aligning w　へらり

@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>foolishly (laughing)</gloss>
-<gloss>thoughtlessly (smiling)</gloss>
+<gloss>(laughing) foolishly</gloss>
+<gloss>(smiling) thoughtlessly</gloss>

I'll add them. Those senses are pretty rare.

@@ -29,0 +30,3 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -36,0 +40 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

to be precise, based on the refs, daijr/daijs do suggest that sense 4 is also vs and that sense 3 is also adv, adv-to, vs.  also sense 4 appears to be [arch]-ish

i think that "sometimes na" note is handled by the presence of the adj-na sense...  it was applied to the whole term, not to that particular sense

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<s_inf>sometimes 〜な</s_inf>

daijr, daijs

Fixed PoS tags.
I don't think "weak-bodied" is a good gloss.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -29 +30,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -32 +33 @@
-<gloss>weak-bodied</gloss>
+<gloss>flimsy</gloss>
@@ -36,2 +37 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
@@ -38,0 +39 @@
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

gg5, daij

Not a noun.

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

Without that "one ingredient", I'd argue it's missing the key element that makes shortcake "shortcake". But I agree that "ショートケーキ" would still be used to refer to American shortcake. I'm fine with this gloss.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>shortcake (layered cream and fruit cake, in Japan, made with sponge cake)</gloss>
+<gloss>shortcake (layered cream and fruit cake; in Japan, made with sponge cake)</gloss>

I think Japanese shortcakes are still shortcakes, just that they replace one ingredient with another.
enwiki for example: 
"Strawberry shortcake is a widely known dessert made with shortcake. Sliced strawberries are mixed with sugar and allowed to sit an 
hour or so, until the strawberries have surrendered a great deal of their juices (macerated). The shortcakes are split and the 
bottoms are covered with a layer of strawberries, juice, and whipped cream, typically flavored with sugar and vanilla. The top is 
replaced, and more strawberries and whipped cream are added onto the top. Some convenience versions of shortcake are not made with a 
shortcake (i.e. biscuit) at all, but instead use a base of sponge cake or sometimes a corn muffin. Japanese-style strawberry 
shortcakes use a sponge cake base, and are a popular Christmas treat in Japan."

I think it's weird to treat it as if the Japanese version is not a shortcake at all considering google image results for [ショートケー
キ] and [shortcake -japanese] are so similar. And a "proper" US/UK strawberry shortcake would still be referred to as a ショートケーキ 
in Japanese, surely.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<lsource xml:lang="eng">shortcake</lsource>
-<gloss>sponge cake with layers of cream and fruit (usu. strawberries)</gloss>
+<gloss>shortcake (layered cream and fruit cake, in Japan, made with sponge cake)</gloss>

ショートケーキ	295198
ショート・ケーキ	887

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ショート・ケーキ</reb>

gg5, daijr
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ショートケーキ

In BrE, "shortcake" refers to shortbread. In AmE, it refers to a type of cake made with short pastry. In Japanese, it refers to a strawberry sponge cake.

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<gloss>shortcake</gloss>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">shortcake</lsource>
+<gloss>sponge cake with layers of cream and fruit (usu. strawberries)</gloss>

I think that's a katakana transcription hangover. Not in references. It can go.
Yes, the others should be split. I'll do that.

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
@@ -8,4 +6,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>by</gloss>
-</sense>
@@ -16,6 +10,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1097840">バイセクシュアル</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>bisexual</gloss>

Where does sense 1 come from? I'm not seeing it in the refs.
Should the "bisexual" sense be a separate entry?

I meant to sign this off.

OED, WN

English dictionaries say "by" is a preposition and adverb. Japanese doesn't have English-style prepositions. I can't find useful examples of it being used in Japanese, so for want of anything better, I'll call it an adverb.

@@ -9,1 +9,1 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -13,1 +13,1 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&int;</pos>

surely sense 1 shouldn't be a noun (no idea how to code for an english preposition) and sense 2 should be an int?

パインナップル	1290

I don't think パインアップル should be hidden. Shinmeikai has it. Possible rk candidate.

@@ -10,0 +11,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パインナップル</reb>

パイナップル	841756	94.5%
パインアップル	20706	2.3%
パイナポー	22213	2.5%
パイナッポー	5906	0.7%

https://kotobank.jp/word/パインアップル-770733
saw in gakkoku entry

@@ -9,0 +10,4 @@
+<reb>パインアップル</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -11 +15 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -15 +19 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

@@ -7,0 +8,8 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パイナポー</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パイナッポー</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

daij, meikyo, sankoku
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/stock-points-meaning/

Added a couple of senses.
GG5 has "〔羅針儀の〕 a course; a point" but I'm not seeing it in the other refs and I can't find any support for it online. I suggest dropping it.
When talking about stocks, "points" does not mean "percentage points". I've created a new sense for this meaning. Although most of the Tanaka sentences are about stock market indexes, I don't think this sense is particularly common. And it doesn't appear to be used for Japanese stock indexes.

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<gloss>key point</gloss>
@@ -12 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>vital point</gloss>
@@ -16,2 +16,20 @@
-<gloss>point (e.g. in stock exchange movement)</gloss>
-<gloss>percentage point</gloss>
+<gloss>point</gloss>
+<gloss>site</gloss>
+<gloss>spot</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>point (in scoring)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>point (in a loyalty program)</gloss>
+<gloss>points</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>(percentage) point</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>(decimal) point</gloss>
@@ -27,3 +45,2 @@
-<gloss>point</gloss>
-<gloss>site</gloss>
-<gloss>spot</gloss>
+<field>&print;</field>
+<gloss>point (unit of type measurement)</gloss>
@@ -33 +50,2 @@
-<gloss>(decimal) point</gloss>
+<field>&stockm;</field>
+<gloss>point (in a stock index)</gloss>
@@ -37 +55,2 @@
-<gloss>point (in scoring)</gloss>
+<field>&fish;</field>
+<gloss>place where many fish gather</gloss>
@@ -41 +60,3 @@
-<gloss>point (in a loyalty program)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1026990">エース・1</xref>
+<field>&cards;</field>
+<gloss>ace</gloss>
@@ -45,2 +66,3 @@
-<field>&print;</field>
-<gloss>point (font size)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2697710">尖頭器</xref>
+<field>&archeol;</field>
+<gloss>(projectile) point</gloss>
@@ -49,6 +70,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>point (on a compass)</gloss>
-<gloss>course</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -55,0 +72 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -57 +74 @@
-<gloss>pointing (to something)</gloss>
+<gloss>to point (at)</gloss>

daijirin #2

e.g. これがポイント

@@ -10,0 +11,2 @@
+<gloss>important part</gloss>
+<gloss>vital point</gloss>

Many 外来語 don't have meanings which map precisely on those of the source. That's why 
comprehensive dictionaries spell them out.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mook_(publishing)
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/mook (2nd definition)

Trying to simplify.
It's virtually never used in English but it's not wasei either.

@@ -9,3 +9,3 @@
-<s_inf>from "magazine" and "book"</s_inf>
-<lsource ls_wasei="y">mook</lsource>
-<gloss>thick illustrated publication on a single topic printed to look like a magazine</gloss>
+<s_inf>from m(agazine) + (b)ook</s_inf>
+<lsource xml:lang="eng">mook</lsource>
+<gloss>book with the look and layout of a magazine</gloss>

I'm not sure about the wasei, but let's leave it like that until proved wrong.

@@ -9,1 +9,1 @@
-<s_inf>from magazine and book</s_inf>
+<s_inf>from "magazine" and "book"</s_inf>

meikyo

i think this is wasei

@@ -9,1 +9,3 @@
-<gloss>mook (thick illustrated publication on a single topic printed to look like a magazine) (from magazine and book)</gloss>
+<s_inf>from magazine and book</s_inf>
+<lsource ls_wasei="y">mook</lsource>
+<gloss>thick illustrated publication on a single topic printed to look like a magazine</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to talk all the night</gloss>
+<gloss>to talk the night away</gloss>
+<gloss>to talk all night</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
語り明かし	29744
語りあかし	1383
かたりあかし	53

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>語りあかす</keb>

OK. Splitting.

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>黙</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -15 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>静寂</re_restr>
@@ -19,3 +14,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>しじま</reb>

GG5 has:
しじま【黙･静寂】
stillness; silence; quietude.
and, of course, せいじゃく【静寂】 etc. My other JEs don't have 黙 but do have しじま without kana.

Yes, maybe should be split as しじま is probably "uk".

Of my refs, none except koj associate しじま with any kanji. koj has 黙・静寂, but my refs only have 静寂 as 
せいじゃく and neither reading for 黙. So I propose splitting しじま out and dropping 黙.

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -25 +25,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 湯船　 │ 571,648 │ 84.2% │
│ 湯舟　 │  85,672 │ 12.6% │
│ 湯槽　 │  10,271 │  1.5% │ - rK (daijr/s, koj, etc.)
│ 湯ぶね │   9,268 │  1.4% │ - sK
│ ゆぶね │   2,243 │  0.3% │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

@@ -28,0 +29 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

With that note I'd leave it where it is. It's the first sense in the JEs (and GG5 only has 込む) and in the Tanaka sentences 40 are using 混む and 8 are using 込む but they ALL mean crowded.

If move it down to sense 3, it still comes 
before the suffixes. I think it's really weird 
to lead with a meaning that's not at all 
common for 込む now that 混む has been split 
out.

I don't think sense 1 should be sandwiched between the suf senses (or moved to the bottom). How about a note?

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<s_inf>usu. 混む</s_inf>

道が混む	6969
道が込む	730

"to be crowded" should probably not lead 
here, with 混む split out?
I suggest making it sense 3, 4, 5 or 6

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2849867">混む</xref>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papermaking

I think one form is enough.

@@ -17,2 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>paper-making</gloss>
-<gloss>paper making</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<gloss>papermaking</gloss>
+<gloss>paper-making</gloss>

GG5, etc.

Tidying

@@ -16,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>paper making or manufacturing</gloss>
+<gloss>paper making</gloss>
+<gloss>paper manufacture</gloss>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>gay</gloss>
+<gloss>gay person</gloss>

同性愛者解放運動	どうせいあいしゃかいほううんどう	gay liberation movement; gay liberation

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>gay</gloss>

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2240460">異性愛者</xref>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="2240460">異性愛者</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2240460">異性愛者</xref>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>paper mill (factory)</gloss>
+<gloss>paper mill</gloss>
+<gloss>paper factory</gloss>

GG5

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>loan</gloss>

GG5, etc.

No, that would be handled by adding 借入 to the 借り入れ entry.

@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>かりいれ</reb>

https://www.ifinance.ne.jp/glossary/loan/loa204.html
https://www.nikkei.com/paper/article/?b=20210711&ng=DGKKZO73766980Q1A710C2CM0000
借入額は3350万円。

@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かりいれ</reb>

Entry created

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>heterosexuality</gloss>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>heterosexuality</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>member of Japan Self-Defense Forces</gloss>
+<gloss>member of the Japan Self-Defense Forces</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Self-Defense Forces personnel</gloss>
+<gloss>member of Japan Self-Defense Forces</gloss>

gg5

seems fine

rather A+B

I agree.

"Heterosexual" and "homosexual" are not antonyms.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<xref type="ant" seq="1917800">同性愛者</xref>
-<gloss>heterosexual</gloss>
+<gloss>heterosexual (person)</gloss>

Entry created

I think we can drop this gloss.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>ambisexual</gloss>

GG5, リーダーズ+プラス

Needed a little more.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>ecosystem (of services, goods etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>ecosystem (of services, goods, etc. within a company or consortium)</gloss>

https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXMZO17354170W7A600C1000000/
https://manetatsu.com/2021/05/339421/

@@ -12,0 +13,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>ecosystem (of services, goods etc.)</gloss>

GG5, 大辞林

Same essay.

I've never heard "nonsexuality" used to refer to asexuality.

@@ -12,3 +12 @@
-<gloss>asexuality</gloss>
-<gloss>nonsexuality</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">lack of sexual attraction or orientation</gloss>
+<gloss>asexuality (lack of sexual attraction to others)</gloss>

All bases covered.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/無性愛
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asexuality

depending on whether you parse it as 無[性愛] or [無性]愛

@@ -11,0 +12,6 @@
+<gloss>asexuality</gloss>
+<gloss>nonsexuality</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">lack of sexual attraction or orientation</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

eij

no support/references for the original meaning provided

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>a non-romantic asexual</gloss>
+<gloss>non-sexual love</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>volunteer organization (organisation)</gloss>
+<gloss>volunteer organization</gloss>

ボランティア組織	17159
研究社ビジネス英和辞典

A bit A+B.

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=ボランティア組織

use fullwidth per editorial policy

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>Xジェンダー</keb>
+<keb>Ｘジェンダー</keb>

*I've heard Xジェンダー used...

I see ノンバイナリー gets more hits on twitter.

I assumed that "Xジェンダー" was a somewhat dated term that will soon be superseded by ノンバイナリー (if it hasn't happened already). I've encountered ノンバイナリー in writing on more than one occasion and I suspect it's the preferred term among LGBT communities in Japan.

https://www.newsweek.com/gender-x-new-
identity-states-washington-vermont-775221

What's the point of the xref? I've heard ジェン
ダー used in Japanese but never ノンバイナリー so 
if the intention is for it to be interpreted 
as "more commonly as", I'm not sure that's 
correct.

@@ -14,2 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>non-binary (gender)</gloss>
-<gloss>non-binary person</gloss>
+<gloss>gender X</gloss>
+<gloss>non-binary gender</gloss>

"医薬品や医療機器などの製造販売を厚生労働大臣が承認すること"
薬事承認	        3447
薬事承認し	No matches
薬事承認する	No matches

I wouldn't consider it a pharmacy term.
Not just drugs.
Not vs.

@@ -12,3 +12 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<field>&pharm;</field>
-<gloss>(new) drug approval</gloss>
+<gloss>regulatory approval of a drug or medical device</gloss>

KOD

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>to approve the manufacture and sale of pharmaceuticals and medical devices by the minister of health, labor and welfare</gloss>
+<field>&pharm;</field>
+<gloss>(new) drug approval</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/薬事承認-2133326

医薬品や医療機器などの製造販売を厚生労働大臣が承認すること

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>どうしても言うのなら</keb>
+<keb>どうしてもと言うのなら</keb>

如何してもと言うなら	< 20
どうしても言うなら  176
どうしてもと言うのなら	1678
GG5 examples

More common form

@@ -5 +5,4 @@
-<keb>如何してもと言うなら</keb>
+<keb>どうしても言うのなら</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>如何してもと言うのなら</keb>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<reb>どうしてもというなら</reb>
+<reb>どうしてもというのなら</reb>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=どうしてもと言うなら
https://ja.ichacha.net/english/どうしてもと言うなら.html

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

The couple of days are up.

Quiet. I'll approve then reopen for a couple of days.

Attempting to set it up I guess it's OK?

@@ -9 +9,5 @@
-<gloss>What is it? What's the matter? I wonder</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2015040">ざます</xref>
+<s_inf>role language, e.g. in anime</s_inf>
+<gloss>what is it?</gloss>
+<gloss>what's the matter?</gloss>
+<gloss>I wonder</gloss>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&psych;</field>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/単純接触効果

繰り返し接すると好意度や印象が高まるという効果

We've had 日本語能力試験, 大学入試センター試験, etc. for years.

Better for the names dictionary?

日商簿記検定	50576

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>The Official Business Skill Test in Book-keeping</gloss>
+<gloss>Official Business Skill Test in Bookkeeping (JCCI bookkeeping proficiency test)</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/日商簿記検定

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<gloss>thoughtlessly (smiling)</gloss>
+<gloss>(smiling) thoughtlessly</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1011420">ヘラヘラ・1</xref>

Google ngram corpus:
へらりと　	1663
ヘラリと　	293
へらりと笑う	256
へらりと笑った	165
Not in the usual dictionaries.

@@ -8,2 +8,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>foolishly (laughing) Similar to ヘラヘラ (or perhaps this should be a note for that word?)</gloss>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<gloss>(laughing) foolishly</gloss>
+<gloss>thoughtlessly (smiling)</gloss>

I guess google for "へらりと笑う"

Came across this whilst reading a children's book: 人狼サバイバル 

ヒョウがへらりと笑った

Correct, except when it's an adjective.

"side by side" isn't usually hyphenated.
Simplifying the lit gloss.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>to work together (in the same class, workplace)</gloss>
+<gloss>to work together (in the same class, workplace, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to sit side-by- side</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="lit">to line up (one's) desks next to each other</gloss>
+<gloss>to sit side by side</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">to put (one's) desks side by side</gloss>

I think it's OK as-is.

Should maybe be two senses, literal (per 
example) and idiom (per daijs)?

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>
@@ -15 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to sit side-by-side</gloss>
+<gloss>to sit side-by- side</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">to line up (one's) desks next to each other</gloss>

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

OK, I'll move them to the main entry as "ik" and leave it at that.

I agree with Marcus that they shouldn't be a separate entry. The note will probably confuse people.
I'm still of the view that these forms aren't needed. Can't they be added to the glossing file instead?

パイナップル	841756
パイナポー	22213
パイナッポー	5906

I feel it's best to keep this pair separate as they're really comic/quirky variants. If they were part of the パイナップル entry we'd need a comment to indicate their context and it would be a bit messy.

Should this really be a separate entry from パ
イナップル?

Closing.

Split from 1593410. See discussion there.

Majority of my refs don't display kanji forms.
Sankoku and smk say that しじま is a jukujikun for 静寂, 沈黙, and 無言.

黙 is in gg5 and koj.

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

shinmeikai: 〔雅〕
gakken: {文章語}

None of the refs have kanji for this except NHK日本語発音アクセント辞典, which has 静寂, and shinmeikai, which has the following note: "文脈によって「{無言}・{沈黙}・{静寂}」などの字をあてる". Putting 静寂 first.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>黙</keb>
+<keb>静寂</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>静寂</keb>
+<keb>黙</keb>
@@ -15 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1381910">静寂・せいじゃく</xref>
+<misc>&form;</misc>

Split from 1381910.

途中 （とちゅう） (n,adv) (1) on the way; en route; halfway; (n,adv)  (2) in the middle of; midway

I was wavering, but I agree it's probably not needed.

I don't see a need for this. A+B. Meaning is obvious.

途中まで	737846
途中までは	125258
途中までが	1792
途中までな	1929
途中までの	20400

@@ -11,3 +11,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>in the middle of, halfway through</gloss>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>midway</gloss>
+<gloss>halfway</gloss>
+<gloss>part of the way</gloss>

https://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/途中まで

酸素缶	8528

Domestic; not industrial or diving.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>oxygen tank</gloss>
+<gloss>oxygen can</gloss>

https://item.rakuten.co.jp/offer1999/of125/?iasid=07rpp_10095___e4-kqxklq9k-4hw-100bc8a9-fac3-4570-91df-fce5f7f70fb3
https://hinative.com/ja/questions/2692961

GG5, etc.

I think the basic term is enough.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>putrefaction tank</gloss>

wiki
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/腐敗槽

daijr/s
パツパツ	        19439
パッツンパッツン	11040
パツンパツン	10176
ぱつぱつ	        1228
ぱっつんぱっつん	2549 
ぱつんぱつん	1555
---
パツパツの	2039 
パツパツな	1711

@@ -3,0 +4,15 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パツパツ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パッツンパッツン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パツンパツン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ぱつぱつ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ぱっつんぱっつん</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -7,0 +23,9 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>bursting at the seams</gloss>
+<gloss>bulging</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>パツパツ</stagr>
+<stagr>ぱつぱつ</stagr>
@@ -10,2 +34 @@
-<gloss>bursting at the seams</gloss>
-<gloss>tightly</gloss>
+<gloss>snip-snip (of scissors)</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/ぱつんぱつん-603096
https://hinative.com/en-US/questions/15504757

Quiet

KOD: 卒業研究 postgraduate [graduate] research.

I now think KOD is wrong about the "postgraduate".
I'll approve this, align and approve 卒業研究, then reopen them both for a bit. I'll also tweak 卒業論文 a bit.

@@ -15,2 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>postgraduate research (esp. leading to a masters or doctoral thesis)</gloss>
-<gloss>graduate research</gloss>
+<gloss>research for a graduation thesis</gloss>
+<gloss>graduation thesis work</gloss>
+<gloss>graduation research project</gloss>

It don't think it's specifically postgraduate research. Jitsuyo defines it as "卒業論文を作成するために行われる研究・実験のこと". An undergraduate thesis also involves 卒業研究.

http://www.f.waseda.jp/kane/sp_sotsuken/

I've proposed an entry for 卒業研究 and I think the glosses should be aligned.

@@ -12,4 +12,5 @@
-<s_inf>abbr. of 卒業研究</s_inf>
-<gloss>research for a graduation thesis</gloss>
-<gloss>graduation thesis work</gloss>
-<gloss>graduation research project</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2849881">卒業研究</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2849881">卒業研究</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>postgraduate research (esp. leading to a masters or doctoral thesis)</gloss>
+<gloss>graduate research</gloss>

I think this works.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>striving to earn points (in loyalty programs)</gloss>
+<gloss>accumulating points (in loyalty programs)</gloss>

https://point-g.rakuten.co.jp/rapoikatsu/articles/2020/p_how2/

Hard to gloss.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&col;</misc>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>striving to earn points (in loyalty programs)</gloss>
+<gloss>accumulating points (in loyalty programs)</gloss>

https://point-g.rakuten.co.jp/rapoikatsu/articles/2020/p_how2/

小水力	71957
小水力発電	65093  <- already an entry
小水力利用	3397	   (next highest)

I guess it's useful too.

https://hachidori-denryoku.jp/qanda/

OK.
Yes, Google counts are hopeless, as I've been told by people there, but the relative frequency of the unique snippets can give you a vague idea of the actual quantity.

Should we include some extra detail to indicate that it's not a general term?
By the way, there's no way to know the true number of hits on Google. Clicking to the last page of results always gives you a small number.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>non-fossil fuel energy value trading market</gloss>
+<gloss>non-fossil fuel energy value trading market (established in 2018 by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry)</gloss>

95 real WWW bits

Less necessary now that 非化石 is in, but maybe useful.

It was formed in 2018 so it won't show up in the n-grams. It gets quite a few hits online.
Still, I'm not sure it's worth adding. I wouldn't object if it's rejected.
I've approved those 非化石 submissions.

0 n-grams for this.
非化石	2210	  
非化石エネルギー	1168	  
非化石燃料	915

I think rather than having this uncommon clunky term, better to have an entry for 非化石 and its common compounds.  I have proposed them, and if they are approved we can see where this fits in, if at all.

https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=134d14be-0937-43c2-949d-27b9fb6118da  - "A Non-Fossil Fuel Certificate was introduced in 2018. The Certificate, which embodies the zero-emission value created by a renewable project under the FIT programme, is issued by a governmental agency and sold to electricity retailers at auction. The scope of electricity generators eligible to receive the Non-Fossil Fuel Certificate has been expanded since November 2019 to cover the 'post-FIT' non-fossil fuel power generation, and was also expanded in April 2020 to cover non-fossil fuel power generation outside of the FIT programme. As such, the industry landscape surrounding the Non-Fossil Fuel Certificate may change in the future."

Probably worth having.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Non-Fossil Certificate</gloss>
+<gloss>Non-Fossil Fuel Certificate</gloss>

https://hachidori-denryoku.jp/qanda/
https://tr-ex.me/翻訳/日本人-英語/非化石証書

gg5, jwiki
G n-grams: 20932

daijr, jwiki