Better. Thanks.

gg5, prog

I think this is clearer.

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>to impose (a tax, fine, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -18,4 +19,3 @@
-<gloss>to charge</gloss>
-<gloss>to assess</gloss>
-<gloss>to assign (e.g. task)</gloss>
-<gloss>to impose</gloss>
+<gloss>to assign (a task, duty, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to give</gloss>
+<gloss>to set</gloss>

GG5, etc.

I don't think it has that impression, but a little tweak may help.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>to assign (e.g. task)</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>to assign</gloss>

大辞林

This is used for non-taxes too, like 重要な任務を課する
Currently it sounds like the verb is only used for taxes and fees.

'to tax' seems dodgy for '税を課する'.  'to impose a tax' = okay.  'to tax a tax' = strange

@@ -16,1 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>to impose</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>to levy</gloss>
@@ -19,2 +20,1 @@
-<gloss>to tax</gloss>
-<gloss>to levy</gloss>
+<gloss>to impose</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
子馬	43019
仔馬	31191
小馬	13248
子ウマ	1002 // form I just saw
こウマ	78

other forms, if someone wants to add em
仔ウマ	45
小ウマ	No matches

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<keb>仔馬</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -11 +14 @@
-<keb>仔馬</keb>
+<keb>子ウマ</keb>
@@ -14,0 +18,7 @@
+<re_restr>子馬</re_restr>
+<re_restr>仔馬</re_restr>
+<re_restr>小馬</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>こウマ</reb>
+<re_restr>子ウマ</re_restr>

KOD

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>time basis</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=時間軸
https://www.weblio.jp/content/時間軸

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>timeline</gloss>

始めて	10101812
はじめて	20198630
甫めて	113
初めて	58930915
はじめて	20198630

@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +19 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

OK with me.

I think there's a good case for including 
(one's) first, which also covers the original
amendment

@@ -34,0 +35 @@
+<gloss>(one's) first</gloss>

初めてが	8250
初めてを	6518

I'm OK with a noun sense. We can keep it general.
We already have adj-no on sense 1 so I don't think it's needed on the new sense.

@@ -28,0 +29,6 @@
+<gloss>not until ... do you ...</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>first time</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

wisdom; genius

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>passing</gloss>

daijr koj

mark [hon] – this is 尊敬語
(Just saw on TV referring to death of imperial prince)

@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<misc>&hon;</misc>

daijr, gg5, prog

〘感〙in the kokugos.
I think the glosses are better with exclamation marks.

@@ -11,4 +11,6 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<gloss>I've got it</gloss>
-<gloss>all right</gloss>
-<gloss>fine</gloss>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>I've got it!</gloss>
+<gloss>I've done it!</gloss>
+<gloss>that's it!</gloss>
+<gloss>bingo!</gloss>

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

しゃ

The kokugos (apart from Nikk) only have 占者/せんしゃ. I think that should lead.

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<reb>うらないしゃ</reb>
+<reb>せんしゃ</reb>
+<re_restr>占者</re_restr>
@@ -18,2 +19 @@
-<reb>せんしゃ</reb>
-<re_restr>占者</re_restr>
+<reb>うらないしゃ</reb>

占い師	1701994	97.9%
占師	27819	1.6%

占者	8292	0.5%
占い者	903	0.1%


Main dictionary with the picture & everything is under うらないしゃ. Second defn is  せん‐しゃ【占者】, 〘名〙 (「せんじゃ」とも)
https://kotobank.jp/word/占者-550066
精選版 日本国語大辞典 「占者」の意味・読み・例文・類語
うらない‐しゃ うらなひ‥【占者】

Example of  占者 = うらないしゃ
https://japanknowledge.com/articles/hmrkns/kns004.html   (as furigana on a definiton)
https://9rakugo-fan.seesaa.net/article/201808article_2.html  今回採り上げるのは易者（占者うらないしゃ）である。
占者 = せんじゃ
https://sarumeigaku.com/sarukoblog/archives/18544
https://namboku.jp/?page_id=266   その本数によって占者（せんじゃ）

占者 doesn't even have せんしゃ or せんじゃ (few examples though)
https://furigana.info/w/占者
うらないしゃ	33.3%
うらなひしや	33.3%
うらない	26.7%
せんせい	6.7%


yourei examples of 占い者 (plentiful, 53 examples)
https://yourei.jp/占い者

yourei for 占者(90 examples). rare furigana, but where it appears, it's about 2-to-1 for うらないしゃ over せんじゃ.  せんしゃ never appears.
https://yourei.jp/占者

Can't speak to historical usage, but modern use seems to clearly prefer せんじゃ over せんしゃ (the latter being nonexistent, even though the old kokugos seem to feel differently). 

うらないしゃ needs the full 占い者 form.  It really feels like うらないしゃ should come first as a reading, even though daijs doesn't give it explicitly.  This is probably one of those [col]/[form] kunyomi/onyomi splits we've put into one entry.

Just searching for "占者" alone, this is what I encountered(せんじゃ):

Manga called 占者高生 星見先輩． Reading: せんじゃこうせい ほしみせんぱい
https://mangapedia.com/占者高生星見先輩-qbkwratb9

Fortune-teller playing card:
未来占者　＝ みらいせんじゃ
https://www.cardrush.jp/product/51747
Another:
探検隊の占者 たんけんたいのせんじゃ
https://mtg-jp.com/products/card-gallery/0000192/491685/

うらないじゃ(ja) was noted previously as only in nikk.  That would be a very unusual pronunciation (there are 0 other occurrences of verb-form-い者 as じゃ, and only a few nouns that end in いじゃ.  At best, most likely archaic.  For me, this falls into the "more harm than good" category to be visible.　There might be some book results from the 1800s, or I'd just drop it entirely.

Windows 11 IME cannot complete any of these but うらないしゃ.

ngram counts for furigana forms are useless for determining frequency, because せんしゃ and せんじゃ have more common, unrelated uses (戦車, 選者). The terms are too rare to search ngrams with disambiguating collocations.

@@ -7,6 +7,3 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>せんしゃ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>せんじゃ</reb>
-</r_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>占い者</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +14,8 @@
+<reb>せんじゃ</reb>
+<re_restr>占者</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>せんしゃ</reb>
+<re_restr>占者</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +23 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
@@ -20,0 +27 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1588460">占い師</xref>

I think "palmist" is too specific.

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>fortune teller</gloss>
@@ -22 +22,0 @@
-<gloss>fortuneteller</gloss>
@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>palmist</gloss>

Interesting.

まばら	331229
疎ら	32753
疏ら	152
まばらに	68333
疎らに	8440
疏らに	No matches

@@ -6 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
@@ -9,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

daij, meikyo

Not a noun.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
疎ら	32753
疏ら	152 // デジタル大辞泉、明鏡

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>疏ら</keb>

ngrams

https://oshiete.goo.ne.jp/qa/13258730.html

@@ -18,0 +19,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>だーめ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/囲碁
Wikipedia uses the kanji form for the go term, so it might be fine without a [uk] tag.

Adding a [uk] tag to sense 05.

@@ -53,0 +54 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Let it go.

@@ -50,0 +51,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<gloss>no!</gloss>
+<gloss>stop!</gloss>

(I do feel an int sense, like I suggested previously, would be helpful)

gg5, daijr

Not just grades.

@@ -20,2 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>barely scraping by in school</gloss>
-<gloss>having poor grades</gloss>
+<gloss>having consistently poor results (grades, sales, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>barely scraping by</gloss>
+<gloss>being on the verge of failing</gloss>

GG5, etc.

大辞泉

@@ -17,0 +18,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>barely scraping by in school</gloss>
+<gloss>having poor grades</gloss>
+</sense>

How does this look? sort of how 内地 is split
Seeing 内地人 several times in ref to Japanese people in 1951 book.

@@ -12,3 +12 @@
-<gloss>people living in the country</gloss>
-<gloss>people living inland</gloss>
-<gloss>Japanese in Japan proper</gloss>
+<s_inf>used by people in Hokkaido and Okinawa</s_inf>
@@ -15,0 +14,6 @@
+<gloss>mainland Japanese</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&obs;</misc>
+<gloss>Japanese people (as opposed to the people of the colonies of the Empire of Japan)</gloss>

新和英大辞典

Looks good to me.

gg5

@@ -12,0 +12,2 @@
+<gloss>people living in the country</gloss>
+<gloss>people living inland</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +15,1 @@
+<gloss>people living on Honshu</gloss>

豚に真珠	18786
猫に小判	33149

We do usually include lit glosses for idiomatic expressions like this (where the imagery is different from that of the equivalent English expression).
I think the x-ref is fine. We could also add an x-ref to 豚に真珠 pointing here.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1457400">豚に真珠・ぶたにしんじゅ</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1457400">豚に真珠</xref>
@@ -22,2 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>pearls cast before swine</gloss>
-<gloss>great waste</gloss>
+<gloss>casting pearls before swine</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">(giving) a gold coin to a cat</gloss>

It's case-by-case but we'd usually include a literal version if the expression is also used with that meaning. In this case, it doesn't seem to happen. The xref is possibly useful to indicate that there's an alternative equivalent expression.

Is there a rule for which idioms should have 
literal translations and which shouldn't, 
then? Because deciding it's "no use" here 
seems rather arbitrary to me.
this is more common than 豚に真珠 so I don't 
think the xref is helpful.

I don't think an xref to 小判 or the literal translation is much use.
ルミナス xrefs to 豚に真珠; maybe that's better.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1348670">小判・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1457400">豚に真珠・ぶたにしんじゅ</xref>
@@ -24 +23,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">(giving a) gold coin to a cat</gloss>

GG5: throb (with pain); twinge.
中辞典: (1) ache; smart; tingle; throb (with pain)  (2) gall; rile; rankle; fester
ルミナス: は全身が*うずいた His whole body ached.  傷がまた*うずきはじめた The cut started to smart again.

The perils of reference-free amendments.

@@ -14 +14,12 @@
-<gloss>to ache (to do something)</gloss>
+<gloss>to throb (with pain)</gloss>
+<gloss>to ache</gloss>
+<gloss>to smart</gloss>
+<gloss>to twinge</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to rankle</gloss>
+<gloss>to gall</gloss>
+<gloss>to rile</gloss>

@@ -14,2 +14 @@
-<gloss>to throb</gloss>
-<gloss>to ache</gloss>
+<gloss>to ache (to do something)</gloss>

Nikk has 巻き着ける (33).

大辞林、デジタル大辞泉

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
巻きつける	50322
巻き付ける	32013
巻付ける	718
巻つける	80 // form I found it in https://i.imgur.com/UyGMLh7.png

日国 also has 着 as a substitution for 付, if someone thinks that is worth adding

@@ -8,0 +9,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>巻付ける</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>巻つける</keb>

djr; djs; 新和英中辞典

@@ -16 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>to wreathe (e.g. rope)</gloss>
+<gloss>to wind around</gloss>
+<gloss>to wrap around</gloss>
+<gloss>to coil around</gloss>

回し飲み	12307
まわし飲み	1087
まわしのみ	703
廻し飲み	440
GG5, etc.

The kokugos use 器.

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>廻し飲み</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -16 +19 @@
-<gloss>drinking in turn from one cup or bottle</gloss>
+<gloss>drinking in turn from one vessel (cup, glass, etc.)</gloss>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>まわし飲み</keb>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>drinking in turn from one cup</gloss>
+<gloss>drinking in turn from one cup or bottle</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

Added sense.

@@ -24 +24,11 @@
-<gloss>to impersonate</gloss>
+<gloss>to (successfully) impersonate</gloss>
+<gloss>to pretend to be</gloss>
+<gloss>to pass oneself off as</gloss>
+<gloss>to disguise oneself as</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to (completely) become</gloss>
+<gloss>to (fully) turn into</gloss>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
成りすます	12038
成り済ます	1598
なり済ます	117
成済ます	45 // 大辞林、デジタル大辞泉、新明解、岩国
なりすます	20482

@@ -8,0 +9,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>なり済ます</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>成済ます</keb>

Quiet. Closing.

幾人	86456
幾人が	818
幾人を	172

Now that we have scrubbed-up entries for 幾人か, 幾人も and 幾人でも this gloss is probably the best one, but is it really a noun? The n-gram counts are not indicating much noun-like syntax, and Unidic doesn't have it as a bound morpheme. Maybe "exp" works in this case.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

gg5, daijr/s

Only means "number of people"/"some people" as 幾人か.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>number of people</gloss>
+<gloss>how many people</gloss>

いく人 gets the higher n-gram count, but I think it's coming from passages of the ...ていく人 variety.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>いく人</keb>

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/purple laver
https://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1463
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porphyra#Species
"Following a major reassessment of the genus in 2011, many species previously included in Porphyra have been transferred to Pyropia, for example Pyropia tenera, ..."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyropia_tenera

I can't find another source that has "purple laver" as a common name for this particular species, only other species. I think the original gloss was better. 
Now part of the Pyropia genus.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>purple laver (Porphyra tenera)</gloss>
+<gloss>Pyropia tenera (species of edible seaweed)</gloss>

GG5, ルミナス

And more our usual style.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<gloss>Porphyra tenera (species of edible seaweed)</gloss>
+<gloss>purple laver (Porphyra tenera)</gloss>

GG5

https://eow.alc.co.jp/

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>formulation</gloss>

GG5, etc.

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=家族構成

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>family composition</gloss>
+<gloss>family makeup</gloss>

ペロッと	70939	  
gg5, daij, koj

Aligning with ぺろり. I think ぺろりと can be dropped. We have adv-to on ぺろり.

@@ -4,6 +3,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ペロリと</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ぺろりと</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -14 +8 @@
-<reb>ペロっと</reb>
+<reb>ペロッと</reb>
@@ -17 +11 @@
-<reb>ペロりと</reb>
+<reb>ペロっと</reb>
@@ -21 +14,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2641370">ぺろり・1</xref>
@@ -23 +16,20 @@
-<gloss>while sticking out one's tongue</gloss>
+<gloss>(eating up) quickly</gloss>
+<gloss>in no time</gloss>
+<gloss>gobbling up</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>quickly (sticking out one's tongue)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>licking</gloss>
+<gloss>licking up</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
+<gloss>(peeling off) in one go</gloss>
+<gloss>completely</gloss>

ぺろりと	69285
ぺろっと	45765
ペロりと	428
ペロリと	120928
ペロっと	30645

As has been done with ペロリ/ぺろり.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ペロリと</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,6 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ペロっと</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ペロりと</reb>

Daij, 新和英中辞典, ルミナス和英辞典

Could be merged with the (new) ぺろり entry, but ぺろっと is a problem.

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ぺろっと</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9,0 +12,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2641370">ぺろり</xref>

Yes, I guess I can't see too many redeeming aspects of this one.

I don't think this should be an entry. It's just 古武士 + 然, and it's not even a common example. Not in any of the refs.
Not sure why it was on a 四字熟語 list.

古武士然	323	  
古武士然と	280	  
古武士然とし	275	  
古武士然とした	260	  
古武士然とした立ち居	92	  
古武士然とした風貌	29	  
古武士然として	22

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-t;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<field>&sports;</field>
+<field>&golf;</field>
@@ -30 +30 @@
-<gloss>gross score (in golf)</gloss>
+<gloss>gross score</gloss>

Candidate for the "hidden" tag.

Better to include as an rK, probably? this gives dictionary apps etc. a choice to hide it away/make it much less prominent than a note ends up being

@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>哥</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12 +16 @@
-<s_inf>occ. 哥</s_inf>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -16,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -22,0 +28,2 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

At most a note.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<s_inf>occ. 哥</s_inf>

saw this written as 哥 (with rubi) in a 1951 book published by Kyoto city... 
in nikk's example sentence also: ※日本の下層社会（1899）〈横山源之助〉三「即ち明治二十八年の総輸出額千六百九十一万四千二十七哥(グロス)にして」

哥[ateji][oK] in the kanji field? just a note?

Makes me feel tired.

@@ -41,0 +42 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

〈鴨／かも／カモ〉が〈葱／ねぎ／ネギ〉を〈背負／しょ〉って〈来／く〉る
Maybe displaying one form which has all the kanji is enough (鴨が葱を背負って来る).
I'm hiding the other 7 kanji forms and dropping all the other readings.

@@ -4,15 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>カモがネギを背負ってくる</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>カモがネギを背負って来る</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>鴨がねぎを背負ってくる</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>鴨がねぎを背負って来る</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>鴨が葱を背負ってくる</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -22,0 +8,20 @@
+<keb>カモがネギを背負ってくる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>カモがネギを背負って来る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鴨がねぎを背負ってくる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鴨がねぎを背負って来る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鴨が葱を背負ってくる</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -23,0 +29 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -26,0 +33 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -29,5 +35,0 @@
-<reb>カモがねぎをしょってくる</reb>
-<re_restr>カモがネギを背負ってくる</re_restr>
-<re_restr>カモがネギを背負って来る</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -35,6 +36,0 @@
-<re_restr>鴨がねぎを背負ってくる</re_restr>
-<re_restr>鴨がねぎを背負って来る</re_restr>
-<re_restr>鴨が葱を背負ってくる</re_restr>
-<re_restr>鴨が葱を背負って来る</re_restr>
-<re_restr>鴨が葱をしょって来る</re_restr>
-<re_restr>鴨が葱をしょってくる</re_restr>

カモが葱を背負って	25
鴨鴨がネギを背負って	441

Could add these forme too, but it makes me feel tired.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CPDjZ37p_OJ/

@@ -24,0 +25,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鴨が葱をしょってくる</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -36,0 +40 @@
+<re_restr>鴨が葱をしょってくる</re_restr>

@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+<field>&food;</field>
@@ -25 +26 @@
-<gloss>tofu-like dish made with ground sesame paste</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">tofu-like dish made with ground sesame paste</gloss>

https://justhungry.com/goma-dofu-sesame-tofu-not-tofu  etc,

I think this works better.

@@ -24 +24,2 @@
-<gloss>crushed sesame seeds boiled in water and chilled like tofu</gloss>
+<gloss>goma tofu</gloss>
+<gloss>tofu-like dish made with ground sesame paste</gloss>

Entry created

I guess it's not a great loss.

Not just a computing term but I don't think we need this. A+B and uncommon.

空白化	709	  
空白化し	211	  
空白化して	106	  
空白化を	70	  
空白化が	65	  
空白化する	54

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>

Entry created

gg5, wiki

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>rhodophyte</gloss>
+<gloss>Rhodophyta</gloss>

GG5, 医学英和辞典

A bit more meaningful.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>red algae</gloss>

Entry created

Curious.

デジタル大辞泉

@@ -17,0 +18,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1570780">肛門</xref>
+<gloss>anus</gloss>

Resubmit.

@@ -18,6 +17,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&col;</misc>
-<gloss>butt-hole</gloss>
-<gloss>anus</gloss>

Reference, please!

@@ -17,0 +18,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<misc>&col;</misc>
+<gloss>butt-hole</gloss>
+<gloss>anus</gloss>

See comments on deleted 2855609.

@@ -8,0 +9,6 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ペロン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ぺろん</reb>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
@@ -19,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
@@ -24,0 +27 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
@@ -30,0 +34 @@
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

gg5, prog, daij
ぺろりと	69285
ペロリと	120928

Added senses.
Used the n-grams to come up with the order.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ペロリ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,3 +11,22 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="2009690">ぺろりと</xref>
-<gloss>(act of) licking</gloss>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<gloss>(eating up) quickly</gloss>
+<gloss>in no time</gloss>
+<gloss>gobbling up</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<gloss>quickly (sticking out one's tongue)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<gloss>licking</gloss>
+<gloss>licking up</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<gloss>(peeling off) in one go</gloss>
+<gloss>completely</gloss>

Daij,

Could be merged with 2009690.

@@ -9,2 +9,3 @@
-<gloss>licking</gloss>
-<gloss>act of licking</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2009690">ぺろりと</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2009690">ぺろりと</xref>
+<gloss>(act of) licking</gloss>

OK. Let it go.

幾種類	11217	  
幾種類も	5916	  
幾種類か	4464

I don't think this entry is actually helpful. It's almost always followed by も (in which case it means "many varieties") or か (in which case it means "several varieties").

幾種類	11217
いく種類	2090

Marginal, but I'd keep it. The いく種類 version may stump some people.

I don't think this is needed. 幾 can be used with many different words.

not sure it's necessary.  but 750k hits, so possibly

@@ -7,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>いく種類</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,2 +14,3 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>several kinds of, several varieties of</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>several kinds of</gloss>
+<gloss>several varieties of</gloss>

Quiet. Closing.

The  Philippines foreign minister tweeted “Hey China, fuck off!” recently, and Sankei reported this with the headline 「中国よ、消えうせやがれ」. 
Maybe it's time to revisit our 2014 decision not to include that gloss?

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>fuck off</gloss>

"gg5 does have" -> "eij does have"

wisdom waei, gg5, prog, eij

splitting out of 消え失せる. the gloss there was 'fuck off', which gg5 does have, but that seems a bit too harsh

I don't think they are used as verbs now. GG5 has an entry for 憂う/うれう, which it points to 憂える and only has examples using 憂うべき, which we have as an entry. With a POS like that, I think it's safer to keep the "arch".

Are 憂う/愁う really archaic? They're in meikyo/shinmeikai, which call them a literary form of 憂える.

not sure how to handle it.  usually they don't include both the う and the ふ as headwords for these.  the entry itself suggests that it is v2h regardless of う vs ふ, so it's probably okay to put them in here

@@ -8,0 +9,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>憂う</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>愁う</keb>

Daijr

I think this is how we'd handle it. Should there be 憂う, etc. as well? Daijr has 憂ふ as the headword, but it's indexed on 憂う too.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>憂う</keb>
+<keb>憂ふ</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>愁う</keb>
+<keb>愁ふ</keb>
@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>うりょう</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -14,2 +17,14 @@
-<pos>&v5u;</pos>
-<gloss>to worry, to be concerned (especially about the near future or about the fate of something)</gloss>
+<pos>&v2h-k;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2036290">憂うべき・うれうべき</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>to worry</gloss>
+<gloss>to be concerned</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v2h-s;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1588580">憂える・うれえる</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>to grieve</gloss>
+<gloss>to lament</gloss>
+<gloss>to be anxious</gloss>
+<gloss>to be distressed</gloss>

http://www.weblio.jp/content/憂う

憂ふ and 愁ふ seem to be archaic versions.

OK, passing for now.

I'm not sure I got this part entirely right.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>to grow older (esp. older than one looks, or older than other people in the same group or situation)</gloss>
+<gloss>to grow older (esp. older than other people in the same group or situation)</gloss>

I think that's missing the point?

https://i.imgur.com/6NtOI63.jpg
Here two young men are talking about hitting on a 30+ woman.
年喰ってる方が夢見がちって言うしな。こわいよな。
The implication is not that 30+ is old, but that 30+ is old FOR a singlewoman.
This is the same logic that goes for the 三省堂慣用句辞典 quote.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>to grow older (esp. to an advanced age)</gloss>
+<gloss>to grow older (esp. older than one looks, or older than other people in the same group or situation)</gloss>

Not sure it's needed.

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>to grow older (esp. in contrast to what one would expect)</gloss>
+<gloss>to grow older (esp. to an advanced age)</gloss>

大辞林
三省堂慣用句辞典: 予想されるよりも年を取っている。また、他と比べた際に、それよりも年を取っている。「彼は大学新卒にしては、ずいぶん年を食っているね」

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>to grow older</gloss>
+<gloss>to grow older (esp. in contrast to what one would expect)</gloss>

I think it probably should be merged. GG5 just had イケイケ with its "go-go" meaning, then added 行け行け in its "connecting; separating" sense. 
I'll set up a merge. This can be deleted if that's approved.

Shouldn't this be merged with 2656760? I think they're the same word.

GG5: 〔慎重さを欠いた積極性･抑制のきかない奔放性〕  and glossed as "go-go".

I don't think that makes a food case for the proposed changes. Better the way it was.

@@ -10 +10,3 @@
-<gloss>gaudily dressed and assertive</gloss>
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
+<gloss>fashionably clothed and assertive (esp. a woman)</gloss>
+<gloss>go-go</gloss>

i (male) was called イケイケ外人 by a friend of 
a friend when i wore sunglasses, 15 years ago. 
young people might not use it but people in 
their 30s probably do

@@ -10,2 +10 @@
-<misc>&dated;</misc>
-<gloss>(of a woman) fashionably clothed and sexually assertive</gloss>
+<gloss>gaudily dressed and assertive</gloss>

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

No response. I'm dropping the vi for now.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -26 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -35 +32,0 @@
-<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -25,0 +27 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -34,0 +37 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

It's more colloquial use of the term rather than slang per se.

@@ -33 +33 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc>

https://kotowaka.com/internet/ofuse/
https://numan.tokyo/words/cIvnX

@@ -29,0 +30,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<gloss>financially supporting one's favorite celebrity (by buying merchandise, attending events, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>

ラインオーバー	2711
センターラインオーバー	1080
センターライン	78603

I really can't make a coherent entry for this. Closing.

ラインオーバー	2711

Not in references, WWW pages and images all over the place - clothing, eye-makeup, etc.  This needs a proper treatment with references for the meaning. ("over the line" is not a noun.)

https://www.ntv.co.jp/3min/recipe/20160815
https://macaro-ni.jp/88516?page=2

The recipes that Jim and I posted below both contain 絹ごし豆腐/silken tofu as an ingredient but others (like the ones above) don't.
Edamame are just green soybeans so maybe that's enough for 枝豆豆腐 to be considered "tofu", but I take Jim's point about the lack of curdling. "Tofu-like" is probably more accurate.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>tofu made with crushed edamame</gloss>
+<gloss>tofu-like dish made with edamame</gloss>

the quote from 世界大百科事典 that Nicolas posted seems to say it's made just from edamame (so more like gomadofu, no real tofu).
"枝豆だけでつくる枝豆豆腐は色も美しく味もよい。"

I put "tofu-like" because AFAIK it doesn't go through the coagulation/curding process that regular tofu production uses. I'm not that fussed, really.

https://www.ajinomoto.co.jp/foodservice/recipepro/detail.aspx?recipe=24725

Can we really call it "tofu-like" when it *is* tofu?
Does this work?

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<gloss>edamame tofu</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">tofu-like dish made with cooked crushed edamame</gloss>
+<gloss>tofu made with crushed edamame</gloss>

Nikk

https://kotobank.jp/word/鶏蛋-2033722

鶏蛋	1046

ひね漬け	146
古漬け	17641

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>well-pickled (vegetables, etc.)</gloss>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<gloss>well-pickled vegetables</gloss>

https://gerostyle.jp/tanoshimu/kurasu/cookpadにも載っていない❗ひねづけの作り方/
ひね漬け	146

https://kotobank.jp/word/古漬け-1496108
https://kotobank.jp/word/古漬-621921

Don't see a need for the x-ref.

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2098510">追ん出す</xref>

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>おん出る</keb>

Daijr/s. 新明解 says "口頭語".

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/追ん出る/

あまのり, あさくさのり and むらさきのり have their own entries. Nikk associates 紫菜 with 赤菜 as another name for 日野菜 (hinona).

@@ -7,21 +6,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>あまのり</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>アマノリ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>あさくさのり</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>アサクサノリ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>むらさきのり</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ムラサキノリ</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-</r_ele>
@@ -37,5 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>nori (Porphyra tenera)</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<stagr>むらさきな</stagr>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2694600">日野菜・ひのな</xref>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

https://kotobank.jp/word/紫菜-1761490
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/アサクサノリ

採食	41280
Daijs, Reverso, Unidic

https://kotobank.jp/word/採食-1322698
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/採食
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=採食

Possibly ephemeral. Sounds a bit of a tautology to me, but a lot of Japanese expressions do.

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20210514/k10013029911000.html
バイデン大統領 “ワクチン接種完了者はマスク不要”の新指針

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/51ea163e2399c09ef1563667248e173346ac965d
"来月5日からワクチン接種完了者...海外から帰国後“自己隔離”免除＝韓国"

https://www.cnn.co.jp/usa/35170868.html
"米ニューヨーク州、ワクチン接種完了者のマスク義務解除"

https://www.us.emb-japan.go.jp/j/announcement/20210405importantmessagecoronavirus.pdf
"当地でのワクチン接種／接種完了者に関する推奨事項"

ワクチン接種完了者	No matches
接種完了者	No matches
完了者	2503

未完了者	101 (saw ワクチン接種未完了者 on a jetro.go.jp page)

we could have a 完了者 entry as well/instead.

Add med field to selected entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-55203844

Also, the "sonic attacks" theory has largely been abandoned. The latest US government report says that it's mostly likely the result of directed microwave radiation.
I'm not sure this should be an entry. Feels a bit premature to be adding it at this stage.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Havana syndrome (illness allegedly caused by acoustic attacks)</gloss>
+<gloss>Havana syndrome (unexplained symptoms experienced by American embassy staff)</gloss>

the syndrome shouldn't be described as 
"attacks" but the illness caused by the 
attacks.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Havana syndrome (alleged acoustic attacks on embassy staff)</gloss>
+<gloss>Havana syndrome (illness allegedly caused by acoustic attacks)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Havana syndrome</gloss>
+<gloss>Havana syndrome (alleged acoustic attacks on embassy staff)</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -18 +19 @@
-<gloss>equally</gloss>
+<gloss>(treating) equally</gloss>
@@ -20 +21,3 @@
-<gloss>treating the same way</gloss>
+<gloss>impartially</gloss>
+<gloss>alike</gloss>
+<gloss>in the same way</gloss>

分け隔て	57466
わけ隔て	6115
分け隔てなく	37898
わけ隔てなく	4919

We already have 分け隔て, etc. as an entry, but I see that these ...なく forms are the most common use, so it's probably best to have them as well.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>treating the same way</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=分け隔て
https://www.weblio.jp/content/分け隔てなく
https://biz.trans-suite.jp/433

daijr/s

More senses.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -10,2 +11,2 @@
-<gloss>(being) in tune</gloss>
-<gloss>(being) on the same wavelength</gloss>
+<gloss>being in tune (with each other)</gloss>
+<gloss>being on the same wavelength</gloss>
@@ -12,0 +14,12 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>being leaked (of information, secrets, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
+<gloss>(passing through) without hindrance</gloss>
+<gloss>unobstructed</gloss>
+<gloss>unimpeded</gloss>
+<gloss>easily</gloss>

GG5 - points to つうかあ. 中辞典. Daijs has a second sense.
つうつう	2589
つうつうな	56

@@ -9,2 +9,4 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<gloss>in tune, on the same wavelength</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2830503">つうかあ</xref>
+<gloss>(being) in tune</gloss>
+<gloss>(being) on the same wavelength</gloss>
+<gloss>understanding each other</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/つうつう-570605
at 1:10    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lO7iurA3FXg&list=PLtpAa6BruKZbLDCGHv9rgbraAphScS18Z&index=4

My first entry, sorry if I mistag something

GG5, etc.

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>auto garage</gloss>
-<gloss>car mechanic's</gloss>
+<gloss>auto-repair shop</gloss>
+<gloss>service station</gloss>
+<gloss>garage</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=自動車修理工場

GG5, etc.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>bright new talent</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/大型新人

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>coinciding with</gloss>
+<gloss>coinciding (with)</gloss>

時を同じく	73201	  
時を同じくして	68109	  
時を同じくする	1099	
中辞典

At first I thought 時を同じく alone might be more suitable, but I see this expression is the most common pattern.

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>concurrently</gloss>
+<gloss>simultaneously</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=時を同じくして

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aubrieta_deltoidea

GG5

Aligning.

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1754050">浅草海苔・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1754050">アサクサノリ・1</xref>
@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>purple laver (Porphyra tenera)</gloss>
+<gloss>Pyropia tenera (species of edible seaweed)</gloss>

Koj/Daijr/etc.: 浅草海苔の別称。

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_algae

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>Rhodophyta</gloss>

GG5, 医学英和辞典
紅藻類	4714

GG5: a scarcity of goods; an inadequate supply 《of…》.
Daijr: 生産量が需要に及ばず，品物が出回らないこと
Daijs: 品物が市場に出回らないこと。品薄なこと。
Koj: 品物が出回らないこと。品薄。

This seems to be the meaning.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>remain unsold (of products)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1490660">品薄</xref>
+<gloss>scarcity of goods</gloss>
+<gloss>being out of stock</gloss>

koj daij nikk

品枯れ	67
品枯	No matches

saw in 1951 book (as 品枯). maybe dated/obs

GG5, 中辞典, etc.
品質検査	48736

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>滞無く</keb>
+<keb>遅滞無く</keb>
@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

遅滞なく	245512
遅滞無く	3131
GG5, Lawdic, RP

Useful and common.

I don't like the "formed directly in its own packaging" as it implies the processing takes place there, and it doesn't - it just sets there. But I really can't think of a succinct way of expressing that.

Thank you, yes, wordiness is an ongoing weakness. Though I'm becoming a mini-expert on all kinds of random topics...

Having researched and written so much, I really tried for a more concise [expl].  It's just not easy.

I've made a second suggestion of just cribbing the wikipedia note.  At least it "suggests" what's special about juten vs. other tofus. (traditionally formed in large blocks, cut into small blocks, and placed into containers with water added).

"tofu in sealed packaging" has somewhat the same issue as "packaged". All varieties of grocery-store tofu are sold in sealed packaging. It's just a question of when the sealing happens. The defining aspect of this tofu is that it is uncongealed/liquid when sealed into the container.

The gloss would be simpler if tofu was "cooked". ("tofu cooked in sealed packaging").  Unfortunately, this isn't considered cooking. I haven't found a concise, unambiguous English word that works. (set, set up, congealed, hardened, coagulated). 

"tofu coagulated in its own packaging" is correct, it just looks kind of offputting...  

"formed" seems as good as anything.

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">(silken) tofu in sealed packaging</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">(silken) tofu formed directly in its own packaging</gloss>

https://delishkitchen.tv/articles/887#contents2
充填豆腐	2089

Nice (if over-wordy) analysis. I think this simpler gloss works.

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -21,2 +21 @@
-<gloss>juten tofu</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="expl">(silken) tofu heated and formed within its own sealed packaging</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">(silken) tofu in sealed packaging</gloss>

A modest history of the development of this product:
Uses: Packaged lactone silken tofu (juten-dofu)...("filled tofu")
https://www.soyinfocenter.com/HSS/tofu7.php

"Soyfoods", winter 1982
https://www.google.co.jp/books/edition/Soyfoods_Winter_1982/UF1u8rg1jLcC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq="juten+tofu"+"filled"&pg=PA22&printsec=frontcover
The Japan Packaged Tofu Association... handles the growing sector that produces "lactone silken tofu"(juten dofu), literally "filled tofu, heat coagulated, formed in the package"... juten has captured 10% of the market.

How it's made:
充填とうふができるまで
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRQ4vFa46z4

The form without rendaku seems to be preferred by manufacturers (and ngrams).  Google 充填とうふ vs 充填どうふ. Some example of 充填とうふ:
http://machida-shokuhin.co.jp/lineup/zyuuten.html
https://www.kyotofu.co.jp/itemlist/item_cat/fill
https://www.i-love-tofu.jp/umayakko

One example of 充填豆腐 as sold in the west.  Morinaga was one of the original developers and exporters of the technology.  All exported Morinaga tofu is 充填豆腐.  It simply is not labeled in any remarkable way whatsoever. (except "long shelf life", which is particular to Morinaga and not required. Grocery 充填豆腐 is good for ~2 weeks).
https://morinaganutrition.com/products/mori-nu-silken-tofu-extra-firm

https://www.japanesefoodguide.com/types-of-tofu/
Jūten tōfu (Long shelf-life pasteurized tofu)
Jūten tōfu (充填豆腐, じゅうてん・どうふ) is pasteurized, and is heated then cooled in its packaging. It usually comes packaged in paper cartons or comes vacuum-packed, and has a longer shelf-life than regular packaged tofu.

https://www.likejapan.com.au/column/food-culture/tofu.html
Most of the tōfu sold in supermarkets is generally jūten-tōfu, also known as jūten-kinugoshi-tōfu. This type of tōfu is made by adding setting agents to cooled tōnyū and pouring it directly into a package before heating it to make it set

https://www.justonecookbook.com/tofu-the-nutrient-rich-superfood/
Jyuten (Juten) tofu is shelf-stable kinu tofu, packaged without water. It’s made by the soybeans and nigari mixture seal packed and cooled in the container to harden. 

Here's an example of an English translation of a Japanese product in the Japanese market:
https://eng.topvalu.net/items/detail/4549741779975/
Name	juten tofu (filled tofu)
Ingredients	soybean(Canada)

充填豆腐	2089	94.1%
充塡豆腐	0	0.0%
充填とうふ	132	5.9%
充塡とうふ	0	0.0%
充填どうふ	0	0.0%
充塡どうふ	0	0.0%

The *only* mention wikipedia English gives is an aside in the "coagulants" section:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tofu
Glucono delta-lactone (GDL):... Using GDL as a coagulant, silken tofu can be formed directly in its container, as it does not require pressing

wikipedia.jp claims an English gloss of "packaged tofu", but this is a bit silly.  All tofu in the grocery store is "packaged".  Google "packaged tofu" yields nothing on this.

There is literally no adequate English gloss. In the west this product is called... "tofu". Or marketed as just-another "silken tofu".

"jūten tofu" yields the most useful search responses (both google and google book search).

I had added a [lit] gloss of "packed tofu" ("filled tofu" also possible).  But this is 1. literal/derivable, and 2. all-but-useless.

refs. suggest non-rendaku reading is the most accepted. じゅうてんとうふ

充塡豆腐 appears in reputable sources. (and 充塡 is just a less common alt. of 充填).

It seems to be called 充填 because the tofu completely fills its packaging. It's basically airtight, vs. traditional tofu cut from large blocks, with each block floating in water.

I bought a pack of 充填豆腐. Maybe 6 brands to choose from. Labeled on the front as silken tofu (絹ごし豆腐), "nutritional info/legal name" 名称 for all products states: 充填豆腐

If you want to be really crazy with glosses, the 1982 "Soyfoods Industry Directory & Databook" called this "packaged lactone silken tofu" (vs. bagged lactone silken tofu).  "lactone", or GDL(Glucono-delta-lactone), is the coagulant, but it isn't unique to this product either.

@@ -6,0 +7,7 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>充塡豆腐</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>じゅうてんとうふ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -13 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>packaged tofu</gloss>
+<gloss>jūten tofu</gloss>
+<gloss>juten tofu</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">(silken) tofu heated and formed within its own sealed packaging</gloss>

Wiki: 今日、豆腐は木綿豆腐、ソフト豆腐、絹ごし豆腐、充填豆腐の4種に大別される

Not the usual meaning of 充填. WWW images seem mostly to be of pre-packaged tofu. I suspect Eijiro's "filled tofu" is a bit off.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>filled tofu</gloss>

What I see more often.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>firm tofu</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/豆腐#豆腐の一般的な分類

堅豆腐	3000
固豆腐	483

Aligning.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>tofu made with a coagulant and no added water</gloss>
+<gloss>soft, unpressed tofu</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/寄豆腐-2091434
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/豆腐
https://allabout-japan.com/en/article/4087/2/

寄せ豆腐	23437
寄豆腐	124

Quiet. I'll close these.

https://spoonuniversity.com/lifestyle/14-types-of-tofu-you-didnt-know-existed - "Oboro tofu is the curds of kinugoshi tofu, and has a soft and fluffy texture and taste"
https://restaurants-guide.tokyo/column/tofu-bean-curd/ - "Yose dofu is made by scooping out hot soy milk curdled with coagulant and placing it in a bag or container. As it is neither pressed nor immersed in water, it has a unique texture and flavor, different from momen tofu. Yose tofu is alternatively called oboro tofu. Oboro is the name for a moon half hidden in clouds, and one theory claims that oboro tofu is so named because it resembles a hazy moon."

I am concerned that the proposed glosses for this and yose dofu don't really explain what it is. Maybe this works better. I'm avoiding the good old "variety of ...".

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2849229">寄せ豆腐</xref>
@@ -16 +17 @@
-<gloss>tofu made with a coagulant and no added water</gloss>
+<gloss>soft, unpressed tofu</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/朧豆腐-454366
https://kotobank.jp/word/おぼろ豆腐-1284506
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/豆腐
https://allabout-japan.com/en/article/4087/2/

おぼろ豆腐	34175
朧豆腐		665

https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20210426/p2a/00m/0na/008000c
Japan experts issue warning over rise in street drinking


路上飲み	106

I've seen this on the news and considered adding it, but decided not to based on the low ngram counts. But I guess it doesn't hurt.
I think the glosses should be more literal.

@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>outdoor drinking</gloss>
-<gloss>drinking in public</gloss>
+<gloss>street drinking</gloss>
+<gloss>drinking in the streets</gloss>
+<gloss>public drinking</gloss>

https://bunshun.jp/articles/-/45338
https://www.sankeibiz.jp/macro/news/210502/mca2105021500004-n1.htm
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20210519/k10013039971000.html

Saw a sign with this word in Setagaya. It might be getting more popular as of late.

I think we should avoid "thrice" in glosses.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>to write the character for "person" thrice on the hand and mimic swallowing them (to calm nerves)</gloss>
+<gloss>to write the kanji for "person" on one's hand three times and mimic swallowing them (as a technique for calming one's nerves)</gloss>

人を飲む	552 (some false positives.)

* https://skdesu.com/en/nervous-write-people-hand-swallow/
* https://hinative.com/en-US/questions/15979509
* https://www.reddit.com/r/haikyuu/comments/gma18o/hito_wo_nomu_人を飲む_is_a_japanese_belief_used_to/
* https://archive.is/RjrD6 (Quora)

* http://folklore.usc.edu/eating-the-people-on-your-hand-japanese-folk-belief/

Examples in use:
* https://twitter.com/Hinako_1751114/status/1387747261837307911
* https://twitter.com/LoveLost_Mine/status/1391020218927882241
* https://twitter.com/HANGETU3/status/1388096800750329864

Probably used literally more often.

Nicolas went off on another fork.

Further down that page it says:
出会い厨とは、「出会い目的ではない場所に、出会いのみを求めてやってくる人間」「SNSをセフレ探しで使う人間」のことです。

That seems to fit, but feel free to offer alternatives.

First hit for the word is this article:
https://woman.mynavi.jp/article/190320-5/
SNS経由のDMで「電話番号教えて？」や「どこ住み？」などと、会ったこともない人に突然聞かれた経験はありませんか？
もしかしたら、その相手、「出会い厨」かもしれません。
meaning seems very different from this definition.

出会い厨	4498

I think a little clearer.

@@ -13,2 +13 @@
-<misc>&derog;</misc>
-<gloss>person goes to offline events with a sexual purpose</gloss>
+<gloss>person who goes to meetups with a sexual purpose</gloss>

https://dic.nicovideo.jp/a/出会い厨
https://dic.pixiv.net/a/出会い厨

Trimming suggestion.

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>person who attends meetups or uses social networking services solely to proposition people for sex</gloss>
+<gloss>person who attends meetups or uses social media to proposition people for sex</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&net-sl;</misc>

In an edit that was bypassed I wrote:
Further down that page it says:
出会い厨とは、「出会い目的ではない場所に、出会いのみを求めてやってくる人間」「SNSをセフレ探しで使う人間」のことです。
Comments: 	
That seems to fit, but feel free to offer alternatives.

Robin's version looks fine.

I think this works.

@@ -13,6 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>person who goes to meetups with a sexual purpose</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
-<gloss>person who insists on meeting up in person (after a brief online encounter)</gloss>
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
+<gloss>person who attends meetups or uses social networking services solely to proposition people for sex</gloss>

リーダーズ+プラス

https://kotobank.jp/word/天然橋-102662
wiki

ゼバスチャン	205
セバスティアン	7465

I think ゼバスティアン is more for transliterations from German.

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>セバスティアン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ゼバスチャン</reb>

ゼバスティアン	388
セバスチャン	152100

Merging

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ゼバスティアン</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8 +11 @@
-<misc>&unclass;</misc>
+<misc>&male;</misc>

Merged

Merged

GG5, etc.

Testing out a possible approach to handling entries related to specific people.

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<misc>&person;</misc>
+<gloss>Beethoven, Ludwig van (1770-1827)</gloss>

ngrams
ベートーベン	7966
ベートーヴェン	12073
ヴェートーベン	58

more readings from the edict entry

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<reb>ベートーヴェン</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -6,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヴェートーベン</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8 +14 @@
-<misc>&person;</misc>
+<misc>&surname;</misc>

Merged

Merged

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<gloss>Johann Sebastian Bach (1685-1750), German composer</gloss>
+<gloss>Johann Sebastian Bach (1685-1750; German composer)</gloss>

ヨハンセバスチャンバッハ	67
ヨハンゼバスチャンバッハ	2
ヨハンゼバスティアンバッハ	11 <- Wikipedia version
ヨハンセバスティアンバッハ	37

Big merge. N-grams and WWW hits conflict.

@@ -6,0 +7,21 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヨハンセバスティアンバッハ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヨハンセバスチャンバッハ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヨハンゼバスチャンバッハ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヨハン・ゼバスティアン・バッハ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヨハン・セバスティアン・バッハ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヨハン・セバスチャン・バッハ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ヨハン・ゼバスチャン・バッハ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -9 +30 @@
-<gloss>Johann Sebastian Bach</gloss>
+<gloss>Johann Sebastian Bach (1685-1750), German composer</gloss>

Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

wiki
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/pickup/6393813