GG5, etc.

@@ -19,2 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>to gear (engage) with</gloss>
-<gloss>to be in gear (mesh)</gloss>
+<gloss>to engage (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be in gear (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>to mesh</gloss>
@@ -30,2 +31,2 @@
-<gloss>(usu. neg.) to be on the same plane (of conversation)</gloss>
-<gloss>to have a fruitful, smooth discussion</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. neg.</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be on the same wavelength</gloss>

大辞泉
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=かみ合わない

話がかみ合わない ≒ 1. one or other party is uninterested in conversation despite efforts, or 2. not talking about the same thing

@@ -26,0 +27,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>(usu. neg.) to be on the same plane (of conversation)</gloss>
+<gloss>to have a fruitful, smooth discussion</gloss>
+</sense>

Daijr/s.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーー─┬────────────┬───────╮
│ 言葉 │ 49,193,603 │ 97.2% │
│ 詞　 │  1,071,272 │  2.1% │
│ 辞　 │    354,111 │  0.7% │
╰─ーー─┴────────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5 (sense 3), prog (sense 4)

I think this is worth having as a separate sense.

@@ -35 +34,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1417330">単語</xref>
@@ -37 +35,0 @@
-<gloss>words</gloss>
@@ -38,0 +37 @@
+<gloss>expression</gloss>
@@ -40,2 +38,0 @@
-<gloss>expression</gloss>
-<gloss>remark</gloss>
@@ -46,0 +44,8 @@
+<gloss>(use of) language</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>words</gloss>
+<gloss>remark</gloss>
+<gloss>statement</gloss>
+<gloss>comment</gloss>

GG5: a plan; an idea; a fancy; a 「sudden [spur-of-the-moment] idea; an impulse; an inspiration.
中辞典; (1) a plan; an idea; a suggestion (2) a spur-of-the-moment idea
ルミナス: idea; thought
4 Tanaka sentences have "idea" and 1 "suggestion".

I think the original wasn't too bad.

@@ -19,2 +19,5 @@
-<gloss>(offhand) idea</gloss>
-<gloss>(sudden) thought</gloss>
+<gloss>idea</gloss>
+<gloss>plan</gloss>
+<gloss>fancy</gloss>
+<gloss>impulse</gloss>
+<gloss>thought</gloss>

Daijisen

@@ -19,2 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>plan</gloss>
-<gloss>idea</gloss>
+<gloss>(offhand) idea</gloss>
+<gloss>(sudden) thought</gloss>
+<gloss>whim</gloss>

@@ -6,0 +6,1 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -14,0 +15,1 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Google hits: 15,000k vs. 1,900k (.9 orders of magnitude).

* Add alt spelling 思いつき – much more common than full kanji. (From article I’m reading.)

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>思いつき</keb>
+</k_ele>

mk

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +26 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog, daij

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>promotion (e.g. of a government policy)</gloss>
+<gloss>promotion (of a policy, project, movement, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -27 +27,2 @@
-<gloss>implementation</gloss>
+<gloss>advancement</gloss>
+<gloss>pushing forward</gloss>

gg5, prog, eij, etc.

'driving force' = 推進力

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>driving force</gloss>
+<gloss>drive</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +25,2 @@
+<gloss>promotion (e.g. of a government policy)</gloss>
+<gloss>furtherance</gloss>
@@ -26 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>promotion (e.g. of a government policy)</gloss>

I don't have a record of it.

daij, koj

I don't know where "(usually) single-character word" came from.

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>(usually) single-character word</gloss>

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<field>&ling;</field>

I don't think this is adj-no.
Not sure this should really be tagged ling

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5; meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>warranty</gloss>

OK

I agree with Marcus. 保険 isn't adjectival unless "保険のX" can mean "insured X" (which it can't, as far as I know).
See the discussion on the 金融 entry for my thoughts about adj-no.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

I don't think 保険の is adjectival in
保険の財源
保険の衝突
保険の補償
I think it's bog-standard noun use. Not finding anything else that looks like an adjective here:
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=保険の (search word: 保険の)

I don't think we should be using adj-no this haphazardly. Sometimes the line is a little unclear whether noun+の is really adjectival or 
not, but in those cases I think we can consider what use the information we're providing is to the user. What I mean by this is that telling 
a user that a noun for "strength" is an adj-no is useful - you don't have to jump logical hoops to arrive at the conclusion that the 
Japanese word can also be used like the adjective "strong". The same cannot be said for an entry like "insurance": if the only possible 
English adjective equivalent is "relating to insurances; of an insurance" then we're just adding a tag to explain noun+の+noun usage that 
already applies to all nouns. It's not useful or helpful.

👍

Thanks for the explanation. I don't have any objections to using
the field tags to mean specific terminology or jargon rather than
categorization, but until now I had no idea that was the
intent. (I finally understand why タンク isn't [mil]).

We typically only use field tags for terminology (i.e. technical or special terms). So 積分 gets a math tag but 数学者 does not. It has been suggested in the past that we expand the use of field tags to include all field-related terms but I'm not sure there's much enthusiasm for that idea. I'm quite happy with the current policy, which mirrors that of the JEs and English dictionaries.
Deciding what counts as "terminology" isn't an exact science, but simple A+B terms like 麻雀クラブ or 麻雀打ち wouldn't usually be tagged.

I thought the purpose of field tags was at least partially to
serve as metadata. For example, you can search "#mahj" on
jisho.org to bring up a list of all mahjong vocabulary.

If we're going to remove tags because they look redundant, should
we also remove the tag from 麻雀牌 ("mahjong tile"), 雀荘 ("mahjong
parlour; mahjong parlor"), 雀卓 ("mahjong table"), etc?

We're actually kind of inconsistent about this right now. In
addition to 麻雀, similar entries like 麻雀打ち and 麻雀クラブ
also don't have the tag.

Absolutely. The field tags should be dropped from 花札 and 相撲.

@@ -28 +27,0 @@
-<field>&mahj;</field>

I don't really trust Saito that much.

@@ -19,5 +18,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
-<gloss>sequel (of a story)</gloss>

saito: 2. (=話の続き)the sequel (of a story)

Unless I missed it, "sequel" is not in the JEs or kokugos (even nikk/koj). It's solely in saito. Maybe 
should be dropped?

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

余談話	978
余談の	12173

< 1%

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

余談	1395563

余談の話	215
余談な話	207
probably not an adjective at all?

gg5, prog, www images

@@ -12 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>practice ground</gloss>
+<gloss>practice field</gloss>
+<gloss>training ground</gloss>
+<gloss>driving range</gloss>
+<gloss>practice hall</gloss>
+<gloss>rehearsal space</gloss>

rm 'practise' wherever it is being used as a noun

@@ -13,1 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>practise ground</gloss>

G n-grams:

背筋	888154
背すじ	23058
せすじ	11418

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>背すじ</keb>

I agree. I'll do that.

@@ -14,7 +13,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>はいきん</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>back muscles</gloss>
-</sense>

daij, gg5

The "back muscles" sense is always はいきん. The other two senses are always せすじ. I think we need a separate はいきん entry.

@@ -19,2 +19 @@
-<gloss>the muscles along the spine</gloss>
-<gloss>dorsal muscles</gloss>
+<gloss>back muscles</gloss>
@@ -24 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>spinal column</gloss>
+<gloss>spine</gloss>
+<gloss>line of the backbone</gloss>
@@ -28,2 +28 @@
-<gloss>seam in the back</gloss>
-<gloss>back seam</gloss>
+<gloss>seam down the back (of clothing)</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<field>&physiol;</field>
@@ -15,4 +15,6 @@
-<gloss>blood making</gloss>
-<gloss>hemopoiesis (haemopoiesis)</gloss>
-<gloss>hematosis (haematosis)</gloss>
-<gloss>hematopoiesis (haematopoiesis)</gloss>
+<gloss>hematopoiesis</gloss>
+<gloss>haematopoiesis</gloss>
+<gloss>hemopoiesis</gloss>
+<gloss>haemopoiesis</gloss>
+<gloss>hematosis</gloss>
+<gloss>haematosis</gloss>

[vt]: sankoku
[vi]: shinmeikai
The sentences in GG5 and prog sound intransitive to me. The priority tanaka corpus sentence sounds transitive.

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 邪魔立て　 │ 3,692 │ 74.1% │
│ 邪魔だて　 │ 1,159 │ 23.3% │
│ じゃま立て │    34 │  0.7% │ - sK
│ じゃまだて │    97 │  1.9% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 　邪魔立てする │ 2,179 │ 92.9% │
│ を邪魔立てする │   166 │  7.1% │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

No clear answer from the refs regarding the transitivity. Guess we can cop out and use both tags.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +20,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

N-gram

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>邪魔だて</keb>

GG5, Daijr

It gets ~1k hits cf 50k for 邪魔立て.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>じゃま立て</keb>
@@ -13,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>a hindrance</gloss>
+<gloss>deliberate hindrance</gloss>
+<gloss>obstruction</gloss>

daij, gg5, prog
油つぼ	2283

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>油つぼ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -15,2 +18,9 @@
-<gloss>oilcan</gloss>
-<gloss>oil container</gloss>
+<gloss>oil bottle (esp. for hair oil)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>oilcup</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>font (in an oil lamp)</gloss>

油壷	6852
油壺	25865
GG5, Daijr, Koj

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>油壺</keb>
+</k_ele>

G n-grams:


楽楽	84822
楽々	2260321
らくらく	2574164
ラクラク	2344238

楽楽と	312
楽々と	37784
らくらくと	6671
ラクラクと	3844

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>楽楽</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +9,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>楽楽</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ラクラク</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>stir frying</gloss>
+<gloss>stir-frying</gloss>
+<gloss>stir-fry</gloss>

gg5, daij

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>vegetables cooked in oil</gloss>
-<gloss>fried vegetables</gloss>
+<gloss>stir frying</gloss>
+<gloss>stir-fried food</gloss>

油炒め	25237
油いため	9320
Warodai

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>油いため</keb>

Entry created

GG5: for the love of God; for 「God's [Heaven's] sake 《help me and do》
中辞典: for God's [goodness', mercy's] sake

The originals weren't too bad. The good JEs are often more up-to-date.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>for goodness' sake</gloss>
+<gloss>for the love of God</gloss>

@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>for mercy's sake</gloss>
-<gloss>for the love of God</gloss>
-<gloss>for goodness' sake</gloss>
+<gloss>I implore you, ...</gloss>
+<gloss>I beg of you, ...</gloss>

大辞泉

Are those good translations? They all seem phrases of exasperation to me.
後生だから is not used for exasperation, but is an emphatic way to say "please"

Entry created

G n-grams:

羽目を外す	4809
ハメを外す	3273
羽目をはずす	2829
はめを外す	574
はめをはずす	1010
ハメをはずす	3398

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>はめを外す</keb>
+<keb>羽目をはずす</keb>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<keb>羽目をはずす</keb>
+<keb>はめを外す</keb>
@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<re_restr>羽目をはずす</re_restr>
@@ -20 +20,0 @@
-<re_restr>羽目をはずす</re_restr>

Yes, when used intransitively it works. Very colloquial, but so is "to go over the top".

Is "cut loose" really correct? I'm thinking of "cutting someone lose"

I agree.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<field>&med;</field>

Is it really a medical term? GG5 tags it as【薬】. Not sure it needs a tag.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

gg5, reverso

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1733130">治療法</xref>
-<gloss>therapeutic medication</gloss>
+<gloss>therapeutic agent</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>medicine</gloss>
+<gloss>drug</gloss>
@@ -16 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>(a) medicine</gloss>

GG5, etc.

Emphasizing the difference with 治療法.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1733130">治療法</xref>
+<gloss>therapeutic medication</gloss>
@@ -14 +16 @@
-<gloss>therapeutic medication</gloss>
+<gloss>(a) medicine</gloss>

"hemopoietic stem cell" gets very few online hits.

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>hematopoietic stem cell (haematopoietic)</gloss>
-<gloss>hemopoietic stem cell (haemopoietic)</gloss>
+<field>&biol;</field>
+<gloss>hematopoietic stem cell</gloss>
+<gloss>haematopoietic stem cell</gloss>

Entry created

I agree. It might be different it is was common.

G n-grams: 346

A+B. Uncommon.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2146440">好き・ずき</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2146440">好き・ずき・1</xref>

Entry created

OK, I'll use that pattern for the others. It's quite general.

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -12,2 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2154120">パスモ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2154120">パスモ</xref>
@@ -15 +13 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">rechargeable prepaid IC card for travel and purchases</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">rechargeable prepaid IC card used for travel and purchases</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suica

I'm suggesting this as a slightly simpler explanation. It would be good to get an agreed pattern for all these cards.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">rechargeable prepaid IC card used as a train pass also as electric money</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">rechargeable prepaid IC card for travel and purchases</gloss>

Usually written with romaji (can't remember ever seeing it written out in katakana)

All of these (I'm mostly sure) can be used throughout the country now. The expl can probably still be refined

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>Ｓｕｉｃａ</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>Suica (rechargeable prepaid IC card that can be used as a train pass in the greater Tokyo, Osaka and Sendai regions and also as electric money in some stores)</gloss>
+<gloss>Suica</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">rechargeable prepaid IC card used as a train pass also as electric money</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

Entry created

I'm comfortable with both, but best to be consistent with the region names.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/関西

For 中国地方 I merged the expl gloss into the main gloss. Which style is better?

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>Kansai region</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">region consisting of Osaka, Kobe, Kyoto and surrounding prefectures</gloss>
+<gloss>Kansai region (center-west area of Japan comprising Osaka, Kobe, Kyoto and surrounding prefectures)</gloss>

aligning w 関西

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>Kansai region (south-western half of Japan, including Osaka)</gloss>
+<gloss>Kansai region</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">region consisting of Osaka, Kobe, Kyoto and surrounding prefectures</gloss>

Entry created

阿部槇	21 <- in Warodai (Japanese-Russian) and JLD

槇 and 槙 are ragarded as variants.

@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>阿部槇</keb>
+<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>

Koj, Daijr, GJD, GG5, 植物名辞典, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quercus_variabilis. N-grams:
阿部槙	No matches
棈	1392
あべまき	1730
アベマキ	7256

Koj & GG5 have 棈, Daijr and 植物名辞典 have 阿部槙, and GJD has no kanji. 棈 is JIS 212/213.

gg5

@@ -18 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>hard-to-predict</gloss>
+<gloss>hard to predict</gloss>
+<gloss>up in the air</gloss>
+<gloss>unclear</gloss>

G n-grams:

海の物とも山の	1180
海のものとも山の	7355 <- chuujiten

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>海のものとも山のものともつかない</keb>
+</k_ele>

Fork

I don't think this is needed. 深く can be used with so many different words. Also, the meaning is obvious.

GG5 examples, Eijiro, Reverso
地中深く	25861

Obviously from 地中 + 深い, but probably common enough to have.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>deeply buried</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=地中深く
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/地中深く

OK. It's not as though it's been here for years.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

I don't think this is needed. 深く can be used with so many different words. Also, the meaning is obvious.

GG5 examples, Eijiro, Reverso
地中深く	25861

Obviously from 地中 + 深い, but probably common enough to have.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>deeply buried</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=地中深く
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/地中深く

I don't mind dropping it. Many dialect words are rather colloquial.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<misc>&col;</misc>

We used to do this at least for words 
appearing in more than one dialect... but 
maybe we don't any longer?

I thought we didn't tag dialectal terms as col.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<s_inf>Yamanishi dial.</s_inf>
+<s_inf>Yamanashi dial.</s_inf>

Quiet. Closing.

キャンペーンキャラクター	6938
ＫＯＤ追加語彙: brand ambassador - 《CM や PR に起用される》イメージ[キャンペーン]キャラクター, 広報[宣伝]大使.

Quiet. Closing.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/広報大使
ＫＯＤ追加語彙: brand ambassador - 《CM や PR に起用される》イメージ[キャンペーン]キャラクター, 広報[宣伝]大使.
広報大使	24527

The Wiki article says it can mascot too. Hmmm.

OK, let's go with that.

The provided refs give two (or three) meanings.

@@ -12,3 +12,11 @@
-<gloss>after all that</gloss>
-<gloss>if you think about it</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="lit">going the full circle</gloss>
+<gloss>when you really think about it</gloss>
+<gloss>on reflection</gloss>
+<gloss>in actual fact</gloss>
+<gloss>when all is said and done</gloss>
+<gloss>all things considered</gloss>
+<gloss>in the end</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>once again (fashionable, popular, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>back (in style)</gloss>

Reverso

Possibly useful, but it's one of those filler terms that are hard to translate. Further suggestions are welcome.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>If think about it carefully</gloss>
+<gloss>after all that</gloss>
+<gloss>if you think about it</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">going the full circle</gloss>

一周回って	6791
一周回ったら	161
一周回れば	80
一周回る	1551

https://kotowaka.com/young/issyuumawatte/
https://meaning-book.com/blog/20190614132057.html

「一周回って」は、「よくよく考えてみると」という意味になります

I think that works? At least if it's near the end

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>peak bagging</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_bagging

I think that's good.  Maybe "peak bagging" is a step too far....

Should we have a gloss for the second half of daijs's definition?

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>completing a series of climbs (e.g. the Seven Summits)</gloss>

How's this?

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>completing a route (up a mountain)</gloss>

OK

I think this is more accurate.

@@ -14,2 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>agreeing</gloss>
-<gloss>consenting</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>being convinced</gloss>
+<gloss>understanding</gloss>

腹落ち	1326
腹に落ちる	1840 <- Koj points to this.

An abbreviation of sorts.

@@ -12,2 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>to be convinced</gloss>
-<gloss>to be satisfied</gloss>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2850487">腹に落ちる</xref>
+<gloss>agreeing</gloss>
+<gloss>consenting</gloss>
+<gloss>being satisfied</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/腹落ち

納得すること、成程と思うこと、腹に落ちる

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>all the way thorough</gloss>
+<gloss>all the way through</gloss>

最初から最後まで	424232
ＫＯＤ追加語彙, Eijiro, etc.
3 Tanaka sentences

At first I thought "no, it's too obvious", but seeing it's so very common it's probably worth having. I'll index the sentences.

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>end-to-end</gloss>
+<gloss>all the way thorough</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=最初から最後まで
https://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/最初から最後まで

Probably not "needed" but some indication of a hypernym/hyopnym relationship might help. OTOH maybe it's the role of the dictionary client software to detect/display that rather than having it part of the metastructure.

I don't think these sorts of x-refs are needed for scientific/technical terms.

@@ -12,2 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1662800">造血・ぞうけつ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1662800">造血・ぞうけつ</xref>

KOD

I'm making it "biol" since I think it applies to all animals.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1662800">造血・ぞうけつ</xref>
+<field>&biol;</field>

https://kotobank.jp/word/造血細胞-89260

daijr, koj

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>night watch</gloss>
+<gloss>night watch (while striking clappers)</gloss>

GG5, Wadoku

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>lace curtain</gloss>
+<gloss>lace curtains</gloss>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙
レースカーテン	76876

Will stop mismatches too.

GG5, etc.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/変形性関節症

腹に落ち	        3716	  
腹に落ちる	1840	    
腹に落ちない	471

It appears to be synonymous with 腑に落ちる (but it's usually positive).

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<gloss>to agree</gloss>
-<gloss>to consent</gloss>
+<gloss>to understand</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>to be convinced</gloss>

腹落ち	1326
腹に落ちる	1840
Koj, Daijr/s

Koj points 腹落ち to this.

脱衣麻雀	8795
脱衣トランプ	20
脱衣ポーカー	274
脱衣花札	146
ストリップポーカー	187

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&mahj;</field>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/脱衣麻雀
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/脱衣麻雀#Japanese

www images
https://j-kassa.jp/know/
https://shibuya-scramble.tokyo/13712/
https://www.amazon.co.jp/メイクアップ-化粧品-メイク道具-小顔-美顔グッズ-かっさプレート/b?ie=UTF8&node=2356867051
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gua_sha
刮痧	250
かっさ	5896
カッサ	4045