バニティーケース	1453
バニティケース	1951

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<reb>バニティケース</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バニティ・ケース</reb>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バニティー・ケース</reb>

バニティーバッグ	1032
バニティバッグ	2001

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<reb>バニティバッグ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バニティ・バッグ</reb>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バニティー・バッグ</reb>

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

OK. I was wavering on that anyway.

is the [lit] gloss necessary/helpful?  my dics all say something along the lines of it being used especially within christianity, esp. to refer to another (non-monotheistic) faith.

so paganism/heathenism seems to capture it perfectly without the lit gloss.  (e.g. Buddhism is the dominant faith in Japan, but dics tell us it is more likely to be among minority Christians to refer to the majority faith)

@@ -15,1 +15,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">another faith, esp. not dominant one</gloss>

GG5, Daijr, etc.

At first I thought Nils was explaining "heathenism", but really this is the "real" meaning of 異教.

@@ -14,1 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>heathenism (being of another faith, esp. not dominant one)</gloss>
+<gloss>heathenism</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">another faith, esp. not dominant one</gloss>

新英和大辞典 has "ヒンズー教, インド教" for Hinduism.

I think "obsc" is OK here.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

インド教	517
ヒンドゥー教	67435
can well call it obsc? because it is, relatively?

daij

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>インド教</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<reb>いんどきょう</reb>
+<reb>インドきょう</reb>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1967230">ヒンドゥー教</xref>

I don't think we put adj-no on languages any longer.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Don't think is more of an adjective than any other regular noun.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

GG5

@@ -19,0 +19,3 @@
+<gloss>care</gloss>
+<gloss>caregiving</gloss>
+<gloss>caring</gloss>

GG5, etc.

@@ -19,2 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>to gear (engage) with</gloss>
-<gloss>to be in gear (mesh)</gloss>
+<gloss>to engage (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be in gear (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>to mesh</gloss>
@@ -30,2 +31,2 @@
-<gloss>(usu. neg.) to be on the same plane (of conversation)</gloss>
-<gloss>to have a fruitful, smooth discussion</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. neg.</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be on the same wavelength</gloss>

大辞泉
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=かみ合わない

話がかみ合わない ≒ 1. one or other party is uninterested in conversation despite efforts, or 2. not talking about the same thing

@@ -26,0 +27,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>(usu. neg.) to be on the same plane (of conversation)</gloss>
+<gloss>to have a fruitful, smooth discussion</gloss>
+</sense>

[vs]:    daijr/s
[vs,vi]: shinmeikai, oukoku, meikyo, iwakoku

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| 係争　　 | 90,880 | 99.9% |
| 繋争　　 |     60 |  0.1% | <- daijr/s, koj, meikyo, etc.
| けいそう | 30,810 |  N/A  |

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -18,0 +20,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

I'm not seeing any adj-no examples in the ngrams.
I don't think adj-f is applicable either.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>dispute</gloss>
@@ -20 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>dispute</gloss>

Does it mean "contentious; controversial" in those examples? If they don't, I don't think it's adjectival.

新英和大辞典 contentious
【法律】 係争の, 争訟の.
OTOH
係争事件	1555
係争の事件	< 20

Maybe adj-f?

GG5, etc.

@@ -16 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>state religion; official religion; established religion</gloss>
+<gloss>state religion</gloss>
+<gloss>official religion</gloss>
+<gloss>established religion</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_religion

Adding other terms identified in the Wikipedia page used as a source for this entry

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>state religion</gloss>
+<gloss>state religion; official religion; established religion</gloss>

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

GG5: a plan; an idea; a fancy; a 「sudden [spur-of-the-moment] idea; an impulse; an inspiration.
中辞典; (1) a plan; an idea; a suggestion (2) a spur-of-the-moment idea
ルミナス: idea; thought
4 Tanaka sentences have "idea" and 1 "suggestion".

I think the original wasn't too bad.

@@ -19,2 +19,5 @@
-<gloss>(offhand) idea</gloss>
-<gloss>(sudden) thought</gloss>
+<gloss>idea</gloss>
+<gloss>plan</gloss>
+<gloss>fancy</gloss>
+<gloss>impulse</gloss>
+<gloss>thought</gloss>

Daijisen

@@ -19,2 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>plan</gloss>
-<gloss>idea</gloss>
+<gloss>(offhand) idea</gloss>
+<gloss>(sudden) thought</gloss>
+<gloss>whim</gloss>

@@ -6,0 +6,1 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -14,0 +15,1 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Google hits: 15,000k vs. 1,900k (.9 orders of magnitude).

* Add alt spelling 思いつき – much more common than full kanji. (From article I’m reading.)

@@ -4,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>思いつき</keb>
+</k_ele>

shinmeikai

I don't think "unvirtuous" is right.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>unvirtuous girl</gloss>
+<gloss>unmarried woman who has lost her virginity</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
27,047	 83.5%	傷物
   363	  1.1%	疵物
 3,531	 10.9%	傷もの
 1,450	  4.5%	きずもの

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>疵物</keb>
+<keb>傷もの</keb>
@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<keb>傷もの</keb>
+<keb>疵物</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -24 +22,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

aggression;

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

NOt the kind of thing we'd tag adj-no if it were submitted today.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

I guess so.

* wisdom: 侵入する … 【コンピューターへ】hack
* genius: コンピューターへの侵入は重大犯罪である Hacking into a computer is a serious crime.

パソコンに侵入	5485

Both refs also have "hacker" for 「侵入者」.

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<gloss>hacking</gloss>

神道信者	774

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>followers of Shintoism</gloss>
+<gloss>Shintoist</gloss>
+<gloss>follower of Shintoism</gloss>

mk

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -24,0 +26 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog, daij

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<gloss>promotion (e.g. of a government policy)</gloss>
+<gloss>promotion (of a policy, project, movement, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -27 +27,2 @@
-<gloss>implementation</gloss>
+<gloss>advancement</gloss>
+<gloss>pushing forward</gloss>

gg5, prog, eij, etc.

'driving force' = 推進力

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>driving force</gloss>
+<gloss>drive</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +25,2 @@
+<gloss>promotion (e.g. of a government policy)</gloss>
+<gloss>furtherance</gloss>
@@ -26 +27,0 @@
-<gloss>promotion (e.g. of a government policy)</gloss>

I don't have a record of it.

daij, koj

I don't know where "(usually) single-character word" came from.

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>(usually) single-character word</gloss>

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<field>&ling;</field>

I don't think this is adj-no.
Not sure this should really be tagged ling

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>Japanese-made</gloss>

gg5
G n-grams 1082848

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -11,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5; meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>warranty</gloss>

OK

I agree with Marcus. 保険 isn't adjectival unless "保険のX" can mean "insured X" (which it can't, as far as I know).
See the discussion on the 金融 entry for my thoughts about adj-no.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

I don't think 保険の is adjectival in
保険の財源
保険の衝突
保険の補償
I think it's bog-standard noun use. Not finding anything else that looks like an adjective here:
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=保険の (search word: 保険の)

I don't think we should be using adj-no this haphazardly. Sometimes the line is a little unclear whether noun+の is really adjectival or 
not, but in those cases I think we can consider what use the information we're providing is to the user. What I mean by this is that telling 
a user that a noun for "strength" is an adj-no is useful - you don't have to jump logical hoops to arrive at the conclusion that the 
Japanese word can also be used like the adjective "strong". The same cannot be said for an entry like "insurance": if the only possible 
English adjective equivalent is "relating to insurances; of an insurance" then we're just adding a tag to explain noun+の+noun usage that 
already applies to all nouns. It's not useful or helpful.

I don't really trust Saito that much.

@@ -19,5 +18,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
-<gloss>sequel (of a story)</gloss>

saito: 2. (=話の続き)the sequel (of a story)

Unless I missed it, "sequel" is not in the JEs or kokugos (even nikk/koj). It's solely in saito. Maybe 
should be dropped?

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

余談話	978
余談の	12173

< 1%

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

余談	1395563

余談の話	215
余談な話	207
probably not an adjective at all?

gg5, prog, www images

@@ -12 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>practice ground</gloss>
+<gloss>practice field</gloss>
+<gloss>training ground</gloss>
+<gloss>driving range</gloss>
+<gloss>practice hall</gloss>
+<gloss>rehearsal space</gloss>

rm 'practise' wherever it is being used as a noun

@@ -13,1 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>practise ground</gloss>

No. It should have had 主 removed when あるじ was split off.

@@ -9,4 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>主</keb>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>

is 主 ever pronounced しゅじん？

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -32 +30,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -37 +34,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -43 +39,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1590850">乾季</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1590850">乾季</xref>

G n-grams:
 雨季	272888
 雨期	 64705

reordering

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>雨季</keb>
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,4 +12,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>雨季</keb>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>

@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1590850">乾季</xref>

Not really an antonym.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1588010">雨期</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1588010">雨期</xref>

I don't think this is an adjective. "of the dry season"

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

G n-grams:
 乾季	151326
 乾期	 26469

reordering

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>乾季</keb>
+<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
@@ -9,4 +12,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>乾季</keb>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>

GG5

This might help.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>treatment</gloss>
+<gloss>method of treatment</gloss>

Suggestion: I think it could be clearer how this and 治療薬 are different things

G n-grams 1590552

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>company or industrial secret</gloss>
+<gloss>company secret</gloss>
+<gloss>industrial secret</gloss>

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5
無宗教を	1276
無宗教が	1011

Also used as a regular noun.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -12,2 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>secular</gloss>
-<gloss>without (official) religion</gloss>
+<gloss>irreligion</gloss>
+<gloss>lack of religion</gloss>
+<gloss>unbelief</gloss>

Doesn't look like an adj-no to me.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Entry created

GG5: for the love of God; for 「God's [Heaven's] sake 《help me and do》
中辞典: for God's [goodness', mercy's] sake

The originals weren't too bad. The good JEs are often more up-to-date.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>for goodness' sake</gloss>
+<gloss>for the love of God</gloss>

@@ -12,3 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>for mercy's sake</gloss>
-<gloss>for the love of God</gloss>
-<gloss>for goodness' sake</gloss>
+<gloss>I implore you, ...</gloss>
+<gloss>I beg of you, ...</gloss>

大辞泉

Are those good translations? They all seem phrases of exasperation to me.
後生だから is not used for exasperation, but is an emphatic way to say "please"

Entry created

I agree.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<field>&med;</field>

Is it really a medical term? GG5 tags it as【薬】. Not sure it needs a tag.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

gg5, reverso

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1733130">治療法</xref>
-<gloss>therapeutic medication</gloss>
+<gloss>therapeutic agent</gloss>
@@ -14,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>medicine</gloss>
+<gloss>drug</gloss>
@@ -16 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>(a) medicine</gloss>

GG5, etc.

Emphasizing the difference with 治療法.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1733130">治療法</xref>
+<gloss>therapeutic medication</gloss>
@@ -14 +16 @@
-<gloss>therapeutic medication</gloss>
+<gloss>(a) medicine</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Kinki region (incl. Osaka, Kyoto, Hyogo, Nara, Wakayama, Mie and Shiga prefectures)</gloss>
+<gloss>Kinki region (Osaka, Kyoto, Hyogo, Nara, Wakayama, Mie and Shiga prefectures)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Kinki region (inc. Osaka, Kyoto, Hyogo, Nara, Wakayama, Mie and Shiga prefectures)</gloss>
+<gloss>Kinki region (incl. Osaka, Kyoto, Hyogo, Nara, Wakayama, Mie and Shiga prefectures)</gloss>

Entry created

Aligning.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&astron;</field>

PLuto, Mars aren't tagged [astron]

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<field>&astron;</field>

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2222120">準惑星</xref>

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<field>&astron;</field>

minor deity

@@ -12,4 +11,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>Eris (Greek goddess of strife)</gloss>
-</sense>

Better be consistent.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Ōsaka dialect</gloss>
+<gloss>Osaka dialect</gloss>

This is one of 3 entries that spell "Osaka" as "Ōsaka" out of 81 entries containing the word.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Osaka dialect</gloss>
+<gloss>Ōsaka dialect</gloss>

Entry created

See comments on 2405070.

Entry created

I agree. Let's delete this and イタリア製 but keep 日本製.

日本製   	1082848 (entry)
中国製　　	513765
イタリア製	307239 (entry)
ドイツ製　	192120
アメリカ製	147641
フランス製	129454 (this entry)
韓国製　　	85695
台湾製　　	64590
スペイン製	62911

I don't think [country name + suffix that can be applied to any country name] make for useful entries. I think イタリア製 should go 
too. 
日本製 could maybe stay.

GG5: フランス製の French-made.
フランス製	129454
フランス製は	550
フランス製が	549
フランス製な	1094
フランス製の	40778

??

@@ -11 +10,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

Entry created

I think entries like this wouldn't get in now, but I don't see a real need to purge them. It's not as if they are cluttering the pages.

いい気持ち	141875
良い気持ち	34203
いい気持	        5820

I think we can delete this.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>良い気持ち</keb>
@@ -13,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

Kind of A+B.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

Entry created

May as well have them all.

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヴァニティー</reb>

ヴァニティー	349
ヴァニティ	1432

usu. only when transliterated from the English, e.g. the Japanese title of "Vanity Fair"

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヴァニティ</reb>

バニティー	2141
バニティ	        8937

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バニティ</reb>

Entry created

I think it would. Chujten just has "convert". リーダーズ+プラス has it as the translation of "apostate".

daijs etc.

Was gonna add
\; esp. of former Communists and socialists who have renounced their beliefs under pressure
but maybe it'd be too much?

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>convert</gloss>
+<gloss>convert (e.g. to a cause)</gloss>

http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/convert
http://kotobank.jp/jeword/転向

住所不明	10659	  
住所不明の	1872	  
住所不明で	1512	  
住所不明者	1020	
 住所不明が	82

It's certainly not a noun. I'd call it an expression.

@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

is this an adjective?

return to sender...

Eijiro, 新和英中辞典, ルミナス和英辞典

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1268140">五畿内・ごきない</xref>

Bulk update adding hist to old provinces
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Settsu (former province located in the northern and central parts of present-day Ōsaka and the southeast of Hyōgo prefectures)</gloss>
+<gloss>Settsu (former province located in the northern and central parts of present-day Osaka and the southeast of Hyogo prefectures)</gloss>

Uncapitalizing plural "prefectures".

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Settsu (former province located in the northern and central parts of present-day Ōsaka and the southeast of Hyōgo Prefectures)</gloss>
+<gloss>Settsu (former province located in the northern and central parts of present-day Ōsaka and the southeast of Hyōgo prefectures)</gloss>

Let's let this go for now. 
We need to think/talk seriously about the situation with "adj-no".

It's a tricky one. I assume that many (if not most) 〜主義 terms *can* be used adjectivally with の, but I'd probably include them among the groups of nouns that we don't *need* to tag as adj-no (alongside countries, languages, colours, etc.)
I wouldn't object to dropping adj-no from all 〜主義 entries.

エリート主義	6353
エリート主義の	754

Top 100 N-grams Lookup for エリート主義の (Frequency Order)
エリート主義の	754	  
エリート主義の終焉	80	  
エリート主義の閉鎖	31	  
エリート主義の閉鎖さ	31	  
エリート主義の閉鎖され	31	 
(possibly this line: 今週の抜粋で、彼はエリート主義の閉鎖された「飲酒クラブ」への彼の入会について話します ) 
エリート主義の終焉宮沢	29	  
エリート主義の弊害	28	  
エリート主義の教育	27	  

tweets:
茶谷氏はシンガポールの教授ってコトですけどエリート主義のシンガポールも大したコト無いなかと。 (Sep 5)
いかに財務省という似非エリート主義の少人数グループに日本国民が多大な迷惑を被ってきたか。 (May 2)

Hm. I guess I'm not really sure about the 主義's. Looking at the top ngram lookups for エリート主義の, I think only エリート主
義の教育 could really be viewed as adjectival. Looking at twitter, I see some stuff that would be best translated as 
"elitist". I guess it might be useful to have this and other -主義 entries (but not necessarily all) adj-no tagged. I'm also 
interested to hear what other editors (Robin) think(s).

リーダーズ+プラス: elitist
-- a エリート主義の.
中辞典: エリート主義の教育制度 an elitist education system.

Looks pretty adjectival to me.
I can do a bulk removal, but let's be sure it's the right thing to do.

Of 415 entries ending with 主義, only 56 are adj-no tagged. I suggest removing that tag from all these entries.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

サル顔の人	100

It's adjectival in expressions like サル顔の人 but this usage doesn't appear to be common.

OK

I don't think this is adj-no. i.e. x サル顔の顔

@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

サル顔	16566
猿顔	10192
さるがお	486
サルがお	1277
さる顔	1321
WWW images, Unidic

Came up in FB discussion. Surprisingly common.

Aligning.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&astron;</field>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ハウメア_(準惑星)
brit daijs

GG5

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=保険給付

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>all the way thorough</gloss>
+<gloss>all the way through</gloss>

最初から最後まで	424232
ＫＯＤ追加語彙, Eijiro, etc.
3 Tanaka sentences

At first I thought "no, it's too obvious", but seeing it's so very common it's probably worth having. I'll index the sentences.

@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>end-to-end</gloss>
+<gloss>all the way thorough</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=最初から最後まで
https://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/最初から最後まで

Probably not "needed" but some indication of a hypernym/hyopnym relationship might help. OTOH maybe it's the role of the dictionary client software to detect/display that rather than having it part of the metastructure.

I don't think these sorts of x-refs are needed for scientific/technical terms.

@@ -12,2 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1662800">造血・ぞうけつ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1662800">造血・ぞうけつ</xref>

KOD

I'm making it "biol" since I think it applies to all animals.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1662800">造血・ぞうけつ</xref>
+<field>&biol;</field>

https://kotobank.jp/word/造血細胞-89260

https://www.intex-osaka.com/en/

Probably better to use the official spelling for places like this one (which have English names)

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>INTEX Ōsaka (exhibition center)</gloss>
+<gloss>INTEX Osaka (exhibition center)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Intekkusuoosaka</gloss>
+<gloss>INTEX Ōsaka (exhibition center)</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>Osaka (Oosaka)</gloss>
+<gloss>Ōsaka</gloss>

This is the best place. エアビーアンドビー is here.

https://celesy.com/lifestyle/18837/

Not sure if main dict is better for this.