gg5
圧搾	81325
あっ搾	0

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>あっ搾</keb>
@@ -18,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>pressing</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog, luminous
丸出し	685109	96.2%
丸だし	18627	2.6%
まる出し	8262	1.2%

We try not to mix noun and adjectives glosses in the same sense.
Looking at example sentences, I think it's probably best to make this adj-no and ditch the noun glosses.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -22,6 +25,6 @@
-<gloss>exposing fully</gloss>
-<gloss>fully exposed</gloss>
-<gloss>uncovering completely</gloss>
-<gloss>being in full view</gloss>
-<gloss>putting on display</gloss>
-<gloss>not disguising</gloss>
+<gloss>(fully) exposed</gloss>
+<gloss>bare</gloss>
+<gloss>uncovered</gloss>
+<gloss>in full view</gloss>
+<gloss>undisguised</gloss>
+<gloss>broad (accent)</gloss>

This is to make it easier to find since "expose"/"exposed" is used more in search than "exposing".

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>fully exposed</gloss>

Except it's a noun, and you just changed the gloss to an adjective. See the 2017 comments.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>fully exposed</gloss>
+<gloss>exposing fully</gloss>

"Fully exposed" is a much better way to describe the word than "exposing fully" as this is less natural and sounds a little awkward.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>exposing fully</gloss>
+<gloss>fully exposed</gloss>

meikyo, daij

Trimming.

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>showing special confidence and courtesy (to someone, often to convince them to take a post, etc.)</gloss>
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<gloss>showing (someone) special courtesy (to persuade them to take a post)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 三顧の礼　　 │ 15,487 │ 98.1% │
│ 三顧之礼　　 │    105 │  0.7% │ 🡠 adding (jitenon, shinmeikai yoji, gakken yoji)
│ さんこのれい │    202 │  1.3% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>三顧之礼</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

gg5, luminous, daij

GG5 has "attempt" but I don't think it's a good fit. It's not used in any of the example sentences and the EJs only have "試みる" for "attempt".

@@ -23 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>to attempt</gloss>
+<gloss>to try (out)</gloss>
+<gloss>to have a try (at)</gloss>
@@ -25 +26 @@
-<gloss>to try out</gloss>
+<gloss>to put to the test</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 試す　 │ 894,280 │ 93.3% │
│ 験す　 │   1,326 │  0.1% │ 🡠 rK (gg5, iwanami)
│ ためす │  63,407 │  6.6% │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

meikyo: 「スポーツで、…」

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>

Fixed the sentences.

gg5, prog, daijr, meikyo, nikk

Nikk and meikyo have a separate sense for "advancing to the next round". I think this is clearer.

@@ -20,5 +20,11 @@
-<gloss>advance (into a new market or stage of progress)</gloss>
-<gloss>launching (a new career or venture)</gloss>
-<gloss>expanding (into a new market)</gloss>
-<gloss>stepping forward</gloss>
-<gloss>emerging</gloss>
+<gloss>advance (into a new market, industry, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>expansion (into)</gloss>
+<gloss>launch (into)</gloss>
+<gloss>entering</gloss>
+<gloss>making inroads (into)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>advance (to the next round of a competition)</gloss>

mk (2 senses)

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>living to no purpose</gloss>

jitenon, gakken yoji, nikkoku
https://yoji.jitenon.jp/yojib/723.html

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>すいせいぼうし</reb>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

gg5
たどり着く	508624	61.7%
辿り着く	        269797	32.7%
辿りつく	        45387	5.5%

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22,2 +23,3 @@
-<gloss>to arrive at (after a struggle)</gloss>
-<gloss>to finally reach</gloss>
+<gloss>to (finally) arrive at</gloss>
+<gloss>to reach (at last)</gloss>
+<gloss>to (manage to) get to</gloss>
@@ -25 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>to finally hit on (e.g. an idea)</gloss>

G n-grams:
 たどり着く	508624
 辿り着く  	269797
 辿りつく  	 45387
 たどりつく	114106

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>

gg5

No reference.
Trimming.

@@ -21,5 +21,3 @@
-<gloss>to struggle on to</gloss>
-<gloss>to arrive somewhere after a struggle</gloss>
-<gloss>to grope along to</gloss>
-<gloss>to barely manage to reach</gloss>
-<gloss>to finally arrive at</gloss>
+<gloss>to arrive at (after a struggle)</gloss>
+<gloss>to finally reach</gloss>
+<gloss>to find one's way to</gloss>
@@ -27 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>learn about</gloss>

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>learn about</gloss>

I've done it.

I'll reopen as a reminder that the sentences need attention. Most are for sense 2.

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<gloss>to follow (a road)</gloss>
-<gloss>to pursue (a course)</gloss>
+<gloss>to follow (a road, path, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -19,2 +18,20 @@
-<gloss>to follow up</gloss>
-<gloss>to follow (a hyperlink)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to follow (a clue, scent, tracks, plot, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to trace (a route, history, family tree, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to retrace (e.g. one's memory)</gloss>
+<gloss>to search</gloss>
+<gloss>to go over</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to head towards (of a situation)</gloss>
+<gloss>to go in the direction of</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (a course)</gloss>
+<gloss>to pursue (a path)</gloss>
+<gloss>to meet (a fate)</gloss>

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to follow (road)</gloss>
-<gloss>to pursue (course)</gloss>
+<gloss>to follow (a road)</gloss>
+<gloss>to pursue (a course)</gloss>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>to follow (hyperlink)</gloss>
+<gloss>to follow (a hyperlink)</gloss>

GG5, etc.

Sense [2] doesn't necessarily seem to be about an enemy

I think "rubbing salt" is typically how this is expressed

@@ -42 +41,0 @@
-<gloss>additional attack on a weakened enemy</gloss>
@@ -43,0 +43 @@
+<gloss>rubbing salt into a wound</gloss>

Yes.

@@ -5,0 +6,2 @@
+<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>nf16</ke_pri>
@@ -9,2 +10,0 @@
-<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf16</ke_pri>

╭─ーーーー─┬───────╮
│ 追いうち │ 3,571 │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────╯

Should the priority tag be moved?

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>追いうち</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I think they can.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19,0 +21 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22,0 +25 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

帆柱	15431
檣	4595
マスト	439354

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1128080">マスト</xref>

Tanaka sentence: アマゾン川は延々と北ブラジルを流れている。 The Amazon River meanders through northern Brazil.
延々と流れ	5309
蜿蜒と流れ	0
えんえんと流れ	195
---
延々と連なる	1059
蜿蜒と連なる	0
えんえんと連なる	31
---
延々長蛇	        315
蜿蜒長蛇	        40
えんえん長蛇	21

Despite what the kokugos day, 延々 is also used for sense 2 (and is much more common than 蜿蜒).

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +23,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>蜒々</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -28,0 +36,3 @@
+<stagk>延々</stagk>
+<stagk>延延</stagk>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -30,2 +39,0 @@
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
-<gloss>forever</gloss>
@@ -33 +41,2 @@
-<gloss>on and on</gloss>
+<gloss>continuously</gloss>
+<gloss>(going) on and on</gloss>
@@ -39 +47,0 @@
-<gloss>wandering</gloss>
@@ -43 +50,0 @@
-<gloss>zigzagging</gloss>

It looks like this needs to be split.
GG5 is my only reference which merges these forms.
Going by the kokugos, it looks like 延延 applies strictly to our sense [1] and 蜿蜒 is sense [2].

蜿蜿 and 蜒蜒 (distinct from 蜿蜒) are both mentioned in meikyo and iwanami.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 延々　　 │ 351,921 │ 83.5% │
│ 延延　　 │   2,099 │  0.5% │
│ 蜿蜒　　 │   1,573 │  0.4% │
│ 蜿々　　 │     131 │  0.0% │
│ 蜿蜿　　 │     157 │  0.0% │
│ 蜒々　　 │      88 │  0.0% │ 🡠 not currently in JMdict
│ 蜒蜒　　 │       0 │  0.0% │ 🡠 not currently in JMdict
│ えんえん │  65,743 │ 15.6% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

gg5, daij
検算	17993	98.5%
験算	281	1.5%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,3 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>verification of accounts</gloss>
-<gloss>checking figures</gloss>
-<gloss>arithmetic check</gloss>
+<gloss>verification of a calculation</gloss>
+<gloss>checking (the result of) a calculation</gloss>
+<gloss>going over one's figures</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

meikyo: 「1度に」は誤り。

@@ -6,0 +7,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>１度に</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Closing.

@@ -24,2 +24 @@
-<re_restr>口喧嘩</re_restr>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

I'd drop it or make it sk.

It's not 2.4% total if 口喧嘩 is read as くちけんか some of the time.

Is it common enough to be included as ik? I don't rememver if we ever settled on a specific percentage of hits but the argument Robin and I've made previously is that ik/iK's should only be included if they're common. I don't think 2.4% in total for -kenka cuts it.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 常套手段　　　　　 │ 86,350 │ 97.4% │
│ 常とう手段　　　　 │  1,354 │  1.5% │ 🡠 sK
│ 上等手段　　　　　 │    773 │  0.9% │ 🡠 adding (変換ミス)
│ じょうとう手段　　 │     35 │  0.0% │
│ じょうとうしゅだん │    153 │  0.2% │
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>上等手段</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

新和英中辞典

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>old trick</gloss>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 劇症肝炎　　　　　 │ 19,486 │ 97.8% │
│ 激症肝炎　　　　　 │    338 │  1.7% │ 🡠 adding
│ げきしょうかんえん │    103 │  0.5% │
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>激症肝炎</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ トルコ石　 │ 93,993 │ 99.6% │
│ 土耳古石　 │    224 │  0.2% │ 🡠 adding (google images shows some real usages)
│ 土耳其石　 │      0 │  0.0% │ 🡠 seems to be used in Chinese
│ トルコいし │    137 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>土耳古石</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5

I don't think we do. I'm not even sure this entry is needed.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>to punish (e.g. a child)</gloss>
+<gloss>to impose a punishment (on)</gloss>
+<gloss>to punish</gloss>

not sure we need to specify that

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>to punish (e.g. a child, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to punish (e.g. a child)</gloss>

gg5, wisdom

The expl gloss should be a note but I don't think it's needed.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">from strategy of general Han Xin in the Battle of Jingxing</gloss>
+<gloss>last-ditch effort</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

I don't mind dropping the kanji from this one, but given the counts I think we need at least one entry recording お頭 and 御頭. I've proposed one for おかしら and we can discuss it there.

@@ -4,8 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>お頭</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>御頭</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -17 +8,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -23 +13,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

It might be best to drop the kanji altogether. Nikk also has entries for 御頭/おかしら, 御頭/おつむり and 御頭/あとう, none of which is in jmdict.

I agree about おかしら, etc.

No other ref has kanji for this. I think お頭/御頭 is much more likely to be おかしら or おあたま.
I don't think the x-ref is needed. つむ isn't in the JEs or meikyo/shinmeikai.
I don't think the etymological note or abbr tag is needed. おつむり is archaic 女房詞.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,2 +16,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2791510">頭・つむ</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<s_inf>from おつむり</s_inf>

nikkoku has some examples of お頭 with this reading (and also other readings like お‐とう)
https://kotobank.jp/word/御頭-451249

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ お頭　 │ 38,144 │ 39.5% │ 🡠 adding
│ 御頭　 │  9,342 │  9.7% │
│ おつむ │ 49,158 │ 50.9% │
╰─ーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>お頭</keb>
+</k_ele>

gg5, chujiten, koj

I don't think the x-refs are needed.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24 +24,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1456370">読解</xref>
@@ -26 +26 @@
-<gloss>to subject to close analysis</gloss>
+<gloss>to interpret (e.g. a difficult text)</gloss>
@@ -28 +28,2 @@
-<gloss>to read carefully (esp. a difficult text)</gloss>
+<gloss>to read carefully</gloss>
+<gloss>to analyze</gloss>
@@ -33 +33,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1199200">解読</xref>

I doubt it.

読解く is in daijs and shinmeikai, but I'm not sure it's worth displaying.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 読み解く │ 640,415 │ 95.4% │
│ 読みとく │  30,524 │  4.5% │ 🡠 adding (jitsuyou)
│ よみ解く │      85 │  0.0% │ 🡠 adding (jitsuyou)
│ 読解く　 │      28 │  0.0% │ 🡠 adding
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,11 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>読みとく</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>よみ解く</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>読解く</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +32 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

meikyo, shinmeikai

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1312260">験す</xref>
-<gloss>to attempt</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to try (out)</gloss>
@@ -15 +15,9 @@
-<gloss>to try out</gloss>
+<gloss>to put to the test</gloss>
+<gloss>to put to a trial</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&vs-s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to check (a calculation)</gloss>
+<gloss>to go over</gloss>
+<gloss>to verify</gloss>

Entry created

帆檣	113
帆柱	15431
檣	4595

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

gg5 koj daij

daijr/s

Aligning.
Added kanji form.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>獐</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -23 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)</gloss>
+<gloss>roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)</gloss>
+<gloss>European roe</gloss>

koj, daij, wiki

OK

I think it's reasonable to split in this case.
GG5 uses kana in its examples.

@@ -13,22 +12,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かぶり</reb>
-<re_restr>頭</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>つむり</reb>
-<re_restr>頭</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>つむ</reb>
-<re_restr>頭</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>つぶり</reb>
-<re_restr>頭</re_restr>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かぶ</reb>
-<re_restr>頭</re_restr>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
@@ -36,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Go ahead if you want to. I feel it's useful having the 頭/head forms in the one entry, but I'm not fussed.
An alternative might be to make 首 an [sK] form and drop those restrictions.

I think this should be split into separate entries.
1. こうべ
2. かぶり (tagged as dated in meikyo)
3. つむり
4. つむ (abbreviation of つむり)
5. つぶり and かぶ could go together in an archaic entry or be dropped altogether.

"Meiji-Taisho" isn't a single period. I think a hist tag combined with the x-ref is sufficient. I've added "(1881-1925)" to 農商務省.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Minister of Agriculture and Commerce (Meiji-Taisho period)</gloss>
+<gloss>Minister of Agriculture and Commerce</gloss>

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<misc>&obs;</misc>
-<gloss>Minister of Agriculture and Commerce (Meiji-Taisho)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>Minister of Agriculture and Commerce (Meiji-Taisho period)</gloss>

Ok

We could make it an sK on パーティー instead?

Only seeing it used to mean "pearly" in a company name

パーティーを開く	15397
パーリーを開く	0

I don't think パーリー is used on its own to mean "party", except to imitate an American accent.
I can't find a source for "pearly". Doesn't appear to be used outside of names.
I think this entry can be deleted.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 餓鬼んちょ │    981 │  0.6% │ 🡠 rK
│ がきんちょ │ 50,065 │ 33.1% │
│ ガキンチョ │ 54,885 │ 36.3% │
│ ガキんちょ │ 45,286 │ 29.9% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20 +21 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1197980">餓鬼・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1197980">ガキ・1</xref>

jituyo
ngrams
ガキンチョ	1920
がきんちょ	742
ガキんちょ	1457
餓鬼んちょ	24

@@ -4,3 +4,3 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ガキンチョ</reb>
-</r_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>餓鬼んちょ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+<reb>ガキンチョ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -14,0 +20 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1197980">餓鬼・1</xref>
@@ -15,0 +22 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/ガキンチョ
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q109703450

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 高揚感　　　 │ 124,616 │ 93.7% │
│ 昂揚感　　　 │   7,925 │  6.0% │ 🡠 adding (jitsuyou)
│ こうようかん │     424 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>昂揚感</keb>

gg5 eij
G n-grams 124616

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>ハイウェイ・ラジオ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

ハイウェイラジオ	2973
ハイウエイラジオ	123
https://www.driveplaza.com/safetydrive/mam
echishiki/015.html

saw on sign on highway: "ハイウエイラジオはこ
こから”
missing nakaguro

Sense 2 is really a borrowing from English, and we tend to combine loan words that have the same English spelling and pronunciation into one entry, even if the etymologies differ. But given that lsrc tags will be entry-wide in the next generation of jmdict, it's necessary to split anyway.
Sense 1 is tagged as colloquial in daijs and meikyo.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2794630">マストバイ</xref>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
@@ -19,5 +18,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>must</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">juice of grapes or other fruit prior to fermentation into wine</gloss>

https://www.etymonline.com/word/must
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ムスト

Sense [1] has Germanic origins and sense [2] is from Latin. JA Wikipedia also mentions that sense [2] is from Latin.
Worth splitting?

No, there's only one and it is for the ship's mast.

Splitting from 1128080 based on source word.
Any sentences for sense 1?

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2102900">片棒を担ぐ・かたぼうをかつぐ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2102900">片棒を担ぐ</xref>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 片棒担ぎ　　　 │ 1,889 │ 87.1% │
│ 片棒かつぎ　　 │   281 │ 12.9% │ 🡠 adding
│ かたぼうかつぎ │     0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>片棒かつぎ</keb>

GG5
片棒担ぎ	1889

OK

several example usages: https://idiom-encyclopedia.com/nensainomei/

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&rare;</misc>

jitenon: https://yoji.jitenon.jp/yojib/904.html

https://twitter.com/yuuki2014abc/status/1571677718680576000
According to this user on twitter, many "之 series" yoji are fair game in the yoji section of the kanken. Jitenon also has kanken 1 tags on many 之 yoji.

The notion that "之 = illegitimate yoji" continues to seem unfounded to me. Wikipedia's yoji article mentions differing schools of thought on this topic, but popular opinion is apparently in favor of their inclusion.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────╮
│ 燃犀之明　　　 │ 26 │ 🡠 6,110 google web hits
│ 燃犀の明　　　 │  0 │ 🡠 123 google web hits
│ ねんさいのめい │ 22 │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────╯

jitenon: https://yoji.jitenon.jp/yoji/323.html

many usage examples on this page:
https://idiom-encyclopedia.com/kikainokokoro/

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬─────╮
│ 機械の心　　　 │ 760 │
│ 機械之心　　　 │ 622 │
│ きかいのこころ │   0 │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴─────╯

Actual usage frequency seems to heavily favor 機械の心, so I've provisionally added [exp][id] tags rather than [yoji]

KOD

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>market intervention</gloss>
+<gloss>currency market intervention</gloss>
+<gloss>foreign exchange intervention</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/為替介入-468691

国や地域の通貨当局が、自国通貨の為替相場を安定させるために、外国為替市場で通貨を売買すること

I think noun glosses work better here.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -12,3 +13,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>safe kept</gloss>
-<gloss>forbidden to leave</gloss>
+<gloss>safekeeping</gloss>
+<gloss>not going outside</gloss>
+<gloss>not letting outside</gloss>

GG5, daijr/s, koj, shinmeikai, meikyo, etc.
seems to be mostly adjectival

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────╮
│ 不出　　　 │ 4,464 │
│ 不出の　　 │ 1,868 │
│ 不出の秘術 │   343 │
│ 不出の宝　 │   171 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────╯

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_deer
ノロ鹿	218

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ノロ鹿</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -19 +22 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2667380">麞</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2667380">ノロ</xref>
@@ -21 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)</gloss>
+<gloss>roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)</gloss>
+<gloss>European roe</gloss>

獐鹿	0
のろじか	47
ノロジカ	754
のろ鹿	195

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>のろ鹿</keb>
+</k_ele>

wiki
https://kotobank.jp/word/ノロジカ-859891

Split from 2842054.

GG5

daij, koj

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&surname;</misc>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearly#People

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<misc>&fem;</misc>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>Pearlie</gloss>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<gloss>Pearly</gloss>

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&surname;</misc>

Splitting.

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>東京ビックサイト</keb>

ビックサイト cannot be read ビッグサイト

G n-grams:

東京ビッグサイト 129,082 69.6%
東京ビックサイト  56,420 30.4%

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>東京ビックサイト</keb>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&place;</misc>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/竜騎士
https://finalfantasy.fandom.com/wiki/Dragoon_(job)

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 竜騎士　　 │ 157,658 │
│ りゅうきし │   1,216 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────╯

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/シンドラーのリスト

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬────────╮
│ シンドラーのリスト │ 39,385 │
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴────────╯

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/石井大裕

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/内山靖崇

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/辻野隆三

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/内島萌夏

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/加藤未唯

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/柴原瑛菜

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/瀬間詠里花

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/高畑寿弥

Split.