lsrc tag no needed if we have the first sense.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">dual coat</lsource>

I agree.

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>dual coat (paint, finish, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>

The google results (esp. images) seem to be all about the double coating, actually?

I'm seeing a few cases where it seems to mean dual coating.

daijs: https://kotobank.jp/word/デュアルコート-576962

デュアルコート	60
リバーシブルコート	1551

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>dual coat</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1142270">リバーシブルコート</xref>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">dual coat</lsource>
+<gloss>reversible coat</gloss>

https://www.nato.int/nato-welcome/index.html

I think there's only one official spelling.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>North Atlantic Treaty Organization (Organisation)</gloss>
+<gloss>North Atlantic Treaty Organization</gloss>

Added a useful xref

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2748930">北大西洋条約機構</xref>

https://www.asahi.com/articles/DA3S15056060.html
4歳の孫が夫婦間での呼び方そのままに、父親の名前を呼び捨てにし、母親のことは「○○ちゃん」と呼んだ。
https://dot.asahi.com/dot/2019122000068.html?page=1
「くん」「ちゃん」をクリアしたら、次はいよいよ「呼び捨て」だ。
https://komachi.yomiuri.co.jp/topics/id/716134/
自分の子はちゃん付け、他人の子は呼び捨てのママの心理は？
https://w.grapps.me/love/286908/
今まで「呼び捨て」で呼んでいた彼氏が、「ちゃん」付けで呼ぶようになったとしたら、
https://www.sankei.com/article/20211016-QCE3KDYC4VKUFBKVVECAG6IZUQ/
小学校３年生の息子がいます。子供同士、呼び捨てで呼び合っているのがとても気になります。
... その友達のお母さんの前でも呼び捨てで呼ぶので、申し訳ない気持ちになったりします。男の子には「くん」を、女の子には「さん」をつけて、呼び合ってほしいと思う私は古い考えでしょうか？　息子も以前は「ちゃん」や「くん」で呼んでいたように思います。やめさせるにはどうすればいいでしょうか。
https://www.sankei.com/article/20161103-X3BDHZIHUNMXHB3NISUNZL5IZM/6/
先生　９月９日付の朝日新聞朝刊に「愛ちゃん　台湾・江選手と結婚」という記事があったが、読んだら「リオデジャネイロ五輪の卓球女子団体で銅メダルに輝いた福原愛（２７）＝ＡＮＡ＝が今月初め…」と、呼び捨てにしているんだ。

Well, the point you are making is plainly wrong, "-chan" is clearly among the suffixes that "yobisute" indicates you're not using. Daijisen says "「君」「様」「さん」_など_の敬称" (my emphasis). Koj mentions 殿・様・さん・君. That doesn't mean we need to include "殿" or さま here, it's not an exhaustive list.
The wording you're suggesting doesn't make sense to me either, "even '-sama'" seems to imply that "-sama" would be the least polite of the suffixes listed, when it's quite the opposite.

https://www.weblio.jp/content/呼び捨て

Please refer to 小学館大辞泉. It says "《「よびずて」とも》人の名を「君」「様」「さん」などの敬称をつけずに呼ぶこと。" So addressing someone "-chan" or not is not even what "yobisute" is talking about.  "-chan" is totally out of concern of this context.  Only whether addressing someone by "-san", "-sama", "-kun" OR NOT is the context of "yobisute".  That is my point.

https://www.weblio.jp/content/呼び捨て

Please refer to 小学館大辞泉. It says "《「よびずて」とも》人の名を「君」「様」「さん」などの敬称をつけずに呼ぶこと。" So addressing someone "-chan" or not is not even what "yobisute" is talking about.  "-chan" is totally out of concern of this context.  Only whether addressing someone by "-san", "-sama", "-kun" OR NOT is the context of "yobisute".  That is my point.

@@ -22,2 +22 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2668960">呼び捨てにする</xref>
-<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan" (considered impolite)</gloss>
+<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama" (considered impolite)</gloss>

Thank you for the suggestion. I don't think it reads better than the previous version though, so I'm restoring it.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama" (considered impolite)</gloss>
+<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan" (considered impolite)</gloss>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan" (considered impolite)</gloss>
+<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama" (considered impolite)</gloss>

Hmm. I hope this doesn't keep going round.

〈呼（び）／よび／ヨビ〉〈捨（て）／すて／ステ〉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 呼び捨て │ 270,111 │ 97.5% │
│ 呼びすて │   3,284 │  1.2% │ - add, sK
│ 呼捨て　 │   1,605 │  0.6% │ - sK
│ 呼び捨　 │     412 │  0.1% │
│ 呼びステ │     104 │  0.0% │
│ 呼捨　　 │      71 │  0.0% │
│ よび捨て │      48 │  0.0% │
│ よびすて │   1,111 │  0.4% │
│ ヨビステ │     169 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -10,0 +11,4 @@
+<keb>呼びすて</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,2 +25,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2668960">呼び捨てにする</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2668960">呼び捨てにする</xref>

Thank you for the suggestion. I don't think it reads better than the previous version though, so I'm restoring it.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama" (considered impolite)</gloss>
+<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan" (considered impolite)</gloss>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan" (considered impolite)</gloss>
+<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama" (considered impolite)</gloss>

Hmm. I hope this doesn't keep going round.

Not necessarily honorofic - 君, ちゃん
I think the "such as" was helpful

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>addressing (someone) without using an honorific title</gloss>
+<gloss>addressing (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan" (considered impolite)</gloss>

Done.

Reopen to remind me of the "koyomi" gloss changes.

カレンダー	14966264
こよみ	141522
暦	1734817

Robin's suggestion has been there for a while and no one has responded. I think it's a good way to go. The "koyomi" romaji version seems to get little or no use - most WWW hits are for a brand of shochu.
I'll pull this back to one sense, drop the koyomi gloss, and unless there are objections I'll edit the glosses of the ~20 entries with "koyomi" in them.

@@ -25,4 +24,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>koyomi (traditional Japanese calendar)</gloss>

All the refs have れき for 暦.
I'm not sure we need a separate sense. I think it would be better to remove "koyomi" from the entries that have it and replace it with "Japanese calendar" or "traditional Japanese calendar".

Here is a suggested split (the JEs don't.) Feel free to edit. If approved a heap of xrefs need tweaking.
BTW, should れき be a reading at all? The kokugos don't have it.

@@ -24,0 +25,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>koyomi (traditional Japanese calendar)</gloss>
@@ -26 +29,0 @@
-<gloss>koyomi</gloss>

GG5, etc.

About 30% verbal.
強行採決	158754	  
強行採決を	17193	  
強行採決し	15096
強行採決さ	12014	 
強行採決をし	1983	  
強行採決を繰り返し	1230	  
強行採決をする	814	 

法案を強行採決	7134	 <--- bill(law), measure
決議を強行採決	43	  <-- resolution, but resolutions are inherently less common

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=強行採決
forcible passage
steamrolling
強行採決する
railroad（～を）
争点になっている法案を強行採決する
railroad a controversial bill
委員会で強行採決される
be railroaded through the committee

https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/steamroller_2?q=steamrollered
steamroller: verb
(North American English usually steam roll) <----------------

https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/強行採決
Steamrolling: 5
steamrolled: 2   (in one instance, the Japanese half had 強行採決 twice, and got 1 as steamrolled, and one as railroaded)
railroaded: 2
forced vote: 2
forced to approve: 1
steamrollering: 0
steamroller: 0

https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/american_english/steamroll   <--- "american_english"
They steamrolled the bill through Congress.

"steamroller voting" is an extremely rare collocation in English (google).  Hard to imagine where this would be useful. 

images that come back in a news search seem to suggest that [politics] is appropriate.

Never heard "steamrollering", but oxford confirms a North American often wouldn't. 

"steamrolled the measure" 2 google hits; "The GOP dominated Senate steamrolled the measure through by a 22-11 vote "
"steamrollered the measure" 5 google hits House of Commons Hansard Debates: "steamrollered the measure through the House before the general election"
"railroaded the measure" 27 hits

Googits are of course inaccurate, so who's to say.  I could scroll for a while on all of these though:
"steamrolled the bill" 4400
"steamrollered the bill" 2500
"railroaded the bill" 6500

eijiro prefers "railroaded" for all its verbal glosses (about 7 of them).

@@ -18,2 +18,4 @@
-<gloss>forced passage of a bill</gloss>
-<gloss>steamroller voting</gloss>
+<field>&politics;</field>
+<gloss>forced passage (of a bill, measure, resolution, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>railroading</gloss>
+<gloss>steamrolling</gloss>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

GG5

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>forcing through a bill</gloss>
+<gloss>forced passage of a bill</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/強行採決/#jn-270799

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>forcing through a bill</gloss>

GG5, etc.

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>addressee, address (on envelope, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>address (on envelope, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>addressee</gloss>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>address (on envelope, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>addressee, address (on envelope, etc.)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&art;</field>

GG5, Wikipedia

Standard form.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>fragrant olive</gloss>
+<gloss>fragrant olive (Osmanthus fragrans)</gloss>
@@ -14,2 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>Osmanthus fragrans</gloss>
-<gloss>Olea fragrans</gloss>

@@ -31 +31 @@
-<s_inf>usu. after もの</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. as ...もの〜</s_inf>

gg5 examples

なりがち	866626
なりがちな	330829
忘れがち	187005
忘れがちな	78906
考えがち	68217
考えがちな	9045

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

gg5, daij

Added senses.
Sense 3 is difficult to gloss.

@@ -13,4 +13,20 @@
-<s_inf>describing a negative tendency</s_inf>
-<gloss>apt to do</gloss>
-<gloss>liable to do</gloss>
-<gloss>tend to do</gloss>
+<s_inf>after a noun or -masu stem of verb; describes a negative tendency</s_inf>
+<gloss>apt to (do)</gloss>
+<gloss>liable to</gloss>
+<gloss>prone to</gloss>
+<gloss>inclined to</gloss>
+<gloss>tend to</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>predominantly</gloss>
+<gloss>mostly</gloss>
+<gloss>having lots of</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>
+<s_inf>usu. after もの</s_inf>
+<gloss>... reaps the rewards</gloss>
+<gloss>... takes the prize</gloss>
+<gloss>... wins</gloss>

主目的と	817464	  
主目的とし	709657	  
主目的とした	439765	  
主目的として	222613	  
主目的としたもの	215929	  
主目的として実施	215224	  
主目的として実施する	215167	  
主目的とした協力	215161	  
主目的とし多くの	215160	  
主目的として実施する場合	215160	  
主目的とし多く	215160

I don't think so.

主目的	1137238
主目的は	19553
主目的が	4925
主目的な	3942
主目的の	9617
主目的と	817464

I agree, but maybe adv-to?

in jitsuyo but not the others

I don't rhink this is adj-na. If it is, I think it would need to be a separate sense.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

Entry created

G n-grams:

ヘタレ	786770
へたれ	470838
ヘタレな	134445
へたれな	37588

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>へたれ</reb>
+<reb>ヘタレ</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ヘタレ</reb>
+<reb>へたれ</reb>

Not sure this adds much.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>wuss</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>wuss</gloss>

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>wuss</gloss>

http://zokugo-dict.com/29he/hetare.htm (漢字で屁垂れと書く...)
G n-grams:
ヘタレ	786770
へたれ	470838
屁垂れ	3602

I thought about adding 屁垂れ and "uk", but it's so uncommon it's not even worth a note. So I'm just adding a comment.

I rather liked that gloss.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>no skin off my nose</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&id;</misc>

Converting somebody to someone
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>somebody else's problem</gloss>
+<gloss>someone else's problem</gloss>

I don't think that "expl" is needed.

@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">somebody else's problem is no concern of yours</gloss>
+<gloss>somebody else's problem</gloss>

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>expression meaning that somebody else's problem is no concern of yours</gloss>
-<gloss>lit: fire on the opposite shore</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">somebody else's problem is no concern of yours</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">fire on the opposite shore</gloss>

〈足／脚／あし／アシ〉を〈引／ひ／ヒ〉（っ／ッ）〈張／ぱ〉る

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 足を引っ張る　 │ 81,703 │ 85.2% │
│ 足をひっぱる　 │  8,665 │  9.0% │ - sK
│ 足を引っぱる　 │  3,719 │  3.9% │ - sK
│ 脚を引っ張る　 │    730 │  0.8% │ - add, sK
│ 足を引張る　　 │    643 │  0.7% │ - add, sK
│ 脚をひっぱる　 │    131 │  0.1% │
│ あしを引っ張る │    123 │  0.1% │
│ アシを引っ張る │     48 │  0.1% │
│ あしをひっぱる │    163 │  0.2% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13,9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>脚を引っ張る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>足を引張る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>to hold back others from achieving success</gloss>
+<gloss>to hold back (someone) from achieving success</gloss>

G n-grams:

足を引っ張る	81703
足をひっぱる	8665
足を引っぱる	3719

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>足を引っぱる</keb>

en.wiki

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<field>&food;</field>
@@ -21 +22 @@
-<gloss>shaoxingjiu (Chinese alcohol made from rice or glutinous millet)</gloss>
+<gloss>Shaoxing wine</gloss>

《现代汉语词典》 for official pinyin orthography

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi"/>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi">shàoxīngjiǔ</lsource>

Entry created

Thank you Robin, those comments explained a lot and I will keep that all in mind.  I've only just now seen usage [note] tags here and there, and *just now* realized the "Sense note" field in "advanced search" lets you find existing examples.

The [note] is a better approach than what I did. And sorry, yes, I was as bit uncomfortable calling that gloss [lit].  I will not do that in the future.  

I see the mailing list is posted online, I'll make an effort to read through things and catch up, especially on NG.

GG5: 彼女のことで頭がいっぱいで勉強も手につかない様子だ. It seems that his head is full of her and he is in no mood for studying.
中辞典: 仕事が手につかない cannot settle to (one's) work; be in no mood for work
ルミナス: 手につかない cannot settle down to…

Thanks. I was about to say/do much the same.

gg5, prog, luminous, daij
http://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/JMdict:_Next_Generation#Entry-wide_Inflection_Pattern_Elements

We use adj-i in cases like this because we want sites/apps to be able to handle inflected forms. Separating inflectional information from PoS tags is something that's been proposed for JMdict: NG. See the link above.
I think ellipses used in conjunction with a note help to show how this expression is used.
Transitivity tags are not used on expressions.
手がつかない would need to be a separate entry.
A lit gloss should be a word-for-word translation. It wouldn't be helpful here.

@@ -12,8 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>手がつかない</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>手が付かない</keb>
@@ -27 +19 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
@@ -29,2 +21,4 @@
-<gloss>unable to focus (on something, esp. work, study, etc.) (esp. since preoccupied with something else)</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="lit">(something) fails to hold one's attention</gloss>
+<s_inf>as ...が〜 or ...も〜</s_inf>
+<gloss>unable to focus on ... (due to being preoccupied with something else)</gloss>
+<gloss>unable to concentrate on ...</gloss>
+<gloss>unable to settle down to ...</gloss>

Small change, I think "focus" is a better gloss for the meaning I've suggested. "unable to focus on work" vs. "unable to concentrate on work", this is mostly stylistic, I think, but google counts seem to roughly support this intuition.

If this were treated as [vi], it really should be "to be unable to focus". And perhaps
 [lit] (said of something) to not hold one's attention

If this is merely [adj-i], how do we get from here to 仕事が手につきません...

======

sankoku and daijs both use 集中 (concentration (on a task); focusing one's attention)
nikk uses 身が入らない　（can't:  to give one's everything; to make one's best effort; to be enthused; to put your back into it​）

@@ -29 +29 @@
-<gloss>unable to concentrate (on something, esp. work, study, etc.) (esp. since preoccupied with something else)</gloss>
+<gloss>unable to focus (on something, esp. work, study, etc.) (esp. since preoccupied with something else)</gloss>

黒ごま	301801
黒ゴマ	234872
黒胡麻	136763

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>黒ごま</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -6,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>黒胡麻</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +14 @@
-<reb>くろゴマ</reb>
+<reb>くろごま</reb>
@@ -13 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>black sesame (seeds)</gloss>
+<field>&food;</field>
+<gloss>black sesame</gloss>

Entry created

Reformat initialsms
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>ワイ・ツー・ケー</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ワイツーケイ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1624460">２０００年問題・にせんねんもんだい</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1624460">２０００年問題</xref>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1624460">２０００年問題</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1624460">２０００年問題・にせんねんもんだい</xref>

daijs

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>Ｙ２Ｋ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1624460">２０００年問題</xref>
@@ -10 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>Y2K</gloss>
+<gloss>Y2K (bug)</gloss>
+<gloss>year 2000 problem</gloss>

See 呼び捨て

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>to address (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan"</gloss>
+<gloss>to address (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-kun" or even "-sama"</gloss>

I don't think "honorific suffix" is right 
for things like "-chan" and "-kun".
It's called "title suffix" in this book:
https://books.google.se/books?
id=jlCeDAAAQBAJ&lpg=PA169&dq=san%20chan%20
kun%20yobisute&pg=PA169#v=onepage&q=san%20
chan%20kun%20yobisute&f=false

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to address (someone) without using an honorific title</gloss>
-<gloss>to refer to (someone) without an honorific title</gloss>
+<gloss>to address (someone) without using a suffix such as "-san" or "-chan"</gloss>
+<gloss>to refer to (someone) without a title suffix</gloss>

Quiet

Eijiro: 向かって声にならない叫びを上げる〔～に〕: scream silently at
声にならないままである : remain muted
https://hinative.com/ja/questions/1230819

Maybe this?

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>unable to speak (due to overwhelming emotion)</gloss>

jitsuyo
心中にこみ上げる感情が、言葉に表現できないさま。名状しがたい感覚に襲われている様子。

Eijiro

900k hits.

@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<gloss>mute</gloss>

http://uranai.nosv.org/u.php/novel/tatumakiotosi/parts  
http://gackt-army.livejournal.com/913913.html?thread=5900793  
http://awhimsicalstar.dreamwidth.org/2387.html

conceptional 15787
conceptual 5111789

Indeed. Seems to be exclusively AmE and rather rare.

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=conceptional+drawing,+conceptual+drawing&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3&direct_url=t1;,conceptional drawing;,c0;.t1;,conceptual drawing;,c0

conceptual is more than 100x more common in googlecs ngrams.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>conceptional drawing (of a building) at completion</gloss>
+<gloss>conceptual drawing (of a building) at completion</gloss>

WikiDiff: "As adjectives the difference between conceptual and conceptional. is that conceptual is of, or relating to concepts or mental conception; existing in the imagination while conceptional is of or relating to conception."

Both JEs I based the entry on say "conceptional". Are they wrong? I don't think so.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>conceptual drawing (of a building) at completion</gloss>
+<gloss>conceptional drawing (of a building) at completion</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>conceptional drawing (of a building) at completion</gloss>
+<gloss>conceptual drawing (of a building) at completion</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&art;</field>

花鳥図	8074
花鳥画	17207
http://www.moaart.or.jp/collections/006/
花鳥図

POssibly arch.

Let's do that. The examples I saw seemed nounish.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

This looks like an adj gloss to me. Should PoS be adj-no,n?

WWW hits.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>十六打ち</keb>
@@ -12 +15 @@
-<gloss>16 strand braided</gloss>
+<gloss>16-strand braided (rope)</gloss>

For the reading, see

https://www.taisei-mfg.co.jp/lesson.html

For the meaning, see

https://www.fiber-tokyorope.jp/english/facility/

I've also used Google image search and reference to physical objects in my possession to confirm this.

Initially I thought this was "double-braided" but that turned out to be something else. There is a PDF file here:

https://www.tesac.co.jp/operation/fiberrope-belt/fiber_rope.pdf

which explains what the difference is between 12打ち and 8打ち.

for the record, most freq as a ダジャレ (that woukdn't make a great entry) where 殺し屋 is used literally:
ロシアの殺し屋	738	  
ロシアの殺し屋恐ろし	107	  
ロシアの殺し屋恐ろしや	80	  
ロシアの殺し屋おそろし	69	  
ロシアの殺し屋おそろしや	59

OK. I'm always partial to including things I've actually heard used in real life and I tend to weigh such instances much heavier than the online presence of a word, but otoh this is the kind of word you would expect to explode  in usage online right now even if it had somehow been more common offline than online.

You only get 337 hits for 病院 if you click to the last page of results. This is the number of results that Google has retrieved (and it's always a small number). It's true that Google hits aren't a very reliable metric but a low hit count of the first page is usually a good indication that the queried term is uncommon.
Japanese is absolutely full of puns. I don't think they belong in jmdict unless they're especially common or in a major ref. I don't think this one is anywhere near common enough.

I think it's worth adding, but including "ephemeral" in the comments so it can be checked in the future.

there are only 337 googits for the word 病院
do not take it as gospel

豆乳	2888835

Yes, comparatively obscure.

https://kotobank.jp/word/豆漿-2851953

豆漿	4748

Aligning

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>fragrant olive</gloss>
+<gloss>fragrant olive (Osmanthus fragrans)</gloss>
@@ -16,2 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>Osmanthus fragrans</gloss>
-<gloss>Olea fragrans</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/桂花-1073117

https://kotobank.jp/word/桂花陳酒-759924
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/桂花陳酒

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, RP, etc.

https://kotobank.jp/word/鉱泉水-1314447
wiki

鉱泉水   	18934
ミネラルウォーター	1305122

Not common in media and not even in Wikipedia. I don't think this is well-established enough to include.

https://twitter.com/search?q=宇露戦争&f=live
https://note.com/wwwww/n/nf88e73a234ad

wiki

in the news

ナチスドイツ	50308
ナチドイツ	793

wasei doitsugo

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/スキルス
https://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/scirrhus
スキルス	        22976
スキルス胃癌	8064
スキルス癌	662  <- existing entry

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>demon's prayer (Otsu-e motif depicting a demon wearing monk's robes and holding a bell)</gloss>
+<gloss>demon's prayer (Ōtsu-e motif depicting a demon wearing monk's robes and holding a bell)</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2845861">大津絵</xref>

daijs nikk etc.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>parental leave</gloss>
+<gloss>paternity leave</gloss>

パパ休暇	89
ぱぱ休暇	< 20
ママ休暇	40

Not that common.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ぱぱきゅうか</reb>
+<reb>パパきゅうか</reb>
@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>common term for parental leave, also mama kyuka</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>parental leave</gloss>

https://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/啤酒

Yes, the Jp Wiktionary entry for 啤酒 doesn't even have a kana reading. The Kotobank site seems to be the only one with ひしゅ. I'll move that headword.

https://kitagawa.ws/tsingtaobeer/
青島啤酒 （チンタオビール） | KITAGAWA.WS

This should prob be merged with 青島ビール based on the google results. The kotobank reading is likely auto-generated and not correct.

(a) this is not in JMdict - it's in a parallel names dictionary (JMnedict) which has nearly 800,000 names including many products.
(b) all 4 kanji are in the JIS standards.
(c) 青島啤酒 appears in quite a lot of Japanese WWW pages. It's reasonable to provide some support for people wanting to look it up, as with the more common 青島ビール, which is a Japanese name for the same product.

This is totally a Chinese brand or word.  It is not even Japanese Kanji.  You cannot find it from any regular Japanese dictionary. The OP refers to https://kotobank.jp/word/青島啤酒-1369102 and the source is from 世界大百科事典 which is an encyclopedia.  Does JMDict now include everything from encyclopedia? If so, you should not call JMDict a dictionary.

This is totally a Chinese brand or word.  It is not even Japanese Kanji.  You cannot find it from any regular Japanese dictionary. The OP refers to https://kotobank.jp/word/青島啤酒-1369102 and the source is from 世界大百科事典 which is an encyclopedia.  Does JMDict now include everything from encyclopedia? If so, you should not call JMDict a dictionary.

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

I don't think the year is needed.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Jitsū (1996 kanji dictionary by Heibonsha Ltd.)</gloss>
+<gloss>Jitsū (kanji dictionary published by Heibonsha)</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/字通-1832360

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Oops. Not valid in the names dictionary.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<re_nokanji/>

https://www.kirin.co.jp/alcohol/umeshu/shinluchu/recipe/shinluchu.html

the kotobank link is to daijs+ which clearly describes a trademarked product. this is not a general term for apricot wine.

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>2853838</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -15,3 +14,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<field>&food;</field>
-<gloss>apricot wine</gloss>
+<misc>&product;</misc>
+<gloss>Shinluchu (apricot wine)</gloss>

杏露酒	19139
シンルチュウ	1197
しんるちゅう	1058

Probably better.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>しんるちゅう</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<re_nokanji/>

https://kotobank.jp/word/杏露酒-1723190
https://kakuteru.jp/material/apricot-wine

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

See discussion on deleted 青島啤酒/5743791 entry.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>青島啤酒</keb>

チンタオビール	3449
チンタオ啤酒	No matches
ちんたおビール	23

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ちんたおビール</reb>
+<reb>チンタオビール</reb>