I don't think we need more than one gloss for obscure カタカナ語 like this.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<gloss>the opposition</gloss>

We add such cross references when they make sense, but I'm not really seeing how this would be a solution to the problem you're seeing here. It's probably 
better to tag entries that are obscure as [obsc] (or [obs], [arch], [dated]) and let apps and sites use that info + our frequency tags to make reverse 
searches bring up the most relevant entry on top and perhaps hide some others. (jisho.org does not currently hide entries that are tagged obsc from 
reverse searches. If you think they should, it'd be best to take it up with them.)

I've suggested implementing an explicit "more commonly as" type of xref on the Github, which by the way is a better place to discuss topics that concern 
policy than the comment section of an individual entry. 
https://github.com/JMdictProject/JMdictIssues/issues

If you come across any other obscure katakana words you think should have xrefs to more common words with similar meaning or be tagged as [obsc], go ahead 
and edit them.

Thank you for the reactions. I understand the notion of including obscure terms as long as they’re well-documented. However, in that case, 
wouldn’t it be a good idea to try and more actively add cross references if it’s an obscure katakana entry, in order to avoid learner confusion as 
I described in my previous comment? I’m not saying every katakana term has a “Japanese” equivalent; katakana terms are very much Japanese 
themselves and they can have different nuances than their “equivalent”, so a cross reference would not always be in place. But again I’m trying 
to look at it from the perspective of language learning and user friendliness.

It's also in 現代人のカタカナ語辞典 and mentioned 
in daijs' オポジション entry. To try and answer 
Tsuchida's question: we don't add words like 
this unless there's some evidence they're 
being used or appear in some other dictionary 
or work of reference. We don't avoid obscure 
or outdated words if their usage is well-
documented.

More commonly as xref

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1537580">野党</xref>

ルミナス
0 n-grams

It'gets a little use and it's a sub-entry in ルミナス. Best to keep it and tag it as not common.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<misc>&obsc;</misc>
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+<gloss>the opposition</gloss>

Seems OK. The JEs don't split senses.

スタミナ丼	10804
スタミナ焼肉	1395

スタミナ定食	3715
スタミナ焼き	9351
スタミナ肉	926
スタミナレシピ	74890

すた丼	14175
スタ丼	11971
(apparently an abbr for スタミナ丼)


google images for　スタミナ丼　スタミナ定食　[スタミ
ナ　肉]

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/quest
ion_detail/q1023841085
「スタミナ定食」とは、何なのでしょうか。
今まで、なんとなく「肉を炒めるのに、ニンニク使ってるのか
な」
ぐらいの認識だったのですが、先日食べたスタミナ定食は
豚肉と玉ねぎを炒めたもので、ニンニクは使われて
いませんでした。
Answer:普通、スタミナと名の付く料理にはニンニクが不可
欠ですが・・・そのお店はちょっと違うような？？

don't know how to gloss, but there's a 
definitely a meaning to スタミナ that's nowhere 
present in the English word "stamina"

@@ -10 +9,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -13,0 +13,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
+<gloss>stamina-boosting (esp. of meat dishes containing raw egg yolks, garlic, Chinese chives, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/d73d5251d845519d2a84e30c6550dbd1d9f3b372
９月に北九州市立大学のアン・クレシーニ准教授は、黒人を親に持つ女子中学生が学校から三つ編みの数を制限されていることを問題視。マ
イノリティーに対してのイジメで、ブラック校則と問題になった。

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1349070">少数</xref>
@@ -14,0 +16,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>(sexual, ethnic) minority</gloss>
+<gloss>minority group</gloss>
+</sense>

daij, meikyo
引っ込み思案	75946
引込思案	        500

I think we can drop 引込思案.

@@ -8,4 +7,0 @@
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>引込思案</keb>
-<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +17 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>

meikyo's example is 「─の人」 but
引っ込み思案な人	1011
引っ込み思案の人	522

G n-grams:

引っ込み思案	75946
引っ込み思案な	23476
引っ込み思案の	9756

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -20 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf>
@@ -20 +20,0 @@
-<misc>&yoji;</misc>

mk

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

I kind of want to lead with examination here

gg5, prog, meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -21 +22,4 @@
-<gloss>scan (e.g. MRI, PET, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>test</gloss>
+<gloss>check</gloss>
+<gloss>scan (e.g. MRI, PET)</gloss>
+<gloss>audit</gloss>

gg5, prog

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<xref type="ant" seq="1434350">低級</xref>
@@ -21,0 +23,3 @@
+<gloss>high-quality</gloss>
+<gloss>high-end</gloss>
+<gloss>luxury</gloss>
@@ -24 +27,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
@@ -27 +30,2 @@
-<gloss>high rank</gloss>
+<gloss>high-ranking</gloss>
+<gloss>high-level</gloss>

@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -26 +26,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>

adj glosses

@@ -20,2 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>high class</gloss>
-<gloss>high grade</gloss>
+<gloss>high-class</gloss>
+<gloss>high-grade</gloss>
@@ -28 +28 @@
-<gloss>seniority</gloss>
+<gloss>senior</gloss>

koj: キリスト教で、自分の信仰を公に表明すること。
daijs: キリスト教で，自己の信仰を公に言い表すこと。

I really think we're overcomplicating this. The "cultural context" here is universal and I think it can be conveyed with a much simpler gloss.
Added sense.

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>confession (of guilt, crime, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>confession (to a crime, wrongdoing, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -22,2 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>profession</gloss>
-<gloss>declaration</gloss>
@@ -29,2 +27,9 @@
-<gloss>professing one's feelings to someone and asking them to become one's romantic partner (oft. considered a prerequisite to beginning a relationship in earnest)</gloss>
-<gloss>declaring one's love to someone (and asking them out)</gloss>
+<gloss>professing one's feelings (to someone one wants to go out with)</gloss>
+<gloss>declaration of love</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<field>&Christn;</field>
+<gloss>profession (of faith)</gloss>

I confess to being a bit tired of this one.
I've adjusted the sntences.

Additionally, in 告白① it doesn't matter who 
you're confessing to, but 告白② has to be 
directed towards the specific person one has 
feelings for. It's really quite something 
specific that I think needs to be separate 
from the general "confession" sense.

https://www.tofugu.com/japan/kokuhaku-love-confessing-japan/
KOKUHAKU: JAPAN'S LOVE CONFESSING CULTURE
... kokuhaku 告白こくはく, literally means "confession", and it is done when a man or a woman declares their love to 
another, and hopes to begin dating that person.
... You may go out with the person a few times or go out on a group date, but your relationship hasn't technically 
started until this love confession, aka kokuhaku, occurs.
https://skdesu.com/en/confess-kokuhaku-tsukiatte-kudasai-request-dating/
The art of declaring or confessing love in Japan is known as Kokuhaku [告白] already in the case of inviting a person to 
go out or date after declaring yourself, if you use Tsukiatte kudasai [付き合ってください].
Kokuhaku [告白] literally means “confession”, and it is done when a man or a woman declare your love to another, and 
hopes to start dating that person soon after. The word can also mean recognition and even confessional.

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40019825078
恋愛における〈告白〉の形成に見る現代日本社会 (unfortunately not available)

https://ir.lib.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/ja/00019550
"恋愛における告白の成功・失敗の規定因"
English title: "Factors influencing success and failure of confessing one's love"
↑
This is a good example why "confessing one's love" doesn't actually work well as a translation. It's not necessarily 
immediately obvious what "success/failure" refers to here with that gloss. How can you fail at confessing your love? If 
somebody told me "I failed at confessing my love" I'd first assume they were saying they just didn't go through with 
it. 告白を失敗

I really think there's a really large cultural context to Japanese 告白 which is something that demands a proper 
explanation and lumping it in with any random confession is doing a disservice to our users who largely are beginner-
level learners. Also this sense is decidedly [vi], which alone is a very good reason to have it separately from the vt 
"confession". 

(kind of irrelevant but there's a very good translation for this sense in Swedish: "fråga chans", except it's only used 
by elementary school kids. https://en.bab.la/dictionary/swedish-english/fråga-chans )

@@ -20 +20 @@
-<gloss>confession (of guilt, love, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>confession (of guilt, crime, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -23,0 +24,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>professing one's feelings to someone and asking them to become one's romantic partner (oft. considered a prerequisite to beginning a relationship in earnest)</gloss>
+<gloss>declaring one's love to someone (and asking them out)</gloss>

prog

gg5 meikyo

@@ -17,0 +18,4 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>annual salary paid to Diet members</gloss>
+</sense>

reverso

Thanks. I'll make it a separate sense.

@@ -22,0 +23,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<gloss>browsing (to a file or folder)</gloss>

re: browse
https://pc-more.fimplex.com/article/windows-file-folder-browse/

it refers to the "browse for file" dialog in windows
ファイルを参照する etc.

gg5, prog

I'm not sure what is meant by the "browsing" gloss.

@@ -20,2 +20 @@
-<gloss>reference</gloss>
-<gloss>bibliographical reference</gloss>
+<gloss>reference (e.g. to a dictionary, passage, footnotes)</gloss>
@@ -23,2 +22 @@
-<gloss>browsing (e.g. when selecting a file to upload on a computer)</gloss>
-<gloss>checking out</gloss>
+<gloss>comparison</gloss>

meikyo

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

I don't think the x-refs to noun entries are appropriate.

@@ -29 +28,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1367830">人使い</xref>
@@ -46 +44,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1264560">言葉遣い</xref>

If there are specific cases or contexts where it's more common than the basic raw ngrams indicate, I think it's fine to 
remove the rK. 

In this case, I think the 気を遣う usage demonstrates it best:

気を遣う	122218
気を使う	315771
気を使わせて	25435
気を遣わせて	13198

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

I don't think 遣う can be described as a "rarely used kanji form" just 使う is significantly more common. Any native speaker will encounter it somewhat frequently. Prog and Wisdom use 
it in several example sentences.
Grouping 遣う with things like 西班牙 and 了る doesn't seem right to me.

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>to use (a thing, method, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to use (a tool, method, etc.)</gloss>

使う	25896185
遣う	157752

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/shido#Noun
https://www.judo-ch.jp/english/dictionary/terms/sidou/

I think this is sufficient.

@@ -29 +29 @@
-<gloss>shido (disciplinary action for a minor infringement of the rules of judo)</gloss>
+<gloss>shido (minor penalty in judo)</gloss>

mk

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

gg5, prog, daij

Only sense 1 is [vs].

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>guidance</gloss>
@@ -20 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>guidance</gloss>
+<gloss>instruction</gloss>
+<gloss>direction</gloss>
@@ -25 +27 @@
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<field>&MA;</field>

gg5

色欲	14850
色慾	427

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>carnal desire</gloss>

I'm going to go ahead and remove the tags for 
now. I don't think having this P-tagged is 
doing our users any favors.

@@ -6,2 +5,0 @@
-<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
-<ke_pri>nf20</ke_pri>
@@ -11,2 +8,0 @@
-<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
-<re_pri>nf20</re_pri>

Couldthe freq tags onthis be down to 
misparsing?

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ 弔い合戦　　　　 │ 13,026 │ 98.3% │
│ 弔合戦　　　　　 │    198 │  1.5% │ - add, sK (iwakoku, jitenon)
│ とむらいがっせん │     24 │  0.2% │
╰─ーーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>弔合戦</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>

I'd leave it. It's not in the other JEs.

@@ -16 +16,2 @@
-<gloss>battle to avenge someone's death</gloss>
+<gloss>fighting to avenge someone's death</gloss>
+<gloss>battle of revenge</gloss>

gg5 meikyo

gg5 also has:
"candidacy in an election by a close relative or associate who vows to carry out the will of a recently deceased 
incumbent."
but it's a headache to reword

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>battle of revenge</gloss>
+<gloss>battle to avenge someone's death</gloss>

gg5, wiki

"cancer-causing" is adjectival.

@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-<gloss>cancer causing</gloss>
@@ -20,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>oncogenesis</gloss>

Thanks. 
Simplified readings

@@ -15,6 +14,0 @@
-<re_restr>発がん</re_restr>
-<re_restr>発癌</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>はつガン</reb>
-<re_restr>発ガン</re_restr>

@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<re_restr>発がん</re_restr>

発癌	70682
発ガン	133764
発がん	129935 ← my pc ime's first suggestion

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>発癌</keb>
+<keb>発がん</keb>
@@ -8,0 +9,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>発癌</keb>
@@ -19,0 +23 @@
+<field>&med;</field>

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/不同意性交等罪#強姦罪と強制性交等罪、不同意性交等罪の違い
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2241

As of this year (2023), Japanese law has a single crime for rape that covers various circumstances. Before that, there was a distinction between "rape involving violence or threat" and "incapacitated rape". According to the kokugos, 暴行 refers to the former category.
In US federal law, the terminology is "by force or threat". Maybe just "by force" is sufficient.

@@ -25,0 +26 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>
@@ -27,2 +28 @@
-<pos>&vt;</pos>
-<gloss>rape</gloss>
+<gloss>rape (by force)</gloss>

I assume the intended nuance from "(violent)" might be similar to the typically-understood distinction between "assault" and "aggravated assault"? Of course the action in question is inherently violent, but we cannot deny that there is nevertheless a significant difference in *character* between the stereotypical "jumped in an alley" scenario versus the (tragically) more common "taken advantage of by someone you trust" scenario... Is there anyone familiar with how these distinctions are drawn in practice in, for example, Japanese law? What an unpleasant topic.

dictionary.com:
rape
unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force ...

A fair point. Possibly the refs Marcus mentioned were making a pont we'd not really attempt in English.

As in 本番運用.

@@ -45 +45 @@
-<gloss>production (environment)</gloss>
+<gloss>production environment</gloss>

https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.ja-jp.214.0.dev_lifecycle.meta/dev_lifecycle/lifecycle_multi_prod.htm

@@ -38,0 +39,7 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="2857396">本番環境</xref>
+<field>&comp;</field>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>production (environment)</gloss>

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>performance (as opposed to practise)</gloss>
+<gloss>performance (as opposed to practice)</gloss>

Quiet, self-approving

gg5

I think we should lead with the intransitive glosses.

@@ -19,0 +20,4 @@
+<gloss>to be needed</gloss>
+<gloss>to be necessary</gloss>
+<gloss>to be required</gloss>
+<gloss>to be wanted</gloss>
@@ -22,2 +25,0 @@
-<gloss>to be needed</gloss>
-<gloss>to be wanted</gloss>

Quiet. Closing.

This has been hanging around. I'm adding both gloss styles (as both can be found in examples), approving it (to trim the queue) and reopening it to allow further discussion )if any.)

@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+<gloss>to need</gloss>
+<gloss>to want</gloss>

I've only skimmed the discussion but personally I still think "wanting" is better and more helpful than the original "wanted". As Jim and Alan seem content with this version as well, I think it's time to let this rest.

Apologies but I must insist that, for the reasons previously listed, it is the worst set out of the three.
I have thus far tried, without apparent success, to focus on the alternative glosses' merits. 
However, I think this point can also be made by trying to find the current gloss' merits instead.

For example, I once again bring up this: Assume all three candidates(wanting, want, wanted ) are all equally valid in regards to semantics and syntax and then try to translate a few sentences with ほしい using each of them - I think you will agree that the translations with the current gloss sound significantly more awkward than either of the rest.
This prompts the question: if they are all equally meritorious but 'wanting' has the singular demerit of being the most unnatural, what is it that makes it the most suitable choice over the others, which harbour no such fault?

Thanks for the discussion. Short of having extensive information about the use of the term in context (as in Makino and Tsutsui) we really have no alternative but to have a small set of succinct glosses. I'm comfortable with the current set.

I would like to provide some counterpoints.

On case alternation other than 欲しい, etc.
The translative を does not qualify, it is used specifically with intransitive motion verbs to mark a path traversed - it is semantically distinct from accusative を. Here we have a particle taking upon another function that is not present elsewhere; with 欲しい, what is being proposed is that a particle suddenly takes the function of another particle for seemingly no reason. 
Translative and accusative を have much better parallels in locative and dative に.
What happens with the (ら)れる・できる potential forms is much more similar, but it can still be inferred from their historical usage and etymology that they were originally structured with が over that which is possible to be acted upon, and the actor with に - they do not originally take objects and I think it a mistake to call the が格 an object.

On transitivity, semantics and syntax.
"Fish is wanted" and "I want fish" are semantically equivalent. You seem to be conflating semantic/thematic roles and syntactic roles, they are related but not the same; across those two sentences the thematic roles remain the same, it is only the syntactic roles that change in regards to who is the subject.
That 欲しい feels transitive, I suspect comes from it having two thematic roles that you would expect of a transitive verb: stimulus and experiencer.
In the two sentences above, the fish is the stimulus and I/me is the experiencer; in European languages, we commonly have the experiencer as the subject and the stimulus as the object of a transitive verb, that is the case of the english 'want' - but Japanese does not do this, it has the stimulus as the nominative resulting in an intransitive word while the experiencer is either omitted, topicalised, or marked by the dative.

As for the case alternation in 欲しい、嫌い and 好き.
I advocate for disregarding this entirely. Though you can occasionally find someone who uses を欲しい most do not. Acceptability tests also consistently rank the use of accusatives with those adjectives lower than the standard nominative; and if you go asking about you will find someone who opposes those structures after not too long - particularly so for を欲しい - but I do not think you could find someone who considers the usual が as ungrammatical.
Those uses are an anomaly and should be held to be an anomaly, the grammar of adjectives does not license their existence.

Lastly, が as a grammatical object.
It is unfalsifiable. Japanese lacks things such as number and gender agreement on predicates, which deprives us of any features we could use to determine what is and is not the subject. The only recourse we have is the が格.
So, you could say that in that one case it does indeed represent the object - but you cannot prove it and neither can I disprove you.
However, if we say that it becomes the object, then that becomes a peculiar exception to the grammar: we have essentially created a new rule. Similarly, we would need another one that says that に marks the subject whenever it is used every blue moon or so.
I argue, that since neither can be proven nor disproven, we take it to always be the subject and choose the gloss accordingly as that reduces the number of rules and exceptions we have to work with, making the process more consistent and eliminating potential confusion by the reader: if all else is equal, the simpler alternative should be better.

Hasegawa, Y. (2014). Japanese: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Schaanning, J. G. (2019). Case-alternation with Japanese adjectives: A cognitive transitive perspective (Master's thesis).

To throw in my two cents:

From a syntax perspective, in most situations in Japanese, the case marker corresponds to the grammatical function (e.g., nominative が marks the subject, accusative を marks the direct object). But I agree with the view that 欲しい (along with 好き and others) is an exception where the nominative case marker が actually indicates the direct object (Hasegawa 2014). 

For what it's worth, other examples of such "case alternation" occur with potential verbs, where the direct object can be marked with either が or を, and with motion verbs, where the location of motion--not the direct object--is marked with を.

From a cognitive perspective, I would argue that 欲しい *feels* transitive, so I agree with Marcus's 2021 comment that it should have an active gloss. This mainly a feeling from personal experience, as I don't feel that the glosses "wanted"/"want-able"/"desirable" accurately convey the semantics of 欲しい compared to the more transitive "want". 

If I say 肉がほしい, I mean "I want fish", and not "Fish is wanted" (which is semantically incorrect, as the want-er is definitely the speaker). In my interpretation, this is a sentence whose subject is not directly referenced and whose predicate ほしい acts on a direct object 肉 with the case marker が. One could argue for the interpretation "Fish is wanted (by me)", but this feels stilted to me.

There are also plenty of examples in both literature and spontaneous speech where native speakers replace が with the "nonstandard" を when using 欲しい, which may suggest a similar stance that 欲しい is an transitive predicate. For instance, Murakami in his novel, The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle (1994): 「十分だけでいいから時間を欲しいの。」(see Schaanning 2019 for more examples).

So I'm in favor of "want" or "wanting" rather than "wanted" for the glosses. I see the potential value in using "wanted" as a gloss since it's easier to explain to a learner why 欲しい takes the case marker が and makes POS alignment between Japanese and English easier, but I think it's less faithful to how 欲しい is used and perceived. 

All told, there is no definitive solution to this: Hasegawa admits, "At one time, I [...] equated nominative [が] with subject, but I am now convinced that accepting a nominative-marked direct object is more appropriate [...] The reader can likewise select either stance because both are equally persuasive and equally problematic."

Non, you have recently submitted some very good and thoughtful suggestions to several entries, and I hope that you will continue to contribute to jmdict. If our editors do not wish to spend more time considering this entry, then that's the end of the discussion. Please bear in mind that we're all volunteers, that engaging in arguments can be very taxing on the time and energy of others, and that the happiness of our long-time contributors is more important than any particular entry.

Once more, apologies, I am fully aware that this must be a nuisance but I cannot agree with the decision to close this as none of the points I made were rebuked nor the question I raised answered.
As it stands, the decision to reject 2308129 seems to be one without any objective backing as the translation criteria I have brought up now and previously against the current glosses is the same one that the very editor who closed it has just used as support for minor alterations to the proposed での entry.

So, I again ask: translate any sentence with 'want', then do the same with 'wanting'; disregard 'wanted' altogether if you wish to.
食べ物が欲しい = I want food
食べ物が欲しい = I (am) wanting food?
I think that which is the most natural translation is evident. But if so, what is it that makes the latter a better choice over the former?

Thanks for the discussion. Short of having extensive information about the use of the term in context (as in Makino and Tsutsui) we really have no alternative but to have a small set of succinct glosses. I'm comfortable with the current set.

I would like to provide some counterpoints.

On case alternation other than 欲しい, etc.
The translative を does not qualify, it is used specifically with intransitive motion verbs to mark a path traversed - it is semantically distinct from accusative を. Here we have a particle taking upon another function that is not present elsewhere; with 欲しい, what is being proposed is that a particle suddenly takes the function of another particle for seemingly no reason. 
Translative and accusative を have much better parallels in locative and dative に.
What happens with the (ら)れる・できる potential forms is much more similar, but it can still be inferred from their historical usage and etymology that they were originally structured with が over that which is possible to be acted upon, and the actor with に - they do not originally take objects and I think it a mistake to call the が格 an object.

On transitivity, semantics and syntax.
"Fish is wanted" and "I want fish" are semantically equivalent. You seem to be conflating semantic/thematic roles and syntactic roles, they are related but not the same; across those two sentences the thematic roles remain the same, it is only the syntactic roles that change in regards to who is the subject.
That 欲しい feels transitive, I suspect comes from it having two thematic roles that you would expect of a transitive verb: stimulus and experiencer.
In the two sentences above, the fish is the stimulus and I/me is the experiencer; in European languages, we commonly have the experiencer as the subject and the stimulus as the object of a transitive verb, that is the case of the english 'want' - but Japanese does not do this, it has the stimulus as the nominative resulting in an intransitive word while the experiencer is either omitted, topicalised, or marked by the dative.

As for the case alternation in 欲しい、嫌い and 好き.
I advocate for disregarding this entirely. Though you can occasionally find someone who uses を欲しい most do not. Acceptability tests also consistently rank the use of accusatives with those adjectives lower than the standard nominative; and if you go asking about you will find someone who opposes those structures after not too long - particularly so for を欲しい - but I do not think you could find someone who considers the usual が as ungrammatical.
Those uses are an anomaly and should be held to be an anomaly, the grammar of adjectives does not license their existence.

Lastly, が as a grammatical object.
It is unfalsifiable. Japanese lacks things such as number and gender agreement on predicates, which deprives us of any features we could use to determine what is and is not the subject. The only recourse we have is the が格.
So, you could say that in that one case it does indeed represent the object - but you cannot prove it and neither can I disprove you.
However, if we say that it becomes the object, then that becomes a peculiar exception to the grammar: we have essentially created a new rule. Similarly, we would need another one that says that に marks the subject whenever it is used every blue moon or so.
I argue, that since neither can be proven nor disproven, we take it to always be the subject and choose the gloss accordingly as that reduces the number of rules and exceptions we have to work with, making the process more consistent and eliminating potential confusion by the reader: if all else is equal, the simpler alternative should be better.

Hasegawa, Y. (2014). Japanese: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Schaanning, J. G. (2019). Case-alternation with Japanese adjectives: A cognitive transitive perspective (Master's thesis).

To throw in my two cents:

From a syntax perspective, in most situations in Japanese, the case marker corresponds to the grammatical function (e.g., nominative が marks the subject, accusative を marks the direct object). But I agree with the view that 欲しい (along with 好き and others) is an exception where the nominative case marker が actually indicates the direct object (Hasegawa 2014). 

For what it's worth, other examples of such "case alternation" occur with potential verbs, where the direct object can be marked with either が or を, and with motion verbs, where the location of motion--not the direct object--is marked with を.

From a cognitive perspective, I would argue that 欲しい *feels* transitive, so I agree with Marcus's 2021 comment that it should have an active gloss. This mainly a feeling from personal experience, as I don't feel that the glosses "wanted"/"want-able"/"desirable" accurately convey the semantics of 欲しい compared to the more transitive "want". 

If I say 肉がほしい, I mean "I want fish", and not "Fish is wanted" (which is semantically incorrect, as the want-er is definitely the speaker). In my interpretation, this is a sentence whose subject is not directly referenced and whose predicate ほしい acts on a direct object 肉 with the case marker が. One could argue for the interpretation "Fish is wanted (by me)", but this feels stilted to me.

There are also plenty of examples in both literature and spontaneous speech where native speakers replace が with the "nonstandard" を when using 欲しい, which may suggest a similar stance that 欲しい is an transitive predicate. For instance, Murakami in his novel, The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle (1994): 「十分だけでいいから時間を欲しいの。」(see Schaanning 2019 for more examples).

So I'm in favor of "want" or "wanting" rather than "wanted" for the glosses. I see the potential value in using "wanted" as a gloss since it's easier to explain to a learner why 欲しい takes the case marker が and makes POS alignment between Japanese and English easier, but I think it's less faithful to how 欲しい is used and perceived. 

All told, there is no definitive solution to this: Hasegawa admits, "At one time, I [...] equated nominative [が] with subject, but I am now convinced that accepting a nominative-marked direct object is more appropriate [...] The reader can likewise select either stance because both are equally persuasive and equally problematic."

来つけている　is in gg5:
come [visit] often; be a ┏regular [frequent] visitor to…
daijs lists it as a synonym for 来慣れる


きつけた店	No matches
来つけた店	No matches

maybe a little obsc but seems real

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>来つける</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -12 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>to call frequently</gloss>
+<gloss>to visit frequently</gloss>
+<gloss>to call on frequently</gloss>

Is there a source for this?

乱入	558418
濫入	61

Merging now deleted entry.

@@ -7,0 +8,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>濫入</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

gg5, prog, ルミナス

@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-<gloss>trespassing</gloss>
@@ -19,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>bursting into</gloss>
@@ -21 +21,2 @@
-<gloss>bursting into</gloss>
+<gloss>breaking into</gloss>
+<gloss>forcing one's way into</gloss>

meikyo

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -18,6 +20,2 @@
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&vs;</pos>
-<gloss>to barge into</gloss>
-<gloss>to burst into</gloss>
-<gloss>to trespass</gloss>
+<gloss>barging into</gloss>
+<gloss>bursting into</gloss>

gg5: blot; spread; run; blur; be blurred

Thank you for the submission!

@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>to blot</gloss>

I was looking for translation for インクが滲む、and "to run/spread" didn't look right.  Then found this site about various issue with fountain pen, and feels "bleed" should be 
added here for this entry.  https://fountainpenlove.com/fountain-pen-education/whats-the-difference-between-ink-feathering-bleeding-and-ghosting/

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<gloss>to bleed</gloss>

djr; prog3e; kenkyu中; tsukuba corpus

Not sure about the gloss for sense 4

Not exactly "usually kana" but Tsukuba corpus, out of 3447 
hits, returns 63% にじむ and 37% 滲む.

@@ -14 +14,9 @@
-<gloss>to run</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to run (of liquid)</gloss>
+<gloss>to spread</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -16 +23,0 @@
-<gloss>to spread</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +25,6 @@
+<gloss>to be blurred</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
@@ -18,0 +32,8 @@
+<gloss>to well up (of tears, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&v5m;</pos>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<misc>&uk;</misc>
+<gloss>to show through (of feelings, emotions, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>to reveal itself</gloss>

The restrictions I just added aren't needed if we hide カッコ良い and かっこ良い.

@@ -33,2 +32,0 @@
-<re_restr>格好いい</re_restr>
-<re_restr>格好良い</re_restr>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -15,0 +17,5 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>格好よい</keb>
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -24,2 +29,0 @@
-<re_restr>カッコ良い</re_restr>
-<re_restr>かっこ良い</re_restr>

かっこういい only applies to 格好いい and 格好良い.

@@ -28,0 +29,2 @@
+<re_restr>格好いい</re_restr>
+<re_restr>格好良い</re_restr>

I assume it means the same.

かっこええ　　111,272

@@ -38,0 +39,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>かっこええ</reb>
+<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>

Dupe.

gg5

淫慾	167
淫欲	6129

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>淫慾</keb>
+<keb>淫欲</keb>
@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<keb>淫欲</keb>
+<keb>淫慾</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>carnal desire</gloss>

gg5, prog, meikyo

@@ -15,0 +16,2 @@
+<misc>&form;</misc>
+<gloss>sexual desire</gloss>

gg5

淫慾	167
淫欲	6129

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>淫慾</keb>
+<keb>淫欲</keb>
@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<keb>淫欲</keb>
+<keb>淫慾</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -14,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>carnal desire</gloss>

詩を歌う	2334
詩を詠う	1152

詩を歌って	1851
詩を詠って	278


詩を歌わ	330
詩を詠わ	46

Maaaybe here, though? But it's still a bit of a stretch, all of these added together. The point of the rK as I see it isn't to say 
"this kanji might as well not have been included in this entry at all, it's completely pointless" but to tell esp. early learners 
that it's quite rare and that they don't need to bother learning it by heart to feel they "know" the word in question, and also to 
provide guidance for reverse lookups. It's not to say they won't ever, in a lifetime of reading Japanese, possibly come across it or 
find reason to use it. Since we do mention it in a note on sense 2, and considering these ngrams, I'm OK with removing it, though.

@@ -15 +14,0 @@
-<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

心を詠った	174
心を歌った	2030
心を唄った	140
心を謳った	54
故郷を詠った	32
故郷を歌った	277
故郷を唄った	No matches
故郷を謳った	No matches
愛を唄った	590
愛を謳った	674
愛を歌った	4023
愛を詠った	137

the daijs example is 故郷の心を-った. daijr is 愛
の美しさ-った

I don't think this shows it rising above being 
a rK.

I think the application of rK has to be 
percentage-based, nothing else makes sense or 
is actually helpful. If it's a lot more common 
for a particular sense than overall, I 
wouldn't tag it as rK though. But how common 
is it for sense 2?

gg5, prog, dajij
美しさを歌った	274
美しさを詠った	51

Do we really want to tag a form with 34k in the ngrams as "rare"? I know it's less than 1% of 歌う's count but the difference is probably a lot 
smaller if you look only at sense 2 usage (詠う doesn't apply to sense 1).

@@ -43,3 +43,3 @@
-<gloss>to sing (one's praises in a poem, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>to compose a poem</gloss>
-<gloss>to recite a poem</gloss>
+<gloss>to sing of (love, beauty, etc.) in a poem</gloss>
+<gloss>to express in the form of a poem</gloss>
+<gloss>to recite (a poem)</gloss>

歌う	4222623
唄う	351406
詠う	34216
謡う	14340
唱う	14235

I don't think 唄う is spec1 worthy

@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>詠う</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -16,4 +19 @@
-<ke_pri>ichi2</ke_pri>
-</k_ele>
-<k_ele>
-<keb>詠う</keb>
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

G n-grams:

化け物	322787
化物	155248
ばけもの	17859
ばけもん	1678
バケモノ	52226
バケモン	9492

@@ -20,0 +21,4 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>バケモノ</reb>
+<re_nokanji/>

not ik

@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>

Probably enough now. People can read the comments.

I don't think "express a desire" is ideal - I would read it as somebody explicitly saying they want something, when that's not what this 
means - and "to display want" sounds a little unnatural to me. "to indicate" also sounds very intentional and while it can be, it 
certainly doesn't have to be. It also sounds like the "wish" is being pointed out quite clearly when this is more about 

私 being the subject is rare but when it is, the context is about somebody else reacting  e.g. by noticing the speaker's feelings and 
buying something for them. e.g. google results for "私が欲しがって" (all from the first page): 
"空港で私が欲しがってたらきゃんちが買ってくれたお魚シート♪( ´θ｀)ノ"
" “私が欲しがってた バスの降車ボタン 娘が見つけて ガチャってきてくれたよ"
"友達以上恋人未満の彼から、私が欲しがってたアロマセットをプレゼントしてもらいました。"
"夫「ガレージにきて」私「うん」→私が欲しがってた新品のバイクがドーンと置いてあった！"

daijr: ほしいと思う。ほしそうなようすをする。
I think "appear to" (ようす sense 2: "look; appearance") and "seem to" work the best fit here.

@@ -20,2 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>to express a desire</gloss>
-<gloss>to display want</gloss>
+<gloss>to appear to want to have (something)</gloss>
+<gloss>to obviously want</gloss>
+<gloss>to seem to want</gloss>

ルミナス:
父は僕がいつも欲しがっていた自転車を買ってくれた My father bought me the bicycle (which) I had wanted for a long time.
その子はアイスクリームを泣いて欲しがった The child cried for ice cream.
GG5 (-がる)
(1) 〔…という感情･感覚を表す〕
(2) 〔…したいという気持ちを表す〕

I was going to comment that it seems only to be used in the third person (as in all 11 sentences), but then I saw that ルミナス example which is first person.
I think GG5's explanation is good -  the ...を表す is important, It's more about expressing and stating rather than appearing.
I'll suggest some tweaks.

@@ -20,3 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>to appear to desire</gloss>
-<gloss>to seemingly want</gloss>
-<gloss>to apparently wish for</gloss>
+<gloss>to express a desire</gloss>
+<gloss>to display want</gloss>
+<gloss>to indicate a wish for</gloss>

meikyo
が・る〘接尾〙
…という気持ちや様子を外に見せる意を表す。「悲し─・欲し─・恥ずかし─」「寒む─・痛た─・怖わ─」「新し─・珍し─」「いや─・不思議─」「眠た─・煙た─」「会いた─・知りた─・話した
─」「粋─・通─」「強─・得意─（＝ぶる）」 感情や感覚が外部に現れた様子をいう。「悲しがって（＝悲しそうにして）いる姿が哀れだ」

The point I was making is that it won't be obvious from the original glosses that this is a verb you only use to describe what others appear to want. You 
wouldn't say X私はこれほしがっているよね to say "I want this", and I think this needs to be made clear in all -がる entries.

My problem with this suggestion is that none of the 3 JEs I use has any mention of appear/seemingly, and none of the 11 Tanaka sentences does either. The closest I can see is a また at the end of Koj's explanation. The original glosses are pretty close to the ones in the references. I suspect it's used just as a verbification of 欲しい.

Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<field>&law;</field>

https://kotobank.jp/word/文書通信交通滞在費-679944
給与やボーナスにあたる議員歳費（年間約2100万円）とは別に、国会議員に毎月100万円支給される公費。電話代、郵便代、交通費、東京での滞在費
などの名目で支給される。

gg5: 滞在費　the living expenses during one's stay 《in the US》.

it's wider than hotel expenses, not sure how to gloss

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>hotel expenses</gloss>
-<gloss>expenses incurred during a stay</gloss>
+<gloss>living expenses (incurred during a short or long stay)</gloss>

Merging.

daij, koj, nikk

I think this should be merged with 乱入. No ref has them as separate entries.

@@ -13 +13,3 @@
-<gloss>enter without permission</gloss>
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
+<gloss>entering without permission</gloss>
+<gloss>trespassing</gloss>

@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2852920">かわりばんこに</xref>

@@ -19 +19 @@
-<s_inf>usu. adverbially as 代わり番こに</s_inf>
+<s_inf>usu. adverbially as 〜に</s_inf>

G n-grams:

代わりばんこ	5467
代わり番こ	676
代り番こ	127
かわりばんこ	16744

代わりばんこに	3848
代わり番こに	478
代り番こに	110
かわりばんこに	11071

@@ -5 +5 @@
-<keb>代わり番こ</keb>
+<keb>代わりばんこ</keb>
@@ -8 +8 @@
-<keb>代わりばんこ</keb>
+<keb>代わり番こ</keb>
@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc>

gg5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden_city_movement

I don't think "rural city" is right.

@@ -16 +16 @@
-<gloss>rural or garden city</gloss>
+<gloss>garden city</gloss>

Probably better to lead with this gloss.

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<gloss>team of reporters</gloss>
@@ -13 +13,0 @@
-<gloss>team of reporters</gloss>

I don't like it either.

@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-<gloss>data collecting party</gloss>
@@ -13,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>team of reporters</gloss>

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/0fbc3f756490189b41ebd593f336dc25efd6c1d6?page=3

デイリー新潮取材班 (at the bottom of an article, i.e. the authors)

" data collecting party" sounds weird to me.

GG5

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>reader feedback (to author, magazines, etc.)</gloss>
@@ -14 +15 @@
-<gloss>reader feedback (to author, magazines, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>readers' forum</gloss>

I think this needs some explanation. This is what I gathered from random Google results.

@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+<gloss>reader feedback (to author, magazines, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>mail from readers</gloss>

読者の声	54727

@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>readers voice</gloss>
+<gloss>reader's voice</gloss>

中辞典: 杜の都仙台 the tree-clad city of Sendai.

杜の都	138824
森の都	6613
wiki

@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>杜の都</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -10,0 +14 @@
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -12 +16 @@
-<gloss>tree-clad town</gloss>
+<gloss>Capital of Trees (nickname for Sendai City)</gloss>

gg5

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>displeasure</gloss>

Entry created

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>もんじゃ焼</keb>
@@ -14 +17 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">pan-fried batter with various fillings</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">dish of pan-fried batter with various fillings</gloss>

"batter" fell off

@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">pan-fried with various fillings</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">pan-fried batter with various fillings</gloss>

is "pancake thinner than okonomiyaki" really right? you eat it partially uncooked, essentially? it never really turns into anything 
you could correctly call "cake"... I see it's often described as "pan-fried batter" online

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1001890">お好み焼き</xref>
+<field>&food;</field>
@@ -14 +14 @@
-<gloss g_type="expl">savoury pancake with various fillings, thinner than okonomiyaki</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">pan-fried with various fillings</gloss>

G n-grams:

手に乗る	8279
手にのる	1623

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>手にのる</keb>

gg5

@@ -13 +13,2 @@
-<gloss>to be fooled by something</gloss>
+<misc>&id;</misc>
+<gloss>to fall for a trick</gloss>
@@ -15 +16 @@
-<gloss>to fall for a trick</gloss>
+<gloss>to play into the hands (of)</gloss>

more commonly as xref

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1656460">日露戦争</xref>

日露戦役	1987
日露戦争	252805
GG5

Rene added the "sens" in 2007, possibly because it was on the NHK list of don't-use terms. I don't think it's needed.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<misc>&sens;</misc>
+<misc>&hist;</misc>

Entry created

??

I preferred the previous version.

@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>modan-yaki (okonomiyaki fried with yaki-soba on top)</gloss>
+<gloss>modan'yaki (okonomiyaki fried with yaki-soba on top)</gloss>

@@ -18 +18,2 @@
-<gloss>modan'yaki (okonomiyaki fried with yaki-soba on top)</gloss>
+<gloss>modan-yaki (okonomiyaki fried with yaki-soba on top)</gloss>
+<gloss>modern-yaki</gloss>

モダン焼きを	2992
モダン焼を	332

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>モダン焼</keb>
@@ -12 +15,8 @@
-<gloss>modan'yaki (okonomiyaki topped with yaki-soba and fried together)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1001890">お好み焼き</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1001890">お好み焼き</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1001890">お好み焼き</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1001890">お好み焼き</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1001890">お好み焼き</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1001890">お好み焼き</xref>
+<field>&food;</field>
+<gloss>modan'yaki (okonomiyaki fried with yaki-soba on top)</gloss>

Entry created

I don't think it's needed.

Do we need this? こう can be used with any verb.

@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-<gloss>to (do) like this</gloss>
+<gloss>to do like this</gloss>
+<gloss>to do this way</gloss>
+<gloss>to do in this manner</gloss>

@@ -10,2 +10,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1157170">為る・する・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1157170">為る・する・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1157170">する・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1157170">する・1</xref>

@@ -10,1 +10,1 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1157170">為る・する</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1157170">為る・する・1</xref>

"Dai Kanwa Jiten" site:ac.jp 30 googits
(including https://japanknowledge.asia-u.ac.jp/en/contents/daikanwa/)
site:go.jp 14 googits

"Daikanwa Jiten" site:ac.jp 19 googits
site:go.jp 6 googits

"Dai Kan-Wa Jiten" site:ac.jp 10 googits
site:go.jp 4 googits

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Dai Kan-Wa Jiten (major kanji dictionary compiled by Morohashi Tetsuji)</gloss>
+<gloss>Dai Kanwa Jiten (major kanji dictionary compiled by Morohashi Tetsuji)</gloss>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dai_Kan-Wa_Jiten

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Dai Kanwa Jiten (major kanji dictionary, edited by Morohashi Tetsuji)</gloss>
+<gloss>Dai Kan-Wa Jiten (major kanji dictionary compiled by Morohashi Tetsuji)</gloss>

Capitalization.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>Dai Kanwa Jiten (major Kanji Dictionary, edited by Morohashi Tetsuji)</gloss>
+<gloss>Dai Kanwa Jiten (major kanji dictionary, edited by Morohashi Tetsuji)</gloss>

Entry created

removing the last 3 with less than 1k in the 
ngrams.

@@ -36,9 +35,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ウイッス</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ウィーッス</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ウース</reb>

G n-grams:

おいっす	13584
うっす	23779 <- false positives
オイッス	7521
ういっす	6969
うぃーっす	4666
うぃっす	3561
うぃーす	3256
ウッス	2729
うーす	1871
ウィッス	1718
ウィース	1373
ウイッス	827
ウィーッス	501
ウース	450

@@ -8 +8 @@
-<reb>ういっす</reb>
+<reb>うっす</reb>
@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<reb>ういっす</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -14,0 +18,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>うぃっす</reb>
@@ -19,0 +26,12 @@
+<reb>ウッス</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>うーす</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウィッス</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウィース</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -20,0 +39,6 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウィーッス</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウース</reb>

おいっす	13584
ういっす	6969
オイッス	7521
ウイッス	827
うぃーっす	4666
うぃーす	3256

Proposed merge of  2840692.

@@ -11,0 +12,6 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>うぃーっす</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>うぃーす</reb>

おいっす	13584
オイッス	7521
ういっす	6969
ウイッス	827
オイッす	No matches
ウイッす	20
オイっす	44
ウイっす	No matches

Merging in おいっす from Nicolas' new entry suggestion.

@@ -4,0 +5,3 @@
+<reb>おいっす</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
@@ -5,0 +9,6 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>オイッス</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ウイッス</reb>
@@ -8,0 +18 @@
+<misc>&male;</misc>
@@ -10,2 +20,3 @@
-<s_inf>possibly from おっす</s_inf>
-<gloss>Hi</gloss>
+<gloss>hey</gloss>
+<gloss>yo</gloss>
+<gloss>hi</gloss>

https://asm.asahi.com/article/12279596
ビジネスシーンにおいて装いを気にかけることはぜいたくなのか？　投資なのか？　グローバル視点で自分を客観視してみよう。

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos>

Entry created

gg5, prog

@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+<gloss>to pick a quarrel</gloss>

G n-grams:

喧嘩を売る	21238
ケンカを売る	9294
けんかを売る	2050

@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>ケンカを売る</keb>

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/0fbc3f756490189b41ebd593f336dc25efd6c1d6
ドル建てで取引される原油などの価格が上昇しているのに加えて、円安になっているため、輸入物価は上がるばかりで日本国内の価格上昇はさらに大
きくなっています。まさにダブルパンチです。

@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<field>&sports;</field>
@@ -9,0 +11,6 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>one-two punch</gloss>
+<gloss>double whammy</gloss>
+<gloss>twofold blow</gloss>

Entry created

I don't think the x-refs are needed.

@@ -11,5 +11,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1157170">する・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1157170">する・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2136890">とする・1</xref>
-<gloss>to try and do something</gloss>
-<gloss>to attempt to do something</gloss>
+<gloss>to try to do</gloss>
+<gloss>to attempt to do</gloss>

@@ -11,2 +11,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1157170">為る・する・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1157170">為る・する・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1157170">する・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1157170">する・1</xref>

G n-grams: 3612951

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

nikk

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>now's the (important) time</gloss>
+<gloss>now is the (important) time</gloss>

daij, gg5

Not an adverb. The と is quotative.

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
+<pos>&exp;</pos>
@@ -15,3 +14,5 @@
-<s_inf>often used as ここぞというとき or ここぞとばかり</s_inf>
-<gloss>at the critical moment</gloss>
-<gloss>when it counts</gloss>
+<s_inf>usu. as 〜という時, 〜というところ, 〜とばかり, etc.</s_inf>
+<gloss>now's the (important) time</gloss>
+<gloss>this is the (critical) moment</gloss>
+<gloss>this is when it matters</gloss>
+<gloss>this is the place</gloss>

此処ぞ	487
ここぞ	413532

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>

No further comments

GG5 & 新和英中辞典 too

Leaving it open for a bit. It always seems to be ここぞと... or ここぞの....

@@ -11,1 +11,2 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adv-to;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -14,1 +15,1 @@
-<gloss>critical moment</gloss>
+<gloss>at the critical moment</gloss>

simplified

@@ -12,5 +11,0 @@
-<re_restr>うんこ製造機</re_restr>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ウンコせいぞうき</reb>
-<re_restr>ウンコ製造機</re_restr>

@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>someone who does not contribute anything to society</gloss>
+<gloss>person who does not contribute anything to society</gloss>

I suggest recasting it this way.

@@ -23,2 +23,2 @@
-<gloss>poop-producing machine</gloss>
-<gloss g_type="fig">human (oft. derogatory of somebody who does not contribute anything to society)</gloss>
+<gloss>someone who does not contribute anything to society</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="lit">poop-producing machine</gloss>

hatena
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/������¤%B
5%A1

460k for each variation

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1546640">要る</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1546640">いる</xref>

i'm not sure this should be an entry.  'anai'->'an' is a common kansai thing.  however, wwwjdic doesn't handle it and we have an entry for わからん...  perhaps a few extremely common examples can be allowed in

大阪弁普及会, 実用日本語表現辞典
但馬方言辞典

It has a note.

エロチックブログ	No matches
エロブログ	No matches
エログ	36376

I feel like a note in エログ would be a better way of handling it

perhaps.  i'm less inclined to add an adj-i+noun combo, though.  エロブログ would be a better entry, but i suspect that エロ is quite productive as a suffix

maybe it's short for "エロいブログ" rather than "エロチックブログ"? エ
ロいブログ" gets 502,000 results. "エロブログ" also gets 1,520,000 
results

16k hits. Proposed エログ entry is an abbreviation.

@@ -9,2 +8,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2721040">エロチックブログ</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="2721040">エロチックブログ</xref>
@@ -13 +11,2 @@
-<gloss>erotic blog</gloss>
+<gloss>adult blog</gloss>
+<gloss>porn blog</gloss>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Gairaigo_and_Wasei-eigo_terms

17M hits; the first 30 or so seem genuine.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>sum of the length, width, and height (of a package, etc.)</gloss>
+<gloss>sum of the length, width and height (of a package, etc.)</gloss>

@@ -12,2 +12 @@
-<gloss>the sum of the length, width, and height of a package</gloss>
-<gloss>length + width + height</gloss>
+<gloss>sum of the length, width, and height (of a package, etc.)</gloss>

Indeed it has.

I came across it today in this context:
大きい荷物については3辺合計160cm以内25kgまでで30,450円です。
.
https://www.y-logi.com/service/kaigai/service/smart/images/main02_img_08.jpg
http://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q1344495883
.
I don't have a reference for the reading -- I just guessed.
But GG5 has
さんぺんそくりょう【三辺測量】 外字(sanpensokury￣o)
【測量】 trilateration.

@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2029110">な・1</xref>
@@ -15 +16 @@
-<s_inf>contraction of する+な</s_inf>
+<s_inf>contraction of するな</s_inf>

@@ -12,2 +12,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1157170">為る・する・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1157170">為る・する・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1157170">する・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1157170">する・1</xref>

@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1157170">為る・する・1</xref>

https://www.weblio.jp/content/すな?edc=OSAKA
https://www.weblio.jp/content/すんな
https://m.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/detail/q14144
120444

I think the note is enough. An xref to する[01] is not a lot of use.

I think "conjugated form of verb ⇒する" is a valid and useful form of xref

I don't think we should use dialect codes in notes.
Don't see a need for the x-ref.

@@ -18,3 +18 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1157170">する・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1157170">する・1</xref>
-<s_inf>ksb equiv. of しないで（ください）</s_inf>
+<s_inf>equiv. to しないで（ください）in standard Japanese</s_inf>

@@ -18,2 +18,2 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1157170">為る・する・1</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1157170">為る・する・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1157170">する・1</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1157170">する・1</xref>

For now let's go with one entry.

I think "mismatched" is too broad.

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>marriage between mismatched partners (esp. of marriages where the wife has a higher financial or social status)</gloss>
+<gloss>marriage in which one partner (esp. the wife) has a significantly higher income or social status</gloss>

daijr
俗に，収入や社会的地位などについて格差がある男女による結婚。多くの場合，女性の立場が強い場合について言う。

@@ -13 +13 @@
-<gloss>marriage between mismatched partners (esp. in terms of wealth)</gloss>
+<gloss>marriage between mismatched partners (esp. of marriages where the wife has a higher financial or social status)</gloss>

g ng
格差婚	21897
zokugo, chiezo
http://zokugo-dict.com/06ka/kakusakon.htm
A native informant didn't agree it applies to any mismatch (such as looks, etc.), like chiezo says, so I compromised 
and made it "esp. wealth"

@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-<gloss>cloth face mask sent out to every household in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic</gloss>
+<gloss>Abe mask</gloss>
+<gloss g_type="expl">cloth face mask sent out to every household in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic</gloss>

Thanks, better.

Official name.

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>cloth face mask sent out to every household in Japan during the corona pandemic</gloss>
+<gloss>cloth face mask sent out to every household in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic</gloss>

Yield!

GG5:
【仏教】 (an) incarnation; (an) avatar.
～する appear in [take on] human form; incarnate oneself 《as…》

I think avatar is ok.

rh avatar
the descent of a deity to the earth in an 
incarnate form or some manifest shape

OK so it's usu. used spec in hinduism but I 
think it's actually more fitting than 
incarnation because w incarnation, I get the 
feeling the Buddha has been reborn on Earth, 
or at least a manifestation in a more 
permanent form (Jesus being God incarnate), 
while 化現 seems to include more temporary 
manifestations (like say in the Greek myths)

Also I'm not convinced 化現 has to be in a 
"bodily form", that's not specified in the 
kokugos ("姿を変えて"). brit for example says
仏陀や菩薩が，この現実世界に惑い苦しむ生きとし生けるもの
を救うために，-いろいろな形をとって-現実の世界に現れるこ
と。 (my emphasis)


google.books
この三輪山の神・大物主神は蛇の姿に化現して神の妻のャマト
トトヒモモソヒメの前に姿を現したという話
snake (ok, body)

http://www.odawara-
hotelgreen.com/odawara/hachifukujin
福禄寿
中国の神様で、人々と言うより中国道教の理想である幸福、俸
禄の意味を持ち南極老人星の化現として現われた神様とされて
います。
(fukurokuju is himself a god)


nikk 大聖不動明王
 密教では大日如来の化現として、一切の悪魔煩悩を降伏させ
る。

noticed by the way kotobank's nikk has 転じて、
ものが形になってあらわれること。

https://www.info.pmda.go.jp/downfiles/otc/PDF/
J0601006951_01_A.pdf
(3)みずむし・たむし等又は化現している 。

https://www.mmba.jp/archives/36054
この星の水は姿を変え様々に化現しているが

@@ -15 +15 @@
-<gloss>manifesting in bodily form (of a god or Buddha)</gloss>
+<gloss>manifesting in a bodily form (of a god or Buddha)</gloss>
@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+<gloss>avatar</gloss>

daijr: 神仏などが姿を変えてこの世に現れること。

I don't think it's just Buddhas and Bodhisattvas.
I think "in our world" is implied.
I think we should drop "avatar".

@@ -15,3 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>appearing (in changed shape) in our world (of a Buddha or Bodhisattva)</gloss>
-<gloss>incarnation on earth</gloss>
-<gloss>avatar</gloss>
+<gloss>manifesting in bodily form (of a god or Buddha)</gloss>
+<gloss>incarnation</gloss>

all kokugos say it's the act of appearing (現れ
ること）. only meikyo has it as また、そのもの)

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos>
@@ -14 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>incarnation</gloss>
+<gloss>appearing (in changed shape) in our world (of a Buddha or Bodhisattva)</gloss>
+<gloss>incarnation on earth</gloss>

後から	2742192
あとから	637290

@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_pri>spec1</ke_pri>
@@ -8,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>

後から	2742192
後から後から	41074
彼はよろめきながら後からついてきた。 He came tumbling after. 
私は後から行きます。 I'll join you later.

I guess so. Most references only have 後から後から. There are several sentences using it, so I'll index them.

@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+<gloss>later</gloss>

https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/後から

I think we need to mention that it's online.
Either "movie" or "feature film".

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>unofficial video summary of a feature movie (with still images or clips taken from the movie)</gloss>
+<gloss>unofficial online video summarizing a feature film (with still images or clips from the film)</gloss>

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>unofficial video summary of a full-length movie (with still images or clips taken from the movie)</gloss>
+<gloss>unofficial video summary of a feature movie (with still images or clips taken from the movie)</gloss>

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2021/06/24/national/crime-legal/fast-movies/
"Miyagi Prefectural Police on Wednesday arrested three people for allegedly posting so-called fast movies, or illegally 
edited short version of copyrighted films, on YouTube.
in the news again today (same case as the one described above)
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/pickup/6409916
長編映画を１０分程度にまとめた「ファスト映画」を無断で動画投稿サイトに公開したとして、著作権法違反に問われた札幌市東区、無職の被告
の男（２５）に対し、仙台地裁（大川隆男裁判長）は１６日、懲役２年、罰金２００万円、執行猶予４年（求刑・懲役２年、罰金２００万円）、
ほか２被告に懲役１年６月、執行猶予３年などの判決を言い渡した。ファスト映画を巡る事件では全国初の判決。

@@ -12 +12 @@
-<gloss>short, unofficial video posted online summarizing the plot of a movie (usu. with still images or clips taken from the movie)</gloss>
+<gloss>unofficial video summary of a full-length movie (with still images or clips taken from the movie)</gloss>

Probably doesn't need the parenthesized part.