in everyday speech (i.e. off the Internet) I' 
expect they're usually referred to as "xxx 
cookie"

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>browser cookie</gloss>

"cookie" is unambiguous in the context of computing. I think one gloss is enough.

@@ -19,2 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>browser cookie</gloss>
-<gloss>HTTP cookie</gloss>

Strictly speaking, it's not "Internet".

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>Internet cookie</gloss>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<field>&food;</field>
@@ -17 +18,4 @@
-<gloss>cookie (browser-related file sent from a WWW server)</gloss>
+<gloss>cookie</gloss>
+<gloss>Internet cookie</gloss>
+<gloss>browser cookie</gloss>
+<gloss>HTTP cookie</gloss>

I don't think the x-ref is needed.

@@ -9 +8,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1309180">思い遣り</xref>
@@ -12 +10,0 @@
-<gloss>considerateness</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>consideration</gloss>

Hmmmm. Delicacy in English has two senses, but the デリカシー 外来語 doesn't seem to mean 珍味 at all.

@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1309180">思い遣り</xref>
@@ -10,4 +11,1 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1309180">思い遣り</xref>
+<gloss>tact</gloss>

The way the word is used in my family made me realize that it did not mean "delicacy"; when asking for an explanation (that matched what the context suggested), the term 思い遣り was given. EIJIRO also supports this usage.

@@ -11,0 +11,7 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1309180">思い遣り</xref>
+<gloss>considerateness</gloss>
+<gloss>sensitivity</gloss>
+<gloss>thoughtfulness</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, daij

Aligning.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1144790">レギュラー・2</xref>
@@ -13 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>regular</gloss>
+<gloss>regular player (on a team)</gloss>
+<gloss>regular guest (on a TV show)</gloss>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>regular</gloss>

Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>レギュラー・メンバー</reb>

gg5, daij, meikyo

@@ -20,2 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -23,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>consistency</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +24,11 @@
+<gloss>balance</gloss>
+<gloss>composure</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<field>&physics;</field>
+<field>&chem;</field>
+<gloss>stable</gloss>

mk (2s)

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

GG5, daijr/s

[n] should go first.

@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -19,0 +19,2 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -20,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>steadiness</gloss>

rK is prob better than oK

@@ -6,2 +6 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

I don't mind an "oK" on this. When I see 為る live I always think なる. I'll just comment that both Daijirin and 中辞典 have 為る/する.

Saw this discussed in Jim's reddit post:
https://www.reddit.com/r/LearnJapanese/comments/b04h8e/usually_kana_tags_in_wwwjdic_jisho_etc/
person 1: "nothing is "always kanji", and anything that's truly "always kana" wouldn't even have any kanji forms listed...so both of 
those tags would be completely pointless."
person 2: "You mean like する? 100% Kana all the time, most IMEs won't even convert this."
So I checked my Windows 10 standard IME and found that it indeed would not even show 為る for する, nor does my android google keyboard. 
That essentially makes 為る archaic, doesn't it? (alternatively, if we implement the suggested rareKanji, this would perhaps be 
candidate for that)

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>

Agree on "applies to senses 11-14" .

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 引き返す　 │ 210,540 │ 97.5% │
│ 引返す　　 │   2,623 │  1.2% │
│ 引きかえす │     989 │  0.5% │
│ ひきかえす │   1,855 │  0.9% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

引き返す	        210540
引返す	        2623
引きかえす	989

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>

Indeed. Thanks for the correction.

Meikyo Kokugo Jiten, Shinmeikai Kokugo Jiten (5th edition)

Daijirin includes additional senses that don't appear in the other kokugo dictionaries that I'm looking at. Some of those senses are transitive, but I'm guessing that those are the archaic senses mentioned in earlier comments.

@@ -25 +25 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

@@ -30 +30 @@
-<gloss g_type="lit">raising a flag</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">raising a banner</gloss>

旗揚げ	179413
旗揚	2024
旗挙げ	1777
旗挙	449
meikyo has third sense for ②新しく劇団などを組むこと。「─公演」
incidentally I came across it in that usage
https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASP8Z6HZTP8RUCFI00D.html?iref=comtop_ThemeLeftS_02
昭和の初め、近代化を求めて大歌舞伎を飛び出した役者らが旗揚げした劇団「前進座」。
but maybe we can fit it in in sense 2? Gg5 mentions "new party" too

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -25,0 +28 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -26,0 +30 @@
+<gloss g_type="lit">raising a flag</gloss>
@@ -31 +35,4 @@
-<gloss>launching business</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>launching a new group</gloss>
+<gloss>launching a business</gloss>
+<gloss>launching a new party</gloss>

Since it's in those refs.

Daijs and meikyo say this only applies to sense [2]

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────╮
│ 硬骨　　 │ 9,194 │
│ こうこつ │ 1,683 │
│ 鯁骨　　 │     0 │ 🡠 adding (daijs, meikyo, shinmeikai)
╰─ーーーー─┴───────╯

Worth having?

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>鯁骨</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +19 @@
+<stagk>硬骨</stagk>

gg5, prog

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -21,3 +22,3 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>firm</gloss>
-<gloss>uncompromising</gloss>
+<gloss>firmness (of character)</gloss>
+<gloss>backbone</gloss>
+<gloss>unyielding spirit</gloss>

@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1460760">軟骨・1</xref>

nikk daijr
鋼	2163473
刃金	2493

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,0 +26,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>sword steel</gloss>
+<gloss>sword</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>national road</gloss>

座る	1574920
坐る	30892
据わる	10096　
据る	215 in koj, so maybe not io?


首が据わる	4013
首が座る	2276
首が坐る	22

据わる is not rK for sense 3
坐る is more common than 据わる in general for "sitting" but i marked it as rare because it doesn't 
appear to be common in any particular context

@@ -11,3 +10,0 @@
-<keb>坐る</keb>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
@@ -16,0 +14,4 @@
+<keb>坐る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -18 +19 @@
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -40 +41 @@
-<s_inf>esp. 据わる, 据る</s_inf>
+<s_inf>esp. 据わる</s_inf>

GG5, etc.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>contributor</gloss>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>writer</gloss>

https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/9

As with ゼロ才, I don't think しま馬/シマ馬 are candidates for the "rK" tag. 斑馬 probably is.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17 +15,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

縞馬	4462
斑馬	453
しま馬	722
シマ馬	439
シマウマ	151711

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +17 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -12,0 +13,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>シマ馬</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -14,0 +18,7 @@
+<re_restr>縞馬</re_restr>
+<re_restr>斑馬</re_restr>
+<re_restr>しま馬</re_restr>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>シマうま</reb>
+<re_restr>シマ馬</re_restr>
@@ -26 +35,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

daij

@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>住替える</keb>

@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>to change one's residence</gloss>
+<gloss>to move house</gloss>
+<gloss>to move to a new house (or apartment, etc.)</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -28,0 +29,2 @@
+<gloss>to say</gloss>
+<gloss>to tell</gloss>

述べる	2144124
宣べる	399
陳べる	395
と述べた	844874
と宣べた	No matches
と陳べた	23

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<field>&ling;</field>
+<field>&gramm;</field>

@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1629840">女性名詞</xref>
@@ -29 +30 @@
-<gloss>feminine (e.g. noun)</gloss>
+<gloss>feminine noun</gloss>

https://kotobank.jp/itjaword/parosmia

Not sure about the actual reading, it might be おんな.

@@ -24,0 +25,6 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&ling;</field>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>feminine (e.g. noun)</gloss>
+</sense>

gg5, prog, daij, meikyo

Splitting into senses.

@@ -19 +19,30 @@
-<gloss>praising and blaming</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>fluctuation (of prices, interest rates, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>praising and belittling</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>setting out (meals, etc.) and clearing away</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>ebb and flow (of the tide)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>rising and falling (pitch, tone, etc.)</gloss>

mk (2 senses)

@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

daijs
星屑	119576
星くず	45684
星クズ	614

@@ -15 +15,6 @@
-<gloss>countless stars</gloss>
+<gloss>(countless) stars in the night sky</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&astron;</field>
+<gloss>stardust</gloss>

https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/星屑/
https://meaning-
dictionary.com/%E3%80%8C%E6%98%9F%E5%B1%91%E3%80%8D%E3%81%A8%E3%81%AF%EF%BC%9F
%E6%84%8F%E5%91%B3%E3%82%84%E4%BD%BF%E3%81%84%E6%96%B9%E3%82%92%E8%A7%A3%E8%AA
%AC/

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>stardust</gloss>
+<gloss>countless stars</gloss>

800k hits

@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>星くず</keb>

ngrams

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -16 +16,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

prog

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>old-style</gloss>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>old fashioned</gloss>
+<gloss>old-fashioned</gloss>

Bulk update: Adjusting POS details
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -17 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

gg5 etc.

@@ -11,2 +11,4 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
-<gloss>florid</gloss>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>bright red</gloss>
+<gloss>bright scarlet</gloss>

@@ -29,0 +30 @@
+<gloss>to play (the drums)</gloss>

gg5, prog, daij

Added senses.
I don't think we need a separate entry for playing the drums.
I'll reindex the sentences if this is approved.

@@ -20 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>to clap</gloss>
+<gloss>to hit</gloss>
+<gloss>to beat</gloss>
@@ -22 +23,4 @@
-<gloss>to beat</gloss>
+<gloss>to pound</gloss>
+<gloss>to bang</gloss>
+<gloss>to slap</gloss>
+<gloss>to spank</gloss>
@@ -24,0 +29 @@
+<gloss>to clap (one's hands)</gloss>
@@ -29 +34,5 @@
-<gloss>to play drums</gloss>
+<gloss>to attack</gloss>
+<gloss>to bash</gloss>
+<gloss>to criticize</gloss>
+<gloss>to censure</gloss>
+<gloss>to flame (on the Internet)</gloss>
@@ -34,4 +43 @@
-<gloss>to abuse</gloss>
-<gloss>to bash</gloss>
-<gloss>to flame (e.g. on the Internet)</gloss>
-<gloss>to insult</gloss>
+<gloss>to sound out (someone's views)</gloss>
@@ -42,2 +48,2 @@
-<gloss>to consult</gloss>
-<gloss>to sound out</gloss>
+<gloss>to pound (meat or fish)</gloss>
+<gloss>to chop into small pieces</gloss>
@@ -48,2 +54,7 @@
-<gloss>to brag</gloss>
-<gloss>to talk big</gloss>
+<gloss>to beat down the price</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5k;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<s_inf>as ...口を叩く</s_inf>
+<gloss>to talk (big, bad, idly, etc.)</gloss>

in daijs etc.

@@ -10 +10 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

vi seems more likely.

[vi]:    shinmeikai 7e (1st sense only), obunsha 11e, iwakoku 6e, sankoku 7e
[vt,vi]: meikyo 1e & 2e (1st sense only)

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ を談話する │    25 │  1.3% │
│ 　談話する │ 1,883 │ 98.7% │
├─ーーーーー─┼───────┼───────┤
│ を談話し　 │    51 │  0.6% │
│ 　談話し　 │ 8,764 │ 99.4% │
╰─ーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯

Meikyo and gakkoku seems to be outliers here with [vt]

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>

gakkoku meikyo (later edition?)

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

gg5, meikyo

Only the first sense is vs.

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -25 +25,0 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -32 +32 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<field>&ling;</field>

GG5, 中辞典

A bit broader.

@@ -19,2 +19,2 @@
-<gloss>(light-hearted) talk</gloss>
-<gloss>(casual) conversation</gloss>
+<gloss>talk</gloss>
+<gloss>conversation</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +22,12 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>informal expression of opinion</gloss>
+<gloss>off-the-cuff remarks</gloss>
+<gloss>comment</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<gloss>discourse</gloss>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>earth globe (model)</gloss>
+<gloss>Earth globe (model)</gloss>

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>globe (map)</gloss>
+<gloss>earth globe (model)</gloss>
+<gloss>terrestrial globe</gloss>

@@ -28 +28 @@
-<gloss>to change one's clothes</gloss>
+<gloss>to change (one's clothes)</gloss>

gg5

@@ -25,0 +26,2 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

着替える	248260
着換える	538

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

弥る is from the discussion in 1537730. Not recorded in the usual kokugos; I only see it in the kanwas.
The kyūjitai form of 弥 is 彌. Since 弥 is not a kyūjitai, oK -> rK

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

Time this was sorted out. Dropping 航る - it doesn't belong here. Reverting sense 1. Tweaking sense 2.

@@ -25,4 +24,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>航る</keb>
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
-</k_ele>
@@ -36,3 +31,0 @@
-<stagk>渡る</stagk>
-<stagk>渉る</stagk>
-<stagk>航る</stagk>
@@ -40,0 +34 @@
+<s_inf>usu. 渡る or 渉る</s_inf>
@@ -49 +43 @@
-<s_inf>prescriptively 亘る or 亙る, commonly 渡る</s_inf>
+<s_inf>orig. 亘る or 亙る, now commonly 渡る</s_inf>

School essay hand-corrected with red-ink for "misuse" of 渡る for [2]
https://salon.mainichi-kotoba.jp/archives/763
「わたる」は「渡る」を使う場合が多いのですが、範囲や期間をあらわす場合には使えません。

Wiktionary expends a fair amount of effort on the senses:
https://ja.wiktionary.org/wiki/わたる
Seems we're maybe missing a form... 航る for ocean crossings...

Spanning years([2]):
年にわたって	139862	73.0%
年に渡って	44513	23.2%
年に亘って	6444	3.4%
年に渉って	226	0.1%
年に亙って	636	0.3%

Crossing via: (i.e. a bridge)
でわたって	1786	5.8%
で渡って	29095	94.1%
で亘って	0	0.0% <- not used
で渉って	37	0.1%
で亙って	0	0.0% <- not used

Explains that people use "渡る" "incorrectly"
https://wisdom-box.com/confusing/similar/wataru/
一方「亘る」は、「数カ月に亘る仕事（=数カ月に達する仕事）」とか「多方面に亘る知識（=広い範囲の知識）」などと使われます。つまり、「範囲や期間」をイメージするのですね。

Note: the respondent did not call 渡 an error, but did offer 亘:
「2年間に渡って」と「2年に渡って」、どっちが正しいですか？
https://ja.hinative.com/questions/736646
「2年に渡って(亘って)」が正しいです。
なぜなら「2年に渡って(亘って)」は、"2年の間、物事が継続している"という意味だからです。「2年間に渡って」だと、意味が重なってしまいます。


https://www.weblio.jp/content/わたって
亘って
読み方：わたって
ある程度や範囲に及んでいること。「渡る」の限定的な漢字遣い。 <--亘 not used for everything

Suggest a split, with [2] perhaps getting its own entry headed by 亘る (in spite of statistics). 

I've made edits which I don't expect to stand as-is. They reflect my understanding of the situation.

sankoku gives two entries, one for 亘る alone with sense [2], and one for 渡る；渉る, with literally 12 different senses. (wiktionary also has a pile of senses)

Quite coincidentally, this is on Stephen's spreadsheet, so might have gotten a look-over anyway.  I just stumbled into this entry.
https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues/107

The [usu.] comments seem to differ from actual practice.  Primarily it looks like [1] is 渡, and [2] *should be* 亘.  In practice, [2] is [uk], and 渡 is actually the most common kanji form. (I'm assuming sense[2] statistics are reflected in 年にわたって statistics).  Note: the first corrected essay (first ref.) did not replace に渡って with 亘って, but kana わたって. 

If we split off 亘る, this might be a case for making a prescriptive overrule of the statistics, putting 亘る as the top-level kanji, and putting a usage [note=].  Obviously 渡る will necessarily be present on both entries.

Same rationale would apply to our standalone entry に渡って, which should possible by headed as に亘って. (or, we agree the world has changed, stodgy Japanese lit. teachers not withstanding).

What is more useful for us to report as the "best" kanji?  The one  that is most-used, or the one that won't lose marks on an essay? 

航る is limited to sea-crossings, but I tacked it on. Probably needs a sense to handle correctly. There is one example of this use in furigana.info.

@@ -24,0 +25,4 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>航る</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
@@ -31,0 +36,3 @@
+<stagk>渡る</stagk>
+<stagk>渉る</stagk>
+<stagk>航る</stagk>
@@ -34 +40,0 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 渡る or 渉る</s_inf>
@@ -42 +48,2 @@
-<s_inf>usu. 亘る or 亙る</s_inf>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<s_inf>prescriptively 亘る or 亙る, commonly 渡る</s_inf>

ngrams

渡る	1972118
亘る	76680
渉る	8520
亙る	7792
弥る	29

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog, daij

Splitting into senses. The refs only have two but I think this is clearer.

@@ -17,0 +18,16 @@
+<gloss>movement (of the body)</gloss>
+<gloss>action</gloss>
+<gloss>motion</gloss>
+<gloss>gesture</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>bearing</gloss>
+<gloss>carriage</gloss>
+<gloss>behaviour</gloss>
+<gloss>behavior</gloss>
+<gloss>demeanour</gloss>
+<gloss>demeanor</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20,10 +36,4 @@
-<gloss>action</gloss>
-<gloss>movements</gloss>
-<gloss>motions</gloss>
-<gloss>bearing</gloss>
-<gloss>behaviour</gloss>
-<gloss>behavior</gloss>
-<gloss>execution</gloss>
-<gloss>actuation</gloss>
-<gloss>operation</gloss>
-<gloss>manners</gloss>
+<gloss>operation (of a machine, software, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>running</gloss>
+<gloss>working</gloss>
+<gloss>functioning</gloss>

meikyo (2 senses, only 2nd is vs)

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

Don't need that xref.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1280560">硬骨・1</xref>
+<field>&anat;</field>

Should sense 1 be anat?

@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<field>&food;</field>
@@ -24 +25 @@
-<gloss>(dish of) gristle (usu. of chicken, deep-fried)</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">(dish of) gristle (usu. of chicken, deep-fried)</gloss>

google images
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/軟骨#食材としての軟骨

No other dictionary splits, but I think something like this might be helpful.

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -21,0 +21,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>nankotsu</gloss>
+<gloss>(dish of) gristle (usu. of chicken, deep-fried)</gloss>
+</sense>

A particularly amusing and relevant anecdote from twitter (both on [dated] and on 乳母車 -> ビーカー):
俺「今日さ、乳母車(うばぐるま)見に行こっか？」
奏乃「いや、いつの時代の人よ！」
ってな事で、今日は奏乃ちゃんとベビーカーを見に行ってきました
...
https://twitter.com/yuuma_ppp/status/1447514698962722816

This backs up that it's both readily understood, and dated.

If you search for "baby carriage", which is also maybe dated in English but not quite as much as 乳母車 in Japanese , you won't find anything but this entry.

I'd rather not add "baby carriage" to the ベビーカー entry, but this at least tells people what to use instead of this dated term (if it doesn't occur to them to search for "stroller").

Based on google image results, it looks like fashionable wicker strollers (乳母車) may be making a small comeback in Japan.

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1119840">ベビーカー</xref>

OK

@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf38</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>spec2</ke_pri>
@@ -15,3 +11,0 @@
-<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf38</re_pri>
-<re_pri>spec2</re_pri>

乳母車	67613
うば車	3366

native 60 y o informer 今は絶対言わない

OK to remove freq tags?

@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<misc>&dated;</misc>

gg5
発癌性	19447
発がん性	66537
発ガン性	64804

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>発癌性</keb>
+<keb>発がん性</keb>
@@ -8 +8,4 @@
-<keb>発がん性</keb>
+<keb>発ガン性</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>発癌性</keb>
@@ -15,2 +18,3 @@
-<gloss>carcinogenic</gloss>
-<gloss>cancer causing</gloss>
+<field>&med;</field>
+<gloss>carcinogenicity</gloss>
+<gloss>cancer-causing quality</gloss>

All 3 sentences are for sense 3.

gg5, daij

@@ -16,2 +16,8 @@
-<gloss>text</gloss>
-<gloss>script</gloss>
+<gloss>main text</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>original text</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18,0 +25 @@
+<gloss>this volume</gloss>

gg5

I think we should lead with the intransitive glosses.

@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+<gloss>to be needed</gloss>
+<gloss>to be necessary</gloss>
+<gloss>to be required</gloss>
+<gloss>to be wanted</gloss>
@@ -22,2 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>to be needed</gloss>
-<gloss>to be wanted</gloss>

Quiet. Closing.

This has been hanging around. I'm adding both gloss styles (as both can be found in examples), approving it (to trim the queue) and reopening it to allow further discussion )if any.)

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>to need</gloss>
+<gloss>to want</gloss>

I've only skimmed the discussion but personally I still think "wanting" is better and more helpful than the original "wanted". As Jim and Alan seem content with this version as well, I think it's time to let this rest.

Apologies but I must insist that, for the reasons previously listed, it is the worst set out of the three.
I have thus far tried, without apparent success, to focus on the alternative glosses' merits. 
However, I think this point can also be made by trying to find the current gloss' merits instead.

For example, I once again bring up this: Assume all three candidates(wanting, want, wanted ) are all equally valid in regards to semantics and syntax and then try to translate a few sentences with ほしい using each of them - I think you will agree that the translations with the current gloss sound significantly more awkward than either of the rest.
This prompts the question: if they are all equally meritorious but 'wanting' has the singular demerit of being the most unnatural, what is it that makes it the most suitable choice over the others, which harbour no such fault?

Thanks for the discussion. Short of having extensive information about the use of the term in context (as in Makino and Tsutsui) we really have no alternative but to have a small set of succinct glosses. I'm comfortable with the current set.

I would like to provide some counterpoints.

On case alternation other than 欲しい, etc.
The translative を does not qualify, it is used specifically with intransitive motion verbs to mark a path traversed - it is semantically distinct from accusative を. Here we have a particle taking upon another function that is not present elsewhere; with 欲しい, what is being proposed is that a particle suddenly takes the function of another particle for seemingly no reason. 
Translative and accusative を have much better parallels in locative and dative に.
What happens with the (ら)れる・できる potential forms is much more similar, but it can still be inferred from their historical usage and etymology that they were originally structured with が over that which is possible to be acted upon, and the actor with に - they do not originally take objects and I think it a mistake to call the が格 an object.

On transitivity, semantics and syntax.
"Fish is wanted" and "I want fish" are semantically equivalent. You seem to be conflating semantic/thematic roles and syntactic roles, they are related but not the same; across those two sentences the thematic roles remain the same, it is only the syntactic roles that change in regards to who is the subject.
That 欲しい feels transitive, I suspect comes from it having two thematic roles that you would expect of a transitive verb: stimulus and experiencer.
In the two sentences above, the fish is the stimulus and I/me is the experiencer; in European languages, we commonly have the experiencer as the subject and the stimulus as the object of a transitive verb, that is the case of the english 'want' - but Japanese does not do this, it has the stimulus as the nominative resulting in an intransitive word while the experiencer is either omitted, topicalised, or marked by the dative.

As for the case alternation in 欲しい、嫌い and 好き.
I advocate for disregarding this entirely. Though you can occasionally find someone who uses を欲しい most do not. Acceptability tests also consistently rank the use of accusatives with those adjectives lower than the standard nominative; and if you go asking about you will find someone who opposes those structures after not too long - particularly so for を欲しい - but I do not think you could find someone who considers the usual が as ungrammatical.
Those uses are an anomaly and should be held to be an anomaly, the grammar of adjectives does not license their existence.

Lastly, が as a grammatical object.
It is unfalsifiable. Japanese lacks things such as number and gender agreement on predicates, which deprives us of any features we could use to determine what is and is not the subject. The only recourse we have is the が格.
So, you could say that in that one case it does indeed represent the object - but you cannot prove it and neither can I disprove you.
However, if we say that it becomes the object, then that becomes a peculiar exception to the grammar: we have essentially created a new rule. Similarly, we would need another one that says that に marks the subject whenever it is used every blue moon or so.
I argue, that since neither can be proven nor disproven, we take it to always be the subject and choose the gloss accordingly as that reduces the number of rules and exceptions we have to work with, making the process more consistent and eliminating potential confusion by the reader: if all else is equal, the simpler alternative should be better.

Hasegawa, Y. (2014). Japanese: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Schaanning, J. G. (2019). Case-alternation with Japanese adjectives: A cognitive transitive perspective (Master's thesis).

To throw in my two cents:

From a syntax perspective, in most situations in Japanese, the case marker corresponds to the grammatical function (e.g., nominative が marks the subject, accusative を marks the direct object). But I agree with the view that 欲しい (along with 好き and others) is an exception where the nominative case marker が actually indicates the direct object (Hasegawa 2014). 

For what it's worth, other examples of such "case alternation" occur with potential verbs, where the direct object can be marked with either が or を, and with motion verbs, where the location of motion--not the direct object--is marked with を.

From a cognitive perspective, I would argue that 欲しい *feels* transitive, so I agree with Marcus's 2021 comment that it should have an active gloss. This mainly a feeling from personal experience, as I don't feel that the glosses "wanted"/"want-able"/"desirable" accurately convey the semantics of 欲しい compared to the more transitive "want". 

If I say 肉がほしい, I mean "I want fish", and not "Fish is wanted" (which is semantically incorrect, as the want-er is definitely the speaker). In my interpretation, this is a sentence whose subject is not directly referenced and whose predicate ほしい acts on a direct object 肉 with the case marker が. One could argue for the interpretation "Fish is wanted (by me)", but this feels stilted to me.

There are also plenty of examples in both literature and spontaneous speech where native speakers replace が with the "nonstandard" を when using 欲しい, which may suggest a similar stance that 欲しい is an transitive predicate. For instance, Murakami in his novel, The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle (1994): 「十分だけでいいから時間を欲しいの。」(see Schaanning 2019 for more examples).

So I'm in favor of "want" or "wanting" rather than "wanted" for the glosses. I see the potential value in using "wanted" as a gloss since it's easier to explain to a learner why 欲しい takes the case marker が and makes POS alignment between Japanese and English easier, but I think it's less faithful to how 欲しい is used and perceived. 

All told, there is no definitive solution to this: Hasegawa admits, "At one time, I [...] equated nominative [が] with subject, but I am now convinced that accepting a nominative-marked direct object is more appropriate [...] The reader can likewise select either stance because both are equally persuasive and equally problematic."

Non, you have recently submitted some very good and thoughtful suggestions to several entries, and I hope that you will continue to contribute to jmdict. If our editors do not wish to spend more time considering this entry, then that's the end of the discussion. Please bear in mind that we're all volunteers, that engaging in arguments can be very taxing on the time and energy of others, and that the happiness of our long-time contributors is more important than any particular entry.

Once more, apologies, I am fully aware that this must be a nuisance but I cannot agree with the decision to close this as none of the points I made were rebuked nor the question I raised answered.
As it stands, the decision to reject 2308129 seems to be one without any objective backing as the translation criteria I have brought up now and previously against the current glosses is the same one that the very editor who closed it has just used as support for minor alterations to the proposed での entry.

So, I again ask: translate any sentence with 'want', then do the same with 'wanting'; disregard 'wanted' altogether if you wish to.
食べ物が欲しい = I want food
食べ物が欲しい = I (am) wanting food?
I think that which is the most natural translation is evident. But if so, what is it that makes the latter a better choice over the former?

Thanks for the discussion. Short of having extensive information about the use of the term in context (as in Makino and Tsutsui) we really have no alternative but to have a small set of succinct glosses. I'm comfortable with the current set.

I would like to provide some counterpoints.

On case alternation other than 欲しい, etc.
The translative を does not qualify, it is used specifically with intransitive motion verbs to mark a path traversed - it is semantically distinct from accusative を. Here we have a particle taking upon another function that is not present elsewhere; with 欲しい, what is being proposed is that a particle suddenly takes the function of another particle for seemingly no reason. 
Translative and accusative を have much better parallels in locative and dative に.
What happens with the (ら)れる・できる potential forms is much more similar, but it can still be inferred from their historical usage and etymology that they were originally structured with が over that which is possible to be acted upon, and the actor with に - they do not originally take objects and I think it a mistake to call the が格 an object.

On transitivity, semantics and syntax.
"Fish is wanted" and "I want fish" are semantically equivalent. You seem to be conflating semantic/thematic roles and syntactic roles, they are related but not the same; across those two sentences the thematic roles remain the same, it is only the syntactic roles that change in regards to who is the subject.
That 欲しい feels transitive, I suspect comes from it having two thematic roles that you would expect of a transitive verb: stimulus and experiencer.
In the two sentences above, the fish is the stimulus and I/me is the experiencer; in European languages, we commonly have the experiencer as the subject and the stimulus as the object of a transitive verb, that is the case of the english 'want' - but Japanese does not do this, it has the stimulus as the nominative resulting in an intransitive word while the experiencer is either omitted, topicalised, or marked by the dative.

As for the case alternation in 欲しい、嫌い and 好き.
I advocate for disregarding this entirely. Though you can occasionally find someone who uses を欲しい most do not. Acceptability tests also consistently rank the use of accusatives with those adjectives lower than the standard nominative; and if you go asking about you will find someone who opposes those structures after not too long - particularly so for を欲しい - but I do not think you could find someone who considers the usual が as ungrammatical.
Those uses are an anomaly and should be held to be an anomaly, the grammar of adjectives does not license their existence.

Lastly, が as a grammatical object.
It is unfalsifiable. Japanese lacks things such as number and gender agreement on predicates, which deprives us of any features we could use to determine what is and is not the subject. The only recourse we have is the が格.
So, you could say that in that one case it does indeed represent the object - but you cannot prove it and neither can I disprove you.
However, if we say that it becomes the object, then that becomes a peculiar exception to the grammar: we have essentially created a new rule. Similarly, we would need another one that says that に marks the subject whenever it is used every blue moon or so.
I argue, that since neither can be proven nor disproven, we take it to always be the subject and choose the gloss accordingly as that reduces the number of rules and exceptions we have to work with, making the process more consistent and eliminating potential confusion by the reader: if all else is equal, the simpler alternative should be better.

Hasegawa, Y. (2014). Japanese: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Schaanning, J. G. (2019). Case-alternation with Japanese adjectives: A cognitive transitive perspective (Master's thesis).

To throw in my two cents:

From a syntax perspective, in most situations in Japanese, the case marker corresponds to the grammatical function (e.g., nominative が marks the subject, accusative を marks the direct object). But I agree with the view that 欲しい (along with 好き and others) is an exception where the nominative case marker が actually indicates the direct object (Hasegawa 2014). 

For what it's worth, other examples of such "case alternation" occur with potential verbs, where the direct object can be marked with either が or を, and with motion verbs, where the location of motion--not the direct object--is marked with を.

From a cognitive perspective, I would argue that 欲しい *feels* transitive, so I agree with Marcus's 2021 comment that it should have an active gloss. This mainly a feeling from personal experience, as I don't feel that the glosses "wanted"/"want-able"/"desirable" accurately convey the semantics of 欲しい compared to the more transitive "want". 

If I say 肉がほしい, I mean "I want fish", and not "Fish is wanted" (which is semantically incorrect, as the want-er is definitely the speaker). In my interpretation, this is a sentence whose subject is not directly referenced and whose predicate ほしい acts on a direct object 肉 with the case marker が. One could argue for the interpretation "Fish is wanted (by me)", but this feels stilted to me.

There are also plenty of examples in both literature and spontaneous speech where native speakers replace が with the "nonstandard" を when using 欲しい, which may suggest a similar stance that 欲しい is an transitive predicate. For instance, Murakami in his novel, The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle (1994): 「十分だけでいいから時間を欲しいの。」(see Schaanning 2019 for more examples).

So I'm in favor of "want" or "wanting" rather than "wanted" for the glosses. I see the potential value in using "wanted" as a gloss since it's easier to explain to a learner why 欲しい takes the case marker が and makes POS alignment between Japanese and English easier, but I think it's less faithful to how 欲しい is used and perceived. 

All told, there is no definitive solution to this: Hasegawa admits, "At one time, I [...] equated nominative [が] with subject, but I am now convinced that accepting a nominative-marked direct object is more appropriate [...] The reader can likewise select either stance because both are equally persuasive and equally problematic."

Probably enough now. People can read the comments.

I don't think "express a desire" is ideal - I would read it as somebody explicitly saying they want something, when that's not what this 
means - and "to display want" sounds a little unnatural to me. "to indicate" also sounds very intentional and while it can be, it 
certainly doesn't have to be. It also sounds like the "wish" is being pointed out quite clearly when this is more about 

私 being the subject is rare but when it is, the context is about somebody else reacting  e.g. by noticing the speaker's feelings and 
buying something for them. e.g. google results for "私が欲しがって" (all from the first page): 
"空港で私が欲しがってたらきゃんちが買ってくれたお魚シート♪( ´θ｀)ノ"
" “私が欲しがってた バスの降車ボタン 娘が見つけて ガチャってきてくれたよ"
"友達以上恋人未満の彼から、私が欲しがってたアロマセットをプレゼントしてもらいました。"
"夫「ガレージにきて」私「うん」→私が欲しがってた新品のバイクがドーンと置いてあった！"

daijr: ほしいと思う。ほしそうなようすをする。
I think "appear to" (ようす sense 2: "look; appearance") and "seem to" work the best fit here.

@@ -20,2 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>to express a desire</gloss>
-<gloss>to display want</gloss>
+<gloss>to appear to want to have (something)</gloss>
+<gloss>to obviously want</gloss>
+<gloss>to seem to want</gloss>

ルミナス:
父は僕がいつも欲しがっていた自転車を買ってくれた My father bought me the bicycle (which) I had wanted for a long time.
その子はアイスクリームを泣いて欲しがった The child cried for ice cream.
GG5 (-がる)
(1) 〔…という感情･感覚を表す〕
(2) 〔…したいという気持ちを表す〕

I was going to comment that it seems only to be used in the third person (as in all 11 sentences), but then I saw that ルミナス example which is first person.
I think GG5's explanation is good -  the ...を表す is important, It's more about expressing and stating rather than appearing.
I'll suggest some tweaks.

@@ -20,3 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>to appear to desire</gloss>
-<gloss>to seemingly want</gloss>
-<gloss>to apparently wish for</gloss>
+<gloss>to express a desire</gloss>
+<gloss>to display want</gloss>
+<gloss>to indicate a wish for</gloss>

meikyo
が・る〘接尾〙
…という気持ちや様子を外に見せる意を表す。「悲し─・欲し─・恥ずかし─」「寒む─・痛た─・怖わ─」「新し─・珍し─」「いや─・不思議─」「眠た─・煙た─」「会いた─・知りた─・話した
─」「粋─・通─」「強─・得意─（＝ぶる）」 感情や感覚が外部に現れた様子をいう。「悲しがって（＝悲しそうにして）いる姿が哀れだ」

The point I was making is that it won't be obvious from the original glosses that this is a verb you only use to describe what others appear to want. You 
wouldn't say X私はこれほしがっているよね to say "I want this", and I think this needs to be made clear in all -がる entries.

My problem with this suggestion is that none of the 3 JEs I use has any mention of appear/seemingly, and none of the 11 Tanaka sentences does either. The closest I can see is a また at the end of Koj's explanation. The original glosses are pretty close to the ones in the references. I suspect it's used just as a verbification of 欲しい.

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<field>&ling;</field>
+<xref type="see" seq="2851759">男性名詞</xref>
+<field>&gramm;</field>

OK. It;s in the notes now.

They're wrong though, it's a somewhat similar size (to the 2nd sense book size) but it's different: 165.1 x 234.9 mm (or 17 × 23cm 
according to enwiki)
We could mention it's close to it? But it shouldn't be a gloss

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<gloss>medium octavo</gloss>

ルミナス and 中辞典 have medium octavo.

Stick to ASCII in the glosses.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>medium octavo</gloss>

mk gg5
きくばん【菊判】 [ローマ字](kikuban)
a kiku size 《book》; a 《book》 152×218 mm in size.
►菊判300 ページの本　a 300-page octavo book.

152×218  or 152x218 ?

@@ -12,3 +12,5 @@
-<gloss>A5</gloss>
-<gloss>medium octavo</gloss>
-<gloss>small octavo</gloss>
+<gloss>kiku-ban (paper size; 636x939 mm)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>152x218 mm book size</gloss>

gg5, ngrams

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>steep slope (incline)</gloss>
+<gloss>steep slope</gloss>
+<gloss>steep incline</gloss>

"四六判4切" 2200 googits
"四六判四切"　1840
"四六判4切り" 6
"四六判四切り" 0
"四六判四つ切り"　13
"四六判四つ切" 8


四つ切り	9522
四切	6887
四切り	1230

http://www.tokiwa-pap.co.jp/kaminituite/dansai.html
4切. （よつぎり）

used with other paper sizes too eg "菊判4切"

@@ -7,0 +8,12 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>４切</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>四切</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>４切り</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>四切り</keb>
@@ -17,0 +30,3 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog, daij
御仕着せ	373
お仕着せ	30716

@@ -4,3 +3,0 @@
-<k_ele>
-<keb>御仕着せ</keb>
-</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>御仕着せ</keb>
@@ -19,2 +19,8 @@
-<gloss>uniforms supplied to employees</gloss>
-<gloss>an allotment</gloss>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>uniforms provided for workers (by the employer)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<gloss>something forced upon one</gloss>
+<gloss>something imposed on one</gloss>

Aligning.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>maternal and child health notebook</gloss>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>mother and child health notebook</gloss>

GG5

*health*, elab

@@ -12,1 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>maternity record book</gloss>
+<gloss>maternity health record book</gloss>
+<gloss>mother and child health notebook</gloss>

中辞典: 杜の都仙台 the tree-clad city of Sendai.

杜の都	138824
森の都	6613
wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>杜の都</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12 +16 @@
-<gloss>tree-clad town</gloss>
+<gloss>Capital of Trees (nickname for Sendai City)</gloss>

gg5, daij

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<field>&ling;</field>

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss>cooccurrence</gloss>
+<gloss>co-occurrence</gloss>

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>

I think so.

アースクエイク	5860	79.4%
アースクエーク	128	1.7%
アースクェイク	1193	16.2%
アースクウェイク	204	2.8%
アースクウェーク	0	0.0%
アースクェーク	0	0.0%

okay as sk?

@@ -8,0 +9,8 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アースクェイク</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>アースクウェイク</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

I think we can drop アースクウェイク and アースクェイク. They're not in the refs.

@@ -8,3 +7,0 @@
-<reb>アースクェイク</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
@@ -12,3 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>アースクウェイク</reb>
@@ -18,0 +13 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>

in daij


アースクエイク	5860
アースクエーク	128
アースクェイク	1193
アースクウェイク	204

地震	13299433

more commonly as xref
could maybe be obsc-tagged

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>アースクエーク</reb>
+<reb>アースクェイク</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>アースクェイク</reb>
+<reb>アースクエーク</reb>
@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1421210">地震</xref>

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>to move (to a another area, country, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to move (to another area, country, etc.)</gloss>

daijs, koj

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>to change one's place of residence</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to move (to a another area, country, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -14 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>to move</gloss>

eij, prog

@@ -13,1 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>to move house</gloss>
+<gloss>to migrate</gloss>
+<gloss>to move</gloss>

Wasn't great.

@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+<field>&finc;</field>
+<gloss>results announcement</gloss>

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/bd1d95c6933014799b79d3684730303fdd70eae8
文通費の使い道が話題になっているなか、前衆院議員の丸山穂高氏は１６日、自身のツイッターに令和元年度分の日本維新の会国会議員団の収支報告書を掲載。

this entry seems incorrect or at least incomplete

gg5, daij, shinmeikai

@@ -13,3 +13,4 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
-<gloss>eyesight</gloss>
-<gloss>seeing</gloss>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>seeing (with the naked eye)</gloss>
+<gloss>observation</gloss>
+<gloss>visual inspection</gloss>

Entry created

gg5

@@ -12 +12,8 @@
-<gloss>to be rearranged or transposed</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>to be rearranged</gloss>
+<gloss>to be moved (around)</gloss>
+<gloss>to be changed</gloss>
+<gloss>to be replaced</gloss>
+<gloss>to be exchanged</gloss>
+<gloss>to be switched</gloss>
+<gloss>to be swapped</gloss>

Entry created

キンキラキンな	505
キンキラキンの	4959

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -12 +13 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<misc>&on-mim;</misc>

daijr koj
きんきらきん	2886
キンキラキン	12880

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>キンキラキン</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -7,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -11,0 +16,3 @@
+<gloss>glittery</gloss>
+<gloss>sparkly</gloss>
+<gloss>shiny</gloss>

Entry created

GG5: 〔チョコレートなどとともに売られる小型玩具〕 a candy toy.
Koj: 食品玩具の略。菓子など市販の食品におまけとして付ける玩具。
Meikyo: 〘名〙　菓子などにおまけとして付けられる玩具。

What a hoot. I'm restoring our original.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>Shokugan (食玩), is a trademark of Bandai. Shokugan are small, low priced, high quality, limited release collectibles that originated 30 years ago and became popular in Japan and elsewhere. "Shokugan" is onomatopoeic from the two sounds "shoku" meaning food, and "gan" meaning toy. Some examples of different types of "Shokugan” products are charms/keychains, mini figures, articulated figures, and model kits. Shokugan is typically seen on candy shelves in Japanese supermarkets, but can now be found worldwide providing a small piece of Japan to fans around the world. In many countries and territories, including the United States and parts of Asia, "Shokugan" and/or its derivatives are a registered trademark of Bandai.</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="2237280">食品玩具</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>small toy included with food</gloss>

Looks like most if not all of this text is from Bandai's English website. I wonder if this submission came from a lawyer?
https://shop.bandai.com/bandai-shokugan

> In many countries and territories, including the United States and parts of Asia, "Shokugan" and/or its derivatives are a registered trademark of Bandai.

Japan is notably not included among those countries. This is a dictionary entry for defining the word 食玩 as it is used in Japanese. The proposed edit would be more appropriate for an English-language encyclopedia.

@@ -12,3 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2237280">食品玩具</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>small toy included with food</gloss>
+<gloss>Shokugan (食玩), is a trademark of Bandai. Shokugan are small, low priced, high quality, limited release collectibles that originated 30 years ago and became popular in Japan and elsewhere. "Shokugan" is onomatopoeic from the two sounds "shoku" meaning food, and "gan" meaning toy. Some examples of different types of "Shokugan” products are charms/keychains, mini figures, articulated figures, and model kits. Shokugan is typically seen on candy shelves in Japanese supermarkets, but can now be found worldwide providing a small piece of Japan to fans around the world. In many countries and territories, including the United States and parts of Asia, "Shokugan" and/or its derivatives are a registered trademark of Bandai.</gloss>

daijr: 菓子などにおまけとして付けられる玩具。

The toy itself is free.
景品 x-ref doesn't seem necessary.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1250880">景品・1</xref>
@@ -15 +14 @@
-<gloss>small toy sold with food</gloss>
+<gloss>small toy included with food</gloss>

Bulk update of vi-vt tags from meikyo
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

庇い立て	1149
かばい立て	1144

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>かばい立て</keb>

庇い立て	1149
かばいたて	53
かばいだて	698
Daijr, GG5

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>かばいたて</reb>
+<reb>かばいだて</reb>
@@ -11 +11 @@
-<reb>かばいだて</reb>
+<reb>かばいたて</reb>
@@ -16,2 +16,3 @@
-<gloss>protect</gloss>
-<gloss>defend</gloss>
+<gloss>protecting (someone)</gloss>
+<gloss>defending</gloss>
+<gloss>standing up for</gloss>

@@ -9,0 +10,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かばいだて</reb>
+</r_ele>

I don't think the x-ref adds anything.

@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1536010">問題・1</xref>

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/12f8fe8de62bf7c7a57a21f9870fc1d524071dca
会計検査院は１９年の報告で、住宅ローン減税を活用した人の８割近くが、支払う利息より控除額が大きかったことを問題視し、「必要のない人が住宅ローンを組む動機
付けになっている」と指摘していた。

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Shudder...

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>viewing as a problem</gloss>
@@ -15 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>viewing as a problem</gloss>

@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>viewed as a problem</gloss>
+<gloss>problematizing</gloss>
+<gloss>viewing as a problem</gloss>

Entry created

This is the official name used across go.jp 
etc.
母子健康手帳 should be aligned w thi

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>maternal and child health notebook</gloss>
@@ -15 +15,0 @@
-<gloss>mother and child health notebook</gloss>

synch

@@ -14,1 +14,2 @@
-<gloss>maternal and child health handbook</gloss>
+<gloss>maternity health record book</gloss>
+<gloss>mother and child health notebook</gloss>

GG5 daijr koj

abbr, full

@@ -12,0 +12,2 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1783050">母子健康手帳</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>

Entry created

雰囲気を壊す	12044
ふんいきをこわす	No matches
ふいんきをこわす	No matches

We have the odd-ball reading on the 雰囲気 entry. I think that's enough.

@@ -9,4 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ふいんきをこわす</reb>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ふいんきをこわす</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+<pos>&v5s;</pos>

Entry created

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anal_hygiene

Not used on the buttocks, for sure.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>small block of wood used to clean one's buttocks after defecating</gloss>
+<gloss>small block of wood used to clean one's anus after defecating</gloss>

Would you really be using it to clean your 
buttocks rather than your anus?

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Entry created

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>to be in the process being ...</gloss>
+<gloss>to be in the process of being ...</gloss>

There was no indication that it's passive.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&v5r-i;</pos>
@@ -14 +15 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2269820">為れる・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2269820">される・1</xref>
@@ -16 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>to be in the process of doing</gloss>
+<s_inf>after a noun that takes する</s_inf>
+<gloss>to be in the process being ...</gloss>

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

素うどん	14246
素饂飩	123

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>udon noodles in broth (no trimmings)</gloss>
+<field>&food;</field>
+<gloss>udon noodles without trimmings</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">blue-colored deity depicted with two, four or six arms; originally associated with esoteric Buddhism, thought to bring sickness; revered as part of kōshin-machi beliefs during the Edo period</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">blue-skinned deity depicted with two, four or six arms; originally associated with esoteric Buddhism, thought to bring sickness; revered as part of kōshin-machi beliefs during the Edo period</gloss>

daijr

I want it to be noted I didn't include half the things mentioned in daijr

@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1528230">密教</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2428140">庚申待</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2428140">庚申待</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2428140">庚申待</xref>
@@ -17,0 +22 @@
+<gloss g_type="expl">blue-colored deity depicted with two, four or six arms; originally associated with esoteric Buddhism, thought to bring sickness; revered as part of kōshin-machi beliefs during the Edo period</gloss>

see 庚申待

@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>Shōmen Kongō</gloss>

KOD

This gets around it.

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>moon globe</gloss>
+<gloss>lunar globe</gloss>
+<gloss>globe of the moon</gloss>

should "moon" be capitalized?

Entry created

X-ref isn't really appropriate. んと欲す doesn't include する.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2537250">しようとする</xref>

Not a conjunction.

@@ -11 +11 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -13 +13 @@
-<s_inf>connects to ない stem</s_inf>
+<s_inf>after the ない stem of a verb</s_inf>
@@ -15 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>to aspire to</gloss>
+<gloss>to try to</gloss>
+<gloss>to want to</gloss>

んと欲す	7174
んとほっす	166
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1399286413

It seems ok, and is used quite a bit in formal old-fashioned writing. I don't think it's 
archaic in our sense.

@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-<misc>&arch;</misc>
@@ -15,0 +15 @@
+<gloss>to aspire to</gloss>

daijs
vt in wadoku

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -15,0 +17,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<gloss>boiling (an unused piece of earthenware) in hot water mixed with rice or flour (to fill any small holes)</gloss>

eij, daijs, dbcls, jst, 日英・英日専門用語辞書,cross

Don't need the odd reading here.

@@ -9,4 +8,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ふいんきびじん</reb>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ふいんきびじん</reb>
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

ngrams
雰囲気美人	1358

http://matome.naver.jp/odai/2140654632136369801
"美人オーラは作れる？！『雰囲気美人』になる方法"
"容姿が飛びぬけて美しいわけではなく、スタイルが飛びぬけていいわけで
もないのに、何となくキレイだな、かわいいな、と感じる女性っていません
か？"
http://girlschannel.net/topics/305120/
"雰囲気美人あるある"
"まじまじ見るとブス"
"ただ服装がおしゃれなだけ"

See 2834341.

@@ -21,3 +21 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1157170">する・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1157170">する・1</xref>
-<s_inf>ksb equiv. of しない</s_inf>
+<s_inf>equiv. to しない in standard Japanese</s_inf>
@@ -24,0 +23,2 @@
+<gloss>does not</gloss>
+<gloss>do not</gloss>
@@ -26,2 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>do not</gloss>
-<gloss>does not</gloss>

@@ -21,2 +21,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1157170">為る・する・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1157170">為る・する・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1157170">する・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1157170">する・1</xref>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/せえ�%B
8%E3%82%93
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail
/q1126541756
"「せえへん」「しいひん」の境界線とは？"
"滋賀だと「しいひん」「できひん」と、～ひんが多用されていま
す。"
"三重県北部ですが、...「せえへん」や「しやん」「しやへん」など
と言います。"
"...「せえへん」は大阪、「しいひん」は京都（サ変動詞の場合は、
「しやへん」から「しいひん」に転じていった)・・・なのですが、
現状では地域も話者も混ぜ混ぜになっています。"
"和歌山出身者ですが和歌山では「しいひん」は使わないような気が
します。「せえへん」しか使ったことがないです。"
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail
/q12129910832
"「〜しやん」とゆうのは大阪弁なんですか？
私は「〜せえへん」と言います。
大阪産まれの大阪育ちですが今まで聞いたことがありません。
最近何人かの友達が言

っているのが耳につきます。
これは大阪弁なのでしょうか？"
"大阪でも使う場面はあると思います。"

Might be worth recording these ksb conjugations of する 
too, since they are irregular.　Didn't include "しやへん" 
because I've never heard it used myself and when I googled 
it, the first hit was for a 高松弁 dic.

I think "mismatched" is too broad.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>marriage between mismatched partners (esp. of marriages where the wife has a higher financial or social status)</gloss>
+<gloss>marriage in which one partner (esp. the wife) has a significantly higher income or social status</gloss>

daijr
俗に，収入や社会的地位などについて格差がある男女による結婚。多くの場合，女性の立場が強い場合について言う。

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>marriage between mismatched partners (esp. in terms of wealth)</gloss>
+<gloss>marriage between mismatched partners (esp. of marriages where the wife has a higher financial or social status)</gloss>

g ng
格差婚	21897
zokugo, chiezo
http://zokugo-dict.com/06ka/kakusakon.htm
A native informant didn't agree it applies to any mismatch (such as looks, etc.), like chiezo says, so I compromised 
and made it "esp. wealth"

daijs
it's not specifically about airports.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>protection measures at ports and airports (against smuggling, disease, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>border control measures (against smuggling, disease, etc.)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>protection measures at ports and airports (against smuggling, disease, etc.) s</gloss>
+<gloss>protection measures at ports and airports (against smuggling, disease, etc.)</gloss>

ＫＯＤ追加語彙: 〔密輸･疫病などに対する〕 containment measures at 「points of entry [ports and airports].

I think this is clearer.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>shoreline protection</gloss>
-<gloss>shoreline operations</gloss>
+<gloss>protection measures at ports and airports (against smuggling, disease, etc.) s</gloss>