下卑て	676

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 下卑る │     62 │       │
│ 下びる │      0 │       │
│ げびる │      0 │       │
│ ゲビる │      0 │       │
├─ーーー─┼────────┼───────┤
│ 下卑た │ 12,721 │ 98.0% │
│ 下びた │     27 │  0.2% │
│ げびた │    200 │  1.5% │
│ ゲビた │     33 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

We have a "usu. 〜た/て" note on 大人びる and ひなびる as well.

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<s_inf>卑 is ateji</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="2409210">びる</xref>
+<s_inf>usu. 〜た/て; 卑 is ateji</s_inf>

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<s_inf>卑 is ateji</s_inf>

daijs

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>

shinmeikai has a second sense like "sample dose of medicine," although I don't see it in other refs

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&chem;</field>

Indeed

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>たいちアース</reb>
+<reb>だいちアース</reb>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1385560">接地・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1013500">アース・1</xref>

Reverso. ニッポニカ entry for アース has "... 大地アース  ... ともいう。"

A bit of an outlier, but I think it's worth keeping.

@@ -12,2 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>external (earth) ground</gloss>
-<gloss>signal ground</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1385560">接地・1</xref>
+<field>&elec;</field>
+<misc>&rare;</misc>
+<gloss>earth ground</gloss>

G n-grams: 820

Not in my refs. Is this needed?
Also, I don't think "signal ground" is right.

I don't think "insight" is right. The JEs don't have it.
I'm with Rene on "immediacy". It doesn't seem a good fit.
Adjectival form is 直感的.

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -27 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>insight</gloss>
@@ -29 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>immediacy</gloss>

meikyo

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

not sure i really care for it

イメージでの直観では無く、じっくり考えて解凍している人が多いと感じた。
.
Genius WaEi:
intuition; instinct; immediacy

@@ -27,0 +28 @@
+<gloss>immediacy</gloss>

kyūji

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 答弁　　 │ 1,968,458 │ 99.8% │
│ 答辯　　 │     3,715 │  0.2% │ 🡠 adding (daijs, meikyo, obunsha)
│ とうべん │     1,445 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>答辯</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 麻薬　 │ 882,089 │ 99.4% │
│ 痲薬　 │     287 │  0.0% │ 🡠 rK (daijr/s, koj, etc.)
│ まやく │   4,569 │  0.5% │
│ マヤク │     594 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog

"Opium" is just an example of drug. Don't need it as a gloss.
Changed gloss to singular form. I think "drug" is enough if we lead with "narcotic".
Not [adj-no].

@@ -21,2 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>narcotic drugs</gloss>
@@ -24 +22 @@
-<gloss>opium</gloss>
+<gloss>drug</gloss>

OK. All 14 example sentences are using the verb sense.

gg5, daij, etc.
魅了し	466956	34.9%
魅了する	388007	29.0%
魅了さ	417423	31.2%
魅了が	4051	0.3%
魅了を	11843	0.9%
魅了に	25406	1.9%
魅了の	24788	1.9%

All the examples in the refs are -する. It's also easier to gloss as a verb. I think the 2-sense approach is best.

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<gloss>charm</gloss>
+<gloss>fascination</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -18,3 +22,6 @@
-<gloss>charm</gloss>
-<gloss>fascination</gloss>
-<gloss>casting a spell (on someone)</gloss>
+<gloss>to charm</gloss>
+<gloss>to fascinate</gloss>
+<gloss>to captivate</gloss>
+<gloss>to mesmerize</gloss>
+<gloss>to enthrall</gloss>
+<gloss>to hold spellbound</gloss>

GG5, etc.

I don't think 2 senses are needed.

@@ -16,3 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>fascination</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
@@ -21,3 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>to charm</gloss>
-<gloss>to fascinate</gloss>
-<gloss>to mesmerize</gloss>
+<gloss>charm</gloss>
+<gloss>fascination</gloss>
+<gloss>casting a spell (on someone)</gloss>

[vt]: meikyo, shinmeikai, etc.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

OK

gg5, prog, meikyo

The more I look at this, the more I'm convinced it's just one sense.
Both senses in sankoku could correspond to "admonish". The "懇々と諭す" example for (sankoku's) sense 1 is also used in this GG5 example: "その店の主人は子供たちの盗みの非を懇々と諭した.　The store owner lectured children at length on the wrongs of stealing."

@@ -18,0 +19,5 @@
+<gloss>to make (someone) understand (a fault, mistake, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to reason with</gloss>
+<gloss>to advise</gloss>
+<gloss>to try to persuade</gloss>
+<gloss>to exhort</gloss>
@@ -20,9 +25 @@
-<gloss>to remonstrate</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5s;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>to explain thoroughly</gloss>
-<gloss>to make see the reason (in)</gloss>
-<gloss>to persuade</gloss>
-<gloss>to warn</gloss>
+<gloss>to warn (against doing)</gloss>

sankoku 7e also splits along the same line.

①〔親・先生などが〕よくわかるように（やさしく）言う。「懇々と諭す」
②教えみちびく。「不心得を諭す」

Daijisen: 目下の者に物事の道理をよくわかるように話し聞かせる。納得するように教え導く。
Daijirin: 目下の者に，ことの道理を理解できるように言いきかせる。
Meikyo: 物事の道理（特に、自分の非）がよく分かるように目下の人に言い聞かせる。また、行動の指針を与えて目下の人を教え導く。
Reverso - several of the early matches use "admonish"

We do not "blindly follow the other JEs" at all. There are many entries where we have taken quite different approaches to glosses. If you want to make a case I suggest you avoid weakening it by throwing in anonymous insults.
The JEs are not alone in their translations. All the kokugo explanations are couched as ticking off subordinates to some degree. I see if you drop the sentence you quote into Google Translate it offers: "Like Shiori admonishing a girl, he speaks gently and slowly."  So poor old Googe with its massive NN analysis of parallel texts came up with the wrong translation too.
That said, there is a difference between admonishing and remonstrating on one hand, and explaining and persuading on the other. While no reference does it, I think it's probably appropriate to split it into senses.
The parallels between さとす and さとる are very loose. I know Daijirin comments "「さとる」に対する他動詞" but I think that's stating a contrast rather than an equivalence.

@@ -20,0 +21,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

I'll preface this with a question:
if this is the transitive equivalent of satoru (to understand), why must the glosses be so wildly different?

Here is an example I dug up.
Context: they are on an uninhabited island. they found an unconscious girl, brought her to a cave to safety. She just woke up and seems alarmed
「恐がらなくてもいいのよ‥‥‥別にあなたに危害を加えるつもりで、連れてきたわけじゃないわ」
詩織が少女を諭すように、優しくゆっくりとした口調で話しかける。

I'm sure there are 1000s of other examples just like that outside JE example sentences. It might even be the most common use for this word.
Now, which glosses might fit this sentence?

× to admonish　× to remonstrate　△ to explain thoroughly　△ to make see the reason (in)　○ to persuade　× to warn　○ to reason with　○ to make (someone) understand

ISTM that saito is the only JE here that has the balls to try to actually translate the japanese word. in contrast the modern JEs each trot out a similar parade of synonyms that are only tangentially related to the original word, that only fit one context.

I wish JMDICT would not blindly follow the other JEs when this happens. and boy does it happen a lot.

Food for thought, for this entry, as well as others.

Let's stick with the 500k/1M n-gram thresholds for now. The whole spec and gai families need redoing/revising, but that's something for next year. I'll probably raise an issue on it.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>spec2</re_pri>

I think those are the precise thresholds Johan used to use (and I've mostly adhered to them too I think, picking them up from him)

Without definite thresholds, there's no obvious way to choose between spec1 and spec2.
I don't think it needs to be case-by-case unless A) the term is too recent for the ngrams, or B) a common term and an obscure term share the same kanji form and we want to give priority to the former (to aid lookups).
Any figure is arbitrary but does 500k+ for spec2 and 1m+ for spec1 sound sensible?

The spec1/spec2 pre-dated the m-grams by many years. They started out as tags that indicated they were entries in a certain compact dictionary and hence likely to be reasonably common. I was criticized by the compiler of the dictionary, so I flipped the tags to just "spec". Since then they've become a general "common term" tag.
We could pick on, say, 500k+ for the aggregation of n-gram counts as a guideline, but I think it should be a case-by-case decision.

meikyo, daij

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2173520">然らば・さらば・2</xref>
@@ -13,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>if it be so</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2173520">然らば・さらば・2</xref>

koj, gg5

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

@@ -10,0 +11,6 @@
+<gloss>saying goodbye (to)</gloss>
+<gloss>bidding farewell (to)</gloss>
+<gloss>breaking off (with)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
@@ -12 +18 @@
-<gloss>good-bye</gloss>
+<misc>&pol;</misc>
@@ -13,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>goodbye</gloss>
+<gloss>adieu</gloss>

Mk

@@ -10 +10,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2173520">然らば・さらば・1</xref>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2173520">さらば・1</xref>

No sign お然らば is used. Seems to be more a noun than something you say.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2173520">然らば・さらば・1</xref>

daijr/s

Aligning.

@@ -7,0 +8 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -9 +9,0 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>dangling heavily</gloss>
-<gloss>swaying to and fro</gloss>
+<gloss>dangling</gloss>
+<gloss>swaying</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +15,19 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>(walking) leisurely</gloss>
+<gloss>aimlessly</gloss>
+<gloss>strolling</gloss>
+<gloss>wandering</gloss>
+<gloss>rambling</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>idly</gloss>
+<gloss>lazily</gloss>
+<gloss>leisurely</gloss>
+<gloss>aimlessly</gloss>

koj, daij, gg5

reverso

Doesn't refer to a measure.

@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>preventive measure</gloss>
-<gloss>recurrence prevention</gloss>
-<gloss>relapse prevention</gloss>
+<gloss>preventing recurrence (of)</gloss>
+<gloss>preventing from happening again</gloss>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, Eijiro

シャーチャ	  0

Mainstream mahjong term glossaries don't mention the original Chinese reading.
* https://majandofu.com/mahjong-glossary-shimocha
* https://mahjongcollege.com/term/5645/
* https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/麻雀のルール#プレイヤー

The Encyclopedia Nipponica entry for 麻雀 mentions シャーチャ, but I think having "xiàjiā" in the lsrc field is sufficient.

Probably worthwhile to include the readings in the reference notes since they are ambiguous.

@@ -11,3 +10,0 @@
-<reb>シャーチャ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -19,2 +16,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2752950">上家</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2752960">対面・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752950">上家・かみチャ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752960">対面・トイメン・1</xref>

I wouldn't object if  シャーチャ was dropped.

I don't think a [nokanji] tag on シャーチャ is right since it's just the Chinese reading of 下家 rather than an independent surface form. The corresponding Chinese reading on 上家 (シャンチャ) also doesn't have a [nokanji] tag.

I agree with Paul that these entries would be better without the Chinese readings altogether.

@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<reb>シモチャ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
+<reb>シャーチャ</reb>
@@ -15 +14 @@
-<reb>シャーチャ</reb>
+<reb>シモチャ</reb>
@@ -20,2 +19,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2752950">上家・シャンチャ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2752950">上家・シャンチャ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752950">上家</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752950">上家</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752960">対面・1</xref>

@@ -8,3 +7,0 @@
-<reb>シモチャ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -13,0 +11,4 @@
+<reb>シモチャ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<re_nokanji/>

シャンチャ.  0

See comments on 2752940・下家

@@ -11,3 +10,0 @@
-<reb>シャンチャ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -19,3 +16,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2752940">下家</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2752940">下家</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2752960">対面・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752940">下家・しもチャ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752940">下家・しもチャ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752960">対面・トイメン・1</xref>

Probably シャンチャ should also be [nokanji].

上家 is always read as かみチャ. シャンチャ definitely shouldn't lead.

Adding a "partial" flag to the lsrc, as is the case on 下家.

シモチャ has a [nokanji] tag, so it shouldn't be in the reference note.

Since mahjong is a game played with three other people (上家, 下家, and 対面), maybe a reference to 対面 is appropriate too.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>シャンチャ</reb>
+<reb>かみチャ</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>かみチャ</reb>
+<reb>シャンチャ</reb>
@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2752940">下家・シモチャ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752940">下家</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2752960">対面・1</xref>
@@ -21 +22 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="chi">shàngjiā</lsource>
+<lsource xml:lang="chi" ls_type="part">shàngjiā</lsource>

Messy. We don't split 下家.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2752940">下家・シモチャ</xref>

ペイパイ	0
配牌	31626
はいパイ	24

The ペイパイ reading seems to originate from the 日本大百科全書 entry on weblio. I don't see it used anywhere else.

I also found one club's website that says the Chinese reading is ペュパイ rather than ペイパイ:
https://www.nihon-majan.org/majyanbanoyougo.html

I think Chinese readings for mahjong terms like this are mostly rather dubious and unnecessary.

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ペイパイ</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -15,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>starting tiles</gloss>
+<gloss>initial hand</gloss>

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>dealt tiles (mahjong)</gloss>
+<field>&mahj;</field>
+<gloss>dealt tiles</gloss>

nikk, wiki, 麻雀用語集 (weblio), used in various daijs/daijr 
entries (daijr: 手が悪い
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/配牌

紫馬簾菊		293
ムラサキバレンギク	945

ムラサキバレンギク has a [nokanji] tag

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2800120">紫馬簾菊・ムラサキバレンギク</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2800120">ムラサキバレンギク</xref>

perhaps lsrc

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

This is the most common name for Echinacea.

daijs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_chant

@@ -9,3 +9 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1380300">聖歌・せいか</xref>
-<gloss>chant (religious)</gloss>
+<gloss>(religious) chant</gloss>
@@ -15,2 +13,2 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>cheer (e.g. in cheerleading)</gloss>
+<gloss>chant (in a sports game, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>cheer</gloss>

Daijr, リーダーズ+プラス, n-grams

@@ -9 +9,3 @@
-<gloss>chant</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1380300">聖歌・せいか</xref>
+<gloss>chant (religious)</gloss>
@@ -13 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>cheer (in cheerleading)</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>cheer (e.g. in cheerleading)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/チャント

I don't have a better reference than the Wikipedia article, but I've heard it used in the second sense. Not sure if they are also suru-verbs.

daij, koj
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geographical_feature

Wikipedia's description of a "geographical feature" seems to match the kokugos' definitions for 地物 quite closely.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>natural or man-made objects on the earth's surface (trees, hills, rivers, roads, buildings, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>(geographical) feature (natural or man-made)</gloss>
+<gloss>object</gloss>
+<gloss>entity</gloss>
@@ -16 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>object or structure important in a battle, esp. for concealment</gloss>
+<field>&mil;</field>
+<gloss>ground object (that provides cover or concealment)</gloss>

They don't actually. Eijiro is a rag-tag collection and while OK for fleshing out glosses can't be relied on greatly. The Weblio site points to lots of sources, some good and some quite poor. You need to dig into them and verify them. For example "planimetric feature" means something on a map. Not much help as a gloss for 地物.

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/地物
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=地物

Why don't they work? Most JEs use those terms.

Neither terrestrial nor planimetric work here. I think the previous version was closer to the kokugos.

@@ -12,3 +12 @@
-<gloss>geographical feature</gloss>
-<gloss>terrestrial object</gloss>
-<gloss>planimetric feature</gloss>
+<gloss>natural or man-made objects on the earth's surface (trees, hills, rivers, roads, buildings, etc.)</gloss>

Indeed.

Since オオアラセイトウ has a [nokanji] tag on it, I think we should either use the hiragana form or drop the kanji form from the reference note.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2831845">大紫羅欄花・オオアラセイトウ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2831845">オオアラセイトウ</xref>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>dame's rocket</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +23 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2831845">大紫羅欄花・オオアラセイトウ</xref>

GG5, JWN

Poss uk.

Since オオアラセイトウ has a [nokanji] tag on it, I think we should either use the hiragana form or drop the kanji form from the reference note.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2831845">大紫羅欄花・オオアラセイトウ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2831845">オオアラセイトウ</xref>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/オオアラセイトウ
https://www.kagiken.co.jp/new/kojimachi/hana-murasaki-hanana_large.html
----
Google hits:
ムラサキハナナ:  84k
紫花菜:         49k

An alternative name for Orychophragmus violaceus only.

@@ -16,8 +16,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2831813">花大根・1</xref>
-<gloss>sweet rocket (Hesperis matronalis)</gloss>
-<gloss>dame's violet</gloss>
-<gloss>damask violet</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2831813">花大根・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2831845">大紫羅欄花・オオアラセイトウ</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

GG5 (points to 花大根 entry. I assume it's both senses.)

象亀	814
ゾウガメ	18,788

ゾウガメ has a [nokanji] tag

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2464770">象亀・ゾウガメ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2464770">ゾウガメ</xref>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アルダブラゾウガメ
eij

Almost no hits for "アルダブラ象亀".

Marginal, but I guess it's worth keeping.

We should have a lit gloss. But I'm not sure this is needed as an entry.
There are many variations (済むなら/済んだら/済めば, いらん/いりません/etc., without and without the は). ごめんで済んだら警察はいらない appears to be the most common form on Twitter.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss g_type="lit">if "sorry" were all it took (to settle things), we wouldn't need police</gloss>

Quiet.

I'll approve it pro tempore, then reopen for a bit. Should it be [col]? And would a literal translation help?

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>just saying sorry isn't enough</gloss>

I was going to say "quite a mouthful", but I won't.

I think it needs to be glossed like this.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>vagina with many folds and significant movement during intercourse</gloss>
+<gloss>thousand earthworms (as a description for a vagina that has many folds and provides extraordinary pleasure during intercourse)</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/ミミズ千匹 - 膣内の襞の数が夥しくて、よく動くさまを指す表現。いわゆる名器の一つとされる。

I think it should stay, but getting a succinct gloss is a challenge. I had problems with the first version - once I realized it didn't refer to a cat I thought it meant the visual appearance of someone's pudenda. Reading the Wikipedia entry gives a clearer but rather wordy explanation. I've tried to summarise Jitsuyou's version.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>active female genitalia</gloss>
+<gloss>vagina with many folds and significant movement during intercourse</gloss>

I think it should be kept, but the gloss needs to be understandable which it currently is not.

I'm not yet convinced this is needed. Wikipedia describes it as a "...女性器を形容する言葉".

http://tateno-shika.com/general/perception/001.php
https://moriya-shika.jp/blog/歯が「キーン！」とすることってありませんか？/
https://www.morii-dc.com/blog/浩太先生のお口の疑問解決講座/666/

Teeth as well.

@@ -27,2 +27 @@
-<s_inf>as 頭がキーンとする, 頭がキーンとなる, etc.</s_inf>
-<gloss>with a stinging pain (from an ice-cream headache)</gloss>
+<gloss>with a sharp pain (in the head or teeth after eating or drinking something cold)</gloss>

daijs, prog, luminous

Not a noun.

@@ -14,4 +14,7 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>screech</gloss>
-<gloss>whine</gloss>
-<gloss>high-pitched sound</gloss>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>with a screech</gloss>
+<gloss>with a whine</gloss>
+<gloss>with a shrill</gloss>
+<gloss>with a ringing (in the ears)</gloss>
@@ -20 +23,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -22,2 +26,4 @@
-<gloss>brain freeze headache</gloss>
-<gloss>ice-cream headache</gloss>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<s_inf>as 頭がキーンとする, 頭がキーンとなる, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>with a stinging pain (from an ice-cream headache)</gloss>
+<gloss>getting a brain freeze</gloss>

きーん	21954  - GG5, ルミナス
キーン	161305 - Daijs   (many false positives from names)
きいん	8818 - Daijs
頭がキーン	4075
頭キーン	877
頭がきーん	270
頭きーん	34

This needs to be 3 entries. I'll split キーン, etc. out here and propose the others.

@@ -4,9 +4,6 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>キーン</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>頭がキーン</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>頭キーン</keb>
-</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キーン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>きーん</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -16,6 +13,6 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>あたまがきいん</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>あたまきいん</reb>
-</r_ele>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>screech</gloss>
+<gloss>whine</gloss>
+<gloss>high-pitched sound</gloss>
+</sense>
@@ -25 +22 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>brain freeze headache</gloss>
@@ -27,2 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>brain freeze</gloss>
-<gloss>cold-stimulus headache</gloss>

For "キーン":

* From デジタル大辞泉 via:
https://www.weblio.jp/content/キーン
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/きいん/#jn-300441
See definition #2: "冷たいものを急いで食べたり飲んだりしたときに、頭に痛みを感じるさま。→アイスクリーム頭痛"
* https://www.glico.com/jp/health/contents/bokujoshibori12/
* https://m.facebook.com/nihongoflashcards/posts/2229484497295753/

--------------------------------------
For "頭がキーン":

* https://peta-eri.com/brain-freeze
* https://www.wanikani.com/vocabulary/井戸 (see parallel translation in "Context")

--------------------------------------
For "頭キーン":

* https://www.yorimichi-life.com/ice-cream-headache/
* https://englishnotes.jp/brain-freeze/ (form without が in the examples and summary definition.)* 
* https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=頭キーン (e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJhM5NksKmk (which goes into an explanation of the phenomenon), or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFeh708NRaA which provides a parallel English translation in the title)
* https://twitter.com/search?q=頭キーン&src=typed_query

I can't find much by way of solid established references on the phrasal versions here, especially without "が" as I encountered it, but I came across this term while reading, and some basic searches among colloquial sources (YouTube, Twitter, etc) and some study guides seem to seem to bring up solid evidence for the meaning here with all three readings I'm including.

It seems pretty clear that "頭キーン" comes from "頭がキーン" with "キーン" itself having a good definition in the デジタル大辞泉 (see references) pointing towards "アイスクリーム頭痛" / "ice cream headache"  as a synonym. It calls the part of speech as an adverb though, which seems odd for the headache itself, which I'd think was noun (as "アイスクリーム頭痛" is listed in EDICT, or "ice cream headache" is in English), so I listed it here as such.

Reverso

Odd term - quite common and not in references. Certainly not A+B.

eij

鑑賞券	295885

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/一時雇用
一時雇用（いちじこよう、英: Temporary employment）、臨時雇用（りんじこよう）とは、固定期間契約のもとで仕事を行う雇用形態である。常時雇用の対義語。

I agree.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>臨時的雇用</keb>
+<keb>臨時雇用</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>りんじてきこよう</reb>
+<reb>りんじこよう</reb>

臨時的雇用	535
臨時的な雇用	908
臨時雇用	22135  <- KOD
臨時の雇用	257

Not sure this is a lot of use. Probably better changed to 臨時雇用 which is 40 times more common.

https://kotobank.jp/word/臨時的雇用-3017192

Not sure if there is an official translation for this.

I'll work that into the policy and tidy up the entries.

I agree. Probably worth adding to the editorial policy.

I'm not sure we have a firm policy - probably we should. Some pre-1000 dates don't have "CE", e.g. the 五代十国/五代 entries. 1000 CE seems a reasonable break point.

`grep -E "[0-9]{4} CE" JMdict`
pulls up about a couple dozen glosses on the current JMdict file

I was just going off of 承久の変. That one might need aligning too, if that's the case.

I see plenty of examples of both in online results.

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Daijs
合区	3747

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>merging of administrative or political districts</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>merging of administrative or electoral districts</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/合区-666163
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/合区

I agree.

ビー公	23

Not many WWW hits and most are false positives. I don't think this makes it.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>びいこう</reb>
+<reb>ビーこう</reb>
@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>B-29 bomber (derogatory) (slang)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<gloss>B-29 bomber</gloss>

https://b2b.partcommunity.com/community/knowledge/ja/detail/3737/B-29+(航空機)
http://www2.ttcn.ne.jp/~heikiseikatsu/rekisi/b_kou.htm

This is a historical term, no longer in popular use, but might be nice to include for completeness.

gg5, eij, RP, reverso

提供元企業等に帰属  4681722
Reverso

2/3 of the n-grams are from that stock phrase.

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>provider</gloss>
+<gloss>supplier</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/提供元
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/提供元

提供元	6999427

Unidic (n), RP has it for "dip" (as in "dip in the road"). Reverso has things like "vertical width" which seems very 直訳.

sankoku 7e: 上下の長さ。「文字の━・国旗の━」（↔横幅）

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 縦幅　　 │ 37,204 │ 97.9% │
│ たて幅　 │    401 │  1.1% │
│ タテ幅　 │    352 │  0.9% │
│ たてはば │     32 │  0.1% │
╰─ーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -5,0 +6,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>たて幅</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>タテ幅</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -12 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>???</gloss>
+<gloss>vertical length</gloss>
+<gloss>height</gloss>

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/097f7ab096fbc69a85a872735ae8b8b91ad0c263

@@ -14,0 +15,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カスティージョ</reb>

カスティーリョ	2120
カスティヨ	66
カスティーヨ	3108
カスティリョ	80

Merging the others.

@@ -5,0 +6,9 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カスティーリョ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カスティリョ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カスティヨ</reb>

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&surname;</misc>

Merged

Merged

@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&male;</misc>
+<misc>&surname;</misc>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Gotoba (emporer)</gloss>
+<gloss>Gotoba (emperor)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Go Toba</gloss>
+<gloss>Gotoba (emporer)</gloss>

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
-<gloss>Gotobain</gloss>
+<misc>&person;</misc>
+<gloss>ex-Emperor Gotoba</gloss>

OK. Aligning.

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
-<gloss>Gotobajoukou</gloss>
+<misc>&person;</misc>
+<gloss>Emperor Gotoba (1180-1239 CE, reigning: 1183-1198 CE)</gloss>

後鳥羽	        18504	  
後鳥羽上皇	15111	   
後鳥羽天皇	3780  <- in jmnedict

Interesting that this is more common than 後鳥羽天皇. Might be worth keeping.

後鳥羽(後鳥羽天皇)+上皇

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Emperor Go-Toba</gloss>
-<gloss>Go-Toba Tenno (1180-1239 CE, reigning: 1183-1198 CE)</gloss>
+<gloss>Emperor Gotoba</gloss>
+<gloss>Gotoba Tenno (1180-1239 CE, reigning: 1183-1198 CE)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Gotobatennoukasouzuka</gloss>
+<gloss>cremation mound of Emperor Gotoba</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Gotobatennouryou</gloss>
+<gloss>tomb of Emperor Gotoba</gloss>