Removing this.

Making a test edit, which I'll reject shortly.

Bulk update: Replace n-t with n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

gg5

@@ -12,2 +12,1 @@
-<gloss>yellow-backed novel</gloss>
-<gloss>dime novel</gloss>
+<gloss>illustrated storybook with yellow covers (Edo period)</gloss>

Our only example sentence is for the new sense 3.

gg5

Splitting into senses. Note, of my refs, only gg5/saito have "context" as a sense.

@@ -15,0 +16,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2846607">後先になる</xref>
@@ -16,0 +21,5 @@
+<gloss>sequence</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2211800">後先考えず</xref>
@@ -17,0 +27,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1417250">単眼鏡・たんがんきょう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1417250">単眼鏡</xref>
@@ -20,2 +19,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1501310">複眼・ふくがん</xref>
-<field>&ent;</field>
+<xref type="see" seq="1501310">複眼</xref>
+<field>&zool;</field>

almost all my refs xref with 複眼

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1501310">複眼・ふくがん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1501310">複眼・ふくがん</xref>

No comments. Closing.

GG5: a single eye; 【動】 〔複眼に対して〕 an ocellus 《pl. -li》 (ocellar adj.); a simple eye; (その一種) a stemma 《pl. -mata, ～s》; 〔カメラなどの〕 a single lens.
中辞典: 〈昆虫･幼虫の〉 a simple eye; a stemma 《【複】 stemata, stemmas》; 〈無脊椎動物の〉 an ocellus 《【複】 ocelli》.
ルミナス: 	(昆虫の) simple eye [C], ocellus /oIPA-Us´elschwas/ [C] 《複 ocelli /oIPA-Us´elaIPA-I/》　★後者は専門用語. 単眼鏡 monocular

The refs don't split, but I think this is clearer. Maybe "biol" rather than "ent".

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1417250">単眼鏡・たんがんきょう</xref>
+<gloss>single eye</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +16,7 @@
+<gloss>single lens</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&ent;</field>
+<gloss>simple eye</gloss>
+<gloss>ocellus</gloss>

daijr
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compound_eye

Not just insects.

@@ -16,3 +16,3 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1417240">単眼・たんがん・2</xref>
-<field>&ent;</field>
-<gloss>compound eyes</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1417240">単眼・2</xref>
+<field>&zool;</field>
+<gloss>compound eye</gloss>

almost all my refs xref with 単眼

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1417240">単眼・たんがん・2</xref>
+<field>&ent;</field>

daij, meikyo

I don't think sense 1 needs a linguistics tag. It's not a technical term.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<field>&ling;</field>
@@ -24,2 +23 @@
-<gloss>context</gloss>
-<gloss>environment</gloss>
+<gloss>context (of a matter, event, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -26,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>background</gloss>

GG5 split it into two senses. Most of the kokugos split it too.

@@ -17,0 +18,6 @@
+<field>&ling;</field>
+<gloss>context (of a passage)</gloss>
+<gloss>line of thought</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +25,2 @@
+<gloss>environment</gloss>
+<gloss>circumstances</gloss>

General term methinks.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<field>&ling;</field>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>a radiator</gloss>
+<gloss>radiator</gloss>

GG5, etc.

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>a resident</gloss>
+<gloss>resident</gloss>
+<gloss>residents</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>a stowaway</gloss>
+<gloss>stowaway</gloss>

daij, koj

I don't think "fold" or "crease" is correct.

@@ -14,2 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>fold</gloss>
-<gloss>crease</gloss>

GG5

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<gloss>a fold or crease</gloss>
+<gloss>break</gloss>
+<gloss>split</gloss>
+<gloss>fold</gloss>
+<gloss>crease</gloss>

daij, gg5, www images

For sense 2, the key detail is that it's right-angled. Also, 釘 = nail (but there are plenty of screws in the online image results).

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>hooked nail</gloss>
-<gloss>broken nail</gloss>
+<gloss>bent nail</gloss>
+<gloss>crooked nail</gloss>
@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>screw hook</gloss>
+<gloss>'L' hook (nail or screw)</gloss>
+<gloss>square bend screw hook</gloss>

GG5, etc.

@@ -12 +12,6 @@
-<gloss>hooked or broken nail</gloss>
+<gloss>hooked nail</gloss>
+<gloss>broken nail</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>screw hook</gloss>

差し掛け小屋	103
さしかけ小屋	No matches
差掛け小屋	No matches
差しかけ小屋	34

Not a common term.

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>差しかけ小屋</keb>
@@ -11,0 +15 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>a lean-to</gloss>
+<gloss>lean-to</gloss>

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<keb>掻掘</keb>
+<keb>搔い掘り</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,2 +15,2 @@
-<keb>搔い掘り</keb>
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<keb>掻掘</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -25 +26 @@
-<gloss>draining a pond, lake, or ditch (esp. to remove fish, purify water, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>draining a pond, lake or ditch (esp. to remove fish, purify water, etc.)</gloss>

[vt]: shinmeikai, meikyo, oukoku
shinmeikai and meikyo only have our sense [1]; oukoku has both senses.

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -28,0 +30 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Thanks

新明解５: かいぼり [0]【掻い掘り・掻掘】
精選版 日本国語大辞典: かい‐ぼり【掻掘】

Only 日国 and 新明解 have 掻掘. As stated in my previous comment, 掻掘 seems to just be getting hits from the book title 掻掘のおけい

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>掻掘</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -11,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>掻掘</keb>

GG5, etc.

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>to beat (egg)</gloss>
-<gloss>to whip (cream)</gloss>
+<gloss>to beat (e.g. eggs)</gloss>
+<gloss>to whip (e.g. cream)</gloss>

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>to beat</gloss>
-<gloss>to whip</gloss>
+<gloss>to beat (egg)</gloss>
+<gloss>to whip (cream)</gloss>

http://eow.alc.co.jp/泡立て/UTF-8/?ref=sa

@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>to whisk</gloss>
+<gloss>to lather</gloss>

No further comments. Closing.

I don't think "linked form; bound ending" are actually wrong; it's more that they are trying to give short general translations without describing in detail what actually happens with a 係り結び. I think GG5 would have been better including a slightly longer explanation as well, but I guess for most dictionary users it's a minor and arcane term.

https://www.academia.edu/3228978/Non_movement_and_kakari_musubi_in_Old_
Japanese
kakari-musubi is a syntactic pattern in which a so-called kakari-
particle triggers a particular form of the main-clause predicate of a 
sentence.

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/gengo1939/2000/118/2000_118_81/_pd
f/-char/en
Kakari musubi is a set of syntactic constructions in which so-called 
kakari particles, inserted sentence-medially, link to a non-conclusive

係り結び refers to a grammatical phenomenon or rule,
as the kokugos imply, so "linked form; bound ending"
is not accurate.
For example, the 未然形 ending -a is also bound,
but we do not call it 係り結び.

GG5: 【国文法】 a linked form; (a) bound ending.
ルミナス: 〔言〕 postpositional particle-verb agreement in literary Japanese [U]　★説明的な訳.

The original was rather inadequate, and your proposed correction is welcome. I like to lead with shorter glosses, and I think this succinct explanation gets to the point. With "verb agreement" there's no need to say conjugation specifically.

@@ -16 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>correlation between binding particles and sentence-final conjugations in Literary Japanese</gloss>
+<gloss>linked form</gloss>
+<gloss>bound ending</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">postpositional particle-verb agreement in literary Japanese</gloss>

"conjugations" is more accurate

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>correlation between binding particles and sentence-final endings in Literary Japanese</gloss>
+<gloss>correlation between binding particles and sentence-final conjugations in Literary Japanese</gloss>

koj, daijr/s, nikk
百舌勘定	No matches

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Entry created

OK

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ジャボチカバ
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/植物の進化
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microphylls_and_megaphylls

I looked some more into it, 小葉 has "small leaf" meaning on daijisen/daijiten/daijirin, so that should also be relevant I think (although currently missing on JMDict)
Also in the first reference link above from wikipedia they are used with 系: 日本では小葉系と大葉系と中葉系（大実の成る系統はアッスーと名付けられている）に分類され流通している。

From the second link: 一般的には葉と言えば「大葉（en:megaphylls）」であり and 大葉（いわゆる「葉」）の葉脈の枝分かれパターンは、2分岐が網目状になったものが起源である可能性がある。
So it seems to be more about the fact that 大葉(Megaphylls) have a complex network of veins, as it explains in the third link
So the j-j dictionary entries might be not up to date on this

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>megaphylls</gloss>

大辞泉 seems to be alone with that sense.

Funny that no other reference has it. WWW hits and images are all for perilla leaves.

@@ -13 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>large leaf</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1311720">紫蘇</xref>
+<gloss>beefsteak plant</gloss>
+<gloss>perilla</gloss>
@@ -18,3 +20 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1311720">紫蘇</xref>
-<gloss>beefsteak plant</gloss>
-<gloss>perilla</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">large leaf</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/大葉-450531

missing definition for "大きな葉。"

@@ -9,0 +10,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>large leaf</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&dated;</misc>
@@ -26 +26,0 @@
-<misc>&dated;</misc>

まぶだち	4274
まぶ達	250
マブだち	522
マブ達	1389
マブダチ	43155

I can see some current use, but I see zokugo-dict dates it from 1981.

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<keb>マブ達</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -7,3 +10,4 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>マブ達</keb>
-</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>マブだち</reb>
+<re_restr>マブ達</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
@@ -13,4 +16,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>マブだち</reb>
-<re_restr>マブ達</re_restr>
@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<misc>&dated;</misc>

An informant (late 20s) told me this is a bit dated now. I was a little mocked for using it.

n-grams

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

Yes, a very odd one.

G n-grams: No matches

Entry created

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1436570">締める・しめる・3</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1436570">締める・3</xref>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1436570">締める・しめる・7</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1436570">締める・7</xref>

ルミナス (extra 締める entry) (鳥の首などを) wring [他] 《しめころす》.

I'll add that to the 締める entry, As for remerging, i.e. undoing the 2012 split, I feel we need to be on much stronger ground to do that. The old merged entry was a mess of restrictions. For now I'd rather keep it as-is with xrefs.

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1436570">締める・しめる・7</xref>

I meant that "to kill" should prob. be added 
as a sense to 締める rather than 〆る. but yes, 
also that the 2 should probably be merged. I'm 
not convinced 〆る can't be used for several 
other if not all of the senses in 締める.
eg. sense 6 of 締める written as 〆る here:
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/quest
ion_detail/q1146903691
(I'm on my phone so I haven't looked into this 
all that deeply)

Merging would be messy as they seem to only overlap by one or two senses. BTW, which sense of 締める is "魚を締める" related to? I'm having trouble with it.

this is probably more common as 魚を締める 
(that's what google suggested for the ibput 魚
をし)
I tgink 〆る should be merged w 締める

@@ -9 +9 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1270700">おめでとう</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2848748">おめでとうさん</xref>

I just put in the sequence number. I guess I should specify the preferred surface form. It would be good for "uk" terms if it defaulted to the kana form.

I think we should avoid using uncommon kanji in x-refs.

@@ -8,2 +8,2 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1270700">お目出度う・おめでとう</xref>
+<pos>&int;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1270700">おめでとう</xref>

おめっとさん	17180

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1270700">お目出度う・おめでとう</xref>

Can't argue with that.

I don't mind the word "fappable" (the original 
is slang-y so it's an ok match register-wise) 
but I agree having シコる should be enough.

"Fappable" is such a silly word. This gloss looks comical. シコれる just means "I can jerk off (to that)". I don't think it should be an entry.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fappable

I had no idea what it meant.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2595020">シコる</xref>

https://www.wdic.org/w/MOE/シコれる

Maybe.

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<misc>&derog;</misc>
+<misc>&fam;</misc>

I read daijs as "derog, or sometimes just 
rough"
so derog,fam is maybe appropriate?

daijs: 男の集まりをさげすんで、**またはぞんざいに**言う語。
https://context.reverso.net/translation/japanese-english/野郎ども

Also used as a noun. Not necessarily derogatory.
Surprised it's an entry in daijs. Feels rather A+B.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>野郎ども</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11,4 +14,5 @@
-<pos>&int;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1234250">共・ども・2</xref>
-<gloss>idiots!</gloss>
-<gloss>bastards!</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1234250">ども・2</xref>
+<gloss>bastards</gloss>
+<gloss>guys</gloss>
+<gloss>lads</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/野郎共/
Daijs: 男の集まりをさげすんで、またはぞんざいに言う語。
野郎ども	74101
野郎共	26675

Perhaps not that obvious from the components.

e.g. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjhg/58/5/58_489/_article/-char/ja/
路上活動	2234

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>street activism</gloss>
+<gloss>on-street activities (peforming, collecting, etc.)</gloss>

https://twitter.com/search?q=路上活動&f=live
https://www.facebook.com/events/sakuragichō-station/動物のための路上活動-street-activism-for-animals/209575026309708/

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&cards;</field>
@@ -10 +11 @@
-<gloss>misère (in card games)</gloss>
+<gloss>misère</gloss>

I'm not sure about bridge. Better to be general.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>misère (card game variation where the goal is the opposite of what's usual)</gloss>
+<gloss>misère (in card games)</gloss>

It seems to be both according to the goo 
dictionary link, I'm not familiar with the 
word in either language so I decided to 
translate it in accordance with the context in 
which I found it (the last link). It might be 
better to just say something like "misere (in 
bridge, etc.)"

In my experience, a misère is deliberately losing all the tricks in a game like solo or euchre. Is ミゼール so different from that? (I find it hard to grok Japanese card games.)

OK

daijr
延べ竿	4500
のべ竿	6822

I think we can split it into two senses.
The kokugos also have a non-fishing sense.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>のべ竿</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12 +15,4 @@
-<gloss>jointless fishing rod, usu. with no reel and the line connected to the tip</gloss>
+<gloss>fishing rod with the line connected to the tip (i.e. without a reel or guides)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +20,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1579450">三味線</xref>
+<gloss>one-piece shamisen neck</gloss>

Maybe this works. Certainly this seems to be the modern usage.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>jointless fishing rod, usu. with no reel and the line connected to the tip</gloss>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>jointless fishing rod</gloss>

https://fishingjapan.jp/fishing/8315
https://tsurihack.com/1618
http://hisayukitakuko.web.fc2.com/rod.jpg

from the first link:延べ竿とは、ラインを通すガイドの付いていないロッドのことです。
from the second link: 延べ竿(のべ竿)とは、竿先にそのまま糸を結んで使う釣竿の総称。
the third link visually shows the difference, also the other links I've found and the images results from google image all agree that the fact it doesn't use a reel or guide and that the line is linked to the tip is what sets it apart
The second link also go on on saying: 元々は継ぎがなく、竹などのを用いた１本の釣り竿のことを指し、リールを取り付ける部分や、糸を通すガイドはありません。現在では技術の進歩とともに、伸縮できる振出タイプになっています。
Therefore I tend to believe that even the j-j entry from the dictionaries are not up to date with this item

GG5, ルミナス

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>bamboo fishing rod</gloss>
-<gloss>fishing rod that has the line connected to the tip</gloss>
+<gloss>fishing rod made of a single piece of bamboo</gloss>
+<gloss>jointless fishing rod</gloss>

gg5, daij, koj

化製場	12261

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>rendering plant</gloss>
+<gloss>rendering plant for livestock carcasses</gloss>

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/化製場
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/化製場

Yes, separate entries for them would be best.

https://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~rp9h-tkhs/dg_touko.htm
wiki
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/投壺
投壺	498
投壷	226
koj daij etc.

could also contain the readings つぼなげ and つぼうち
つぼ-うち【投壺・壺打ち】
つぼ-なげ【投壺・壺投げ】
but I feel those would be better as separate entries, having them in here would be messy

Indeed. Merged. Thanks.

belongs to 1138850

ラジエター	102629
ラジエタ	6620

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ラジエタ</reb>

https://kotobank.jp/word/ラジエター-876796

おめでとさん	54276
おめでとうさん	25740

https://www.weblio.jp/content/おめでとさん

GG5: 【解】 a lobe; a lobule; a lobulus; 【植】 〔複葉の〕 a foliole; a leaflet.

Perhaps the second sense can be split.

@@ -11,0 +12,10 @@
+<field>&anat;</field>
+<gloss>lobe</gloss>
+<gloss>lobule</gloss>
+<gloss>lobulus</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&bot;</field>
+<gloss>leaflet</gloss>
+<gloss>foliole</gloss>
@@ -13 +22,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">small leaf</gloss>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/小葉
https://kotobank.jp/word/小葉-533552

first link:  小葉 (microphyll) - 葉を進化的に分類した場合の一つで、維管束植物の葉のうちヒカゲノカズラ類が持つ葉のこと。葉脈が1本しかなく、葉隙を生じない葉。小成葉とも。
second link: 小さい葉。

クワシオルコール	100
クワシオルコル	305
マラスムス	153

https://kotobank.jp/word/マラスムス-772994
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/マラスムス

手に負える	10142
手に負えない	95449

Most of the occurrences of 手に負える are actually negative (e.g. 手に負えるものではない).

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2084650">手に負えない</xref>
+<s_inf>usu. in the negative</s_inf>

I'm a little surprised how common this one is.

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>able to handle</gloss>
-<gloss>manageable</gloss>
+<gloss>to be manageable</gloss>
+<gloss>to be able to handle</gloss>

https://www.waeijisho.net/word.html?id=32684
https://www.edrdg.org/~jwb/cgi-bin/ngramlookup?sent=手に負える

ngrams:
手に負える: 10142
手におえる: 2689

I don't see an entry for this in Daijirin or on weblio, but I encountered it in the wild and it seems unique enough of a construction that it's worth having its own entry. JMdict already has an entry for 手に負えない, which is more 
common.