カントリーウエア	No matches
カントリーウェア	125

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>カントリー・ウエア</reb>

gg5, prog

I don't think I've heard shorts referred to as "short pants".

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>short pants</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">short pants</lsource>

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ショート・パンツ</reb>

OK. We have heaps of XXXに乗る examples.

I agree.

タクシーに乗る	50248
電車に乗る	249757
バスに乗る	221246 (an entry)
飛行機に乗る	143186

Needed? I suggest deleting this and バスに乗る

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

We've decide to cull the ...に乗る entries.

very.  but so extremely common that people are bound to search for it in both languages

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>

Obvious?

gg5

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>underskirt</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ペティコート
ペチコート	70095
ペティコート	1395

ペティコート seems to be used more for long 19C-style dresses.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ペティコート</reb>

The examples are all for senses 2 and 4.

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

Making the entry more like プラス.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<xref type="ant" seq="1115630">プラス・1</xref>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>negative (quantity)</gloss>
@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -20 +21 @@
-<gloss>deficit</gloss>
+<gloss>negative (number)</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +25,6 @@
+<gloss>deficit</gloss>
+<gloss>loss</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -29,2 +36,21 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
-<gloss>negative (ion, pole, growth, image, effect, etc.)</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>negative charge</gloss>
+<gloss>cathode</gloss>
+<gloss>negative terminal</gloss>
+<gloss>negative pole</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>minus sign</gloss>
+<gloss>negative sign</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>negative (image, effect, thinking, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>bad</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>negative (test result)</gloss>

Yes, this is neater.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

I think you have taken the splitting too far

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>minus (e.g. 20 degrees)</gloss>
+<gloss>minus</gloss>
@@ -14,4 +13,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -20,4 +15,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>minus sign</gloss>

Good point. How about this?

@@ -10,0 +11,6 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>minus (e.g. 20 degrees)</gloss>
+<gloss>negative (quantity)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -12,2 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>minus</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +32 @@
+<gloss>drawback</gloss>
@@ -29 +33,0 @@
-<gloss>defect</gloss>

gg5, daij

Making it clear that the object of the verb can be either the weapon or the thing that is shot.

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>to shoot</gloss>
+<gloss>to shoot (a gun, person, etc.)</gloss>

gg5, prog
daijr (討つ):（「伐つ」とも書く）相手を攻め滅ぼす。「敵を―・つ」「賊を―・つ」

I suggest merging 討つ/撃つ with 1478010 and dropping sense 2 from this entry. 
Daijr/s and meikyo have 射つ. Not irregular.

@@ -11,6 +10,0 @@
-<keb>討つ</keb>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf43</ke_pri>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -18 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>
@@ -30,9 +23,3 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 撃つ</s_inf>
-<gloss>to shoot (at)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5t;</pos>
-<gloss>to attack</gloss>
-<gloss>to defeat</gloss>
-<gloss>to destroy</gloss>
-<gloss>to avenge</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to shoot</gloss>
+<gloss>to fire</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

My bad. I've only ever heard it used to mean "come." A native informer thought あっちへおいで was unnatural but suggested あっちへ行っておいで was ok...

daijs: 行きなさい。来なさい。居なさい。「仕事のじゃまになるからあっちへ―」「こっちへ―」「しばらくそこに―」

"go" and "stay" shouldn't have been dropped.
I don't think the x-refs on sense 1 are needed.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1001180">お出でになる</xref>
@@ -23,0 +23 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2216930">おいでなさい・1</xref>
@@ -27,0 +28,2 @@
+<gloss>go</gloss>
+<gloss>stay</gloss>

I thought that note was useful.

daij, smk, gg5

"underling; henchman" doesn't seem right. smk gives 黒ねずみ as a synonym so I took the glosses from GG5's 黒ねずみ entry.
I don't think "colour" adds anything.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -29 +30 @@
-<gloss>dark grey (colour, color)</gloss>
+<gloss>dark grey</gloss>
@@ -35,2 +36,2 @@
-<gloss>underling</gloss>
-<gloss>henchman</gloss>
+<gloss>deceitful employee</gloss>
+<gloss>unfaithful servant</gloss>

GG5

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_rat
The brown rat (Rattus norvegicus), also known as the common rat, street rat, sewer rat, wharf rat, Hanover rat, Norway rat and Norwegian rat, is a widespread species of common rat.

Even here:
https://www.pestworld.org/pest-guide/rodents/norway-rats/
The Norway rat commonly referred to as the street or sewer rat, is believed to be of Asian origin, arriving in the U.S. on ships from other countries in the 1700s.

The lit translation is "gutter rat", so the "street rat" and "sewer rat" given by Wikipedia seem quite appropriate.  Looking at yourei results, there's a lot of colloquial dialog, and these seem like the most useful glosses. "Norway Rat" looks potentially useful for a pest-control company translating their website (this is what comes up in English...).  Probably not so useful in literature.

@@ -21,0 +22,2 @@
+<gloss>street rat</gloss>
+<gloss>sewer rat</gloss>

I was wrong; it's not really a gerund.

I copy/pasted "adj" from the oxford entry, which had the the example "established and emerging artists".  My own intuition was that "emerging" had a couple of grammatical interpretations, but that I would only actually use "emerging" in an [adj] context in English.  For instance, in my purely [n] example, I wouldn't say "predict the emerging of new markets". (Though you could, and google returns some examples, though rare vs. emergence).

I think "emerging" is a gerund/gerundive.

daijs:
新しい物事が、内部で動き始めること。また、内部の動きが表面化し始めること。独立の気運が胎動する

sankoku:
内部の動きが、表面にすこしあらわれてくる

emerging (adj)
becoming apparent or prominent. <-- almost the literal kokugo definition of 胎動: 表面化し始める

emergence <-- "emerging" is better, but it's an adjective
the process of coming into existence or prominence.
"the emergence of the environmental movement"

A random Japanese-company bilingual powerpoint. Stage 2: moving/developing online games (vs. currently offline offerings).
https://www.capcom.co.jp/ir/data/pdf/fy2004a.pdf
オンラインゲーム市場の胎動 
Moving toward on-line game software market

I don't think what GG5 has is wrong, but I think something has been missed.

No objection to keeping everything in this entry,  but I can say that 胎動する's meaning in context was *very* difficult to interpret(and then have any confidence in) with the current glosses. That's why I put in so much effort.  How do you make "signs of" a verb/adjective.  Or "indications"?  

"stirrings" is straightforward, but it seemed like the wrong word most of the time(in the する case at least, maybe alright as a noun).

For example, what would one do with the daijs example sentence:
独立の気運が胎動する

The daijs example was coincidentally also on wikipedia, on the rise of the Czech independence movement:
チェコ民族独立の気運が胎動する時代にあって、
(google glosses as "national independence was gaining momentum", but I'm also suspicious of google's handling of this term)

Here's one example from a 2021 gov. publication on steps towards carbon neutrality:
https://www.meti.go.jp/shingikai/energy_environment/carbon_neutral_jitsugen/pdf/20210825_2.pdf
3. カーボンニュートラルを目指し胎動する市場の力を活用すること。

I can't see how the previous glosses handle: 胎動する市場の力

And one more strictly-noun usage:
https://www.pentasecurity.co.jp/security_column/未来自動車の変化する５つの要素ー最終回/
新しいサービスによる新規市場の胎動を予測する一方で

In "胎動を予測する", I don't see what could be "predicted" besides "development" or "emergence" of new markets... 

I'm not always sure what the goal of [form] is.  胎動[2] is probably readily understood, but I'm not sure it's a commonly spoken form(If you're familiar with it as such, I'll take your word for it). Where I've found it online, it's in news articles and research papers, not personal blog posts. (By this logic "emergence" in English might be [form], I'm not sure if that's the goal or not).

@@ -30,0 +31,2 @@
+<gloss>emergence</gloss>
+<gloss>(initial) rise (e.g. of a political movement)</gloss>

GG5: 2. 〔新しい動き〕 signs [indications] 《of forthcoming activities》; fomentation.
中辞典: 2. 〈徴候〉 signs; indications

Despite Sankoku, I don't think sense 2 it "formal or literary". It's just regular language.

@@ -28,3 +27,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2858758">胎動する</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2858758">胎動する</xref>
-<misc>&form;</misc>

maybe?

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>considerations</gloss>

prog, ルミナス

GG5 has "hints" but I don't think it's a good fit.
I'm not fond of "do's and don'ts".

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<gloss>things to note</gloss>
+<gloss>matters that require attention</gloss>
+<gloss>important points</gloss>
@@ -12,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>suggestions</gloss>
@@ -14,5 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>things to note</gloss>
-<gloss>suggestions</gloss>
-<gloss>hints</gloss>
-<gloss>important points</gloss>
-<gloss>do's and don'ts</gloss>

Harmless.

I don't really like " matters to be attended to; " for this entry, I don't think it really fits.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>matters to be attended to</gloss>

I guess so.

いらえ is vs, こたえ is.not, acc to meikyo. (also いらえ seems dated, the mk example is Mori Ogai)
I suggest splitting it out

@@ -25,5 +24,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>いらえ</reb>
-<re_restr>答え</re_restr>
-<re_restr>応え</re_restr>

gg5

@@ -35,0 +36,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>answer</gloss>
@@ -36,0 +41 @@
+<gloss>result</gloss>

I think it has to be a separate entry.

gg5, prog, daij

See comments on 1253570.

@@ -3,0 +4,9 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>討つ</keb>
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
+<ke_pri>nf43</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>撃つ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +18,3 @@
+<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
+<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
+<re_pri>nf43</re_pri>
@@ -12 +24 @@
-<gloss>to strike</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -14 +26,4 @@
-<gloss>to punish</gloss>
+<gloss>to destroy</gloss>
+<gloss>to defeat</gloss>
+<gloss>to conquer</gloss>
+<gloss>to avenge</gloss>

Yes, probably.

平常通り 	41952
平常どおり	15920


平常通りの	5679	  
平常通りの営業	1157	  
平常通りの生活	583	  
平常通りの授業	488	  
平常通りの運転	336	  
平常通りの営業と	311	  
平常通りの営業となり	269	  
平常通りの授業を	260	  
平常通りの営業です	256	  
平常通りの生活に	197	  
平常通りの運行	196

all -通り's should perhaps be tagged adj-no

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>平常どおり</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

See 2069030 いつも通.

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>

I'm happy to call it "adv". M&T comment that there's often a に that can be left out.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&adj-pn;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

mk (2 senses)

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>attending someone through the night (guard, nurse)</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>attending someone through the night (of a guard, nurse)</gloss>
@@ -18 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>act of a woman sleeping with a man (at his bidding)</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>sleeping with a man (at his bidding)</gloss>
@@ -23 +25,2 @@
-<gloss>keeping overnight vigil over body before burial</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>overnight vigil before burial</gloss>

流す	1790618
流される	342764

I guess it's "only" the passive voice of 流す, and we could cover it by adding "to overwhelm" to sense 3 here. I do rather like GG5's entry for 流される and since it's quite common it may be best to add it as an entry here.
I'll propose a new entry and close this.

kenkyuusha has an entry for 流される with "overwhelmed" as one of its meanings, one of the example sentences in there: "感情に流される　be overwhelmed by ┏(an) emotion [(a) feeling];"
Should that meaning be added to 流す or 流される should have its own entry for that meaning?

@@ -94,0 +95 @@
+<s_inf>after the -masu stem of a verb</s_inf>

Done.

Thanks. Please do.

GG5, etc.

Agree. It's a term with wide application. I don't think they all need to be stated.

@@ -27 +27 @@
-<gloss>the indentation or groove between the flat cover and the spine of a book</gloss>
+<gloss>indentation</gloss>

https://www.hewit.com/skin_deep/?volume=15&article=2

I think this is simply "groove" in English. Not sure it's worth mentioning its specific use as a bookbinding term.

So how about this?

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>the indentation or groove between the flat cover and the spine of a book</gloss>
@@ -33,4 +33,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>the indentation or groove between the flat cover and the spine of a book</gloss>

Already covered by sense 2.

http://www.ebookcafe-kyoto.com/word/mizo.html

@@ -32,0 +33,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>the indentation or groove between the flat cover and the spine of a book</gloss>

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

i find the 'time series' annotation more confusing than the original

@@ -43,1 +43,1 @@
-<gloss>levelling off (time series, esp. prices)</gloss>
+<gloss>levelling off (of prices, etc.)</gloss>

note on time series sense
(heard in business class today)

@@ -43,1 +43,1 @@
-<gloss>levelling off</gloss>
+<gloss>levelling off (time series, esp. prices)</gloss>

@@ -30,0 +30,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -37,0 +38,1 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

google images

meikyo

@@ -19 +19,9 @@
-<gloss>gold tooling (of a book)</gloss>
+<gloss>foil stamping</gloss>
+<gloss>hot stamping</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>gold tooling (a book)</gloss>

meikyo

@@ -17 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>gold tooling</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>gold tooling (of a book)</gloss>

箔押し機	399
箔押機	188

io I guess?

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>箔押</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>

gg5

I think we should simplify this by dropping the archaic sense. Means we don't need the restr tags.

@@ -10,8 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>じゃけ</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ざけ</reb>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
@@ -19 +10,0 @@
-<stagr>じゃき</stagr>
@@ -21 +12 @@
-<gloss>maliciousness</gloss>
+<gloss>malice</gloss>
@@ -25 +15,0 @@
-<stagr>じゃき</stagr>
@@ -27,9 +17,3 @@
-<gloss>noxious gas</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1502400">物の怪</xref>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>(vengeful) ghost</gloss>
-<gloss>specter</gloss>
-<gloss>spectre</gloss>
+<gloss>bad air</gloss>
+<gloss>noxious vapour</gloss>
+<gloss>miasma</gloss>

oops

@@ -27,1 +27,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1502400">物の怪</xref>
@@ -32,0 +31,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1502400">物の怪</xref>

koj, daij, etc.

might be worthwhile.  maybe not

@@ -10,0 +10,8 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>じゃけ</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ざけ</reb>
+<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +19,1 @@
+<stagr>じゃき</stagr>
@@ -16,0 +25,1 @@
+<stagr>じゃき</stagr>
@@ -17,0 +27,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1502400">物の怪</xref>
@@ -19,0 +30,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>(vengeful) ghost</gloss>
+<gloss>specter</gloss>
+<gloss>spectre</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -16 +15 @@
-<gloss>wandering off course</gloss>
+<gloss>wandering (off course)</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

GG5, ルミナス, etc.

GG5 gives the meaning as "straying", and goes on to say that 迷走*する* means "to stray". That's exactly what the entry currently says - we don't usually spell out the "vs" meaning unless it is not clear.

@@ -13,2 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>to stray</gloss>
-<gloss>to wander off course</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<gloss>straying</gloss>
+<gloss>wandering off course</gloss>

gg5

@@ -13,1 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>straying</gloss>
+<gloss>to stray</gloss>
+<gloss>to wander off course</gloss>

GG5, etc.

prog; daijs

@@ -14 +14,13 @@
-<gloss>wheel coming off its axle</gloss>
+<gloss>wheel coming off</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>going off the shoulder (of a road)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>derailing</gloss>

mk

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>wheel flying off its axle</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>wheel coming off its axle</gloss>

@@ -15,6 +14,0 @@
-<re_restr>どぶ板</re_restr>
-<re_restr>溝板</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ドブいた</reb>
-<re_restr>ドブ板</re_restr>

Not in the references as a sense but it's how KOD uses it. If approved, fix the xref in どぶ板選挙.

@@ -25,0 +26,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<gloss>grassroots (e.g. campaign)</gloss>
+<gloss>door-to-door</gloss>
+<gloss>on the ground</gloss>
+</sense>

OK. Make it "term".

wiki says "terms"
https://guides.lib.unc.edu/chinese_bib/historical_resources this page does too (poss. from wiki)

To be clear, I want to change it from "year" to something else because it's really not just used for years. "Term" seems OK? I'll change the remaining 59 if this is approved.

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>Metal Monkey (57th of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1920, 1980, 2040)</gloss>
+<gloss>Metal Monkey (57th term of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1920, 1980, 2040)</gloss>

I can live with it, but I preferred the "57th year".

Does the new wording on sense 1 look ok to everyone? I'll align the other 59 entries if so.
i.e.
Metal Monkey (57th of the sexagenary cycle, e.g. 1920, 1980, 2040)

I don't think it's archaic, just literary/obscure. Prog uses さあらぬ体 for both of its さあらぬ examples. Quite a few examples in Aozora.

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>
@@ -17 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>behaving as if nothing's happened</gloss>
+<gloss>nonchalant air</gloss>
+<gloss>acting as if nothing had happened</gloss>

さあらぬ体 is in daijs. the example is from heike monogatari.

さあらぬ体で	No matches
然有らぬ体で	No matches
さあらぬ体	53
然有らぬ体	No matches

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>さあらぬ体で</keb>
+<keb>さあらぬ体</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>然有らぬ体で</keb>
+<keb>然有らぬ体</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>さあらぬていで</reb>
+<reb>さあらぬてい</reb>
@@ -15,3 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>with a nonchalant air</gloss>
-<gloss>serenely</gloss>
-<gloss>coolly</gloss>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>unconcerned air</gloss>
+<gloss>behaving as if nothing's happened</gloss>

GG5: さあらぬ体(てい)で nonchalantly; serenely; blithely; as if nothing had happened; with an unconcerned air; quite innocently.
中辞典: さあらぬ体(てい)で nonchalantly; as if nothing had happened; coolly

I'd keep it.

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>serenely</gloss>
+<gloss>coolly</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>trash can</gloss>
@@ -16 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>trash can</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="eng">dust box</lsource>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">dust box</lsource>

I don\t think this can be used for dumpsters

@@ -12,3 +12,6 @@
-<gloss>dust box</gloss>
-<gloss>dumpster</gloss>
-<gloss>skip</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1005010">ゴミ箱</xref>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">dust box</lsource>
+<gloss>garbage can</gloss>
+<gloss>rubbish bin</gloss>
+<gloss>trash can</gloss>
+<gloss>dustbin</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ダスト・ボックス</reb>

gg5

@@ -13,2 +13,3 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>
-<gloss>follow-up (tracing) survey</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>follow-up survey</gloss>
+<gloss>tracing survey</gloss>
@@ -18 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>contact tracing survey (of infectious diseases)</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>contact tracing (of an infectious disease)</gloss>

Looks ok.

https://cgi.city.yokohama.lg.jp/shimin/kouchou/search/data/32006419.html

This is often used in the context of COVID-19.
Is this alright, or should there be another lemma (濃厚)接触者追跡調査 ?

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>contact tracing survey (of infectious diseases)</gloss>
+</sense>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Quiet. Closing.

GG5

I think it's actually two different things. The WWW images for アンダースコート and アンダースカート are quite different

@@ -8,4 +8 @@
-<reb>アンダースカート</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>アンダー・スカート</reb>
+<reb>アンダー・スコート</reb>
@@ -15,3 +12,2 @@
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">under skirt</lsource>
-<gloss>bloomers</gloss>
-<gloss>'safe' pants worn over normal underwear in sports</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2757790">スコート・1</xref>
+<gloss>underwear for a tennis skirt</gloss>

I don't like 'safe'

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アンダー・スカート</reb>
+</r_ele>

Entry created

Oops. Thanks.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>to be lying about (all of the place)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be lying about (all over the place)</gloss>

gg5, daij

Added senses. The JEs only have sense 1.

@@ -10,5 +10,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1005020">ごろごろ・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1005020">ごろごろ・2</xref>
-<gloss>to rumble</gloss>
-<gloss>to thunder</gloss>
-<gloss>to roll about (people, large objects)</gloss>
+<gloss>to hang around</gloss>
+<gloss>to loaf around</gloss>
+<gloss>to loiter</gloss>
@@ -19,4 +17,18 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1005020">ごろごろ・4</xref>
-<gloss>to wander about without a fixed workplace, home, etc.</gloss>
-<gloss>to hang around</gloss>
-<gloss>to loiter</gloss>
+<gloss>to roll (of something large and heavy)</gloss>
+<gloss>to tumble</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be lying about (all of the place)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be strewn (everywhere)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to rumble (of thunder, one's stomach, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to feel uncomfortable due to the presence of a foreign substance (e.g. in one's eye)</gloss>

@@ -10,1 +10,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1005020">ごろごろ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1005020">ごろごろ・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1005020">ごろごろ・2</xref>
@@ -18,0 +19,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1005020">ごろごろ・4</xref>

Just a noun in the kokugos.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

Maybe those 5 are enough.

Do we need all those surface forms? not in thr kokugos.

逢魔が時	23767
逢魔が刻	1839
逢魔時	1339
逢魔ヶ刻	1081
逢魔ヶ時	730
逢う魔が時	631
逢う魔が刻	201
逢う魔ヶ時	No matches
逢う魔ヶ刻	No matches

@@ -19,12 +18,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>逢う魔が時</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>逢う魔が刻</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>逢う魔ヶ時</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>逢う魔ヶ刻</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -37,2 +25 @@
-<gloss>twilight</gloss>
-<gloss>time for disasters (similar to 'the witching hour' but not midnight)</gloss>
+<gloss>twilight (traditionally regarded as a time when accidents and disasters are frequent)</gloss>

逢魔時	1339
逢魔が時	23767
逢魔が刻	1839
逢魔ヶ刻	1081

Check frequencies before putting in a new leading surface form.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>逢魔時</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>逢魔時</keb>

wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>逢魔時</keb>
+</k_ele>

Aligning.

@@ -15,2 +15 @@
-<gloss>twilight</gloss>
-<gloss>time for disasters (similar to 'the witching hour' but not midnight)</gloss>
+<gloss>twilight (traditionally regarded as a time when accidents and disasters are frequent)</gloss>

daijr
大禍時	348
王莽時	No matches

should be aligned w 逢魔が時 (if my edit goes through)

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>王莽時</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,2 +14 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2073680">逢う魔が時</xref>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -14,1 +14,1 @@
-<gloss>the time for disasters (similar to 'the witching hour' but not midnight)</gloss>
+<gloss>time for disasters (similar to 'the witching hour' but not midnight)</gloss>

Entry created

I agree, I'll put them back.

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>throbbingly (of pain)</gloss>
-<gloss>with a pounding</gloss>
-<gloss>in a stinging manner</gloss>
+<gloss>throbbing (pain)</gloss>
+<gloss>pounding</gloss>
+<gloss>stinging</gloss>

These glosses feel quite forced to me. I think present participles are an OK comprise when adverbial glosses would be too awkward.

adv

@@ -12,3 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>throbbing (pain)</gloss>
-<gloss>pounding</gloss>
-<gloss>stinging</gloss>
+<gloss>throbbingly (of pain)</gloss>
+<gloss>with a pounding</gloss>
+<gloss>in a stinging manner</gloss>

daijr/s, gg5

Added to PoS tags.

@@ -7,0 +8 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -11,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>stinging</gloss>

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/symptoms/21605-bloody-show
etc.

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>show (blood-stained mucus discharge that happens during pregnancy up to two weeks before delivery)</gloss>
+<gloss>show (blood-stained mucus discharge that happens towards the end of pregnancy)</gloss>
+<gloss>bloody show</gloss>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1168060">しるし・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1168060">印・1</xref>
@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>mark</gloss>

@@ -14,2 +14 @@
-<gloss>a show</gloss>
-<gloss>blood-stained mucus discharge that happens during pregnancy up to two weeks before delivery</gloss>
+<gloss>show (blood-stained mucus discharge that happens during pregnancy up to two weeks before delivery)</gloss>
@@ -24 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>a sign (with honorific 'o')</gloss>
+<misc>&pol;</misc>
+<gloss>sign</gloss>

Style alignment.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<field>&print;</field>
+<gloss>paper feed (of a printer, photocopier, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>paper feed</gloss>

gg5

I'm assuming this was the intention?
(this is the problem I have with too sparsely-worded brackets, sometimes it gets really hard to understand what's intended)

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>paper feeding (printing)</gloss>
+<field>&print;</field>
+<gloss>paper feeding</gloss>
+<gloss>paper feed</gloss>

Entry created

This has been replaced by [sk] readings and notes in other entries.

Aligning.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>counter for articles</gloss>
+<gloss>counter for (small) things or pieces</gloss>

OK, I'm with Robin. I'll put it back. I'll use "pronounced" (as with は) instead of "read".

@@ -4,6 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>ヶ</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>ケ</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -11 +5 @@
-<reb>か</reb>
+<reb>ヶ</reb>
@@ -14,4 +8 @@
-<reb>が</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>こ</reb>
+<reb>ケ</reb>
@@ -20 +10,0 @@
-<stagr>か</stagr>
@@ -22,0 +13 @@
+<s_inf>pronounced か</s_inf>
@@ -27 +17,0 @@
-<stagr>こ</stagr>
@@ -29,0 +20 @@
+<s_inf>pronounced こ</s_inf>
@@ -33 +23,0 @@
-<stagr>が</stagr>
@@ -35,0 +26 @@
+<s_inf>pronounced が</s_inf>

I'm not comfortable with it. I prefer the old way but with kana in the notes instead of romaji.

It would be a bold move. I'm not sure about putting solo kana in the "Kanji" purely on the grounds that their pronunciation is irregular.
Two other comments:
- if we take this path the entry needs to be split into 3 as it would be breaking the 2/3 rule;
- to be consistent, the は entry should be converted to "は [わ} (prt) ......"
I'm inclined to leave it alone.

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2411850">アラフォー</xref>

daijs

See アラフォー.

@@ -8 +7,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -10,3 +9,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2783990">アラウンドサーティー</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>woman of around thirty</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<s_inf>abbr. of "around thirty"</s_inf>
+<gloss>person around thirty years old (esp. a woman)</gloss>

Daijr, ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -9,1 +9,4 @@
-<gloss>around 30</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2783990">アラウンドサーティー</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>woman of around thirty</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

eij

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>recount (of ballots, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>recount (e.g. of ballots)</gloss>
+<gloss>retallying</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>recount (ballots, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>recount (of ballots, etc.)</gloss>

Entry created

Originated in the UK but was a thing in other countries too

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>mods (trendy young people in early '60s Britain)</gloss>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>
+<gloss>mods (early '60s subculture)</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<s_inf>abbr. of 'around fifty'</s_inf>
+<s_inf>abbr. of "around fifty"</s_inf>

OK (round and round).

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<s_inf>abbr. of アラウンドフィフティー</s_inf>
+<s_inf>abbr. of 'around fifty'</s_inf>

daijs:《around fiftyの略》

Daijs only has the English. I prefer this, as it makes the English origin clear. And "abbr. of アラウンドフィフティー" could imply that アラウンドフィフティー is a term that's actually used.

OK

I think it's better to use Japanese in the notes? like the kokugos

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<s_inf>abbr. of "around fifty"</s_inf>
+<s_inf>abbr. of アラウンドフィフティー</s_inf>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>in brackets</gloss>
+<gloss>parenthesized</gloss>

@@ -11,4 +10,0 @@
-<reb>カッコない</reb>
-<re_restr>カッコ内</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -16 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>括弧内</re_restr>

カッコ内	284500
カッコ内は	208577
カッコ内が	1906
カッコ内の	53488

I see there are about 800 single-sense entries with just "adj-no".

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>

Should this really have exp? I feel it probably shouldn't

koj: 春になって間がなく、まだ春らしい気配が十分に感じられない。
nikk: 春になってまだ日が浅い。十分に春になっていない。

Should be glossed as an adjective.

@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1222820">季語・きご</xref>
+<pos>&adj-shiku;</pos>
@@ -14 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>early, superficial indications of spring</gloss>
+<gloss>early-spring</gloss>
+<gloss>not yet springlike</gloss>
+<gloss>before spring has truly arrived</gloss>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>early, superficial indications of spring (haiku term)</gloss>
+<misc>&poet;</misc>
+<gloss>early, superficial indications of spring</gloss>

OK

I agree. I also feel there should be some way to help people who encounter these XXXちゃう terms for the first time.

やっちゃう	305545
しちゃう	        3353280
行っちゃう	420493
言っちゃう	396253
食べちゃう	292220
見ちゃう	        215675

Use of やっちゃう is definitely not limited to the meaning we have here. I don't think it should be an entry. We don't have any other 〜ちゃう entries.

perhaps should be more broad

@@ -9,1 +9,6 @@
-<gloss>That fellow</gloss>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1012980">遣る・やる・7</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1012980">遣る・やる・11</xref>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<s_inf>from やって and しまう</s_inf>
+<gloss>to have (esp. sex, food, etc.)</gloss>

See below.

Thanks for that. That makes sense. Is it possible for "やっちゃう" to be included with a link to "やる" so that another searcher finds a simple route to that result?

Done.

https://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/やる#動詞
(姦る、犯る, 俗語・婉曲) 強姦する。
犯る	2,355		
姦る	325

Indeed. I suggest adding ヤる as an sk form to 1012980 with an "oft. written as ヤる" note on sense 11. The x-ref to this entry should be dropped.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>姦る</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,4 +11,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ヤる</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
@@ -19,4 +18 @@
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to have sex</gloss>
-<gloss>to fuck</gloss>
-<gloss>to bang</gloss>
+<gloss>to rape</gloss>

Kanji form should be split, it means "to rape"

Aligning.

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&vulg;</misc>
@@ -19 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>to have sex with</gloss>
+<gloss>to have sex</gloss>
+<gloss>to fuck</gloss>
+<gloss>to bang</gloss>

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

GG5

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +18,2 @@
+<gloss>cutting with a cutter</gloss>
+<gloss>shaping with a mold</gloss>

@@ -17,0 +17,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

eij, google images, wiki, 機械工学英和和英辞典, jst, cross
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/カタヌ�
%AD

maybe 2 senses?

ごろんと	41537
ゴロンと	68848

This meaning doesn't correspond to any of the senses of ごろごろ.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ゴロン</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -10 +12,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1005020">ごろごろ・3</xref>
@@ -12,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>flopping (e.g. on a bed)</gloss>
-<gloss>scattering (e.g. limbs horizontally)</gloss>
+<gloss>(lying down) with a flop</gloss>
+<gloss>heavily</gloss>

nikk

@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +13,1 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

GG5

@@ -9,2 +9,4 @@
-<gloss>giving a spring to (e.g. one's legs)</gloss>
-<gloss>someone lying on his side</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1005020">ごろごろ・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1005020">ごろごろ・3</xref>
+<gloss>flopping (e.g. on a bed)</gloss>
+<gloss>scattering (e.g. limbs horizontally)</gloss>

gg5 nikk ニューセンチュリー和英辞典

@@ -10 +10,2 @@
-<gloss>lower garment (e.g. jeans, slacks, skirt, etc.)</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">bottoms</lsource>
+<gloss>lower garment (e.g. jeans, slacks, skirt)</gloss>

I agree with Rene that "if the change to singular is made for トップス, it should 
be made here too". 
.
In addition, I felt it was better to have an example of a lower garment which 
does not have two legs, such as a skirt. Otherwise, one might wonder whether 
something like a skirt is considered to be a ボトムス.
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ボトムス
.
Technically, ボトムス is wasei Eigo, since a "bottom" is "the part of a two-piece 
garment such as a tracksuit or bikini that covers the lower body" (Encarta), 
which is not what ボトムス means in Japanese (it doesn't have to be part of a two-
piece garment).

@@ -10,1 +10,1 @@
-<gloss>lower garments (e.g. jeans, slacks, culottes, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>lower garment (e.g. jeans, slacks, skirt, etc.)</gloss>

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bottoms - "2. (plural only) The bottom (trouser) part of clothing, as in pyjama bottoms, tracksuit bottoms."
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ボトムス

In Japanese "ボトムス" clearly has much wider application than "bottoms" has in English. I think it's probably misleading to gloss it as "bottom" or "bottoms" as their meaning is much narrower.
(I thought it was hilarious the first time I saw "bottoms" advertised in a sale in Japan.)

@@ -10,2 +10,1 @@
-<gloss>bottoms</gloss>
-<gloss>lower garments</gloss>
+<gloss>lower garments (e.g. jeans, slacks, culottes, etc.)</gloss>

OK

アラウンドサーティー	281
アラサー	                9796

I don't think this should be an entry. Virtually all the hits for アラウンドサーティー are just explanations of アラサー.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">around thirty</lsource>

太刀打ち出来る	2929
太刀打ちできる	18918

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>太刀打ち出来る</keb>
+<keb>太刀打ちできる</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>太刀打ちできる</keb>
+<keb>太刀打ち出来る</keb>
@@ -16,4 +16,4 @@
-<s_inf>often in neg.</s_inf>
-<gloss>to be a good match for</gloss>
-<gloss>to stand a chance against</gloss>
-<gloss>to be able to compete with</gloss>
+<s_inf>oft. in the neg.</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be a good match (for)</gloss>
+<gloss>to stand a chance (against)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be able to compete (with)</gloss>

I still think it's useful. Not that clear from the 太刀打ち entry.

Is this really neeeded? 太刀打ち is vs

Examples in GG5 and Eijiro. All 5 Tatoeba sentences containing 太刀打ち actually are for this expression.

太刀打ちできない: 1.3M hits
太刀打ちできる: 330k hits

@@ -16,0 +16,1 @@
+<s_inf>often in neg.</s_inf>
@@ -19,0 +20,1 @@
+<gloss>to hold one's own</gloss>

http://www.ne.jp/asahi/mitoro/page/ac5/words/m16a.htm  
http://www31.atwiki.jp/stalker_cs/pages/21.html

@@ -17,1 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>to be equally skilled</gloss>
+<gloss>to stand a chance against</gloss>
+<gloss>to be able to compete with</gloss>

We don't usually give examples of negative forms.

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2836577">夢にも思わない・ゆめにもおもわない</xref>
-<s_inf>in the negative: ～わなかった, ～っていなかった, etc.</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="2836577">夢にも思わない</xref>
+<s_inf>used in the negative</s_inf>

http://nlp.cis.unimelb.edu.au/jwb/ngrams/ngramlookup.cgi?sent=夢にも思う&wild2=on

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>almost always in negative: ～わなかった, ～っていなかった, etc.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>in the negative: ～わなかった, ～っていなかった, etc.</s_inf>

夢にも思う	1614
夢にも思います	47
夢にも思った	814

Almost always.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>usu. in negative: ～わなかった, ～っていなかった, etc.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>almost always in negative: ～わなかった, ～っていなかった, etc.</s_inf>

Isn't this ALWAYS in the negative, not "usually"? I see the value of this entry for picking 夢に思っていなかった etc. but it's at the same time very weird to have an entry whose base form is ungrammatical (unless follower by まい or ことなかった etc.)

daijr

See アラフォー.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -17,2 +18,3 @@
-<s_inf>from アラウンド還暦</s_inf>
-<gloss>around sixty (years of age)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2411860">アラサー</xref>
+<s_inf>abbr. of アラウンド還暦</s_inf>
+<gloss>person around sixty years old</gloss>

アラフォー アラサー should be aligned if this goes through

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>アラカン</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>アラかん</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -14,2 +15,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>(abbreviation of アラウンド還暦) Around sixty years (of age)</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2411850">アラフォー</xref>
+<s_inf>from アラウンド還暦</s_inf>
+<gloss>around sixty (years of age)</gloss>

May as well close after 6 weeks.

https://yoichit.net/2020/05/24/ア�
%B9%E3%83%91%E3%83%A9%E3%82%AC%E3%82%B9%E3%82%
92%E3%80%90%E7%AB%8B%E8%8C%8E%E6%A0%BD%E5%9F%B
9%E3%80%91%E3%81%97%E3%81%A6%E3%81%BF%E3%81%BE
%E3%81%99%E3%80%82%E3%80%8C%E7%AB%8B%E8%8C%8E/
一般にアスパラガスは、4～5月に次々と芽が出てきて、それら
を収穫後、6月からは収穫をせず、そのまま大きくなるのに任
せておくこと（＝立茎）で、根をしっかりと育てるようにする
必要があるのですが。。。

杓子定規に「5月いっぱいまで収穫しよう」と考えていると、
その年の天候・気温などにより、6月に入ってからほとんど芽
が出てこない、すなわち「立茎」する本数不足で、収穫時期以
外に根・株を育てることに失敗したりします。

http://www.ryokuken.co.jp/2019/07/01/blog-
post_2-17/
アスパラガスの話。立茎栽培とは？
本来ならば、2か月しか収穫できないアスパラガス。
これを半年間も収穫できるようにした画期的な方法が”立茎栽
培”だ。

1か月か2か月ほどしてアスパラガスの株に余力があるうちに、
一部のアスパラガスの収穫をやめて、茎、そして葉に生長させ
る。
この間、1か月。
ある程度の大きさと葉の数が十分になってきたところで、茎の
合間を縫って芽吹いてきた芽を収穫するのだ。

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/hrj/10/3/
10_3_375/_pdf/-char/ja

Hard

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

OK. I'll leave it at this.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>standing stem (esp. asparagus)</gloss>
+<gloss>propping up asparagus stems during cultivation</gloss>

http://www.kiyoofarm.com/90mame/aspala/rikei.h
tm
アスパラは収穫（主に春）が終わると、そのまま、伸ばして、
その名の通り立茎させます。
...
立茎させたアスパラが、倒伏しないように、パイプの支柱を打
って、ネットを張ります。

I think something like "making an asparagus 
stand (during.cultivation)" woule be closer?

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>person who has tested positive</gloss>
+<gloss>person who has tested positive (for a viral infection, etc.)</gloss>

陽性者	14549
陰性者	1627
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/pickup/6409152
また、第６波に備え、希望する軽症者全員をホテルなどの「待機施設」に滞在させるため、都道府県に施設の準備を要請する考えだ。
陽性者を早期に発見するとともに、重症化を防ぐ狙いがある。

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>person who has tested negative</gloss>
+<gloss>person who has tested negative (for a viral infection, etc.)</gloss>

陽性者	14549
陰性者	1627
https://www.shimotsuke.co.jp/articles/-/511184
ワクチン２回接種か陰性者限定、旅行64コース販売へ　うつのみや観光

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>第四Q</keb>
+<keb>第四Ｑ</keb>

Been hanging around for 2 months. Seems OK. Should probably add the others.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>第四Q</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<reb>だいよんきゅう</reb>
+<reb>だいよんキュー</reb>

https://www.nikkeyshimbun.jp/2021/211125-14brasil.html
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/search?p=第４Ｑ&ei=utf-8

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>simplified naturalization (for spouses of Japanese nationals, foreigners born in Japan, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>simplified naturalization (for spouses of Japanese nationals, non-nationals born in Japan, etc.)</gloss>

Can't think of a better way, but "foreigners born in Japan" looks odd.

https://www.office246.com/kika/kani.htm

It applies in many different circumstances.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>simplified naturalization (esp. when married to a Japanese)</gloss>
+<gloss>simplified naturalization (for spouses of Japanese nationals, foreigners born in Japan, etc.)</gloss>

https://www.turning-japanese.info/2010/07/three-types-of-naturalization.html

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>simplified naturalization</gloss>
+<gloss>simplified naturalization (esp. when married to a Japanese)</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/簡易帰化-1294744

https://japanese.stackexchange.com/a/72704
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q11183549091

I don't think a learner has any hope of understanding this with just a literal translation.

@@ -9 +9,3 @@
-<gloss>even with this</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. as 〜というくらい, 〜というほど, etc.; emphasises the amount or degree of something</s_inf>
+<gloss>isn't this enough?</gloss>
+<gloss>are you still not satisfied (with this amount)?</gloss>

Not an adverb.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>

Hmmm. Given It's common and has been stalled for a while, I'll wave it through. Someone can raise it again if needed.

nikk

Might make more sense to keep this and get rid 
of これでもかこれでもか and これでもかというほど?

I'll let it go.

If it's used as an adjective it should be tagged as one. If the first tag is adv, it should be glossed as an adverb, is my stance. I don't think we need all of these glosses but I don't think "in an x manner" is horribly contrived (vs. adding -ly to everything)

Those glosses seem painfully contrived. AFAICT わしゃわしゃと means the following action has a tousling effect. Maybe tousling or ruffling?

adj glosses in adv-tagged entry

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
-<gloss>tousled</gloss>
-<gloss>ruffled</gloss>
-<gloss>disordered</gloss>
-<gloss>flustered</gloss>
-<gloss>confused</gloss>
-<gloss>messy</gloss>
-<gloss>chaotic</gloss>
+<gloss>in a tousled manner</gloss>
+<gloss>in a ruffled fashion</gloss>
+<gloss>in a disorderly manner</gloss>
+<gloss>with a fluster</gloss>
+<gloss>confusedly</gloss>
+<gloss>messily</gloss>
+<gloss>chaotically</gloss>

Wiktionary, https://hinative.com/ja/questions/15549926

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<gloss>tousled</gloss>
+<gloss>ruffled</gloss>
+<gloss>disordered</gloss>