https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/エンターテインメント

I think エンターテインメント should lead. More refs have it as a headword. It's the form NHK uses. N-gram counts are similar.

@@ -4,0 +5,4 @@
+<reb>エンターテインメント</reb>
+<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -7,4 +10,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>エンターテインメント</reb>
-<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>

!!

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

エンタ（ー）テ（イ／ィ／ー）（ン）メント

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ エンターテイメント　 │ 1,943,149 │ 45.6% │ - (meikyo, shinsen, obunsha)
│ エンターテインメント │ 1,767,388 │ 41.4% │ - (daijr/s, koj, smk, sankoku, gg5, etc.)
│ エンタテインメント　 │   325,767 │  7.6% │
│ エンタテイメント　　 │   163,289 │  3.8% │
│ エンターティメント　 │    38,093 │  0.9% │ - add, sk (meikyo: 「エンターティメント」は誤り。)
│ エンターテーメント　 │    11,813 │  0.3% │ - add, sk
│ エンターティンメント │     6,117 │  0.1% │ - add, sk
│ エンタティメント　　 │     4,310 │  0.1% │ - add, sk
│ エンタティンメント　 │     1,938 │  0.0% │
│ エンタテーメント　　 │     1,534 │  0.0% │
│ エンターテメント　　 │       423 │  0.0% │
│ エンターテンメント　 │       273 │  0.0% │
│ エンタテンメント　　 │       159 │  0.0% │
│ エンタテメント　　　 │        63 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーーーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

Reordering

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<reb>エンターテイメント</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -6,0 +10,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エンタテインメント</reb>
@@ -13 +19,2 @@
-<reb>エンターテイメント</reb>
+<reb>エンターティメント</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -16 +23,10 @@
-<reb>エンタテインメント</reb>
+<reb>エンターテーメント</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エンターティンメント</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エンタティメント</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

daijs; JEs

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
@@ -15 +14,17 @@
-<gloss>clock register</gloss>
+<gloss>time switch</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>stopwatch</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>time keeper</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2071500">セルフタイマー</xref>
+<field>&photo;</field>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>self-timer</gloss>
+<gloss>(delay) timer</gloss>

Moving it above morning dress.

@@ -14,7 +13,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1134670">モーニングコート</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>morning dress</gloss>
-<gloss>morning coat</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -25,0 +19,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1134670">モーニングコート</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>morning dress</gloss>
+<gloss>morning coat</gloss>

I'd prefer to lead with the straight gairaigo rather than an abbreviation. That's what all the JEs do.

I think the breakfast sense should come first. See Google Images.

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/a221e38e7e523ee4955e79f10b39292c46f12ffe
イギリス王室を離脱したヘンリー王子は、6日、父のチャールズ国王の戴冠式に、軍服の着用が認められず、モーニング姿で出席しました。

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>morning dress</gloss>
@@ -22 +22,0 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>

I agree.

I don't think it's much use.圏 is a common suffix.

極地	81734	40.4%
極地圏	284	0.1%

北極圏	102432	50.6%
南極圏	5109	2.5%
極域	9344	4.6%
南極地方	1114	0.6%
北極地方	2282	1.1%

Maybe coined by extension(北極圏, 南極圏)?  Seems almost like a mistake, or redundancy, to have 地圏 "polar place region". 
The only other "地圏" entry is for "geosphere", "the region of the earth consisting of all of its 地".

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1240390">極地・1</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

genius

Some refs have the literal "brown rice tea".

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>tea (with roasted rice)</gloss>
+<gloss>green tea with roasted brown rice</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/srch/jn/創世期/m0u/
創世期	6930

This refers usually to "the Creation". It needs to be a solo entry. The kanji form may be suitable as an sK form in other そうせいき entries but that's another matter.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>time of creation</gloss>
+<gloss>time of the creation</gloss>
+<gloss>beginning of the world</gloss>

(Note: this isn't even considering *this* term. 誤変換, wrong kanji usage)
創成期と創世記 
https://salon.mainichi-kotoba.jp/archives/124252

Eijiro knows:
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=創世期
創世期
the early days（ある時代の）
創世期に
in the early days（ある時代の）

Recommend merging with 創成期(see comments there). They shouldn't mean the same thing (創世 = creation of the world), but in practice it appears that they do. 

To the extent that 創世期 sometimes means "the period of the creation of the world", this is just A+B, and context will sort that out (you can stick 期 to anything).

Fork

Judging from the examples in the kokugos, 櫓(ろ) and 櫂(かい) are more likely to be used with 漕ぐ when describing the literal act of rowing.

smk:    「舟を━〔=居眠りして、からだが前後左右に傾き、また元にもどったりする〕」
iwakoku:「舟を―」（からだを前後にゆらして、いねむりする意にも）
daijir:  慣用： 舟を━

Usages of 舟を漕ぐ are almost always going to be figurative, so I don't think it makes to have this cross reference here

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2267490">舟を漕ぐ・2</xref>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2267490">舟を漕ぐ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2267490">舟を漕ぐ・2</xref>

N-grams, examples in most JEs.

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2267490">舟を漕ぐ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2267490">舟を漕ぐ・1</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

daij, meikyo, chujiten

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>to paddle</gloss>
@@ -18 +19 @@
-<gloss>to paddle</gloss>
+<gloss>to pull (the oars)</gloss>
@@ -23 +24 @@
-<gloss>to pedal (e.g. bicycle)</gloss>
+<gloss>to pedal (a bicycle, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -33 +34 @@
-<gloss>to operate a hand pump</gloss>
+<gloss>to work (a hand pump)</gloss>
@@ -38 +39 @@
-<gloss>to push through (deep snow, the jungle, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to push through (a thicket, deep snow, etc.)</gloss>

Yes, not much use.

The xref doesn't seem useful to me.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2267490">舟を漕ぐ・2</xref>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2267490">舟を漕ぐ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2267490">舟を漕ぐ・2</xref>

[rare] can be used for a single sense but in most cases another tag is more appropriate. I think this sense is either [dated] or [obs]. GG5 has it but daijs's example is from 1877.
I don't think the 退学処分 x-ref is needed. It's not interchangeable with 退学.

@@ -27 +26,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1779190">退学処分</xref>

[rare] is more for the whole entry.

@@ -35,2 +35,2 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>
-<gloss>leaving school (university, etc.) after completing a course of study</gloss>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
+<gloss>leaving school (university, etc.) after completing a course</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/退学

退学	280974	92.8%
退学処分	21756	7.2%

退学 alone　is predominantly [1]
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/退学

*lots* of glosses and circumstances, none of them are [3].
「退学」は英語で何という？退学方法で変わる表現を確認しよう！
https://nativecamp.net/blog/20230510-leave_school

eijiro has two pages of collocations, none look like [3]
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=退学

処分 = "punishment" nuance here,I think. it is the example in sankoku's 退学 entry. On reverso, 退学 is predominantly [1], 退学処分 is unambiguous.

sankoku does not give [3] at all, says explicitly 途中でやめ. Wikipedia also says 卒業・修了を待たずに学校を途中でやめること

[3] seems like it would be an uncommon usage, given the nuance involved in [1] and [2]. Also, dropped from modern dictionary (sankoku). It's obviously literally correct for A+B reasons, 退+学, but unlikely to be common in this day and age. (marking [rare] or [hist] or [dated] explains that 退学 is not as ambiguous as the 3 senses might otherwise indicate).

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1779190">退学処分</xref>
@@ -34 +35,2 @@
-<gloss>leaving school (university, etc.) after completing a course</gloss>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>leaving school (university, etc.) after completing a course of study</gloss>

meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -20 +21 @@
-<gloss>withdrawing from school</gloss>
+<gloss>withdrawal from school</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +26 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -30,0 +33 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

If possible I try and link a different sentence. In this case there isn't one.
This may as well be delinked.

I've noticed there are quite a few entries (including this one) in which the linked example sentence is also a cross reference within the entry.
Should the sentence be de-linked for cases like this?

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2138600">百聞は一見にしかず・ひゃくぶんはいっけんにしかず</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2138600">百聞は一見にしかず</xref>

I don't think it's needed.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>hearing a hundred times</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2138600">百聞は一見にしかず・ひゃくぶんはいっけんにしかず</xref>

[lit]?

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>hearing many times</gloss>

Quiet. Closing.

It's a good point and a note may be useful.

@@ -33,0 +34 @@
+<s_inf>often spoken as ふいんき</s_inf>

「雰囲気」←「ふいんき」と読む時代が来る？　大学教授が指摘　「ありえる。すでに『無観客』という言葉が…」
https://jocr.jp/raditopi/2021/07/18/360380/?detail-page=1

ふんいき vs ふいーき 雰囲気 Japanese pronunciation
(summary: Japanese woman acts like "ふんいき" is the "proper" pronunciation, then finds that she actually says ふいーき when speaking naturally)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saidi3VDt2w


ふんいき	26723	32.5%　
ふいんき	55396	67.4% <-- this is an absurdly high occurrence as a *written* "mistake"
ふいーき	42	0.1%

sankoku: ふいんき「雰囲気」　「ふんいき」のあやまり
and, under the proper 雰囲気 entry: "「ふいんき」はあやまり"

Any chance of a [note], something like 
[note: "often pronounced ふいんき in spoken form"] under [1]?

Such a note might be an exception here, but this term is actually exceptional.  The term may be *the* example of a word-in-transformation in Japanese.

I was *taught* to say "hwinki", in Japan, in a Japanese classroom, by a late-20s/early-30s Japanese teacher.  The impression was that your speech would sound a bit stilted if you tried to say huniki. (perhaps like "whatcha doin?"/ "what are you doing")

Even for search-only forms, if the counts are <1000 and <0.1%, it's probably not worth adding. No harm in having it but I wouldn't have bothered with ふいん気.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────────┬───────╮
│ 雰囲気　 │ 23,206,360 │ 99.6% │
│ ふんい気 │      1,549 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ ふん囲気 │      1,259 │  0.0% │ - sK
│ ふいん気 │        500 │  0.0% │ - adding
│ ふんいき │     26,723 │  0.1% │
│ ふいんき │     55,396 │  0.2% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ふいん気</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24 +29,0 @@
-<re_restr>雰囲気</re_restr>

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<field>&gardn;</field>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_nokanji/>

ボカシ	84306	18.1%
ぼかし	382264	81.9%


Is this an [adj-no], [adj-f], or should the verb be used... unclear.  The verb seems preferable
ぼかした写真	1660	81.2%
ぼかし写真	176	8.6%
ぼかしの写真	209	10.2%


"Blurred edition" of an illustration:
https://ichi-up.net/2018/084
ぼかし編

Heavily "blur", then "blurring"
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/ぼかし
blur: 327
blurring: 49
gradient: 7 
gradation: 7
shading off: 7 (includes some false-positives)
shading off: 0
Example translation:
ぼかしが多く、はっきりしたものがない。 -> A lot of blurring, nothing defined.

ぼかしツール	1447　blur tool (image editor)
ぼかし効果	1447  blur effect
ぼかし柄	1126 blur pattern (clothing)

The photoshop "blur tool"
https://digitor.jp/textbook/photoshop-blur-tool/
Photoshopのぼかしツールを使って被写体をボカす簡単な方法

https://www.sophia-it.com/content/顔ぼかし
顔ぼかし
読み方：かおぼかし
別名：フェイスブラーリング
【英】face blurring

On "shading":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokashi_(printing)
Itabokashi, or 'block shading,' is a technique used to produce ruffled edges on areas of color. 

More Basics of Gradation Printing ('Bokashi')
http://woodblock.com/encyclopedia/entries/012_03/012_03.html
Bokashi (gradations or blending)
...
O-bokashi (wide gradation) is a gradual shading over a wide area. To achieve this, the technique of the standard bokashi is repeated a number of times, each time narrowing the space to be shaded.

Clothing:
https://einz.jp/products/uton-bokashi-color-matching-gradient-off-shoulder-knit?variant=42378465607860
Uton Bokashi color matching gradient off-shoulder knit

Image search for "ぼかし" is a lot of blurred stuff. 

Note: ぼかし袴 returns images of hakama with a clear gradient effect. 

"bokashi", somewhat like "bokeh", seems to have been imported into English in some circles, both as a composting technique and as an art style. If I had a nickel for every website that said:
    Bokashi (ぼかし) is Japanese for "shading off" or "gradation."
I'd have a lot of nickels. Usually these are sites about composting.

Most of  the terms in one reverso match:
2ぼかし量を変更する　グラデーション領域内のぼかし（グラデーション）の幅を調節できます。
To change the amount of blur You can adjust the width of the blur (gradient) of the gradation in the area.

========== Note: [1] and [2] may be of no real relation: 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokashi_(horticulture)
Nomenclature
The name bokashi is transliterated from spoken Japanese (ぼかし). However, Japanese-English dictionaries give the word an older artistic meaning: "shading or gradation" of images – especially applied to woodblock prints.[1][2] This later extended to mean pixellation or fogging in censored photographs. Therefore, its application to fermented organic matter is of uncertain origin; if both uses are related, unifying concepts may be "alteration" or "fading away".

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ボカシ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -13 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>shading off</gloss>
+<gloss>blurring (e.g. of an image)</gloss>
+<gloss>blur</gloss>
+<gloss>gradient</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>shading</gloss>

Done.

I'll approve and reopen. I need to reindex a sentence when tatoeba is back.

daij, meikyo, gg5, prog, luminous

Splitting sense 1.
らんる only has the first two meanings. It's also marked as〔文〕in meikyo and sankoku. I'll split it out into a separate entry.
We wouldn't usually put adj-f and adj-na together but I think it's appropriate here. Daijr has a 形動 sense but it typically appears directly before the noun. Sankoku has a "造語成分" sense for this usage.
We don't typically use the gikun tag when the entry only has one reading but maybe we should. This is a discussion for GitHub but it might be better if [gikun] went on the kanji, not the reading, so that we're more like the kokugos. We would no longer be able to merge gikun/jukujikun readings with other readings but I think I prefer that approach.

@@ -12,3 +11,0 @@
-<reb>らんる</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -20 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&pref;</pos>
@@ -23,2 +19 @@
-<gloss>scrap</gloss>
-<gloss>tattered clothes</gloss>
+<gloss>old cloth</gloss>
@@ -28 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&pref;</pos>
@@ -30,2 +24,3 @@
-<gloss>fault (esp. in a pretense, pretence)</gloss>
-<gloss>defect</gloss>
+<gloss>tattered clothes</gloss>
+<gloss>ragged clothes</gloss>
+<gloss>rags</gloss>
@@ -33,0 +29,8 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>fault (one is trying to hide)</gloss>
+<gloss>defect</gloss>
+<gloss>weakness</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -35,0 +39 @@
+<gloss>worn-out</gloss>
@@ -38 +42,2 @@
-<gloss>junky</gloss>
+<gloss>ragged</gloss>
+<gloss>tattered</gloss>

daij, koj, gg5, prog, wisdom

I don't think sense 2 is that dated. Or, at least, it's not as dated as sense 3. It's in all the JEs (GG5 leads with it) and none of the other kokugos describe it as 古風, including the most recent edition of meikyo.
I think the archaic sense can be dropped.
Added kanji form.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>真</keb>
@@ -18,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>fact</gloss>
@@ -22 +25,0 @@
-<misc>&dated;</misc>
@@ -25,2 +28,2 @@
-<gloss>integrity</gloss>
-<gloss>fidelity</gloss>
+<gloss>faithfulness</gloss>
+<gloss>good faith</gloss>
@@ -38,6 +40,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&int;</pos>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<s_inf>used when recalling forgotten information, suddenly changing the subject, etc.</s_inf>
-<gloss>that's right</gloss>

Dropping the [adv] tags from the first two senses, which are only tagged as nouns in the kokugos. Sankoku describes sense [2] as 古風.

Adding a new adverbial sense from the kokugos. Shinmeikai defines it as "「まことに」の省略表現。" and Sankoku says it's also 古風. I'm copying our glosses from entries 2820720 (じつに) and 1381160 (まことに).

Changing the final sense from [adv,n] to [int]. It's not in the smaller kokugos and daijirin has it tagged as '感'

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -22 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -23,0 +22 @@
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
@@ -31 +30,11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
+<gloss>indeed</gloss>
+<gloss>really</gloss>
+<gloss>absolutely</gloss>
+<gloss>truly</gloss>
+<gloss>actually</gloss>
+<gloss>very</gloss>
+<gloss>quite</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>

@@ -33 +33,2 @@
-<gloss>that's right (used when recalling forgotten information, suddenly changing the subject, etc.)</gloss>
+<s_inf>used when recalling forgotten information, suddenly changing the subject, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>that's right</gloss>

OK

@@ -61 +61 @@
-<s_inf>as 終わって(い)る</s_inf>
+<s_inf>as 終わって(い)る or 終わった</s_inf>

That example was from sankoku: もう終わった選手
Daijisen also has a note on the corresponding sense: 「終わった」「終わっている」の形で

We could change the sense note to "as 終わって(い)る or 終わった"

Stephen quoted an "終わった" example also (from daijs?)

It's not prenominal.
The note shows that it appears in a particular form.

@@ -58 +58,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -60,2 +61,2 @@
-<s_inf>usu. as 終わって(い)る</s_inf>
-<gloss>past one's prime (both of people and things)</gloss>
+<s_inf>as 終わって(い)る</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be past its (one's) prime</gloss>
@@ -65 +66 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -66,0 +68,3 @@
+<s_inf>as 終わって(い)る</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be awful</gloss>
+<gloss>to be terrible</gloss>

Senses moved from 2851536, See discussion there.
I made the "past one's prime" sense non-inflecting, but that could be reviewed.

@@ -56,0 +57,13 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<s_inf>usu. as 終わって(い)る</s_inf>
+<gloss>past one's prime (both of people and things)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>to suck</gloss>
+<gloss>to be hopeless</gloss>
+</sense>

"ichi2" used not to rate a P in the edict edition. For years I've changed ichi1 to ichi2 when the term or form was obviously uncommon. There are about 100 of them.
The old ichi/news/spec tagging is a mess, and sorely needs revising.

I'm not sure what the reason for the downgrade is. We don't usually amend/drop (non-spec) freq tags unless there's an obvious error in the data. They're not based on Google n-grams. Plenty of ichi1-tagged terms have fewer n-grams than this. 
This doesn't meet the spec1/spec2 threshold.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>ichi2</ke_pri>
@@ -8 +8,0 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi2</ke_pri>
@@ -20 +18,0 @@
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Downgrade. It's still in the ichiman collection.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<ke_pri>spec2</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -13 +13 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>ichi2</ke_pri>
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>ichi2</re_pri>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<re_pri>spec2</re_pri>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

gg5
Glossing as an adjective

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 煩忙　　 │     351 │  0.1% │ - rK (kokugos)
│ 繁忙　　 │ 325,820 │ 99.8% │
│ はんぼう │     453 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 繁忙　　 │ 325,820 │
│ 繁忙の　 │   4,164 │
│ 繁忙に　 │   3,190 │
│ 繁忙な　 │   2,730 │
│ 繁忙を　 │   2,124 │
│ 繁忙と　 │     744 │
│ 繁忙が　 │     513 │
│ 繁忙さ　 │     465 │
│ 繁忙は　 │     216 │
│ 繁忙して │      73 │
│ 繁忙する │      54 │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────╯

I suppose the [ichi1] tag should be downgraded to [ichi2] or removed altogether

@@ -4,4 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>煩忙</keb>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +9,5 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>煩忙</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -24 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>pressure of business</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +26,3 @@
+<gloss>high-stress</gloss>
+<gloss>hectic</gloss>
+<gloss>pressed (with business)</gloss>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<re_pri>spec2</re_pri>

Indeed

gg5, jwiki

Definitely not "medical college".

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>medical college</gloss>
+<gloss>medical science</gloss>

Several dictionaries: "the presence of glucose in the blood". The key word is *presence*. It's not the level (値).

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/glycemia

I'm absolutely not an expert on the subject, but all the search results I'm seeing on google say that glycemia is just another word for blood sugar concentration.

Glycemia is the ailment. I think Wikipedia is wrong. I've proposed an entry for 血糖症.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>glycemia</gloss>

gg5, wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_sugar_level

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>blood glucose level</gloss>
+<gloss>glycemia</gloss>

I don't think that xref helps.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2417360">喉元過ぎれば熱さを忘れる</xref>

daijr

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2417360">喉元過ぎれば熱さを忘れる</xref>
@@ -15,0 +17,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>important part</gloss>

G n-grams:
喉元	90470
のど元	16901
のどもと	 8189

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>のど元</keb>

One x-ref is sufficient.

@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2777450">退校処分</xref>

Relatively rare.

退学	280974	97.1%
退校	8282	2.9%

退学処分	21756	96.9%
退校処分	700	3.1%

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=退校
退校を含む検索結果一覧
退校処分になる
be expelled from school

sankoku: 退校：退学。(that's it). daijs entry also looks just like the entry for 退学(and includes 退学).

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1411340">退学・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1411340">退学・1</xref>
+<gloss>dropping out of school</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +18,8 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1411340">退学・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1411340">退学・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2777450">退校処分</xref>
@@ -15,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>dismissal</gloss>

gg5, daij, meikyo

@@ -14,2 +14,9 @@
-<gloss>leaving school</gloss>
-<gloss>expulsion (from school)</gloss>
+<gloss>withdrawal from school</gloss>
+<gloss>expulsion from school</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1184920">下校</xref>
+<gloss>leaving school (at the end of the day)</gloss>

Closing.

I don't mind if this one goes.
Jisho.org has an issue with deletions. I generate a daily list of deleted entries and Kim periodically does a cull. He's working on an NG version which won't have this problem.

I don't disagree with that in principle, but I want to note that
at least one app which updates daily does not remove entries
that get deleted in JMdict. 勁卒 is still visible at jisho.org
even though its entry for ＪＭｄｉｃｔ says it's using the
2023-10-10 data.

It might not be a bad idea to allow these apps to update the
entries with [arch] tags before we delete them.

If it's only in kanwa dictionaries, it can go.

gg5, chujiten, koj
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/sound-truck
街宣車	        60,754
街頭宣伝車	1,282

I don't think an abbr tag is necessary. The kokugos only have 街宣車 as a headword.

@@ -16,2 +16,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2748460">街宣</xref>
-<gloss>propaganda truck (van with loudspeakers)</gloss>
+<gloss>sound truck (used for campaigning, advertising or propaganda)</gloss>
+<gloss>loudspeaker van</gloss>
+<gloss>(right-wing) propaganda vehicle</gloss>

I think that's too wordy. It's 街宣+車.

@@ -16,3 +16,2 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>van (equipped with loudspeakers for speeches or music) used for political propaganda (esp. right-wing), election campaigns or commercial advertisement</gloss>
-<gloss>sound truck</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2748460">街宣</xref>
+<gloss>propaganda truck (van with loudspeakers)</gloss>

daijr/s, gg5, koujien

@@ -16 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>(right-wing) propaganda truck</gloss>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>van (equipped with loudspeakers for speeches or music) used for political propaganda (esp. right-wing), election campaigns or commercial advertisement</gloss>
+<gloss>sound truck</gloss>

@@ -20,2 +20 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">idea product</lsource>
-<gloss>novelty</gloss>
+<gloss>novelty product</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_restr>アイデア商品</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アイディアしょうひん</reb>
+<re_restr>アイディア商品</re_restr>

アイデア商品	174391	90.1%
アイディア商品	19196	9.9%

Merging 2859021.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>アイデア商品</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<reb>アイディアしょうひん</reb>
+<reb>アイデアしょうひん</reb>
@@ -13,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>innovative (household) article</gloss>

I did wonder about 誤変換. Surprised it's more common than 変換ミス. GG5 just xrefs to 変換ミス.

We haven't really been doing "synonym xrefs" since the days of Nils.

変換ミス	61169	43.6%
誤変換	79204	56.4%

Just ran into "誤変換" for the first time.  Appreciated the xref(when learning one, good to know about the other). 誤変換 is even more common, but both seem standard.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1271460">誤変換</xref>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

Entry created

I think the note is confusing.

@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-<s_inf>from the movements of rowing</s_inf>

This is our usual formatting.

@@ -26,4 +25,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&v5g;</pos>

I found a couple of pages with the literal meaning so it should be mentioned.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<s_inf>from the undulating movements of someone rowing a boat</s_inf>
+<s_inf>from the movements of rowing</s_inf>
@@ -25,0 +26,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v5g;</pos>
+<gloss g_type="lit">to row a boat</gloss>

sankoku, daijr/s, meikyou, senkoku, koujien

the expression doesn't really seem to be used literally and kokugos only mention it to explain the figurative meaning

@@ -22,6 +22,3 @@
-<gloss>to row a boat</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<pos>&v5g;</pos>
-<gloss>to nod off</gloss>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<s_inf>from the undulating movements of someone rowing a boat</s_inf>
+<gloss>to nod off (while sitting)</gloss>

gg5

"glucopenia" isn't in my refs.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<field>&med;</field>
+<gloss>hypoglycemia</gloss>
@@ -14,2 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>hypoglycemia</gloss>
-<gloss>glucopenia</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>hypoglycaemia</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

Entry created

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

koj, eij

好日【こうにち】 isn't recorded in the usual refs.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/日日是好日
Wikipedia has the reading but qualifies it like this:
  日本語の禅語としては「・・・こうにち」と読むのが正しいとされるが、・・・

Probably safe to tag it as irregular

@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>日日これ好日</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,3 +21,0 @@
-<reb>にちにちこれこうにち</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -22,0 +25,4 @@
+<reb>にちにちこれこうにち</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -23,0 +30 @@
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

https://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/日日是好日

日日是好日	16455	12.8%
日々是好日	103480	80.3%
日々これ好日	8663	6.7%
日日これ好日	295	0.2%

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>日々これ好日</keb>
@@ -25,0 +29 @@
+<gloss>enjoy every day</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/日日是好日

I think a literal translation works best here.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>日々是好日</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +14,3 @@
+<reb>にちにちこれこうにち</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +18,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ひびこれこうにち</reb>
@@ -15 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>everyday will continue to be a peaceful and happy day</gloss>
+<misc>&proverb;</misc>
+<gloss>every day is a good day</gloss>

If we're keeping the 創世期 entry, I think 創世期 needs to be visible here as well. iK is probably best.
I don't think the examples are needed.

@@ -21,2 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>early days (e.g. of a company)</gloss>
-<gloss>early years (e.g. of an industry)</gloss>
+<gloss>early days</gloss>
+<gloss>early years</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=創世期
創世期に
in the early days（ある時代の）

An example: a musician who supported death metal in its formative years:
デス・メタル・シーン創世期を支えた重鎮バンド OBITUARY
https://gekirock.com/news/2018/03/obituary_live_video.php

創成期	24689	52.7%
創生期	15270	32.6%
創世期	6930	14.8%


"創世期" site:twitter.com
* A社の創世期について詳しく話を聞いた ...
* #TomsRacing の創世期を支えたレーシングカーKP47 ...
* 一人目は、創世期から奈良クラブを支え、...
* 日本SF創世期にこんな書き手がいたとは

twitter googits:
創成期 ~3000
創生期 ~550 ("did you mean "創世記"?)
創世期 ~220
the book of Genesis
創世記 ~ 5,860

Note: 創世記 is used in a trendy way as just "Genesis", without appearing to refer to the Biblical text.

I didn't realize eijiro had "early days" on 創世期 as well. A search for:
site:mainichi.jp "創世期"
gives 5 hits, all used like 創成期 or 創生期. For example, one is on the establishment of the Rolex watch company.
(創成期 gives >100 actual results, 創生期 13 actual results)

[iK] or [sK], I don't get the vibe that it's a good practice to use 創世期, in spite of the ngram occurrence. A lot of potential confusion with 創成期；創生期 ad 創世・創世記（the creation of the world/the Book of Genesis）.  But then again, perhaps it's not confusion, but deliberate.

Maybe we can't [iK] though... I leave it to you

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>創世期</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

創成期	24689	13.9%
創生期	15270	8.6%
# Possibly a giant mistake...
創世期	6930	3.9%
# Genesis (bible)
創世記	130434	73.6%

https://www.weblio.jp/content/創生期
創生期
読み方：そうせいき
物事が初めて生じた時期。当初。「成立」に焦点を置く場合は「創成期」の表記も用いられる。

This is the example given in weblio, a wikipedia section header identifying the initial stage of adult video games:
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アダルトゲーム
創生期（1980年代） <-- the 1980s "early period" seems like a fine gloss. 

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=創成期
会社の創成期に
during the company's early days

実用日本語表現辞典 puts 創成期 as a variant of 創生期, with a nuance of "founding".  創成期 wins on ngrams, probably because things get founded more than created randomly.  But 創生期 may actually be more general.

"early days" popped up in eijiro (the only gloss it has, on 創成期).  This formulation also shows up in reverso here-and-there, and seems like a pretty natural equivalent to me.  Also clarifies the nuance of the whole term.

As you might imagine, the glosses for 創生期 are more "creation"-heavy...  These kanji are not completely interchangeable, but I don't  know if we want *4* entries for そうせいき

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>創生期</keb>
@@ -13,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>early days (e.g. of a company)</gloss>
+<gloss>early years (e.g. of an industry)</gloss>

gg5

プログレッシブ和英中辞典: https://kotobank.jp/jeword/創成
研究社新英和中辞典: ((in)) the early period; ((in)) the initial stage.

gloss different from 創成, so probably worth a new entry

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&proverb;</misc>

Quiet

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q12177806807

Proverb? Not sure this makes it as an entry but it appears in quite a lot of web pages.

@@ -11,2 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>every man, regardless of birth, has the chance to become someone with great power if he exerts himself</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>high status does not depend on birth</gloss>
+<gloss>every man can achieve great power if he exerts himself</gloss>

wiktionary nikk
王侯将相いずくんぞ	1878	 
fom the Chinese 
王侯將相寧有種乎

Closing.

Plenty of web hits. Maybe this works. Don't need the literal translation.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>breast tent (clothing drawn with protruding breasts pulling the fabric of a shirt, esp. one tucked in)</gloss>
+<misc>&m-sl;</misc>
+<gloss>tight shirt, etc. over protruding breasts</gloss>

https://webronza.asahi.com/national/articles/2019111500004.html

If it was compositional, you'd be able to figure out what it was without the explanation in parenthesis, but "breast tent" on its own doesn't make sense. We already have 乳袋, which is in デジタル大辞泉.

A+B, no evidence provided of it being used widely enough.

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/乳テント

乳袋: breast pouch (clothing drawn as form-fitting, cupping the breasts)

乳カーテン: breast curtain (clothing drawn as hanging over the breasts, esp. with an untucked shirt)

Given how rare the expression is, I don't think it's necessary.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

May as well have them both visible.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

daijr/s & koj display the 言えば form
山といえば川	145

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>山といえば川</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

山と言えば川	133

https://kotobank.jp/word/山と言えば川-649050

Trimming.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>a parent's love for their chd is greater than a child's love for its parents</gloss>
+<gloss>a parent's love is greater than a child's love for its parents</gloss>

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>parental love is greater than the love of a child for its parents</gloss>
+<gloss>a parent's love for their chd is greater than a child's love for its parents</gloss>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&proverb;</misc>

親思う心にまさる親心	501	    
親思う心に勝る親心	396	    
親思う心にまさる親ごころ	20	  
ルミナス

@@ -5,0 +6,7 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>親思う心に勝る親心</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>親思う心にまさる親ごころ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12 +19 @@
-<gloss>heart of the parent who thinks of the child is deeper than the child thinks of the parent</gloss>
+<gloss>parental love is greater than the love of a child for its parents</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/親思う心にまさる親心-454978

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/glycemia

I agree with Stephen. It seems that "glycemia" is sometimes used as a shorthand for "hyperglycemia" but the same can't be said for 血糖症.

I tried searching google for some real usages of "血糖症" and only found machine-translated papers.

https://jglobal.jst.go.jp/detail?JGLOBAL_ID=200902189209202953
  2型糖尿病の大血管性及び微小血管性合併症と血糖症の関連(UKPDS 35):前向き観察研究
  Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes(UKPDS 35): Prospective observational study.

https://jglobal.jst.go.jp/detail?JGLOBAL_ID=201102223707958773
  脳卒中転帰に対する入院後の血糖症の影響:より良好な生存に関連するブドウ糖正常化
  The impact of postadmission glycemia on stroke outcome: Glucose normalisation is associated with better survival

https://bibgraph.hpcr.jp/abst/pubmed/19336679?click_by=p_ref
  12人の正常血糖症の個人では、
  In 12 normoglycemic individuals,

https://bibgraph.hpcr.jp/abst/pubmed/21423183?click_by=p_ref
  2,422人の正常血糖症の人のうち、
  Among 2,422 normoglycemic individuals (...)

None of these papers were written by Japanese authors and the English text appears to be machine translated. The hpcr.jp links have "translated by Google" icons at the bottom of the pages.

The "Life Sciences/Bio-Med" dictionary on WWWJDIC returns "血糖正常" and "正常血糖" for "normoglycemic," not "正常血糖症" as used in the links above.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 　血糖症状 │ 6,410 │ 50.0% │
│ 低血糖症状 │ 5,949 │ 46.4% │
│ 高血糖症状 │   457 │  3.6% │
│ 過血糖症状 │     0 │  0.0% │
├─ーーーーー─┼───────┼───────┤
│ 　血糖症の │ 3,648 │ 50.0% │
│ 低血糖症の │ 3,454 │ 47.4% │
│ 高血糖症の │   112 │  1.5% │
│ 過血糖症の │    75 │  1.0% │
├─ーーーーー─┼───────┼───────┤
│ 　血糖症を │ 1,993 │ 50.0% │
│ 低血糖症を │ 1,895 │ 47.6% │
│ 高血糖症を │    95 │  2.4% │
│ 過血糖症を │     0 │  0.0% │
├─ーーーーー─┼───────┼───────┤
│ 　血糖症が │   970 │ 50.0% │
│ 低血糖症が │   849 │ 43.8% │
│ 高血糖症が │   120 │  6.2% │
│ 過血糖症が │     0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

The counts for 血糖症 are always almost exactly equal to the sum of the 〈高／低／過〉 prefixed counts.
It looks like the counts for 血糖症 are all false positives.

I get the impression that the J-Es incorrectly extrapolated from "低血糖症 = hypoglycemia" to "低 = hypo, 血糖症 = glycemia"

低血糖症	20569
血糖症	22455
RP and 理化学英和辞典 have it too.

The parse for 低血糖症 is 低+血糖+症.
I'm seeing a reasonable number of www pages with it in the context of ailments/conditions.

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/glycemia
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/glycemia

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───╮
│ は血糖症　 │ 0 │
│ が血糖症　 │ 0 │
│ な血糖症　 │ 0 │
│ の血糖症　 │ 0 │
│ に血糖症　 │ 0 │
│ を血糖症　 │ 0 │
│ する血糖症 │ 0 │
│ と血糖症　 │ 0 │
│ や血糖症　 │ 0 │
│ で血糖症　 │ 0 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───╯

It doesn't look like the word glycemia refers to an ailment (症).

As for 血糖症, I'm not sure that it's used as a word by itself. It seems like the n-gram counts are probably from 高血糖症, 低血糖症, etc.

gg5, RP, jwiki
高血糖症	1,744		
高血糖	76,902

ガス漏れ警報器	5961	90.1%
ガス漏れ感知器	294	4.4%
ガス感知器	364	5.5%　← my mansion uses this word for these

more commonly as xref

http://www.kouso-sora.com/酵素風呂とは/

You're welcome.

酵素風呂	38587

Thanks. I'll set up a merger.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ アイデア商品　 │ 174,391 │ 90.1% │
│ アイディア商品 │  19,196 │  9.9% │ - already an entry (1958580)
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

アイデア商品	174391

Not sure how to gloss

Not always household goods I don't think.

* daijs: https://kotobank.jp/word/セキュリティーコード-1691641
* KOD

セキュリティーコード 4,802

daijr: 将軍と宰相。
saito: 〈名〉Generals and prime ministers; the highest offices of the land

I don't think it has a non-literal meaning outside of compounds and idiomatic expressions.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>persons of status and rank</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="lit">general and prime minister</gloss>
+<gloss>generals and prime ministers</gloss>

Koj, daijr/s, etc. 将軍と宰相。
将相	2801

Cropped up in the proposed 王侯将相いずくんぞ種あらんや entry. May be useful.

Certainly getting a lot of use.

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/fe9173f8ff5569257b70cd9c8947faeaed9590fd
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20231013/k00/00m/040/046000c
https://news.biglobe.ne.jp/list/056/555/迷惑動画.html
https://www.nhk.or.jp/gogaku/gendaieigo/detail/index.html?no=20230628 NHK translates it as "prank video".

Newer term

Evacuation:
https://agora-web.jp/archives/2044271.html
Aid:
https://www.arabnews.jp/article/saudi-arabia/article_92542/
https://www.bbc.com/japanese/60065259

This doesn't appear to refer to search and rescue aircraft. The link Nicolas posted is about evacuating Brazilian citizens from Israel.
Not particularly common.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>search and rescue aircraft</gloss>
+<gloss>rescue plane</gloss>
+<gloss>evacuation plane</gloss>
+<gloss>humanitarian aid aircraft</gloss>

Eijiro

救難機 is in GG5 too. I'll add it.

https://www.brasilnippou.com/2023/231012-13rasil.html

救援機	2115	55.9%
救難機	1667	44.1% (Wikipedia uses this version, might be worth an entry as well)

gg5, prog

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>rescue plane</gloss>

救難機	1667
GG5

Split from 1572500.

daij, koj, sankoku, smk

wiki

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カリド</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8 +11,2 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&surname;</misc>
+<misc>&male;</misc>