koj, daij, prog, etc.

点[ちょぼ] isn't marked as on-mim, so this should be consistent with that

headword (present in koj and kenkyusha's vernacular dictionary) could also be removed and changed to an 'also written as' note.  clearly 点点 usually doesn't mean this

@@ -3,0 +4,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>点々</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>点点</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +15 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -11 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -13,2 +19,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -16,0 +23,12 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>on par with</gloss>
+<gloss>as good as</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2844877">〻</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>(vertical) iteration mark used to represent repetition of the previous kanji (to be read using its kun'yomi)</gloss>

ちょぼちょぼ	35998
チョボチョボ	7916

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>チョボチョボ</reb>

GG5, etc. (JEs order it this way.)

@@ -12,4 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>checker</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
@@ -19,0 +16,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>checker</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/チェッカー

@@ -14,0 +15,6 @@
+<sense>
+<stagr>チェッカー</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>checkers (board game)</gloss>
+<gloss>draughts</gloss>
+</sense>

Probably no need to leave this open.

Reopen.

I am in the process of drafting an issue topic on expanding the number of "person" entries in JMdict, which may well lead to this entry including mention of Florence Nightingale. I'm adding and approving it as a test. I'll approve and reopen.

@@ -19 +19,6 @@
-<gloss>nightingale</gloss>
+<gloss>nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&person;</misc>
+<gloss>Nightingale, Florence (1820-1910)</gloss>

OK, but do you really think that for example Louis Pasteur (bolded), David Hilbert (bolded) are more commonly referred to in Japanese 
mainstream discourse, better known to a large amount of people, than Florence Nightingale? Or even Richard Wagner,  Moliere, Alan Turing, 
Immanuel Kant, John Locke? I'm pretty sure they're not. I think you can hit up a random 15-y-o on the street and the name they'd be the 
best-acquainted list of those + Nightingale, would be Nightingale. I actually added her name here because I heard a nurse say "ナイチンゲー
ル精神じゃないけど・・・" in a TV interview. (I think it was -精神, not 100% sure)
The Wikipedia list seems to focus on people who were the most IMPORTANT in their respective fields rather than people who are well-known 
and frequently referenced to. Maybe that's a key difference between an encyclopedia trying to assign importance to different topics, while 
a dictionary is merely trying to describe a language as it's used? I think it would make more sense to make frequency of reference rather 
than "importance" the guiding principle here.

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_articles_every_Wikipedia_should_have#Biography

We currently only have a handful of person entries in JMdict. Unless we want to significantly expand their number, I don't think Florence Nightingale quite makes the grade at this moment in time.
I note that she isn't included in the biography section of Wikipedia's "List of articles every Wikipedia should have", which could possibly serve as a guide for deciding which people should have an entry in JMdict. There are about 60 "top-priority" people on that page (marked in bold).

Fine with me.

i agree.  put it in over there

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<s_inf>also written as 喞筒</s_inf>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/義訓#明治・大正

喞筒 is not ateji (in the strict sense) as the characters are not used for their sound. Rather, ポンプ is a gikun reading of 喞筒. See the Wikipedia article above for more (mostly obsolete) gairaigo gikun examples.
I suggest adding ポンプ[gikun] to the 喞筒 entry and dropping any reference to 喞筒 from this entry. See 洋灯/ようとう/ランプ for an example of how we've handled this before.

"I don't get the rationale for using notes for the reading ..". That's not the case here. (BTW, the kanji in 喞筒 don't have the reading ポンプ.)

It wouldn't really violate the rule since this word has a different etymology. I don't get the rationale for using notes for the reading, it seems pointless since they're not parseable and well, that's exactly what the reading field is for. If the issue is low frequency, there are ways of indicating its low usage.

https://www.nikkei.com/paper/article/?b=20210601&ng=DGKKZO72457010R00C21A6EA1000
開発で後じんを拝した日本は、まずは国内で適切に使いつつ、余裕があるなら銘柄を問わずに台湾にも提供するのが基本であろう。

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>後じん</keb>

@@ -13,3 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>second fiddle</gloss>
-<gloss>second class</gloss>
-<gloss>subordinate</gloss>
+<gloss>trailing dust</gloss>
+<gloss>dust left by someone running ahead</gloss>

i think "tracked powder" was actually the only correct gloss of the bunch (as it's the only one in any of my kokugos) though it's clearly very poorly worded.  "second fiddle" etc. is limited to 後塵を拝する in the kokugos, though i'd guess that that's the only phrase it's ever really used in today

始めて	10101812
はじめて	20198630
甫めて	113
初めて	58930915
はじめて	20198630

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +19 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

OK with me.

I think there's a good case for including 
(one's) first, which also covers the original
amendment

@@ -34,0 +35 @@
+<gloss>(one's) first</gloss>

初めてが	8250
初めてを	6518

I'm OK with a noun sense. We can keep it general.
We already have adj-no on sense 1 so I don't think it's needed on the new sense.

@@ -28,0 +29,6 @@
+<gloss>not until ... do you ...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>first time</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

中休み	156367
中やすみ	345
kokugos　all mention 仕事
I heard this used to refer to the good weather 
we're experiencing in the middle of the rainy 
period, though.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>rest</gloss>
+<gloss>break (from work, etc.)</gloss>

Done. I've moved 宍; the kokugos only have it with the 肉/しし entry.

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>宍</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -15 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>肉</re_restr>
@@ -19,3 +14,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>しし</reb>
@@ -32 +24,0 @@
-<stagr>にく</stagr>
@@ -38 +29,0 @@
-<stagr>にく</stagr>
@@ -44 +34,0 @@
-<stagr>にく</stagr>
@@ -49 +38,0 @@
-<stagr>にく</stagr>
@@ -56 +44,0 @@
-<stagr>にく</stagr>

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

Added senses.
I think しし should be split out into a separate entry. The only overlap is the first two senses.

@@ -33,0 +34,6 @@
+<gloss>flesh (of a fruit)</gloss>
+<gloss>pulp</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>にく</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -34,0 +41 @@
+<gloss>flesh</gloss>
@@ -43,0 +51,7 @@
+<gloss>content</gloss>
+<gloss>substance</gloss>
+<gloss>flesh</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>にく</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

賄い付き	5246
まかない付き	98846
まかないつき	2306

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>賄い付き</keb>
+<keb>まかない付き</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>まかない付き</keb>
+<keb>賄い付き</keb>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>まかない付き</keb>

May as well. We already have a complete ケチ/けち entry, but maybe it's not a problem having both.

@@ -13,0 +14,4 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>けち</reb>
+<re_inf>&gikun;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
@@ -18 +21,0 @@
-<s_inf>also read けち</s_inf>

daij, meikyo, gg5
https://furigana.info/w/吝嗇

"miser" is wrong. Doesn't refer to a person.
Should we add けち as a gikun reading? It's relatively common in Aozora, and NHK日本語発音アクセント辞典 has "けち{吝嗇}".

@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>miser</gloss>
@@ -22 +21 @@
-<gloss>selfishness</gloss>
+<gloss>parsimony</gloss>

restoring lost xref

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2234080">ケチ・1</xref>

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<s_inf>sometimes read けち</s_inf>
+<xref type="see" seq="2234080">けち・1</xref>
+<s_inf>also read けち</s_inf>

gg5: 彼は自分の構想を肉付けするために4つの提言をした.　He offered four proposals to flesh out his concept.
を肉付けし	2867
に肉付けし	3708

Shinmeikai has it as transitive.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -22 +23 @@
-<gloss>giving substance (to)</gloss>
+<gloss>giving substance to</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +28 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

mk

glosses are maybe a little transitive?

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -25,0 +27 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, prog, daij

Splitting into senses.

@@ -20 +20,6 @@
-<gloss>fleshing out</gloss>
+<gloss>fleshing out (e.g. a plan)</gloss>
+<gloss>giving substance (to)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬───────╮
│ 生贄　　 │   150,017 │ 56.1% │
│ 生け贄　 │   115,628 │ 43.2% │
│ 生けにえ │     1,845 │  0.7% │ - sK
│ 犠牲　　 │ 2,598,762 │  N/A  │
│ いけにえ │   150,860 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴───────╯

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<keb>生けにえ</keb>
+<keb>犠牲</keb>
@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<keb>犠牲</keb>
+<keb>生けにえ</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

Seems OK. Maybe better like this.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>living sacrifice (to the gods)</gloss>
+<gloss>(living) sacrifice</gloss>

Koj: 生きたまま贄として神に供える生き物
Daijr: 神への供え物として，生きている人や獣を捧(ササ)げること。

I did wonder about this one.  You can sacrifice non-living things too.  Maybe it works this way.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>(human, animal) sacrifice (to the gods)</gloss>
+<gloss>living sacrifice (to the gods)</gloss>

I agree. It's not a literal translation of the components, but that doesn't make it an idiomatic expression per se.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&id;</misc>

gg5

I don't think id is correct. The meaning of the expression is deducible from its parts. This sense of 狭い is in all the refs.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -15 +15,3 @@
-<gloss>shallow</gloss>
+<gloss>small-minded</gloss>
+<gloss>close-minded</gloss>
+<gloss>intolerant</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

doesn't look like an adverb

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

Entry created

Add POS to proverbs
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vs-c;</pos>

Not needed for proverbs.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<pos>&vs-c;</pos>

the す is the literary form of する

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vs-c;</pos>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&proverb;</misc>

JEs use kana examples, ルミナス only has kana.

@@ -15,4 +14,0 @@
-<reb>ケチくさい</reb>
-<re_restr>ケチ臭い</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -20,2 +15,0 @@
-<re_restr>けち臭い</re_restr>
-<re_restr>吝嗇臭い</re_restr>
@@ -24,0 +19 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -31,0 +27 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -37,0 +34 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ ケチ臭い　 │  6,856 │ 21.6% │
│ けち臭い　 │  5,531 │ 17.4% │
│ 吝嗇臭い　 │     22 │  0.1% │ - rK (sankoku, smk)
│ ケチくさい │ 13,915 │ 43.8% │
│ けちくさい │  5,450 │ 17.2% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

daij, meikyo, chujiten

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>stingy</gloss>
@@ -25 +26,13 @@
-<gloss>stingy</gloss>
+<gloss>tight-fisted</gloss>
+<gloss>cheap</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>narrow-minded</gloss>
+<gloss>petty</gloss>
+<gloss>mean</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
+<gloss>shabby</gloss>
+<gloss>poor</gloss>

G n-grams:
 ケチ臭い   	6856
 けち臭い   	5531
 けちくさい	5450
 吝嗇臭い   	  22

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ケチ臭い</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,3 +13,4 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>ケチ臭い</keb>
-</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ケチくさい</reb>
+<re_restr>ケチ臭い</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +19,2 @@
+<re_restr>けち臭い</re_restr>
+<re_restr>吝嗇臭い</re_restr>

gg5, prog, daij

I don't think the 吝嗇 x-ref is needed.
Sense 4 is a noun only.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1585670">吝嗇・りんしょく</xref>
@@ -18 +16,0 @@
-<gloss>cheeseparing</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +25 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -28 +26,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -32,0 +31 @@
+<gloss>paltry</gloss>
@@ -39 +37,0 @@
-<gloss>quibbling</gloss>
@@ -40,0 +39 @@
+<gloss>small-minded</gloss>
@@ -44 +42,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -47 +45,2 @@
-<gloss>glitch</gloss>
+<gloss>misfortune</gloss>
+<gloss>jinx</gloss>

All fixed.

Jim, there are 14 けち, 4 ケチ and 1 けちな that are tagged 吝嗇

restoring lost xref

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1585670">吝嗇・りんしょく</xref>

I guess that's keeping it simple.

I don't think we need a separate sense for CD read/write speeds. It's just one format. For DVDs, Blu-rays, etc., it's a different multiple.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>double-speed (drive, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>double speed (data transfer, video playback, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>2X speed</gloss>
@@ -18,5 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>speed of CD drive, etc., in multiples of 150 KB/s</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&ctr;</pos>
-<gloss>playback speed (video, etc., as a multiple of real time)</gloss>
+<gloss>-times speed</gloss>
+<gloss>...X speed</gloss>

seems superfluous

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<s_inf>e.g. 1.25倍速</s_inf>

shinmeikai's example has it as a noun (or adj-no)
ばい そく【倍速】
〔ビデオなどで〕
通常の二倍の速さで操作が行なわれること。また、その速さ。
ex: －で再生する

eij:
倍速
double speed
倍速で
at double the speed

＿倍速
__-fold speedup

are sense 2 & 3 a counter or just a suffix?

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

倍速	457513

It appears that's the most common modern usage, despite the kanji meaning "double speed".

@@ -18,0 +19,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&ctr;</pos>
+<s_inf>e.g. 1.25倍速</s_inf>
+<gloss>playback speed (video, etc., as a multiple of real time)</gloss>

G n-grams:
けちのつき始め	175
ケチのつき始め	1170

I don't think this is needed. A+B.

Entry created

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
焼き蛤	6413
焼きはまぐり	3871
焼きハマグリ	6419
焼き文蛤	No matches
焼き蚌	No matches
焼蛤	3508
焼はまぐり	4920
焼ハマグリ	860
焼文蛤	No matches
焼蚌	No matches

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>焼きハマグリ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,12 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼はまぐり</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼きはまぐり</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼蛤</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>焼ハマグリ</keb>
@@ -8,0 +24,9 @@
+<re_restr>焼き蛤</re_restr>
+<re_restr>焼はまぐり</re_restr>
+<re_restr>焼きはまぐり</re_restr>
+<re_restr>焼蛤</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>やきハマグリ</reb>
+<re_restr>焼きハマグリ</re_restr>
+<re_restr>焼ハマグリ</re_restr>

GG5, 新和英中辞典, etc.

@@ -13,0 +13,1 @@
+<gloss>baked clam</gloss>

daijs

http://www.coelang.tufs.ac.jp/mt/en/gmod/contents/explanation/037.html
https://3040english.info/okay/
https://tap-biz.jp/business/honorific/1041475

Nevertheless, it's very common and appears in a lot of instructional/explanatory material, I think it's very much the sort of thing beginners would look up.
I've attempted a tweak of the glosses.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>alright to do</gloss>
+<gloss>can do</gloss>
@@ -14 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>can do</gloss>

This is just てもいい with する. Do we need it? Also, the idea of permission/concession isn't clearly conveyed by these glosses.

してもよい	336956
してもいい	1506832

中辞典

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<reb>してもよい</reb>
+<reb>してもいい</reb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>してもいい</reb>
+<reb>してもよい</reb>

Yes.

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>してもいい</reb>

add してもいい?

Quiet for a while. May as well close it.

現在に至る	514710
現在に至ります	44228
現在に至った	6962
現在に至りました	2232
現在に至って	178577
現在に至っている	64730
現在に至るまで	143385

This was discussed at length 3 years ago in entry 2759290.
I agree that it's often used in an inflected form, although it seems the prenominal use is in the majority. Perhaps two senses?

@@ -14,0 +15,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&v5r;</pos>
+<gloss>to arrive at the present day</gloss>

Wasn't it better to have this glossed as a verb? It often appears as such. Example from a 1938 business directory:
千代治助氏骨牌商開店、次デ明治三十五年木櫛兼業、大正二十年頃ヨリ現業ニ擴張シタ承シ現在ニ至ル。

See 2759290.

@@ -13,3 +13,2 @@
-<pos>&v5r;</pos>
-<gloss>to arrive at the present</gloss>
-<gloss>to the present day</gloss>
+<gloss>arriving at the present</gloss>
+<gloss>present-day</gloss>

GG5

GG5 has 6 examples, of which two are 現在に至るまで. I think it's worth having.

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
@@ -14,0 +15,1 @@
+<gloss>to the present day</gloss>

後塵を拝する	6277
後じんを拝する	27

https://www.nikkei.com/paper/article/?b=20210601&ng=DGKKZO72457010R00C21A6EA1000
開発で後じんを拝した日本は、まずは国内で適切に使いつつ、余裕があるなら銘柄を問わずに台湾にも提供するのが基本であろう。

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>後じんを拝する</keb>

gg5, prog, daij, koj

The kokugos have 2 senses.

@@ -13 +13,9 @@
-<gloss>to be left in the dust of</gloss>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>to be left in the dust (of)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be outdone (by)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&vs-s;</pos>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>to be subordinate (to)</gloss>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

@@ -12,3 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>be left in the dust of</gloss>
-<gloss>play second fiddle to</gloss>
-<gloss>take second billing to</gloss>
+<pos>&vs-s;</pos>
+<gloss>to be left in the dust of</gloss>
+<gloss>to play second fiddle (to)</gloss>
+<gloss>to take second billing (to)</gloss>

賄い料理	7370
まかない料理	26325
まかないりょうり	63

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>賄い料理</keb>
+<keb>まかない料理</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>まかない料理</keb>
+<keb>賄い料理</keb>

GG5

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>staff meals</gloss>

大辞林, 大辞泉

gg5

I can't see why this wouldn't be glossed as a verb.

@@ -24,3 +24,5 @@
-<gloss>have a jinx on</gloss>
-<gloss>bring bad luck</gloss>
-<gloss>get off to a bad start</gloss>
+<gloss>to be jinxed</gloss>
+<gloss>to suffer a stroke of bad luck</gloss>
+<gloss>to suffer a setback</gloss>
+<gloss>to have a damper put on one</gloss>
+<gloss>to have cold water thrown on one</gloss>

けちが付く	73
ケチが付く	611
けちがつく	272
ケチがつく	1952
中辞典, ルミナス

It's not a verb.

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>ケチが付く</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -7,3 +10,4 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>ケチが付く</keb>
-</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ケチがつく</reb>
+<re_restr>ケチが付く</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11,0 +16 @@
+<re_restr>けちが付く</re_restr>
@@ -16,3 +21,5 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<gloss>to have a jinx on</gloss>
-<gloss>to bring bad luck</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2234080">ケチ・4</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>have a jinx on</gloss>
+<gloss>bring bad luck</gloss>
+<gloss>get off to a bad start</gloss>

digital daijisen
https://kotobank
.jp/word/%E3%81%
91%E3%81%A1%E3%8
1%8C%E4%BB%98%E3
%81%8F-490237
kenkyuusha
https://ejje.web
lio.jp/content/%
E3%81%91%E3%81%A
1%E3%81%8C%E3%81
%A4%E3%81%8F

Not really. To a degree, many abbreviations are a bit colloquial.

col?

小ブル	973	 
小ブル的	214	
小ブル急進	198
小ブル急進主義	191
小ブル性	51

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

https://kotobank.jp/word/脱炭素化-1996657

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

https://kotobank.jp/word/脱炭素-1996656

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

https://kotobank.jp/word/低炭素化-1996731

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

https://kotobank.jp/word/低炭素社会-184956

Koj, Daijr, Reverso

https://kotobank.jp/word/塩浴炉-448290
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/塩浴炉

電力取引市場	574

A bit ABC but I think it's OK.

https://kotobank.jp/word/電力取引市場-182438

https://www.godictionary.net/term/danten.html
断点	986

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>cutting point (go)</gloss>
+<field>&go;</field>
+<gloss>cutting point</gloss>

https://senseis.xmp.net/?Cutting

basic go term

I did poke around a bit before approving it, and it seemed there were enough "real" hits to justify its inclusion. Like a lot of expressions, it's hard to find uses in identifiable contexts.

Is this used in Japanese? 
The counts for "サランヘヨあなた" presumably come from "サランヘヨ あなたに逢いたくて", which is the Japanese title of a Korean film.

サランヘヨ	14813	  
サランヘ	3759	  
サランヘヤ	1704	  
サランヘ	1036	  
サランヘヨあなた	843	  
サランヘヨあなたに	835

https://www.konest.com/contents/todays_korean.html?id=17593
사랑해요(サランヘヨ)=「愛してる、愛してます」

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

https://kotobank.jp/word/グリホサート-486290

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2819780">デジタルサイネージ</xref>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙

https://led.led-tokyo.co.jp/news/digitalsignagevsbillboard/

電子看板とは、ledビジョンなどの電子媒体を用いて情報を表示する看板を指します。

GG5: ～の Franco-[French-]German.

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/pickup/6394877
https://kotobank.jp/gs/?q=仏独

仏独	18645
仏独の	2581
Styled after 日米.

daijs: 1. 人のからだの肉。
       2. 猪（いのしし）・鹿（しか）などの食用肉。
koj: にく。特に、食用の獣肉。

The refs have a "人体の肉" sense. I think this works.

@@ -15,5 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1463520">肉・にく・1</xref>
-<gloss>flesh (of an animal)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>flesh (esp. of an animal)</gloss>

GG5, etc, Koj, Daijr, etc.

Splitting from 1463520.

9 days and no real support. I'll delete it so it can be revived; unlike a dead fish.

マグロは止まると死ぬ	40
マグロは止まると	108
鮪は止まると	< 20
まぐろは止まると	< 20

Yes, the (relatively few) pages mentioning it are all about the fish. Unless someone can provide a proper reference or two, I'll drop it.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>マグロは止まると死ぬ</reb>
+<reb>マグロはとまるとしぬ</reb>

no ref provided.  a google search brings up the obvious literal translations but i don't see any for the figurative meaning

I think this lingered long enough.

試し斬り	15326
置き藁	< 20

I'm never the one to knock back entries, but I feel this one is really too obscure. It only gets a handful of WWW hits and most of those are false positives. I think it can be rejected.

http://mugaikai.org/
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xXCZ34m4eBQ
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EXK_kEzHm-E

I wasn't familiar with this term.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>passive house</gloss>
+<gloss>passive house (ultra-low energy building standard)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_house
パッシブハウス	739

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>パッシブ・ハウス</reb>

wiki

Not super-common, but fairly widespread and definitely jokey. I'd let it in.

遅いランナー	756
スローランナー	634
亀ランナー	232

I agree this might not be all that well-established, but it's still sees 1:3 of the usage of more obvious and literal expressions meaning 
the same thing. Compare "turtle runner" and "slow runner" in the English (2019) corpus on Google Books ngrams and you'll find that "turtle 
runner" doesn't even appear in the graph: "Ngrams not found". This means the "slow runner":"turtle runner" ratio in English is at most 
1:600, but as it doesn't appear any single year, it's likely much much more skewed towards "slow runner". 
Still, it's not the fact that the expression is NEVER used in English, I found this for example on twitter: 
https://twitter.com/DanielleONeil_/status/1324518213468770305
"Coming from a turtle runner - that pace is amazing!!" Nov 6, 2020 
↑ this English usage does look like it might a "on-the-fly creation" but I think the relative frequency of the construction in Japanese is 
evidence it is at least something of an established expression. I don't think mere coincidence can account for a 1:3 vs ＞1:600 
discrepancy.

Is this an established term or more of an on-the-fly creation? The low number of hits on Google and Twitter suggests to me that it's the latter, and is therefore not needed as an entry. I can imagine someone saying "亀ランナー" without ever having heard it before.

亀ランナー	232
friend's social media post on taking up 
running again: 少しずつ走る感覚が戻ってきてる気がす
る。相変わらず亀ランナーだけど…
twitter: 2 tweets past week.
"朝の10キロで久しぶりに月間100キロ達成。ようやっとる。
自分で積み上げたものしか信じられないと思ってるので(チャ
ントをパクるな)、ヘタレ亀ランナーらしくコツコツ積み上げ
ていきます。"
"私は亀ランナーなので
区間賞なんて全く狙ってません"
"わしが1番スピードから離れてしまってる亀ランナーになって
るわ"

Not all that common