None of my refs mention 公害 in their entries for 汚染

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1273420">公害・こうがい</xref>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Xref problem again.

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1273420">公害・こうがい</xref>

Syn: 公害

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1273420">公害</xref>

I think it's a kanwa thing.

None of my refs have 懷 for ふところ explicitly.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 懐　　　　 │ 930,302 │ 89.3% │
│ 懷　　　　 │   5,918 │  0.6% │ 🡠 [oK] to [sK]
│ ふところ　 │ 106,011 │ 10.2% │
├─ーーーーー─┼─────────┼───────┤
│ 懐に　　　 │ 206,601 │ 86.8% │
│ 懷に　　　 │     454 │  0.2% │
│ ふところに │  30,828 │ 13.0% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Reindexed the 5 sentences.

gg5, prog, daij

This entry needed some work.

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>inside the breast of one's clothing (esp. kimono)</gloss>
@@ -23 +24 @@
-<gloss>bust</gloss>
+<gloss>(breast) pocket</gloss>
@@ -27 +28,19 @@
-<gloss>(breast) pocket</gloss>
+<gloss>space between one's chest and outstretched arms</gloss>
+<gloss>(one's) reach</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>heart (e.g. of a mountain)</gloss>
+<gloss>bosom (e.g. of nature)</gloss>
+<gloss>depths</gloss>
+<gloss>inner part</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>mind</gloss>
+<gloss>heart</gloss>
+<gloss>inner thoughts</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>money (one is carrying)</gloss>
@@ -29 +48 @@
-<gloss>handbag</gloss>
+<gloss>pocketbook</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 決壊　　 │ 134,558 │ 99.3% │
│ 決潰　　 │   1,013 │  0.7% │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s, koj, etc.)
│ けっかい │  16,511 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Daijr (堤防などが破れてくずれること), GG5, etc.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>burst</gloss>
+<gloss>burst (e.g. dam, embankment, levee)</gloss>

gg5, prog, daijr

Added sense.

@@ -27 +27,9 @@
-<gloss>to follow another's example</gloss>
+<gloss>to follow (someone's) example</gloss>
+<gloss>to imitate</gloss>
+<gloss>to copy</gloss>
+<gloss>to pattern oneself on</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to learn (by observation)</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 見習う　 │ 155,066 │ 98.4% │
│ 見倣う　 │     739 │  0.5% │ 🡠 rK
│ 見ならう │     344 │  0.2% │ 🡠 adding
│ みならう │   1,361 │  0.9% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>見ならう</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Koj, Daijr

Both those references have it. It's quite uncommon - < 0.5% of the usage of 見習う.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>見倣う</keb>

@@ -18,3 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1179040">汚染・おせん</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1179040">汚染・おせん</xref>

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1179040">汚染・おせん</xref>

Syn: 汚染

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1179040">汚染</xref>

Indeed. Good as [sk] forms.

I agree こんにちわ can be considered an ik of "今日は".

I think it makes sense to look at absolute numbers when deciding what to include as sk/sK (something that should maybe be discussed on the Github). I don't think it makes sense to add sk/sK forms that barely register in the ngrams (which we have been doing in some obscure-ish entries), but these misspelled forms (that I think used to be included in the こんにちわ entry or somewhere) do get a couple of thousand hits. I wouldn't mind excluding them but since removing them in the first place did meet with some opposition from Jim (IIRC?), I figured he'd want to include them now that we can do so pretty painlessly.

I think こんにちわ should be tagged as irregular. Also, given that こんにちわ is pronounced identically to こんにちは, I think we can consider こんにちわ a reading of 今日は (and therefore drop the [nokanji] tag).
I don't think "used during daytime" note is needed. It can be inferred from the glosses.
Do we really need こにちわ and こにちは, even as sk forms? Aren't they just typos?

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
@@ -32 +32 @@
-<s_inf>は is pronounced as わ; used during daytime</s_inf>
+<s_inf>は is pronounced as わ</s_inf>

根まわし	936

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>根まわし</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

[vi]: shinmeikai, obunsha, sankoku
(meikyo has our sense [1] as [vt] and sense [2] as [vi])

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -25,0 +27 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

* gg5: prior consultation; doing the groundwork; forgoing making a decision until behind-the-scenes 
consensus-building is completed.
* wisdom: (try to) get a consensus on the matter before it is officially brought up to discussion.
* luminous: ... maneuver behind the scenes 
* eijiro: ... behind-the-scenes maneuvering ... consensus-building process ... prior consultation

"Making arrangements" is a bit vague here. Might warrant an explanatory gloss.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>making necessary arrangements</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>behind-the-scenes maneuvering</gloss>
+<gloss>consensus-building process</gloss>

gg5, prog, luminous, daij
取り付ける	911193	87.1%
取りつける	28340	2.7%
取付ける	        107186	10.2%

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>取りつける</keb>
+<keb>取付ける</keb>
@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<keb>取付ける</keb>
+<keb>取りつける</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19,0 +21,4 @@
+<gloss>to fit</gloss>
+<gloss>to fix</gloss>
+<gloss>to set up</gloss>
+<gloss>to furnish</gloss>
@@ -21 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>to furnish</gloss>
@@ -26 +30,3 @@
-<gloss>to get someone's agreement</gloss>
+<gloss>to (manage to) obtain (someone's agreement, permission, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to get</gloss>
+<gloss>to secure (a contract, support, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -31,2 +37,2 @@
-<gloss>to patronize</gloss>
-<gloss>to buy usually from the same store</gloss>
+<gloss>to patronize (a shop)</gloss>
+<gloss>to buy usually (from the same store)</gloss>

GG5, etc.

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/取り付ける

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>to install</gloss>
+<gloss>to equip</gloss>
@@ -20 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>to install</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

I think the "be reluctant" sense should lead. It's the most common meaning.

@@ -18,8 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>to hesitate</gloss>
-<gloss>to hold back</gloss>
-<gloss>to balk</gloss>
-<gloss>to falter</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
@@ -27,3 +19,6 @@
-<gloss>to be reluctant</gloss>
-<gloss>to be unwilling</gloss>
-<gloss>to begrudge</gloss>
+<gloss>to be reluctant (to do)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be unwilling (to do)</gloss>
+<gloss>to hesitate (to do)</gloss>
+<gloss>to grudge</gloss>
+<gloss>to be tardy (in doing)</gloss>
+<gloss>to put off (doing)</gloss>
@@ -34 +29,9 @@
-<gloss>to have loose painful bowel movement</gloss>
+<gloss>to falter</gloss>
+<gloss>to slacken</gloss>
+<gloss>to slow down</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1646460">渋り腹</xref>
+<gloss>to have a frequent urge to defecate but difficulty passing stool</gloss>

meikyo, koj, etc.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +26 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -30,0 +33 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

GG5, etc.

Splitting sense 1.

@@ -19,3 +19,1 @@
-<gloss>to be reluctant</gloss>
-<gloss>to be unwilling</gloss>
-<gloss>to begrudge</gloss>
+<gloss>to hold back</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +25,6 @@
+<gloss>to be reluctant</gloss>
+<gloss>to be unwilling</gloss>
+<gloss>to begrudge</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
@@ -28,0 +32,1 @@
+<gloss>to suffer from tenesmus</gloss>

JEs

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/準える_(なぞらえる)/#jn-164090

@@ -23,0 +24,6 @@
+<gloss>to liken to</gloss>
+<gloss>to compare to</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -25 +31 @@
-<gloss>to liken to</gloss>
+<gloss>to model after</gloss>

I've reindexed the sentences.

gg5, daij, meikyo

Yes, I think this is clearer.

@@ -20,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>to summon</gloss>
+<gloss>to send for</gloss>
@@ -22,2 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>to send for</gloss>
-<gloss>to summon</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
@@ -33,0 +35 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
@@ -40 +42,3 @@
-<gloss>to ride</gloss>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<gloss>to buy</gloss>
+<gloss>to purchase</gloss>
@@ -44,0 +49,15 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<gloss>to take (a bath)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<gloss>to ride</gloss>
+<gloss>to get in (a vehicle)</gloss>
+<gloss>to take</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
@@ -46,2 +65,6 @@
-<gloss>to take (a bath)</gloss>
-<gloss>to tickle (one's fancy)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<s_inf>as お年を召す</s_inf>
@@ -49 +72,9 @@
-<gloss>to commit (seppuku)</gloss>
+<gloss>to get old</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<s_inf>as お気に召す</s_inf>
+<gloss>to strike one's fancy</gloss>
+<gloss>to please one</gloss>
@@ -54,0 +86 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
@@ -61,3 +93,9 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<s_inf>used after the -masu stem of a verb</s_inf>
-<gloss g_type="expl">used to show respect</gloss>
+<s_inf>as お腹を召す</s_inf>
+<gloss>to commit seppuku</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
+<s_inf>after -masu stem of verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>indicates respect</gloss>

There's quite a bit going on in sense [5] here. Maybe we should at least split it into separate senses? See also sense [6] in 召される.

We also might want to add [hon] tags to every sense.

should this be aux-v?
the expl should really be part of the note.

@@ -59,0 +60 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>
@@ -61 +62,2 @@
-<gloss>honorific suffix used after the -masu stem of a verb</gloss>
+<s_inf>used after the -masu stem of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss g_type="expl">used to show respect</gloss>

gg5, prog, wisdom, daij, koj
少し	62635021
寡し	215
些し	257

As this is a JE dictionary and "skosh" is not an especially common word, I don't think it's worth including.
Not a noun according to the kokugos.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15 +16 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -25,6 +26,7 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>small quantity</gloss>
-<gloss>little</gloss>
-<gloss>few</gloss>
-<gloss>dash</gloss>
-<gloss>bit</gloss>
+<gloss>a little</gloss>
+<gloss>a bit</gloss>
+<gloss>a small amount</gloss>
+<gloss>a few</gloss>
+<gloss>some</gloss>
+<gloss>slightly</gloss>
+<gloss>somewhat</gloss>
@@ -34,3 +36,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>little while</gloss>
-<gloss>moment</gloss>
+<gloss>a little while</gloss>
+<gloss>a short time</gloss>
+<gloss>a moment</gloss>
+<gloss>a minute</gloss>
@@ -40,2 +43,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>short distance</gloss>
+<gloss>a little way</gloss>
+<gloss>a short distance</gloss>

"skosh" comes from "sukoshi" though so it feels weird to not include it

GG5, etc.

I think it's a bit slangy.

@@ -29,2 +29,2 @@
-<gloss>something</gloss>
-<gloss>skosh</gloss>
+<gloss>dash</gloss>
+<gloss>bit</gloss>
@@ -35,0 +36 @@
+<gloss>moment</gloss>

AmE

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<gloss>skosh</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 寝巻き │ 65,379 │ 36.5% │
│ 寝巻　 │ 11,217 │  6.3% │
│ 寝間着 │ 37,149 │ 20.7% │ 🡠 moving up
│ 寝衣　 │  4,381 │  2.4% │ 🡠 rK (daijr, koj)
│ 寝まき │  2,220 │  1.2% │ 🡠 adding
│ ねまき │ 58,972 │ 32.9% │
╰─ーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -6,4 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>寝巻</keb>
@@ -18,0 +15,4 @@
+<keb>寝巻</keb>
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -19,0 +20,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>寝まき</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -29,2 +28,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2560040">寝衣・しんい</xref>
-<gloss>sleep-wear</gloss>
@@ -31,0 +30,2 @@
+<gloss>nightwear</gloss>
+<gloss>sleepwear</gloss>

寝衣 is not really an ateji as 衣 isn't read まき. 義訓 maybe.

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

Added sense.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>to build (a nest)</gloss>
+<gloss>to build a nest</gloss>
@@ -31,2 +31,10 @@
-<gloss>to hang out (somewhere)</gloss>
-<gloss>to haunt (a place)</gloss>
+<gloss>to hang out (of a bad group)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be based (in)</gloss>
+<gloss>to haunt</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to lodge (in one's mind; of an evil thought, delusion, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be planted</gloss>
+<gloss>to luck (in one's heart)</gloss>

saito

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 巣食う │ 54,410 │ 58.5% │
│ 巣くう │ 35,002 │ 37.6% │
│ 巣喰う │  3,648 │  3.9% │
╰─ーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>巣喰う</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

May as well drop the gloss; the other two make it clear enough.

@@ -29 +28,0 @@
-<gloss>to reside in (a bad group, e.g. a gang)</gloss>

I think the intended meaning is not "to reside in a bad group" but for a bad group to reside somewhere?

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 滞納　　 │ 760,780 │ 97.6% │
│ 怠納　　 │     223 │  0.0% │ 🡠 rK (merged in daijs, gg5, obunsha, iwanami)
│ たいのう │  18,160 │  2.3% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daij, gg5

I think "non-payment" is too vague to have as the lead gloss.
Added kanji form.
Not [adj-no].

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>怠納</keb>
@@ -19 +22,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>falling behind (with a payment)</gloss>
+<gloss>being in arrears</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>delinquency</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -18,2 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>evidence</gloss>
-<gloss>exhibit</gloss>
+<gloss>physical evidence</gloss>
+<gloss>real evidence</gloss>
+<gloss>material evidence</gloss>

daijs, koj, meikyo (「物的証拠」の略。)

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1722680">物的証拠</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

OK

gg5, prog, meikyo

The more I look at this, the more I'm convinced it's just one sense.
Both senses in sankoku could correspond to "admonish". The "懇々と諭す" example for (sankoku's) sense 1 is also used in this GG5 example: "その店の主人は子供たちの盗みの非を懇々と諭した.　The store owner lectured children at length on the wrongs of stealing."

@@ -18,0 +19,5 @@
+<gloss>to make (someone) understand (a fault, mistake, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to reason with</gloss>
+<gloss>to advise</gloss>
+<gloss>to try to persuade</gloss>
+<gloss>to exhort</gloss>
@@ -20,9 +25 @@
-<gloss>to remonstrate</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>to explain thoroughly</gloss>
-<gloss>to make see the reason (in)</gloss>
-<gloss>to persuade</gloss>
-<gloss>to warn</gloss>
+<gloss>to warn (against doing)</gloss>

sankoku 7e also splits along the same line.

①〔親・先生などが〕よくわかるように（やさしく）言う。「懇々と諭す」
②教えみちびく。「不心得を諭す」

Daijisen: 目下の者に物事の道理をよくわかるように話し聞かせる。納得するように教え導く。
Daijirin: 目下の者に，ことの道理を理解できるように言いきかせる。
Meikyo: 物事の道理（特に、自分の非）がよく分かるように目下の人に言い聞かせる。また、行動の指針を与えて目下の人を教え導く。
Reverso - several of the early matches use "admonish"

We do not "blindly follow the other JEs" at all. There are many entries where we have taken quite different approaches to glosses. If you want to make a case I suggest you avoid weakening it by throwing in anonymous insults.
The JEs are not alone in their translations. All the kokugo explanations are couched as ticking off subordinates to some degree. I see if you drop the sentence you quote into Google Translate it offers: "Like Shiori admonishing a girl, he speaks gently and slowly."  So poor old Googe with its massive NN analysis of parallel texts came up with the wrong translation too.
That said, there is a difference between admonishing and remonstrating on one hand, and explaining and persuading on the other. While no reference does it, I think it's probably appropriate to split it into senses.
The parallels between さとす and さとる are very loose. I know Daijirin comments "「さとる」に対する他動詞" but I think that's stating a contrast rather than an equivalence.

@@ -20,0 +21,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

I'll preface this with a question:
if this is the transitive equivalent of satoru (to understand), why must the glosses be so wildly different?

Here is an example I dug up.
Context: they are on an uninhabited island. they found an unconscious girl, brought her to a cave to safety. She just woke up and seems alarmed
「恐がらなくてもいいのよ‥‥‥別にあなたに危害を加えるつもりで、連れてきたわけじゃないわ」
詩織が少女を諭すように、優しくゆっくりとした口調で話しかける。

I'm sure there are 1000s of other examples just like that outside JE example sentences. It might even be the most common use for this word.
Now, which glosses might fit this sentence?

× to admonish　× to remonstrate　△ to explain thoroughly　△ to make see the reason (in)　○ to persuade　× to warn　○ to reason with　○ to make (someone) understand

ISTM that saito is the only JE here that has the balls to try to actually translate the japanese word. in contrast the modern JEs each trot out a similar parade of synonyms that are only tangentially related to the original word, that only fit one context.

I wish JMDICT would not blindly follow the other JEs when this happens. and boy does it happen a lot.

Food for thought, for this entry, as well as others.

gg5, prog

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>fine</gloss>
+<gloss>fine (grain, workmanship, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>close (weave)</gloss>
@@ -21 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>close (closely woven, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>intricate</gloss>
+<gloss>elaborate</gloss>
@@ -26,3 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>elaborate</gloss>
-<gloss>detailed</gloss>
-<gloss>minute</gloss>
@@ -30,0 +30,5 @@
+<gloss>careful</gloss>
+<gloss>meticulous</gloss>
+<gloss>close (e.g. observation)</gloss>
+<gloss>minute</gloss>
+<gloss>elaborate (e.g. plan)</gloss>

Often just one sense.

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/緻密/#jn-142367
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/en/緻密/#je-47994
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/緻密

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>minute</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +21,9 @@
+<gloss>close (closely woven, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>elaborate</gloss>
+<gloss>detailed</gloss>
+<gloss>minute</gloss>
+<gloss>precise</gloss>
@@ -23,2 +30,0 @@
-<gloss>precise</gloss>
-<gloss>elaborate</gloss>

G n-grams 632711

@@ -7,0 +8 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

GG5, etc.

I don't think naive needs to be explained.

@@ -26 +26,3 @@
-<gloss>naive (i.e. innocent)</gloss>
+<gloss>simpleminded</gloss>
+<gloss>naive</gloss>
+<gloss>unspoiled</gloss>

Shinmeikai says 朴 can also be written 樸, but 樸 and 僕 don't get many counts in the n-grams.

〈純／淳／醇／じゅん／ジュン〉〈朴／樸／僕／ぼく／ボク〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 純朴　　　 │ 73,043 │ 98.2% │
│ 淳朴　　　 │    515 │  0.7% │
│ 醇朴　　　 │    121 │  0.2% │
│ じゅん僕　 │     72 │  0.1% │
│ 純樸　　　 │     62 │  0.1% │
│ 淳ぼく　　 │     61 │  0.1% │
│ 淳僕　　　 │     47 │  0.1% │
│ 淳樸　　　 │     41 │  0.1% │
│ 純ぼく　　 │     33 │  0.0% │
│ じゅんぼく │    229 │  0.3% │
│ ジュンボク │    163 │  0.2% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

https://kotobank.jp/jeword/純朴
a naive [an unsophisticated] person


I kind of liked these, I feel like they are sometimes applicable. 
https://eikaiwa.dmm.com/uknow/questions/3054/
Down to earth 
Honest 
Down-to-earth honest personality 
Down-home straightforward personality

"simple-hearted"
https://imperfectatbest.com/tag/happiness/
Let’s see how it can be interpreted. In the first place, we are not simple-hearted anymore. While small children burst into a fit of laughter in the next moment after throwing a tantrum, we, as grownups, like to make things complicated.
一つは、子供のような純朴さを失った。
Is this because of youth or because of devotion to a great cause at the expense of simple, if not naïve, happiness one could enjoy?
若かったからなのか、純朴とは言わないまでも、

homely
BRITISH
(of a place or surroundings) simple but cosy and comfortable, as in one's own home.
"a modern hotel with a homely atmosphere"
NORTH AMERICAN
(of a person) unattractive in appearance.

純朴	73043	96.2%
純朴が	105	0.1%
純朴を	201	0.3%
純朴は	56	0.1%
純朴さが	1269	1.7%
純朴さを	974	1.3%
純朴さは	263	0.3%

純朴さ	6464

I looked for some possibly-more-suitable glosses (and left refs), but I don't think I found anything reliably better.  I mostly just wanted to remove "homely", which for me means "unattractive". 

I don't know what to do if the British and English are in opposition.  Was "homely" from the British English sense perhaps?  There doesn't seem to be anything in this term related to physical appearance.

The "proper" noun is 純朴さ(also listed in sankoku), so removing [n] seems like better advice (even if there are straggling exceptions).

"naive" seems to be perfectly correct, except that there seems to be a strictly positives connotation. If that's the case, we might want to point it out somehow. (I gave "innocent", vs. the colloquial interpretation "stupid" , e.g. "don't be so naive"). 

sankoku doesn't mark it as 文 or anything else, and we have 70k ngrams.  But like a lot of these terms, they aren't necessarily so common.  I came across this funny q&a:
Q: 純朴を使った例文を教えて下さい。 出来るだけ日常で使う自然な表現でお願いします。
https://ja.hinative.com/questions/13916533
A: 日常では使いません。

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -27,2 +26 @@
-<gloss>naive</gloss>
-<gloss>homely</gloss>
+<gloss>naive (i.e. innocent)</gloss>

gg5, prog, luminous
純朴	73043	99.1%
淳朴	515	0.7%
醇朴	121	0.2%

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>淳朴</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -12,0 +10,4 @@
+<keb>淳朴</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,2 +25 @@
-<gloss>rustic simplicity</gloss>
-<gloss>homeliness</gloss>
+<gloss>simple and honest</gloss>
@@ -27,2 +28 @@
-<gloss>honest</gloss>
-<gloss>simple</gloss>
+<gloss>homely</gloss>

gg5, daij, koj

The threshold for rK is ~3%.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>commotion</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>turmoil</gloss>
@@ -29,2 +29,8 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>ups and downs</gloss>
+<gloss>ups and downs (e.g. in life)</gloss>
+<gloss>vicissitudes</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
+<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
+<gloss>small and large waves</gloss>

プログレッシブ
波乱	668357	93.9%
波瀾	43390	6.1%

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/en/波瀾/#clj-10000491000

@@ -23,0 +24,5 @@
+<gloss>uproar</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5

pos doesn't fit anyway

@@ -22 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>troubles</gloss>
+<gloss>disturbance</gloss>
+<gloss>trouble</gloss>
@@ -24 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>stormy, uproarious (e.g. relationship)</gloss>

@@ -15,3 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>not necessarily</gloss>
-<gloss>not entirely</gloss>
-<gloss>not altogether</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) necessarily</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) entirely</gloss>
+<gloss>(not) altogether</gloss>

あながち間違い	30923	94.6%
強ち間違い	1752	5.4%

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>

gg5, prog

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<s_inf>with neg. sentence</s_inf>
@@ -16 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>not uncommon</gloss>
+<gloss>not entirely</gloss>
+<gloss>not altogether</gloss>

shinmeikai, etc.

meikyo says only the second sense can be a verb, but none of my other refs make that distinction.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

All the JEs have "ornamental hairpin", which is not quite the same as "ornate".

簪　　　  71,016 15.4%
髪挿　　      27  0.0% <- only nikk; the other kokugos explain that 「髪挿し」 is the origin of the term
釵　　　   6,149  1.3%
かんざし 382,460 83.2%

簪を挿す　　　     119
かんざしを挿す     228

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20 +21 @@
-<gloss>ornate hairpin</gloss>
+<gloss>ornamental hairpin</gloss>

never seen it written in kanji

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

In the kanwas 釵 has the reading かんざし and the meaning "ornamental hairpin". A correspondent reports seeing it used in an old book with かんざし in furigana. Daijr/s have 金釵/きんさい meaning "gold hairpin".

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>釵</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

Probably harmless.

Appended G n-grams:

少子化　　　 1,095,820
少子化は　　    28,961
少子化が　　    74,941
少子化な　　     7,834
少子化の　　   147,141
少子化たる　         0
少子化と　　    35,644
少子化さ　　       100
少子化に　　    50,834
少子化を　　    37,818
少子化する　     1,317
少子化して　       676
少子化しない        63
少子化します         0

Shinmeikai does have this as [vs], but the other kokugos don't, and it doesn't seem like the n-grams support it much either.

shinmeikai 7e

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog
書き換え	923278	88.4%
書換え	61264	5.9%
書き替え	20529	2.0%
書替え	4186	0.4%
書き変え	10003	1.0%
書きかえ	24865	2.4%

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>書きかえ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -24 +28 @@
-<gloss>rewriting (book)</gloss>
+<gloss>rewriting (e.g. of a book)</gloss>
@@ -28 +32 @@
-<gloss>renewal</gloss>
+<gloss>renewal (of a license, bond, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -32 +36,2 @@
-<gloss>transfer of ownership</gloss>
+<gloss>transfer (of ownership)</gloss>
+<gloss>putting (something) in another's name</gloss>

Entry created

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ お釈迦様　　 │ 154,760 │ 69.6% │
│ お釈迦さま　 │  59,377 │ 26.7% │
│ 御釈迦様　　 │   2,581 │  1.2% │ 🡠 rK
│ おしゃか様　 │     963 │  0.4% │ 🡠 adding
│ おしゃかさま │   4,734 │  2.1% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>おしゃか様</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

お釈迦様	154760
御釈迦様	2581
お釈迦さん	9690
お釈迦さま	59377
御釈迦さん	786

I guess so. I'll do it.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>御釈迦様</keb>
+<keb>お釈迦さま</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>お釈迦さん</keb>
+<keb>御釈迦様</keb>
@@ -15,5 +14,0 @@
-<re_restr>お釈迦様</re_restr>
-<re_restr>御釈迦様</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>おしゃかさん</reb>
@@ -22,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1324230">釈迦・しゃか</xref>
@@ -24,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>the historical Buddha (5th c. BCE?)</gloss>

I think おしゃかさん should be split out - nobody but nikk 
puts さん as a reading for 様. おしゃかさん is not in daij, 
etc. I'm assuming it's ksb or archaic.

Entry created

gg5, luminous
昔ながら	        1423292	  
昔ながらの	1372905

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16,3 +17,3 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>the same as it was long ago</gloss>
-<gloss>unchanged</gloss>
+<gloss>unchanged (from long ago)</gloss>
+<gloss>as it was in the past</gloss>
+<gloss>same old</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 昔ながら　　 │ 1,424,301 │ 99.4% │
│ 昔乍ら　　　 │     1,864 │  0.1% │ 🡠 adding
│ むかしながら │     6,427 │  0.4% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>昔乍ら</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Entry created

OK.

https://www.english-for-students.com/despair-gives-courage-to-a-coward.html
daijr: "追い詰められた鼠が猫に噛みつくように，弱者も逃げられない窮地に追い込まれれば強者に必死の反撃をして苦しめる。"

I think that gloss is fine (although the actual quote, by Thomas Fuller, is "despair gives courage to a coward"). The meanings seem more or less equivalent.

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<gloss>despair gives courage to a coward</gloss>

I'm not a fan of the non-lit gloss. I was trying to come up with/find something similar in English, but the literal gloss is self-explanatory and pithy.

@@ -30 +29,0 @@
-<gloss>despair turns cowards courageous</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 窮鼠猫を噛む　　　 │ 6,655 │ 78.5% │
│ 窮鼠猫をかむ　　　 │ 1,318 │ 15.6% │ 🡠 adding
│ 窮鼠ネコを噛む　　 │   241 │  2.8% │ 🡠 adding
│ 窮鼠ネコをかむ　　 │    88 │  1.0% │ 🡠 adding
│ きゅうそ猫をかむ　 │    20 │  0.2% │ 🡠 adding (may as well?)
│ 窮鼠ねこを噛む　　 │     0 │  0.0% │
│ 窮鼠ねこをかむ　　 │     0 │  0.0% │
│ 窮鼠ねこを嚙む　　 │     0 │  0.0% │
│ 窮鼠ネコを嚙む　　 │     0 │  0.0% │
│ 窮鼠猫を嚙む　　　 │     0 │  0.0% │
│ きゅうそねこを噛む │     0 │  0.0% │
│ きゅうそねこを嚙む │     0 │  0.0% │
│ きゅうそネコを噛む │     0 │  0.0% │
│ きゅうそネコをかむ │     0 │  0.0% │
│ きゅうそネコを嚙む │     0 │  0.0% │
│ きゅうそ猫を噛む　 │     0 │  0.0% │
│ きゅうそ猫を嚙む　 │     0 │  0.0% │
│ きゅうそねこをかむ │   153 │  1.8% │
╰─ーーーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,15 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>窮鼠猫をかむ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>窮鼠ネコを噛む</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>窮鼠ネコをかむ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>きゅうそ猫をかむ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I suggest leaving it as adv and adding a note.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<s_inf>usu. 〜に</s_inf>

I wondered about the part-of-speech tag here. Would we consider it an adverb if it's mostly used with the に particle? Maybe [exp] would be better?

(On the other hand, daijisen does have a [副] tag for 涙乍ら)

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────╮
│ 涙ながら　 │ 104,762 │
│ 涙ながらに │  92,008 │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────╯

gg5, daijs

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>tearfully</gloss>

gg5, daij

We do often merge different forms of on-mim words, but as みしり is not vs, it needs to be a separate entry.

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>みしり</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -18,2 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>creaking</gloss>
-<gloss>groaning (under physical stress)</gloss>
+<gloss>with a creak</gloss>
+<gloss>creakily</gloss>

daijirin 4

not sure if I can just add an 'other form' with a different reading?

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>みしり</reb>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>groaning (e.g. under physical stress)</gloss>
+<gloss>groaning (under physical stress)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2760010">童貞喪失・どうていそうしつ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2760010">童貞喪失</xref>

Women and men, not even that far apart:
処女喪失	8654
童貞喪失	5588

more details at xref'd entry

changed "woman" to "female" to:
1. align with "of a male" entries on 童貞
2. actual correctness (no technical age requirements, I don't think)
3. political correctness (not my main concern, but anyway).

Add xref for clarity.  If you get here by searching 処女, you have to put in some work to see there is a male equivalent.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>loss of virginity (of a woman)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2760010">童貞喪失・どうていそうしつ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2760010">童貞喪失・どうていそうしつ</xref>
+<gloss>loss of virginity (of a female)</gloss>

Indeed.

"loss of maidenhead" sounds dated

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>loss of maidenhead</gloss>

prog

I don't like "truthy". It's not in any of the major dictionaries (with this meaning).

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>credible (e.g. of a lie)</gloss>
+<gloss>credible (e.g. lie)</gloss>
@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>truthy</gloss>
+<gloss>seemingly truthful</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 実しやか　　 │  4,469 │  9.9% │
│ 真しやか　　 │    965 │  2.1% │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s, meikyo)
│ 誠しやか　　 │    544 │  1.2% │ 🡠 rK (shinmeikai, GG5)
│ まことしやか │ 39,144 │ 86.8% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>specious (e.g. of an argument)</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>specious</gloss>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>ornate hairpin store</gloss>
+<gloss>hairpin shop</gloss>

G n-grams:

かんざし屋 4,487 95.7%
簪屋　　　   202  4.3%
髪挿屋　　     0  0.0%

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>かんざし屋</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

nikkoku

@@ -25 +24,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2826875">鉄槌・てっつい・2</xref>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 鉄槌を下す　　 │ 6,278 │ 92.6% │
│ 鉄槌をくだす　 │   384 │  5.7% │ 🡠 adding
│ 鉄ついを下す　 │    62 │  0.9% │ 🡠 sK
│ 鉄鎚を下す　　 │    57 │  0.8% │ 🡠 sK
│ 鉄ついをくだす │     0 │  0.0% │
│ 鉄鎚をくだす　 │     0 │  0.0% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+<keb>鉄槌をくだす</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -18,0 +19,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2826875">鉄槌・てっつい・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2826875">鉄槌・てっつい・2</xref>

daij, meikyo

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1348870">少し・1</xref>
@@ -14,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>slightly</gloss>

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1348870">少し</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1348870">少し・1</xref>

daijr

I think sense [2] is usually in the context of the referenced expression
meikyo: 非常に厳しい制裁のたとえにも使う。「━を下す」

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 鉄槌　　 │ 84,839 │ 92.5% │
│ 鉄鎚　　 │  4,047 │  4.4% │
│ 鉄つい　 │    296 │  0.3% │ 🡠 sK
│ 鉄椎　　 │    212 │  0.2% │ 🡠 adding (nikk)
│ てっつい │  2,288 │  2.5% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鉄椎</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22 +27,2 @@
-<gloss g_type="fig">crushing blow</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2692690">鉄槌を下す</xref>
+<gloss>crushing blow</gloss>

Reopen.

Daijr, GG5, ルミナス, etc.

Splitting from 1779760.
Approving to fix xref, then reopening.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19 +20 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1457410">豚カツ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1457410">とんかつ</xref>

Could drop that bit altogether.

Never heard of one made with mustard. Simplifying

@@ -22,2 +22 @@
-<gloss>tonkatsu sauce</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">sauce made from ketchup, Worcester, soy, mirin, mustard, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>tonkatsu sauce (usu. Worcester-based)</gloss>

@@ -11,4 +10,0 @@
-<reb>とんかつソース</reb>
-<re_restr>豚かつソース</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -16 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>豚カツソース</re_restr>
@@ -24,0 +20 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

G n-grams:

砂ふるい　 418 100.0%
砂篩　　　   0  0.0%
すなふるい   0  0.0%

Only in gg5.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>砂ふるい</keb>
+</k_ele>

研究社　新和英大辞典　第５版

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 杖をついて　 │ 19,422 │ 79.4% │
│ 杖を突いて　 │  3,340 │ 13.7% │
│ 杖を付いて　 │    614 │  2.5% │ 🡠 probably common enough for [sK]
│ 杖を着いて　 │     63 │  0.3% │
│ つえを突いて │     59 │  0.2% │
│ つえをついて │    967 │  4.0% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>杖を付く</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

杖をつく	2937	76.9%
杖を突く	775	20.3%
杖を付く	105	2.8%
nikk

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1457410">トンカツ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1457410">とんかつ</xref>

Meant to add these.

@@ -5,0 +6,10 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ひれかつ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヒレかつ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ひれカツ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

I guess we don't treat things containing abbr as wasei

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">fillet katsu</lsource>

ヒレカツ	68695	49.6%
ひれかつ	34879	25.2%
ひれカツ	11773	8.5%
ヒレかつ	23193	16.7%

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1457410">トンカツ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1457410">とんかつ</xref>

ロースカツ	55594	60.7%
ロースかつ	36053	39.3%

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1457410">トンカツ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1457410">とんかつ</xref>

タレカツ	1027	25.9%
たれかつ	320	8.1%
たれカツ	2019	50.9%
タレかつ	602	15.2%
垂れカツ	0	0.0%

タレカツ丼	618	21.2%
たれかつ丼	121	4.1%
たれカツ丼	1816	62.2%
タレかつ丼	366	12.5%
垂れカツ丼	0	0.0%

Possibly should be split, but it's not that common.

条件付運行	114

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>条件付運行</keb>

条件付き運航	233	50.7%
条件付運航	227	49.3%

could have a note on 運航 vs 運行 (or just xrefs to those entries?)

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>条件付運航</keb>

条件付き運航	233	73.5% (only refers to flights)
条件付き運行	84	26.5 (for boats etc.)

skymark:「条件付き運航」とは、運航することは決定しているものの、到着地の天候などの影響で、目的地に着陸することができず出発空港に引き返すことや、他の空港へ着陸する可能性があると判断した便のことです。

Couldn't find an official translation on JAL or ANA's websites though JAL uses the phrase "conditional operation" with this meaning on at least one page. I found something on Google in English about Qataar airlines but the phrase doesn't really seem to be in widespread use in English.

Merged.

チャールス	3615

Merging.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>チャールス</reb>

@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&male;</misc>
+<misc>&surname;</misc>

0 n-grams, a few www hits.

Probably bogus.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/青松敬鎔

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/青柳昴樹

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/赤羽由紘

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/飽本唯徳

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/浅田将汰

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/阿部剣友

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/安部建輝

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/網谷圭将

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/新井峰秀

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/荒砂任司

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/有光磐明

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/粟津凱士

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/安藤之制

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Toledo War</gloss>
+<gloss>Toledo War (1835-36)</gloss>

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>2856330</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -11 +10 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&ev;</misc>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/トレド戦争

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/平野紫耀