@@ -22 +22 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1839140">岩壁・がんぺき</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1839140">岩壁</xref>

Koj, Daijr/s

Trimming

@@ -23,3 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>steep cliff along the coast</gloss>
-<gloss>cliff wall at shoreline</gloss>
-<gloss>steep seabank</gloss>
+<gloss>wall-like shoreline</gloss>
+<gloss>cliff wall</gloss>

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>steep seabank</gloss>

大辞泉

@@ -23,2 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>steep cliff</gloss>
-<gloss>cliff wall</gloss>
+<gloss>steep cliff along the coast</gloss>
+<gloss>cliff wall at shoreline</gloss>

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1839140">岩壁・がんぺき</xref>

女のケツ	6870
女の尻	5362 (most commonly read しり, see 
https://www.weblio.jp/content/女の尻を追いかける )
女の穴	647
女のけつ	199

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -24,0 +27 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

The word is often used in katana in 
writing and especially on social media 
like Twitter.

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ケツ</reb>

GG5: (馬具の)鐙(あぶみ)を 1 穴短くする shorten the stirrups by a notch.
Daijr: 二穴/にけつ entry: "二つの穴。 「 −バインダー」"

Not sure about a 二穴 entry.

@@ -31,0 +31,6 @@
+<sense>
+<stagk>穴</stagk>
+<pos>&ctr;</pos>
+<gloss>hole</gloss>
+<gloss>notch</gloss>
+</sense>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>lineal descendent</gloss>
+<gloss>lineal descendant</gloss>

Probably

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Koj: 古代、氏を構成し、氏上と同じ姓)を持つ階層の人。平時は氏上に率いられて氏神を奉祀し、氏の所有する部民や賤民を駆使して農業などの生産に従い、戦時には部民や賤民を兵士として率いて戦った。

Yes, odd. Clearly archaic.

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>person of blood lineage</gloss>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>lineal descendent</gloss>

Isn't "person of blood lineage" a weird gloss?

屠場	11743
と場	42099
屠場で	1387
と場で	772

Daijr says "「屠畜場」の旧称".
Shinmeikai says "主として、施設の名に用いられる".

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>と場</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2084210">屠畜場</xref>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

ngrams

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>元気づく</keb>
+</k_ele>

GG5 leads with せきち.

https://kotobank.jp/word/尺地-524889#E3.83.87.E3.82.B8.E3.82.BF.E3.83.AB.E5.A4.A7.E8.BE.9E.E6.B3.89

Kotobank shows both せきち and しゃくち as valid readings.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>せきち</reb>
+</r_ele>

よいしょ	        127,729	54.4%	
ヨイショ	        101,441	43.2%	
よいっしょ	5,100	2.2%	
ヨイッショ	468	0.2%

It should resemble a definition when it's part of the gloss. Opencooper used "phrase" but I think "word" is fine.
よいっしょ/ヨイッショ isn't in the refs. I think we can hide those forms.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -27 +29 @@
-<gloss>yoisho! (yelled out by the crowd during a yokozuna's ritual stomps)</gloss>
+<gloss>yoisho! (word shouted by the spectators during a yokozuna's ritual stomps)</gloss>

I prefer that, and it matches the approach in sense 3.

@@ -27,2 +27 @@
-<s_inf>yelled out by the crowd during a yokozuna's ritual stomps</s_inf>
-<gloss>yoisho!</gloss>
+<gloss>yoisho! (yelled out by the crowd during a yokozuna's ritual stomps)</gloss>

I thought about doing it that way, but the gloss by itself is meaningless, since it's just a romanization. Many apps de-emphasize notes, whereas the part moved out is essential to understanding what the gloss means.

@@ -27 +27,2 @@
-<gloss>yoisho! (phrase yelled out by the crowd during a yokozuna's ritual stomps)</gloss>
+<s_inf>yelled out by the crowd during a yokozuna's ritual stomps</s_inf>
+<gloss>yoisho!</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_marmoset

Rene added that in 2007, at the same time as he added the 絹猿 entry. It looks odd to me, but he's the academic biologist; not me.
I can't see that name being used anywhere, so let's assume it's a typo or something.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_marmoset

Why is "Callithrix" repeated?

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>marmoset (esp. the common marmoset, Callithrix (Callithrix) jacchus)</gloss>
+<gloss>marmoset (esp. the common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus)</gloss>

Entry created

I agree. It might be different it is was common.

G n-grams: 346

A+B. Uncommon.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2146440">好き・ずき</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2146440">好き・ずき・1</xref>

Entry created

Aligning some more.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Budget Committee of the lower house of the Diet (one half of the yosan'iinkai)</gloss>
+<gloss>Budget Committee of the lower house of the Diet</gloss>

Aligning

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2149070">予算委員会</xref>
-<gloss>Budget Committee of the lower house of the Diet (one half of the yosaniinkai)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2149070">予算委員会・1</xref>
+<gloss>Budget Committee of the lower house of the Diet (one half of the yosan'iinkai)</gloss>

Entry created

Yes, I agree.

I don't think referring to the entirety of the Budget Committee as "yosan'iinkai" is doing anybody any favors. I suggest simply 
removing this clarification from all these entries. it's explained in the xreffed entry anyway

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2149070">予算委員会</xref>
-<gloss>Budget Committee of the upper house of the Diet (one half of the yosan'iinkai)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2149070">予算委員会・1</xref>
+<gloss>Budget Committee of the upper house of the Diet</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/予算委員会

Three other instances to align.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Budget Committee of the upper house of the Diet (one half of the yosaniinkai)</gloss>
+<gloss>Budget Committee of the upper house of the Diet (one half of the yosan'iinkai)</gloss>

Entry created

Aligning.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Budget Committee of the upper house of the Diet (one half of the yosan'iinkai)</gloss>
+<gloss>Budget Committee of the upper house of the Diet</gloss>

Aligning

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Budget Committee of the upper house of the Diet (one half of the yosaniinkai)</gloss>
+<gloss>Budget Committee of the upper house of the Diet (one half of the yosan'iinkai)</gloss>

Entry created

Aligning.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Budget Committee of the lower house of the Diet (one half of the yosan'iinkai)</gloss>
+<gloss>Budget Committee of the lower house of the Diet</gloss>

Aligning

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>Budget Committee of the lower house of the Diet (one half of the yosaniinkai)</gloss>
+<gloss>Budget Committee of the lower house of the Diet (one half of the yosan'iinkai)</gloss>

Entry created

Yeah, I feel it's adequately covered by "used to laugh something off", probably.

I think sense 2 handles it well enough. You'd have to have an essay on all the things that could lead someone to saying it That Chiebukuro paragraph is good, but let's not try and turn it into a gloss.

https://kotobank.jp/word/ぬるぽ-188435

There's an "exhausted" sense that this entry hasn't captured yet. Not sure if it's the same as sense 2.

OK. I'm afraid "bloop" doesn't work for me either. If it means anything, it's a mistake, like "blooper". I feel it's best left as an explanation, but I can live with "nurupo".

If we could come up with more than one English gloss, I feel "bloop" would be fine. But alone, I agree it's a little weird, it would seem 
like we're saying it's a better translation than it really is.
How's just "nurupo"? We can come back and remove the gloss once Jmdict 2.0 is functional

@@ -22,0 +23,2 @@
+<stagr>ぬるぽ</stagr>
+<stagr>ヌルポ</stagr>
@@ -27 +29 @@
-<gloss>bloop</gloss>
+<gloss>nurupo</gloss>

Eijiro, JST, Igaku, Reverso

It's フッ素+系+界面活性剤. 界面活性剤 is "surfactant". That Wiki-derived gloss looks off.

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances</gloss>
-<gloss>PFASs</gloss>
+<gloss>fluorochemical surfactant</gloss>
+<gloss>fluorine-based surfactant</gloss>

wiki

Standard use of 返す as aux-v.

きかえす	59
頷き返す	2121
うなずきかえす	46
Unidic

Looks plausible but we need a reference or two for the meaning. Which "original entry"?

This word appears in 魔女の宅急便, page 243, line 10.

The original entry is a misinterpretation, I guess

gg5, daijr
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threading_(manufacturing)#Thread_forming_and_rolling

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<reb>ヘッドフォン・ステレ</reb>
+<reb>ヘッドフォン・ステレオ</reb>

ヘッドフォンステレオ	3086
ヘッドホンステレオ	10042

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヘッドホンステレオ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<reb>ヘッドホンステレオ</reb>
+<reb>ヘッドホン・ステレオ</reb>
@@ -11,4 +14 @@
-<reb>ヘッドフォン・ステレオ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ヘッドホン・ステレオ</reb>
+<reb>ヘッドフォン・ステレ</reb>

https://panasonic.jp/audio/p-db/image.html?hb=RQ-SX50-S&type=image

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>ヘッドホンステレオ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヘッドホン・ステレオ</reb>

I came across it in a text discussing something in a 1980 context and the meaning intended was "walkman".
The link you posted is just a search result from Rakuten, not a category of items, and none of the headphones appearing on that 
first page seem to have "ヘッドフォンステレオ" in their titles.

https://search.rakuten.co.jp/search/mall/ヘッドフォンステレオ/

I'm wondering if the dictionaries are a little out of date here, and the term is more commonly used now for "stereo headphone(s)".

Maybe "bikini armor" should be a gloss rather than just in the lsrc as 1) a "skimpy armor" isn't necessarily bikini-based while ビキ
ニアーマー is and 2) while Japanese anime/manga stuff dominates the search results, there's some non-Japanese stuff too in google 
books. (a quote from a Manhattan-based publisher, Irene Gallo, in a 2015 issue of Uncanny Magazine, the phrase appearing in a Cory 
Doctorow book from 2016, among other things)

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="eng">bikini armor</lsource>
-<gloss>skimpy armor (e.g. in anime, video games)</gloss>
+<gloss>bikini armor (e.g. in anime, video games)</gloss>
+<gloss>skimpy armor</gloss>

Plenty of examples that are not chainmail.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>chainmail bikini</gloss>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>chainmail bikini</gloss>

ビキニアーマー	688
but 15 or so tweets past 6 hrs
there's some hits on twitter in English too, 
not sure if "bikini armor" should maybe be a 
gloss.

ベリーショート	29176
ベリショ	1397

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/ベリショ

Indeed. In JMdict.

 kyuu to kyū conversion
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Nishihankyuu</gloss>
+<gloss>Nishihankyū</gloss>

8-)}
But it *is* a place!

 kyuu to kyū conversion
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Kitahankyuu</gloss>
+<gloss>Kitahankyū</gloss>