Don't use lsrc when a 外来語 is from English.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="eng"/>

GG5 daijr koj

* lsrc
* explain usage (inc. esp. “headline” sense, which is not 
usually called “caption” in English, outside of typography).

@@ -10,1 +10,2 @@
-<gloss>caption</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng"/>
+<gloss>caption (photo explanation, video subtitle, headline)</gloss>

Good idea to link to the entry for ピリオド (sense #1)?
.
I think ピリ should only be defined as the punctuation sense of "period" (that sense is corroborated by GG5) unless the other senses (period (era, amount of time); period (sports)) can be confirmed, and I haven't been able to do that.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>full stop</gloss>

杯	6180702	12.1%
杯	13469438	26.5%
一盃	6907	0.0%
いっぱい	31219894	61.3%
一ぱい	33279	0.1%

@@ -12,6 +11,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>一ぱい</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>１ぱい</keb>

Probably.

@@ -32,3 +32,3 @@
-<gloss>cup (of)</gloss>
-<gloss>glass (of)</gloss>
-<gloss>bowl (of)</gloss>
+<gloss>one cup (of)</gloss>
+<gloss>one glass (of)</gloss>
+<gloss>one bowl (of)</gloss>

Should sense 1 be "one cup (of); one glass (of) ..."?

@@ -42 +42 @@
-<gloss>a drink (of alcohol)</gloss>
+<gloss>one drink (of alcohol)</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

I've reorganised the entry but I think senses 1 and 2 should stay where they are.

@@ -32,2 +32,11 @@
-<gloss>amount necessary to fill a container (e.g. cupful, spoonful, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>drink (usu. alcoholic)</gloss>
+<gloss>cup (of)</gloss>
+<gloss>glass (of)</gloss>
+<gloss>bowl (of)</gloss>
+<gloss>cupful</gloss>
+<gloss>glassful</gloss>
+<gloss>bowlful</gloss>
+<gloss>spoonful</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>a drink (of alcohol)</gloss>
@@ -36,0 +46,3 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -38,5 +50,4 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>one squid, octopus, crab, etc.</gloss>
-<gloss>one boat</gloss>
+<gloss>filled (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>brimming (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>crowded</gloss>
+<gloss>packed</gloss>
@@ -46,2 +57 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -50,0 +61,2 @@
+<gloss>to the maximum</gloss>
+<gloss>as much as possible</gloss>
@@ -54,2 +65,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -58,0 +69 @@
+<gloss>many</gloss>
@@ -62 +72,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -66,0 +77,8 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>one (squid, octopus, crab, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>one (boat)</gloss>

I feel this entry looks a little weird and could use some work, esp. glosses for senses 1 and 3. I 
think sense 2 should lead and sense 5 should be higher up

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -62 +62,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

gg5 koj daijs

Cleaning up the poses for sense 1-3

@@ -30,2 +29,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -39,3 +36,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -45,2 +39,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -48 +40,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

plenty of examples on the web

@@ -14,0 +15,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>１ぱい</keb>

G n-grams 一ぱい	33279
https://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/一ぱい

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>一ぱい</keb>

Probably not.

tatoeba: 52 examples of １杯, all of them sense 1

We could add restrictions to the other senses, but is it really needed?

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>１杯</keb>

I'll tag it "oK". It's really only coming up in 国語辞典.

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,2 +25,2 @@
-<gloss>amount necessary to fill a container (e.g. a cupful, spoonful, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>a drink (i.e. an alcoholic beverage)</gloss>
+<gloss>amount necessary to fill a container (e.g. cupful, spoonful, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>drink (usu. alcoholic)</gloss>

nikk

possibly archaic? most hits are 一盃口（イーペーコー）, a mah jong 
term of some kind.

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>一盃</keb>

I think senses 5 and 6 are "uk" too.

@@ -51,0 +51,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -57,0 +58,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

'split' is also transitive

eij

i guess "to split" intends intransivity.. i doubt that 引き裂く is used this way. it's only a guess though.

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<gloss>to split</gloss>
+<gloss>to disrupt (a relationship)</gloss>

gg5, daijr/s

Split into senses.
引裂く not [io].

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,0 +24,6 @@
+<gloss>to rip up</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to separate (e.g. a couple)</gloss>

I just copied senses 2 and 4 from daijirin which has them as separate things.　I'm not sure that the "portable house" ones have disappeared. E.g. http://www.shimotsuke.co.jp/news/tochigi/region/news/20100710/348935

Koj also has them separated as (1) and (2)

@@ -32,1 +32,2 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">traditionally a portable shrine dedicated to a god and shaped like a house, now generally a dancing platform</gloss>
+<gloss>portable shrine dedicated to a god and shaped like a house</gloss>
+<gloss>dancing platform</gloss>

koj, daijr, daijs

ref for 家台 http://www.wattpad.com/55509?p=1

i think your sense 4 is the same as sense 2

@@ -24,1 +24,1 @@
-<gloss>cart, esp. food cart</gloss>
+<gloss>cart (esp. a food cart)</gloss>
@@ -30,0 +30,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2559610">踊り屋台</xref>
@@ -31,1 +32,1 @@
-<gloss>portable shrine dedicated to a god and shaped like a house used during festivals</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">traditionally a portable shrine dedicated to a god and shaped like a house, now generally a dancing platform</gloss>
@@ -35,1 +36,1 @@
-<gloss>small and miserable house</gloss>
+<gloss>stage prop fashioned after a large building</gloss>
@@ -39,2 +40,8 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2559610">踊り屋台</xref>
-<gloss>stand where one can dance used during festivals</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1613690">屋台骨</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>framework (of a house, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>house (esp. a small and miserable house)</gloss>

daij

@@ -8,0 +8,7 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>屋体</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>家台</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +23,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1815810">屋台店</xref>
@@ -17,0 +25,2 @@
+<gloss>stall</gloss>
+<gloss>stand</gloss>
@@ -20,1 +30,11 @@
-<gloss>(festival) float</gloss>
+<gloss>festival float</gloss>
+<gloss>portable shrine dedicated to a god and shaped like a house used during festivals</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>small and miserable house</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2559610">踊り屋台</xref>
+<gloss>stand where one can dance used during festivals</gloss>

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

必携 類語実用辞典 (merges)
daij, JWN, EDR日英対訳辞書

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>苦況</keb>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Daijr/s.

I suspect the 2nd sense is archaic.

@@ -18,2 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>sly</gloss>
-<gloss>cunning</gloss>
+<gloss>miserly</gloss>
+<gloss>mercenary</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/世知辛い/

Feel free to edit and use better translations as you see fit

@@ -14,0 +15,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>stingy</gloss>
+<gloss>sly</gloss>
+<gloss>cunning</gloss>
+</sense>

also this

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>勢ぞろい</keb>

@@ -6,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>勢揃</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

Reopen.

Hmmm. OK, maybe a split is best. I've created a "rare" 截断/さいだん entry. I'll close this and reopen briefly for any possible discussion.

@@ -9,4 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>截断</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,4 +18,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>さいだん</reb>
-<re_restr>截断</re_restr>

仙人掌 is currently tagged as [rK] for the reading シャボテン on entry 1387180. シャボテン has two surface forms: シャボテン and 仙人掌. Can we say with confidence that 仙人掌 is truly [rK] for シャボテン? It probably is (since 仙人掌 can also be read as サボテン and せんにんしょう), but strictly speaking I don't think we have any way to measure these usages. This talk about surface forms being rare for particular readings makes me kind of uneasy. I think it's safer to think of [rK] as being strictly "for the entry" rather than also "for the readings."

I agree that duplicating / splitting entries is a good practice when it enhances clarity. Unlike the サボテン entry (which is quite a bit busier), I personally don't see the benefit for this 切断 entry; I think the separation would just make it more disorganized. If it were up to me, my preference would be to keep the entry as it currently is.

All the kokugos make reference to cloth and paper for 裁断. I don't think a merge would be appropriate. It would also mean having to tag 截断 as an irregular kanji form.

> I thought the [rK] tags signify that surface forms are rare for their respective entries rather than for particular readings.
That's correct. But this is precisely why I suggest splitting out さいだん. By tagging a surface form as rK, we're marking it as "rare" for all reading and senses that apply to that form. It's for this reason that we don't tag a form as rK if it's above the 3% threshold for just a particular sense.

> I don't think splitting the entry adds any new information that can't already be inferred from the existing entry. 
Perhaps, but I don't think the entry in its current state is consistent with the definition of rK. We essentially have two words here (せつだん and さいだん), only one of which is rarely written as 截断. We split off はおうじゅ from サボテン for the same reason.

> The conventional wisdom with databases is to avoid data duplication whenever possible.
For years, this was more or less JMdict's policy, with even the slightest overlap being used as justification for merging forms. But it resulted in some very messy and hard-to-read entries, and we've since undone a lot of these merges. We permit some degree of duplication for the sake of clarity and readability.

Daijs has this to say in its entry for 截(せつ):
「截」を「サイ」と読むのは「裁」などとの混同による。

Sense [1] of 裁断 seems to have a specific cloth / paper nuance
which isn't mentioned in the せつだん entries. But since the サイ
reading of 截 seems to originate from 裁, I don't think 截断
would be out-of-place in the 裁断(さいだん) entry.

And just to confuse things, there is 裁断/さいだん/cutting (1296100 sense 1).  If we are moving さいだん from this entry, perhaps it should go in there?

I thought the [rK] tags signify that surface forms are rare for their respective entries rather than for particular readings. That's why we don't put [rK] tags on forms which have unique sense restrictions.

Outside of specific cases such as this one (in which the reading restriction is provided by the refs), I don't think we can adhere to that standard. For example, if in actuality 90% of the さいだん usages belonged to 截断 (rather than 100%), we probably wouldn't split 截断・さいだん into a separate entry. In general I don't know how we'd even go about measuring those sorts of usage ratios.

I don't think splitting the entry adds any new information that can't already be inferred from the existing entry. The conventional wisdom with databases is to avoid data duplication whenever possible.

Indeed, there's no difference in meaning. But 截断 is not an rK form for さいだん, only せつだん. I propose keeping 截断 on this entry, tagged as rK, and splitting out さいだん into a separate entry where 截断 is not tagged as rK. This would also allow us to tag さいだん as "rare".

The kokugos (daijr/s, shinmeikai) describe さいだん as 慣用読み and merely redirect to せつだん. Doesn't seem to have any distinct meaning from せつだん.

What is at stake by keeping さいだん in this entry? It's not clear to me how this could cause confusion.

By splitting the reading into a separate entry, I think we'd be making that information more difficult to discover. As it is right now, the info can be summarized into a single table:
https://gist.github.com/stephenmk/7da3f54216bfe5018706651e13efba2d

截断 is only rK for せつだん. For さいだん, it's the only kanji form. I think さいだん should be a separate entry.

Adding sK/sk forms.

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>接断</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 切断　　 │ 1,573,771 │ 99.9% │
│ 截断　　 │     1,015 │  0.1% │ 🡠 daijr/s, etc.
│ 接断　　 │       425 │  0.0% │ 🡠 drop and hide (no refs)
│ せつだん │     2,167 │  N/A  │
│ さいだん │     2,955 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

HiddenForm 接断[iK]

@@ -12,4 +12 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>接断</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daij, shinmeikai, my ime

@@ -22,0 +23,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>さいだん</reb>
+<re_restr>截断</re_restr>
+</r_ele>

merge

not in any of my sources; i suspect it is [iK].  probably gets enough non-edict web hits to be worth recording though

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>接断</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

Koj, Daijr, Wadoku (all merge).

Merging 1567110.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>截断</keb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| 憧れて　　 | 909,869 | 80.2% |
| 憬れて　　 |   2,104 |  0.2% | <- daijr/s, mk
| 憧憬れて　 |      35 |  0.0% | <- no refs; this is the only inflection that gets any n-gram counts. dropping
| あこがれて | 222,311 | 19.6% |

HiddenForm 憧憬れる
(Not sure it's even needed as a hidden form)

@@ -10,3 +10 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>憧憬れる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 瓶詰め　 │ 208,181 │ 71.4% │
│ 瓶詰　　 │  68,462 │ 23.5% │
│ 壜詰め　 │   1,755 │  0.6% │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s, meikyo)
│ 壜詰　　 │   2,608 │  0.9% │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s, koj)
│ びんづめ │  10,597 │  3.6% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

daijr koj

Alt kanji 壜詰(め), merge from 壜詰 1565810

@@ -13,0 +13,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>壜詰め</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>壜詰</keb>

daij, koj, gg5

Added sense.

@@ -20,0 +21,10 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>calm</gloss>
+<gloss>peaceful</gloss>
+<gloss>uneventful</gloss>
+<gloss>easy</gloss>
+<gloss>uncomplicated</gloss>
+<gloss>trouble-free</gloss>
+</sense>

ルミナス (has "smooth")

Better matches the (new) example sentence.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>smooth</gloss>

N-grams:
平坦	580105
へいたん	4535
平たん	14884

Prev. 平たん entry deleted.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>平たん</keb>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Works for me using the EDRDG server, so the issue is probably your browser and/or audio software.

none of the Pronunciation sounds work

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| 宝くじ　　 | 1,896,297 | 98.6% |
| 宝クジ　　 |    19,771 |  1.0% |
| 宝籤　　　 |     2,321 |  0.1% |
| 宝鬮　　　 |         0 |  0.0% |
| たからくじ |     4,641 |  0.2% |
| たからクジ |       301 |  0.0% | <- dropping restrictions

HiddenForm 宝クジ

@@ -23,3 +22,0 @@
-<re_restr>宝くじ</re_restr>
-<re_restr>宝籤</re_restr>
-<re_restr>宝鬮</re_restr>
@@ -29,4 +25,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>たからクジ</reb>
-<re_restr>宝クジ</re_restr>

宝くじ	1896297
宝クジ	19771
宝籤	2321

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

GG5, etc. 宝くじを買う buy a lottery ticket

@@ -35,0 +36,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/55060

@@ -35,0 +36 @@
+<gloss>lottery ticket</gloss>

宝鬮 not in gg5, koj, daijs
G n-grams:
 宝くじ	1896297
 宝クジ	  19771
 宝籤	   2321
 宝鬮	No matches
 たからくじ	4641
 たからクジ	 301

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+<keb>宝クジ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +22,3 @@
+<re_restr>宝くじ</re_restr>
+<re_restr>宝籤</re_restr>
+<re_restr>宝鬮</re_restr>
@@ -20,0 +28,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>たからクジ</reb>
+<re_restr>宝クジ</re_restr>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 幕開け　 │ 365,075 │ 98.2% │
│ 幕明け　 │   6,651 │  1.8% │ 🡠 maybe irregular. nikk has 幕明【まくあき】, though.
│ まくあけ │     414 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

google

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>幕明け</keb>

koj, daij

-swapping senses to match usage
-moving out the part about noh

@@ -10,2 +10,12 @@
-<keb>名宣</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>名告り</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>名のり</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>名乗</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>名告</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,6 +31,2 @@
-<gloss>name readings of kanji</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<s_inf>often 名宣 in Noh</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="2649260">名ノリ</xref>
+<gloss>giving one's name (or rank, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -32,0 +38,1 @@
+<gloss>announcement of candidacy</gloss>
@@ -34,0 +41,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>name readings of kanji</gloss>
+</sense>

http://www.nihonjiten.com/data/41455.html

Add 名宣 kanji, used pretty commonly in Noh (as in 名宣座).

@@ -8,0 +8,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>名宣</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22,0 +26,1 @@
+<s_inf>often 名宣 in Noh</s_inf>

gg5, prog

@@ -16 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>scorn</gloss>
+<gloss>scornful laughter</gloss>
+<gloss>ridicule</gloss>
+<gloss>derision</gloss>

G n-grams:
 嘲笑	193388
 ちょう笑	   463
 ちょうしょう	14970
Tanaka: 2 examples of ちょう笑

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ちょう笑</keb>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
 4,747	 29.4%	噤む
     0	  0.0%	鉗む  <- in daijr/s, koj
11,392	 70.6%	つぐむ

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>

Maybe a small qualification will do.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>rainy season (in Japan from early June to mid-July)</gloss>
+<gloss>rainy season (in Japan usu. from early June to mid-July)</gloss>

We are not an encyclopedia
We can not cover every detail
I think the entry is OK as it is

The tsuyu comes to and ends earlier in 
Okinawa/Amami (5/9-6/23 is average for 
Okinawa)

なるほど.

A more precise gloss would be "rainy season (in East Asia from May to August)", but the current gloss seems more relevant in a Japanese dictionary.

http://due-cuori-a-torino.blogspot.com.au/2010/05/blog-post_06.html  (イタリアの梅雨。)
http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/ricorico_princess/63720193.html (インドの梅雨、モンスーンの始まりはやっぱり事件からスタートでした（笑）)
Even one "オーストラリアの梅雨" hit.

I realise non-Japan application of the term is rare; I'm just making the point that there's no need to spell it out too much. The 国語s mention the period, so I suppose there's no harm.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>rainy season</gloss>
+<gloss>rainy season (in Japan from early June to mid-July)</gloss>

japanese wiki: 雨季の一種である
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Asian_rainy_season

i think the edit was mostly correct though maybe not glossed the best.  like africa and indonesia in the table here have a "rainy season", but it wouldn't normally be called 梅雨:
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/雨季

I'm not convinced.
Wikipedia, both English and Japanese, describes it as a local weather phenomenon that affects China, Japan and Korea.
I do not get any ngram hits for <country>の梅雨, except for 中国の梅雨.
The dates are taken from Wikipedia and apply to Honshu, Kyushu and Shikoku.

It's not limited to Japan - you can find <country>の梅雨 being used. No JE I have checked mentions the months.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>rainy season (from early June to mid-July)</gloss>
+<gloss>rainy season</gloss>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Asian_rainy_season

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>rainy season</gloss>
+<gloss>rainy season (from early June to mid-July)</gloss>

if first reading is supposed to be most common, it should have the news reading tags

@@ -16,0 +16,2 @@
+<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>nf13</re_pri>
@@ -20,2 +22,0 @@
-<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf13</re_pri>

GG5

alt. glosses – literal emphasis is “in one step”
(used in class, with that nuance)

@@ -21,0 +21,2 @@
+<gloss>making a killing</gloss>
+<gloss>making a fortune at a single stroke</gloss>

There is an issue open on ～もの/～もん entries, so there's no need to keep this edit open.

I agree it's a shame it makes the entry a little unsightly but I don't think the reading かいもん should be [hidden] away (but I wouldn't mind a tag like that applied to 買いもの；買いもん)

買い物	68063816	99.6%
買いもの	268422	        0.4%
買いもん	14236	        0.0%
---
考え物	71000
考えもん	9874    <- not in jmdict
比べ物	297511
比べもん	5424    <- not in jmdict
馬鹿者	91293
馬鹿もん	2534    <- not in jmdict
売り物	413791
売りもん	2456    <- not in jmdict

I can see the argument for keeping かいもん on this entry (as it's not really a separate word) but I don't like that it introduces unsightly restriction tags (if 買いもの and 買いもん are included as surface forms).
I think this is another illustration of how "hidden" readings/surface forms could be very useful. It would allow us to include -もん forms on other -物/-者 entries without adding any restr tags. I'd argue that even the reading doesn't need to be visible; what matters is that a -もん search takes you to the right entry.

OK, I'll put it back the way it was before the split. We can't have 買いもの/かいもん as a pair, and I'm not throwing away 買いもん.

@@ -16,0 +17,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>買いもん</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -18,0 +22,3 @@
+<re_restr>買い物</re_restr>
+<re_restr>買物</re_restr>
+<re_restr>買いもの</re_restr>
@@ -24,0 +31,3 @@
+<re_restr>買い物</re_restr>
+<re_restr>買物</re_restr>
+<re_restr>買いもん</re_restr>

https://www.1101.com/job_study/iwata/2008-04-17.html
安心して「バカもん！」と言える人と、
腫れ物に触るように
叱らないといけない人がいるんですよね。
(interview w Iwata, former CEO of Nintendo)

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/人気もん!
『人気もん!』（にんきもん）は、2005年4月3日から2012年3月18日まで、テレビ新広島の制作により、FNS中国地方ブロックネットで放送されていたドキュメントバラエティ番組である。

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/似せ者/
daijs+ にせもん【似せ者】 の解説
松井今朝子の短編の時代小説。
(にせもん is also in our 偽物 entry)

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/この家は売りもんではない。
tatoeba example: この家は売りもんではない。
This house is not for sale.

https://japan-indepth.jp/?p=64397
橋下氏も橋下氏で、ある学者の容姿を「安もんのヒトラー」などと形容したことがあるが、これは相手が先に自分をヒトラーに例えたことへの「言い返し」だと明言している。
(Hashimoto did write "yasumon" not "yasumono" on his twitter but you can find plenty of newspapers etc. using the kanji 安物 to quote him, i.e. https://www.tokyo-sports.co.jp/social/politics/468849/ )

I guess we haven't formulated an official rule on these, but the previous discussion was on this particular entry (and on a deleted 買いもん entry). かいもん is spoken language. it might seem rare in the ngrams because people don't write it out with much frequency, yet will still pronounce 買い物 as かいもん. It's super common in Kansai and probably all or most other western Japanese dialects as well (博多通りもん for example is one of FUkuoka's most famous omiyagegashi), and probably in parts of eastern Japan and even Hokkaido too. 物/者 can in many (if not all) commonly used constructions be pronounced もん. I think we should include it in more entries to demonstrate this. I don't think we should split them out because they are really just a different way to pronunciate the same word and as such they meet our 2/3 guideline.

@@ -21,0 +22,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かいもん</reb>

買い物	68063816
買いもの	268422
かいもの	238334
買いもん	14236
かいもん	13489

I thought we were doing them on a case-by-case basis, and given the expressed interest in decluttering having two simpler entries didn't seem a bad move. I'd like to see the impact of similar handling of other 物 and 者 cases before attempting a general rule on ...もん forms.
Of course, we could just have かいもん as a [nokanji] reading, but that ignores that 買いもん seems to be slightly more common (and かいもん could also be referring to 海門 and 開門). With that many counts in the n-grams, I certainly wouldn't want 買いもん thrown away.

We've discussed this previously - I don't think -もん forms should be split off but kept with もの's, or each and every 物 and 者 entry could have a doppelganger もん entry (not that we include -もん readings in all of them, but we certainly could and probably should include them in more). I also think that we don't need to record the kanji surface form "買いもん" at all, and I don't think we actually need to include a note saying "かいもん is col". It's not as かいもの is a particularly formal word to begin with.

Yes. Done.

@@ -17,3 +16,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>買いもん</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -22,3 +18,0 @@
-<re_restr>買い物</re_restr>
-<re_restr>買物</re_restr>
-<re_restr>買いもの</re_restr>
@@ -28,6 +21,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かいもん</reb>
-<re_restr>買い物</re_restr>
-<re_restr>買物</re_restr>
-<re_restr>買いもん</re_restr>
@@ -39 +26,0 @@
-<s_inf>かいもん is colloquial</s_inf>

Would it not be better to have a separate col-tagged かいもん entry? I'm not sure it's worth cluttering the entry just to accommodate a significantly less common reading.

mk

@@ -38 +38,2 @@
-<s_inf>買いもん is colloquial</s_inf>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<s_inf>かいもん is colloquial</s_inf>

Not sure if かいもん applies to 買い物 and 買物, but it's definitely not 買いもの

@@ -30,0 +31,3 @@
+<re_restr>買い物</re_restr>
+<re_restr>買物</re_restr>
+<re_restr>買いもん</re_restr>

買い物	68063816
買物	4614770
買いもの	268422
買いもん	14236

It's so comparatively rare that I doubt it's worth mentioning.

"col." isn't the most obvious abbreviation.

@@ -35 +35 @@
-<s_inf>買いもん is col.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>買いもん is colloquial</s_inf>

買いもの	268422

@@ -14,0 +15,3 @@
+<keb>買いもの</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -20,0 +24 @@
+<re_restr>買いもの</re_restr>

NVm, should have actually checked the kokugos.

Except for slang/colloquial terms, I think 
we've decided (in the recent past) NOT to tag 
things that 1) aren't marked as vs in the 
kokugos, 2) are more commonly "-をする"

daijr, daijs, meikyo, gakken, smk
買い物に行く	234071
買い物をする	855570
買い物する	377651

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

I'll approve it for now. If anybosy objects, 
they can re-open it.

買いもん	14236
買い物	68063816
買物	4614770
かいもの	238334
かいもん	13489

OK, putting it back, and removing the draft 買いもん entry.

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>買いもん</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -15,0 +19,2 @@
+<re_restr>買い物</re_restr>
+<re_restr>買物</re_restr>
@@ -19,0 +25,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かいもん</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -21,0 +30 @@
+<s_inf>買いもん is col.</s_inf>

I agree かいもん probably shouldn't be here. I've proposed a split.

@@ -20,3 +19,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かいもん</reb>
-</r_ele>

I'm not sure if including these sorts of dialectal readings is a good idea.
Wouldn't we have to be consistent with all -物 entries?

Since nobody has protested...
I think 買いもん is too rare to be worth 
recording (esp. as it'll be rather messy). I 
can see why it's unusual too as the IME isn't 
helpful at all when you type かいもん (開門、海
門、会モン、etc.)

@@ -19,0 +20,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かいもん</reb>
+</r_ele>

鍋物	179878
なべもの	4030
鍋もん	1374
なべもん	567
買いもん	14236
買もん	78
買い物	68063816
買物	4614770
かいもの	238334
かいもん	13489

Scary prospect, but it seems that  買いもん, etc. are common enough to record somewhere.

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail
/q144851974
"買い物←「かいもん」って言います？

私は『「かいもん」行って来るわ』って言うんだけど・・・。
みなさんはどちらですか？

「かいもん」って関西弁？？"
"地域、人によって「もの」が「もん」になまるのではないでしょう
か。
私は大阪人ですが「物」「者」はよく「もん」と言います。 例え
ば、
食べ物 たべもん
生もの なまもん
青物 あおもん
果物 くだもん
鍋物 なべもん
飲み物 のみもん
着る物 きるもん
履く物 はくもん
品物 しなもん
色物 いろもん
上物 じょうもん
安物 やすもん
本物 ほんもん
偽物 にせもん
瀬戸物 せともん
輸入物 ゆにゅうもん
翻訳物 ほんやくもん
書いた物 かいたもん
出来た物 できたもん

ほめる者 ほめるもん
笑う者 わらうもん
喜ぶ者 よろこぶもん
怒る者 おこるもん
泣く者 なくもん
悲しむ者 かなしむもん
よそ者 よそもん
筋者 すじもん
横着者 おうちゃくもん
極道者 ごくどうもん
馬鹿者 ばかもん"
"名古屋出身の者です。
”かいもん”って使ってましたよ．"
"「もの(mono)」が省略された、または転訛して「もん(mon)」にな
っているだけでしょう。
方言であるとは一概には言えないように思います。また、上品か下品
かなんて比べようとする(または、決めつけようとする)人って、心が
狭いと思いますが。

「物」だけでなく「者」も「もん」になります。
悪者→わるもん
・・・他にもいっぱいありそうですね。"
"大分寄り、山口寄り、の福岡県に住んでますが、
「かいもん」って言います。
多分、関西に限らず使ってる地域は結構あるのではないでしょう
か？"

Do we want to record this pronunciation? There's a whole 
lot of -者/-物 entries we could add -もん readings to if we 
wanted.
Also don't believe this is an adj-no.

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

HiddenForm 買いもの；買いもん
(Marcus suggested that かいもん not be hidden)

There is an issue open on ～もの/～もん entries, so there's no need to keep this edit open.

I agree it's a shame it makes the entry a little unsightly but I don't think the reading かいもん should be [hidden] away (but I wouldn't mind a tag like that applied to 買いもの；買いもん)

買い物	68063816	99.6%
買いもの	268422	        0.4%
買いもん	14236	        0.0%
---
考え物	71000
考えもん	9874    <- not in jmdict
比べ物	297511
比べもん	5424    <- not in jmdict
馬鹿者	91293
馬鹿もん	2534    <- not in jmdict
売り物	413791
売りもん	2456    <- not in jmdict

I can see the argument for keeping かいもん on this entry (as it's not really a separate word) but I don't like that it introduces unsightly restriction tags (if 買いもの and 買いもん are included as surface forms).
I think this is another illustration of how "hidden" readings/surface forms could be very useful. It would allow us to include -もん forms on other -物/-者 entries without adding any restr tags. I'd argue that even the reading doesn't need to be visible; what matters is that a -もん search takes you to the right entry.

OK, I'll put it back the way it was before the split. We can't have 買いもの/かいもん as a pair, and I'm not throwing away 買いもん.

@@ -16,0 +17,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>買いもん</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -18,0 +22,3 @@
+<re_restr>買い物</re_restr>
+<re_restr>買物</re_restr>
+<re_restr>買いもの</re_restr>
@@ -24,0 +31,3 @@
+<re_restr>買い物</re_restr>
+<re_restr>買物</re_restr>
+<re_restr>買いもん</re_restr>

https://www.1101.com/job_study/iwata/2008-04-17.html
安心して「バカもん！」と言える人と、
腫れ物に触るように
叱らないといけない人がいるんですよね。
(interview w Iwata, former CEO of Nintendo)

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/人気もん!
『人気もん!』（にんきもん）は、2005年4月3日から2012年3月18日まで、テレビ新広島の制作により、FNS中国地方ブロックネットで放送されていたドキュメントバラエティ番組である。

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/似せ者/
daijs+ にせもん【似せ者】 の解説
松井今朝子の短編の時代小説。
(にせもん is also in our 偽物 entry)

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/この家は売りもんではない。
tatoeba example: この家は売りもんではない。
This house is not for sale.

https://japan-indepth.jp/?p=64397
橋下氏も橋下氏で、ある学者の容姿を「安もんのヒトラー」などと形容したことがあるが、これは相手が先に自分をヒトラーに例えたことへの「言い返し」だと明言している。
(Hashimoto did write "yasumon" not "yasumono" on his twitter but you can find plenty of newspapers etc. using the kanji 安物 to quote him, i.e. https://www.tokyo-sports.co.jp/social/politics/468849/ )

I guess we haven't formulated an official rule on these, but the previous discussion was on this particular entry (and on a deleted 買いもん entry). かいもん is spoken language. it might seem rare in the ngrams because people don't write it out with much frequency, yet will still pronounce 買い物 as かいもん. It's super common in Kansai and probably all or most other western Japanese dialects as well (博多通りもん for example is one of FUkuoka's most famous omiyagegashi), and probably in parts of eastern Japan and even Hokkaido too. 物/者 can in many (if not all) commonly used constructions be pronounced もん. I think we should include it in more entries to demonstrate this. I don't think we should split them out because they are really just a different way to pronunciate the same word and as such they meet our 2/3 guideline.

@@ -21,0 +22,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かいもん</reb>

買い物	68063816
買いもの	268422
かいもの	238334
買いもん	14236
かいもん	13489

I thought we were doing them on a case-by-case basis, and given the expressed interest in decluttering having two simpler entries didn't seem a bad move. I'd like to see the impact of similar handling of other 物 and 者 cases before attempting a general rule on ...もん forms.
Of course, we could just have かいもん as a [nokanji] reading, but that ignores that 買いもん seems to be slightly more common (and かいもん could also be referring to 海門 and 開門). With that many counts in the n-grams, I certainly wouldn't want 買いもん thrown away.

We've discussed this previously - I don't think -もん forms should be split off but kept with もの's, or each and every 物 and 者 entry could have a doppelganger もん entry (not that we include -もん readings in all of them, but we certainly could and probably should include them in more). I also think that we don't need to record the kanji surface form "買いもん" at all, and I don't think we actually need to include a note saying "かいもん is col". It's not as かいもの is a particularly formal word to begin with.

Yes. Done.

@@ -17,3 +16,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>買いもん</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -22,3 +18,0 @@
-<re_restr>買い物</re_restr>
-<re_restr>買物</re_restr>
-<re_restr>買いもの</re_restr>
@@ -28,6 +21,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かいもん</reb>
-<re_restr>買い物</re_restr>
-<re_restr>買物</re_restr>
-<re_restr>買いもん</re_restr>
@@ -39 +26,0 @@
-<s_inf>かいもん is colloquial</s_inf>

Would it not be better to have a separate col-tagged かいもん entry? I'm not sure it's worth cluttering the entry just to accommodate a significantly less common reading.

mk

@@ -38 +38,2 @@
-<s_inf>買いもん is colloquial</s_inf>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<s_inf>かいもん is colloquial</s_inf>

Not sure if かいもん applies to 買い物 and 買物, but it's definitely not 買いもの

@@ -30,0 +31,3 @@
+<re_restr>買い物</re_restr>
+<re_restr>買物</re_restr>
+<re_restr>買いもん</re_restr>

買い物	68063816
買物	4614770
買いもの	268422
買いもん	14236

It's so comparatively rare that I doubt it's worth mentioning.

"col." isn't the most obvious abbreviation.

@@ -35 +35 @@
-<s_inf>買いもん is col.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>買いもん is colloquial</s_inf>

買いもの	268422

@@ -14,0 +15,3 @@
+<keb>買いもの</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -20,0 +24 @@
+<re_restr>買いもの</re_restr>

NVm, should have actually checked the kokugos.

Except for slang/colloquial terms, I think 
we've decided (in the recent past) NOT to tag 
things that 1) aren't marked as vs in the 
kokugos, 2) are more commonly "-をする"

daijr, daijs, meikyo, gakken, smk
買い物に行く	234071
買い物をする	855570
買い物する	377651

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

I'll approve it for now. If anybosy objects, 
they can re-open it.

買いもん	14236
買い物	68063816
買物	4614770
かいもの	238334
かいもん	13489

OK, putting it back, and removing the draft 買いもん entry.

@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>買いもん</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -15,0 +19,2 @@
+<re_restr>買い物</re_restr>
+<re_restr>買物</re_restr>
@@ -19,0 +25,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かいもん</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -21,0 +30 @@
+<s_inf>買いもん is col.</s_inf>

I agree かいもん probably shouldn't be here. I've proposed a split.

@@ -20,3 +19,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かいもん</reb>
-</r_ele>

I'm not sure if including these sorts of dialectal readings is a good idea.
Wouldn't we have to be consistent with all -物 entries?

Since nobody has protested...
I think 買いもん is too rare to be worth 
recording (esp. as it'll be rather messy). I 
can see why it's unusual too as the IME isn't 
helpful at all when you type かいもん (開門、海
門、会モン、etc.)

@@ -19,0 +20,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かいもん</reb>
+</r_ele>

鍋物	179878
なべもの	4030
鍋もん	1374
なべもん	567
買いもん	14236
買もん	78
買い物	68063816
買物	4614770
かいもの	238334
かいもん	13489

Scary prospect, but it seems that  買いもん, etc. are common enough to record somewhere.

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail
/q144851974
"買い物←「かいもん」って言います？

私は『「かいもん」行って来るわ』って言うんだけど・・・。
みなさんはどちらですか？

「かいもん」って関西弁？？"
"地域、人によって「もの」が「もん」になまるのではないでしょう
か。
私は大阪人ですが「物」「者」はよく「もん」と言います。 例え
ば、
食べ物 たべもん
生もの なまもん
青物 あおもん
果物 くだもん
鍋物 なべもん
飲み物 のみもん
着る物 きるもん
履く物 はくもん
品物 しなもん
色物 いろもん
上物 じょうもん
安物 やすもん
本物 ほんもん
偽物 にせもん
瀬戸物 せともん
輸入物 ゆにゅうもん
翻訳物 ほんやくもん
書いた物 かいたもん
出来た物 できたもん

ほめる者 ほめるもん
笑う者 わらうもん
喜ぶ者 よろこぶもん
怒る者 おこるもん
泣く者 なくもん
悲しむ者 かなしむもん
よそ者 よそもん
筋者 すじもん
横着者 おうちゃくもん
極道者 ごくどうもん
馬鹿者 ばかもん"
"名古屋出身の者です。
”かいもん”って使ってましたよ．"
"「もの(mono)」が省略された、または転訛して「もん(mon)」にな
っているだけでしょう。
方言であるとは一概には言えないように思います。また、上品か下品
かなんて比べようとする(または、決めつけようとする)人って、心が
狭いと思いますが。

「物」だけでなく「者」も「もん」になります。
悪者→わるもん
・・・他にもいっぱいありそうですね。"
"大分寄り、山口寄り、の福岡県に住んでますが、
「かいもん」って言います。
多分、関西に限らず使ってる地域は結構あるのではないでしょう
か？"

Do we want to record this pronunciation? There's a whole 
lot of -者/-物 entries we could add -もん readings to if we 
wanted.
Also don't believe this is an adj-no.

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

GG5
1,310,000 虎視眈々
  991,000 虎視眈眈

* Reorder pos – gloss is adv-to, not adj-t, and more commonly used as と (dict examples are all と)
* Reorder kanji to most common order
* Add alt gloss “[with an] eagle eye” is most idiomatic in English
(Saw on restaurant name, http://www.koshitan.com/ )

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>虎視眈眈</keb>
+<keb>虎視眈々</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<keb>虎視眈々</keb>
+<keb>虎視眈眈</keb>
@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -15,2 +16,2 @@
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
-<gloss>watching vigilantly for an opportunity to prey upon</gloss>
+<gloss>(watching) vigilantly for an opportunity to prey upon</gloss>
+<gloss>with an eagle eye</gloss>

Nikkoku never includes okurigana in headwords (i.e. it doesn't even have the 抜け道 form). Similarly, Shinmeikai always includes a form without okurigana, regardless of whether it's used or not. I don't have access to Oukoko or Iwakoku but I suspect they have the same policy. We typically use Daijrin and Daijisen as a guide to what forms are standard/irregular; in this case, neither of them has 抜道.

Is it irregular, though? shinmeikai, nikkoku, oukoku, and iwakoku have it.

nikkoku also has 抜路, which is just about as common as 抜け路

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
175,893	 95.9%	抜け道
  1,202	  0.7%	抜道
    128	  0.1%	抜け路
     72	  0.0%	抜路
  6,038	  3.3%	ぬけみち

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<keb>抜道</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +14,4 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>抜路</keb>

gg5, ルミナス

I think we can drop 抜道. Irregular and uncommon.

@@ -8,4 +7,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>抜道</keb>
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -27,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>shortcut</gloss>
@@ -32,0 +30 @@
+<gloss>way out (of trouble)</gloss>

抜け路 (ぬけみち) is in daijs

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
175,893	 96.0%	抜け道
  1,202	  0.7%	抜道
    128	  0.1%	抜け路
  6,038	  3.3%	ぬけみち

@@ -10 +10,2 @@
-<keb>抜け路</keb>
+<keb>抜道</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,2 +14,2 @@
-<keb>抜道</keb>
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<keb>抜け路</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog, nc

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<keb>抜け路</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +14,1 @@
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -19,0 +23,8 @@
+<gloss>byway</gloss>
+<gloss>bypath</gloss>
+<gloss>byroad</gloss>
+<gloss>secret path</gloss>
+<gloss>way of escape</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +32,1 @@
+<gloss>excuse</gloss>

I don't think "loophole" completely captures the meaning of this word.  It also can mean more of a generic "a way out (of someplace or something)", perhaps with a connotation of cleverness or secrecy.  In ordinary use, I only ever hear "loophole" in reference to a contract or similar agreement, but I've seen "抜け道" used to denote an exit, secret passage, etc.

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

It's not even in the main JIS X 0208 standard, but in the supplementary JIS X 0212. I think the Asahi was quotong it rather than using it.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

Used in Asahi Shimbun so probably not oK?
https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASL2H4Q6XL2HUTIL02C.html
"国民の成人年齢を１８歳に引き下げる民法改正案に伴い、天皇や皇
太子の成人を１８歳と定めた皇室典範の規定を削除する案を政府が自
民党に示したところ、「皇室への冒瀆（ぼうとく）だ」と激しい反発
を受けている。"

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

ngrams

Reordering and removing [uk]

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>冒涜</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11,2 @@
-<keb>冒涜</keb>
+<keb>冒瀆</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,4 +16,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>冒瀆</keb>
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

Did we reach a conclusion on the adjective vs. noun glosses debate? I think we should stick with noun glosses here.

憂鬱な	338669	
憂鬱に	153957	
憂鬱です	 94586 
憂鬱だ	 53050
...
憂鬱と	 29038	    
憂鬱を	 26747	  
憂鬱が	 24618

-> adj glosses

@@ -33 +33 @@
-<gloss>depression</gloss>
+<gloss>depressing</gloss>
@@ -35,2 +35,2 @@
-<gloss>dejection</gloss>
-<gloss>gloom</gloss>
+<gloss>dismal</gloss>
+<gloss>gloomy</gloss>

G n-grams
憂鬱	3241042
憂うつ	  53413
憂欝	  15679
悒鬱	    169
幽鬱	     71
幽欝	     61
悒欝	No matches
ゆううつ	  65035

reordering

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+<keb>憂うつ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -12 +15 @@
-<keb>憂うつ</keb>
+<keb>悒鬱</keb>
@@ -19,3 +21,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>悒鬱</keb>

Daijr too.

daijr

@@ -23,0 +23,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>悒欝</keb>
+</k_ele>

daijs

@@ -20,0 +20,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>悒鬱</keb>
+</k_ele>

Daijirin

Merging in 1819140. Ordering on hits.

@@ -9,3 +9,0 @@
-<keb>幽欝</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +13,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>幽鬱</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>幽欝</keb>

Probably not written, but Daijisen has for 御披露目 "「お広め」の意". and Nikk quotes "「家来の方にまだお広めも無く」". I think it's OK as a search-only term.

Do we have any evidence that お披露目 is ever written as お広め? I'm not seeing anything in the n-grams. The top term is お広めのお部屋, where お広め clearly doesn't mean "unveiling"/"debut".

Adding sK/sk forms.

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>お広め</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

HiddenForm お広め

see previous comments

@@ -10,7 +9,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>お広め</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>御広目</keb>

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daijs has "〔「お広め」の意". Should お広め really be included as a kanji?
g ng

お披露目	747111
御披露目	11852
お広め	1943
御広目	No matches

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

meikyo, etc.

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<misc>&pol;</misc>

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>introduction</gloss>

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>unveiling</gloss>

ハト派	22757	96.2%
鳩派	840	3.6%
はと派	50	0.2%

hiddenform はと派.

@@ -10,7 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>はと派</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ハトは</reb>
-<re_restr>ハト派</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
@@ -19,2 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>鳩派</re_restr>
-<re_restr>はと派</re_restr>
@@ -25,3 +16,4 @@
-<gloss>dove</gloss>
-<gloss>moderate</gloss>
-<gloss>soft-liner</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1684470">タカ派</xref>
+<gloss>doves</gloss>
+<gloss>moderates</gloss>
+<gloss>soft-liners</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, ngrams.

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>はと派</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -17,0 +20,1 @@
+<re_restr>はと派</re_restr>
@@ -20,1 +24,4 @@
-<gloss>doves</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1684470">タカ派・タカは</xref>
+<gloss>dove</gloss>
+<gloss>moderate</gloss>

About 30 years too late to do that as so many systems and apps assume the options are fully 
described. You really meant 引(き/)(篭/籠/こ)(も/)り

Might be nice if there was some syntax you could use to define multiple forms 
in a single statement. eg 引(き/)(篭/籠)(も/)り

can get tedious trying to manually type out each combo to check in ngrams etc

@@ -45 +45 @@
-<gloss>people who withdraw from society</gloss>
+<gloss>person who has withdrawn from society</gloss>

I think the comment is a bit misleading.
(e.g. to the bedroom in the parent's home)
might be better, but we could maybe just skip the comment

@@ -45 +45 @@
-<gloss>people who withdraw from society (e.g. retire to the country)</gloss>
+<gloss>people who withdraw from society</gloss>

I think so. The dictionaries really only have sense 2, but there are plenty of examples of it being used to refer to the person as well as the syndrome.

Should we have two separate senses?

wiki

I think "hikikomori" has got enough presence in English now to be a gloss.

@@ -42,2 +42,3 @@
-<gloss>a shut-in</gloss>
-<gloss>a stay-at-home</gloss>
+<gloss>shut-in</gloss>
+<gloss>stay-at-home</gloss>
+<gloss>hikikomori</gloss>

Yes, better than strict ordering.