daij, gg5, prog, chuijten

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -12,0 +12,13 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1132940">メカニカル</xref>
+<gloss>mechanical</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>mechanism</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>technique (e.g. in piano-playing)</gloss>
+</sense>

Daijr has ロバー. No ref has ロバ for anything other than the "donkey" meaning. Looks like the [gai1] tag is a mistake.

@@ -5,2 +5 @@
-<reb>ロバ</reb>
-<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
+<reb>ロバー</reb>

Seems to be fairly broad.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>academic credentials</gloss>

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>academic record</gloss>

If it was terribly common it might be useful, but I agree it's obvious.

記憶力がいい	7110
記憶力がない	5083
記憶力が悪い	9622

I think I agree. (esp. as the English gloss isn't even useful for reverse look-ups)

This does feel very A+B. I don't think it's needed. We have an entry for 記憶力.

記憶力がいい	7110
きおくりょくがいい	< 20
記憶力が良い	3546
記憶力がよい	734
きおくりょくがよい	< 20

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>記憶力がいい</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +14,5 @@
+<reb>きおくりょくがいい</reb>
+<re_restr>記憶力がいい</re_restr>
+<re_restr>記憶力が良い</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +20,2 @@
+<re_restr>記憶力が良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>記憶力がよい</re_restr>

Why? Whoever you are, you need to make a case for it. It's in Eijiro, for examples.

Koj: 「素敵」は当て字。「素的」「素適」とも書く。テキは接尾語

Yes, the kokugos only have 素敵 as ateji. I'd leave it on 素適 too.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/素敵

素的 doesn't seem to be ateji.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>

素敵	24808992
素適	83281
素的	19573
すてき	3141293
ステキ	5096906

@@ -24,0 +25,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ステキ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>
+</r_ele>

gg5
G n-grams:
素敵	24808992
すてき	 3141293
素適	   83281
素的	   19573

improving the glosses ("dreamy" seems a bit off)
reordering

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<keb>素的</keb>
+<keb>素適</keb>
@@ -16 +16 @@
-<keb>素適</keb>
+<keb>素的</keb>
@@ -28,2 +28,2 @@
-<gloss>dreamy</gloss>
-<gloss>beautiful</gloss>
+<gloss>wonderful</gloss>
+<gloss>nice</gloss>
@@ -34 +33,0 @@
-<gloss>capital</gloss>

Eh?

@@ -10,3 +10 @@
-<reb>でんしけいさんき</reb>
-<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf33</re_pri>
+<reb>でんけいさんき</reb>

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>

Daijr/s redirects to コンピューター.

Is the [comp] tag necessary? This isn't jargon.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1053350">コンピュータ</xref>

余計	4318281
余計な	1936222
余計に	1516823
余計が	190
余計を	228

Let's drop that note; it's behaving like any other 形容動詞.
Definitely not a noun. Re Robin's "Despite what the kokugos say, I don't think any of these senses are nouns", I quite agree. Many 形容動詞 get [名] tags in the kokugos despite them demonstrably only being used as adjectives in modern Japanese. I think this is due to them conforming to "classical" grammatical concepts. We tend to tag them as "adj-na,n", I would be quite happy to cull the "n" where appropriate. I'll raise an issue on this.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<s_inf>oft. adverbially as 余計に</s_inf>

daij, meikyo, prog, gg5
余計	4318281
余計を	228
余計が	190

We're not very consistent when it comes to notes like this. But on 20 entries we have a note that says "oft. adverbially as ..." (or something similar). I prefer this to just "as ..." However, I'm not sure the note is even needed.
Looking at the kokugo definitions and JE examples, I think these are the only glosses needed on sense 3.
Despite what the kokugos say, I don't think any of these senses are nouns. Meikyo just has 形動/副.

@@ -18,2 +18,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<s_inf>often as 余計に</s_inf>
+<s_inf>oft. adverbially as 余計に</s_inf>
+<gloss>extra</gloss>
+<gloss>more</gloss>
+<gloss>too much</gloss>
@@ -21 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>too much</gloss>
@@ -24,2 +24,0 @@
-<gloss>superabundant</gloss>
-<gloss>extra</gloss>
@@ -31,2 +29,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -36 +33,2 @@
-<gloss>otiose</gloss>
+<gloss>unwanted</gloss>
+<gloss>uninvited</gloss>
@@ -40,3 +37,0 @@
-<gloss>abundantly</gloss>
-<gloss>excessively</gloss>
-<gloss>needlessly</gloss>
@@ -43,0 +39 @@
+<gloss>even more</gloss>

I don't agree. Do any other editors have a view?
A parallel is the 事前 entry, where we have "(often as 事前に)".

I think that's precisely why it's needed, a learner could misconstrue 余計に to be adjectival

Given that the POS is "adj-na" I think that is not needed.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<s_inf>often adv. as 余計に</s_inf>
+<s_inf>often as 余計に</s_inf>

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

等角	8569	  
等角写像	2510	  
等角投影	1189	  
等角図	1047	  
等角度	810	  
等角フォント	598
等角の	120

Mostly used pronominally in maths contexts.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +14,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<field>&math;</field>
+<gloss>conformal</gloss>
+<gloss>isometric</gloss>
+<gloss>equiangular</gloss>
+</sense>

This is simpler and more general.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&math;</field>
@@ -16,4 +17 @@
-<field>&art;</field>
-<gloss>plain doll body (in dollmaking)</gloss>
-<gloss>body base model (in 3dcg)</gloss>
-<gloss>simplified body drawing (in illustration)</gloss>
+<gloss>figurine (used in modeling, dollmaking, etc.)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/素体

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/素体

This sense is highly overloaded with usages in several different artistic disciplines, so I'm not sure how to phrase it efficiently. I'll leave summing it up to someone more familiar with this dictionary's norms.

@@ -13,0 +14,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&art;</field>
+<gloss>plain doll body (in dollmaking)</gloss>
+<gloss>body base model (in 3dcg)</gloss>
+<gloss>simplified body drawing (in illustration)</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, wisdom

@@ -26,2 +26,3 @@
-<gloss>very helpful</gloss>
-<gloss>caring</gloss>
+<gloss>very caring</gloss>
+<gloss>kind</gloss>
+<gloss>helpful</gloss>

面倒見がいい	20298
めんどうみがいい	288
面倒見が良い	15280
面倒見がよい	4216
めんどうみがよい	123

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>面倒見がいい</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +14,5 @@
+<reb>めんどうみがいい</reb>
+<re_restr>面倒見がいい</re_restr>
+<re_restr>面倒見が良い</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +20,2 @@
+<re_restr>面倒見が良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>面倒見がよい</re_restr>
@@ -15 +25 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>

Splitting off 2822520.

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>面倒見がいい</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -14,5 +10,0 @@
-<reb>めんどうみがいい</reb>
-<re_restr>面倒見がいい</re_restr>
-<re_restr>面倒見が良い</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -20,2 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>面倒見が良い</re_restr>
-<re_restr>面倒見がよい</re_restr>
@@ -26 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2238140">面倒見のいい</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2822520">面倒見がいい・めんどうみがいい</xref>

整数論	15269
数論	25127

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>theory of numbers</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2834056">数論・1</xref>
+<field>&math;</field>

Yes. We usually treat them as titles. I think one gloss is enough.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>minister of the environment</gloss>
-<gloss>environment minister</gloss>
+<gloss>Minister of the Environment</gloss>

officially "of the" in Japanese. Should it be capitalized?

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Minister for the Environment</gloss>
+<gloss>minister of the environment</gloss>
+<gloss>environment minister</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>

Entry created

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>algebraical</gloss>
+<gloss>algebraic</gloss>

Entry created

頭いい	128568
あたまいい	6937
頭良い	40517
頭よい	977
あたまよい	51

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.

@@ -6,0 +7,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>頭良い</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>頭よい</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +15,7 @@
+<re_restr>頭いい</re_restr>
+<re_restr>頭良い</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>あたまよい</reb>
+<re_restr>頭良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>頭よい</re_restr>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>

Entry created

都合がいい	111052
つごうがいい	613
都合が良い	64372
都合がよい	28036
つごうがよい	441

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.

@@ -6,0 +7,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>都合が良い</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>都合がよい</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +15,7 @@
+<re_restr>都合がいい</re_restr>
+<re_restr>都合が良い</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>つごうがよい</reb>
+<re_restr>都合が良い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>都合がよい</re_restr>

proposed split

@@ -7,6 +6,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>都合が良い</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>都合がよい</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -15,7 +8,0 @@
-<re_restr>都合がいい</re_restr>
-<re_restr>都合が良い</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>つごうがよい</reb>
-<re_restr>都合が良い</re_restr>
-<re_restr>都合がよい</re_restr>
@@ -24,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>

Entry created

https://www.oed.com/discover/words-from-the-land-of-the-rising-sun

"Isekai" was recently added to the OED as a genre.

OK

What opencooper was saying is that "isekai" in English doesn't refer to the actual "other world" as much as it refers to the genre of 
works that take place in them. I don't think adding "(genre)" is helpful because I don't think it's clear that it should be read as 
"this English gloss mainly applies to the genre dealing with works taking place in another world" but will instead be interpreted as 
"異世界 refers to a genre". I'm sure opencooper is correct but I'm assuming "isekai" can have both meanings in English i.e. 1) genre 
dealing w 異世界, 2) 異世界, and since it's at the bottom of the list, I think this entry is probably fine as-is.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>isekai (genre)</gloss>
+<gloss>isekai</gloss>

異世界	321649	  
異世界ファンタジー	15540	  
異世界物	740
異世界もの	2097

Maybe this makes it clearer. Could be a separate sense.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>isekai</gloss>
+<gloss>isekai (genre)</gloss>

* https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/isekai#English

* https://www.weblio.jp/content/異世界モノ
* https://dic.pixiv.net/a/異世界もの

I just want to note that, in English, "isekai" is primarily used to refer to a *genre* of such works 
(evidenced by the references provided). Still useful to have, I guess, unless we have an 異世界もの entry 
or someplace better for it.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2822120">ても良い・てもいい・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2822120">てもいい・1</xref>
@@ -24 +24 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2822120">ても良い・てもいい・2</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2822120">てもいい・2</xref>

てもいい	11211746
ていい	13884078
ても良い	3004632
てもよい	1408478
て良い	3483693
てよい	1645465

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.
Needs splitting

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>て良い</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -5 +8 @@
-<reb>てもいい</reb>
+<reb>ていい</reb>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<reb>ていい</reb>
+<reb>てよい</reb>
@@ -12,0 +16,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2822120">ても良い・てもいい・1</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -18,0 +24,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2822120">ても良い・てもいい・2</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>(after the ren'youkei form of a verb) indicates concession or compromise</gloss>
+<s_inf>after the ren'youkei form of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>indicates concession or compromise</gloss>

PoS fix.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>

i guess we'll leave it in for now then?

koj: 言語学および文献学の旧称。

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1723480">文献学</xref>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>linguistics</gloss>

Entry created

ごほごほ	14240
ゴホゴホ	41617
こほこほ	725
コホコホ	3065
Koj (こほ‐こほ) - 「ごほごほ」に同じ。

Merging proposed 2850347.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ゴホゴホ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8 +11,4 @@
-<reb>ゴホゴホ</reb>
+<reb>コホコホ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>こほこほ</reb>
@@ -15,0 +22,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<gloss>thundering</gloss>
+<gloss>drumming</gloss>

koj, daij, gg5

@@ -11,1 +11,1 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -13,2 +13,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/je2/82368/m0u/  
http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/leaf/jn2/81682/m0u/  
http://thejadednetwork.com/sfx/browse/goho_goho/

Thanks

https://www.uekipedia.jp/落葉広葉樹③/フユザクラ/

Appears to be a typo in the katakana form (フユザカラ > フユザクラ)

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>フユザカラ</reb>
+<reb>フユザクラ</reb>

Daijr, GG5

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2129290">狼男・おおかみおとこ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2129290">狼男</xref>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/狼男 - "人狼（じんろう）ともいう"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mafia_(party_game) - "Mafia, also known as Werewolf, is a social deduction game, created by Dimitry Davidoff in 1986."

Moving this back from the names dictionary.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2129290">狼男・おおかみおとこ</xref>
@@ -12,0 +14,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>Werewolf (social deduction game)</gloss>
+<gloss>Mafia</gloss>

Move that to the names dictionary.

@@ -13,4 +12,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>Werewolf (social deduction game)</gloss>

Wikipedia, etc.

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>Werewolf (social deduction game)</gloss>

Lots of hits; thanks to games.

てもいい	11211746
ていい	13884078
ても良い	3004632
てもよい	1408478
て良い	3483693
てよい	1645465

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.
The いい version has てもいい and ていい combined, but they should be split. I'll make this the てもいい version.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>てもいい</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -12 +15 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -19 +23 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>(after the ren'yōkei form of a verb) indicates concession or compromise</gloss>
+<s_inf>after the ren'yōkei form of a verb</s_inf>
+<gloss>indicates concession or compromise</gloss>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>(after the ren'youkei form of a verb) indicates concession or compromise</gloss>
+<gloss>(after the ren'yōkei form of a verb) indicates concession or compromise</gloss>

N-grams

Kanji form more common. Split from 2458040.

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2822530">面倒見のいい・めんどうみのいい</xref>

Oops.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-ix;</pos>

Split from 1912130.

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.

just has the が removed. surely exp

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

G n-grams:
頭いい	128568
あたまいい	6937
頭よい	977
頭良い	40517

Equivalent of 頭いい.

gg5
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/サーンキヤ学派

I think we can drop "higher arithmetic".

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&math;</field>
@@ -13 +14,5 @@
-<gloss>higher arithmetic</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2850349">サーンキヤ学派</xref>
+<gloss>Samkhya (school of Indian philosophy)</gloss>

Refering to "number theory" as "arithmetic" (or even "higher arithmetic") is really old-fashioned. According to wikipedia those terms fell out use at the beginning of 20th century.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>arithmetic</gloss>
+<gloss>higher arithmetic</gloss>

enwiki, britannica ("arithmetics")

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>arithmetic</gloss>

adj-ix/i fixup  - resumed.

proposed split from 2264750

Aligning.

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<gloss>minister of the environment</gloss>
-<gloss>environment minister</gloss>
+<gloss>Minister of the Environment</gloss>

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=environment minister,minister of the environment,minister for the environment
https://www.env.go.jp/en/aboutus/profile/minister.html
officially "- of the -" in Japan

Do we usually capitalize these?

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>Minister for the Environment</gloss>
+<gloss>minister of the environment</gloss>
+<gloss>environment minister</gloss>

digital daijisen https://kotobank.jp/word/環境相-469514
https://www.nikkeyshimbun.jp/2019/191026-22brasil.html

gg5

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>stationary</gloss>
+<gloss>stationary point</gloss>

GG5

daijr, daijs, nikk: https://kotobank.jp/word/留-149485

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivermectin

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&pharm;</field>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙, etc.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/イベルメクチン

Recent tweets:
"お金ないのに脳直で課金するのやめたい…"
"脳直で買ってしまった"
"YAMAHAが好きすぎて脳直でインターンエントリーした"
"好きすぎて脳直でRTしてしもうた"
"脳直で生きてるからこういうことになるんですよ…"

I checked Twitter for examples. Pretty common (dozens of tweets in the past 24 hours - none of which are 脳直ダダ漏れ). I don't think "brain fart" works.

@@ -13,3 +13,3 @@
-<s_inf>often as 脳直ダダ漏れ</s_inf>
-<gloss>saying something as soon as the thought occurs</gloss>
-<gloss>brain fart</gloss>
+<gloss>acting on impulse</gloss>
+<gloss>doing impulsively</gloss>
+<gloss>doing instinctively</gloss>

脳直	1530	  
脳直ダダ漏れ	577	  
脳直で	501

Or "col".

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<s_inf>usu. as 脳直で</s_inf>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<s_inf>often as 脳直ダダ漏れ</s_inf>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>brain fart</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<s_inf>usu. as 脳直で</s_inf>

https://w.atwiki.jp/tsuvoc/pages/650.html
https://note.com/crouka/n/nb60573c8dd0c
https://www.reddit.com/r/newsokunomoral/comments/pczapn/中国はコロナ起源重要情報隠蔽_バイデン氏/hammsx2/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

脳直	1530
Not in the refs. Probably slang.

Looks OK. Although, as you say, 麺 would probably be read めん.
チュンジャン appears to be something else.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2195460">ジャージャー麺・ジャージャーめん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2195460">ジャージャー麺</xref>

ジャジャンミョン	1270
チャジャンミョン	9192
ジャジャン麺	4967
チャジャン麺	4119
チュンジャン	987

See recent edits/discussion on 2195460.
Maybe this is the best way to handle it. Japanese people would probably read 麺 as めん, but in this context ミョン is probably OK.
What to do with チュンジャン? Another entry? Ignore?

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>チャジャン麺</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ジャジャン麺</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_restr>チャジャン麺</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ジャジャンミョン</reb>
+<re_restr>ジャジャン麺</re_restr>
@@ -10,0 +22 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

チャジャンミョン	9192
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/チャジャンミョン
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jajangmyeon

See discussion at 2195460.

GG5, 中辞典

The Wikipedia title looks OK to me.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>conductor</gloss>
+<gloss>conductor (class field theory)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/導手 - 代数的整数論で、局所体や大域体の有限次アーベル拡大の導手(conductor)は、拡大の分岐を定量的に測るものである。導手の定義はアルティン写像に関連がある。 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conductor_(class_field_theory) - In algebraic number theory, the conductor of a finite abelian extension of local or global fields provides a quantitative measure of the ramification in the extension. The definition of the conductor is related to the Artin map. 
https://hiramatu-hifuka.com/onyak/kotoba-1/sugaku.html -  reading

Improvements on the gloss?

Sum of the parts, but it seems the "standard" term.

* daijs: https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/自動車ナンバー自動読取装置/#jn-296243
* jawiki: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/自動車ナンバー自動読取装置

自動車ナンバー自動読取	422

* daijs: https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/Nシステム/
* https://www.sakuragaoka.gr.jp/nsysUS/index.html

I'd go with "col". A play on マネーロンダリング, of course.

https://president.jp/articles/-/34913?page=1
ネット用語でいう「学歴ロンダリング」だ。

or sl. maybe even joc.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>attending a high-ranked graduate school to boost one's credentials</gloss>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>attending a highly-ranked graduate school to boost one's credentials</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">academic background laundering</gloss>

学歴ロンダリング	2031  <- name of a book, so probably inflated.
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/fc9fc7e5f0de7d36cd69589cced87e95611e8433 - 「学歴ロンダリング」は国際標準に。学歴ガラパゴス日本でも社会人院生がブームに

学歴ガラパゴス indeed. Not that sure it's worth an entry.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>educational background laundering</gloss>
-<gloss>to go on to a higher graduate school instead of the graduate school of the university you are enrolled in</gloss>
+<gloss>attending a high-ranked graduate school to boost one's credentials</gloss>

https://gekokujo.co.jp/blog/g036/

学歴ロンダリングとは、大学から大学院に進学するときに、自分が在籍する大学の大学院ではなくさらに上位の大学院へと進学すること

ＫＯＤ追加語彙
グレインフェッド	360

貿易紛争	1805
貿易戦争	2276
eij

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2770730">無塩バター</xref>

有塩バター	7950
無塩バター	51179 (already an entry)

ごほごほ	14240
ゴホゴホ	41617
こほこほ	725
コホコホ	3065
Koj (こほ‐こほ) - 「ごほごほ」に同じ。

Good to look at other references and n-gram counts.
Merging with ゴホゴホ entry.

https://kotobank.jp/word/こほこほ-504222

Fine

How does this look?

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>the four top LDP positions</gloss>
+<gloss>the four top party executives (of the LDP)</gloss>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>four roles of the party</gloss>
-<gloss>The secretary-general of the LDP, the chairman of general affairs, the chairman of political affairs, and the chairman of the election campaign committee</gloss>
+<gloss>the four top LDP positions</gloss>

https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASN9H33LHN9GUTFK03Q.html
https://www.jiji.com/jc/article?k=2020091500826&g=tha

自民党の幹事長、総務会長、政調会長、選挙対策委員長は「党四役」と呼ばれる
自民党を取り仕切る幹部4人で、幹事長、総務会長、政調会長、選対委員長を指す

daij, koj
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/サーンキヤ学派
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samkhya

看板に偽りなし	9436
看板に偽り無し	1838

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>看板に偽り無し</keb>

Tanaka sentence:
あの男鳴り物入りで入社したけど、実力のほど看板に偽りなしだったね。 
He came on board this company with a lot of fanfare and he turns out to have the skill and talent to live up to it.

daij imidas chujiten

看板に偽りなし	9436

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>ship that has run around</gloss>
+<gloss>ship that has run aground</gloss>

https://www.bbc.com/japanese/56546633
G n-grams: 4001

Might be worth having.

Looks pretty slangy to me.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>

プロい	2918
プロくない	42
http://zokugo-dict.com/28hu/proi.htm

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>5743323</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>

https://twitter.com/search?q="プロい"&src=typed_query&f=live

Saw someone using it on Instagram.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taro_Kono
https://twitter.com/konotaromp
(he himself prefers "Kono Taro")

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Kouno Tarō (1963.1.10-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Taro Kono (1963.1.10-; Japanese politician)</gloss>

太郎 Tarou to Tarō conversion
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Kouno Tarou (1963.1.10-)</gloss>
+<gloss>Kouno Tarō (1963.1.10-)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mafia_(party_game) - "Mafia, also known as Werewolf, is a social deduction game, created by Dimitry Davidoff in 1986."

OK, I'll drop this and add another sense to the JMdict 人狼 entry. We can argue over the Mafia/Werewolf issue there.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/人狼ゲーム

I feel that Mafia and Werewolf are two different, if almost identical games. I don't think that anybody playing the game with werewolf-based 
roles refers to that game as "Mafia", nor that anybody playing it with mafia-based roles refers to that game as "Werewolf." Also in my (highly 
anecdotal) experience, Werewolf is the more popular version - though I was first introduced to it as "Mafia" some 20 years ago, I've only come 
across it as "Werewolf" after that.

I agree it's not a single product but more akin to charades. There's a lot of boxed versions of the game with a sea of different names (人狼 
SUPER DX from Gentosha, ワンナイト人狼 by a smaller company, コンプレックス人狼 by 株式会社人間, 究極の人狼デラックス by Bezier Games) but all you 
really need to play the basic version is pen and paper.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/汝は人狼なりや?

I don't think it's the sort of thing that belongs in the names dictionary. It's an activity (like charades). It's not played with any equipment.
According to jwiki, it's based on "汝は人狼なりや?" (The Werewolves of Millers Hollow), which *is* a product.

人狼 is a JMdict entry (2792560). The question really is whether products, games, etc. which are named after things in the main dictionary go here or become a sense there, or both. Do we need to establish a policy?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mafia_(party_game)

I think this is should stay in jmdict. It's a game but not a product. More commonly known as "Mafia" in English.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Werewolf (social deduction game)</gloss>
+<gloss>Mafia (party game)</gloss>
+<gloss>Werewolf</gloss>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>2850352</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -11,2 +10,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>kinsey reports</gloss>
+<misc>&work;</misc>
+<gloss>Kinsey Reports</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/キンゼイ報告