None of the JEs nor meikyo/iwanami/NHK漢字表記辞典 have any kanji for this. Instead, they have 「和やか」 for 「なごやか」.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

daijr, koj

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>和やか</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>柔やか</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

gg5, prog, ウィズダム和英辞典, daij, koj

Not a noun.
Added glosses.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -11,0 +11,4 @@
+<gloss>beaming</gloss>
+<gloss>radiant</gloss>
+<gloss>bright</gloss>
+<gloss>cheerful</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/エンターテインメント

I think エンターテインメント should lead. More refs have it as a headword. It's the form NHK uses. N-gram counts are similar.

@@ -4,0 +5,4 @@
+<reb>エンターテインメント</reb>
+<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -7,4 +10,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>エンターテインメント</reb>
-<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>

!!

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

エンタ（ー）テ（イ／ィ／ー）（ン）メント

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ エンターテイメント　 │ 1,943,149 │ 45.6% │ - (meikyo, shinsen, obunsha)
│ エンターテインメント │ 1,767,388 │ 41.4% │ - (daijr/s, koj, smk, sankoku, gg5, etc.)
│ エンタテインメント　 │   325,767 │  7.6% │
│ エンタテイメント　　 │   163,289 │  3.8% │
│ エンターティメント　 │    38,093 │  0.9% │ - add, sk (meikyo: 「エンターティメント」は誤り。)
│ エンターテーメント　 │    11,813 │  0.3% │ - add, sk
│ エンターティンメント │     6,117 │  0.1% │ - add, sk
│ エンタティメント　　 │     4,310 │  0.1% │ - add, sk
│ エンタティンメント　 │     1,938 │  0.0% │
│ エンタテーメント　　 │     1,534 │  0.0% │
│ エンターテメント　　 │       423 │  0.0% │
│ エンターテンメント　 │       273 │  0.0% │
│ エンタテンメント　　 │       159 │  0.0% │
│ エンタテメント　　　 │        63 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーーーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

Reordering

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<reb>エンターテイメント</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -6,0 +10,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エンタテインメント</reb>
@@ -13 +19,2 @@
-<reb>エンターテイメント</reb>
+<reb>エンターティメント</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -16 +23,10 @@
-<reb>エンタテインメント</reb>
+<reb>エンターテーメント</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エンターティンメント</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>エンタティメント</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Agree.

mk (特に中年男性が)
nikk 男性が、

I don't mind "attraction" over "obsession" or "prebubescent" over "young" but I'm not seeing the point of adding rare words like "gynephilic" to secondary glosses (as this meaning is already obvious from the second gloss). It's true a woman could flippantly call herself a "lolicon" despite not being a man but that's true for a lot of gendered language/words and without qualifiers, I don't think anybody would ever assume this word refers to anything but a man.

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>(esp. male) gynephilic pedophile</gloss>
-<gloss>(esp. male) gynephilic pedophilia</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>

senkoku, daijr, iwanami

sexual obsession doesn't make much sense, kokugos tend to use 性愛の対象 which is closer to sexual attraction 
using "young girls" (or "very young girls" by gg5) seems pretty euphemistic, kokugos do use 少女 which is ambiguous but nobody would use ロリコン for someone attracted to a 17yo girl. + they often do add 幼女 to be more clear, so prepubescent is a better rendering in my opinion.
"gynephilic" (or a synonym) is needed because "pedophile" alone implies that ロリコン could be someone sexually attracted to prepubescent boys as well which is not the case.
i guess "esp. male" is the most controversial change. i think this image of ロリコン is due to the male-dominated otaku culture (and most pedophiles being male). it's fair to include it, but it doesn't seem *necessary* to be a ロリコン which is probably why many kokugos don't mention it all.

Given the extensive discussion last year about edits to this entry, I think case should be made for these proposed changes. Justification for the inclusion of gynephilic is needed.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1148090">ロリータコンプレックス</xref>
@@ -14,3 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>sexual obsession with young girls</gloss>
-<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>
-<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>
+<gloss>sexual attraction to prepubescent girls</gloss>
+<gloss>(esp. male) gynephilic pedophile</gloss>
+<gloss>(esp. male) gynephilic pedophilia</gloss>

gg5, prog

I don't think the x-refs on sense 1 are needed.

@@ -12,4 +12,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1168600">咽頭</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1277370">喉頭</xref>
-<gloss>{med} throat</gloss>
+<field>&anat;</field>
+<gloss>throat</gloss>
@@ -20 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>{form} vital passage</gloss>
+<gloss>vital passage</gloss>
+<gloss>key position</gloss>

sankoku, daijr/s, gg5

@@ -13 +13,8 @@
-<gloss>throat</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1168600">咽頭</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1277370">喉頭</xref>
+<gloss>{med} throat</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2859012">咽喉を扼する</xref>
+<gloss>{form} vital passage</gloss>

N-gram counts:
柹	86

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

It's fine. JIS X 0212, so it gets into EDICT2, but not EDICT.

koj

does this kanji work? itaiji

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>柹</keb>

Closing.

AFAICT ざれる mainly means the same as たわむれる in sense 1.

Shouldn't ざれる go w it?

The じゃれる sense is [uk] and breaks the 2/3 rule. I'll split it off.
The last sense is [arch]. the refs quote the Genji Monogatari.

@@ -13,3 +12,0 @@
-<reb>じゃれる</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -19,2 +15,0 @@
-<stagr>たわむれる</stagr>
-<stagr>ざれる</stagr>
@@ -32,6 +26,0 @@
-<stagr>じゃれる</stagr>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>to cling and play around (of a cat, dog, etc.)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
@@ -46,0 +36 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

sankoku, daijr/s, meikyou, gg5

from my skim of the kokugos たわむれる has the 1st and 3rd meanings, じゃれる the 2nd and ざれる the 1st and 4th

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<reb>じゃれる</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -15,3 +17,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>じゃれる</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<stagr>たわむれる</stagr>
+<stagr>ざれる</stagr>
@@ -29,0 +32,7 @@
+<stagr>じゃれる</stagr>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to cling and play around (of a cat, dog, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>たわむれる</stagr>
@@ -33,0 +43,7 @@
+<sense>
+<stagr>ざれる</stagr>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to have elegance</gloss>
+<gloss>to have refinement</gloss>
+</sense>

I agree.

I don't think it's much use.圏 is a common suffix.

極地	81734	40.4%
極地圏	284	0.1%

北極圏	102432	50.6%
南極圏	5109	2.5%
極域	9344	4.6%
南極地方	1114	0.6%
北極地方	2282	1.1%

Maybe coined by extension(北極圏, 南極圏)?  Seems almost like a mistake, or redundancy, to have 地圏 "polar place region". 
The only other "地圏" entry is for "geosphere", "the region of the earth consisting of all of its 地".

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1240390">極地・1</xref>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

gg5

I don't think this needs a derog tag.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&derog;</misc>
@@ -14,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>dim-witted</gloss>
@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>dim</gloss>
@@ -18 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>dumb</gloss>

愚鈍	42845
愚鈍は	260
愚鈍が	227
愚鈍な	15730
GG5, etc.

Adjective glosses.

@@ -14,5 +14,7 @@
-<gloss>stupidity</gloss>
-<gloss>silliness</gloss>
-<gloss>asininity</gloss>
-<gloss>imbecility</gloss>
-<gloss>dim-wittedness</gloss>
+<gloss>stupid</gloss>
+<gloss>dense</gloss>
+<gloss>dim</gloss>
+<gloss>dull</gloss>
+<gloss>dumb</gloss>
+<gloss>obtuse</gloss>
+<gloss>slow</gloss>

GG5

I guess so. It's pretty much a "use-with-cate" word anyway.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<misc>&sens;</misc>
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
@@ -15,0 +16,3 @@
+<gloss>asininity</gloss>
+<gloss>imbecility</gloss>
+<gloss>dim-wittedness</gloss>

derog rather than sens?

This has a "副" PoS in all the kokugos. We don't use exp for such terms.

@@ -47 +46,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -56 +54,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>

@@ -46,0 +47 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -54,0 +56 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

〈こと／殊／事／コト〉(の)〈他／外／ほか／ホカ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 殊の外　　 │ 10,779 │  7.0% │
│ ことの他　 │ 22,653 │ 14.6% │ - iK (to show that 他 usage is irregular)
│ 事のほか　 │  4,167 │  2.7% │ - iK (to show that 事 usage is irregular)
│ 事の他　　 │  7,208 │  4.7% │ - (already sK)
│ 事の外　　 │  2,492 │  1.6% │ - add, sK
│ 殊の他　　 │    357 │  0.2% │ - sK
│ 殊のほか　 │  6,770 │  4.4% │ - sK
│ ことの外　 │  2,556 │  1.6% │ - sK
│ 事外　　　 │    607 │  0.4% │ - (already sK)
│ 殊外　　　 │    183 │  0.1% │ - (already sK)
│ 事他　　　 │  3,761 │  2.4% │
│ コトの他　 │    224 │  0.1% │
│ コトの外　 │     69 │  0.0% │
│ ことのほか │ 92,936 │ 60.0% │
│ コトのほか │    217 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

Just to be clear, the previous edit wasn't made by me posting anonymously.
My script for producing N-gram tables is free for anyone to use
https://github.com/stephenmk/edrdg-scripts

@@ -7,0 +8,16 @@
+<keb>ことの他</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>事のほか</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>事の他</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>事の外</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +25 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,3 +28,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>殊外</keb>
@@ -18 +32,2 @@
-<keb>事のほか</keb>
+<keb>ことの外</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -25,4 +40,2 @@
-<keb>ことの外</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>ことの他</keb>
+<keb>殊外</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

https://kotobank.jp/word/事外・殊外-2039430

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 殊の外　 │ 10,779 │ 22.4% │
│ 殊の他　 │    357 │  0.7% │
│ 殊のほか │  6,770 │ 14.1% │
│ ことの外 │  2,556 │  5.3% │
│ ことの他 │ 22,653 │ 47.1% │
│ 事のほか │  4,167 │  8.7% │
│ 事外　　 │    607 │  1.3% │
│ 殊外　　 │    183 │  0.4% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12,11 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>殊外</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>事のほか</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>事外</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Yes, I'm not convinced ことの他 should really be there.

@@ -202 +202 @@
-<s_inf>～上ル; in the Kyoto address system</s_inf>
+<s_inf>as ～上ル; in the Kyoto address system</s_inf>

@@ -204 +204 @@
-<gloss>north</gloss>
+<gloss>north of</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_addressing_system

@@ -193,6 +192,0 @@
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<s_inf>as 上ル; in the Kyoto address system</s_inf>
-<gloss>to go north</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
@@ -204,0 +199,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<s_inf>～上ル; in the Kyoto address system</s_inf>
+<gloss>above</gloss>
+<gloss>north</gloss>

G n-grams:

当てのない 8,374 74.6%
宛てのない 1,636 14.6%
宛のない　 1,221 10.9%

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>宛てのない</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>宛のない</keb>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

"ichi2" used not to rate a P in the edict edition. For years I've changed ichi1 to ichi2 when the term or form was obviously uncommon. There are about 100 of them.
The old ichi/news/spec tagging is a mess, and sorely needs revising.

I'm not sure what the reason for the downgrade is. We don't usually amend/drop (non-spec) freq tags unless there's an obvious error in the data. They're not based on Google n-grams. Plenty of ichi1-tagged terms have fewer n-grams than this. 
This doesn't meet the spec1/spec2 threshold.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>ichi2</ke_pri>
@@ -8 +8,0 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi2</ke_pri>
@@ -20 +18,0 @@
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Downgrade. It's still in the ichiman collection.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<ke_pri>spec2</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -13 +13 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>ichi2</ke_pri>
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>ichi2</re_pri>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<re_pri>spec2</re_pri>
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

gg5
Glossing as an adjective

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 煩忙　　 │     351 │  0.1% │ - rK (kokugos)
│ 繁忙　　 │ 325,820 │ 99.8% │
│ はんぼう │     453 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 繁忙　　 │ 325,820 │
│ 繁忙の　 │   4,164 │
│ 繁忙に　 │   3,190 │
│ 繁忙な　 │   2,730 │
│ 繁忙を　 │   2,124 │
│ 繁忙と　 │     744 │
│ 繁忙が　 │     513 │
│ 繁忙さ　 │     465 │
│ 繁忙は　 │     216 │
│ 繁忙して │      73 │
│ 繁忙する │      54 │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────╯

I suppose the [ichi1] tag should be downgraded to [ichi2] or removed altogether

@@ -4,4 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>煩忙</keb>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +9,5 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>煩忙</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -24 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>pressure of business</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +26,3 @@
+<gloss>high-stress</gloss>
+<gloss>hectic</gloss>
+<gloss>pressed (with business)</gloss>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<re_pri>spec2</re_pri>

Although it's recorded at the sense level, the [rare] tag applies to the term itself, and is usually intended to signal a lesser used alternative.. Perhaps we need a standard way of noting uncommon senses.

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>

I take your point on [2] not being rare in the context of "walking barefoot on the edge of a sword blade". 

The issue is that stats attach to the entire term, and [1], surprisingly, appears as "common" (due, it seems,  to news stats on crime reporting). This inadvertently gives the impression that maybe sword-walking is a commonly-recognized cultural activity in Japan.  This couldn't be further from the truth.  [2] is an arcane religious ceremonial activity(or an extremely arcane form of entertainment).  Yes, it is sometimes enacted, yes, this is the word for the activity. No, it is not something an average Japanese person would have any familiarity with. (vs., say, 綱渡り tightrope walking, or maybe even fire walking). 

To answer your question directly, "is there a better word", no, there isn't.  But that doesn't make this a good word.  The couple of Japanese news sources that mentioned this included a definition, presumably because the specific details of "刃渡り" are not comprehensible on their own(unlike 綱渡り, which brought me back here). So, if an E->J translator wanted to describe "sword walking" to a Japanese audience, they shouldn't expect to have success using this term to do it(without supplementary information).  Perhaps that does justify [rare].

My actual motivation was that a learner can safely discard [2] as "not worth learning"(due to cultural rarity, not just low ngrams).  It was also as to counter the stats on [1].  Lots of online Japanese learning resources just scoop up "common" terms from jmdict and present them as-is.  In this specific context, I think [rare] is the lesser of two evils, but I understand if this is rejected.

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

I don't think "(sword, knife, etc.)" is needed on sense 1.
I can't see why [rare] has been added to sense 2. Is there a more common name for this stunt?

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>length of a blade (sword, knife, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>length of a blade</gloss>
@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<misc>&rare;</misc>

刃渡り	38120	91.3%
刃渡	2061	4.9%
はわたり	1561	3.7%

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Several dictionaries: "the presence of glucose in the blood". The key word is *presence*. It's not the level (値).

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/glycemia

I'm absolutely not an expert on the subject, but all the search results I'm seeing on google say that glycemia is just another word for blood sugar concentration.

Glycemia is the ailment. I think Wikipedia is wrong. I've proposed an entry for 血糖症.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>glycemia</gloss>

gg5, wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_sugar_level

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>blood glucose level</gloss>
+<gloss>glycemia</gloss>

G n-grams:

水引　　 140,460 82.7%
水引き　  20,383 12.0%
みずひき   9,002  5.3%

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>水引き</keb>

カジヤ isn't used for sense 1.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -34 +34 @@
-<s_inf>usu. カジヤ</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. written as カジヤ</s_inf>

Never heard them called that.

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -33 +34,3 @@
-<gloss>cat's paw (small crowbar for pulling nails) (usu. カジヤ)</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. カジヤ</s_inf>
+<gloss>small crowbar for extracting nails</gloss>
+<gloss>cat's paw</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat's_paw_(tool)
A cat's paw or cat's claw is a metal hand tool used for extracting nails, typically from wood, using leverage. A standard tool in carpentry, it has a sharp V-shaped tip on one or both ends, which is driven into the wood by a hammer to capture the nailhead. Essentially, it is a smaller, more ergonomic, purpose-designed crowbar.

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/鍛冶屋/
２ 釘を抜くのに用いる、鉄棒の一端がL字形に曲がり、釘を挟む割れ目のついた工具。

I'm not sure how to mark it, but [2] is usually written in katakana specifically (and [1] probably never is...). You see this in shopping results, and on product labels. I doubt kanji are ever used for [2] in practice.

It seems that this matching (カジヤ = "cat's paw") is new information to the internet. But I'm fairly confident on this one.

Colloquialism for colloquialism(although, I guess the English has become more of a legitimate term).  The definitions exactly match from daijs and English wikipedia.  There is actually a picture in sankoku, and I recognized it immediately. I framed houses in college, and always had one on my belt.  A cat's paw/かじや is a mini crowbar for yanking nails out of things (you hammer the head straight into the wood, then pry the nail out).

Here's a カジヤ :
https://www.monotaro.com/g/00543119/
Here's a cat's paw (of all things, a Japanese import, but that's a coincidence):
https://tftools.com/en-jp/products/mokuba-precision-japanese-cats-paw-nail-bar

Second link has a video of the tool in use, not that it matters.

"prybar" and "crowbar" alone are more ambiguous than necessary.  If you see カジヤ in Japanese, you immediately know its size and purpose (it is not a 3-foot long crowbar, for example).

@@ -20,0 +21,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カジヤ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -30,2 +33 @@
-<gloss>crowbar</gloss>
-<gloss>pry bar</gloss>
+<gloss>cat's paw (small crowbar for pulling nails) (usu. カジヤ)</gloss>

WWW images.

@@ -28,0 +29 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

kokugos have a second sense.

koj: 釘抜きに用いるL字形の鉄梃。
sankoku: 〔俗〕箱などの くぎを ぬくときに使う、先がＬの字形に曲がった道具。

〈鍛冶／かじ／カジ／鍛治〉〈屋／や／ヤ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 鍛冶屋 │ 238,085 │ 69.4% │
│ カジ屋 │  29,258 │  8.5% │ - add
│ 鍛治屋 │   6,620 │  1.9% │ - add, sK (meikyo: 「鍛治屋」は誤り。)
│ かじ屋 │   3,417 │  1.0% │ - add, sK
│ 鍛冶や │   3,068 │  0.9% │
│ 鍛治や │     180 │  0.1% │
│ かじや │  37,597 │ 11.0% │
│ カジや │  21,876 │  6.4% │
│ カジヤ │   2,810 │  0.8% │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,11 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>カジ屋</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鍛治屋</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>かじ屋</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +26,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>crowbar</gloss>
+<gloss>pry bar</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

Daijirin: （１）金属をきたえて器物を作る職人。（２）刀剣をきたえる職人。刀工。
GG5:  a swordsmith

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>swordsmith</gloss>
+</sense>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metalsmith
A metalsmith or simply smith is a craftsperson fashioning useful items (for example, tools, kitchenware, tableware, jewelry, armor and weapons) out of various metals.[1] Smithing is one of the oldest metalworking occupations. Shaping metal with a hammer (forging) is the archetypical component of smithing.


Swordsmiths:
打物師	24	0.0%
打ち物師	0	0.0%

刀匠	23598	33.8%
刀工	17291	24.8%
剣匠	3117	4.5%
刀鍛冶	25803	36.9%

A whole article on Buddhist 打物 mentioning 打物師
https://kokadou.com/2020/05/19/職人のつぶやき仏具打物師編・仏具の話大谷派/
打物ってかいて、“うちもの”って呼びます。なんかボールを打つみたいですが、真鍮や銅の板を叩いて菊灯や、灯籠を作る職人を打物師といいますねん。

Just edited the entry for 打物.  The daijs entry for 打物師 actually says nothing about weapons. Not only that, but swordsmith implies swords, and 打物[1] is *any* metal weapon.  I'm not sure if there is an (esp. of weapons) sense here or not.  
daijs: 金属を打って器物を作る職人。

Seems like an 打ち物師 is anyone who hammers metal into stuff. Doesn't have to be a blacksmith (iron).  Could be a coppersmith, goldsmith, etc.  It's someone who makes uchimono.　　The last ref. is someone who works with brass and copper (not a blacksmith, not a swordsmith).

@@ -15 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>swordsmith</gloss>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>smith</gloss>
+<gloss>metalsmith</gloss>

I don't like "diet pill" but I see it's used.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>slimming medicine</gloss>

痩せ薬	7282	51.4%
やせ薬	6898	48.6%

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>やせ薬</keb>
@@ -12 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>drug used for weight reduction</gloss>
+<gloss>weight-loss drug</gloss>
+<gloss>diet pill</gloss>

* gg5: 〔美貌〕 a nice face
* concise: (1) good looks
* meikyo: いい顔だち

いい顔 264,062 82.1%
良い顔  56,823 17.7% <- smk
好い顔     896  0.3% <- meikyo, etc.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>良い顔</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -31,0 +36,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>good looks</gloss>
+<gloss>nice face</gloss>

GG5

GG5 has these as examples in its "sympathetic attitude". I wouldn't put it in a separate sense.

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<s_inf>often 〜(を)する</s_inf>
@@ -28,0 +30,2 @@
+<gloss>getting along with</gloss>
+<gloss>being all smiles</gloss>

いい顔(を)する can mean more than one thing, but most frequently I think it means "to suck up" or "trying to make a good 
impression" in things like 
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1012361025
"男性の前でいい顔して、裏でひどく性格の悪い女。対処方法。知恵をかして下さい。"
I mean it's "sympathetic attitude" as in sense 3 but it's very negative. While in いい顔をしない　(also an example of 
sense 3 and an entry on its own in daij) the いい顔 would have been a positive thing. I feel like this should be an 
additional sense, maybe?

gg5, chujiten, koj
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/sound-truck
街宣車	        60,754
街頭宣伝車	1,282

I don't think an abbr tag is necessary. The kokugos only have 街宣車 as a headword.

@@ -16,2 +16,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2748460">街宣</xref>
-<gloss>propaganda truck (van with loudspeakers)</gloss>
+<gloss>sound truck (used for campaigning, advertising or propaganda)</gloss>
+<gloss>loudspeaker van</gloss>
+<gloss>(right-wing) propaganda vehicle</gloss>

I think that's too wordy. It's 街宣+車.

@@ -16,3 +16,2 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>van (equipped with loudspeakers for speeches or music) used for political propaganda (esp. right-wing), election campaigns or commercial advertisement</gloss>
-<gloss>sound truck</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2748460">街宣</xref>
+<gloss>propaganda truck (van with loudspeakers)</gloss>

daijr/s, gg5, koujien

@@ -16 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>(right-wing) propaganda truck</gloss>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>van (equipped with loudspeakers for speeches or music) used for political propaganda (esp. right-wing), election campaigns or commercial advertisement</gloss>
+<gloss>sound truck</gloss>

gg5

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>at the close of a book, film, etc.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>at the end of a novel, film, etc.</s_inf>
@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -25,2 +24 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>providing fully</gloss>
+<gloss>full provision</gloss>

koj, daijr, gg5, shinmeikai, meikyo

also has broader usage

@@ -11,2 +11,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>The End (book, film, etc.)</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<s_inf>at the close of a book, film, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>The End</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +16,12 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>completion</gloss>
+<gloss>conclusion</gloss>
+<gloss>end</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>providing fully</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

I think it's just an abbreviation of ノーカウント.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>
@@ -11,7 +12,2 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<gloss>not counting (as anything significant)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&int;</pos>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<gloss>that didn't count!</gloss>
+<gloss>not counted (in the score)</gloss>
+<gloss>not tallied</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/ノーカン/
「ノーカウント」の俗な言い方。

https://ja.hinative.com/questions/19446750
As in: "That goal does not count!"
or: "You cheated, it doesn't count!"
--
So it literally means "no count."
But in English this should be "Doesn't count."

Daijs marks 俗.  sankoku just lists it without comment at the end of ノーカウント. 

Let's call [2] wishful thinking on my part. I know why we don't have a natural gloss, but it would be nice if we could cajole one in here somehow. Maybe just replace [1] with:
   not counting (as in "that didn't count")

Just saw this in an anime a couple times. Protagonist said/did something seemingly hypocritical, got called on it, reacted frantically with  "ノーカン.ノーカンでお願いします".　The first of those feels like an interjection. Here's the official translation:
"That didn't count! Please don't count that!"

Same character, next episode, falls into a bush that's covered in fertilizer(manure).  When his love interest explains to him that the bush has just been fertilized, he starts frantically trying to wipe himself off, while yelling:
３秒ルール！ ノーカン！　ノーカンだよね！

The first, again, felt like an interjection to me. Official translation:
Three-second rule! That didn't count... \NThat didn't count, right?

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -11,0 +13,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>that didn't count!</gloss>

Entry created

𣏕 is listed second in meikyo and daijirin.
I think 木屑 is more likely to be きくず. None of the smaller kokugos have it for こけら; only daijr/s & koj do.

Tagging 𣏕 and 木屑 as [rK]

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<keb>𣏕</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,3 +17,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>𣏕</keb>

三省堂

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>𣏕</keb>

OK. I'll retreat on the big 杮 vs 柿 issue.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>柿</keb>
+<keb>杮</keb>
@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<keb>杮</keb>
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>柿</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

Entry created

Brian, in response to your comments about adj-no: 

Over the past few years, there has been quite a bit of discussion about adj-no and how it should be used. To explain why adj-no is on so many entries where it doesn't seem necessary, here's a (slightly amended) comment I wrote a couple of years ago.

"In the past, adj-no was often added if the (Japanese) word had a corresponding 〜の entry in Eijiro. The problem with this is that Eijiro is a database of English->Japanese translations, meaning that those 〜の entries are actually inverted English->Japanese entries. If you look up 肖像の in Eijiro, you'll see "肖像の:【形】effigial" but the original entry is "effigial:【形】肖像の". Eijiro uses [noun]+の constructions to gloss thousands upon thousands of (often obscure) English adjectives that are derived from nouns. In many cases, a [noun]+の gloss is simply a way of explaining the meaning of an English adjective rather than an indication that the Japanese word is used with の to form an adjective."

In other words, English adjectives were used to determine whether or not Japanese nouns were adj-no. It was also observed that our definition of adj-no ("nouns which may take the genitive case particle 'no'") is so broad that it arguably describes every noun in Japanese, rendering the tag useless.

We tentatively agreed that adj-no should no longer be used in cases where a [noun]+の construction simply means "of [noun]" or "relating to [noun]" (e.g. 数学, as in 数学の問題). The idea was to reserve adj-no for nouns that more closely resemble 形容動詞 when used with の (e.g. 衝撃, as in 衝撃の告白). This distinction is by no means clear-cut. Indeed, a Japanese linguist probably wouldn't recognise a difference between these two uses of の. Nor is it a hard and fast rule. We often ignore it when it's convenient to do so. For example, if a noun is mostly 〜の or prenominal with an "of or relating to" meaning, we'll typically tag it as adj-no and gloss it as an adjective rather than give it an awkward and/or unhelpful noun gloss.

In summary, adj-no is messy and problematic. But even with the ambiguity and inconsistency in this new approach, it seems to be a significant improvement on what we had before. We've so far dropped hundreds of unhelpful adj-no tags and there are still plenty more to work through. Feel free to contribute to the adj-no cleanup, preferably while amending the entries for some other reason. We don't want the pending edits queue clogged up with adj-no removals.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1460200">南極圏</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1460180">南極・2</xref>

https://www.wordreference.com/jaen/南極地方
the Antarctic n	(South Pole region)	南極地方

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=南極地方
南極地方
Antarctic area
south polar regions
南極地方の
形
antarctic/Antarctic

Not as dramatic as the north pole:
南極圏	5109
南極地方	1114

See comments at 北極地方

Removing [adj-no] just so it is reviewed.  Should be consistent with　南極圏, I think.

Note：eijiro *does* mark 南極圏の as an adjective, in exactly the same way:
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=南極圏
南極圏の
形
antarctic〔Antarcticとも表記される。◆【対】arctic〕

It seems the only thing that makes a "place" into an adjective, is whether we have a dedicated adjective for it in English... ("fetus"/"fetal" is the word where I brought this up, and expected it to drive more discussion...)

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1460200">南極圏</xref>
@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>the Antarctic</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I don't think the x-refs are needed.

@@ -16,3 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1985060">お里</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2157470">親の顔が見たい</xref>
-<gloss>to reveal one's (poor) upbringing (through one's lacking manners, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to reveal one's (poor) upbringing (through poor manners, etc.)</gloss>

daijs: よくない意でいう

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>to reveal one's upbringing (through one's words, actions, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to reveal one's (poor) upbringing (through one's lacking manners, etc.)</gloss>

Entry created

何なら	59543	25.6%
なんなら	172748	74.4%

I wondered about [uk] but I suspect there are false positives.

@@ -36 +36 @@
-<gloss>then</gloss>
+<gloss>if that's the case</gloss>

https://www.nhk.or.jp/bunken/research/kotoba/20190701_12.html

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q12247173412
地方では「それなら」を「なんなら」と言いますので、特に流行ってる訳ではありません。

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q14198873079

@@ -24,0 +25,12 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>what's more</gloss>
+<gloss>furthermore</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>if so</gloss>
+<gloss>then</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/何なら/#jn-165921

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>if it's fine with you</gloss>
+<gloss>if you don't mind</gloss>

お鉢が回っ	6,951	86.9%	
御鉢が回っ	167	2.1%	
お鉢がまわっ	879	11.0%

@@ -8,0 +9,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>お鉢がまわる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +21 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2121530">お鉢が回ってくる・おはちがまわってくる</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2121530">お鉢が回ってくる</xref>
@@ -18 +23 @@
-<gloss>(for one's turn) to come round</gloss>
+<gloss>one's turn comes around</gloss>

Much the same, really.

better?

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>one's turn comes round</gloss>
+<gloss>(for one's turn) to come round</gloss>

OK

Clearer? Or not?

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>to close in on (30 years of age, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to close in on (a certain age, etc.)</gloss>

Entry created

入り違い	108			
入れ違い	123,210

Aligning.

@@ -16 +16,4 @@
-<gloss>passing each other</gloss>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>passing each other (without meeting)</gloss>
+<gloss>entering somewhere just after someone had left</gloss>
+<gloss>coming in just as someone had gone out</gloss>

スーパー大辞林

Looks OK.  There's a second ref in the above link, but I'm leaving it out as it's not clear to me exactly what they mean.

daijirin

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1520920">北極圏</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1520890">北極・2</xref>

北極圏	102432
北極地方	2282

地方 and 圏 don't seem like much of a distinction, the xref is way more common. Reverso commonly glosses this as "the arctic" (also "arctic region", also 北極地方の as the adj. "Arctic").

xref can also be "arctic region" if one likes:
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/北極圏#region

I don't know what an adjective is anymore after my previous spiel. I can't see why this should be [adj-no], while 北極圏 isn't.  With の, both will become "arctic" in English, and both will mean "belonging to the region of the north pole" in Japanese. 地方 alone is not [adj-no], and we have *many* entries ending with 地方 that are just [n].

That said, I know "arctic" and "antarctic" would be quite common glosses in English, and I don't mind at all if this is marked [adj-no].
But if so, I think 北極圏 should be as well. (same issue for the south-pole equivalent entries). 

Polar ice:
北極圏の氷	1639	 
北極地方の氷	31	  

from eijiro:
北極圏での石油掘削
Arctic oil drilling
北極圏動物
Arctic animal

etc... (lots)

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1520920">北極圏</xref>
@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>the Artic</gloss>

GG5, ルミナス和英辞典

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

新和英中辞典

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 見も知らぬ │ 8,418 │ 85.3% │
│ 身も知らぬ │ 1,115 │ 11.3% │ - add, iK (meikyo: "誤り")
│ 見もしらぬ │   189 │  1.9% │ - add, sK
│ みも知らぬ │    69 │  0.7% │
│ 身もしらぬ │    25 │  0.3% │
│ みもしらぬ │    50 │  0.5% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>身も知らぬ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>見もしらぬ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

GG5, etc.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>unknown (usu. of people)</gloss>
+<gloss>completely unknown (usu. of people)</gloss>

大辞林 + 大辞泉

I think think this is sufficient.

@@ -11,3 +11,2 @@
-<gloss>having the appearance of wanting to ...</gloss>
-<gloss>looking eager to</gloss>
-<gloss>seeming as if</gloss>
+<gloss>looking as if one wants to ...</gloss>
+<gloss>looking eager to ...</gloss>

ルミナス: (…したそうな様子である) look 「anxious [eager] to do…; (…かのように見える) look [seem] 「as if [like] …

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>looking as if</gloss>
-<gloss>seeming</gloss>
+<gloss>looking eager to</gloss>
+<gloss>seeming as if</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/たげ-559984

I think only the first definition is appropriate.

Probably not.

@@ -11,3 +11,3 @@
-<gloss>to have the appearance of wanting to ...</gloss>
-<gloss>to look as if</gloss>
-<gloss>to seem</gloss>
+<gloss>having the appearance of wanting to ...</gloss>
+<gloss>looking as if</gloss>
+<gloss>seeming</gloss>

Should this have verb glosses?

https://note.com/stapra/n/n408ef9f249e4
ライブパフォーマンス中の推し(特定の1人のアイドル)だけをカメラで追った動画のこと。
https://news.livedoor.com/article/detail/19658638/
“推しカメラ”とは、特定のメンバーに焦点を当てたパフォーマンス映像のことだ。
https://xn--46-lg4apa4ge0gvdvb5gyeua8578ghl0aj33c.com/release/推しカメラ機能.html
一人だけのメンバーを１曲追い続けた映像の事を言います。

It's the video.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>video recording in which the camera follows a specific idol during a live performance</gloss>
+<gloss>video recording in which the camera follows a specific member of an idol group during a live performance</gloss>

Does it refer to the video recording or actually the camera itself? I would assume it's the latter (though I could be wrong)

https://fanlore.org/wiki/Fancam

Plenty of web hits.
"fancam" is a very common term in K-pop circles.

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>video in which the camera follows only one specific idol during a live performance</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2742350">推し・2</xref>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<gloss>fancam</gloss>
+<gloss>video recording in which the camera follows a specific idol during a live performance</gloss>

https://note.com/stapra/n/n408ef9f249e4

Style alignment.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>o-mark (indicating correctness, agreement, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>O mark (indicating a correct answer, agreement, approval, etc.)</gloss>

GG5, ルミナス

koj, iwakoku
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O_mark
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/丸印

〈丸／まる／マル〉〈印／じるし／ジルシ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 丸印　　　 │ 25,735 │ 88.6% │
│ マル印　　 │  1,679 │  5.8% │
│ まる印　　 │  1,359 │  4.7% │
│ 丸じるし　 │     40 │  0.1% │
│ まるじるし │    167 │  0.6% │
│ マルじるし │     54 │  0.2% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

Despite it being in GG5, I think it can go.

I don't think this is needed. Rare compound. Meaning is obvious.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────╮
│ ボロ車　　　　 │ 12,687 │
│ ぼろ車　　　　 │    936 │
│ ポンコツ車　　 │  8,014 │
│ ぽんこつ車　　 │    263 │
│ ポンコツ自動車 │    506 │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────╯

This is an easily parsed A+B, and I think users who find this entry from reverse lookups would be looking for a more common variant.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

ボロ自動車	131	80.4%
ぼろ自動車	32	19.6%

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ボロ自動車</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -13,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>jalopy</gloss>

Given how rare the expression is, I don't think it's necessary.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

May as well have them both visible.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

daijr/s & koj display the 言えば form
山といえば川	145

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>山といえば川</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

山と言えば川	133

https://kotobank.jp/word/山と言えば川-649050

Trimming.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>a parent's love for their chd is greater than a child's love for its parents</gloss>
+<gloss>a parent's love is greater than a child's love for its parents</gloss>

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>parental love is greater than the love of a child for its parents</gloss>
+<gloss>a parent's love for their chd is greater than a child's love for its parents</gloss>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&proverb;</misc>

親思う心にまさる親心	501	    
親思う心に勝る親心	396	    
親思う心にまさる親ごころ	20	  
ルミナス

@@ -5,0 +6,7 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>親思う心に勝る親心</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>親思う心にまさる親ごころ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12 +19 @@
-<gloss>heart of the parent who thinks of the child is deeper than the child thinks of the parent</gloss>
+<gloss>parental love is greater than the love of a child for its parents</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/親思う心にまさる親心-454978

医学英和辞典, KOD

シャーガス病	1777
https://www.eisai.co.jp/sustainability/atm/ntds/diseases/chagas.html

Pub around the corner.

Is this a place? (other than the Artic Circle, for which we have another entry in jmdict). I can't find one.

Needs its own entry.

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ほんだや</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -16,4 +12,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<misc>&surname;</misc>
-<gloss>Hondaya</gloss>

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ほんだや</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -13,0 +17,4 @@
+<sense>
+<misc>&surname;</misc>
+<gloss>Hondaya</gloss>
+</sense>

Weird

From 5650382.