smk describes えよう as a "古語的表現".

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

daijs (synOnym in えいよう entry. Natsume Soseki example in えよう entry)

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>えよう</reb>

栄養	7872415	100.0%
営養	2964	0.0%

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

栄養の	414328	  
栄養のバランス	94413	  
栄養のある	88569	  
栄養の宝庫	12482	  
栄養の偏り	12209

Not "nourishing" or "nutritional" (栄養のあるも).

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Meikyo and smk relegate 快復 to a note. Maybe we should do the same.
I don't think "replevin" is needed.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>快復</keb>
+<keb>恢復</keb>
@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<keb>恢復</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>快復</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -25,2 +24,0 @@
-<stagk>回復</stagk>
-<stagk>恢復</stagk>
@@ -31,0 +30 @@
+<gloss>recovery</gloss>
@@ -33 +31,0 @@
-<gloss>recovery</gloss>
@@ -35 +32,0 @@
-<gloss>replevin</gloss>
@@ -41,0 +39 @@
+<s_inf>also written as 快復</s_inf>

mk
回復	10227062	98.9%
快復	92311	0.9%
恢復	22704	0.2%

病気から回復	2406	95.6%
病気から快復	112	4.4%

退院して回復	133	100.0%
退院して快復	0	0.0%

手術から回復	486	90.3%
手術から快復	52	9.7%

"esp. 快復" isn't really correct.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -26,0 +29,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -37 +41 @@
-<s_inf>esp. 快復</s_inf>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Thanks. I guess it could be split, but It's probably best as it is for now.

gg5, prog, nc
the only dic i can find that combines these is meikyo

the alternative to splitting senses is a note saying that 快復 only refers to health and is the preferred form for health

@@ -23,0 +23,2 @@
+<stagk>回復</stagk>
+<stagk>恢復</stagk>
@@ -25,1 +27,5 @@
-<gloss>recovery (from illness)</gloss>
+<gloss>restoration</gloss>
+<gloss>rehabilitation</gloss>
+<gloss>recovery</gloss>
+<gloss>return</gloss>
+<gloss>replevin</gloss>
@@ -27,2 +33,7 @@
-<gloss>rehabilitation</gloss>
-<gloss>restoration</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<s_inf>esp. 快復</s_inf>
+<gloss>recovery (from an illness)</gloss>
+<gloss>recuperation</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<s_inf>after a number N</s_inf>
-<gloss>the Nth time</gloss>
+<s_inf>after a number n</s_inf>
+<gloss>nth time</gloss>

harmonizing with 度目, but whatever gloss you like.

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<s_inf>following a number</s_inf>
-<gloss>-nth time</gloss>
+<s_inf>after a number N</s_inf>
+<gloss>the Nth time</gloss>

I don't think "around" adds anything.

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>-nth time (around)</gloss>
+<s_inf>following a number</s_inf>
+<gloss>-nth time</gloss>

daij

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1217010">含有量</xref>

喜色満面 only accounts for ~65% of usage. I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1218860">喜色満面</xref>

喜色	11547	  
喜色満面	7494	  
喜色を	1629

Aligning with back-ref.  Other glosses could also work, but removing "countenance". More often than not 喜色満面.  All reverso matches are 喜色満面.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>glad countenance</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1218860">喜色満面</xref>
+<gloss>cheerful expression</gloss>
+<gloss>pleased look</gloss>

I don't think so. It's not terminology of the game itself. (GG5 tags it.)

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<field>&baseb;</field>

Does it need a tag?

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&baseb;</field>

gg5

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>ballpark</gloss>

OK

According to the kokugos, only きょう has the "state minister" sense. I think けい should be split out.

@@ -14,3 +13,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>けい</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -18 +14,0 @@
-<stagr>きょう</stagr>
@@ -20,0 +17 @@
+<s_inf>after a name</s_inf>
@@ -29,7 +25,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>けい</stagr>
-<pos>&pn;</pos>
-<misc>&hon;</misc>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>you (in reference to someone of lower status, esp. by a lord to a subject)</gloss>

"Not claiming that anime dictates "correct" usage ...". I should hope not.
Yes, I'd stick with [arch] for sense 3. I think "life-in-another-knights-and-dragons-fantasy world" counts as "during or before the Edo period".

Well, after hopping over to なんじ/thee/thou, I guess this is [arch], and sankoku probably says 文 because literature and fiction is the only place it appears.

It still seems that most [arch] terms here are [rare]/unlikely-to-be-recognized, so it would be nice if there were some distinction.  But I guess if you read the kind of books where this appears, you'll figure it out.  I still think a split might be appropriate.

@@ -34,2 +34 @@
-<misc>&form;</misc>
-<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

This has its own entry in sankoku, so perhaps not quite [arch]:
[文]君父が臣下を呼ぶことば。なんじ。おんみ。「ーら＝諸君」は…].

some けい examples(I have no idea of the age or context):
https://furigana.info/w/卿:けい

a few lines from the anime where I encountered this, if curious:
卿(けい)に見せるのは初めてだったな

卿とナツキ･スバルの関係は ― 卿は聞き及んでいるのか？ どうして卿(けい)は そこまで...ナツキ･スバルに尽くせる？ (speaker, listener, both female)

卿は私にとって敵ということになる

...

Previous comment discussed breaking off [3] as its own entry. Given that this is evidently in modern use, I would be in favor.

[3]/けい came up in a "life-in-another-knights-and-dragons-fantasy world" anime/manga. It was used repeatedly as a 2nd person pronoun (the "lower status" relationship was definitely present, speaker was a high-class candidate for ruler of an entire midlevel-ish fantasy realm), with the reading けい.  (used ~40 times over two seasons, based on searching the Japanese subtitles). (a few of this were [1], as a suffix to a name, but I heard "kei" repeatedly in a fairly extended dialog and had no idea what it meant). 

Not claiming that anime dictates "correct" usage, but for reference the speaker was female.  Pronoun was used for both female and male recipients.  Both might be considered "subjects" in a broad sense(speaker was making a claim to leadership), but they were actually lower-level members of a competing faction.  sankoku says nothing at all about gender(obviously in a real historical context, the players would generally be male, but this seems unnecessary to specify, and possibly just incorrect). 

The editorial policy does not seem to have guidance on [arch] for this kind of thing(i.e. simple vocabulary). [arch] on kanji and verb forms seems to point towards modern unrecognizability.  I usually read [arch] as "ignore this information for practical purposes".  Apparently not quite the case here.  It looks like this term is *maybe* [arch] in the way that "thou" is [arch] in English.  i.e. still-in-well-understood use for historical flavoring. (Maybe there are other modern uses of 卿/けい, I wouldn't know). (The subtitles gave okurigana for the first use of 卿 in each episode it was used, I don't know how globally understood this would be, or if a reader would just pick it up from context and knowing the "sense" of 卿.)

Incidentally, we have なんじ(汝) as [arch], おんみ(御身) is not.  These are both in sankoku as 文 as well . 汝's definition is simply "おまえ". おんみ gets two senses, one of which matches ours, the other is 古風(...circumstances of use...)あなた。なんじ.

searching subtitles of the same series, 汝 appears once in the regular series, but 20 times in a single two-hour side-movie (different context demanded it, I guess). 御身 appears 3 times(no furigana).

@@ -33,2 +32,0 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<misc>&male;</misc>
@@ -36 +34,3 @@
-<gloss>you (in reference to someone of lower status)</gloss>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>you (in reference to someone of lower status, esp. by a lord to a subject)</gloss>

luminous, genius, RP
daijr: 世襲的に国家を代表し，統帥する最高の地位にある人。

I don't think "ruler" should lead.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>ruler</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>ruler</gloss>
+<gloss>liege (lord)</gloss>

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

ルミナス和英辞典, 新和英中辞典

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<gloss>sovereign</gloss>

gg5

I think it's dated at the very least. The smaller kokugos don't have it.
I don't think the x-refs are needed.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2525960">懇意になる</xref>
@@ -21 +20 @@
-<gloss>close relationship</gloss>
+<gloss>(on) familiar terms</gloss>
@@ -27 +26 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1277530">好意・1</xref>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
@@ -29,3 +28 @@
-<gloss>favor</gloss>
-<gloss>favour</gloss>
-<gloss>friendliness</gloss>
+<gloss>goodwill</gloss>

GG5 leads with "kindness".

@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<misc>&obs;</misc>

[2] is identified as a secondary, not-very-well-known meaning
https://oggi.jp/6277173
「懇意（こんい）」には、あまり知られていないもう一つの意味があります。それは、「親切な気持ち」や「好意」といった意味です。一般的に、こうした意味で使われることはありません。

https://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/懇意
[1](古用法) 親切。
[2]交際が親密であること。ねんごろ。

daijs[2]: 親切な心。

"close relationship" comes up a few times.  Saying "close friendship" might be saying a bit too much.
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/懇意

"kindness" did not seem to fit the others in [1]. After searching, seems there is a distinct sense in the kokugos, so I have split.

Not confident on what to do with [2] because it's hard to find clear examples of.  wiktionary just says "親切", kokugos say 親切な心.  [2] seems absent from sankoku, wiktionary marks 古用法.  First reference likens to 「親切な気持ち」や「好意」, I've xrefed the latter. [dated] suggests old-fashioned, this seems to be no longer in use, in favor of a different common meaning, so I've guessed [obs].

For [1], seems like the usual collocation is ~にしている, but we don't have that one. ("to be on intimate terms with", rather than "become close friends with"). Might be worth adding, in eijiro:
～と懇意にしている
be on friendly terms with
人）と懇意にしている
have a close friendship with
be on familiar terms with

@@ -18,0 +19,10 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2525960">懇意になる</xref>
+<gloss>friendship</gloss>
+<gloss>close relationship</gloss>
+<gloss>intimacy</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1277530">好意・1</xref>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
@@ -20,2 +30,3 @@
-<gloss>intimacy</gloss>
-<gloss>friendship</gloss>
+<gloss>favor</gloss>
+<gloss>favour</gloss>
+<gloss>friendliness</gloss>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>to discount</gloss>
@@ -23,2 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>to make allowances for something</gloss>
-<gloss>to bear something in mind</gloss>
+<gloss>to make allowances (for something)</gloss>
+<gloss>to bear (something) in mind</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +22,1 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -26,0 +28,1 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Added "to make allowances for something" to [2]. "to bear something in mind" is not wrong, but requires the context provided by the more accurate "to make allowances for something" to make full sense.

@@ -21,0 +21,1 @@
+<gloss>to make allowances for something</gloss>

GG5 and other JEs, RP.

I don't think it's dated. Xref unnecessary.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<misc>&dated;</misc>
@@ -20,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>nutrition</gloss>

sankoku: 「古風」栄養

滋養	326849	4.0%
栄養	7872415	96.0%

I've certainly encountered 栄養 everywhere. Never seen this in the wild.

@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1173990">栄養</xref>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>

滋養	326792
滋養の	7381	  
滋養のある	3163	  
滋養の高い	502	  
滋養のため	466	  
滋養のつく	323	 
....

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5, prog

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>deflation</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>shrinkage</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>deflation</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5: ～する〔短縮する〕 contract; shrink

I don't think we need a separate sense for a specific type of contraction.

@@ -30,8 +30,2 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2582050">瞳孔縮小</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>contraction (of the pupil)</gloss>
+<gloss>contraction</gloss>
+<gloss>shrinkage</gloss>

You don't usually have antonyms of physical processes.

@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1205200">拡大</xref>
@@ -36 +34,0 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="2128980">散大</xref>
@@ -37,0 +36 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=pupil+contraction
contraction of the pupil
瞳孔収縮

瞳孔収縮	249	52.0%
瞳孔縮小	230	48.0%

sankoku gives this antonym for [1], weblio has exactly one antonym and it is the same:
https://thesaurus.weblio.jp/antonym/content/縮小
対義語・反対語	縮小	⇔	拡大

I made a mistake.  sankoku does not [ant] to 散大, it xrefs to 拡大(i.e. it doesn't mention this "eye" usage at all). I've also found a related formulation for pupil contraction (which we don't have) 瞳孔収縮.   収縮 has a more easily comprehensible gloss in this context. (while ngrams are similar, google finds far more for 瞳孔縮小).

The wikipedia article on miosis uses 縮小 and 収縮 in the same breath, with the latter (perhaps coincidentally, perhaps not) used as a verb to describe the normal contraction of the pupil:
~とは医学において、疾患や薬物、外傷によって瞳孔が過度に縮小する現象である。瞳孔は普通日向では収縮、...

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1205200">拡大</xref>

瞳孔縮小	230	8.9%
瞳孔散大	2359	91.1%

瞳孔縮小	230	8.3%
瞳孔散大	2359	85.0%
瞳孔は縮小	38	1.4%
瞳孔が縮小	104	3.7%
瞳孔を縮小	45	1.6% <-- note: 瞳孔を縮小させる, not [vt]
瞳孔を散大	130	<-- dilation, also [vi] /させる

散大 is apparently limited to pupils.  This entry is more broad, but is the [ant]/analogue for pupil contraction.  See xrefs for confirmation. 

I used [ant] because it was already in use for 瞳孔散大, but [see] is fine with me. sankoku seems to flags as [ant].

sankoku gives two senses, neither of which is *limited* to eyes.  (So, maybe there is a 3rd sense here, i.e. a split of [1], or maybe it's fine as is). But I split [2] off because it would seem to *not* be [vt] (sankoku otherwise agrees that [1] is [vt,vi]), and I think the xref is valuable.

@@ -29,0 +30,8 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="ant" seq="2128980">散大</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2582050">瞳孔縮小</xref>
+<gloss>contraction (of the pupil)</gloss>

研究社新和英大辞典第５版

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>esoteric</gloss>

???
装甲	496856	42.0%
そうこう	685782	58.0%
装甲う	489	0.0%

Needs reference as the usage is very low.

@@ -13,3 +12,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>装甲う</reb>

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>装甲う</reb>

mk

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, daijr/s

装甲した, not 装甲の.

@@ -16,3 +16,5 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>armored</gloss>
-<gloss>armoured</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>armoring</gloss>
+<gloss>armouring</gloss>
+<gloss>armor</gloss>
+<gloss>armour</gloss>

gg5, daij
prog: だれが計画をぶち壊したのか  Who wrecked [ruined] our plans?

I think "wreck" works better for sense 2.

@@ -26,3 +26,3 @@
-<gloss>to crush</gloss>
-<gloss>to break by striking</gloss>
-<gloss>to wreck</gloss>
+<gloss>to break (by striking)</gloss>
+<gloss>to smash</gloss>
+<gloss>to knock down</gloss>
@@ -32,0 +33 @@
+<gloss>to ruin (a plan, atmosphere, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -34 +35 @@
-<gloss>to ruin</gloss>
+<gloss>to wreck</gloss>

Since 打ち is far more likely to be read うち, I think the 打ち search forms should direct to that entry instead of this one.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,8 +16,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>打ちこわす</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>打壊す</keb>

Reopen.

Because it only applies to sense 2 and we prefer to this approach to having a [restr=しま] tag on sense 1.

why is シマ search-only?

https://www.keiben-oasis.com/keibenterms/シマ
シマを荒らす	1,262		
島を荒らす	103	
ヤクザのシマ	158		
ヤクザの島	0

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -31 +31,2 @@
-<gloss>one's territory (e.g. of a sex worker, organized crime gang)</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. written as シマ</s_inf>
+<gloss>one's territory (of a sex worker, organized crime gang, etc.)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬────────────┬───────╮
│ 島　 │ 18,648,251 │ 91.1% │
│ 嶋　 │    895,666 │  4.4% │
│ シマ │    924,859 │  4.5% │
╰─ーー─┴────────────┴───────╯

found used for the 2nd sense

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>シマ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1599710">縄張り・2</xref>

Indeed

@@ -6,2 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf31</ke_pri>
@@ -11,2 +8,0 @@
-<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf31</re_pri>

News tags here must be wrong...?

Not sure overgrowth works.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>overgrowth</gloss>
+<gloss>growing lushly</gloss>

繁茂	81625	  
繁茂し	41638	  
繁茂する	16767
繁茂さ	1901	

eijiro has lots of glosses, but:
繁茂する
形
flourishing（植物が）
繁茂して
副
flourishingly
luxuriantly

繁茂
exuberance（植物の）
luxuriance（植物などの）〔【形】luxuriant〕
luxuriant growth（植物などの）
overgrowth〔不可算〕
...

https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/繁茂
... flourish in the warm Gulf
... flourish in summer
... lush tropical gardens (繁茂した熱帯の庭園)
...  caused by an overgrowth of the yeast fungus ... (酵母菌の繁茂で引き起こされた
... lush forests
... lush aquatic plants
... a landslide or a trail overgrown with brush (繁茂した登山道など)

sankoku and wiktionary's definitions are both "おいしげること".  Our gloss for 生い茂る is: "to grow thickly; to be overgrown; to thrive; to grow in abundance"

usually verbal(almost 75% of ngrams).  reverso often has "lush" especially, then "flourish" and "overgrowth"

Unfortunately I don't see how to get "lush" in here, which seems quite common. Maybe as a separate [exp] entry "繁茂した" if it were worth it.

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>flourishing (of plants)</gloss>
+<gloss>thriving</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>overgrowth</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

〈蓼／たで／タデ〉〈食／く〉う〈虫／むし／ムシ〉も〈好／す〉き〈好／ず〉き

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 蓼食う虫も好き好き　　 │ 6,356 │ 59.6% │
│ 蓼食う虫も好きずき　　 │ 1,298 │ 12.2% │ - add, sK
│ たで食う虫も好きずき　 │   851 │  8.0% │ - add, sK
│ たで食う虫も好き好き　 │   468 │  4.4% │ - add, sK (sankoku)
│ タデ食う虫も好き好き　 │   359 │  3.4% │ - sK
│ タデ食う虫も好きずき　 │   313 │  2.9% │
│ 蓼喰う虫も好き好き　　 │   225 │  2.1% │ - sK
│ 蓼食う虫もすきずき　　 │   215 │  2.0% │
│ 蓼喰う虫も好きずき　　 │   112 │  1.0% │
│ タデ喰う虫も好きずき　 │    64 │  0.6% │
│ タデ喰う虫も好き好き　 │    61 │  0.6% │ - sK
│ たで喰う虫も好き好き　 │    40 │  0.4% │
│ タデ食う虫もすきずき　 │    38 │  0.4% │
│ たで食う虫もすきずき　 │    35 │  0.3% │
│ 蓼くう虫も好き好き　　 │    29 │  0.3% │
│ たで喰う虫も好きずき　 │    20 │  0.2% │
│ たでくうむしもすきずき │   184 │  1.7% │
╰─ーーーーーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,12 @@
+<keb>蓼食う虫も好きずき</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>たで食う虫も好きずき</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>たで食う虫も好き好き</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +21 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +25 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +29 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,7 +32,0 @@
-<re_restr>蓼食う虫も好き好き</re_restr>
-<re_restr>蓼喰う虫も好き好き</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>タデくうむしもすきずき</reb>
-<re_restr>タデ食う虫も好き好き</re_restr>
-<re_restr>タデ喰う虫も好き好き</re_restr>

蓼食う虫も好き好き	6356
タデ喰う虫も好き好き	61
蓼喰ふ虫も好き好き	< 20
蓼喰う虫も好き好き	225
タデ食う虫も好き好き	359

I bumped into a couple of these variants (one is in the Tanaka sentences.)
The novel called 蓼喰ふ虫 mentioned by Nils is by 谷崎潤一郎作 from 1929.

@@ -6,0 +7,9 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>タデ食う虫も好き好き</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蓼喰う虫も好き好き</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>タデ喰う虫も好き好き</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +18,7 @@
+<re_restr>蓼食う虫も好き好き</re_restr>
+<re_restr>蓼喰う虫も好き好き</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>タデくうむしもすきずき</reb>
+<re_restr>タデ食う虫も好き好き</re_restr>
+<re_restr>タデ喰う虫も好き好き</re_restr>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&proverb;</misc>

縄張り	239915	80.4%
縄張	12395	4.2%
なわ張り	4144	1.4%
繩張り	277	0.1%
なわばり	41582	13.9%

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18 +19 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

daij, koj, meikyo

The kokugos have a separate "territory" sense.

@@ -40,0 +41,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&zool;</field>
+<gloss>territory (of an animal)</gloss>
+</sense>

縄張り	239915
縄張	12395
繩張り	277
なわ張り	4144 <- seen in dictionary explanations.

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>なわ張り</keb>

GG5: nutrition; a nutrient
Reverso has a couple of "nutrition" mtches too.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>nutrition</gloss>

Nutrient:
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/栄養分

Eijiro
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=栄養分

See comments on 養分.  They all apply here(pretty sure the terms are synonymous).  eijiro has some more fanciful glosses under this term, but I don't think they negate the point.

I had to look up what "nutriment" means.  I think "nutrient" is actually the correct term in this case.

I like this eijiro gloss:
栄養分を強化したパン
fortified bread

Obviously, it was "nutrients" that were added, not "nutrition".

Looking at the eijiro examples, we could certainly add, for example, an entry "to nourish"
栄養分を与える	1265

But I don't think that makes 栄養分 into "nourishment" (or nutrition).

@@ -16,3 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>nutriment</gloss>
-<gloss>nutritious substance</gloss>
-<gloss>nourishment</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1174040">栄養素</xref>
+<gloss>nutrient</gloss>

Ref: "originally means “a spy”, but nowadays it’s more often used to indicate a person who advertises something (often in a stealthy way)."

I've looked at this a few times but I can't think of a better set of glosses.

Daijisen sense 2: 俗に、あるものの関係者のようにふるまい、ひいきをする人。「メーカーの―であるかのように商品をほめちぎる」

https://takashionary.com/mawashi-mono-meaning/

I'm not sure "stealth advertiser" is quite right; feel free to improve the English definition...

@@ -18,0 +19,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>shill</gloss>
+<gloss>stealth advertiser</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>まわし者</keb>
@@ -12,0 +15,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1215620">間諜</xref>

The JEs lead with nourishment. I don't think it confuses. The xrefs don't seem to add anything.

@@ -16,3 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1624300">栄養分</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1624300">栄養分</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1174040">栄養素</xref>
@@ -19,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>nourishment</gloss>

sankoku: 栄養となる成分. 
daijs: 栄養となる成分。
daijs(滋養分): 飲食物に含まれている、身体の栄養となる成分。栄養分。

Eijiro is overwhelmingly "nutrient"
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=養分

Reverso is overwhelmingly "nutrient".
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/養分

These are all "nutrient" in English(most of the time):
栄養素	1261921	72.0%
栄養分	265091	15.1%
養分	197392	11.3%
滋養分	3046	0.2%
Slightly different...
栄養物	23578	1.3%
滋養物	1108	0.1%

Variations on "nutritious" ("having nutrients"):
養分のある	220	2.7%
栄養分のある	363	4.5%
栄養素のある	155	1.9%
養分がある	296	3.6%
栄養分がある	850	10.4%
栄養素がある	2103	25.8%
滋養のある	3163	38.9%
滋養がある	886	10.9%
滋養分がある	24	0.3%
滋養分のある	40	0.5%

The term 成分 used by the kokugos seems to suggest "nutrient" pretty strongly to begin with.

There are unfortunately a few terms that all gloss as "nutrient":
栄養素
栄養分　滋養分(dated)　養分

The nuances vary a bit, it really appears the English glosses are all the same, i.e. "nutrient".  

eijiro basically sticks to "nutrient" for 50+ glosses, with only a few contextually morphed into "nutrition", "nutritious", or "nourishment" with specific contexts.  For "nourishment" contexts, "nutrient" can always be used instead.  reverso is the same, almost entirely "nutrient".

This example from eijiro is a certainly a good translation:
傷んだ肌に栄養分を与える
nourish damaged skin

But I think adding "nourishment" to this entry, or "nutrition", just confuses the term.

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>nourishment</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1624300">栄養分</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1174040">栄養素</xref>

OK. Done.

I think this should be merged with 跳ね上げる. Only the "flip up" sense would need a restriction.

splitting.

prog also has "make an upward stroke as one lifts one's brush", but there's no evidence in any kokugo

@@ -17 +17,5 @@
-<gloss>to raise</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to raise (e.g. prices)</gloss>

GG5 (uses はね上げる in its sole example).
Google n-grams:
はね上げる	1735
撥ね上げる	236
はねあげる	864
跳ね上げる	16767

The problem s that はね上げる could equally well be 跳ね上げる. 跳ね上げる is odd - much more common, but not in references. It's probably "just" the transitive form of 跳ね上る. Certainly Google searches for  跳ね上る + はね上げる bring upmore hits that for 撥ね上げる + はね上げる. Possibly はね上げる needs to be added to 跳ね上げる as well. Need to think about it.

gg5, prog

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>making a surgical incision in the abdomen</gloss>
+<gloss>making an incision in the abdomen</gloss>
+<gloss>performing a laparotomy</gloss>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

少欲	3471	66.4%
小欲	1755	33.6%
少慾	0	0.0%
小慾	0	0.0%

or sK

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

not an [ant]

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1786610">大欲</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1786610">大欲</xref>

shinmeikai
しょう(オ) よく【少欲】
セウ－
【少欲】
わずかの欲。

｢少｣は｢小｣、｢欲｣は｢〈慾｣とも書く。

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1786610">大欲</xref>

Koj, Daijr, Wadoku, EDR

Koj & Daijr have 小欲 & 少欲 in that order and GG5 only has 小欲. WWW-based counts have 少欲 leading 2:1, which probably reflects modern practice.
Wadoku includes 少慾 and 小慾. The only ref I can find is EDR, which has them as alternative forms of the other two. Since 欲 and 慾 are known 異体字 this is probably OK.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>少欲</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11,4 @@
-<keb>少欲</keb>
+<keb>少慾</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>小慾</keb>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

Merging 1349280.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>少欲</keb>
@@ -12 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>only slightly covetous</gloss>
+<gloss>(being) slightly covetous</gloss>
+<gloss>a little covetousness</gloss>

I don't think [dated] is appropriate here.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&dated;</misc>

GG5: nourishing [nutritious] food [sustenance]; nourishment; nutriment; aliment; nutrient.
中辞典: nourishing [nutritious] food; nourishment

@@ -12,2 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2128860">栄養物</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2128860">栄養物</xref>
@@ -14,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>nutritious food</gloss>

All "nourishment"
https://tr-ex.me/翻訳/日本語-英語/滋養物?search=滋養物

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=滋養物
nourishing food
nourishment（生命・健康を維持するために必要な）〔不可算〕
nutriment〔可算〕

daijs:
栄養物: 栄養素を多く含んだ飲食物。
滋養物: 滋養分を多く含んだ飲食物。滋養品。
滋養品: 栄養になる食物。滋養が多く含まれる飲食品。滋養物 (滋養品 is pretty rare, and we don't have it)

daijs glosses for 栄養物 and 滋養物 are clearly the same(apart from 栄養素 vs 滋養分).  But the few reverso entries for 滋養物 gloss it as "nourishment" (which is agnostic to food or drink). 

They are both explicitly not limited to food by daijs(飲食物).  daijs says "high in nutrients" but this doesn't appear in eijiro for any translations I've seen. Maybe "nourishment" carries this nuance well enough.

If I think this is a bit [dated], that would be consistent with thinking "nourishment" is a bit dated. I need some other opinions at this point. Maybe "nourishment" does belong at the xref. Maybe some xref terms belong here.

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>nourishing or nutritious food</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2128860">栄養物</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2128860">栄養物</xref>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
+<gloss>nourishment</gloss>

大欲	8161	98.9%
大慾	88	1.1%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

koj, meikyo, daij

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>大慾</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>だいよく</reb>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1744250">少欲</xref>

I meant to put sK on 打割る.

Nikkoku has it, for what it's worth.
https://kotobank.jp/word/打割-2011304

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ ぶち割って │ 1,085 │ 26.6% │ - (not insignificant)
│ 打ち割って │   435 │ 10.7% │
│ 打割って　 │    22 │  0.5% │
│ うちわって │ 2,452 │ 60.1% │
│ ぶちわって │    85 │  2.1% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

打割る wouldn't be [rK] since it's the okurigana usage that is rare, not the kanji usage.

@@ -9 +9,4 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ぶち割る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +16,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ぶちわる</reb>

打ち割る	288	93.2%
打割る	21	6.8%
GG5 and kokugos only have うちわる.

I can't find ぶちわる anywhere. I think it can go.

@@ -6,0 +7,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>打割る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,3 +12,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ぶちわる</reb>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>to divide</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>to speak frankly</gloss>

打ち is rK for ぶ Suggest aplitringち

〈霧／きり／キリ〉に〈覆（わ）／おおわ〉れ

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 霧に覆われ　　 │ 11,345 │ 92.5% │
│ 霧におおわれ　 │    869 │  7.1% │ - add, sK
│ キリに覆われ　 │     23 │  0.2% │
│ きりにおおわれ │     27 │  0.2% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

I don't think the x-ref is needed. Neither expression is especially common.

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>霧におおわれる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,2 +16,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1870810">霧に包まれる</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1870810">霧に包まれる</xref>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=霧に覆われる
海霧に覆われる
be enveloped in a sea fog

Might as well be consistent with xref.  If one of 覆 or 包 were to get the strong "concealment" sense of "shroud", I would have picked this one.

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>to be enveloped in mist</gloss>
+<gloss>to be shrouded in mist</gloss>
+<gloss>to be enveloped in fog</gloss>

〈霧／きり／キリ〉に〈包／つつ〉まれ

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 霧に包まれ　　 │ 34,124 │ 85.1% │
│ 霧につつまれ　 │  5,409 │ 13.5% │ - add, sK
│ きりに包まれ　 │     91 │  0.2% │
│ キリに包まれ　 │     67 │  0.2% │
│ きりにつつまれ │    425 │  1.1% │
│ キリにつつまれ │      0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>霧につつまれる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

霧に包まれ	34124	

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/en/fog/
The town is fogged in.
町はすっぽり霧に包まれている

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/en/霧に包まれる/
be enveloped by [in] a fog
⇒霧の全ての連語・コロケーションを見る

A non-mist modern article.  Enveloped by fog from nuclear coolant steam(with picture of haze):
https://newsdig.tbs.co.jp/articles/-/166321
２９日朝、松江市などでは、放射冷却の影響で 濃い霧に包まれました。

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=霧に
夜霧に包まれている
be enveloped in a night fog
単語帳
海霧に覆われる
be enveloped in a sea fog
単語帳
深い霧に包まれている
be enveloped in a dense fog

merits a plain "fog" gloss I think. or just "wrapped in".  in fog? by fog? "in" wins on the numbers. Maybe "by" is more active (also the "doer" grammatically in Japanese). I don't know.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>to be enveloped in fog</gloss>

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

meikyo

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>

sincethe glosses are adv

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -12 +12,0 @@
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>

shinmeikai merges also

GG5

Mainly wanting to make this look less like 1254360 (決然 （けつぜん） (n,adj-t,adv-to) decisive; resolute; determined). Wadoku merges them, but I think it's a mistake. No other source merges them.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>resolute</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>with alacrity</gloss>
+<gloss>resolutely</gloss>

For comparison with related 愉 terms
愉悦	31531	50.4%
愉楽	19354	31.0%

This term
愉色	81	0.1%
nikk, daijs xref
喜色	11547	18.5%


daijs: 愉快そうな顔つき。喜色。
nikk: 〘名〙 楽しそうな顔色。よろこばしげな顔つき。喜色。

Note 喜色 is commonly part of a larger expression
喜色	11547	  
喜色満面	7494	  
喜色を	1629	

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/喜色
delight
A glad countenance; a joyful look; a smile
喜色を帯びる
to wear a joyful look

研究社 新和英中辞典での「喜色」の英訳
きしょく３ 喜色
a pleased [【形式ばった表現】 joyful] look.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1218850">喜色</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
@@ -13,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>joyful look</gloss>

wiki
https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/30時間制
photos of real-life usage
https://twitter.com/r1_nakagawa/status/1415972778583289858

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,0 +26 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -38,0 +42,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagk>３０</stagk>
+<pos>&num;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>as 30時, 30:00, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>6am</gloss>

Well, no-one is concerned enough to comment, so I'll wave it through.

卅	5103
丗	927
参拾	11705

I can't help feeling that 参拾, 卅 and 丗, while correct in meaning and reading, clutter thin entry a bit. I wonder if it would be cleaner to move them, and the equivalents in other number entries, into a separate entry with an annotation saying they are mainly used in historical and legal contexts.

@@ -13,0 +14,6 @@
+<keb>三〇</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>参拾</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -17,3 +22,0 @@
-<keb>三〇</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -21,3 +23,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>参拾</keb>

https://www.benricho.org/kanji/kansuji.html

@@ -18,0 +19,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>丗</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>参拾</keb>
+</k_ele>

gg5

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<field>&math;</field>

瞳孔拡張	102		
瞳孔散大	2,359		
散瞳	10,865

I don't think this is needed. Rare compound. Only eijiro has it.

OK, I switched the readings in 3 other 発疹 entries.

I think this is similar to the ３０分 as -じゅっぷん vs -じっぷん situation on entry 2859157 in which -じゅっぷん is the commonly used version. And たぐい as 類い vs 類 in entry 1596870.

はっしん might be more common in 50 years if the Ministry of Education is successful in steering the language that way, but it seems safe to stick with ほっしん for now.

High time we resolved this one. I'll move ほっしん to the front, approve and reopen.
If this is agreed, we should do all the 発疹 entries.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<reb>とっぱつせいはっしん</reb>
+<reb>とっぱつせいほっしん</reb>
@@ -15 +15 @@
-<reb>とっぱつせいほっしん</reb>
+<reb>とっぱつせいはっしん</reb>

To clarify, I meant people on twitter are complaining about NHK anchors pronouncing it as "はっしん"
Lots of anger and confusion

daijr/s, koj

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&v2r-s;</pos>

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1224970">戯れる・2</xref>

Entry created

Absurd.

〈喉／のど／ノド〉〈越（し）／ごし／ゴシ〉の〈良い／よい／いい〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 喉越しの良い　 │ 6,752 │ 15.4% │
│ のどごしの良い │ 5,333 │ 12.2% │
│ のど越しの良い │ 4,057 │  9.3% │
│ 喉ごしの良い　 │ 3,826 │  8.7% │
│ のど越しのいい │ 2,948 │  6.7% │
│ 喉越しのいい　 │ 2,779 │  6.3% │
│ 喉ごしのよい　 │ 2,461 │  5.6% │
│ 喉越しのよい　 │ 2,358 │  5.4% │
│ のど越しのよい │ 2,255 │  5.1% │
│ 喉ごしのいい　 │ 2,038 │  4.7% │
│ ノド越しの良い │   267 │  0.6% │
│ ノド越しのよい │   182 │  0.4% │
│ ノド越しのいい │   169 │  0.4% │
│ ノドごしの良い │   117 │  0.3% │
│ 喉越の良い　　 │    29 │  0.1% │
│ 喉ゴシの良い　 │    22 │  0.1% │
│ のどごしのよい │ 5,847 │ 13.3% │
│ のどごしのいい │ 2,242 │  5.1% │
│ ノドごしのいい │    57 │  0.1% │
│ ノドごしのよい │    42 │  0.1% │
│ ノドゴシのよい │    20 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

Adding all the forms with >3% in frequency order

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<keb>のどごしの良い</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +13,9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>喉ごしの良い</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>のど越しのいい</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +25 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14 +28,2 @@
-<keb>のど越しのいい</keb>
+<keb>喉ごしのよい</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +33 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +37,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>喉ごしのいい</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,5 +44 @@
-<reb>のどごしのよい</reb>
-<re_restr>喉越しの良い</re_restr>
-<re_restr>のど越しの良い</re_restr>
-<re_restr>喉越しのよい</re_restr>
-<re_restr>のど越しのよい</re_restr>
+<reb>のどごしのいい</reb>
@@ -30,5 +47 @@
-<reb>のどごしのいい</reb>
-<re_restr>喉越しの良い</re_restr>
-<re_restr>のど越しの良い</re_restr>
-<re_restr>喉越しのいい</re_restr>
-<re_restr>のど越しのいい</re_restr>
+<reb>のどごしのよい</reb>

のど越しの良い	4057
のど越しのいい	2948
のど越しのよい	2255

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>のど越しの良い</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>のど越しのいい</keb>
@@ -12,0 +19,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>のど越しのよい</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -15,0 +25 @@
+<re_restr>のど越しの良い</re_restr>
@@ -16,0 +27 @@
+<re_restr>のど越しのよい</re_restr>
@@ -20,0 +32 @@
+<re_restr>のど越しの良い</re_restr>
@@ -21,0 +34 @@
+<re_restr>のど越しのいい</re_restr>
@@ -26,2 +39 @@
-<s_inf>esp. of beer</s_inf>
-<gloss>going down smoothly</gloss>
+<gloss>going down smoothly (esp. of beer)</gloss>

喉越しのいい	2779
のどごしのいい	2242
喉越しの良い	6752
喉越しのよい	2358
のどごしのよい	5847
ノドゴシのよい	20

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>喉越しのいい</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +15,7 @@
+<re_restr>喉越しの良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>喉越しのよい</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>のどごしのいい</reb>
+<re_restr>喉越しの良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>喉越しのいい</re_restr>
@@ -15 +25 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーーー─┬────────╮
│ 嬉遊曲　　　　　　　 │  5,285 │
│ 喜遊曲　　　　　　　 │  1,004 │ - add (meikyo, sankoku, smk)
│ きゆうきょく　　　　 │     39 │
├─ーーーーーーーーーー─┼────────┤
│ ディヴェルティメント │ 16,336 │
│ ディベルティメント　 │  6,034 │ - (cross referenced in most kokugos)
╰─ーーーーーーーーーー─┴────────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>喜遊曲</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1082340">ディベルティメント</xref>
+<field>&music;</field>

Entry created

We don't capitalise "n" on other "nth" entries.
Not sure the note is needed.

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<s_inf>after a number N</s_inf>
-<gloss>the Nth time</gloss>
+<s_inf>after a number n</s_inf>
+<gloss>nth time</gloss>

回目	10653329	73.2%
度目	3894067	26.8%

I believe it is accurate to say that these expressions are essentially interchangeable, but that the xref is more common.

xref to help keep these in sync. The glosses should match.

I like "following" but "after" seems more common.  We don't usually do variable substitution, so this is interesting.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1199780">回目</xref>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>(after a number N) the Nth time</gloss>
+<s_inf>after a number N</s_inf>
+<gloss>the Nth time</gloss>

Can drop the explanation of nutrition.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>nutrition (i.e. food or other nourishment)</gloss>
+<gloss>nutritious food</gloss>
+<gloss>nourishing food</gloss>
+<gloss>nutrition</gloss>

適切な栄養物	529	36.6% proper nutrition
よい栄養物	506	35.0%  good nutrition
スポーツの栄養物	271	18.8% sports nutrition (not "the science of", but food for)
悪い栄養物	138	9.6%  poor nutrition

All "nutrition", including some collocations:
https://tr-ex.me/翻訳/日本語-英語/栄養物

Everything (mostly nutrition)
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/栄養物

A fair number of nutrients (maybe 1/3 of "nutrition")
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/栄養物#nutrients

"nutrition" in this sense:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/nutrition
the substances that you take into your body as food [and the way that they influence your health]:
Good nutrition is essential if patients are to make a quick recovery.


https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nutrition
NOURISHMENT sense 1
… get adequate nutrition both before and during the race.
: FOOD, NUTRIMENT

Oxford:
food or nourishment.
"a feeding tube gives her nutrition and water"

========== Some hits for "nutrients" outside of reverso

https://tr-ex.me/翻訳/日本語-英語/栄養物
get/take （enough）nutrients は、nutrientは形容詞で栄養を含む、滋養になることを言います。また、名詞では、栄養物、栄養になる食物、栄養素を指します。

https://nativecamp.net/blog/20230607-nutrition
栄養摂取はnutrient intake、nutrientは栄養物や栄養素、intakeは食物などの摂取を表すためです。

If kept, I think "nutrients" needs to be plural here (various ~物 terms are plural).  This is never 1 nutrient (栄養素). 

It doesn't seem like it should be, but the collocations and parallel translations seem to suggest that it is just "nutrition".

Critically, not the "science of nutrition", so some distinction is needed.

"nutriment" could go here, if others here are familiar with the word.  It never shows up in reverso, and I've never heard of it myself, and it doesn't come up in reverso at all.

"nourishment" is a synonym, but seems like an awkward(perhaps [dated]) gloss to me. At least, we don't talk about getting nourishment from breakfast cereal. All the translations I see that do this are quite stiff.

I didn't want to confuse "nutrient" given　栄養分 and 栄養素, but it seems there is a case for it.  At least it's plural here with some context.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>nutritive material</gloss>
+<gloss>nutrition (i.e. food or other nourishment)</gloss>
+<gloss>nutrients</gloss>

Entry created

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -14,2 +14 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1214090">管轄</xref>
-<gloss>concurrent jurisdiction (esp. an embassy serving neighboring countries)</gloss>
+<gloss>concurrent jurisdiction (esp. of an embassy serving neighboring countries)</gloss>

I think it can be trimmed a little.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>having concurrent jurisdiction over (esp. of an embassy serving neighboring countries)</gloss>
+<gloss>concurrent jurisdiction (esp. an embassy serving neighboring countries)</gloss>

Ample evidence for the second gloss:
https://glosbe.com/en/en/concurrent accreditation

First gloss (general jurisdiction over, Japanese version uses 管轄):
https://www.mofa.go.jp/j_info/visit/visa/procedure/note.html
An application for visa is made by the applicant him/herself at the Japanese Embassy / Consulate General with jurisdiction over the area in which the applicant lives or those with jurisdiction over the country of which the applicant’s passport is issued. 

The embassy of the Rebublic of Namibia in France also serves("is accredited") to Italy, Portugal and Spain(as they lack embassies). The following vocab is used:
https://www.embassyofnamibia.fr/about-the-high-commission.php
The Embassy of Namibia in Paris was established in 1990, and is accredited to France, Italy, Portugal and Spain. 

daijs:
(スル)管轄を二つ以上もつこと。特に、大使館を置いていない国に関する業務を、近隣国に置いた大使館が行うこと。

兼轄	2760	94.7%
にて兼轄	153	5.3%　<-- a very particular formal use (found in reverso)
で兼轄	0	0.0%

兼轄	2760	  
兼轄する	673	  <- heavy suru
兼轄し	634	  
兼轄国	149　<-- hmmm

[vs,vt]
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/大使館
カリブ海諸国地域やポリネシア、アフリカやヨーロッパの小国が多い地域では、その地域における比較的大きい国の1つの大使館が数か国を兼轄していることがある

[n,~の兼轄を開始] Noun usage(Embassy in Fiji(スバ) starts serving neighboring Tuvalu)：
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/在フィジー日本国大使館
スバの大使館が在ツバル日本国大使館（英語: Embassy of Japan in Tuvalu）の兼轄を開始する[4]

https://www.fj.emb-japan.go.jp/jointad/tv/en/index.html
Embassy of Japan in Tuvalu
The Embassy of Japan in the Republic of Fiji is accredited to Tuvalu

https://www.fj.emb-japan.go.jp/jointad/tv/en/aboutus.html
Diplomatic relationship with Tuvalu and Japan is with the Embassy of Japan in Fiji 
vs.
https://www.fj.emb-japan.go.jp/jointad/tv/ja/aboutus_j.html
ツバルは、在フィジー日本国大使館が兼轄しています。

========== all reverso below ========

https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/兼轄
 Mr. Masaharu Kono, Ambassador of Japan to Italy (with jurisdiction in Malta) 
... 副首相から河野雅治駐イタリア大使（マルタ兼轄）に対し ...

Mr. Motoi Kato, Japanese Ambassador to the Republic of Congo... ("gabon" is left out of the translation)
コンゴ共和国大使（ガボンにて兼轄）

please note that there is no Japanese embassy in Cyprus either because the Japanese embassy for Greece is in Athens.
ちなみに、キプロスの日本大使館は、在ギリシャ日本国大使館（アテネ）が兼轄しているため...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_accreditation
Dual accreditation is the practice in diplomacy of a country granting two separate responsibilities to a single diplomat. One prominent form of dual accreditation is for a diplomat to serve as the ambassador to two countries concurrently.[1] For example, Luxembourg's ambassador to the United States is also its non-resident ambassador to Canada and to Mexico

Bad example of "joint administration":
https://diplomacy.state.gov/encyclopedia/u-s-embassy-khartoum-sudan/
The United States established diplomatic relations with Sudan in 1956 following its independence from joint administration by Egypt and the United Kingdom.

Daijs says "especially embassies serving neighboring countries".  Reverso matches were all embassy-related. Google search returned an embassy website, wikipedia search first returns the article for 大使館, followed by the history of the embassy of fiji (which does 兼轄 for several neighboring island nations). 

兼轄 = concurrent 管轄. (In addition to daijs, 管轄 is used on the Japanese embassy website for "jurisdiction").

兼~ terms are one entity serving two roles (兼業, 兼務, 兼任, ...)
joint ("administer jointly") suggests two entities sharing one role.  That is why I looked into this, and I think the previous gloss was incorrect, or at least ambiguous.

You might have a tighter gloss, but note that the 兼~ terms seem to be necessarily wordy, and are usually given as gerunds:
兼務 1. serving concurrently as; holding the additional post of
兼業  perusing as a side business; doing in addition to one's main work; running (businesses) simultaneously
兼官  holding of concurrent (official) posts; concurrent post

@@ -13 +13,4 @@
-<gloss>joint administration</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1214090">管轄</xref>
+<gloss>having concurrent jurisdiction over (esp. of an embassy serving neighboring countries)</gloss>
+<gloss>concurrent accreditation</gloss>

Entry created

Took 15 years for someone to notice.

koj

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>

daijr, koj

Not an abbreviation.

@@ -12,2 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1486360">美しい</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -15,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>pretty</gloss>

Entry created

Meiji example in nikk

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>

Entry created

gg5

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&biol;</field>

Entry created

I think it's worth keeping.

gg5
ウェブ上	        248,968
ウェブ上で	122,435

Used as a noun.
Not sure this is needed as an entry.

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>on the Web</gloss>

Entry created

あり族	58	13.5%
アリ族	301	69.8%
蟻族	72	16.7%

中国で増殖中　大卒薄給「アリ族」の嘆き
nkkei, 2013

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>アリ族</keb>
+</k_ele>

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/ant-tribe

"Ant tribe" appears to be the usual English translation.
I don't think we need to explain the origin of the term.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>Chinese university graduates who have failed to find high-paying jobs</gloss>
-<gloss>ant people (because they often live in crowded housing)</gloss>
+<gloss>ant tribe (Chinese university graduates who have failed to find well-paid jobs)</gloss>

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

@@ -19,4 +19,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2564950">大薯</xref>
-<gloss>purple yam</gloss>
-<gloss>water yam (Dioscorea alata)</gloss>
-<gloss>winged yam</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2564950">ダイジョ</xref>
+<gloss>purple yam (Dioscorea alata)</gloss>
+<gloss>water yam</gloss>
@@ -31 +30 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1972180">芋貝</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1972180">イモガイ</xref>

紅芋	85761	59.8%
べにいも	8963	6.2%
ベニイモ	753	0.5%
紅いも	48026	33.5%

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>紅いも</keb>

also nokanji for the katakana.  and sense 3 at the least is probably [uk].  don't know about the others

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -29,0 +30,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/イモガイ#.E6.97.A5.E6.9C.AC.E5.91.A8.E8.BE.BA.E3.81.AB.E7.94.9F.E6.81.AF.E3.81.99.E3.82.8B.E7.A8.AE

@@ -29,1 +29,1 @@
-<gloss>a type of cone shell</gloss>
+<gloss>Conus pauperculus (species of cone shell)</gloss>

gg5

Daijs has "のれんを―・げて店に入ってくる" as an example sentence for 撥ね上げる so it seems the restriction isn't needed.

@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>to splash</gloss>
+<gloss>to splash (up)</gloss>
+<gloss>to spatter</gloss>
@@ -23 +23,0 @@
-<stagk>跳ね上げる</stagk>

Merging 1679820.

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>はね上げる</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>撥ね上げる</keb>
@@ -16,0 +23 @@
+<stagk>跳ね上げる</stagk>
@@ -25 +32 @@
-<gloss>to raise sharply</gloss>
+<gloss>to raise sharply (e.g. prices)</gloss>

sankoku, eijiro

Added sense.

@@ -13,3 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>to churn up</gloss>
-<gloss>to strike up</gloss>
-<gloss>to throw up</gloss>
+<gloss>to throw up (e.g. mud)</gloss>
+<gloss>to splash</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>to flip up</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,6 @@
-<gloss>to flip up</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to raise sharply</gloss>
+<gloss>to hike</gloss>

elec	electricity, elec. eng.	
electr	electronics

This is a bit borderline.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<field>&elec;</field>
+<field>&electr;</field>

マル〈チ／ティ／テ〉（ー）メータ（ー）

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ マルチメーター　 │ 5,834 │ 50.9% │
│ マルチメータ　　 │ 5,423 │ 47.4% │
│ マルティメーター │   194 │  1.7% │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

No idea what the difference between the [elec] and [electr] field tags is supposed to be

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マルティメーター</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<field>&elec;</field>

マルチメーター	5834
マルチメータ	5423

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マルチメータ</reb>

ランダムハウス英和大辞典

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, リーダーズ+プラス

岩稜	23249	100.0%
巌稜	0	0.0%
岩りょう	0	0.0%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Daijr, Wadoku

Wadoku also has 岩りょう.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>巌稜</keb>

daijs, eij
http://maru290.naturum.ne.jp/e788391.html
"エッジな岩稜で、高度感あって面白かった〜！"

is this better? should we skip the part about having more life experience 
?

kind of pol? or "casual [hon]"...

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>older person with more life experience</gloss>
+<gloss>person older than oneself (who has more life experience)</gloss>

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/人生の先輩
人生の先輩	68257
plenty of reverso examples

Tricky to gloss in English. 人生の先輩 is older and more experienced _than_ the speaker - or the person addressed.

紅芋タルト	6834	44.7%
紅いもタルト	8456	55.3%

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>紅いもタルト</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>Beniimo Tart</gloss>
+<field>&food;</field>
+<gloss>beniimo tart (tart made with purple sweet potatoes)</gloss>

https://glocals-y.com/okinawa-souvenir-english/

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
紅芋タルト	6834

I don't think the 内容語 x-ref is needed. We have it on 機能語.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="2226460">内容語</xref>

形式語	149
Eijiro

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>form word</gloss>

http://repository.fukujo.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/11470/483/1/横197_横213_日野資成_人文学部18号.pdf

https://soka.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/37124/files/nihongonihonbungaku0_24_9.pdf

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&proverb;</misc>

Quiet

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q12177806807

Proverb? Not sure this makes it as an entry but it appears in quite a lot of web pages.

@@ -11,2 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>every man, regardless of birth, has the chance to become someone with great power if he exerts himself</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>high status does not depend on birth</gloss>
+<gloss>every man can achieve great power if he exerts himself</gloss>

wiktionary nikk
王侯将相いずくんぞ	1878	 
fom the Chinese 
王侯將相寧有種乎

chujiten
遠路はるばる	59,362		
遠路はるばると	482

Not adv-to.

@@ -19,3 +19,3 @@
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
-<gloss>(come) such a long way</gloss>
-<gloss>(come) all this way</gloss>
+<gloss>(coming) such a long way</gloss>
+<gloss>all this way</gloss>
+<gloss>from far away</gloss>

中辞典
遠路はるばる	59362	86.7%
遠路遥々	8380	12.2%
遠路遥遥	690	1.0%

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>遠路遥遥</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,3 +18,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>such a long way</gloss>
-<gloss>all this way</gloss>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<gloss>(come) such a long way</gloss>
+<gloss>(come) all this way</gloss>

実用日本語表現辞典

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 遠路　　　　 │ 108,176 │ 61.5% │
│ 遠路はるばる │  59,362 │ 33.7% │
│ 遠路遥々　　 │   8,380 │  4.8% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

OK

Not really. It's not a trademark. There's several companies making various umatare. I think I've seen it on izakaya menus as well. (e.g. https://stat.ameba.jp/user_images/20191218/18/fry2567/04/f7/j/o0640064014680983804.jpg )

Is this not a product name?

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<reb>ウマたれ</reb>
+<reb>うまタレ</reb>

Quiet.

Better?

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>area frequented by the elderly (where drivers should exercise caution)</gloss>
+<gloss>area adjacent to retirement homes (where drivers should exercise caution)</gloss>

I feel thr fact it's usually around retirement homes should be mentioned (or it would be correct to call all roads in Japan a "silver zone")

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>area frequented by the elderly (drivers should exercise caution)</gloss>
+<gloss>area frequented by the elderly (where drivers should exercise caution)</gloss>

Trimming a bit. Does this work? (I avoided "pass" as it's a euphemism for dying.)

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>road where many elderly frequently pass (and drivers should exercise caution; usu. near retirement homes, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>area frequented by the elderly (drivers should exercise caution)</gloss>

wiki
シルバーゾーン	510
saw on a sign while walking

No legal distinction it seems

We once rented a holiday apartment in the Swiss alps, and they had that sort of bag. You had to pay quite a lot for them but it meant a PAYG garbage system.

30177

I don't think it's actually more common than 指定ごみ袋 today

Ridiculous.

I saw 29 used for 5am on official messaging from Shibuya ward.

I saw 29 used for 5am on official messaging from Shibuya ward.

I saw 29 used for 5am on official messaging from Shibuya ward.

Split from 1235870.
Daijr has two pronoun senses.

OK, I guess. Usually in capitals in Christian contexts.

@@ -19,2 +19 @@
-<gloss>sacred heart</gloss>
-<gloss>cor Jesu</gloss>
+<gloss>Sacred Heart</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/聖心-86015
Wiki

@@ -9,0 +10,6 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ひじりごころ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>みこころ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -13,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>cor Jesu</gloss>

Is the term actually used in Japanese Christianity? The quoted ref is for place/given names. The kokugos only have 聖心女子大学. etc.  The n-grams are most likely from names.

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/聖心

聖心	71206

I guess it's OK.

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q10157501225
q: 介護職員の方々は、「人生の大先輩の方々のお手伝いができ手嬉しい」とか「人生の大先輩の方々と共に生活できる」と言いますが、この【人生の大先輩】と敢えて表現することは、どういう意味がありますか？
ba: お年寄りとか、高齢者って、そう言う言われ方を好まない人たちもいるからじゃないでしょうか。一番気の利いた表現だと思います。


https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1318934818
お年寄りを人生の大先輩と呼ぶことについて・・・
気に入らないのは私だけ？

お年寄りはお年寄り。
高齢者は高齢者。
おばあちゃんはおばあちゃんです。

それをわざわざ人生の大先輩とか呼ぶのって、
なんかわざとらしくないですか？

Well, it is a common set phrase and apparently used euphimistically for old perople in general (see links).

I'm not sure this is needed. Feels overly compositional to me. We have an entry for 大先輩.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>person much older than oneself (who has muxh more life experience)</gloss>
+<gloss>person much older than oneself (who has much more life experience)</gloss>

wadoku
人生の先輩	68257	82.3%
人生の大先輩	14664	17.7%

kind of [hon]...

gg5, wikipedia
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/非局在化電子
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delocalized_electron

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ 非局在　　 │ 3,666 │
│ 非局在化　 │ 2,626 │
│ 非局在電子 │    94 │
│ 非局在軌道 │     0 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────╯