gg5, etc. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jersey_(clothing)

It seems that ジャージー has wider usage than "jersey" in English. I think the clothing sense needs to be split.

@@ -19 +19,5 @@
-<gloss>(sports) uniform</gloss>
+<gloss>(sports) uniform top</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&cloth;</field>

genius; wisdom

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>sweatsuit</gloss>
+<gloss>tracksuit</gloss>

I think it goes a bit too far already.

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>jersey (clothing)</gloss>
+<field>&cloth;</field>
+<gloss>jersey</gloss>
@@ -19,3 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>sweatsuit</gloss>
-<gloss>tracksuit</gloss>
-<gloss>sweats</gloss>

daijs
小学館 プログレッシブ和英中辞典

Not sure if sense 2 should be further split up or not.

@@ -13 +13,13 @@
-<gloss>jersey</gloss>
+<gloss>jersey (fabric)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>jersey (clothing)</gloss>
+<gloss>(sports) uniform</gloss>
+<gloss>sweatsuit</gloss>
+<gloss>tracksuit</gloss>
+<gloss>sweats</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>Jersey (cattle)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>named after the US stapler company, Hotchkiss</s_inf>
+<s_inf>named after the US stapler company "Hotchkiss"</s_inf>

Should include the name somewhere.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>named after the US stapler company</s_inf>
+<s_inf>named after the US stapler company, Hotchkiss</s_inf>

http://nihongo.monash.edu/hotchkiss.html

Wrong Hotchkiss.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>named after Benjamin Hotchkiss</s_inf>
+<s_inf>named after the US stapler company</s_inf>

https://jisho.org/forum/5d132f2ed5dda71944000054-origin-of-name

Better to not specify what he did or didn't do (if he wasn't actually the inventor)

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<s_inf>named after the inventor, Hotchkiss</s_inf>
+<s_inf>named after Benjamin Hotchkiss</s_inf>

meikyo, smk

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daij, koj, gg5

Sense 1 isn't an abbreviation in the refs.
I think sense 2 should be glossed as a verb.

@@ -11,2 +11 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1057970">サランラップ</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>plastic wrap</gloss>
@@ -14 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>plastic wrap</gloss>
@@ -15,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>food wrap</gloss>
@@ -18 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20 +18 @@
-<gloss>wrapping (something up)</gloss>
+<gloss>to wrap in plastic wrap</gloss>

All quiet.

Reopen.

悪賢い	9419
わるがしこい	301
悪がしこい	386
Koj and Nikkoku gloss 黠奴 as "悪がしこいやつ".

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>悪がしこい</keb>

NHK is notoriously picky about its use of words, but that doesn't mean it's the arbiter of the meanings. In line with the references I quoted I think "(esp. someone killed)" is enough. Splitting into two senses looks messy. (This essentially goes back to the anonymous edit of 2023-09-04.)

@@ -22,6 +21,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>dead</gloss>
-<gloss>death</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -30 +24 @@
-<gloss>victim</gloss>
+<gloss>victim (esp. someone killed)</gloss>

But the NHK reference essentially makes it clear that if this word or 犠牲者 are used in news reporting, they refer to the number of deaths. Isn't it misleading then to just mention it as an exp, while the second gloss is "casualty" which is how the word just isn't used in news media?

@@ -21,0 +22,6 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>dead</gloss>
+<gloss>death</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -24 +30 @@
-<gloss>victim (esp. someone killed)</gloss>
+<gloss>victim</gloss>

I think the "(esp. someone killed)" covers it adequately. I'll drop that proposed death/dead sense.

@@ -26,5 +25,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>death</gloss>
-<gloss>dead</gloss>

https://www.nhk.or.jp/bunken/research/kotoba/pdf/20150301_5.pdf
Ｑ　「犠牲者」
犠牲者は死者だけでなくけが人も含むはずで，
犠牲者＝死者という使い方には疑問を感じます。
Ａ　「犠牲者」は，一般に「亡くなった人」のこと
を指すものと解釈されています。
[...]

　「犠牲」の本来の意味からはずれるため，事故
の原因が無謀な行いや計画にあるような場合に
は，抵抗感をもつ人もいるので，注意する。また，
個々の事例については，「～して死亡しました」の
ように，具体的に言うほうがよい場合もある。
（『NHK ことばのハンドブック（第 2 版）』p.58）

I can't say I've ever seen it used for injured people.

@@ -24 +24 @@
-<gloss>victim</gloss>
+<gloss>victim (esp. someone killed)</gloss>

Well, if I was adding a form using 强 it would be here, but I agree it's really off the radar. If the JIS committee never considered it was worth adding to JIS X 0213, it's a good indication of its total obscurity.

@@ -9,4 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>强い</keb>
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

I don't think that form is needed. I'm not seeing any evidence that it's actually used. Seems arbitrary to add it here but not to every other entry that contains 強 (and I'm definitely not suggesting we do that).

From rejected 2849353.

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>强い</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

Sorted out example tagging - couldn't find any in the 317 that matched sense 3.

daij gg5

google images is mostly muscles so I moved "brawny" higher 
up than it comes in gg5

@@ -19,2 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>powerful</gloss>
-<gloss>mighty</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +20,3 @@
+<gloss>competent</gloss>
+<gloss>domineering</gloss>
+<gloss>tough</gloss>
@@ -25,2 +26,19 @@
-<s_inf>... に強い</s_inf>
-<gloss>resistant</gloss>
+<gloss>strong</gloss>
+<gloss>brawny</gloss>
+<gloss>powerful</gloss>
+<gloss>healthy</gloss>
+<gloss>rugged</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>good (at)</gloss>
+<gloss>skilled</gloss>
+<gloss>knowledgeable</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<s_inf>as 〜に強い</s_inf>
+<gloss>being able to handle</gloss>
+<gloss>know how to deal (with)</gloss>
+<gloss>durable (against)</gloss>
+<gloss>resistant (to)</gloss>
@@ -28 +46,18 @@
-<gloss>durable</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>firm</gloss>
+<gloss>rigid</gloss>
+<gloss>solid</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>intense</gloss>
+<gloss>strong</gloss>
+<gloss>fierce</gloss>
+<gloss>high</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>dependable</gloss>
+<gloss>trustworthy</gloss>

daijs: 古く、また仏教では「げんぜ」
shinmeikai: 仏教用語では「げんぜ」

げんぜ isn't obsolete in Buddhist contexts.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>

OK. I'll split it.

@@ -9,3 +8,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>現し世</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -14 +10,0 @@
-<re_restr>現世</re_restr>
@@ -20 +15,0 @@
-<re_restr>現世</re_restr>
@@ -24,5 +18,0 @@
-<re_restr>現世</re_restr>
-<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>うつしよ</reb>

gg5, prog, daij, etc.

All the refs lead with げんせ.
I think 現し世 should be a separate entry. Merges likes this are kind of messy.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<reb>げんせい</reb>
+<reb>げんせ</reb>
@@ -19 +19 @@
-<reb>げんせ</reb>
+<reb>げんせい</reb>
@@ -33 +32,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -36,4 +35,2 @@
-<gloss>present world</gloss>
-<gloss>present age</gloss>
-<gloss>transient world</gloss>
-<gloss>life</gloss>
+<gloss>this world</gloss>
+<gloss>this life</gloss>
@@ -44 +40,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -46 +42 @@
-<gloss>recent epoch (i.e. the Holocene epoch)</gloss>
+<gloss>current epoch (i.e. the Holocene epoch)</gloss>

daijs, meikyo

@@ -9,0 +9,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>現し世</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +14,1 @@
+<re_restr>現世</re_restr>
@@ -16,0 +20,1 @@
+<re_restr>現世</re_restr>
@@ -19,0 +24,1 @@
+<re_restr>現世</re_restr>

gg5 koj daij weblio

@@ -18,0 +19,6 @@
+<gloss>small</gloss>
+<gloss>little</gloss>
+<gloss>tiny</gloss>
+<gloss>insignificant</gloss>
+<gloss>humble</gloss>
+<gloss>modest</gloss>
@@ -21 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>modest</gloss>

n-grams
ささやかな	28037
細やかな	9364

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

I'm not entirely opposed to the idea, but I'm not really sure what's at stake. The form isn't completely hidden, just moved to a note.

We've used this style on quite a few entries recently. See 1164780 (一挺), 1167270 (一旒), 1299600 (杜鵑花), 1260670 (因・もと), 1588320 (撮す), etc.

Since this is a policy decision that affects many entries, it would be best to have this discussion on github or the mailing list.

i don't think it's a good idea to hide a kanji form that is in multiple references and in absolute numbers pretty common
imo it's better to split it off and cross-reference it

@@ -9,4 +8,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>採り上げる</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -25,8 +20,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>採りあげる</keb>
-<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>採上げる</keb>
@@ -49 +37 @@
-<s_inf>sometimes written as 採り上げる</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="2860162">採り上げる</xref>

I think this is OK. I've reindexed the sentences to match.

I think 7 senses is fine, but I think senses 02 and 03 proposed by penname01 are overlapping a bit. I don't think the glosses for sense 03 ("to take up (a topic, etc.); to deal with; to treat") correctly capture the meaning of the corresponding sense in the kokugos.

Meikyo 3e:
  ③［取］特に取り立てて問題にする。「欠陥商品を━・げて糾弾する」「弱点を━・げて非難する」
Shinsen 10e:
  ⑥特別に問題とする。「━ほどのものでない」
Sankoku 8e:
  ④問題と〈する／してあつかう〉。「大きく━・━必要のない問題」

I am proposing that we gloss this sense with something like "to take issue with; to make a problem of; to bring up (as a point of criticism)"

Meikyo 2e has the 採 form for this sense, but the third edition dropped it. I think we can make 採り上げる a hidden form and add a note to sense 02, which is where most refs put it. I wouldn't object to splitting it into a separate entry either.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -42 +41,0 @@
-<stagk>取り上げる</stagk>
@@ -50,2 +49,3 @@
-<s_inf>esp. 採り上げる</s_inf>
-<gloss>to adopt (e.g. a proposal)</gloss>
+<s_inf>sometimes written as 採り上げる</s_inf>
+<gloss>to adopt (a proposal)</gloss>
+<gloss>to take up (a topic)</gloss>
@@ -54 +53,0 @@
-<gloss>to take up (a complaint, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -59,4 +58,3 @@
-<s_inf>esp. 取り上げる</s_inf>
-<gloss>to take up (a topic, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>to deal with</gloss>
-<gloss>to treat</gloss>
+<gloss>to take issue with</gloss>
+<gloss>to make a problem of</gloss>
+<gloss>to bring up (as a point of criticism)</gloss>
@@ -65 +62,0 @@
-<stagk>取り上げる</stagk>
@@ -73 +69,0 @@
-<stagk>取り上げる</stagk>
@@ -84 +79,0 @@
-<stagk>取り上げる</stagk>
@@ -90 +84,0 @@
-<stagk>取り上げる</stagk>

this entry previously had 5 senses
採り上げる is definitely not [sK] as it's present in sankoku, meikyo, shinkoku, obunsha
sankoku does have a separate entry for 採り上げる, so maybe we could follow their lead and split it (and cross-reference it here)
i think that having "to adopt (e.g. a proposal)" and "to report (news)" in the same sense is confusing, they're pretty different things
it's true that the (current) 3 and 4 senses can be merged as they're basically the same thing which would result in 6 senses

Removing [ichi1] from the hidden 取上げる form.

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>

I think this is OK. I've reindexed the sentences to match.

I think 7 senses is fine, but I think senses 02 and 03 proposed by penname01 are overlapping a bit. I don't think the glosses for sense 03 ("to take up (a topic, etc.); to deal with; to treat") correctly capture the meaning of the corresponding sense in the kokugos.

Meikyo 3e:
  ③［取］特に取り立てて問題にする。「欠陥商品を━・げて糾弾する」「弱点を━・げて非難する」
Shinsen 10e:
  ⑥特別に問題とする。「━ほどのものでない」
Sankoku 8e:
  ④問題と〈する／してあつかう〉。「大きく━・━必要のない問題」

I am proposing that we gloss this sense with something like "to take issue with; to make a problem of; to bring up (as a point of criticism)"

Meikyo 2e has the 採 form for this sense, but the third edition dropped it. I think we can make 採り上げる a hidden form and add a note to sense 02, which is where most refs put it. I wouldn't object to splitting it into a separate entry either.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -42 +41,0 @@
-<stagk>取り上げる</stagk>
@@ -50,2 +49,3 @@
-<s_inf>esp. 採り上げる</s_inf>
-<gloss>to adopt (e.g. a proposal)</gloss>
+<s_inf>sometimes written as 採り上げる</s_inf>
+<gloss>to adopt (a proposal)</gloss>
+<gloss>to take up (a topic)</gloss>
@@ -54 +53,0 @@
-<gloss>to take up (a complaint, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -59,4 +58,3 @@
-<s_inf>esp. 取り上げる</s_inf>
-<gloss>to take up (a topic, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>to deal with</gloss>
-<gloss>to treat</gloss>
+<gloss>to take issue with</gloss>
+<gloss>to make a problem of</gloss>
+<gloss>to bring up (as a point of criticism)</gloss>
@@ -65 +62,0 @@
-<stagk>取り上げる</stagk>
@@ -73 +69,0 @@
-<stagk>取り上げる</stagk>
@@ -84 +79,0 @@
-<stagk>取り上げる</stagk>
@@ -90 +84,0 @@
-<stagk>取り上げる</stagk>

this entry previously had 5 senses
採り上げる is definitely not [sK] as it's present in sankoku, meikyo, shinkoku, obunsha
sankoku does have a separate entry for 採り上げる, so maybe we could follow their lead and split it (and cross-reference it here)
i think that having "to adopt (e.g. a proposal)" and "to report (news)" in the same sense is confusing, they're pretty different things
it's true that the (current) 3 and 4 senses can be merged as they're basically the same thing which would result in 6 senses

Of all the references I checked (JES & Kokugos) only Meikyo mentioned 採り上げる. GG5 has sense 2 for 取り上げる so that "esp." looks rather doubtful. Also, the JEs have 4 senses which I think works well. I think the 7 senses is overdoing it.
I'd be OK with making 採り上げる [sK], goin back to 4 senses, and stripping out all the notes and restrictions.

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5
政府打倒	1150

None of the examples in the refs mention boxing.
I don't agree with pref. We don't have suf for usage like 政府打倒. I think it's just quirky grammar that only appears in slogans.

@@ -17,2 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&pref;</pos>
-<gloss>knockdown (e.g. in boxing)</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +19,2 @@
+<gloss>bringing down</gloss>
+<gloss>knockdown</gloss>

打倒日本	1697
打倒安倍	1026
打倒亀田	989
打倒安倍政権	809
打倒帝国	300	  
打倒帝国主義	149

gakken gives the example 「打倒横綱」
I've also heard 打倒電撃文庫 in anime

I wonder if this usage comes from Chinese political slogans in the 20th century

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&pref;</pos>

gg5

Sense 2 is archaic. I don't think it's needed. Daijr has a third archaic sense.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>to be clothed in</gloss>
@@ -17,10 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>to be clothed</gloss>
-<gloss>to be dressed</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v5u;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<misc>&uk;</misc>
-<gloss>to twine around</gloss>
-<gloss>to twist around</gloss>
-<gloss>to coil around</gloss>
+<gloss>to be dressed in</gloss>
+<gloss>to be wrapped in</gloss>

GG5, etc.

ウィズダム英和辞典 / ウィズダム和英辞典
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/en/纏う/#je-71844

added definition

@@ -16,0 +17,2 @@
+<gloss>to be clothed</gloss>
+<gloss>to be dressed</gloss>

Daijs, etc.
纏う	85156
を纏う	40603

We don't mix the plain and potential forms in the one entry.

@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>纏える</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -13,3 +9,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>まとえる</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +17,8 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5u;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to twine around</gloss>
+<gloss>to twist around</gloss>
+<gloss>to coil around</gloss>

gg5, daij

Doesn't refer to the child itself.

@@ -15,2 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>mental retardation</gloss>
-<gloss>backward or late-developing child</gloss>
+<gloss>delayed mental development</gloss>
+<gloss>cognitive delay</gloss>
+<gloss>late-developing intelligence</gloss>

shinmeikai

0 ngrams but a handful of legit hits

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>遅智慧</keb>

GG5, etc.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>mental retardation</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +15,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1678690">後知恵</xref>
+<gloss>hindsight</gloss>
+<gloss>wisdom after the event</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5 koj daij

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>to go about one's work</gloss>
+<gloss>to be busy at work</gloss>
+<gloss>to work diligently</gloss>

G n-grams:
立ち働く	4015
たち働く	899
立ちはたらく	29

たち働く had me puzzled.

@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>たち働く</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>立ちはたらく</keb>

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1937760">修正液</xref>

Entry created

I think this is just amplifying sense 1 a little, and is covered by the note. The DBJG mentions "emphasize his point emotionally" (p 327).

@@ -20,4 +19,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<gloss>talking about something emotively</gloss>

dictionary of basic japanese grammar

seems good to at least mention this second meaning?

@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<gloss>talking about something emotively</gloss>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<s_inf>の and ん add emphasis; ～です forms are more polite</s_inf>
+<s_inf>の and ん add emphasis</s_inf>

のです	184806448
のだ	70948448
んです	176707857
んだ	151359170

I guess so. We split なのです and なのだ. I'll do that now.
I like keeping the terms in the indices complete as it helps identify modifications to the sentences themselves. Around 50-70 sentences get changed each week and I have software that tracks and identifies the changes. The completeness of the indices is central to this.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<reb>のだ</reb>
+<reb>んです</reb>
@@ -11,6 +10,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>んです</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>んだ</reb>

I still think it'd be better off split. Do these two really need to be linked to hundreds of example sentences? Shouldn't a few each be 
enough?

@@ -14,4 +14 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2087820">のだ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2087820">のだ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2087820">のだ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2087820">のだ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2849387">のだ</xref>

G n-grams:
なのだ	12135096
なんだ	37786630 - also 何だ

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2087820">のだ</xref>

N-gram

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>詫びをいれる</keb>
+<keb>詫びを入れる</keb>
@@ -8 +8,4 @@
-<keb>詫びを入れる</keb>
+<keb>わびを入れる</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>詫びをいれる</keb>

Entry created

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<field>&zool;</field>

Entry created

https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/techno-superliner-japan-1989-2005.22696/
https://www.marinelink.com/article/ship-electronics/techno-superliner-prototype-during-467
https://web-japan.org/atlas/technology/tec06.html

All the references are only about cargo. We have TSL entry.

https://tabiris.com/archives/ogasawara-
airport2020/
is "cargo" correct? it was considered for use
 as a high-speed passenger ferry to ogasawara
("TSL" should probably be an entry as well, 
used repeatedly in the article)

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>テクノ・スーパーライナー</reb>

Entry created

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloaca

"cloacae" is plural.

@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2437180">総排出腔・そうはいしゅつこう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2437180">総排出腔</xref>
+<field>&zool;</field>
@@ -22 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>cloacae</gloss>

I think it's more irregular than old.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&iK;</ke_inf>

総排泄腔	856
総排泄口	726
Maybe oK since it's not in the kokugos, but with that many ngrams, I'm not so sure.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>総排泄口</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<re_restr>総排泄腔</re_restr>

医学英和辞典, Igaku, etc.

@@ -17,0 +17,1 @@
+<gloss>cloacae</gloss>

nikkoku
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/総排出腔

meikyo entry for 申し上げる

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&hum;</misc>

I don't think the exclamation marks are needed.
Should maybe be tagged as pol or hum.

@@ -21,2 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>my sincere congratulations!</gloss>
-<gloss>please accept my congratulations!</gloss>
+<gloss>my sincere congratulations</gloss>
+<gloss>please accept my congratulations</gloss>

Even with phrases, we usually don't usually capitalize the first word.

@@ -21,2 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>My sincere congratulations!</gloss>
-<gloss>Please accept my congratulations!</gloss>
+<gloss>my sincere congratulations!</gloss>
+<gloss>please accept my congratulations!</gloss>

Looks good.

https://www.britannica.com/art/balletto

Splitting on source word.
"balletto" appears to be a rather obscure term. The Encyclopaedia Britannica was the only reference I could find.
I don't think we need "Barrett" in the main dictionary. Google image results are no longer dominated by pictures of guns.

@@ -11,10 +11 @@
-<gloss>balletto</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>barret</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">beret-like hat</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>Barrett (brand of firearms)</gloss>
+<gloss>balletto (16th-17th century genre of light vocal composition)</gloss>

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/バレット
リーダーズ+プラス

Sense 3 is already in Enamdict, and is probably not essential here, however Google images for バレット is dominated by pictures of rifles.

@@ -9 +9,2 @@
-<gloss g_type="tm">boxercise</gloss>
+<field>&tradem;</field>
+<gloss>boxercise</gloss>

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss g_type="tm">Boxercise</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="tm">boxercise</gloss>

* https://www.lexico.com/definition/boxercise
* https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/boxercise
* https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/american/boxercise

* https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Boxercise,boxercise&year_start=1990&year_end=2019

OED/Collins/Macmillan also have it lowercased, so safe to say it's been genericized.

New tag.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<gloss>Boxercise (trademark)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="tm">Boxercise</gloss>

mirriam-webster has without caps

it may be a generic now.  the english wiki page was clearly written by someone with a financial interest

9 days and no real support. I'll delete it so it can be revived; unlike a dead fish.

マグロは止まると死ぬ	40
マグロは止まると	108
鮪は止まると	< 20
まぐろは止まると	< 20

Yes, the (relatively few) pages mentioning it are all about the fish. Unless someone can provide a proper reference or two, I'll drop it.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>マグロは止まると死ぬ</reb>
+<reb>マグロはとまるとしぬ</reb>

no ref provided.  a google search brings up the obvious literal translations but i don't see any for the figurative meaning

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&net-sl;</misc>

Looks OK.

設定厨	1480 (!)
pixiv: (侮辱的に)

an attempt.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>person who has been obsessed with devising the original world view and the setting of original character</gloss>
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<gloss>would-be creator (esp. writer) who is overly preoccupied with the background setting of their story</gloss>

https://lifelikewriter.com/story-setting/

オリジナルの世界観やオリキャラの設定をひたすら練ることに取り憑かれてしまった人のこと

OK. I think what goes for this one applies to iDeCo accounts too.

i'm not sure about iDeCo/イデコ, but i think this belongs here.  it's like a roth ira or tfsa, which are just types of savings accounts, not products.

Move to JMnedict as a "product"?
BTW, we should have an iDeCo/イデコ entry too.

https://kotobank.jp/word/少額投資非課税制度-678303
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/少額投資非課税制度
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nippon_individual_savings_account

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&finc;</field>

https://kotobank.jp/word/個人型確定拠出年金-798002
https://www.ideco-koushiki.jp/english/

OK on its own. I need to watch out that it doesn't attach to sentences with んだ in them. I think it won't because they are linked to のだ.

Could/should this go as another sense in the existing んだ entry (2087820).

various dialect dictionaries on weblio
https://www.weblio.jp/content/んだ

I wavered a bit on this, but I remembered hearing about it so I decided just to wave it through. I'm not fussed by that explanation.

I think any (non-technical) term that isn't in English dictionaries (or at least widely known) needs a short description.

Aren't we adding a little too many explanations to many glosses recently? Even if you don't know exactly what "hot yoga" is, it's apparent 
it's a form of yoga. Do we really need to give more detail than that?

I'd never heard of it.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>hot yoga</gloss>
+<gloss>hot yoga (yoga performed under hot and humid conditions)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_yoga

@@ -8,0 +9,6 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ホット・ヨガ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ホット・ヨーガ</reb>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&biol;</field>

LSD

https://health.joyplot.com/HealthWordsWiki/?メラニン凝集ホルモン

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&sl;</misc>

太パパ	6343

I don't think it's just with 援助交際.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>sugar daddy who spends a lot of money on compensated dating</gloss>
+<gloss>big-spending sugar daddy</gloss>

https://xn--cck4draa9dzb4b2316g.com/howto-start/technique/find-bigpapa/

太パパとは パパ活に多額のお金をつぎ込んでくれるパパ の事を言います

i agree

繊細さん	484

I'm not sure this is worth an entry. You can tack さん on all sorts of attributes. It's not even that common.

https://lee.hpplus.jp/kurashinohint/1842966/

とても感受性が強く繊細な気質を生まれ持った人のこと

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&law;</field>

Plenty of hits online for this now. ngrams are outdated.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙
性的同意年齢	47
性交同意年齢	28 - xref to 同意年齢
同意年齢	163

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

https://kotobank.jp/word/性交同意年齢-2133593

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

医学英和辞典, RP

https://kotobank.jp/word/性交不能症-846007
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/性交不能症

ＫＯＤ追加語彙
性的同意年齢	47
性交同意年齢	28
同意年齢	163

Please do not dump entire dictionary definitions in entry amendments. Ideally we would like to see concise arguments for new edits, and you can use brief quotations from references if you feel it is necessary to get your point across.

This is the entry for 同意年齢. Edits to the entry for 業病 should be made in its entry.

旺文社国語辞典 第十一版 画像無し
 ごう‐びょう【業病】ゴフビヤウ
前世で悪いことをした報いでかかるといわれた治りにくい病気。

広辞苑 第七版
 ごう‐びょう 【業病】 ゴフビヤウ
悪業あくごうの報いでかかると考えられていた難病。保元物語（金刀比羅本）「―この時をかぎりとぞ」

大辞林 第三版
 ごう びょう （ごふびやう） [0]【業病】
悪いおこないの報いとしてかかるとされた，なおりにくく，つらい病気。

デジタル大辞泉
 ごう‐びょう〔ゴフビヤウ〕【業病】
前世の悪業 (あくごう) の報いでかかるとされた、治りにくい病気。難病。

明鏡国語辞典 第二版
 ごう‐びょう【業病】(ゴフビャウ)
〘名〙かつて、前世の悪業(あくごう)の報いでかかるとされた治りにくい病気。

三省堂国語辞典　第七版
 ごう びょう【業病】（名）
〔文〕（悪いことをしたために かかると考えられた）なおりにくい病気。

新明解国語辞典　第七版
 ごう（オ） びょう（オ） ⓪ ゴフビヤウ【業病】
〔前世の悪事の結果であると考えられていた〕難病。

精選版　日本国語大辞典
 ごう‐びょう ゴフビャウ【業病】
〘名〙 前世の悪業の報いによって起こるとされる、なおりにくい病気。
※高野本平家（１３Ｃ前）三「衆病をいやすと云共、豈先世の業病を治せんや」

It doesn't seem to specifically need to be incurable (which is the current entry). Also the part where all definitions say that it's due to having done bad things in a previous life is completely missing in the current definition (maybe put it in brackets). You may contract this definition but I fail to see how a single English word could do that.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>同意年齢</keb>
+<keb>業病</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>どういねんれい</reb>
+<reb>ごうびょう</reb>
@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<field>&law;</field>
-<gloss>age of consent</gloss>
+<gloss>A hard-to-cure disease said to be a retribution for bad behavior in a previous life.</gloss>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙
性的同意年齢	47
性交同意年齢	28
同意年齢	163

Split from 2087820, see discussion there.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&cloth;</field>

Split from 2816770.

シングレット	1389
リーダーズ+プラス

GG5, kokugos

Split from 1263790.

耳目を集め	7358
耳目を集める	4125
Eijiro, ルミナス

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>to attract attention and interest</gloss>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<gloss>to attract interest</gloss>
+<gloss>to capture attention</gloss>

https://kotowaza.jitenon.jp/kotowaza/6579.php

多くの人が意識を向けること。注意や関心を集めること

ベンダーロックイン	462
ベンダロックイン	115

@@ -5,0 +6,9 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ベンダロックイン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ベンダー・ロックイン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ベンダ・ロックイン</reb>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ベンダーロックイン

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<field>&chem;</field>
+<field>&biochem;</field>

医学英和辞典, ＫＯＤ追加語彙

Actually biochem.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&chem;</field>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ラミニン

G n-grams: No matches

No hits in Aozora.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>

koj, nikk

attested in a late Edo kanshi:
http://www.kangin.or.jp/learning/text/japanese/kanshi_A18_1.html

Let's make it that.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>liaison vehicle (esp. for deliveries between libraries)</gloss>
+<gloss>cooperative delivery vehicle (esp. for deliveries between libraries)</gloss>
+<gloss>liaison vehicle</gloss>

I see the word is actually in 図書館情報学用語辞典 第5版 (kotobank) with an English translation: "cooperative delivery vehicle"

京都府立図書館が運行する連絡協力車を活用した、資料の相互貸借サービスを実施しています。 (From Reverso)

GT calls it a "liaison vehicle", which is better. Seems mainly to be used in library contexts.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>co-operating car</gloss>
+<gloss>liaison vehicle (esp. for deliveries between libraries)</gloss>

協力車	883
https://www.library.pref.osaka.jp/site/central
/zeniki.html
大阪府立図書館の資料を、お近くの図書館まで協力車でお届け
します

I don't think we actually need this in the 
dictionary, but I wanted to submit it just 
because it's an interesting example of a word 
that's nigh impossible to make a sensible 
English gloss out of...!

GG5, 医学英和辞典

https://kotobank.jp/word/現実感喪失-1311394
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derealization

'

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>gods’ conference (annual gathering of gods to discuss agriculture and marriage)</gloss>
+<gloss>gods' conference (annual gathering of gods to discuss agriculture and marriage)</gloss>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>gods’ conference (annual gathering of gods to discuss agriculture and marriage )</gloss>
+<gloss>gods’ conference (annual gathering of gods to discuss agriculture and marriage)</gloss>

神議る	< 20
神議り	450

Trimming.

@@ -15,5 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>Gods’ conference</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss g_type="expl">Once-a-year gathering of gods from all of Japan in Izumo, mainly to discuss matters of man-woman relations</gloss>
+<field>&Shinto;</field>
+<gloss>gods’ conference (annual gathering of gods to discuss agriculture and marriage )</gloss>

https://amaterasu49.media/archives/17283
daijisen via kotobank

Daijirin also has 神議る[かむはかる]=神々が会議をする

テッィルトローター	No matches
チルトローター	136
ティルトローター	2061

Usually ティルトローター, which is already an entry.

https://tabiris.com/archives/ogasawara-
airport2020/

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
@@ -19,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

ガリっと	5695

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>ガリっと</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -12,2 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>with a scratch</gloss>
-<gloss>with a scrape</gloss>
+<gloss>with a scraping sound</gloss>
+<gloss>with a scratching sound</gloss>
@@ -17 +20 @@
-<gloss>with a crunchy sound (esp. eating)</gloss>
+<gloss>with a crunching sound (while eating)</gloss>

がりっと	2773
ガリッと	12046

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>がりっと</reb>
+<reb>ガリッと</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ガリッと</reb>
+<reb>がりっと</reb>
@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>with a crunchy sound</gloss>
+<gloss>with a crunchy sound (esp. eating)</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/がりっと-467909
https://kotobank.jp/jeword/ガリッ

This youtuber uses it as a verb, as ガリッた and ガリってしまった. Not sure how to represent this colloquial usage.
https://youtu.be/iQqoCE0P2Ao

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Marked as a product so "(brand name)" not needed.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Scotch® tape (brand name)</gloss>
+<gloss>Scotch® tape</gloss>

スコッチテープ	829
スコッチ・テープ	29

OK

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>1069110</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -11 +10 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&product;</misc>

http://www.beigo-n-life.com/words/trademark-used-as-generic/
https://best3.info/zatugaku/188/

I don't think スコッチテープ is used as a generic term in Japan. The sites linked above compare the use of "Scotch tape" in the US to the use of セロテープ in Japan.
I suggest moving this to the names dictionary.

Requested by 3M's lawyers (amazing, but true).

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Scotch tape (brand name)</gloss>
+<gloss>Scotch® tape (brand name)</gloss>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

Sure

@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
-<ent_seq>1923850</ent_seq>
+<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
@@ -11 +10 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&product;</misc>

G n-grams: 760

Move to names dictionary? It's not common and it's not in any of my refs.

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>スキャン・トーク</reb>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>