I agree with Robin. We could add "(disease, pandemic)" but it's not really needed.

@@ -23,5 +22,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>COVID-19</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -31 +26 @@
-<gloss>COVID-19 pandemic</gloss>
+<gloss>COVID-19</gloss>

I agree it doesn't have to be a separate sense or gloss, but I think we might as well spell it out, that yes, the word is used like this in Japanese too.

I don't think this needs to be a separate sense or gloss. The meaning is clear from context. "Covid" is used like this in English as well.

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/489759c4f2a179858adfbd5cea2edb9d8693b9e5?page=2
「コロナが落ち着いたらやりたいこと」を尋ねたアンケート調査 では、カラオケは旅行や外食などに次いで8番目に高く、帰省などを上回る水準となるなど、底堅い需要があったためだ。
(one of billion examples)

Could be a second gloss on the third sense, but that screws with calling it an abbr of 新型コロナウイルス感染症
not sure what to call this sense 4 an abbr of. コロナ過 is maybe the closest?

enwiki has one article for COVID-19 and a separate one for the COVID-19 pandemic. The Japanese articles linked to these are 新型コロナウイルス感染症 (2019年) and 新型コロナウイルス感染症の世界的流行_(2019年-)

@@ -24,0 +25,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2845216">コロナ禍</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>COVID-19 pandemic</gloss>

etym split

@@ -15,5 +14,0 @@
-<sense>
-<stagr>ボルト</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>bolt</gloss>
-</sense>

gg5

@@ -10,0 +11,2 @@
+<gloss>labor force</gloss>
+<gloss>workers</gloss>

JEs

マンパワー	107985
マン・パワー	602

Commonly one word.

@@ -8,3 +7,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>マン・パワー</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -13 +10 @@
-<gloss>man power</gloss>
+<gloss>manpower</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マン・パワー</reb>
+</r_ele>

daijr

Splitting into senses.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -22 +21,4 @@
-<gloss>unit's position</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>units position (of a number)</gloss>

Yes, that seems to make the most sense.

@@ -17,4 +16,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>イチイ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
@@ -22 +17,0 @@
-<stagr>いちい</stagr>
@@ -28,6 +22,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<s_inf>usu. イチイ, also 櫟</s_inf>
-<gloss>Japanese yew (Taxus cuspidata)</gloss>

Can't we just add 一位 to 2264890?

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>１次</keb>

I agree,

gg5, prog, daij

Splitting into senses.
Although this is a noun according to the kokugos, I believe senses 2 and 3 are always prenominal.

@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -15,2 +14,11 @@
-<gloss>primary</gloss>
-<gloss>linear (equation)</gloss>
+<gloss>preliminary</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<gloss>primary (sources, industry, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>original</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<field>&math;</field>
+<gloss>linear (function, equation)</gloss>

Bulk update: Adjusting POS details
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>１次元</keb>
@@ -12 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>one dimensional</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>one dimension</gloss>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>counter for long and narrow things such as guns, scissors, spades, hoes, inksticks, palanquins, candles, jinrikishas, shamisen, oars, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>counter for long and narrow things such as guns, scissors, spades, hoes, inksticks, palanquins, candles, jinrikishas, shamisen, oars</gloss>

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1427240">丁・3</xref>

OK. I need to fix a couple of sentences.

daijr: ちょう【挺・梃・丁】
はさみ一丁	34
はさみ一挺	No matches
鉄砲一丁	        87
鉄砲一挺	        47

丁 isn't rare, it's the most common kanji for this counter. The reason it was in a note is that we already have this sense on 丁/ちょう (1427240). But I see no reason to split up the kanji forms. Daijr and daijs don't.
I suggest leading with 丁 on this entry and dropping sense 3 from 1427240.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>挺</keb>
+<keb>丁</keb>
@@ -10 +10 @@
-<keb>梃</keb>
+<keb>挺</keb>
@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<keb>丁</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>梃</keb>

I'd prefer it like this

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>丁</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -19,2 +23 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1427240">丁・ちょう・3</xref>
-<s_inf>also 丁</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="1427240">丁・3</xref>

Top 10 N-grams Lookup for 換気の (Frequency Order)
換気の	67331	  
換気のため	8069	  
換気の良い	5780	  
換気のために	3851	  
換気の悪い	2730	  
換気の必要	2421	  
換気の良い場所	2079	  
換気のための	1977	  
換気の為	1876	  
換気の良い場所で	1802	  
換気のよい	1612

I don't think this is adj-no

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Correct POS order
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -20 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone

I think "mobile phone" should lead.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>mobile phone</gloss>
@@ -15 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>mobile phone</gloss>

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>mobile telephone</gloss>
-<gloss>cellular telephone</gloss>
+<gloss>cell phone</gloss>
+<gloss>mobile phone</gloss>

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

G n-grams 18885478

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Perhaps "yourself" or "your good self" would work.
座右の is often used for "favourite". I'm not sure that's clear from sense 1, but then the JEs don't make it explicit either.

daij, meikyo

I don't think we should use "you" for a term that's supposed to be an indirect way of addressing someone.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>nearby location</gloss>
@@ -23 +22 @@
-<gloss>area by one's hand</gloss>
+<gloss>place within arm's reach</gloss>
@@ -28,2 +27 @@
-<s_inf>epistolary style; sometimes also used as the name of the recipient</s_inf>
-<gloss>you</gloss>
+<gloss>used in letters to refer to the recipient indirectly or written beside an addressee's name to show respect</gloss>

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<s_inf>epistolary style, sometimes also used as the name of the recipient</s_inf>
+<s_inf>epistolary style; sometimes also used as the name of the recipient</s_inf>

@@ -27 +26,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>(by) one's side</gloss>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>４次元</keb>
@@ -14,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>4D</gloss>

I have to say I agree with Robin. All sorts of adjectives can be used that way. It doesn't mean they are another sense of the term.

@@ -65,5 +64,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&int;</pos>
-<gloss>well said! (of a pun)</gloss>
-<gloss>that's a good one!</gloss>

https://news.mynavi.jp/article/20130114-a027/
ダジャレとか言ったら、すぐに“うまい！”って言っちゃう。だって本当に面白いんだもん。

@@ -68,0 +69 @@
+<gloss>that's a good one!</gloss>

It's not wrong but I don't think it's needed. We rarely have int senses on adjective entries.

Reference??

@@ -65,0 +66,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<gloss>well said! (of a pun)</gloss>
+</sense>

something, not someone

@@ -35 +35,3 @@
-<gloss>to take</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to take (something) along</gloss>
+<gloss>to bring with one</gloss>

G n-grams:
持っていく	1198805
持って行く	 530237
もって行く	  56080
持ってゆく	  21807
もっていく	 179236
もってゆく	   5904

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<keb>もって行く</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -18,0 +22 @@
+<re_restr>もって行く</re_restr>
@@ -24,0 +29 @@
+<re_restr>もって行く</re_restr>

GG5: 	a woman doctor 《【複】 women doctors》; a lady doctor.

Despite GG5 et al. I think we can just have the slightly more neutral term.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>woman doctor</gloss>

"Woman doctor" seems kind of a degrading and inconsiderate definition. Also, female doctor seems more accurate too which is why I added it as a definition.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>female doctor</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>New Year's party (held in the beginning of a new year, i.e. usually in January)</gloss>
+<gloss>New Year's party (held in the beginning of the year, i.e. usually in January)</gloss>

https://www.anniversary-cruise.com/cruising-navi/newyearparty/73400/
新年会は、字のとおり、新しい年を迎えて行う会合です。 そのため、一般的には1月中に行うのが良いとされています。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shinnenkai

not a New Year's Eve party but one held in January

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>New Year's party</gloss>
+<gloss>New Year's party (held in the beginning of a new year, i.e. usually in January)</gloss>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5

@@ -17 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>becoming more serious or severe (problem)</gloss>
+<gloss>becoming more serious or severe</gloss>
+<gloss>aggravation</gloss>
+<gloss>intensification</gloss>

Aligning.
I don't think センバツ is used for sense 1.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<re_nokanji/>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -30,2 +30,3 @@
-<s_inf>esp. センバツ</s_inf>
-<gloss>National Invitational High-School Baseball Tournament</gloss>
+<s_inf>oft. written as センバツ</s_inf>
+<gloss>National High School Baseball Invitational Tournament</gloss>
+<gloss>Spring Koshien</gloss>

GG5 - has it as a sense.

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>センバツ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>
@@ -20,0 +25,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2621060">選抜高等学校野球大会</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<s_inf>esp. センバツ</s_inf>
+<gloss>National Invitational High-School Baseball Tournament</gloss>

センバツ	180804
センバツ出場	16452

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/pickup/6416617
センバツ“不可解選考”にネット炎上
https://www.nikkansports.com/baseball/highschool/news/202201290000023.html
【一覧】センバツ出場32校完全データ　戦力評価、主なＯＢ・ＯＧ付き

センバツ is common to refer to koshien as I understand it.
could be an abbr 2nd sense xreffed to 選抜高等学校野球大会, maybe?

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

@@ -134,0 +135,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5t;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<field>&shogi;</field>
+<gloss>to drop (a piece)</gloss>
+</sense>

nikk doesn't explicitly say they only apply to the first sense and even if they might not apply in equal measure to each and every sense, we're already signalling they're barely/only rarely used with the rK in the first place, so I think this is fine for now.

@@ -8,0 +9,16 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>拍つ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>搏つ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>撲つ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>擣つ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -19 +34,0 @@
-<s_inf>also written as 拍つ, 搏つ, 撲つ, 擣つ</s_inf>

Nikk doesn't seem to say so?

Don't they only apply to sense 1? If they go in as "rK" kanji forms we'd need 打つ as a restriction on the 14 other senses.
I'd put them in their own entry.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>第１章</keb>

mk

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>stormy passage</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +27 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -25,0 +29,2 @@
+<gloss>running into trouble</gloss>
+<gloss>proceeding with difficulty</gloss>
@@ -27,2 +31,0 @@
-<gloss>running into trouble</gloss>
-<gloss>stormy passage</gloss>

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>２次</keb>

gg5, prog, daij

Splitting into senses.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16 +17,4 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>second</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -18 +22,6 @@
-<gloss>subordinate</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<field>&math;</field>
+<gloss>quadratic (function, equation, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>second-order</gloss>

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>２次会</keb>

daij

I don't think "same" is needed.
Daijr/s have a second sense.

@@ -16,2 +16,6 @@
-<gloss>afterparty</gloss>
-<gloss>second party of the same night</gloss>
+<gloss>after-party</gloss>
+<gloss>second party (of the night)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>second meeting</gloss>

wiki leads w this

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>２次元</keb>

Looks fine. Thanks.

I think sense 2 should be adj-no without n. 二次元の彼女 yes, but I'm not sure 二次元 by itself, as a noun, has any specific anime meaning, I think it's weird to gloss it as "character" or "world"...

Also I don't think that sense is really net-sl, sl or even col?

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -19,3 +20,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&net-sl;</misc>
-<gloss>characters in anime, manga, video games, etc.</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>fictional (in relation to anime, manga, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>drawn</gloss>
+<gloss>two-dimensional</gloss>

Daijs (sense 2): (主にアニメーションファンの間で）アニメやテレビゲームなどのキャラクター。印刷物やディスプレーなどの平面に表示されることから。→二・五次元 →三次元
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/二次元/

Maybe this?

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>fictional world of anime, manga, video games, etc.</gloss>
+<gloss>characters in anime, manga, video games, etc.</gloss>

I copied it from the English Wiktionary. Maybe it was a Chinese usage just like the term "ACG" (referring to the Japanese subculture represented by anime, comic (= manga), and video games)

I suggest making it rK.
(I think "demoting" it to a note actually ends up making it more prominent)

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>偽物</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -17 +20,0 @@
-<s_inf>also written 偽物</s_inf>

Daijr, GG5, etc. N-grams (confirms "uk")

I know 大辞泉 has 偽物 in its いかもの entry, but no-one else has. Kojien points out it's an abbreviation of 如何様物, which make the いかもの reading of 偽物 a bit unlikely. I suggest demoting it to a note.

@@ -10,4 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>偽物</keb>
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -18,0 +15,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1577800">偽物・にせもの</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>also written 偽物</s_inf>
@@ -19,0 +19,9 @@
+<gloss>forgery</gloss>
+<gloss>counterfeit</gloss>
+<gloss>imitation</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>unusual item</gloss>
+<gloss>something strange</gloss>

whoops, meant daijisen, not daijr

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

year→term

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>Fire Horse (43rd year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1906, 1966, 2026)</gloss>
+<gloss>Fire Horse (43rd term of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1906, 1966, 2026)</gloss>

Let them look it up!  8-)}

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1650120">干支・1</xref>

"renowned for disasters and the birth of women destined to kill their husbands"
Do we want to mention this as well?

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>43rd year of the sexagenary cycle (year of the Fire Horse, renowned for disasters and the birth of women destined to kill their husbands)</gloss>
+<gloss>Fire Horse (43rd year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1906, 1966, 2026)</gloss>

emeritus professor 164246
professor emeritus 649287

Both are used.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>emeritus professor</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>emeritus professor</gloss>
+<gloss>professor emeritus</gloss>

うつ病の	288049	  
うつ病の症状	28958	  
うつ病の治療	25663	  
うつ病の人	16299	  
うつ病の方	10495	  
うつ病の妻	8733	  
うつ病の原因	6962	  
うつ病の治療が	6289	  
うつ病のこと	5929	  
うつ病の悩み	5086	  
うつ病の患者	5082	  
https://president.jp/articles/-/41574
自閉症の息子と鬱病の夫、体が不自由な実母・義母との5人同居生活

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

うつ病	1910683
鬱病	369525
ウツ病	12767
欝病	6984

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -16,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,3 +19,0 @@
-<re_restr>うつ病</re_restr>
-<re_restr>鬱病</re_restr>
-<re_restr>欝病</re_restr>
@@ -24,4 +20,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ウツびょう</reb>
-<re_restr>ウツ病</re_restr>

http://www.edrdg.org/jmdictdb/cgi-bin/edhelp.py?svc=jmdict&sid=#kw_fld

Nouns here is the rule ("anat" probably should be amended.)

"Medicine term" -> "Medical term"

打ち止め	119904
撃ち止め	555
討ち止め	No matches

Given how uncommen 撃ち止める and 討ち止める are, I don't think the x-refs are needed.

@@ -33,2 +33 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2853610">撃ち止める・うちとめる</xref>
-<gloss>to kill</gloss>
+<gloss>to kill (with a gun, sword, etc.)</gloss>

OK, it's quite a mess. Here a split.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>撃ち止める</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -14,6 +10,0 @@
-<keb>討ち止める</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>撃止める</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -21,3 +11,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>討止める</keb>
@@ -32,4 +19,0 @@
-<stagk>打ち止める</stagk>
-<stagk>打ち留める</stagk>
-<stagk>打止める</stagk>
-<stagk>打留める</stagk>
@@ -41,4 +24,0 @@
-<stagk>打ち止める</stagk>
-<stagk>打ち留める</stagk>
-<stagk>打止める</stagk>
-<stagk>打留める</stagk>
@@ -53 +33 @@
-<s_inf>撃ち止める refers esp. to a gun, and 討ち止める to a blade</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="2853610">撃ち止める・うちとめる</xref>

撃ち止める	100
打ち止める	336
打ち留める	54
討ち止める	No matches
撃止める	No matches
打止める	31
討止める	No matches
打留める	No matches

removing freq tags.

sense 1 and 2 look quite messy. gg5 has 討ち止める・撃ち止める, not the others. daijr does have 打（ち）止める・打（ち）留める】 with a note on the kill sense: （多く「撃ち止める」「討ち止める」と書く）. Could we split out the 3rd sense, maybe? Or just move the 討ち止める and 撃止める to the note? They're obviously not common to begin with based on the ngrams

@@ -6,2 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf09</ke_pri>
@@ -32,2 +29,0 @@
-<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf09</re_pri>

悔やしい	727

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>悔やしい</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

"envious" is not showing up in references. I don't think the case for adding is strong. It would have to a different sense, anyway.

@@ -31 +30,0 @@
-<gloss>envious</gloss>

誰かが自分より優れているときに使われる「悔しい」というのは妬む = to envy というのが適切だと思います。

@@ -30,0 +31 @@
+<gloss>envious</gloss>

OK. Done.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,4 +18,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>くちおしい</reb>
-<re_restr>口惜しい</re_restr>

悔しい	1908510
口惜しい	45087
くちおしい	418


mk says 口惜しい is やや古い言い方 - and 口惜しい is an rK for くやしい, but of not for くちおしい. Could we split out くちおしい 
 into it's own entry with a [dated] tag and tag 口惜しい in this entry as rK?

Seems to be a superfluous ; in the meaning.

@@ -35 +35 @@
-<gloss>to take (someone; to a place)</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (someone to a place)</gloss>

gg5

Yes. We put the direct object in brackets.
I think this is clearer. "(someone, somewhere)" could be read as "someone OR somewhere".

@@ -35,3 +35,4 @@
-<gloss>to take (someone, somwhere)</gloss>
-<gloss>to take (someone) along</gloss>
-<gloss>to lead (someone) away</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (someone; to a place)</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (someone) with one</gloss>
+<gloss>to take along</gloss>
+<gloss>to lead away</gloss>

brackets around "someone" as it's vt, right?

@@ -34,3 +34,4 @@
-<gloss>to take someone (to some place)</gloss>
-<gloss>to take someone along</gloss>
-<gloss>to lead someone away</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to take (someone, somwhere)</gloss>
+<gloss>to take (someone) along</gloss>
+<gloss>to lead (someone) away</gloss>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1599000">取り扱い説明書・とりあつかいせつめいしょ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1599000">取り扱い説明書</xref>

取説	279337
取り説	54004
とりせつ	691
トリセツ	38939
https://president.jp/articles/-/40680
めんどくさい人のトリセツその1：矢継ぎ早に詰問してくる人

@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>トリセツ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

G n-grams:
取説	279337
取り説	54004

Indeed.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>instruction manual</gloss>

取説 is more common

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>取り説</keb>
+<keb>取説</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>取説</keb>
+<keb>取り説</keb>

matching apostrophe usage at 取り扱い説明書

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>users' manual</gloss>
+<gloss>user's manual</gloss>

year→term

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>Wood Rat (1st year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1924, 1984, 2044)</gloss>
+<gloss>Wood Rat (1st term of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1924, 1984, 2044)</gloss>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>Wood Rat (first year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1924, 1984, 2044)</gloss>
+<gloss>Wood Rat (1st year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1924, 1984, 2044)</gloss>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>year of the Wood Rat (first year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1924, 1984, 2044)</gloss>
+<gloss>Wood Rat (first year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1924, 1984, 2044)</gloss>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>year of the Wood Rat (1st year of the sexagenary cycle)</gloss>
+<gloss>year of the Wood Rat (first year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1924, 1984, 2044)</gloss>

Removing the tags. Not sure of the order of readings, but it's not a big deal.

@@ -6,2 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf03</ke_pri>
@@ -11,2 +8,0 @@
-<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf03</re_pri>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>３時</keb>

Aligning like that makes sense.

Could be but I was following the format of 一次 and 二次. The first sense refers specifically to occurrences (i.e. third time).

should third and tertiary be the same sense?

gg5

Splitting into senses.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16,2 +17,11 @@
-<gloss>three times</gloss>
-<gloss>cubic</gloss>
+<gloss>third</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<gloss>tertiary</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<field>&math;</field>
+<gloss>cubic (function, equation, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>third-order</gloss>

wiktionary: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/読み切り

Common in manga contexts.

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<gloss>one-shot</gloss>

gg5, koj

"complete novel" is 読み切り小説.
Not "punctuation" for sense 3. Koj redirects to 句読 sense 1.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>読切り</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -10,3 +12,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>読切り</keb>
@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -25,2 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>non-serialised stories (e.g. in magazines)</gloss>
-<gloss>complete novel</gloss>
+<gloss>non-serialised story (e.g. in a magazine)</gloss>
+<gloss>complete story</gloss>
@@ -30 +28,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -32 +30 @@
-<gloss>punctuation</gloss>
+<gloss>breaks and pauses (in a sentence)</gloss>

G n-grams:

手焙り	452
手あぶり	4312

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>手焙り</keb>
+<keb>手あぶり</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>手あぶり</keb>
+<keb>手焙り</keb>

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>手あぶり</keb>

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>meat, fish or vegetables preserved in miso:</gloss>
+<gloss>meat, fish or vegetables preserved in miso</gloss>

The JEs just have the substance.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>meat, fish or vegetables preserved in miso:</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>meat, fish or vegetables preserved in miso</gloss>

daij

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>味噌づけ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +18,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1527040">味噌・1</xref>
+<field>&food;</field>
+<gloss>preserving in miso</gloss>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>meat or fish or vegetables preserved in miso</gloss>
+<gloss>meat, fish or vegetables preserved in miso</gloss>

順送り	12191
順送	6335

https://www.m2-p.com/thomson
テーブル送りの順送機を得意としておりますので
https://www.takahashi-works.jp/progressive.html
順送プレスとは?
順送り金型と呼ばれる専用の型を使い行うプレス加工の方法。順送プレス以外にも、プログレやPRGという名称もあります。複数のプレス加工における工程の凹凸がひとつの金型の中に作られており、ロール状の長いコイル材をプレス機にセットしてゆっくりと順送りすることで加工を行います。

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>順送</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>sending along</gloss>
-<gloss>passing along</gloss>
+<gloss>passing along (in order)</gloss>
+<gloss>sending on</gloss>

gg5: passing sth on (in order).

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>sending or passing along</gloss>
+<gloss>sending along</gloss>
+<gloss>passing along</gloss>

We're making them simpler.

@@ -12,5 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>山勘</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ヤマかん</reb>
-<re_restr>ヤマ勘</re_restr>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
山勘	13906
ヤマ勘	4079

seen it in cc a couple times

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ヤマ勘</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_restr>山勘</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヤマかん</reb>
+<re_restr>ヤマ勘</re_restr>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1302680">山・やま・6</xref>

山勘	13906
やまかん	17632
GG5 (uses kana), etc.

Noun glosses.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>hunch</gloss>

Best as the leading gloss.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>sometimes also refers to a lunisolar calendar</s_inf>
+<gloss>lunisolar calendar</gloss>

I feel that the note isn't a note on usage but should be a gloss or a separate sense.

曆 appears to be illegal in wwwjdic:
 太陰暦; 太陰(oK) 【たいいんれき】 (n) (sometimes also refers to a lunisolar 
calendar) (See 太陰太陽暦) lunar calendar [G][GI][S][A][W] [JW] [G][GI][S][A][W] [JW]

@@ -6,4 +6,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>太陰曆</keb>
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

gg5

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>symbolical</gloss>

year→term

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>Earth Snake (6th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1929, 1989, 2049)</gloss>
+<gloss>Earth Snake (6th term of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1929, 1989, 2049)</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>year of the Earth Snake (6th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1929, 1989, 2049)</gloss>
+<gloss>Earth Snake (6th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1929, 1989, 2049)</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>year of the Earth Snake (6th year of the sexagenary cycle)</gloss>
+<gloss>year of the Earth Snake (6th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1929, 1989, 2049)</gloss>

Daijr 3.0 only has きし, with つちのとみ given as a meaning. That's why I preferred it, but I'm really not fussed.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>きし</reb>
+<reb>つちのとみ</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>つちのとみ</reb>
+<reb>きし</reb>

I'm happy to align all of them either way, but I think we should decide if it's the onyomi or kunyomi that comes first for all of these.
in the 甲子 entry, Rene said 
"pretty sure きのえね is most common (e.g. the only one that meikyo has and the one that wiki lists first) so listing it first and moving the usage tags"
but on the other hand, daijs only has actual entries for かっし, and then mention こうし and きのえね in the description, e.g.:
１ 干支 (えと) の一。こうし。きのえね。
daijr does have entries for all 3 (at weblio - impossible to tell now at kotobank because the recent horrible "re-design")
jitsuyo only has きのえね
難読語辞典 only has こうし

searching for 丙午, the one that's seen a lot of discussion because of low birth rates, everyone seems to be calling it ひのえうま and nothing else
 (most provide hiragana)

on balance, Rene was maybe right, and if so, つちのとみ should come first here as well?

year→term

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>Water Ox (50th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1913, 1973, 2033)</gloss>
+<gloss>Water Ox (50th term of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1913, 1973, 2033)</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>50th of the sexagenary cycle</gloss>
+<gloss>Water Ox (50th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1913, 1973, 2033)</gloss>

wiki

all the rest are going in with the japanese reading first; i see no reason to change

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>きちゅう</reb>
+<reb>みずのとうし</reb>
@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<reb>みずのとのうし</reb>
+<reb>きちゅう</reb>
@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1650120">干支</xref>

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>みずのとのうし</reb>
+</r_ele>

year→term

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>Water Sheep (20th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1943, 2003, 2063)</gloss>
+<gloss>Water Sheep (20th term of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1943, 2003, 2063)</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>Water Sheep (20th of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1943, 2003, 2063)</gloss>
+<gloss>Water Sheep (20th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1943, 2003, 2063)</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>20th of the sexagenary cycle</gloss>
+<gloss>Water Sheep (20th of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1943, 2003, 2063)</gloss>

wiki

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>きび</reb>
+<reb>みずのとひつじ</reb>
@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<reb>みずのとのひつじ</reb>
+<reb>きび</reb>
@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1650120">干支</xref>

twenty is enough for now

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>みずのとのひつじ</reb>
+</r_ele>

子供連れ	358311	83.6%
子ども連れ	65991	15.4%
こども連れ	4104	1.0%
こどもづれ	85	0.0%

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

子連れ	3056289
子供連れ 	358311
子ども連れ	65991
こども連れ	4104



https://president.jp/articles/-/42228?page=6
その一方で、厚生労働省のウェブサイト上で公開されている『子ども虐待対応の手引き』の第2章「発生予防」には、虐待が発生しうる「リスキーな家庭環境」として他の要因とともに「子ども連れの再婚家庭」があげられています。

Aligning w 子連れ

maybe this and 子連れ should have adj-no on sense 1?

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>子ども連れ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>こども連れ</keb>
@@ -12 +18,5 @@
-<gloss>accompanied by children</gloss>
+<gloss>taking one's children along (to an event, into a new marriage, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>parent with child</gloss>

An old romaji conversion problem.

Just changed the reading from こどもずれ to こどもづれ.
連れ reading is づれ and since ずれ sounds the same, I assumed it is a mistake because in all other combinations of something with 連れ the reading uses づれ.

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>こどもずれ</reb>
+<reb>こどもづれ</reb>

刺を通ずる	No matches
刺を通じる	No matches

I don't think that note is needed in an already obsc entry.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<s_inf>also 刺を通じる</s_inf>

I'll add a note about 刺を通じる.

@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<s_inf>also 刺を通じる</s_inf>

i'm sure there's nothing wrong with that version, but this is the one that all the 
kokugos have

@@ -5,1 +5,1 @@
-<keb>刺を通じる</keb>
+<keb>刺を通ずる</keb>
@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>しをつうじる</reb>
+<reb>しをつうずる</reb>
@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vz;</pos>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

It's in gg5, but it has a mere 47 googits

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

year→term

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Metal Boar (48th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1911, 1971, 2031)</gloss>
+<gloss>Metal Boar (48th term of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1911, 1971, 2031)</gloss>

since I went with "year of the Boar"

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Metal Pig (48th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1911, 1971, 2031)</gloss>
+<gloss>Metal Boar (48th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1911, 1971, 2031)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1650120">干支・1</xref>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>48th of the sexagenary cycle</gloss>
+<gloss>Metal Pig (48th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1911, 1971, 2031)</gloss>

jitsuyo

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ひのとい</reb>

year→term

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Fire Boar (24th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1947, 2007, 2067)</gloss>
+<gloss>Fire Boar (24th term of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1947, 2007, 2067)</gloss>

since I went with "year of the Boar"

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Fire Pig (24th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1947, 2007, 2067)</gloss>
+<gloss>Fire Boar (24th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1947, 2007, 2067)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1650120">干支・1</xref>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>24th of the sexagenary cycle</gloss>
+<gloss>Fire Pig (24th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1947, 2007, 2067)</gloss>

year→term

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>Fire Rooster (34th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1957, 2017, 2077)</gloss>
+<gloss>Fire Rooster (34th term of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1957, 2017, 2077)</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>Fire Rooster (34th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 2057, 2017, 2077)</gloss>
+<gloss>Fire Rooster (34th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1957, 2017, 2077)</gloss>

@@ -16,2 +16 @@
-<gloss>34th of the sexagenary cycle</gloss>
-<gloss>thirty-fourth of the sexagenary cycle</gloss>
+<gloss>Fire Rooster (34th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 2057, 2017, 2077)</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +15,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1650120">干支</xref>

wiki

@@ -8,1 +8,1 @@
-<reb>ひのとのとり</reb>
+<reb>ひのととり</reb>

year→term

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>Earth Dragon (5th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1928, 1988, 2048)</gloss>
+<gloss>Earth Dragon (5th term of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1928, 1988, 2048)</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>year of the Earth Dragon (5th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1928, 1988, 2048)</gloss>
+<gloss>Earth Dragon (5th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1928, 1988, 2048)</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>year of the Earth Dragon (fifth year of the sexagenary cycle)</gloss>
+<gloss>year of the Earth Dragon (5th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1928, 1988, 2048)</gloss>

daijs wiki

Hm. Rene placed these kunyomi before onyomi in Scott's submissions, but is it really right? Wikipedia does the same thing.
But of course even today we speak of the boshin war (1868), not the tsuchinoetatsu war.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>つちのえたつ</reb>
+</r_ele>

year→term

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Earth Dog (35th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1958, 2018, 2078)</gloss>
+<gloss>Earth Dog (35th term of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1958, 2018, 2078)</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1650120">干支・1</xref>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>35th of the sexagenary cycle</gloss>
+<gloss>Earth Dog (35th year of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1958, 2018, 2078)</gloss>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<field>&food;</field>

* https://www.tasteatlas.com/basashi
* https://www.halfwayanywhere.com/asia/japan/basashi-eating-raw-horse-meat/
* https://www.atlasobscura.com/foods/basashi-horse-meat

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>basashi</gloss>

Link to general meat term

@@ -16,0 +16,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1298490">桜肉</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1298490">桜肉</xref>

I don't think "one's" adds anything.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>(one's) family environment</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>family environment</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Uone's) family environment</gloss>
+<gloss>(one's) family environment</gloss>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>one's family (home) background (environment)</gloss>
+<gloss>Uone's) family environment</gloss>
+<gloss>home environment</gloss>

dupe

"継親" site:ac.jp "ままおや" 6 googits
"継親" site:ac.jp "けいしん"　2 googits (1 false hit)

Maybe it's ebtter if ままおや leads for now.

@@ -6,0 +7,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>まま親</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ままおや</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,3 +15 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ままおや</reb>
+<re_restr>継親</re_restr>

継親	669
まま親	2410

Judging from the ngrams alone, it appears that ままおや is the more common reading. But it's hard to draw conclusions from these relatively low counts.

https://www.nhk.jp/p/osaka-nessisen/ts/X4X48GXNX2/episode/te/89796K66XR/
This was the documentary. The main voice over said けいしん. At least 2 people in different interviews also pronounced it like this. From this, it seems けいしん is the main reading today, but this isn't yet reflected in the kokugos. We're more agile than them so I think けいしん should lead.

Given that almost all the references only have ままおや, I think it should lead.

I agree.

"継親" site:ac.jp "ままおや" 6 googits
"継親" site:ac.jp "けいしん"　2 googits (1 false hit)

Maybe it's ebtter if ままおや leads for now.

@@ -6,0 +7,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>まま親</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ままおや</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,3 +15 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ままおや</reb>
+<re_restr>継親</re_restr>

継親	669
まま親	2410

Judging from the ngrams alone, it appears that ままおや is the more common reading. But it's hard to draw conclusions from these relatively low counts.

https://www.nhk.jp/p/osaka-nessisen/ts/X4X48GXNX2/episode/te/89796K66XR/
This was the documentary. The main voice over said けいしん. At least 2 people in different interviews also pronounced it like this. From this, it seems けいしん is the main reading today, but this isn't yet reflected in the kokugos. We're more agile than them so I think けいしん should lead.

Given that almost all the references only have ままおや, I think it should lead.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

@@ -14,0 +15,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<misc>&id;</misc>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Indeed. And it's helpful to know when the same idiom is used in both English and Japanese. The kokugos have this as an entry.

We don't usually exclude idiomatic expressions or sayings based on them being obvious to an English speaker (or straightforward translations of an English expression)

Isn't this idiom a little too obvious? You could say the same in English and people would immediately understand it.

I wouldn't say it's joc.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<misc>&joc;</misc>
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
@@ -15 +16 @@
-<gloss>to stay on the bench during a sports match</gloss>
+<gloss>to stay on the bench (as a substitute)</gloss>

[sports]?

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&joc;</misc>

gg5
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/循環器科

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>cardiology</gloss>
+<gloss>cardiac ward</gloss>
+<gloss>cardiology ward</gloss>
+<gloss>cardiovascular clinic</gloss>

Entry created

Looks good.

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q10247484280
https://okwave.jp/qa/q3939723.html
https://www.quora.com/What-happens-when-a-curse-or-spell-backfires-in-witchcraft-or-black-magic

I think the context here is "magic". This term is used by people who believe in the occult.
Pretty sure it should be "backfire", not "backlash".

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<gloss>backlash from using magic (e.g. in a game)</gloss>
+<gloss>backfire (of a spell, curse, etc.)</gloss>

It needs context.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>backlash from using magic</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>backlash from using magic (e.g. in a game)</gloss>

I don't see the point of having magic  iquote marks, it's confusing

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1681860">陰陽師</xref>
-<gloss>backlash (after use of 'magic')</gloss>
+<gloss>backlash from using magic</gloss>

meikyo; daijs

ナツメグ	83996
ナツメッグ	4068
ナッツメッグ	81

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ナツメッグ</reb>

merge

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ナッツメッグ</reb>

Entry created

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/日本語の一人称代名詞#おら（俺ら）
meikyo: 現代では方言的

This is still used in certain dialects.
I don't think we need rK tags on an archaic/dialectal entry like this.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -23,2 +20,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1576870">俺</xref>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -26,0 +23 @@
+<s_inf>dialectal in contemporary Japanese</s_inf>

199 sentences indexed to 俺. I think I've locked them to the おれ reading.

fine as kanji with rK?

@@ -5,0 +6,8 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>俺</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>俺ら</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,3 +23 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1576870">俺・おれ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1576870">俺・おれ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1576870">俺・おれ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1576870">俺</xref>
@@ -21 +26,0 @@
-<s_inf>also written 俺 and 俺ら</s_inf>

@@ -5,0 +6,5 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>牛</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +17 @@
+<re_restr>妓夫</re_restr>
@@ -15 +20,0 @@
-<s_inf>ぎゅう is also written with the ateji 牛</s_inf>