf>

See 1218400

OK with me.

〈梨／なし／ナシ〉〈狩（り）／がり／ガリ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 梨狩り　 │ 26,639 │ 75.7% │
│ なし狩り │  4,903 │ 13.9% │
│ ナシ狩り │  1,711 │  4.9% │
│ ナシ狩　 │    878 │  2.5% │
│ 梨狩　　 │    501 │  1.4% │
│ 梨がり　 │    212 │  0.6% │
│ なし狩　 │    187 │  0.5% │
│ なしがり │    151 │  0.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

The -狩り suffix for "picking fruit" was new to me, so I went through the trouble of drafting this entry.
I now see we have it as sense [2] in in the entry for 狩り, though.
Maybe it's fine to add anyway.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────╮
│ 群衆なだれ │ 116 │
│ 群集なだれ │  85 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>群衆なだれ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>群集なだれ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

OK

This was rejected 3 years ago (as 群衆雪崩) due to not being in any refs, but now it's in the latest versions of daijisen and gg5.

I think the accepted name for this phenomenon is just "crowd collapse." When someone falls in a very dense crowd, the pressure of the crowd causes more people to fall into the void created by people falling, and so on.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowd_collapses_and_crushes#Crowd_collapses

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬────╮
│ 群衆雪崩　　　　 │ 90 │
│ 群集雪崩　　　　 │ 43 │
│ ぐんしゅうなだれ │  0 │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴────╯

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>群衆雪崩</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12 +15 @@
-<gloss>falling down one after another</gloss>
+<gloss>crowd collapse</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/群衆雪崩-2879248

群集雪崩とも書く

Comments in entries 1464670, 1287960

It seems we don't use the [food] tag with beverages

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<field>&food;</field>

wiki

碧螺春	12018

I agree.

I don't think so. It's virtually unused in Japanese. 庯 is not in any JIS standard.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ベトナムの地方行政区画

Cf. 市社、市鎮

限りです	1307451
限りだ	144031

This is really a sense of 限り/かぎり and is best covered in that entry. It's in GG5 and I've proposed an extra entry based on it.

https://www.janguage.jp/material/grammar/grammar-advanced-9
https://www.mlcjapanese.co.jp/n1_04_12.html

Google N-gram Corpus Counts (probably very inflated by 限り being used in other contexts, still useful imo)
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 限りです　 │ 1,307,451 │ 90.1% │
│ かぎりです │   144,143 │  9.9% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

俯き加減	62411	  
俯き加減の	1935	  
俯き加減が	189

I don't think we can class this as adj-no.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

うつむき加減	38500	  
うつむき加減に	12550	  
うつむき加減で	12097	  
うつむき加減の	6122

Cribbed note from a similar term.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<s_inf>oft. as ～で or 〜に</s_inf>

俯き加減	62411
うつむき加減	38500
うつむきかげん	7257

missed a form

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>うつむき加減</keb>

115 examples, all appear to be ~の、～に、and ～で. One exceptional use of な様子 not supported by the ngrams.
https://yourei.jp/俯き加減
Example: その横には、少し俯き加減の玉木が立っている。
Example: 俯き加減の少女の唇から漏れるため息が、白い吐息となって凍えた空気に霧散した。

https://www.weblio.jp/content/俯き加減
顔を少し下へ向けているさま。

nikk: 少しうつむいている様子。うつむきぎみ。

俯き加減	62411	100.0%
俯加減	0	0.0%

俯き加減に	55212	   <-- I think the database has inflated this
俯き加減で	3614	  
俯き加減の	1935	  
俯き加減な	356	  (なので。。。)



俯き加減 とはどういう意味ですか?
https://ja.hinative.com/questions/21808765
少しうつむいている様子
うつむく=顔が下を向く😞

Image search.  Images seem to not *necessarily* imply sadness. 

nikk uses 俯加減, but this isn't used anywhere(maybe 3 non-reference book results?). I would really rather not surface this.

Would be nice to indicate に and で. These both seem more common than の。

Styled after 大人向け.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>for foreigners</gloss>
+<gloss>(intended) for foreigners</gloss>
+<gloss>aimed at foreigners</gloss>

I don't think the xref is needed.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1277090">向け</xref>

外国人向け	125583	91.7%
外人向け	11334	8.3%

新宿区外国人向け生活情報ホームページ
https://www.city.shinjuku.lg.jp/tabunka/tabunka01_002117.html

Adding because 外人向け is in here. It's A+B, but also super common, so... add this, or delete the other one?

"for foreigners" is super common as a gloss.  I want to say "aimed at", "designed for", but in practice these are situational and not so common. xref offers them as a suggestion, and explains the term.

It's funny, Japanese teachers are always berating us foreigners for saying gaijin, but we use it to describe ourselves all the time (at least, the otherwise well-treated Americans certainly do).

Split from 1129880.

Yes, it's hard to make a strong case for it.

I still don't think it's particularly helpful. It's A+B and relatively uncommon.

Reverso (a lot of matches)

Maybe the unique part can be kept in this form. I'll change the sequence number to drop the clip.

@@ -3 +2,0 @@
-<ent_seq>2352060</ent_seq>
@@ -5 +4 @@
-<keb>係数設定モード</keb>
+<keb>係数設定</keb>
@@ -8 +7 @@
-<reb>けいすうせっていモード</reb>
+<reb>けいすうせってい</reb>
@@ -10,0 +10 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&electr;</field>
@@ -13,2 +14 @@
-<gloss>potentiometer set mode</gloss>
-<gloss>programmable modulus mode</gloss>
+<gloss>coefficient setting</gloss>

I don't think it's needed. It's rare, compositional and extremely technical.

It's in the electrical engineering EPWING dictionary I have too.
係数設定	527

If we had a good gloss for 係数設定 it could be trimmed back.
Not computing really.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>programmable modulus mode</gloss>

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>安東</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>Andong</gloss>
+<gloss>Andong (South Korea)</gloss>

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>原州</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>Wonju</gloss>
+<gloss>Wonju (South Korea)</gloss>

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>烏山</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>Osan</gloss>
+<gloss>Osan (South Korea)</gloss>

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>芹苴</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>Can-tho (Vietnam)</gloss>
+<gloss>Can Tho (Vietnam)</gloss>

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>江陵</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>Gangrung</gloss>
+<gloss>Gangneung (South Korea)</gloss>

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>金泉</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>Kimchon</gloss>
+<gloss>Gimcheon (South Korea)</gloss>

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>群山</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>Kunsan</gloss>
+<gloss>Gunsan (South Korea)</gloss>

GG5

Merging

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>こうしゅう</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -12,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>Kongju</gloss>

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>公州</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>Kongju (Korea)</gloss>
+<gloss>Gongju (South Korea)</gloss>

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>束草</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>Sokch'o</gloss>
+<gloss>Sokcho (South Korea)</gloss>

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>城南</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -6,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>じょうなん</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +15 @@
-<gloss>Songnam</gloss>
+<gloss>Seongnam (South Korea)</gloss>

* nipp: https://kotobank.jp/word/堤川-1565287#w-1565287
* britt: https://kotobank.jp/word/チェチョン(堤川)市-95684

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ていせん</reb>

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>堤川</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>Chechon</gloss>
+<gloss>Jecheon (South Korea)</gloss>

GG5 ("Ch'ungju")
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chungju

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>忠州</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>Chungju</gloss>
+<gloss>Chungju (South Korea)</gloss>

GG5 ("Ch'ŏnan")
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheonan

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>天安</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>Cheonan</gloss>
+<gloss>Cheonan (South Korea)</gloss>

GG5 ("Chinju; Jinju")
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jinju

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>晋州</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>Chinju</gloss>
+<gloss>Jinju (South Korea)</gloss>

britt: https://kotobank.jp/word/トンドゥチョン(東豆川)市-107151

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>東豆川</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>Tongduchon</gloss>
+<gloss>Dongducheon (South Korea)</gloss>

mypedia; heibonsha

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>東海</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -6,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>とうかい</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +15 @@
-<gloss>Donghae</gloss>
+<gloss>Donghae (South Korea)</gloss>

mypedia; nipp; heibonsha; britt

None of the above have the 「ナモン」 transliteration, but seems to be used: http://seoulexpert.blog85.fc2.com/blog-entry-663.html

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>南原</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -6,0 +10,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ナモン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>なんげん</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +18 @@
-<gloss>Namwon (Korea)</gloss>
+<gloss>Namwon (South Korea)</gloss>

Dupe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ho_Chi_Minh_City
Ho Chi Minh City (abbreviated HCMC),[a] also known as Saigon

"Saigon" is still used (unofficially).

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam, formerly Saigon)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam)</gloss>
+<gloss>Saigon</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Ho Chi Minh City (Saigon)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam, formerly Saigon)</gloss>

I can only see one entry.

Dupe

gg5 and daijirin.
Daijirin also has an entry for ほこう【浦項】 which redirects to ポハン【浦項】.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pohang

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ほこう</reb>

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>浦項</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>P'ohang</gloss>
+<gloss>Pohang (South Korea)</gloss>

* britt: https://kotobank.jp/word/ヨジュ(驪州)邑-146235
* nipp & heibonsha: https://kotobank.jp/word/驪州-1216855

britt has Yǒju and heibonsha has (R)Yŏju. I'm guessing a different romanization scheme.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>れいしゅう</reb>

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>驪州</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>Yoju</gloss>
+<gloss>Yeoju (South Korea)</gloss>

GG5 ("Yŏsu; Yeosu")
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yeosu

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>麗水</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>Yosu</gloss>
+<gloss>Yeosu (South Korea)</gloss>

GG5 ("Yongju")
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yeongju

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>栄州</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9 +12 @@
-<gloss>Yongju</gloss>
+<gloss>Yeongju (South Korea)</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
-<gloss>Inbisen</gloss>
+<misc>&place;</misc>
+<gloss>Inbi Line</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
-<gloss>Inbisen</gloss>
+<misc>&place;</misc>
+<gloss>Inbi Line (East Okayama Railway)</gloss>

遠州鉄道鉄道線	713	38.9%
遠州鉄道線	1120	61.1%

Odd English version

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>

wiki

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>河內</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<reb>はのい</reb>
+<reb>ハノイ</reb>
@@ -12 +15 @@
-<gloss>Hanoi</gloss>
+<gloss>Hanoi (Vietnam)</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

And this is how I ran into all the train lines.  Line up the Eastern side of Chiba.

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
-<gloss>Sotobousen</gloss>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>
+<gloss>Sotobō Line</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
-<gloss>Kiseihonsen</gloss>
+<misc>&place;</misc>
+<gloss>Kisei Main Line (Wakayama-Mie railway)</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
-<gloss>Geibisen</gloss>
+<misc>&place;</misc>
+<gloss>Geibi Line (Hiroshima-North Okayama railway)</gloss>

I think that's a reasonable approach.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Daijirin has a ホーチミン entry.

https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/94#issuecomment-1528704454
>> Once the initial 4k or so were in I was planning to look at the other groups. Place names such as アントワープ and オークランド, which have fairly high n-gram counts, are obvious candidates.

Names recorded in the kokugos seem like good candidates as well.

I thought he was worth a mention.

Currently people or places from the names dictionary aren't included in the jmdict release.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -13,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Ho Chi Minh</gloss>
-<gloss>Nguyen Tat Thanh (1890-1969)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ho Chi Minh (1890-1969)</gloss>
+<gloss>Nguyen Tat Thanh</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -9,0 +11,5 @@
+<sense>
+<misc>&person;</misc>
+<gloss>Ho Chi Minh</gloss>
+<gloss>Nguyen Tat Thanh (1890-1969)</gloss>
+</sense>

Fork

Due to a mistake with with ヶ/ケ, this is a duplicate of 向ヶ丘遊園モノレール線
jmnedict 5269912 Active (id: 2266999)

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>

Yuu/yuu fixup
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Mukōgaokayuuen Monorail Line</gloss>
+<gloss>Mukōgaokayūen Monorail Line</gloss>

向 Mukou to Mukō conversion
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Mukougaokayuuen Monorail Line</gloss>
+<gloss>Mukōgaokayuuen Monorail Line</gloss>

Merged.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーーーー─┬─────╮
│ 向ケ丘遊園モノレール線 │   0 │ - (this entry)
│ 向ヶ丘遊園モノレール線 │ 258 │ - (entry 5269912)
╰─ーーーーーーーーーーー─┴─────╯

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>

Yuu/yuu fixup
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Mukōgaokayuuen Monorail Line</gloss>
+<gloss>Mukōgaokayūen Monorail Line</gloss>

向 Mukou to Mukō conversion
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Mukougaokayuuen Monorail Line</gloss>
+<gloss>Mukōgaokayuuen Monorail Line</gloss>

向ケ丘遊園	3436	5.7%
向ヶ丘遊園	56391	94.3%

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>向ケ丘遊園モノレール線</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>

Yuu/yuu fixup
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Mukōgaokayuuen Monorail Line</gloss>
+<gloss>Mukōgaokayūen Monorail Line</gloss>

向 Mukou to Mukō conversion
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Mukougaokayuuen Monorail Line</gloss>
+<gloss>Mukōgaokayuuen Monorail Line</gloss>

No xrefs for names

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -11 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="5548076">都電荒川線・とでんあらかわせん</xref>

@@ -11,2 +11,3 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
-<gloss>Arakawasen</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="5548076">都電荒川線・とでんあらかわせん</xref>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>
+<gloss>Toden Arakawa Line</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>

kyou fixup
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Saikyou Line (railway line running from Tokyo to Saitama)</gloss>
+<gloss>Saikyō Line (railway line running from Tokyo to Saitama)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Saikyousen (railway line running from Tokyo to Saitama)</gloss>
+<gloss>Saikyou Line (railway line running from Tokyo to Saitama)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<misc>&organization;</misc>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

We need a tag for public transportation lines

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>
-<gloss>Sakuradoorisen</gloss>
+<misc>&organization;</misc>
+<gloss>Sakura-dōri Line</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<gloss>Kobe Electric Railway Sanda Line</gloss>
+<gloss>Sanda Line (Kobe Electric Railway)</gloss>
@@ -16 +17 @@
-<gloss>Hankyu Bus Sanda Line</gloss>
+<gloss>Sanda Line (Hankyu Bus)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/三田線
神戸電鉄三田線 - 神戸電鉄の鉄道路線。
三田線 - 阪急バス（旧神鉄バス）のバス路線。阪急バス山口営業所#三田線を参照。

https://www.hankyubus.co.jp/

Not sure the correct disambiguation verbiage, but there are 2 entries based on two readings (みた and さんだ) and they each have two senses.

@@ -11,2 +11,6 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
-<gloss>Sandasen</gloss>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>
+<gloss>Kobe Electric Railway Sanda Line</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>
+<gloss>Hankyu Bus Sanda Line</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<gloss>Toei Mita Line</gloss>
+<gloss>Tōei Mita Line</gloss>
@@ -16 +17 @@
-<gloss>Toden Mita Line (closed 1968)</gloss>
+<gloss>Tōden Mita Line (closed 1968)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/三田線
東京都内（みたせん）
都営地下鉄三田線 - 東京都交通局（都営地下鉄）の鉄道路線。
都電三田線 - 東京都電車の鉄道路線（廃線）。

https://rail-history.org/r/15310.html
三田線（2・5・35・37系統）
三田 - 芝園橋 - 御成門 - 西新橋一丁目 - 日比谷公園
1904年6月21日：開業
1967年12月10日：三田 - 西新橋一丁目間廃止
1968年2月25日：廃止

Defunct lines may still have historical relevance in literature (guessing this is not controversial...)

@@ -11,2 +11,6 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>
-<gloss>Mita Line</gloss>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>
+<gloss>Toei Mita Line</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>
+<gloss>Toden Mita Line (closed 1968)</gloss>

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
-<gloss>Mitasen</gloss>
+<misc>&place;</misc>
+<gloss>Mita Line</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<misc>&place;</misc>
+<misc>&serv;</misc>

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
-<gloss>Shin'etsuhonsen</gloss>
+<misc>&place;</misc>
+<gloss>Shin'etsu Main Line (Gunma-Nagano-Niigata Railway)</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>