All 5 sentences are for sense 4.

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

Reorganised the senses a little.

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1126980">マイナス・1</xref>
@@ -19,0 +21 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -21 +23,6 @@
-<gloss>positive number</gloss>
+<gloss>positive (number)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>plus sign</gloss>
+<gloss>positive symbol</gloss>
@@ -27 +34,10 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>advantage</gloss>
+<gloss>plus</gloss>
+<gloss>asset</gloss>
+<gloss>positive factor</gloss>
+<gloss>positive effect</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>profit</gloss>
@@ -29,3 +44,0 @@
-<gloss>advantage</gloss>
-<gloss>asset</gloss>
-<gloss>positive feature</gloss>
@@ -39,0 +53 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -41,2 +55 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1115710">プラスドライバー</xref>
-<gloss>+ shape</gloss>
+<gloss>positive (test result)</gloss>

mk

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -25,0 +27 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Samuel E. Martin, "A reference grammar of Japanese", page 820 cites the following examples:
建築費プラス百万円で (for construction costs plus a million yen)
一子音プラス一母音 (one consonant plus one vowel)
プラスさん (plus three, three over (count), up three)
百時間プラス (one hundred hours plus)

when used as a conjunction, can be written as ＋: 広辞苑は、国語辞典＋百科事典

@@ -11,0 +12,3 @@
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<pos>&pref;</pos>
+<pos>&suf;</pos>

daijr:
① 外交儀礼。国際儀礼。
② 外交などにおける議定書。
③ 実験・治療などの手順。

I think it's always communications for sense 1.
Daijr has 3 non-computing senses. Would it be better just to have a single "protocol" sense with no field tag?

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>protocol (esp. in communications)</gloss>
+<gloss>protocol (in communications)</gloss>
@@ -17,3 +17,10 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1614680">議定書・ぎていしょ</xref>
-<gloss>protocol</gloss>
-<gloss>agreed set of rules</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1614680">議定書</xref>
+<gloss>protocol (diplomatic document)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>protocol (system of rules)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>protocol (of a scientific experiment or course of medical treatment)</gloss>

GG5 (splits)

They're really the same thing but the computing/comms usage has a life of its own.

@@ -12,0 +13,5 @@
+<gloss>protocol (esp. in communications)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1614680">議定書・ぎていしょ</xref>
@@ -13,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>agreed set of rules</gloss>

daijr: 和歌や詩のひとつ

@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>tanka</gloss>
-<gloss>poem</gloss>
+<gloss>one tanka</gloss>
+<gloss>one poem</gloss>

Can't see how this is an adverb.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

Bulk update: Removal of n-t POS
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>

gg5, prog, daij
shinmeikai: 普通、今から十年くらい前を指す。

Only one sense in the refs. It doesn't mean ten years precisely.

@@ -21,8 +21,3 @@
-<gloss>ages</gloss>
-<gloss>long time</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>decade</gloss>
-<gloss>ten years (ago)</gloss>
+<gloss>an age (ago)</gloss>
+<gloss>a long time (ago)</gloss>
+<gloss>a decade (ago)</gloss>

"n-t" conversion to "n,adv", etc.

@@ -25 +25,2 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Daijr, GG5, etc.

@@ -26 +26,2 @@
-<gloss>ten years ago</gloss>
+<gloss>decade</gloss>
+<gloss>ten years (ago)</gloss>

@@ -23,2 +23,4 @@
-<gloss>decade</gloss>
-<gloss>the past ten years</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<gloss>ten years ago</gloss>

gg5, daijs

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>pair (footwear)</gloss>
+<gloss>a pair (of shoes or socks)</gloss>

Approving and reopening. It's upsetting the bulk update.

Can't see how this is an adverb.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

Bulk update: Removal of n-t POS
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>

Yes, better,

We need to specify it's "one", don't we? Because the basic understanding of a beginner would be that all Japanese nouns, unless specified 
otherwise, can be both be used for singular and plural.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>drop (of fluid)</gloss>
+<gloss>one drop (of fluid)</gloss>

Can't see how this is an adverb.

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>

daijr

Seems mislabeled as temporal.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

"n-t" conversion to "n,adv", etc.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

大辞林３

@@ -15,0 +16,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かっかんてき</reb>
+</r_ele>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>The Tale of Genji (Heian period classic)</gloss>
+<gloss>The Tale of Genji (Heian-period classic)</gloss>

Wiki: "a classic work of Japanese literature"

"epic" sounds/feels a bit odd to me. Implies battles, etc.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>The Tale of Genji (Heian period epic)</gloss>
+<gloss>The Tale of Genji (Heian period classic)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>The Tale of Genji</gloss>
+<gloss>The Tale of Genji (Heian period epic)</gloss>

Having just said that 平家物語 can stay here, I'd better be consistent.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&work;</misc>

See 1836000.

@@ -32 +32 @@
-<s_inf>epistolary style</s_inf>
+<s_inf>used in letters</s_inf>

This is probably more natural.

@@ -33 +33 @@
-<gloss>because it's a time of ...</gloss>
+<gloss>as it's a time of ...</gloss>

prog, wisdom
daijr: （接続助詞的に用いる）…の時であるから。手紙などに用いる語。「酷暑の―御自愛下さい」
折から	70341	80.9%
折りから	5649	6.5%
折柄	10032	11.5%
折り柄	918	1.1%

"appropriate moment" is an archaic sense. I've replaced it with the above sense.
折り柄 isn't in my refs. I think it can be dropped.
I can't find a source for the おりがら reading.

@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-<keb>折りから</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -16 +13,2 @@
-<keb>折り柄</keb>
+<keb>折りから</keb>
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -22,5 +19,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>おりがら</reb>
-<re_restr>折柄</re_restr>
-<re_restr>折り柄</re_restr>
@@ -34 +26,0 @@
-<gloss>right then</gloss>
@@ -39,3 +31,4 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>appropriate moment</gloss>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<s_inf>epistolary style</s_inf>
+<gloss>because it's a time of ...</gloss>
+<gloss>in this time of ...</gloss>

"n-t" conversion to "n,adv", etc.

@@ -30 +30,2 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -38 +39,2 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Not adverb. "n-t" conversion to "n,adv", etc.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

see comments on 1392750

@@ -15,1 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
@@ -17,0 +16,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -20,1 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
@@ -22,0 +21,1 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

that specification is inappropriate.  (e.g., as gg5 specifies, it also refers to metaphase in cell division)

@@ -17,1 +17,1 @@
-<gloss>middle period (e.g., of an era or century)</gloss>
+<gloss>middle period</gloss>

GG5

Clarify “middle of an *era*”, add “medium-term” sense.

@@ -17,1 +17,6 @@
-<gloss>middle period</gloss>
+<gloss>middle period (e.g., of an era or century)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<gloss>medium-term</gloss>

"n-t" conversion to "n,adv", etc.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
@@ -16,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

"toward morning" looks odd to me.

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n-t;</pos>
@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>toward morning</gloss>
+<gloss>early in the morning</gloss>

"n-t" conversion to "n,adv", etc.

@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -20 +21 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -26 +27 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -14,0 +14,1 @@
+<stagr>はんとき</stagr>

more clear with the article, i guess

@@ -21,1 +21,1 @@
-<gloss>hour</gloss>
+<gloss>an hour</gloss>

gg5, koj, daij, meikyo

half-an-hour is usually 半時間.  only kojien even mentions it as a potential meaning

@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>はんじ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -11,1 +14,0 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +15,13 @@
+<gloss>little while</gloss>
+<gloss>short time</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>hour</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>はんじ</stagr>
+<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>
+<gloss>half-hour</gloss>

"n-t" conversion to "n,adv", etc.

@@ -32 +32,2 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Aligning.

@@ -32 +32 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n-t;</pos>
@@ -34 +34 @@
-<s_inf>now. usu. 普段</s_inf>
+<s_inf>now written as 普段</s_inf>
@@ -37 +37 @@
-<gloss>general</gloss>
+<gloss>everyday</gloss>

Koj ((「普段」とも書く) 平生。平常。), Daijr, etc.

As suggested in the comment on the 普段 entry.

@@ -29,0 +30,12 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1497180">普段</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1497180">普段</xref>
+<s_inf>now. usu. 普段</s_inf>
+<gloss>usual</gloss>
+<gloss>normal</gloss>
+<gloss>general</gloss>
+<gloss>habitual</gloss>
+<gloss>ordinary</gloss>
+</sense>

Daijr (sense 2)

KM n-grams:
不断の	4831
不断な	2906
不断を	98
不断が	146

Changed to adjective glosses.
No need for the 普段 x-ref.
I believe the second sense is a noun first and foremost.

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -19,7 +19,5 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1497180">普段</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1497180">普段</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1497180">普段</xref>
-<gloss>constancy</gloss>
-<gloss>persistency</gloss>
-<gloss>continuity</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>constant</gloss>
+<gloss>persistent</gloss>
+<gloss>unremitting</gloss>
+<gloss>ceaseless</gloss>
@@ -27,0 +26 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -29 +28 @@
-<gloss>indecisive</gloss>
+<gloss>indecisiveness</gloss>

"n-t" conversion to "n,adv", etc.

@@ -21 +21,2 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -31 +32,2 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -38 +40,2 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

I'll leave this discussion here.

we have x-reffed ~some~ of them.  in general, i'm not sure it's necessary

It could, but I'd have to ask "why". There are heaps of these "verb-stem-nouns" - do we xref them all?

Hi, it might be worthwhile cross-referencing くれ to くれる.

GG5: 	a precious stone; a jewel; a gem.
中辞典: a precious jewel [gem].
Koj, Daijr, etc. say much the same.

I can't see any emphasis on it being spherical.

@@ -12,0 +13,2 @@
+<gloss>precious stone</gloss>
+<gloss>gem</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/宝玉-627338

貴重な玉。宝石。宝珠
The fact is a 玉, also checking 宝珠 which is defined in terms of 宝玉, both seems to stress the fact 宝玉 is a "spherical object" - the current definition is failing to convey that

daij, koj

おとづれる is 旧仮名遣い.
I don't think the arch senses are needed. They were only added in 2021 and we tend not to add archaic senses to existing entries (without good reason).

@@ -16,3 +15,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>おとづれる</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -28 +25 @@
-<gloss>to arrive (season, time, situation, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to arrive (of a season, situation, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -31,14 +27,0 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vi;</pos>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<s_inf>original meaning</s_inf>
-<gloss>to make a sound</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&v1;</pos>
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
-<gloss>to send a letter</gloss>
-<gloss>to inquire about a letter</gloss>

meikyo; daijr

Clarifying second sense. Guessed at the vi/vt tags.

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<gloss>to arrive</gloss>
+<gloss>to arrive (season, time, situation, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -31,0 +32,14 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<s_inf>original meaning</s_inf>
+<gloss>to make a sound</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v1;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>to send a letter</gloss>
+<gloss>to inquire about a letter</gloss>
+</sense>

Plenty of hits for 裏山な on Twitter.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -25 +25 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&net-sl;</misc>

http://bosesound.blog133.fc2.com/blog-entry-348.html
7 hits past 24 hrs on twitter for マジ裏山

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Jelly

@@ -21,0 +22,10 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1391940">うらやましい・1</xref>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<misc>&joc;</misc>
+<s_inf>pun on うらやましい</s_inf>
+<gloss>envious</gloss>
+<gloss>jealous</gloss>
+<gloss>jelly</gloss>
+</sense>

"n-t" conversion to "n,adv", etc.

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -21 +22,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -28,2 +30,2 @@
-<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Removing n-t from n-adv,n-t

@@ -22 +21,0 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>

koj, daij, meikyo, gg5, prog, nc

i think いっとき should go in with ひととき

@@ -16,3 +16,4 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>いっとき</reb>
-</r_ele>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<gloss>one o'clock</gloss>
+</sense>
@@ -21,0 +22,19 @@
+<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<gloss>once</gloss>
+<gloss>at one time</gloss>
+<gloss>formerly</gloss>
+<gloss>before</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-adv;</pos>
+<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<s_inf>in weather forecasts, indicates that a given condition will hold for less than one-quarter of the forecast period</s_inf>
+<gloss>for a time</gloss>
+<gloss>for a while</gloss>
+<gloss>for the time being</gloss>
+<gloss>for the present</gloss>
+<gloss>for the moment</gloss>
+<gloss>temporarily</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
@@ -22,2 +42,4 @@
-<gloss>one hour</gloss>
-<gloss>short time</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1162930">一時に</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1162930">一時に</xref>
+<gloss>a time</gloss>
+<gloss>one time</gloss>
@@ -25,4 +47,0 @@
-<gloss>a time</gloss>
-<gloss>temporarily</gloss>
-<gloss>at one time</gloss>
-<gloss>twelfth part of a day</gloss>

前足	355682
前脚	59317
前肢	29600
Koj: まえ‐あし【前足・前脚・前肢】  (Daijr/s similar)

It doesn't because the まえあし reading is common to them all. It's a bit difficult to determine the frequency of readings of compounds but Google hits seem to indicate that 前脚 and 前肢 are read まえあし more often than ぜんし or ぜんきゃく.
It's an example of JMdict's rather strong line on such merges.

Does this break 2/3 rule? or is it ok because of the intermediate steps

前足(まえあし) ⇔ 前肢(まえあし) ⇔ 前肢(ぜんし)

前足(まえあし) ⇔ 前脚(まえあし) ⇔ 前脚(ぜんきゃく)

カルタ	172412	26.5%
かるた	457291	70.2%
歌留多	15800	2.4%
骨牌	5078	0.8%
加留多	511	0.1%
嘉留太	0	0.0%
軽板	251	0.0%
軽多	52	0.0%
賀留多	86	0.0%
哥留多	0	0.0%

I'd hide them.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -25 +25 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -30 +30 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -35 +35 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -40 +40 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I don't think we're in the business of cataloguing every kanji form of a word that has ever been used. If we were, we might be adding 50 more forms to our entry for みだれる, for example.
https://w.atwiki.jp/kanjidego/pages/71.html
>> 乱れる、芜れる、紛れる、狼れる、潰れる、蕪れる、撓れる、撩れる、悖れる、蚩れる、紊れる、紜れる、訌れる、釠れる、溃れる、惷れる、溷れる、猾れる、亂れる、愂れる、厐れる、庞れる、駭れる、飚れる、濫れる、擾れる、龎れる、龐れる、攘れる、飆れる、飇れる、飙れる、飈れる、飊れる、忞れる、𢿢れる、𭢯れる、𢺕れる、瞀れる、溷れる、殽れる、棼れる、挐れる、戕れる、忞れる、惛れる、慁れる

I only see the first three forms for かるた in my dictionaries. I think the rest could be dropped or hidden. If that's no good, we should at least use the [rK] tag; we're using [oK] for kyūjitai.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -30 +30 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -35 +35 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -40 +40 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Not sure the hiragana version should be nokanji, but I guess it doesn't really matter.

かるたをし	1066	36.8%
カルタをし	1831	63.2%

Since かるた is very common, I don't think that would be a good idea.

"n-t" conversion to "n,adv", etc.

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -18 +19,2 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

"n-t" conversion to "n,adv", etc.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 余命幾ばく　 │  8,431 │ 31.6% │
│ 余命幾許　　 │  2,331 │  8.7% │
│ 余命幾何　　 │     83 │  0.3% │ - rK (daijr/s, koj, meikyo)
│ 余命いくばく │ 15,798 │ 59.3% │
╰─ーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5, meikyo

I don't think it's a noun.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>how much</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>how much</gloss>
+<gloss>what amount</gloss>
+<gloss>what extent</gloss>

"n-t" conversion to "n,adv", etc.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

GG5, etc.

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>to beat (egg)</gloss>
-<gloss>to whip (cream)</gloss>
+<gloss>to beat (e.g. eggs)</gloss>
+<gloss>to whip (e.g. cream)</gloss>

@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>to beat</gloss>
-<gloss>to whip</gloss>
+<gloss>to beat (egg)</gloss>
+<gloss>to whip (cream)</gloss>

http://eow.alc.co.jp/泡立て/UTF-8/?ref=sa

@@ -15,0 +15,2 @@
+<gloss>to whisk</gloss>
+<gloss>to lather</gloss>

No further comments. Closing.

I don't think "linked form; bound ending" are actually wrong; it's more that they are trying to give short general translations without describing in detail what actually happens with a 係り結び. I think GG5 would have been better including a slightly longer explanation as well, but I guess for most dictionary users it's a minor and arcane term.

https://www.academia.edu/3228978/Non_movement_and_kakari_musubi_in_Old_
Japanese
kakari-musubi is a syntactic pattern in which a so-called kakari-
particle triggers a particular form of the main-clause predicate of a 
sentence.

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/gengo1939/2000/118/2000_118_81/_pd
f/-char/en
Kakari musubi is a set of syntactic constructions in which so-called 
kakari particles, inserted sentence-medially, link to a non-conclusive

係り結び refers to a grammatical phenomenon or rule,
as the kokugos imply, so "linked form; bound ending"
is not accurate.
For example, the 未然形 ending -a is also bound,
but we do not call it 係り結び.

GG5: 【国文法】 a linked form; (a) bound ending.
ルミナス: 〔言〕 postpositional particle-verb agreement in literary Japanese [U]　★説明的な訳.

The original was rather inadequate, and your proposed correction is welcome. I like to lead with shorter glosses, and I think this succinct explanation gets to the point. With "verb agreement" there's no need to say conjugation specifically.

@@ -16 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>correlation between binding particles and sentence-final conjugations in Literary Japanese</gloss>
+<gloss>linked form</gloss>
+<gloss>bound ending</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">postpositional particle-verb agreement in literary Japanese</gloss>

"conjugations" is more accurate

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>correlation between binding particles and sentence-final endings in Literary Japanese</gloss>
+<gloss>correlation between binding particles and sentence-final conjugations in Literary Japanese</gloss>

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

G n-grams:
右に出る	100497
右にでる	  8387

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>右にでる</keb>

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v1;</pos>

koj, daijr/s, nikk
百舌勘定	No matches

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

Kanji Haitani list

Adding yoji tagAdding yoji tag
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&yoji;</misc>

Entry created

OK

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ジャボチカバ
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/植物の進化
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microphylls_and_megaphylls

I looked some more into it, 小葉 has "small leaf" meaning on daijisen/daijiten/daijirin, so that should also be relevant I think (although currently missing on JMDict)
Also in the first reference link above from wikipedia they are used with 系: 日本では小葉系と大葉系と中葉系（大実の成る系統はアッスーと名付けられている）に分類され流通している。

From the second link: 一般的には葉と言えば「大葉（en:megaphylls）」であり and 大葉（いわゆる「葉」）の葉脈の枝分かれパターンは、2分岐が網目状になったものが起源である可能性がある。
So it seems to be more about the fact that 大葉(Megaphylls) have a complex network of veins, as it explains in the third link
So the j-j dictionary entries might be not up to date on this

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>megaphylls</gloss>

大辞泉 seems to be alone with that sense.

Funny that no other reference has it. WWW hits and images are all for perilla leaves.

@@ -13 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>large leaf</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1311720">紫蘇</xref>
+<gloss>beefsteak plant</gloss>
+<gloss>perilla</gloss>
@@ -18,3 +20 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1311720">紫蘇</xref>
-<gloss>beefsteak plant</gloss>
-<gloss>perilla</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">large leaf</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/大葉-450531

missing definition for "大きな葉。"

@@ -9,0 +10,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>large leaf</gloss>
+</sense>

Entry created

@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>Mohorovicic discontinuity</gloss>
+<gloss>Mohorovičić discontinuity</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>

Entry created

I don't think it's an adverb.

@@ -23,2 +23 @@
-<pos>&adv;</pos>
-<gloss>post-meridiem</gloss>
+<gloss>post meridiem</gloss>

As commented in 2858314, we don't say these are abbreviations.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -25 +23,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -32 +29,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -38 +34,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -43 +38,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -49 +43,0 @@
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>

Currently there's only an [abbr] tag on the first sense. Adding it to the other five.

Maybe [adv] could be dropped from sense 02, but smk has this example that I suppose is adverbial: 「1:30p.m.上映」

Changing the field tag on sense 01 from [comp] to to [internet]. Doesn't sound like a computing term.
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/プライベート・メッセージ

@@ -17 +17 @@
-<field>&comp;</field>
+<field>&internet;</field>
@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -30,0 +32 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -35,0 +38 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -39,0 +43 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -44,0 +49 @@
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

Reformat initialsms
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+<reb>ピー・エム</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

"n-t" conversion to "n,adv", etc.

@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>mass Ise pilgrimage (intermittently during the Edo period)</gloss>
+<gloss>mass Ise pilgrimage (occurring intermittently during the Edo period)</gloss>

Trimming

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>mass Ise pilgrimage (that occurred intermittently during the Edo period)</gloss>
+<gloss>mass Ise pilgrimage (intermittently during the Edo period)</gloss>

brit
http://eos.kokugakuin.ac.jp/modules/xwords/entry.php?entryID=1154

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>pilgrimage to Ise</gloss>
+<gloss>mass Ise pilgrimage (that occurred intermittently during the Edo period)</gloss>

"n-t" conversion to "n,adv", etc.

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -18 +19 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

nikk, some google hits

Francis's suggestion

乳袋	225
ちぶくろ	4953 <- appears to be mostly sense 2.
ちちぶくろ	< 20

This is mixing up two distinct terms. 乳袋/ちぶくろ is in all the kokugos and just means breast.
The slang term appears to be 乳袋/ちちぶくろ. I'll remove the edits and propose a new entry for that one.

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ちちぶくろ</reb>
+<reb>ちぶくろ</reb>
@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<misc>&vulg;</misc>
@@ -14 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>milk bags</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

dic.pixiv.net/a/乳袋

to be even more specific: otaku speech requiring that the clothing fits the bottom boob "boob sock" style (vs. forming a hollow/tent)

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ちぶくろ</reb>
+<reb>ちちぶくろ</reb>
@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&vulg;</misc>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>milk bags</gloss>

Daijr

daijs

"n-t" conversion to "n,adv", etc.

@@ -11 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>
@@ -18 +19,2 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv;</pos>

Seems fine.

Re-submitting this per Stuart's instructions.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1579110">今日・1</xref>
+<s_inf>emphatic; used in Japanese theater</s_inf>
@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">used in theater (kyogen, noh song, kabuki) when emphasizing</gloss>
@@ -20 +18,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1579110">今日・2</xref>

@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1579110">今日</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1579110">今日・1</xref>
@@ -19,0 +19,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1579110">今日・2</xref>

daijr koj

Saw in kyōgen

"n-t" conversion to "n,adv", etc.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20 +20 @@
-<pos>&n-t;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

GG5 (幾分 entry).

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1220060">幾分・いくぶん・2</xref>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1220060">幾分・いくぶん・1</xref>

GG5

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<misc>&id;</misc>

Hard to trim.

daijs has two entries
右に出る者がない
右に出る (already in jmdict, and also in gg5)
daijr has one 
右に出る者がいない

g ng
右に出る者	27735　 (daijs)
右に出る者は	18688
右に出る者が	3563
右に出る者はない	763
右に出る者がない	464
右に出る者はいない	No matches
右に出る者がいない	No matches
... so daij both have が entries, but は seems more common in the wild. daijs 右に出る entry also has a は example: 「囲碁なら彼の右に出
る者はいない」 . GG5 has several examples in different entries, all with は

I've changed it to the most common surface form, but if we wanted to, this could be four entries, with が instead of は and いない 
instead of ない.
(then again we already have 右に出る by itself, so this should probably be enough).
The note can probably be trimmed.

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>右に出る者はいない</keb>
+<keb>右に出る者はない</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>右に出るものはいない</keb>
+<keb>右に出るものはない</keb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>みぎにでるものはいない</reb>
+<reb>みぎにでるものはない</reb>
@@ -16,2 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>to be second to none</gloss>
-<gloss>to be in a league of one's own</gloss>
+<s_inf>from the Chinese custom where the rightmost seat was the seat of honor</s_inf>
+<gloss>being second to none</gloss>
+<gloss>being in a league of one's own</gloss>

https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=右に出る

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spikenard
甘松香	336
甘松	1299

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>spikenard</gloss>
+<gloss>spikenard (essential oil, perfume)</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/word/甘松香-2026028
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/甘松香

甘松	1299
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spikenard

Nardostachys jatamansi  or possibly Nardostachys chinensis.

https://kotobank.jp/word/甘松-2026027
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/甘松
https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=甘松

Probably best to cover both in one entry.

http://blog.livedoor.jp/momoyama83/archives/1027113305.html - 生板ショーとかまな板ショーと呼ばれる

https://chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/search?p=生板ショー&type=tag
Q: まな板ショーと生板ショーは違うのでしょうか？
A: 同じだよ～～～～ん！

Q: まな板ショーって具体的に何ですか？
A: ...生板ショーなどとも呼ばれます。...

Original submitter here. The 生- form is how I found it and seems just as valid, its reading notwithstanding.

@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>生板ショー</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -8,0 +12,5 @@
+<re_restr>まな板ショー</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>なまいたショー</reb>
+<re_restr>生板ショー</re_restr>

まな板ショー	1072
なま板ショー	No matches
俎板ショー	29
生板ショー	170
http://www.anusha.com/manaita.htm

The 生板ショー/なま板ショー version of the name is interesting. And why まな板 in the first place?
I think the audience role should be mentioned.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>sex show</gloss>
+<gloss>sex show with audience participation</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_show
a thing in Europe too.

生板 can only be read まないた in a place name in ibaraki

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>生板ショー</keb>
@@ -15 +12 @@
-<gloss>show with a stripper having sex with an audience member</gloss>
+<gloss>sex show</gloss>

https://gendai.ismedia.jp/articles/-/54440

http://peniokun.blog6.fc2.com/blog-entry-4.html

e.g. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjhg/58/5/58_489/_article/-char/ja/
路上活動	2234

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>street activism</gloss>
+<gloss>on-street activities (peforming, collecting, etc.)</gloss>

https://twitter.com/search?q=路上活動&f=live
https://www.facebook.com/events/sakuragichō-station/動物のための路上活動-street-activism-for-animals/209575026309708/

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>2014 Hong Kong protests</gloss>
-<gloss>Umbrella Revolution</gloss>
+<gloss>Umbrella Revolution (protests in Hong Kong in 2014)</gloss>

wiki

Most of the Google images were manga, but I think a few weren't. Anyway, this will do.

google images results for 乳袋 seems to be dominated by this word.

Not a fan of the "m-sl" tag but I guess it fits the bill here?

@@ -13,3 +13,2 @@
-<misc>&sl;</misc>
-<gloss>boob bag style</gloss>
-<gloss>clothing that emphasizes large breasts.</gloss>
+<misc>&m-sl;</misc>
+<gloss>clothing drawn as if were clinging to the breasts of a character</gloss>

https://dic.pixiv.net/a/乳袋

Diverted from an edit of  2707160.  乳テント and 乳カーテン seem related.

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&cards;</field>
@@ -10 +11 @@
-<gloss>misère (in card games)</gloss>
+<gloss>misère</gloss>

I'm not sure about bridge. Better to be general.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>misère (card game variation where the goal is the opposite of what's usual)</gloss>
+<gloss>misère (in card games)</gloss>

It seems to be both according to the goo 
dictionary link, I'm not familiar with the 
word in either language so I decided to 
translate it in accordance with the context in 
which I found it (the last link). It might be 
better to just say something like "misere (in 
bridge, etc.)"

In my experience, a misère is deliberately losing all the tricks in a game like solo or euchre. Is ミゼール so different from that? (I find it hard to grok Japanese card games.)

OK

daijr
延べ竿	4500
のべ竿	6822

I think we can split it into two senses.
The kokugos also have a non-fishing sense.

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>のべ竿</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12 +15,4 @@
-<gloss>jointless fishing rod, usu. with no reel and the line connected to the tip</gloss>
+<gloss>fishing rod with the line connected to the tip (i.e. without a reel or guides)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +20,5 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1579450">三味線</xref>
+<gloss>one-piece shamisen neck</gloss>

Maybe this works. Certainly this seems to be the modern usage.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>jointless fishing rod, usu. with no reel and the line connected to the tip</gloss>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>jointless fishing rod</gloss>

https://fishingjapan.jp/fishing/8315
https://tsurihack.com/1618
http://hisayukitakuko.web.fc2.com/rod.jpg

from the first link:延べ竿とは、ラインを通すガイドの付いていないロッドのことです。
from the second link: 延べ竿(のべ竿)とは、竿先にそのまま糸を結んで使う釣竿の総称。
the third link visually shows the difference, also the other links I've found and the images results from google image all agree that the fact it doesn't use a reel or guide and that the line is linked to the tip is what sets it apart
The second link also go on on saying: 元々は継ぎがなく、竹などのを用いた１本の釣り竿のことを指し、リールを取り付ける部分や、糸を通すガイドはありません。現在では技術の進歩とともに、伸縮できる振出タイプになっています。
Therefore I tend to believe that even the j-j entry from the dictionaries are not up to date with this item

GG5, ルミナス

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>bamboo fishing rod</gloss>
-<gloss>fishing rod that has the line connected to the tip</gloss>
+<gloss>fishing rod made of a single piece of bamboo</gloss>
+<gloss>jointless fishing rod</gloss>

It's been an entry (2196750) since 2007.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/モホロビチッチ不連続面

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1497520">浮世絵</xref>
+<field>&art;</field>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>ukiyo-e depicting a scene from the Tale of Genji</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">ukiyo-e depicting scenes from The Tale of Genji</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1263370">源氏物語</xref>
@@ -13 +14 @@
-<gloss>ukiyo-e depicting a scene from Genji Monogatari</gloss>
+<gloss>ukiyo-e depicting a scene from the Tale of Genji</gloss>

koj daij
http://www.aisf.or.jp/~jaanus/deta/g/genjie.htm

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -10,3 +11,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>なみてんとう</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -16,0 +16,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>なみてんとう</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -19 +21 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1440070">てんとう虫・てんとうむし・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1440070">テントウムシ・2</xref>
@@ -21,0 +24 @@
+<gloss>harlequin ladybird</gloss>
@@ -23 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>harlequin ladybird</gloss>

Daijr, https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ナミテントウ
並天道	<- 20 - in Wikipedia
並瓢虫	< 20 - in Daijirin
ナミテントウ	15613
なみてんとう	203

てんとう虫, etc. is the far more common name of Harmonia axyridis.

@@ -6,0 +7,6 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>並瓢虫</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>なみてんとう</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -8,0 +15 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -11,0 +19 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1440070">てんとう虫・てんとうむし</xref>
@@ -13 +21 @@
-<gloss>(multicolored) Asian lady beetle (Harmonia axyridis)</gloss>
+<gloss>Asian lady beetle (Harmonia axyridis)</gloss>

I think this is a duplicate.

ＫＯＤ追加語彙
ランジェリーパブ	1141
ランジェリー・パブ	58
ランパブ	5804

@@ -8,0 +9,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2848743">ランジェリーパブ</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
@@ -10 +12 @@
-<gloss>bar with lingerie-clad companions for male customers</gloss>
+<gloss>bar with lingerie-clad hostesses</gloss>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/ランパブ
https://kawaii-girl.jp/lingerie_pub/#i-4

Yes, it is. I'll merge them.

duplicate (?) of 1896070

daijisen https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/84682/whats-the-difference-between-伸ばす-and-伸べる

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>to reach for</gloss>
+<gloss>to reach (for)</gloss>
@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>to try one's hand at something new</gloss>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>to try one's hand at (something new)</gloss>

GG5: 手[腕]を伸ばす put out one's hand; reach 《for…》; reach out; reach out one's hand 《for a book》; reach one's hand 《toward》; stretch [hold out] one's arm

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>to put out one's hand</gloss>

nikkoku https://imidas.jp/idiom/detail/X-05-X-19-A-0022.html https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/84682/whats-the-difference-between-伸ばす-and-伸べる

Quiet. Closing.

ランジェリーパブ	1141
ランジェリー・パブ	58
ランパブ	5804
ＫＯＤ追加語彙

Companion to 2848740.