I sometimes check twitter for mentions of jmdict/jisho and I've noticed that this entry frequently comes up for discussion. It's apparent there's a sizable contingent of anime/manga fans who are into "lolicon content" that are adamant that being sexually attracted to prepubescent girls is a completely different thing from pedophilia. I don't know anything about Kevin in particular and am certainly not accusing him of anything, but I think we need to be aware there are a lot of people online who are very strongly opposed to "ロリコン" being defined as "pedophile" solely because it makes them feel personally attacked. Here's an example of a recent (June 24) Twitter thread where you can see how this usually plays out: https://twitter.com/COEofTypo/status/1539386476537970689 (there's a lot of replies but here's one that leads into this discussion of our definition as it appeared at the time on Jisho: https://twitter.com/ElFazendobarra/status/1539858524548632576 )

The argument that people on Twitter are making (that it seems Kevin is similarly arguing for) is that "ロリコン" should not be translated as "pedophile" because there are other words in Japanese that are also translated as "pedophilia/pedophile" and there is a distinction between those words (ペドフィリア/小児性愛 etc.) and ロリコン. While this is no doubt true, that it's only ロリコン that is used self-referentially, this doesn't mean that glosses like "male pedophile" or "male pedophilia" don't also belong here. We are not only concerned with getting the nuance right but also conveying the actual meaning of the word. Kevin changed "male pedophilia" to "sexual attraction to young girls" and "male pedophile" to "male with such an attraction", but are these really closer in nuance and meaning to ロリコン or just wordier and wafflier ways of saying the exact same things? That's a rhetorical question - it's obvious to me its the latter. It's hairsplitting. Look up the definitions of "pedophile" and "pedophilia" in any English dictionary. Notice also that ALL the kokugo definitions for ロリコン mention "性欲" - that an otaku-dominated wiki site like pixiv disagrees ("特別な感情" is what they call it) seems entirely irrelevant to me. This isn't a case of "Western bias", it's a case of looking at reliable sources instead of user-generated content.

I agree that "lolicon" rather than "male pedophile" should lead, for nuance etc. reasons, but that word will be meaningless to a lot of people, so we need to also include glosses that pithily explain what this actually means. We always strive for the most economical definitions so why exactly is it that we shouldn't call a spade a spade here?

Another point about the other reference Kevin posted is a blog post written by a person calling himself "初老のオタ" and the argument he is making is that ロリコン IS in fact used to refer to male pedophiles/pedophilia in Japanese media but that he finds this usage "wrong" because he has personally somewhat convolutedly decided that a "ロリコン" is somebody who is "sexually or romantically attracted to underage girls but doesn't necessarily want to act on it in real life" and that a ペド on the other hand is somebody whose "ultimate purpose" (最終目的) is to have sex with underage girls:

"ロリコン、ペド、チャイルド・マレスター……
これらの違いが曖昧な日本ならではの報道だなぁと。
...
少女・幼女に対し性的嗜好や恋愛感情を持つ事で、
最終的目標が性交の有無であるか否かは関係ありません。
...
●ロリは必ずしも性交を最終目的とはしておらず、
　ペドは性交を最終目的としている。"

We should really not be concerned with what "otaku purists" consider the correct use of the word (which by the way still would translate into "male pedophile" in English) but with how it's actually used in mainstream Japanese society. For more on that, see the multiple links I've previously posted.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<s_inf>oft. used self-referentially</s_inf>
@@ -12,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>(often sexual) attraction to young girls</gloss>
-<gloss>male (sexually) attracted to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>

I missed this, apologies. Kevin, welcome to JMDict. We always appreciate input on definitions but the multiple accusations of "cultural ignorance", "Western bias", "chauvinism", "strangeness" and  "glibness" are not at all appropriate and if you wish to continue participating in the discussion on how we should define this word, I would hope you would afford other editors more respect than you've done so far. I've changed "male with _such_ an attraction" to "male (sexually) attracted to young girls" because style-wise, we try to avoid glosses that explicitly refer to previous ones. I don't have time right now but I will try and revisit this at a later date as I'm not sure I fully agree with the changes made.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>a male with such an attraction</gloss>
+<gloss>male (sexually) attracted to young girls</gloss>

Hmm. I guess this covers Marcus' view on  "male pedophile" and "male pedophilia" references.

Kevin's case and amendments seem sound but I'd like to see Marcus's response before approving.

日本の場合、ロリコンとペドフィリアが混同され、日常語としての「ペドフィリア」は、ロリコンに比べて病的・犯罪的ニュアンスを伴って使用される場合が多い。(wiki)

現在では幼い少女を性的に好んでいる人のことを指して使われることが多いが、本来ロリータ・コンプレックスとは性的な意味合いは薄く、（異性愛の）女性がロリータ・コンプレックスであるということも大いにありえる。本来は対象は「美」少女に限らない。(pixiv)

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/ロリコン

A whole blog post on the subject:
http://yamatoasuka02.blog.fc2.com/blog-entry-762.html?sp

Video series on the topic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=lETPaGnl2aI&ab_channel=PauseandSelect

Many of the references given by others below, despite their intentions, clearly imply a distinction between the concepts of lolicon and pedophilia. Some of them, such as the Wiki quote, literally state that they are different concepts. Despite this, this same reference was somehow used to justify including the gloss of "pedophile"? Truly strange, and obviously Western bias.

The pixiv article clearly states that lolicon is not necessarily sexual, which is not something that can be said about the different concept of pedophilia. Indeed, the very fact that "pedophilia" has entered the Japanese lexicon in katakana implies a core difference.

The blog article I provide underscores the fact that this is, at best, a debated topic. The current entry glibly sides with one side of this "debate" in a way that is unscholarly. Japan has a big cultural preference for the young and 未熟, and understanding that at a deep level is essential to understanding why it's inappropriate to glibly label lolicon to be pedophilia.

Honestly, they are quite obviously similar but different concepts, and it's culturally ignorant and chauvinistic to include this gloss.

@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>sexual attraction to young girls</gloss>
-<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>
-<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>
+<gloss>(often sexual) attraction to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>a male with such an attraction</gloss>

https://nikkan-spa.jp/1481525
小児性愛は病気なのか？人口の5％いる彼らの犯罪を防ぐには
さらに、週刊誌報道によると、「中学生時代は遊び相手といえば小さな子どもだった」「いつも小さな子にベタベタと接する」といった記事もあり、今回の事件もいわゆる「ロリコン」――小児性愛者による犯
罪で、しかも、再犯だったと見られる。
...
まず、「ロリコン」とも言われる小児性愛は“病気”なのだろうか？
this article treats ロリコン as a colloquial term for 小児性愛者/小児性愛 (pedophile/pedophilia)

https://www.kadokawa.co.jp/product/301509001364/
"幼児性愛病者（ロリコン）の魔法を完全に解くことができず、10歳の子供と18歳の大人姿の二重生活をしながら王宮に勤めるリーフィア。"
as does this one

https://www.cocolabo.me/loli-com/
"世の中には社会的に認められない欲望というものがあります。その中の一つとして割とメジャーなものが「子どもへの性的欲求」いわゆる「ロリコン」です。
精神医学的には、13歳以下の子どもへ性的欲求を持つことを「幼児性愛」（ペドフェリア）と呼びます。（参考：小児性愛障害-MSDマニュアル）"
and this one

https://www.mag2.com/p/money/1076497
"ロリコン犯罪の温床「性的同意年齢13歳」をすぐに引き上げよ。親の貧困化とSNSも要因、少年少女の性暴力被害者増加＝鈴木傾城"

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/195397d3006e3ef705118829b4e31f779a8068eb
《少女わいせつ》前科3犯・ロリコン容疑者の卑劣な手口と、実母が涙で語る“性依存の闇”
"すでに仕事を引退し、いまは農業を営む両親。40歳近くにもなって自立せず、性犯罪を繰り返すロリコン息子についてどう考えているのか。"
　"改めて翌日、自宅にいる母親を訪ねてみた。すると、
「本当にすみません……。もうどうしていいのか……。息子は完全に（性犯罪の）依存症です……」"

https://www.excite.co.jp/news/article/Tocana_201805_post_16895/
週刊誌記者によると「自宅へのガサ入れで幼児性愛者である証拠品が押収されたとの情報もある。やはりロリコンの線は消せない」という。

https://friday.kodansha.co.jp/article/10174
新潟少女殺害死体遺棄事件 「ロリコン性欲者」小林遼容疑者野放し

https://bunshun.jp/articles/-/29765
子どもへの性加害は「平均週2～3回」小児性犯罪者のすさまじい実態
「そりゃセックスもしましたよ。恋人同士ですもん。それを周りの人たちが、ぶち壊したんです。私がロリコンで、Yちゃんは被害者だといって引き離したんです。
　私はそんな人達によって犯罪者にさせられました。おかしいのはどっちだっていいたいです……」
　これは、12歳の少女に性加害をした49歳の男性の言葉である。

https://somec.org/activity2012.html
"「小児性愛は日本では『ロリコン』など好みの一種とされ、治療が受けにくい状況だ。治せる疾患という認識を社会が共有し、加害者をなくす道を広げるべきだ」と話す。"

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/11ef2d546dd9c5be5d70e3a7eb861825eaed35de
3月場所中「16歳の少女」になりすまし11歳女児を…ロリコン力士の巧妙かつ卑劣な手口

https://dot.asahi.com/webdoku/2017060700082.html
ロリコン大国ニッポン 「アメリカだったら児童ポルノ扱い」

jawiki:ペドフィリア
日本の場合、ロリコンとペドフィリアが混同され、日常語としての「ペドフィリア」は、ロリコンに比べて病的・犯罪的ニュアンスを伴って使用される場合が多い。

https://www.police.pref.wakayama.lg.jp/01_anzen/syonen/kanren/index.html
児童ポルノとは、児童（18歳未満の少年。以下同じ。）を性欲の対象にした、児童のわいせつな画像(写真や動画など)のことをいいます。世間では、「ロリコン」といった呼び方で、児童ポルノを成人向けア
ダルト製品と見る風潮があります。しかしその本質は、児童に対する性犯罪・性的虐待の記録にほかなりません。
Here's a page from the Wakayama Prefectrual police explicitly saying that "lolicon" is the same thing as child pornography.



https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/answerman/2019-08-09/.149914
English language discussion where a manga translator suggests "pedophile" can't be the correct translation for ロリコン because the word "ペドファイル" (a pretty rare word 
in Japanese) exists. I disagree.


Daijs: "幼女・少女にのみ性欲を感じる異常心理"
Daijr: "性愛の対象を少女にのみ求める心理"
Koj: "性的対象として少女・幼女を愛すること。"
Shinjirin: "性愛の対象を少女にのみ求める心理。"
Nikk: "男性が、性愛の対象として少女に偏執すること。"

I think it's remiss to not include the glosses "male pedophile" and "male pedophilia". It's obvious that in Japan, this is how the word is used.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>person attracted to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>

Reopen.

Perhaps this addresses Marcus' point? I'll approve and reopen.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>attraction to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>sexual attraction to young girls</gloss>

Chanced upon this headline just now:
少女買春ロリコン大富豪のジェフリー・エプスタイン逮
捕で新世界秩序の予定が狂う!? 陰謀の世界が大混乱… 
モサドが全方位で暗躍中！

daijr: 性愛の対象を少女にのみ求める心理。
nikk:男性が、性愛の対象として少女に偏執すること。
daijs: 幼女・少女にのみ性欲を感じる異常心理。

I agree 1 sense is actually better, but 
the previous glosses "male pedophile" and 
"male sexually attracted to prepubescent 
girls" align much closer with what's in 
the kokugos. The new glosses on the other 
hand skip out on the "性愛／性欲” part 
(which is in all 3 kokugos) and on the "男
性が、” in nikk. So I don't see how that's 
an improvement.

reopen

english wikipedia

i don't think it's sexist, but i agree that it's too limited.  also, i don't think it's two senses.  we usually put the person in together with the action, etc.

i'm temp approving because i think the existing entry is clearly not right

the proposed "definition" is not appropriate for a japanese-english dictionary

@@ -9,7 +8,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>lolicon</gloss>
-<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>
-<gloss>male sexually attracted to prepubescent girls</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -19 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>
+<gloss>attraction to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>person attracted to young girls</gloss>

The definition of "lolicon" is 
problematic, and I'd like to persuade you 
to update it since it is misinformation 
and sexist.

The definition erroneously uses the 
definition of male paedophile. A 
paedophile is the attraction to 
prepubescent individuals, and pedophilia 
is the attraction itself to prepubescent 
individuals. The term "Lolita" comes from 
the novel and is only about an early 
adolescence girl. Lolita was depicted as 
12 in the novel, and 14 in the film. 99% 
of the depictions of fictional minors in 
the lolicon genre have small breasts. 
Prepubescent children don't have breasts. 
They're flat as a board.

The shotacon entry doesn't say "female 
pedophile". This is sexist because it 
implies only men can have attractions to 
minors. Women can be attracted to female 
and/or male minors and men can be 
attracted to male minors.

Here is my proposed updated definition 
with better parity to shotacon:

ロリコン (lolicon) sometimes shortened to 
ロリ (loli), is a Japanese slang 
portmanteau of the phrase "lolita complex" 
and describes an attraction to early 
adolescent girls, or an individual with 
such an attraction, although it has become 
a blanket term to refer to any minor 
attracted person/attraction to a minor. 
Outside Japan, the term is used less often 
with this meaning, and is used to refer to 
a genre of manga and anime wherein mostly 
preadolescent or early adolescent female 
characters are depicted in a suggestive or 
erotic manner.

daij　gg5 jawiki
Daij and jawiki say "lolita complex" is wasei. Enwiki has 
no article on "lolita complex", only on "lolicon" 
(interestingly, that page does not show up in Google 
searches)

I don't think ロリ and ロリコン should be the same entry. 
Splitting out ロリ
_
Based on enwiki, it seems "lolicon" can refer both to 
the "phenomenon" and the "person" in English. I think 
the English term refers esp. to a

@@ -7,3 +7,7 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ロリ</reb>
-</r_ele>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>lolicon</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>
+<gloss>male sexually attracted to prepubescent girls</gloss>
+</sense>
@@ -13 +16,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2399250">小児性愛者</xref>
@@ -15,5 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>Lolita complex (sexual attraction to children, esp. young girls)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
-<gloss>portraying children in an erotic style</gloss>
+<gloss>lolicon</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>

I'll align the ロリータコンプレックス and ロリ glosses.

I don't mind it.

I asked a native speaker btw what they thought and they said （ことばとして）軽いじゃ軽いけど、ペドファイルじゃペドファイル。 I don't think they're actually considered two different things to most Japanese (outside of the otaku realm), but it might certainly be the case that there's a weaker connotation of "actual child molester" than there is for say ペドファイル.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>sexual obsession with young girls</gloss>

GG5: 〔その男性〕 a man attracted to very young girls.
●あいつはロリコンだ. He's into very young girls. | He has a thing for very young girls.
中辞典:  a sexual obsession with young girls; a “Lolita complex”.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia

I'll accept that pedophile/pedophilia are probably accurate glosses, but I note that the JEs avoid that term. I suspect that in Japan there is a view that lolicon and pedophilia are slightly different things, but if you look at the actual definition of pedophilia, they are really the same.
Is there a problem with including "sexual obsession with young girls" in the glosses?

I sometimes check twitter for mentions of jmdict/jisho and I've noticed that this entry frequently comes up for discussion. It's apparent there's a sizable contingent of anime/manga fans who are into "lolicon content" that are adamant that being sexually attracted to prepubescent girls is a completely different thing from pedophilia. I don't know anything about Kevin in particular and am certainly not accusing him of anything, but I think we need to be aware there are a lot of people online who are very strongly opposed to "ロリコン" being defined as "pedophile" solely because it makes them feel personally attacked. Here's an example of a recent (June 24) Twitter thread where you can see how this usually plays out: https://twitter.com/COEofTypo/status/1539386476537970689 (there's a lot of replies but here's one that leads into this discussion of our definition as it appeared at the time on Jisho: https://twitter.com/ElFazendobarra/status/1539858524548632576 )

The argument that people on Twitter are making (that it seems Kevin is similarly arguing for) is that "ロリコン" should not be translated as "pedophile" because there are other words in Japanese that are also translated as "pedophilia/pedophile" and there is a distinction between those words (ペドフィリア/小児性愛 etc.) and ロリコン. While this is no doubt true, that it's only ロリコン that is used self-referentially, this doesn't mean that glosses like "male pedophile" or "male pedophilia" don't also belong here. We are not only concerned with getting the nuance right but also conveying the actual meaning of the word. Kevin changed "male pedophilia" to "sexual attraction to young girls" and "male pedophile" to "male with such an attraction", but are these really closer in nuance and meaning to ロリコン or just wordier and wafflier ways of saying the exact same things? That's a rhetorical question - it's obvious to me its the latter. It's hairsplitting. Look up the definitions of "pedophile" and "pedophilia" in any English dictionary. Notice also that ALL the kokugo definitions for ロリコン mention "性欲" - that an otaku-dominated wiki site like pixiv disagrees ("特別な感情" is what they call it) seems entirely irrelevant to me. This isn't a case of "Western bias", it's a case of looking at reliable sources instead of user-generated content.

I agree that "lolicon" rather than "male pedophile" should lead, for nuance etc. reasons, but that word will be meaningless to a lot of people, so we need to also include glosses that pithily explain what this actually means. We always strive for the most economical definitions so why exactly is it that we shouldn't call a spade a spade here?

Another point about the other reference Kevin posted is a blog post written by a person calling himself "初老のオタ" and the argument he is making is that ロリコン IS in fact used to refer to male pedophiles/pedophilia in Japanese media but that he finds this usage "wrong" because he has personally somewhat convolutedly decided that a "ロリコン" is somebody who is "sexually or romantically attracted to underage girls but doesn't necessarily want to act on it in real life" and that a ペド on the other hand is somebody whose "ultimate purpose" (最終目的) is to have sex with underage girls:

"ロリコン、ペド、チャイルド・マレスター……
これらの違いが曖昧な日本ならではの報道だなぁと。
...
少女・幼女に対し性的嗜好や恋愛感情を持つ事で、
最終的目標が性交の有無であるか否かは関係ありません。
...
●ロリは必ずしも性交を最終目的とはしておらず、
　ペドは性交を最終目的としている。"

We should really not be concerned with what "otaku purists" consider the correct use of the word (which by the way still would translate into "male pedophile" in English) but with how it's actually used in mainstream Japanese society. For more on that, see the multiple links I've previously posted.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<s_inf>oft. used self-referentially</s_inf>
@@ -12,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>(often sexual) attraction to young girls</gloss>
-<gloss>male (sexually) attracted to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>

I missed this, apologies. Kevin, welcome to JMDict. We always appreciate input on definitions but the multiple accusations of "cultural ignorance", "Western bias", "chauvinism", "strangeness" and  "glibness" are not at all appropriate and if you wish to continue participating in the discussion on how we should define this word, I would hope you would afford other editors more respect than you've done so far. I've changed "male with _such_ an attraction" to "male (sexually) attracted to young girls" because style-wise, we try to avoid glosses that explicitly refer to previous ones. I don't have time right now but I will try and revisit this at a later date as I'm not sure I fully agree with the changes made.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>a male with such an attraction</gloss>
+<gloss>male (sexually) attracted to young girls</gloss>

Hmm. I guess this covers Marcus' view on  "male pedophile" and "male pedophilia" references.

Kevin's case and amendments seem sound but I'd like to see Marcus's response before approving.

日本の場合、ロリコンとペドフィリアが混同され、日常語としての「ペドフィリア」は、ロリコンに比べて病的・犯罪的ニュアンスを伴って使用される場合が多い。(wiki)

現在では幼い少女を性的に好んでいる人のことを指して使われることが多いが、本来ロリータ・コンプレックスとは性的な意味合いは薄く、（異性愛の）女性がロリータ・コンプレックスであるということも大いにありえる。本来は対象は「美」少女に限らない。(pixiv)

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/ロリコン

A whole blog post on the subject:
http://yamatoasuka02.blog.fc2.com/blog-entry-762.html?sp

Video series on the topic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=lETPaGnl2aI&ab_channel=PauseandSelect

Many of the references given by others below, despite their intentions, clearly imply a distinction between the concepts of lolicon and pedophilia. Some of them, such as the Wiki quote, literally state that they are different concepts. Despite this, this same reference was somehow used to justify including the gloss of "pedophile"? Truly strange, and obviously Western bias.

The pixiv article clearly states that lolicon is not necessarily sexual, which is not something that can be said about the different concept of pedophilia. Indeed, the very fact that "pedophilia" has entered the Japanese lexicon in katakana implies a core difference.

The blog article I provide underscores the fact that this is, at best, a debated topic. The current entry glibly sides with one side of this "debate" in a way that is unscholarly. Japan has a big cultural preference for the young and 未熟, and understanding that at a deep level is essential to understanding why it's inappropriate to glibly label lolicon to be pedophilia.

Honestly, they are quite obviously similar but different concepts, and it's culturally ignorant and chauvinistic to include this gloss.

@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>sexual attraction to young girls</gloss>
-<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>
-<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>
+<gloss>(often sexual) attraction to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>a male with such an attraction</gloss>

https://nikkan-spa.jp/1481525
小児性愛は病気なのか？人口の5％いる彼らの犯罪を防ぐには
さらに、週刊誌報道によると、「中学生時代は遊び相手といえば小さな子どもだった」「いつも小さな子にベタベタと接する」といった記事もあり、今回の事件もいわゆる「ロリコン」――小児性愛者による犯
罪で、しかも、再犯だったと見られる。
...
まず、「ロリコン」とも言われる小児性愛は“病気”なのだろうか？
this article treats ロリコン as a colloquial term for 小児性愛者/小児性愛 (pedophile/pedophilia)

https://www.kadokawa.co.jp/product/301509001364/
"幼児性愛病者（ロリコン）の魔法を完全に解くことができず、10歳の子供と18歳の大人姿の二重生活をしながら王宮に勤めるリーフィア。"
as does this one

https://www.cocolabo.me/loli-com/
"世の中には社会的に認められない欲望というものがあります。その中の一つとして割とメジャーなものが「子どもへの性的欲求」いわゆる「ロリコン」です。
精神医学的には、13歳以下の子どもへ性的欲求を持つことを「幼児性愛」（ペドフェリア）と呼びます。（参考：小児性愛障害-MSDマニュアル）"
and this one

https://www.mag2.com/p/money/1076497
"ロリコン犯罪の温床「性的同意年齢13歳」をすぐに引き上げよ。親の貧困化とSNSも要因、少年少女の性暴力被害者増加＝鈴木傾城"

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/195397d3006e3ef705118829b4e31f779a8068eb
《少女わいせつ》前科3犯・ロリコン容疑者の卑劣な手口と、実母が涙で語る“性依存の闇”
"すでに仕事を引退し、いまは農業を営む両親。40歳近くにもなって自立せず、性犯罪を繰り返すロリコン息子についてどう考えているのか。"
　"改めて翌日、自宅にいる母親を訪ねてみた。すると、
「本当にすみません……。もうどうしていいのか……。息子は完全に（性犯罪の）依存症です……」"

https://www.excite.co.jp/news/article/Tocana_201805_post_16895/
週刊誌記者によると「自宅へのガサ入れで幼児性愛者である証拠品が押収されたとの情報もある。やはりロリコンの線は消せない」という。

https://friday.kodansha.co.jp/article/10174
新潟少女殺害死体遺棄事件 「ロリコン性欲者」小林遼容疑者野放し

https://bunshun.jp/articles/-/29765
子どもへの性加害は「平均週2～3回」小児性犯罪者のすさまじい実態
「そりゃセックスもしましたよ。恋人同士ですもん。それを周りの人たちが、ぶち壊したんです。私がロリコンで、Yちゃんは被害者だといって引き離したんです。
　私はそんな人達によって犯罪者にさせられました。おかしいのはどっちだっていいたいです……」
　これは、12歳の少女に性加害をした49歳の男性の言葉である。

https://somec.org/activity2012.html
"「小児性愛は日本では『ロリコン』など好みの一種とされ、治療が受けにくい状況だ。治せる疾患という認識を社会が共有し、加害者をなくす道を広げるべきだ」と話す。"

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/11ef2d546dd9c5be5d70e3a7eb861825eaed35de
3月場所中「16歳の少女」になりすまし11歳女児を…ロリコン力士の巧妙かつ卑劣な手口

https://dot.asahi.com/webdoku/2017060700082.html
ロリコン大国ニッポン 「アメリカだったら児童ポルノ扱い」

jawiki:ペドフィリア
日本の場合、ロリコンとペドフィリアが混同され、日常語としての「ペドフィリア」は、ロリコンに比べて病的・犯罪的ニュアンスを伴って使用される場合が多い。

https://www.police.pref.wakayama.lg.jp/01_anzen/syonen/kanren/index.html
児童ポルノとは、児童（18歳未満の少年。以下同じ。）を性欲の対象にした、児童のわいせつな画像(写真や動画など)のことをいいます。世間では、「ロリコン」といった呼び方で、児童ポルノを成人向けア
ダルト製品と見る風潮があります。しかしその本質は、児童に対する性犯罪・性的虐待の記録にほかなりません。
Here's a page from the Wakayama Prefectrual police explicitly saying that "lolicon" is the same thing as child pornography.



https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/answerman/2019-08-09/.149914
English language discussion where a manga translator suggests "pedophile" can't be the correct translation for ロリコン because the word "ペドファイル" (a pretty rare word 
in Japanese) exists. I disagree.


Daijs: "幼女・少女にのみ性欲を感じる異常心理"
Daijr: "性愛の対象を少女にのみ求める心理"
Koj: "性的対象として少女・幼女を愛すること。"
Shinjirin: "性愛の対象を少女にのみ求める心理。"
Nikk: "男性が、性愛の対象として少女に偏執すること。"

I think it's remiss to not include the glosses "male pedophile" and "male pedophilia". It's obvious that in Japan, this is how the word is used.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>person attracted to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>

Reopen.

Perhaps this addresses Marcus' point? I'll approve and reopen.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>attraction to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>sexual attraction to young girls</gloss>

Chanced upon this headline just now:
少女買春ロリコン大富豪のジェフリー・エプスタイン逮
捕で新世界秩序の予定が狂う!? 陰謀の世界が大混乱… 
モサドが全方位で暗躍中！

daijr: 性愛の対象を少女にのみ求める心理。
nikk:男性が、性愛の対象として少女に偏執すること。
daijs: 幼女・少女にのみ性欲を感じる異常心理。

I agree 1 sense is actually better, but 
the previous glosses "male pedophile" and 
"male sexually attracted to prepubescent 
girls" align much closer with what's in 
the kokugos. The new glosses on the other 
hand skip out on the "性愛／性欲” part 
(which is in all 3 kokugos) and on the "男
性が、” in nikk. So I don't see how that's 
an improvement.

reopen

english wikipedia

i don't think it's sexist, but i agree that it's too limited.  also, i don't think it's two senses.  we usually put the person in together with the action, etc.

i'm temp approving because i think the existing entry is clearly not right

the proposed "definition" is not appropriate for a japanese-english dictionary

@@ -9,7 +8,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>lolicon</gloss>
-<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>
-<gloss>male sexually attracted to prepubescent girls</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -19 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>
+<gloss>attraction to young girls</gloss>
+<gloss>person attracted to young girls</gloss>

The definition of "lolicon" is 
problematic, and I'd like to persuade you 
to update it since it is misinformation 
and sexist.

The definition erroneously uses the 
definition of male paedophile. A 
paedophile is the attraction to 
prepubescent individuals, and pedophilia 
is the attraction itself to prepubescent 
individuals. The term "Lolita" comes from 
the novel and is only about an early 
adolescence girl. Lolita was depicted as 
12 in the novel, and 14 in the film. 99% 
of the depictions of fictional minors in 
the lolicon genre have small breasts. 
Prepubescent children don't have breasts. 
They're flat as a board.

The shotacon entry doesn't say "female 
pedophile". This is sexist because it 
implies only men can have attractions to 
minors. Women can be attracted to female 
and/or male minors and men can be 
attracted to male minors.

Here is my proposed updated definition 
with better parity to shotacon:

ロリコン (lolicon) sometimes shortened to 
ロリ (loli), is a Japanese slang 
portmanteau of the phrase "lolita complex" 
and describes an attraction to early 
adolescent girls, or an individual with 
such an attraction, although it has become 
a blanket term to refer to any minor 
attracted person/attraction to a minor. 
Outside Japan, the term is used less often 
with this meaning, and is used to refer to 
a genre of manga and anime wherein mostly 
preadolescent or early adolescent female 
characters are depicted in a suggestive or 
erotic manner.

daij　gg5 jawiki
Daij and jawiki say "lolita complex" is wasei. Enwiki has 
no article on "lolita complex", only on "lolicon" 
(interestingly, that page does not show up in Google 
searches)

I don't think ロリ and ロリコン should be the same entry. 
Splitting out ロリ
_
Based on enwiki, it seems "lolicon" can refer both to 
the "phenomenon" and the "person" in English. I think 
the English term refers esp. to a

@@ -7,3 +7,7 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ロリ</reb>
-</r_ele>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>lolicon</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophile</gloss>
+<gloss>male sexually attracted to prepubescent girls</gloss>
+</sense>
@@ -13 +16,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2399250">小児性愛者</xref>
@@ -15,5 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>Lolita complex (sexual attraction to children, esp. young girls)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
-<gloss>portraying children in an erotic style</gloss>
+<gloss>lolicon</gloss>
+<gloss>male pedophilia</gloss>

Quiet. Closing.

Most JEs have veranda and/or porch (in Australia we say veranda for what Americans call a 
porch.) GG5 adds "the (external) corridor with a boarded floor, and usually with sliding 
glass doors, running along the outer side of a traditional Japanese house".

Attempting an expl.

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">external corridor on the outer side of traditional Japanese houses</gloss>

google images
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engawa
I don't think calling it "veranda" is helpful. Can somebody come up with a good expl?

@@ -22,4 +22 @@
-<gloss>veranda</gloss>
-<gloss>porch</gloss>
-<gloss>balcony</gloss>
-<gloss>open corridor</gloss>
+<gloss>engawa</gloss>

koj, daijr, daijs

@@ -12,1 +12,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22,0 +21,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1177490">縁・えん・6</xref>
@@ -27,0 +27,7 @@
+<sense>
+<stagk>縁側</stagk>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2576370">担鰭骨</xref>
+<gloss>bone at the base of a fin</gloss>
+<gloss>meat at the base of a fin (esp. of a flatfish)</gloss>
+</sense>

koj mentions it

@@ -9,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>椽側</keb>
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

daijs

I don't like "clear profit"

@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<gloss>clear gain</gloss>
-<gloss>clear profit</gloss>
+<gloss>great profit (which doesn't require any investment)</gloss>

GG5, etc. N-grams:
丸儲け	50036
丸もうけ	4134
まるもうけ	8486

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>clear profit</gloss>

Common alternative spelling.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>丸もうけ</keb>

gg5, prog

I think "banquet" and "feast" are a bit misleading.

@@ -20,4 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>entertainment</gloss>
-<gloss>treat</gloss>
-<gloss>feast</gloss>
-<gloss>banquet</gloss>
+<gloss>entertaining with food and drink</gloss>
+<gloss>treating to dinner</gloss>
+<gloss>wining and dining</gloss>
@@ -29,0 +29 @@
+<gloss>pandering</gloss>

restoring news tags lost in merge

@@ -8,0 +9,2 @@
+<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>nf35</ke_pri>
@@ -11,0 +14,2 @@
+<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
+<re_pri>nf35</re_pri>

daij koj

merging 1233610

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>供応</keb>
@@ -18,0 +21,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1253250">迎合・げいごう</xref>
+<gloss>immediately agreeing with someone else</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -29 +29 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">falling seven times, getting up eight</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">falling seven times, getting up eight times</gloss>

@@ -28,0 +29 @@
+<gloss g_type="lit">falling seven times, getting up eight</gloss>

daij

しちてんはっき is a yoji but ななころびやおき is not - split 
out?

@@ -25 +25,8 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>not giving up</gloss>
+<gloss>keeping at it until one succeeds</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
@@ -28 +34,0 @@
-<gloss>always rising after a fall or repeated failures</gloss>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

gg5, prog, ルミナス, daij, meikyo

I've split sense 5 into two senses. I think this is clearer.
Tidied up the other senses.
I don't think we need so many arch senses.
I'll reindex the sentences if this is approved.

@@ -15,2 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>over</gloss>
@@ -19,2 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>over</gloss>
-<gloss>elder (e.g. daughter)</gloss>
@@ -25,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>upper part</gloss>
@@ -31,45 +29,57 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>before</gloss>
-<gloss>previous</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>superiority</gloss>
-<gloss>one's superior</gloss>
-<gloss>one's elder</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<s_inf>following a verb or adjective</s_inf>
-<gloss>on top of that</gloss>
-<gloss>besides</gloss>
-<gloss>what's more</gloss>
-<gloss>not only ... but</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<s_inf>following a verb or noun</s_inf>
-<gloss>upon (further inspection, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>based on (and occurring after)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>matters concerning ...</gloss>
-<gloss>as concerns ...</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<s_inf>as ～上は</s_inf>
-<gloss>since (i.e. "for that reason")</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>on (top of)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>the above (in a piece of writing)</gloss>
+<gloss>earlier part</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>superior</gloss>
+<gloss>better</gloss>
+<gloss>higher (position, rank, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>upper (class)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>elder</gloss>
+<gloss>older</gloss>
+<gloss>senior</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>as ...上で(は) or ...上の</s_inf>
+<gloss>with respect to ...</gloss>
+<gloss>in terms of</gloss>
+<gloss>as far as ... is concerned</gloss>
+<gloss>when (e.g. drunk)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>as ...上(に)</s_inf>
+<gloss>besides ...</gloss>
+<gloss>in addition to ...</gloss>
+<gloss>on top of ...</gloss>
+<gloss>as well as ...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>as ...上(で)</s_inf>
+<gloss>after ...</gloss>
+<gloss>upon ...</gloss>
+<gloss>on ...</gloss>
+<gloss>with (e.g. full awareness)</gloss>
+<gloss>as a result of ...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<s_inf>as ...上で(は)</s_inf>
+<gloss>since ...</gloss>
+<gloss>now that ...</gloss>
+<gloss>because ...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
@@ -78 +88 @@
-<s_inf>suffix indicating higher social standing than the speaker</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after a person of higher status</s_inf>
@@ -81,8 +91,4 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>place of one's superior (e.g. the throne)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>dear</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -94,5 +99,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>noblewoman (esp. the wife of a nobleman)</gloss>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -69 +69,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -63 +63,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -56 +56,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -47 +47,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -35 +35 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

I put it there in 2011. GG5 has sense 1 as the noun "〔上部〕 the 「upper [top] side; the 「upper [top] part; 〔表面〕 the surface." and sense 3 covering adjectival use: "上の 〔高い〕 higher 《than…》; 〔…以上の〕 more than…; above…; over…; beyond…; 〔すぐれた〕 superior 《to…》; 〔年上の〕 older 《than…》". That's really our sense 1. I think it's OK.

should "above" and "elder" really be in 
the same sense?

Slight fix.

@@ -52 +52 @@
-<gloss>not only</gloss>
+<gloss>not only ... but</gloss>

Added additional translation to sense 6.

@@ -51,0 +52 @@
+<gloss>not only</gloss>

GG5

Didn't change the order of anything but tried to improve several of the glosses, not least the PoS's.
I think that sense 7 can't follow an adjective and that sense 6 can't follow a noun but I could be wrong.
Not sure of what sense 4 should be.
Might need more work but I think this is at least an improvement.

@@ -24,3 +23,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -28,0 +26,5 @@
+<gloss>head (e.g. of a staircase)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>surface</gloss>
@@ -34,9 +35,0 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>surface</gloss>
-<gloss>on</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -49,2 +41,0 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
@@ -52 +43,2 @@
-<gloss>one's superior (i.e. one's elder)</gloss>
+<gloss>one's superior</gloss>
+<gloss>one's elder</gloss>
@@ -55,2 +46,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -58 +48 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<s_inf>following a verb or adjective</s_inf>
@@ -64,2 +53,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -67 +55 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<s_inf>following a verb or noun</s_inf>
@@ -72,2 +59,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -75,2 +61 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<gloss>matters concerning...</gloss>
+<gloss>matters concerning ...</gloss>
@@ -80,2 +64,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -83,2 +66 @@
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<s_inf>as ...上は</s_inf>
+<s_inf>as ～上は</s_inf>
@@ -91 +73,3 @@
-<gloss>suffix indicating higher social standing</gloss>
+<s_inf>suffix indicating higher social standing than the speaker</s_inf>
+<gloss>honorable</gloss>
+<gloss>venerable</gloss>
@@ -96 +80 @@
-<gloss>place of one's superior (i.e. the throne)</gloss>
+<gloss>place of one's superior (e.g. the throne)</gloss>

i think it's my doing, but at some point, pos should be improved.  e.g., i'm sure not all of these act adverbially.

GG5, 新和英中辞典, etc.

My first reaction was "surely that's covered already?", as I've been saying "上の娘" for years (having two daughters). On checking I see the JEs include it in the above/over/etc. gloss, which is where I think it should go too.

@@ -20,0 +20,1 @@
+<gloss>elder (e.g. daughter)</gloss>
@@ -110,5 +111,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<s_inf>E.g. 上の妹</s_inf>
-<gloss>elder (of family people in given category, e.g. the elder of one's younger sisters)</gloss>
-</sense>

Add “elder of family members” sense – generally used for “older younger sister” or “older older uncle” etc.
(Same story.)

@@ -110,0 +110,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<s_inf>E.g. 上の妹</s_inf>
+<gloss>elder (of family people in given category, e.g. the elder of one's younger sisters)</gloss>
+</sense>

also this

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>勢ぞろい</keb>

@@ -6,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>勢揃</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

Yes, gets about 40k in the n-grams.

Added for ease in searches.  Encountered this alternate 
spelling in a manga.

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>大へん</keb>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/屠殺
gg5
屠殺	64525
畜殺	769
屠畜	8882

I don't think this is "sensitive". It's the most common word for animal slaughter.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<misc>&sens;</misc>
@@ -17,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>butchery</gloss>

G n-grams:
屠殺	64525
と殺	14109

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>と殺</keb>

[sens] is already on 屠殺人 but both 屠殺 and 屠殺場  appear as well on (admittedly 
unofficial) 放送禁止用語 lists like http://monoroch.net/kinshi/

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&sens;</misc>

@@ -21,1 +21,0 @@
-<xref type="see">気が動転する</xref>

大辞林

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>動顛</keb>
@@ -18,1 +21,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2266120">気が動転する</xref>
+<xref type="see">気が動転する</xref>

[vi]: shinmeikai, oukoku, meikyo 2e

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| 這い這いする |   224 |
| はいはいする | 2,775 |

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

"chn"  (children's language) had been left off the code list. I have added it now.

This entry has the code "(chn)", which I can't find in any of the code tables on the info page. Perhaps it is an error?

daij, prog, 新和英中辞典

I don't think I've ever seen this used for sense 3. Also, of these refs, only daijr/daijs include sense 3. Maybe [arch]?

@@ -22,0 +22,1 @@
+<gloss>clumsy</gloss>
@@ -23,1 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>clumsy</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +27,14 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>tactless</gloss>
+<gloss>awkward (e.g. socially)</gloss>
+<gloss>gauche</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>mean</gloss>
+<gloss>cowardly</gloss>
+<gloss>base</gloss>
+</sense>

[vt,vi]: shinmeikai, oukoku, meikyo, iwakoku

I don't think sense [2] is [vs] (compare to the referenced term 腐生)

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| 腐食　　 | 948,875 | 95.7% |
| 腐蝕　　 |  42,533 |  4.3% |
| ふしょく |     944 |  N/A  |

@@ -21,0 +22,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -32 +33,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>rust</gloss>

gg5

@@ -22,0 +23,4 @@
+<gloss>etching</gloss>
+<gloss>action of acid</gloss>
+<gloss>rot</gloss>
+<gloss>erosion</gloss>

meikyo
2)《人を表す名詞の下に付いて》その人も逃げ出すほど、みごと(な腕前)であること。「玄人(くろうと)―の技」「専門家―の業績」

suggested changes by David.  but i don't see any indication that sense 2 is an abbreviation.  the other dics all just say 「はだしで逃げる」意から

@@ -30,2 +30,2 @@
-<pos>&suf;</pos>
-<gloss>superior to (a professional)</gloss>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>superior to (a professional, etc. in ability or achievement)</gloss>

with the sense restriction it may be easier to split

@@ -29,0 +29,1 @@
+<stagr>はだし</stagr>

koj, daijr, daijs

@@ -19,0 +19,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>せんそく</reb>
+<re_restr>跣足</re_restr>
+</r_ele>

gg5

@@ -11,0 +11,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>跣足</keb>

gg5

@@ -27,0 +27,1 @@
+<gloss>exorcism</gloss>

It's not even in the main JIS X 0208 standard, but in the supplementary JIS X 0212. I think the Asahi was quotong it rather than using it.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

Used in Asahi Shimbun so probably not oK?
https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASL2H4Q6XL2HUTIL02C.html
"国民の成人年齢を１８歳に引き下げる民法改正案に伴い、天皇や皇
太子の成人を１８歳と定めた皇室典範の規定を削除する案を政府が自
民党に示したところ、「皇室への冒瀆（ぼうとく）だ」と激しい反発
を受けている。"

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

ngrams

Reordering and removing [uk]

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>冒涜</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11,2 @@
-<keb>冒涜</keb>
+<keb>冒瀆</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,4 +16,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>冒瀆</keb>
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<gloss>bruxism</gloss>

daijr, daijs, prog, Luminous

@@ -27,0 +27,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -28,0 +32,1 @@
+<gloss>shutting one's eyes (to)</gloss>

@@ -7,0 +7,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>頬かぶり</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>頬かむり</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,0 +15,2 @@
+<re_restr>頬被り</re_restr>
+<re_restr>頬かぶり</re_restr>
@@ -12,0 +20,2 @@
+<re_restr>頬被り</re_restr>
+<re_restr>頬かむり</re_restr>

[vt]: shinmeikai, oukoku, meikyo, iwakoku

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daijs, nikk, meikyo

merge, sorted by hits.  koj and daijr keep separate, but only due to historical kana

@@ -5,1 +5,4 @@
-<keb>歎称</keb>
+<keb>嘆賞</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>嘆称</keb>
@@ -9,0 +12,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>歎称</keb>
@@ -17,0 +23,1 @@
+<gloss>praise</gloss>

nikk: 法律用語として用いられていたが、現在では汚職という。
涜職	1443
汚職	280120

daijs says it's sahen, but I didn't find any evidence for this

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1179010">汚職</xref>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>

koj, daijr, daijs, prog, nc

when your cat rubs its face up against your leg it's not ほお擦りing you

@@ -19,1 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>nestling one's face against</gloss>
+<gloss>rubbing cheeks together (as a display of affection)</gloss>
+<gloss>pressing cheeks together</gloss>

daij

@@ -6,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>頬摺り</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>頬ずり</keb>

gg5, prog

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>making a killing</gloss>

Entry created

gg5, prog, ウィズダム

@@ -18,2 +18,5 @@
-<gloss>when it's important</gloss>
-<gloss>when it comes to the crunch</gloss>
+<gloss>at the critical moment</gloss>
+<gloss>when the time comes</gloss>
+<gloss>when it's most important</gloss>
+<gloss>when necessary</gloss>
+<gloss>in an emergency</gloss>
@@ -21,3 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>when it comes to the point</gloss>
-<gloss>in one's hour of need</gloss>
-<gloss>at the critical moment</gloss>

Unidic classifies as 名詞, 普通名詞, 副詞可能, -> Noun, Common Noun, Adverb-able

Added noun, adverbial noun, as in Unidic

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&n-adv;</pos>

please provide ngram counts

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>いざと言う時</keb>
+<keb>いざという時</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>いざという時</keb>
+<keb>いざと言う時</keb>

GG5 「いざ」 Genius

More glosses

@@ -18,0 +18,4 @@
+<gloss>when push comes to shove</gloss>
+<gloss>when it comes to the point</gloss>
+<gloss>in one's hour of need</gloss>
+<gloss>at the critical moment</gloss>

Entry created

Also I think this is actually ほねずり - consider that ALL 25 XXX刷り entries in Daijisen end 
with "ずり" rather than "すり"
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/srch/jn/刷り/m2u/

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>ほねすり</reb>
+<reb>ほねずり</reb>

saw used as this, google checks out

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>key plate print (woodblock, copper etching)</gloss>
+<gloss>key-block print (woodblock, copper etching)</gloss>
+<gloss>key-plate print</gloss>

Saw the block referred to.as "outline 
block" in an Andon article

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>outline block print</gloss>

That seems good. I was tempted to add "outline print".

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>monochrome print (woodblock, copper etching)</gloss>
+<gloss>key plate print (woodblock, copper etching)</gloss>

"key plate print" maybe?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_plate

I'm not sure how to translate this best but I think "monochrome" is somewhat wrong - I think honesuri is a "key print", e.g. 
"key" as in CMYK, meaning "black". In early (Edo, Meiji period) karuta production it was common to print the black outlines 
with a woodblock or metal and then do the colors with kappazuri (stencil)

Some pages use it for 銅板刷 too.
Googling for 骨刷, then looking at "images" brought up mostly make-up brushes. Turns out they were all Chinese (the images option drops the language setting.)

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>uncoloured woodblock print (uncolored)</gloss>
+<gloss>monochrome print (woodblock, copper etching)</gloss>

http://www.geocities.jp/xmbwq497/karuta/echigokobana.html
"版木から墨だけで刷ったものを「骨刷り」と言う。これから型紙をあて、
彩色していく。"
http://tengudo.jp/index.php?
main_page=product_info&products_id=32
"現在の花札より古いデザインで独特の絵柄から他の地域でも人気が高
く、残っていた骨刷から復刻しました。"
_
reading is a guess (by a native speaker)

same as 版下? "block print"?

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>inscription on a monument, tombstone, etc.</gloss>
-<gloss>to engrave that inscription</gloss>
+<gloss>inscription</gloss>
+<gloss>to compose the text for an inscription, usually an epitaph</gloss>

ddaijs, daijr